GP a point, I pointed out that he may have overlooked something and he clarified his point.
You know, a nice disourse like adults have.
Then you come bounding in here, firing off a flamebait mod because of...
What? There's no insult, the tome was normal and there was no inappropriate behavior by either of us.
Mod, you're an idiot and you moderation was garbage. if you don't like my completley accurate observation, stop hiding your cowardly ass behind bad moderation and discuss what you think is wrong.
You are consistently, and nearly exclusively, a confrontational asshole when you engage others in discussion.
I don't care about your equivocations, justifications, or excuses and I certainly am not going to fall for your schoolyard "I know you are but what am I" nonsense, it might fit in with how you debate, but I'm not debating you.
You are an asshole. You know operaghost? So what you're still an asshole. I said things that you don't like? So what you're still an asshole. You think I'm a hypocrite because that's your standard response to criticism, as though criticizing you in an effort to improve the discourse is equivalent to you mindlessly attacking people even when they're right like you admitted I was about you being an asshole?
Guess what? You're still an asshole.
Get it? I'm not going to play your misdirection games asshole, you are responsible for lowering the level of discourse with your antics, and my actions in no way change that, no matter how many unrelated points you throw out to obscure the fact.
Nothing you say about me, nothing you do, no point you make, no argument you try, no insult you use changes the irrefutable fact that you are a confrontational asshole, have admitted it, and are now embarrassing yourself in a vaib attempt to mitigate it.
Because continuously maintaining your assholishness and attacking people who try to improve discourse is so much more mature and adult than you just not being an asshole.
"You do not get to come up with an arbitratry third category of "didn't break the law but I still don like him" and then persecute people in that category..."
Unless that person is a racist. Or a sexist. Or a homophobe...
Now that I think about it, yes actually, we do get to do that, or at least, it's being done, despite what you seem to think.
If you could back up your argument, there wouldn't ber a trail of posts from me asking for a quote that shows you weren't lying, followed by a trail of posts making bullshit excuses with links that lead to nothing resembling what you claim.
I find it ironic that you lie about being able to back up your "arguments" when there's a long trail of me asking you to do that and you failing.
The best part though is that you admitted you aren't very smart and prrobably don't even realize it.
Please spare me the opinion, I asked you several times for a quote you have yet to provide.
In light of the fact that you posted a BS link, and have claimed you did provide thr quote as a result, I have to assume you're not going to provide the quote and were lying.
Yeah, I know you're kind of kidding, but posts like GP make me sad, mostly because someone can remain intentionally ignorant, and still have their vote count as much as mine.
Of course, I'll probably be subjected to attack, because repeating bullshit claims about Obama the Muslim terrorist is evil, but doing it about a Republican is considered a public service around here.
God how desperate are you, no one gives a fuck about that nothing story outside of people who have a direct, vested interest in smearing the candidate.
Second, please post the entire quote that proves what you're claiming she thinks is true.
what the fuck are you mods smoking that open partisan slander rises to the level of insightful to you?
And to answer the question, she's smart enough to get elected governor of Alaska, in addition to her previous achievements.
But let's pretend like the work she's actually accomplished is somehow dispatched by some ridiculous nonsense, sure that's genius.
I'd just to say a big "grow the fuck up" to those of you who think your sides talking points are useful in discussing the quality of a person's job performance.
Nonsense, were your brake lights not working? Then why on earth do you think a normal predictable behavior other drivers see every day would suddenly fling them into chaos?
No, sorry, you did just about everything wrong in that story and your reason why just doesn't make a damned bit of sense.
I made my argument clrear from the start, your fgailure to understand it is a result of your reading comprehension issues.
Last, if you expected me to kow tow to your desires for how this discussion progresses, maybe you should have avoided relying on nice sounding but useless logical fallacies and statements like "you didn't present evidence I asked for so you obviously don't have it".
I'm not your fucking mother, I don't respond to stupid attempts to reroute the discussion, and the time for you to address you ignorance of the subject was BEFORE you shared your opinion, not halfway through a discussion you knew you were losing.
The worst part is you really think you're making an intelligent argument.
Slashdot Mirror
GP a point, I pointed out that he may have overlooked something and he clarified his point.
You know, a nice disourse like adults have.
Then you come bounding in here, firing off a flamebait mod because of...
What? There's no insult, the tome was normal and there was no inappropriate behavior by either of us.
Mod, you're an idiot and you moderation was garbage. if you don't like my completley accurate observation, stop hiding your cowardly ass behind bad moderation and discuss what you think is wrong.
You know, how adults who aren't idiots do.
You are consistently, and nearly exclusively, a confrontational asshole when you engage others in discussion.
I don't care about your equivocations, justifications, or excuses and I certainly am not going to fall for your schoolyard "I know you are but what am I" nonsense, it might fit in with how you debate, but I'm not debating you.
You are an asshole. You know operaghost? So what you're still an asshole. I said things that you don't like? So what you're still an asshole. You think I'm a hypocrite because that's your standard response to criticism, as though criticizing you in an effort to improve the discourse is equivalent to you mindlessly attacking people even when they're right like you admitted I was about you being an asshole?
Guess what? You're still an asshole.
Get it? I'm not going to play your misdirection games asshole, you are responsible for lowering the level of discourse with your antics, and my actions in no way change that, no matter how many unrelated points you throw out to obscure the fact.
Nothing you say about me, nothing you do, no point you make, no argument you try, no insult you use changes the irrefutable fact that you are a confrontational asshole, have admitted it, and are now embarrassing yourself in a vaib attempt to mitigate it.
