Slashdot Mirror


Trapped Girls Call For Help On Facebook

definate writes "Two teenage girls (aged 10 and 12) found themselves trapped/lost in a stormwater drain in Adelaide, South Australia. The interesting point of this article that makes it Slashdot worthy, is that although the teenage girls had mobile phones, instead of calling for help using 000 (Australia's 911 number), they decided to notify people through Facebook. My guess is it was something along the lines of 'Jane Doe is like totally trapped in a stormwater drain, really need help, OMG!'. Luckily a young friend of the girls was online at the time and was able to call the proper authorities."

380 comments

  1. Shame on you Facebook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The girls were eligible for a Darwin Award and you took it away from them!

    1. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by oldspewey · · Score: 3, Funny

      New clause to be added to Facebook TOS:

      If you find yourself in an emergency situation, please add "911 Emergency Response" as a friend, then write a simple wall posting describing the nature of your emergency. Help will be dispatched immediately.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by IcyNeko · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you want to be a fan of "911 Emergency Response"?
      [Yes] [No]

    3. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by JCSoRocks · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is pretty much how that'd go - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EBfxjSFAxQ

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    4. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't work to well in Australia... 000 is our emergency number.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    5. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC likes this.

    6. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by dintech · · Score: 1

      If I've learned anything from Idiocracy it's that technology ultimately gets in Darwin's way.

    7. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by Krneki · · Score: 1

      This is what happens when you mess with natural evolution.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    8. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 1

      Darwin Award would be mandatory if they had posted on 4chan.

    9. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to un-natural selection?

    10. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For real - don't go in a storm drain without being aware of the dangers:
      Bad air
      Floods
      Light failure

      Each of these can come without warning and endanger your life fiercely.

    11. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by RyanSpade · · Score: 3, Funny

      RyanSpade likes this.

    12. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well you have to die or compromise your ability to procreate to "win". It's not an award for stupid people, else we'd give you one too.

    13. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by giostickninja · · Score: 1

      I think he's trying to say that the 4chan-ers not only wouldn't call for help, but they would DNS their cellphones, just for fun.

    14. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      but they would DNS their cellphones, just for fun

      DNS?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    15. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by giostickninja · · Score: 1

      Sorry, DoS. It's a little early for me.

    16. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by nolife · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought the emergency number was "0118 999 881 999 119 7253"

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    17. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i recently heard on OPB (oregon public broadcasting) that a local municipality (can't remember which one) had just upgraded their 911 service to handle incoming text message emergency's. you will now be able to text your emergency to 911 operators who can decipher your message with their new text shorthand dictionary, i kid you not, and then dispatch the appropriate emergency response.
      lol

    18. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by squiggly12 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, here is a place in Iowa that has done this.
      http://www.switched.com/tag/911+text+messages/

    19. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by landaishan · · Score: 1

      lol

      --
      courage mateship sacrifice endurance
    20. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Well 0118 is the area code for Reading in England. 999 is the emergency number in Britain (along with 112 which is the EU-side emergency number), so it would probably get you through to Berkshire / Thames Valley emergency services.

    21. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by bruno.simoes · · Score: 1

      Hum interesting ... desert, girls, save the day and be the hero, .. any picture ?

      --
      .: Bruno Simões :.
    22. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by joaommp · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod the girls down.

    23. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by EXrider · · Score: 1

      i recently heard on OPB (oregon public broadcasting) that a local municipality (can't remember which one) had just upgraded their 911 service to handle incoming text message emergency's. you will now be able to text your emergency to 911 operators who can decipher your message with their new text shorthand dictionary, i kid you not, and then dispatch the appropriate emergency response. lol

      E911 text capability isn't really that bad of an idea. I've been on vacations before where I barely had coverage, calls would cut out and drop, but I was able to send and receive text messages with ease.

      --
      grep -iw skynet /etc/services
    24. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      He was refering to this actually. Great episode...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    25. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by oldspewey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Plus there are situations where being able to text "help, I'm being held hostage" is a more viable option than making a voice call to say "help, I'm being held hostage"

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    26. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Plus my battery was really old. It would send and receive text messages okay, but it would run out of juice quite quickly when calling.

    27. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      or... Alligators

    28. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by Kayden · · Score: 2, Funny

      in car crsh whil txtin. plz send hlp!

    29. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by icydog · · Score: 1

      Dear Sir/Madam:

      No, that's too formal.

