David Leigh/Guardian is working in the interest of CIA/MI6 and looking not to collaborate with WikiLeaks, but to ensnare him for prosecution. Clue: DL Insisting on seeing the actual files Clue: DL Pressing for the GPG passphrase Clue: DL Publishing the ENTIRE proceeding and passphrase in a book
Dumbshit-Borg is either a long-time mole or was "turned" Clue: D-B had full access to all unredacted material Clue: D-B acrimoniously split with Assange/WikiLeaks over ego-boundary shit and speculative "risk" issues Clue: D-B in his schism is part of the probable exposure of these cables - portrayed as an "accident", while he was unilaterally and admittedly sabotaging WikiLeaks Clue: D-B can now say "I told you so" over this exposure of sources - pointing to this as evidence, rather than a situation he perpetrated
The US Army Counterintelligence Agency said in 2008 that WikiLeaks was"a potential force protection, counterintelligence, OPSEC, and INFOSEC threat to the US Army" and PLANNED OPERATIONS to neutralise/discredit WikiLeaks:
"The identification, exposure, or termination of employment of or legal actions against current or former insiders, leakers, or whistleblowers could damage or destroy this center of gravity and deter others from using Wikileaks.org to make such information public."
Question: Do you think that the Agency makes these declarations in vain, for their entertainment value?
Question: Do you think they are alone, and that there are not equivalent planned and current operations by the CIA, etc.?
Question: Are the combined actions of DL and D-B implausible as the intended outcome of a counter-WikiLeaks strategy, set in motion by one or more intelligence agencies, including US Army Counterintelligence?
Think about it. Once they set this down IN PRINT, internally, and don't have a "positive" outcome? Sombody goes through the ringer.
This is likely all a setup. One with a scenario that is similar to the one indicated here, if not completely identical. It is one where where David Leigh and Dumbshit-Borg are either pathetic and self-serving dupes, or sickening quislings.
Either way, this is a noose fabricated of intentional actions with plausible deniability. Identify WikiLeaks with Assange's personality, and attack the personality. Attack the credibility of WikiLeaks methodology while distracting from their effectiveness and success in exposing filth, corruption and illegal government action.
I know the will get Assange one way or another. They just created the circumstance to have him charged in Australia - their one sure bet. But watch out, DL and D-B.
When your mysterious, untimely deaths occur, I will look at it as confirmation of these speculations.
These leaked cables are about HAVING KILLED PEOPLE!
Including the point-blank firing of weapons into the heads of toddlers.
Including Israeli lies about killing "terrorists" being revealed as bombing and killing 16 civilian villagers, at prayer.
Like most reactionary cranks, you fret SO over the theoretical loss of life that might occur, if illegal and anti-democratic secrecy is not punitively enforced.
Where is your concern, passion and outrage about the ACTUAL callous and criminal loss of life, that would have initiated any such threat?
Your hypocrisy and disingenuous moral posturing stinks like the foetid pool of death that you defend.
Yes. But it's a private ritual, not heavily vetted or gate-kept, especially with a sponsorship or introduction.
As a 35-year lapsed Catholic, without confirmation, I could easily take communion in this city. I will never get an invitation to see the Pope, or witness the real dealings of the Vatican bank.
Likewise, because there are garden variety freemasons, that doesn't disprove the secret society as an actor in crypto-politics and crypto-economics. In fact, these things are a part of established record.
I mean, if you put a wad of foil in the microwave, you can get the thing to fry itself.
Would clothing with ceramic magnets in it do this to a backscatter xray or a tetrahertz mw scanner? I'm sure there's something short of an EMP that would at least deny service by such a device. Perhaps even scatter the same harmful radiation back on its operators?
This is an interesting line of inquiry. Like most forms of security, there are unexplored use cases that were never properly modelled for threat. I'm thinking this seems like an excellent practical topic for something we'd expect to see at DefCon - like this year's defeat of the CLIQ technology electro-mechanical high-security locks, mandated by Federal government.
I don't advocate this - simply applaud the ingenuity and sentiment.
"the ANSI standard 'is not applicable to covert operations.' " parses alright. Still, for certainty of context, I'd like to read this in the original German language.
There's a rich man or two, after this "Solyndra" scam was used by insiders to funnel 500Mil. Mark my words.
