It would be really nice to know how Google Closure compares to GWT at a technical level. Of course, it's pretty clear to see how they differ at a high level: GWT is written in Java and compiled to JavaScript, and Closure seems to be an all JavaScript system with UI libraries and templating features. I'd just love to know more about their comparative analysis of their internals and targeted usage scenarios.
Slashdot Mirror
A better (international) example: Police police police, police police.
Understood as: Police (whom) police police, police police.
You can make an arbitrary long (true) sentences: [Police (whom) police]^n police, police [police (whom) police]^(n-1) police.
Of course, you can parse this sentence many ways, in a grammatically correct form, however the sentence is no longer tautological.
Space is so far out man!
but I consider it carry-on.
It would be really nice to know how Google Closure compares to GWT at a technical level. Of course, it's pretty clear to see how they differ at a high level: GWT is written in Java and compiled to JavaScript, and Closure seems to be an all JavaScript system with UI libraries and templating features. I'd just love to know more about their comparative analysis of their internals and targeted usage scenarios.
Must be new math kids.
Base 20 is the new base 10.
For the first time ever I actually genuinely laughed at a Slashdot meme.
Now just imagine, a whole beowulf cluster of nested citations. [[[...]]]
All in jest, infinite that is.