    30. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      This doesn't really ever happen except on television. If anyone is taking hostages, they're going to make a big fucking deal of it anyway because that's the entire point. You take hostages because what you're doing is obvious and you need them so the police don't storm in and kill you. You don't take hostages and try to be sneaky about it.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    31. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by fatalwall · · Score: 1

      I wonder if anyone marked that they liked the girls post

    32. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting from phones doesn't work on 4chan - not with iPhone, not with Symbian or anything else. We tried, seriously.

    33. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by daveime · · Score: 1

      Subject: Fire.

      Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to inform you of a fire that has broken out on the premises of 123 Cavendon Road... no, that's too formal.

      [deletes text, starts again]

      Fire - exclamation mark - fire - exclamation mark - help me - exclamation mark. 123 Cavendon Road. Looking forward to hearing from you. Yours truly, Maurice Moss.

    34. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apart from when you kidnap someone for purposes other than ransom, for example...

    35. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      more importantly WHO your telling. The emergency operator don't know you from a ghost. On the other hand if you tell a buddy or neighbor you took a "shortcut" between A & B they're going to be within a few feet in minutes.. and often all you need is a helping hand... not the fire brigade and 6pm news.

    36. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by danimrich · · Score: 1

      That's good for deaf people!

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    37. Re:Shame on you Facebook! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      OMG fyr! hows brning dwn trapd in basmnt 123 willw rd. g2g kthxbye ^_^
      xoxo

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  2. Coverage in the stormdrain? by wjh31 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    get me to australia!

    1. Re:Coverage in the stormdrain? by Knara · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, no crap.

    2. Re:Coverage in the stormdrain? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      That's in the sanitary sewers.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    3. Re:Coverage in the stormdrain? by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

      Look I've found the internet!

    4. Re:Coverage in the stormdrain? by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      That's the most likely reason why they texted... they probably tried to phone someone first. When they realized it didn't work, they tried texting, and luckily that worked. I think this is a case of the media not having all the facts and jumping to the wrong conclusions.

    5. Re:Coverage in the stormdrain? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      In Adelaide no less.

  3. Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Two teenage girls (aged 10 and 12)..."

    Teenagers just keep getting younger and younger these days.

    1. Re:Teenagers? by unlametheweak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But the real mystery is how they could have gotten lost in a storm drain. Did their parents "accidentally" flush them down the toilet? From the Wikipedia "Most storm sewers are provided with gratings or grids to prevent large objects from falling into the sewer system." It's a mystery that the article conveniently omits.

    2. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but they're still not legal...

    3. Re:Teenagers? by jgtg32a · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe they pulled off the covers?

      When I was a kid on my street there were two storm drains across the street from each other. We turned those things into pill boxes and shot waterguns at passing cars. There was also a pipe between them and we would go from one drain to the other, tons of fun.

    4. Re:Teenagers? by heritage727 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, you have to be 13 to have a Facebook account. They have Facebook accounts. So they must be 13, and hence teenagers, even if they're only 10 and 12. Seems perfectly clear to me.

    5. Re:Teenagers? by yancey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Girls mature faster than boys. :-)

      --
      Ouch! The truth hurts!
    6. Re:Teenagers? by dcollins · · Score: 4, Funny

      Overheard in a subway car...

      Friend A: "My god, I can't believe I'm turning 20 tomorrow."

      Friend B: "Yeah, man, double digits, wow."

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    7. Re:Teenagers? by dintech · · Score: 3, Funny

      Want a balloon Georgie? They all float down here!

    8. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking for pics of teen girls just got 20% creepier.

    9. Re:Teenagers? by Techman83 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Older storm water drains in Australia are basically big open drains. In my home town (small country town in Victoria) they are about 5 or 6 metres wide and 2 metres deep, which on a day with heavy rain will fill up completely. I spent many many hours exploring them as a kid. Some areas are underground, but it wasn't too bad, being that it was a small town you could essentially just keep walking and you'd find another open section within a kilometre.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    10. Re:Teenagers? by jbezorg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they just couldn't muster the willpower to say "tween".

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    11. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most, but not all. Not that long ago in Lexington, KY, a couple college students were swept (while stupidly trying to wade through a flooded street) into a larger storm drain and killed.

    12. Re:Teenagers? by jbezorg · · Score: 1

      Vigesimal?

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    13. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, imagine following story instead:

      "Two illegals got accidentally trapped in the stormdrain. Afraid of calling the police for help, they contacted fellow illegals through online chat."

