"", people have been doing it for millennia. " are you stupid? 1000 year ago people were going to work in the dark? You seriously think that? Tell me, slick, what work were they doing 1000 years ago that required them to do it a specific clock time? 500 years ago? 250 years ago? Going to work is a modern contrivance, going to work at the same specific clock time is a 20th century invention.
All you have showed us is that you can't think very deeply. You realize the law the FCC upholds is designed to change with the culture? Hannibal is broadcast TV.
Maybe you have this problem becasue you write so poorly?
What was your point of you original comment? "Think about that for a bit. Do you see the problem? If you're having trouble, check out a website called youtube."
Are you saying youtube constitute evidence and people ignore it? or are you saying youtube videos show hoaxs as real and people believe them?
YOU aren't being clear. Don't try tio hide that in 'people don't think for themselves." The problem here is you.
The fallacy there is that belief in those thing reflect intelligence or education. UP until a masters degree, the more educated soneon is the more easily they believe in the crap.
It's not education per se, it's the lack of critical thinking skills.
" and flooding of Florida should nearly be complete. " lie. " Don't forget about the Polar Bears Drowning...." it's happening, although some of mating with brown bears and creating a new species.
"I look and see Piltdown Man all over again. " This you are clueless. Their was NEVER scientific consensus on piltdown man, and when Scientist looked at it they declared it a fraud.
Let me explain this to you..well not to you becasue clearly you are an idiot who could change his narrative if he tried, but to the people who ahd the misfortune of reading your drivel. Everything listed below has falsifiable tests, and in fact any of it can be tested by anmyon with an 8th grade understanding of sciecne...so not you. 1) Visible light hits the earth 2) When Visible light hits the earth IR is generated. 3) Visible light pass through CO2 4) Man spews giga-tonnes more CO2 then can be absorbed back into the system. This is becasue we dig up stored CO2 and release it in the air. 5) CO2 absorbs energy from IR.
SO more CO2 in the air, more energy it absorbs. Energy(heat) continues to rise. That is AGW.
So, please come up with a scientific test that disproves any of those points. I look forward to you nobel prize winning paper. Or, you need to explain what trapping more and more energy doesn't impact the climate. If you can' do either of those, you have two choice: Continue spouting off nonsense like an idiot, or change you narrative to accept proven scientific facts.
" I was always taught to pay attention to my surroundings " but you don't. NO one does. There are moments and visual cues filled in by the brain they don't always reflect whats actually happening. You do not see everything in front of you, you see piece of it and your brain stitches it together.
Plus, you can't stay focused on that 100% of the time.
Since this is about car to car collision, I have no idea why you bring pedestrians up. haha, yes I do. You have an unjustified bias and your ego depends you bring it up in order to make yourself feel important.
Assuming you can move. Moving requires money, it means breaking with contact, it means needing a new job. If it was easy, everyone would live in Hawaii.
What back peddle? That have a spot on their bills specifically for additional services. IT's been there as long as I can remember and I've been with T-Mobile for over a decade.
Maybe this court case will get so every cell provider no longer HAS to take these charges.
Slashdot Mirror
"", people have been doing it for millennia. "
are you stupid?
1000 year ago people were going to work in the dark? You seriously think that?
Tell me, slick, what work were they doing 1000 years ago that required them to do it a specific clock time? 500 years ago? 250 years ago?
Going to work is a modern contrivance, going to work at the same specific clock time is a 20th century invention.
All you have showed us is that you can't think very deeply. You realize the law the FCC upholds is designed to change with the culture?
Hannibal is broadcast TV.
to build his theocracy.
"You just said yourself that most are manipulated and faked. That means a percentage, even if very low, is proof of whatever is recorded."
Thinking, learn it.
It just means the rest are useless blobs people use as an excuse to confirm a faulty narrative.
Maybe you have this problem becasue you write so poorly?
What was your point of you original comment?