You live in a Kleptocracy. The "foreign competitiveness" front sound very plausible. That's why the whole "green technology boondoggle/buble exists. Not that it might not be needed - but any affair involving billionaires will be used for private extraction. We live in the "post-economic" era, where the pretense of an economy is used to commit outrageous crimes.
In fact, "Star Trek" despite its desirability and delightfulness, is really just propaganda for an impossibility: The peaceful yet militarised, multilateral society that resorts to force only to enforce its ethical vision.
It is the story an elite wants its liberal, middle classes to believe, as it pursues a globalist agenda. It has the fantastical elements of unlimited vistas of frontier, with no barrier to resource consumption or constraint on availability.
Star Trek is the wet dream for the New World Order.
There are Catholic churches everywhere. It's easy to be confirmed, and take regular communion.
There's also a Vatican, a Vatican bank - and circles-within-circles of secret initiation and lineage, some with "occult pretensions".
The presence of the former is not a disqualifier of the latter, nor does it dilute - but rather conceals.
If you can't tell the difference, or don't wish to investigate the difference between the neighbourhood ring-and-fez lodge from, say "Propaganda Due" - then you are perfectly within your rights.
And the top-level aprons are pleased with you exercising them.
I think that it is at least worthy of consideration, the historical connection that people like MacGregor Mathers and Aleister Crowley made, between the Golden Dawn, OTO and freemasonry.
Slashdot Mirror
Don't take a job in the Mafia's typing pool.
Don't support any government with a standing army, stationed in any foreign nation.
Look at this from the tin-hat angle:
David Leigh/Guardian is working in the interest of CIA/MI6 and looking not to collaborate with WikiLeaks, but to ensnare him for prosecution.
Clue: DL Insisting on seeing the actual files
Clue: DL Pressing for the GPG passphrase
Clue: DL Publishing the ENTIRE proceeding and passphrase in a book
Dumbshit-Borg is either a long-time mole or was "turned"
Clue: D-B had full access to all unredacted material
Clue: D-B acrimoniously split with Assange/WikiLeaks over ego-boundary shit and speculative "risk" issues
Clue: D-B in his schism is part of the probable exposure of these cables - portrayed as an "accident", while he was unilaterally and admittedly sabotaging WikiLeaks
Clue: D-B can now say "I told you so" over this exposure of sources - pointing to this as evidence, rather than a situation he perpetrated
The US Army Counterintelligence Agency said in 2008 that WikiLeaks was"a potential force protection, counterintelligence, OPSEC, and INFOSEC threat to the US Army" and PLANNED OPERATIONS to neutralise/discredit WikiLeaks:
"The identification, exposure, or termination of employment of or legal actions against current or former insiders, leakers, or whistleblowers could damage or destroy this center of gravity and deter others from using Wikileaks.org to make such information public."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/28385794/Us-Intel-Wikileaks
Question: Do you think that the Agency makes these declarations in vain, for their entertainment value?
Question: Do you think they are alone, and that there are not equivalent planned and current operations by the CIA, etc.?
Question: Are the combined actions of DL and D-B implausible as the intended outcome of a counter-WikiLeaks strategy, set in motion by one or more intelligence agencies, including US Army Counterintelligence?
Think about it. Once they set this down IN PRINT, internally, and don't have a "positive" outcome? Sombody goes through the ringer.
This is likely all a setup. One with a scenario that is similar to the one indicated here, if not completely identical. It is one where where David Leigh and Dumbshit-Borg are either pathetic and self-serving dupes, or sickening quislings.
Either way, this is a noose fabricated of intentional actions with plausible deniability. Identify WikiLeaks with Assange's personality, and attack the personality. Attack the credibility of WikiLeaks methodology while distracting from their effectiveness and success in exposing filth, corruption and illegal government action.
I know the will get Assange one way or another. They just created the circumstance to have him charged in Australia - their one sure bet. But watch out, DL and D-B.
When your mysterious, untimely deaths occur, I will look at it as confirmation of these speculations.
And proudly burnish my tin-hat...
These leaked cables are about HAVING KILLED PEOPLE!
Including the point-blank firing of weapons into the heads of toddlers.
Including Israeli lies about killing "terrorists" being revealed as bombing and killing 16 civilian villagers, at prayer.
Like most reactionary cranks, you fret SO over the theoretical loss of life that might occur, if illegal and anti-democratic secrecy is not punitively enforced.
Where is your concern, passion and outrage about the ACTUAL callous and criminal loss of life, that would have initiated any such threat?