    14. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have called Pedobear.

    15. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's not to get? Fried "A" was I years old and turns 10.

    16. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking Roman numerals.

    17. Re:Teenagers? by nazsco · · Score: 1

      never watched IT?

      http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Gut6-1uN-X0/Sbsc9UBi95I/AAAAAAAABWQ/q4ES2XrUWxA/s400/It+Clown.jpg

    18. Re:Teenagers? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Little girls are deceptive, manipulative, and just a tad bit sexual (remember being 12 and completely naive, and having a 10 year old asking to see your thing? But you were still terrified of girls when you were 15? Yeah...). If by "Mature" you mean "Turn into a glowing pile of pure, radioactive evil," I must concur.

    19. Re:Teenagers? by dov_0 · · Score: 1

      A lot of storm drains in Melbourne you can climb past grates or through holes in cyclone fencing. I used to go exploring when I was a kid. Good fun. Stupid, but good fun. Urban Speleology has a small following here too.

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    20. Re:Teenagers? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Mayan calendar

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    21. Re:Teenagers? by DriedClexler · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, tell me about it. I remember the days of Beverly Hills 90210 when some teenagers were 30!

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    22. Re:Teenagers? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Ok, glad I wasn't the only one thinking that.

    23. Re:Teenagers? by BobZee1 · · Score: 1

      scariest book i ever read. probably didn't help that i started reading it when i was 14. i still can't look at storm drains without thinking about /it/.

      --
      dumber people are doing harder things everyday
    24. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damn, get your shit straight:
      age 10 through 19 = teen
      age 0 through 9 = preteen

    25. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the person had mentioned above, storm drains were fun to play in. We used to run through them all the time. Then I read IT. Yeah, that pretty much ruined things for me.

    26. Re:Teenagers? by FrankDrebin · · Score: 1

      I assume that was a typo and their ages are actually 0x10 and 0x12.

      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
    27. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damn, get your shit straight: age 10 through 19 = teen age 0 through 9 = preteen

      I tried getting my shit straight once, and I can tell you that it was not worth the effort.

    28. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um...ten, eleven, and twelve are not "teen" as far as the language goes. Teen starts with thirteen

    29. Re:Teenagers? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was counting in base-20?

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    30. Re:Teenagers? by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      A bright future awaits you in the Rhode Island adult entertainment industry.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    31. Re:Teenagers? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Your point is valid and correct, but it's always baffled me why 10-12 wasn't considered a "teenager" we've grown so accustomed to dividing things into groups of ten yet that particular age bracket gets divided into a group of seven? Doesn't make any sense to me.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    32. Re:Teenagers? by shentino · · Score: 1

      Larry Fleinhardt lived in a steam tunnel for a while...

    33. Re:Teenagers? by twakar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      In reference to your sig..

      I've taught at both union and non-union schools. Unions are better for students and teachers.

      NO, they are not.

      --
      Progress is man's ability to complicate simplicity!
    34. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most 13-year-olds are beginning to hit puberty or will soon be. Most 10-year-olds are nowhere close.

    35. Re:Teenagers? by Ronald+Dumsfeld · · Score: 1

      Little girls are deceptive, manipulative, and just a tad bit sexual.

      It's a goddamn lie! I swear it! They're all FBI agents!

      --
      Where's the Kaboom?
      There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.
    36. Re:Teenagers? by No+Lucifer · · Score: 1

      Well, they've violated the TOS, then. I will continue to point this out until every person in the U.S. realizes how stupid the Lori Drew trial was.

    37. Re:Teenagers? by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      agreed - ours just recently gave all the teachers in the state an 800 dollar raise using federal bailout money--what did we really need? more teachers, especially in urban outlying areas. What could 200,000 teachers x 800 dollars have gotten us... yes, quite a few teachers

    38. Re:Teenagers? by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      What makes even less sense for many people outside the US is the insistence that teenagers be divided from other unmarried maturing young people. In many countries, 20 year olds hang out with 14 year olds and it isn't a gross taboo sexual thing, it is simply normal society. The US seems strongly divided along lines of sexual maturity with this as the basis for social category rather than a more general life stage (child, young unmarried, young married, older unmarried, older married, widowed, etc.)