"Think about that for a bit. Do you see the problem? If you're having trouble, check out a website called youtube."
Are you saying youtube constitute evidence and people ignore it? or are you saying youtube videos show hoaxs as real and people believe them?
YOU aren't being clear. Don't try tio hide that in 'people don't think for themselves."
The problem here is you.
Actually, UFO groups have seen some seriously diminishing numbers in believers over the last decade.
Mostly, because of cameras.
I can excuse syfy. It's the history channel and the learning channel I can't excuse.
The fallacy there is that belief in those thing reflect intelligence or education. UP until a masters degree, the more educated soneon is the more easily they believe in the crap.
It's not education per se, it's the lack of critical thinking skills.
"We should be many Degrees warmer"
lie.
"the Ice Sheets should be gone already"
lie.
" and flooding of Florida should nearly be complete. " ...."
lie.
" Don't forget about the Polar Bears Drowning
it's happening, although some of mating with brown bears and creating a new species.
"I look and see Piltdown Man all over again. "
This you are clueless. Their was NEVER scientific consensus on piltdown man, and when Scientist looked at it they declared it a fraud.
Let me explain this to you..well not to you becasue clearly you are an idiot who could change his narrative if he tried, but to the people who ahd the misfortune of reading your drivel.
Everything listed below has falsifiable tests, and in fact any of it can be tested by anmyon with an 8th grade understanding of sciecne...so not you.
1) Visible light hits the earth
2) When Visible light hits the earth IR is generated.
3) Visible light pass through CO2
4) Man spews giga-tonnes more CO2 then can be absorbed back into the system. This is becasue we dig up stored CO2 and release it in the air.
5) CO2 absorbs energy from IR.
SO more CO2 in the air, more energy it absorbs. Energy(heat) continues to rise.
That is AGW.
So, please come up with a scientific test that disproves any of those points. I look forward to you nobel prize winning paper.
Or, you need to explain what trapping more and more energy doesn't impact the climate.
If you can' do either of those, you have two choice: Continue spouting off nonsense like an idiot, or change you narrative to accept proven scientific facts.
oh, and read up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...
The anti-vaccine crazies have been around for decades. Well before wakefield committed fraud and illegal experimentation on children.
I think the more likely question is "What is it you don't know?"
There could very well be a reason for that behavior.
You and your puns need to shuffle out of here.
" I was always taught to pay attention to my surroundings "
but you don't. NO one does. There are moments and visual cues filled in by the brain they don't always reflect whats actually happening. You do not see everything in front of you, you see piece of it and your brain stitches it together.
Plus, you can't stay focused on that 100% of the time.
Since this is about car to car collision, I have no idea why you bring pedestrians up.
haha, yes I do. You have an unjustified bias and your ego depends you bring it up in order to make yourself feel important.
"It is generally better to give drivers information than hide it."
but nt in this case.
The fact that you want to shoot through an intersection in your truck is not good.
Nothing more gentlemanly then making 8 cars stop form normal flow so you can let one person get into the street.
Why do people like you chose to be so damn rude when they drive?
16.4.
Don't leave the curb until you see the walk sign come one, don't enter the intersection unless the walk sign is on.
So easy, even you could do it.
Considering the whole Janet Jackson issue was due to 1(one) letter, maybe they will
Assuming you can move. Moving requires money, it means breaking with contact, it means needing a new job.
If it was easy, everyone would live in Hawaii.
And in all 4 days you didn't have a chance to read it? Cause it doesn't apply here.
depends on time now, doesn't it?
What back peddle? That have a spot on their bills specifically for additional services. IT's been there as long as I can remember and I've been with T-Mobile for over a decade.
Maybe this court case will get so every cell provider no longer HAS to take these charges.
My T-Mobile bill has a place specifically for addition charges. East to find.
I think those crafty Devils call it:Addition charges.
Except I find it hard to believe T-Mobile hid anything.
All I can say is that ion my case, they refunded my money quickly and easily.