Because continuously maintaining your assholishness and attacking people who try to improve discourse is so much more mature and adult than you just not being an asshole.
Yeah, how dare I expect adults to behave as such!
Well done!
You responded to my post by confronting me and being an asshole about it. Nice job.
"Why don't you try to refute the point..."
Because maybe I agree, but am tired of loudmouthed confrontational jackasses like you dominating the discussion and lowering the level of discourse?
Why don't you stop presuming people who respond to you but don't rush to slurp you are in oppositon to your points?
Probably because, as you admit, you're a confrontational asshole and, as such, don't have the social skills to do so.
"You do not get to come up with an arbitratry third category of "didn't break the law but I still don like him" and then persecute people in that category..."
Unless that person is a racist. Or a sexist. Or a homophobe...
Now that I think about it, yes actually, we do get to do that, or at least, it's being done, despite what you seem to think.
If you could back up your argument, there wouldn't ber a trail of posts from me asking for a quote that shows you weren't lying, followed by a trail of posts making bullshit excuses with links that lead to nothing resembling what you claim.
I find it ironic that you lie about being able to back up your "arguments" when there's a long trail of me asking you to do that and you failing.
The best part though is that you admitted you aren't very smart and prrobably don't even realize it.
You can look forward to me reminding you of the fact that I caught you lying.
Now you can frequent slashdot again, congratulations liar.
Why are you such a confrontational asshole?
The NBA has a hard cap for individual salaries.
Please spare me the opinion, I asked you several times for a quote you have yet to provide.
In light of the fact that you posted a BS link, and have claimed you did provide thr quote as a result, I have to assume you're not going to provide the quote and were lying.
You and I are done, have a nice day.
I love how you think the approval ratings now have anything to do with the quality of job he's done.
That such a gross, obvious, ridiculous fail on your part.
You're really not very smart are you?
And, not surprisingly, your link doesn't point to a quote of any kind.
Maybe you shouldn't be such a dick when you're caught making shit up.
It stands for "where's the quote to support your ridiculous bullshit assertion".
Seriously, IMHO? HO?
You act like your smart enough that it shouldn't have been a problem for you...
Quote please. No excuses, thanks.
You the second person making that claim that I've asked for a quote from, so please demonstrate either of them said that as you claim.
Where's that quote I asked for?
And honestly, after your previous post, your HO isn't very credible.
I imagine if you asked Alaskans, they remind you of the boatloads of public works projects and large amounts of money he brought in.
You seem to think the fact that he's also a criminal somehow cancels out the work he did for those people, and I imagine they'd disagree.
And what does that have to do with anything, really?
You're a perfect example of the kind of person I was referencing, all talking points and no knowledge of what is really going on.
You'll notice one of the partisan mods I was referencing decided to try and censor me, rather than respond to my points.
That's what trying to have rational discussions will get you around here.
Yeah, I know you're kind of kidding, but posts like GP make me sad, mostly because someone can remain intentionally ignorant, and still have their vote count as much as mine.
Of course, I'll probably be subjected to attack, because repeating bullshit claims about Obama the Muslim terrorist is evil, but doing it about a Republican is considered a public service around here.
You people are ruining my country.
First, "troopergate"? REALLY?
God how desperate are you, no one gives a fuck about that nothing story outside of people who have a direct, vested interest in smearing the candidate.
Second, please post the entire quote that proves what you're claiming she thinks is true.
what the fuck are you mods smoking that open partisan slander rises to the level of insightful to you?
And to answer the question, she's smart enough to get elected governor of Alaska, in addition to her previous achievements.
But let's pretend like the work she's actually accomplished is somehow dispatched by some ridiculous nonsense, sure that's genius.
I'd just to say a big "grow the fuck up" to those of you who think your sides talking points are useful in discussing the quality of a person's job performance.
"Then it was just very sad"
I imagine realizing your opinion is not representative of reality is indeed very sad.
"Slowing down wasn't an opton..."
Nonsense, were your brake lights not working? Then why on earth do you think a normal predictable behavior other drivers see every day would suddenly fling them into chaos?
No, sorry, you did just about everything wrong in that story and your reason why just doesn't make a damned bit of sense.
Just so I'm clear, you were 100% proficient in every skill you tried from the first time you tried it right?
Well, not everyone has the Taskmaster's powers, and for them, a margin of safety may be necessary, even if it's parentally enforced.
Yes, it IS clear, that you are in fact the troll.
I made my argument clrear from the start, your fgailure to understand it is a result of your reading comprehension issues.
Last, if you expected me to kow tow to your desires for how this discussion progresses, maybe you should have avoided relying on nice sounding but useless logical fallacies and statements like "you didn't present evidence I asked for so you obviously don't have it".
I'm not your fucking mother, I don't respond to stupid attempts to reroute the discussion, and the time for you to address you ignorance of the subject was BEFORE you shared your opinion, not halfway through a discussion you knew you were losing.
The worst part is you really think you're making an intelligent argument.
At least, it seems like you're kidding, but I fully expect to see someone (more than one person actually) seriously trying to make that argument.
"Well, you try putting up with a screaming kid in the middle of the store..." or something like that.
And they'll genuinely think it's valid. Scary.
They have that power already.
What a silly headline...
You don't need a law degree, just a willingness to read up on the subject.
So, honestly, you have no excuse for your ignorance.
I called you a troll, and you keep proving it true.