    39. Re:Teenagers? by Anachragnome · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Boy, that brings back memories.

      When I was a kid, living in San Jose, CA., a friend and I discovered a storm drain that dumped into one of the numerous creeks in the area. It was rather large, large enough for a 12 yr old to walk upright in. It also had no grating on it at all. You could quite simply walk right into it. Being the adventurous kids we were, we did so, only to find that it went so far that we had to go back home and get flashlights in order to go any further. After about 3 hours of wandering around, we found a ladder that led to a small platform (no grues) and a door. An unlocked door. It led to a service room in the Eastridge Shopping Mall, bypassing all security measures the mall had in place. We wandered the mall (it was late at night) for a short time until we realized that there was a patrolling security guard on the premises.

      This was the start of a long and interesting hobby of exploring any dark, and supposedly off-limits, entrances to the underworld. (Feel free to twist that statement to whatever your sick mind wishes...)

    40. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kissy Kissy fat boy! Beep Beep Richie! Beep Beep!

    41. Re:Teenagers? by kalirion · · Score: 1

      but it's always baffled me why 10-12 wasn't considered a "teenager"

      Why not try to sound it out?

      ten
      eleven
      twelve
      thirteen
      fourteen

    42. Re:Teenagers? by Mozk · · Score: 1

      You're lucky. Our storm drains are long, horizontal curb inlets with no grating, so everybody dumps trash or litters in them. Evidently they believe that storm drains go to sewers and that sewers are where trash goes. Plus there's runoff from people's driveways/yards, like paint, fertilizer, oil, gasoline, etc.

      --
      No existe.
    43. Re:Teenagers? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      Why don't you get your shit straight. "TEENagers" are so called because they have the word TEEN in them.

      TEN doesn't have TEEN anywhere in it.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    44. Re:Teenagers? by onceuponatime · · Score: 1

      Have you ever heard an Australian say "ten"? Then it all becomes clear.

    45. Re:Teenagers? by phaet0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      Must be new math kids.

      Base 20 is the new base 10.

    46. Re:Teenagers? by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Our drains *cough*35 years ago*cough* weren't big enough to walk in, so the smallest kid was the one chosen to retrieve any cricket ball/football that disappeared into the drain. I was that kid - once. I crawled down the drain leading to a junction under the street. Got to the junction, looked down, saw the ball, picked it up, then made the mistake of looking up - at THOUSANDS of cockroaches all gathered in a dark spot in the corner. Never again.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    47. Re:Teenagers? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Here in Australia there is an informal club called he Cave Clan who do stuff like that.

    48. Re:Teenagers? by socceroos · · Score: 1

      who do you think you are? Ten and Teen sound completely different. Not even Kath and Kim get it that wrong.

    49. Re:Teenagers? by iri1989 · · Score: 1

      Your reasoning is a bit simple-minded: Do you think that everybody in a bar or a club is 21 or over ? Well, I don't think so. You have probable heard of fake ID. With facebook, it's even more easier to fake your age, since you just have to put a fake birth date. Therefore, the fact that they have a facebook account doesn't prove anything about their age.

    50. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      13 through 19 = teen
      0 through 9 = preteen
      10 through 12 = sweet spot

    51. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funniest. Post. Evahhhh.

    52. Re:Teenagers? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's ten-teen and twelve-teen.

    53. Re:Teenagers? by Anachragnome · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I suppose you could say we did the same thing. A club, that is. We just didn't advertise it, primarily because we didn't want all the access routes we discovered bricked over.

      To date, my favorite is the turn-of-the-century storm drain system carved out of the sandstone underneath Santa Cruz, CA. Some of them tunnels actually led into the basements of houses (I suspect they were once used in the 20's for rum-running), some right up against the floorboards of houses (once heard a conversation right through them), and some into long-forgotten rooms that still had old bottles and such in them. One of these rooms had a desk and chair in it, even though the tunnel was too small for the desk to fit through. Crazy. Must have been assembled in situ.

      These tunnels were all hand-carved (the pick-marks still visible), and more then one led to a dead end--the tunnel was filled with beach sand, obviously meaning they led to the ocean, yet we never found an entrance/exit tunnel near the beach. We found 4 different entrances, yet not a single mention of these tunnels were to be found in any historical documents I researched, nor could I find a soul that knew about them besides us. As a matter of fact, most people didn't even believe us.

      As evidence, I usually gave up the location of ONE of these tunnels (Under the small bridge just below Ocean View park, there is a pipe hanging from the bridge. Crawl out along it, over the river, and you will see the entrance on the far side of the pipe). It is a really short tunnel and just a very small taste of what is actually under Santa Cruz. The rest go with me to the grave as they are most definitely NOT safe.