Your hypocrisy and disingenuous moral posturing stinks like the foetid pool of death that you defend.
CBS. What have they done, that is worth shitting on, in 30 years?
I say that a bunch of Anonymous types ought to buy microwave equipment and blast their Sat feed offline.
Unusual star?
It is David Bowie?
How about Crispin Glover?
That's OK. They aren't losing high-quality content.
Just commercial superfluity from Disney and Sony.
Touch screen?
That's not my finger...
"Nice sex"
Is that the kind where you draw a smiley face, on the paper bag over her head?
Those are gone.
Only when you grasp this understanding, will a realistic and possible course of action be available.
Ladies and gentlemen,
We have information warfare.
Wielded by Giant?
Yes. But it's a private ritual, not heavily vetted or gate-kept, especially with a sponsorship or introduction.
As a 35-year lapsed Catholic, without confirmation, I could easily take communion in this city. I will never get an invitation to see the Pope, or witness the real dealings of the Vatican bank.
Likewise, because there are garden variety freemasons, that doesn't disprove the secret society as an actor in crypto-politics and crypto-economics. In fact, these things are a part of established record.
This is the result of "humanitarian intervention".
Ghadaffi is less evil than NATO. By an order of magnitude.
I mean, if you put a wad of foil in the microwave, you can get the thing to fry itself.
Would clothing with ceramic magnets in it do this to a backscatter xray or a tetrahertz mw scanner? I'm sure there's something short of an EMP that would at least deny service by such a device. Perhaps even scatter the same harmful radiation back on its operators?
This is an interesting line of inquiry. Like most forms of security, there are unexplored use cases that were never properly modelled for threat. I'm thinking this seems like an excellent practical topic for something we'd expect to see at DefCon - like this year's defeat of the CLIQ technology electro-mechanical high-security locks, mandated by Federal government.
I don't advocate this - simply applaud the ingenuity and sentiment.
Thoughts, anyone?
"the ANSI standard 'is not applicable to covert operations.' " parses alright. Still, for certainty of context, I'd like to read this in the original German language.
Is not subject to the constraint of public law.
Consent of the governed is not required or desirable.
Carry on.
Made out like a bandit.
There's a rich man or two, after this "Solyndra" scam was used by insiders to funnel 500Mil. Mark my words.
You live in a Kleptocracy. The "foreign competitiveness" front sound very plausible. That's why the whole "green technology boondoggle/buble exists. Not that it might not be needed - but any affair involving billionaires will be used for private extraction. We live in the "post-economic" era, where the pretense of an economy is used to commit outrageous crimes.
To bring it back home?
"We'll never get to the world of Star Trek, without bombing Belgrade and Tripoli! We need humanitarian intervention!"
http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/264006_137311913016487_100002130376882_282364_1460330_n.jpg
In fact, "Star Trek" despite its desirability and delightfulness, is really just propaganda for an impossibility: The peaceful yet militarised, multilateral society that resorts to force only to enforce its ethical vision.
It is the story an elite wants its liberal, middle classes to believe, as it pursues a globalist agenda. It has the fantastical elements of unlimited vistas of frontier, with no barrier to resource consumption or constraint on availability.
Star Trek is the wet dream for the New World Order.
Jon was the power behind the throne.
There are Catholic churches everywhere. It's easy to be confirmed, and take regular communion.
There's also a Vatican, a Vatican bank - and circles-within-circles of secret initiation and lineage, some with "occult pretensions".
The presence of the former is not a disqualifier of the latter, nor does it dilute - but rather conceals.
If you can't tell the difference, or don't wish to investigate the difference between the neighbourhood ring-and-fez lodge from, say "Propaganda Due" - then you are perfectly within your rights.
And the top-level aprons are pleased with you exercising them.
I think that it is at least worthy of consideration, the historical connection that people like MacGregor Mathers and Aleister Crowley made, between the Golden Dawn, OTO and freemasonry.
This guy was probably just looking for better connections with local business leaders, and a sense of belonging with purpose:
http://img.ibtimes.com/www/data/images/full/2011/07/23/136344-anders-behring-breivik.jpg
Hey! Port it to Linux!
Agencies. ;-)
Thanks for your insight. It's always nice to get a view of how others might see things from the outside of a situation.
In this case, I believe the class of "others" in question is that of the closeted homosexual.
Isn't that the name of the Evil Necromancer from some supernatural pot-boiler?
Either that, or the Jewish Aleister Crowley.