It's because we don't need tort reform, our system is pretty good. The vast majority of reasons people use for tort reform were made up by the insurance companies.
It's these agency job to look at this sort of thing. They aren't stopping innovation. They make plans, and a lot of this stuff will be inevitable. Autonomous cars doing driver by shooting will happen. What do we do about that? Should we have a plan? There will be people who use them to deliver bombs. Maybe we should thing about what to do? Start getting a plan together?
You aren't informed at all. You're just a knee jerk hater.
Because the common perception of lawsuit is wrong. People discussing this know that. If it's such a problem, then why do they design cars to pull to one side when the brakes are hit hard?
This would not work, for the simple reason that there is no way to safely move on most roads
their could be with autonomous cars. They will all be talking to each other so the can position so everyone one has an escape. Granted it may very well be an escape route that will only work for the computer driver. Humans being slow and unreliable meat bags.
Also, you don't have nearly as much information as you think you do when some thing sudden happens. Most of the detail informaiton is added after the fact by your brain.
You scenarios will be irrelevant once autonomous cars hit saturation point.
I used to hate performance reviews, then about 13 years ago I got a manager who taught me how to properly do them. Now I always get the highest ratings. basically, it's become a glitch I can manipulate to get the maximum raise each year.
I've worked with too many good HR people to agree with that. HR knows the rules of how things function. HR can help you if you have an issue. I've gone to HR and said 'My dad is sick, whats the best way for me to take time off? and they know the federal rules I would ahve had no clue about.
I've work with bad HR as well, where they have no power, can't really help any one, and just hand out paychecks.
BTW- executive don't need HR to get people they want hired, hired. You're whole assertions is flawed.
they are designed by HR. HR doesn't know jack about interface design. HR gets the cheapest person they can because it isn't considered critical. Web entry forms are usually farmed out to people just getting into the industry. No one has to learn engineering techniques to become 'qualified' to write software.
except the St. Google has purchased are capably of much finer detail, ans they are lobbying to relax the regulations even more. If they are successful, then Google's Sats can see you face.,
A pattern matching job for how they are currently doing their work? this would be trivial. One for how they are Supposed to be doing their work? that would be hard
Slashdot Mirror
Groovy.
http://news.toyark.com/wp-cont...
COBOL is an excellent language for hat it was designed for. I can only assume your hate comes from ignorance.
It seems to me, your hate would be better directed at poor engineering and software engineering standards then the tools.
silicon isn't sand. It's found in sand and stone, among other places.
Adam Corolla has a whole podcast network, and that is bigger then TWIT and Leo.
The problem with Patent troll is that anyone who has a claim is now called a troll.
When you create a nuclear wasteland, it's everyone's world suffers.
It's because we don't need tort reform, our system is pretty good. The vast majority of reasons people use for tort reform were made up by the insurance companies.
You clearly don't know any lawyers.
eh, Corolla?
Yes, punish the victim, genius.
The same reason people try to hack NASA to find the 'Truth' about aliens?
Thing didn't go the way I wanted, clearly bribery.
So if the came lord said: 'Lets figure out how to protect ourselves when the other cave people start throwing rocks at us' that would be bad?
It's these agency job to look at this sort of thing. They aren't stopping innovation. They make plans, and a lot of this stuff will be inevitable.
Autonomous cars doing driver by shooting will happen. What do we do about that? Should we have a plan? There will be people who use them to deliver bombs. Maybe we should thing about what to do? Start getting a plan together?
You aren't informed at all. You're just a knee jerk hater.
Because the common perception of lawsuit is wrong. People discussing this know that.
If it's such a problem, then why do they design cars to pull to one side when the brakes are hit hard?
Fewer people drive without insurance when its mandatory.
This would not work, for the simple reason that there is no way to safely move on most roads
their could be with autonomous cars. They will all be talking to each other so the can position so everyone one has an escape. Granted it may very well be an escape route that will only work for the computer driver. Humans being slow and unreliable meat bags.
Also, you don't have nearly as much information as you think you do when some thing sudden happens. Most of the detail informaiton is added after the fact by your brain.
You scenarios will be irrelevant once autonomous cars hit saturation point.
The whole premise is just an attempt to make philosophy seem relevant.
It's considered broken by people who don't get involved. Their effort revolves around complaining on website.
It's a debate because in the case you stated it impacts people who were not involved in the choice.
There is more then accident insurance.
I used to hate performance reviews, then about 13 years ago I got a manager who taught me how to properly do them. Now I always get the highest ratings.
basically, it's become a glitch I can manipulate to get the maximum raise each year.
I've worked with too many good HR people to agree with that.
HR knows the rules of how things function. HR can help you if you have an issue. I've gone to HR and said 'My dad is sick, whats the best way for me to take time off? and they know the federal rules I would ahve had no clue about.
I've work with bad HR as well, where they have no power, can't really help any one, and just hand out paychecks.
BTW- executive don't need HR to get people they want hired, hired. You're whole assertions is flawed.
Wrap them all up under 'consulting. So you were 'Consulting' for 5 years. Then in the body list consulting, with each place under it.
That's what I do.
I would say:
then only the most desperate applications will do it
I have never waited longer then 15 minute at a DMV to get my DL renewed. Well, not since the 80's.
they are designed by HR.
HR doesn't know jack about interface design.
HR gets the cheapest person they can because it isn't considered critical.
Web entry forms are usually farmed out to people just getting into the industry.
No one has to learn engineering techniques to become 'qualified' to write software.
except the St. Google has purchased are capably of much finer detail, ans they are lobbying to relax the regulations even more. If they are successful, then Google's Sats can see you face.,
A pattern matching job for how they are currently doing their work? this would be trivial.
One for how they are Supposed to be doing their work? that would be hard
Anyways, this is just telework people.