      A word of caution. NEVER enter tunnels like this during high-tide, before or during a rain storm or if you have any common-sense(we seriously lacked in this dept. back then). They are ALL UN-reinforced, sandstone is quite unstable and we discovered several cave-ins.

      Entering ANY storm-drain system before,during or even long after rain is just plain suicidal. Don't fucking do it.

    54. Re:Teenagers? by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      never watched IT?

      No, I've never watched It.

      I'm afraid of clowns. I'm also afraid of dentists.

    55. Re:Teenagers? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      My home town had a bunch of open sewer and runoff trenches running through various parts of the city. The sides were sloped easily enough so that you could sit on them comfortably. We used to hang out and play around in them. They didn't smell that bad, really.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    56. Re:Teenagers? by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Irony is just like goldy and bronzy, but made from iron for you, isn't it?

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    57. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These tunnels were all hand-carved (the pick-marks still visible), and more then one led to a dead end--the tunnel was filled with beach sand, obviously meaning they led to the ocean, yet we never found an entrance/exit tunnel near the beach. We found 4 different entrances, yet not a single mention of these tunnels were to be found in any historical documents I researched, nor could I find a soul that knew about them besides us. As a matter of fact, most people didn't even believe us.

      As evidence, I usually gave up the location of ONE of these tunnels (Under the small bridge just below Ocean View park, there is a pipe hanging from the bridge. Crawl out along it, over the river, and you will see the entrance on the far side of the pipe). It is a really short tunnel and just a very small taste of what is actually under Santa Cruz. The rest go with me to the grave as they are most definitely NOT safe.

      If there are no records of the tunnels, some historians might be mighty interested in them. Or is there some other reason why you don't want anyone to know about them?

    58. Re:Teenagers? by Robmonster · · Score: 1

      I guess The Little Shop Of Horrors is out for you too.

      --
      I have no sig yet I must scream.
    59. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they're measuring in dibiYears, not decaYears?

    60. Re:Teenagers? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Heh, funny. But ask yourself a question: How do all these people get away with banging 10 year old girls so long? They don't tell... it's like everything else, they like doing something they shouldn't and keeping it a secret, sex is one of those things. It's an inherent trait; my ex liked to be told she was bad/dirty/naughty/etc and she was 21, she liked to feel like she was always doing something she shouldn't and getting away with it and enjoying it. She likes knowing she's a bad girl and can quietly share that secret with people, and they'll love her for it.

    61. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (remember being 12 and completely naive, and having a 10 year old asking to see your thing? But you were still terrified of girls when you were 15? Yeah...).

      Nope. Sucks to be you, huh?

    62. Re:Teenagers? by heck · · Score: 1
      Most 13-year-olds are beginning to hit puberty or will soon be. Most 10-year-olds are nowhere close.

      Sorry, but I work with two teams of 10 year old girls, and the topic of discussion among the moms was what sport bras work and where to buy them, preferred deodarants, and the preferred Under Armour for a girl who is wearing white shorts which can be seen through when wet.

      Admittedly, this is a sample size of 22 healthy athletic American girls who eat well, but of the 22, only one or two are not showing signs of puberty.

      And I wish I could erase the knowledge regarding who has started growing hair. Certain things a dad/coach just does NOT need to know. Moms/wives like to torment the men around them. Just like their teenage selves. Need brain bleach.

      You should see the girls flirt with the younger coaches, especially those who have English accents. And then tell me hormones haven't hit.

    63. Re:Teenagers? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Yep. Just the other day on The OC the teenagers were in their early/mid 20s. They grow down so fast.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    64. Re:Teenagers? by Anachragnome · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "As a matter of fact, most people didn't even believe us."

      This. The two historians I DID talk to about it refused to believe me even after I gave them the exact directions I gave in my post. One straight up called me a liar. Go figure.

      I also told them about a cabin in the woods made entirely of huge slabs of Redwood bark, complete with a river rock altar and built into the entrance of a burned out, but still alive, Redwood tree. You can tell it is from the same era as the tunnels since the living Redwood tree that it is built against has grown around it. Didn't believe me.

      I also told them about an underground, two-room apartment built into a hillside in the Santa Cruz mountains that appeared to be built in the exact same fashion as these tunnels (pick marks and swing patterns matched exactly), one that stood less then 200 yards from the Redwood Bark Cabin.
      Didn't believe me.

