The only main issue with SAS 70 audits is that the company/process being audited defines the scope of the audit. You can choose to not report processes, systems, or users involved, and the auditing company will only cover the scope you've set forth.
IMHO SAS 70 is nowhere close to a comprehensive auditing tool for SOx or HIPAA compliance.
OP: "The problem is... the reviews all seem to be user testimonials."
Isn't this exactly what you'd get from users here?
Well OK, in that case... I'm so happy that each soy cartridge I buy saves a baby seal, and now I don't have to worry about all those pesky greenhouse gasses. I'll feel much better about the environment while I'm out playing hackeysack now.
Slashdot Mirror
More importantly, this demo was 3 months before the patent was even filed (October 22, 2004). A good example of prior art
I'd go for: "Government gets it up while economy goes down"
Once OSX becomes more mature, they can release OSX Cougar.
The only main issue with SAS 70 audits is that the company/process being audited defines the scope of the audit. You can choose to not report processes, systems, or users involved, and the auditing company will only cover the scope you've set forth. IMHO SAS 70 is nowhere close to a comprehensive auditing tool for SOx or HIPAA compliance.
I always considered them amoral. It's not like they're trying to do wrong, they just don't care.
Are you by chance trading in FCOJ?
OP: "The problem is... the reviews all seem to be user testimonials." Isn't this exactly what you'd get from users here?
Well OK, in that case... I'm so happy that each soy cartridge I buy saves a baby seal, and now I don't have to worry about all those pesky greenhouse gasses. I'll feel much better about the environment while I'm out playing hackeysack now.