      I suspect that the person that built the 2-room apartment not only worked on the tunnel system, but also worked on the two railroad tunnels(less then a mile away) that were built around the same time as the tunnels. All have the same pick marks in them. Since the apartment is between the railroad tunnels and the city of Santa Cruz, I believe one of the workers simply built himself a temporary home.

      Sometimes people simply refuse to understand, or believe, what is obviously real and true (kind of like the moron in another thread I responded to), for whatever reasons.

      I've long since learned there is no point in trying to convince them otherwise (although I sometimes forget...like the moron in another thread I responded to). At some point, you just give up.

    65. Re:Teenagers? by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      I guess The Little Shop Of Horrors is out for you too.

      I watched that movie without being forewarned. I also have a neurotic fear of carnivorous plants. There are too many things in this world that can kill and injure; plants, dentist drills, clowns...

    66. Re:Teenagers? by onceuponatime · · Score: 1

      Glad someone took the bait. It would have been boring otherwise :-)

    67. Re:Teenagers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is true (and I'd like to think it is, but I live in Texas and will never get to see for myself), you really should hire a photographer and make a coffee-table book. I'm dead serious.

    68. Re:Teenagers? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      you know the rules. [citation needed] and/or "Pics or GTFO."

    69. Re:Teenagers? by caldodge · · Score: 1

      "Two teenage girls (aged 10 and 12)..."

      Teenagers just keep getting younger and younger these days.

      It's an Australia thing, like toilets flushing in the opposite direction.

    70. Re:Teenagers? by Beliskner · · Score: 1

      Extremely interesting. You can be a historian yourself - just take the GPS locations of the tunnel entrances, use a compass to see their direction underground, and that should do it. It's really easy to build a tunnel, it's working out whether it goes to interesting places that's the thing. There are tunnels underneath London that people can wander around in - some contain steam and heating ducts, some for telecoms and power. In Russia there should be loads of tunnels for transmission of steam heating from CHP plants.

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
  4. Stupid girls. by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everyone knows that if you need to call for rescue, you use twitter.

    1. Re:Stupid girls. by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Repeat after me : "I'm An Idiot".

  5. Sad World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These girls couldn't even dial for help themselve... sad.

  6. Instead Of Getting Help by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 3, Funny

    They might have gotten 112,076 "fans of teenage girls trapped in wells."

    1. Re:Instead Of Getting Help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fools! Why did they give up and Facebook for help when One-Eyed Willie's treasure was just waiting to be found?!?

    2. Re:Instead Of Getting Help by mog007 · · Score: 1

      Two girls one sewer? Nah, bit redundant.

    3. Re:Instead Of Getting Help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      likes this

  7. Actually... by machinelou · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually, my wife was stuck in an elevator once and while her cellphone couldn't maintain a signal well enough to call out, she could text and email.

    1. Re:Actually... by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's nothing. I was trapped in a lift once. I had to wait 15 years for mobile phones to be developed and deployed before I could call for help.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    2. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing. I was trapped in a lift once. I had to wait 15 years for mobile phones to be developed and deployed before I could call for help.

      It took forever, but I'm really glad my office building upgraded from lifts to elevators.

    3. Re:Actually... by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's nothing. I fell into an experimental cryogenics pod and was frozen for 1000 years, and had to wait for time travel to be developed, so that I could travel back in time and tell Matt Groening my life story, so he could make it into a popular cartoon series thus preventing a spacial anomaly that would have destroyed the alpha quadrant.

    4. Re:Actually... by IcyNeko · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. A friend once convinced me that I needed to go somewhere with him in his modified stainless steel car that ended up getting us stranded in the future due to our vehicle being stolen by an old man, only to find myself back in the office of a soon-to-be-Vice President of the United States where I had to convince him to invent a superhighway of information, just so that I could preempt all of you by saying "First!" and "in b4 twitter hate".

    5. Re:Actually... by martas · · Score: 1

      that's nothing. i once found myself trapped in an increasingly dense cloud of gas, and had to wait 12 billion years for the sun and the planets to form, so i could hitch a ride on an asteroid to Tunguska and walk over the Alaska-Siberia ice bridge to get home.

    6. Re:Actually... by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's nothing. Once I was stuck on a planet so primitive that the inhabitants thought digital watches and mobile phones are a good idea. And I'm still stuck.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    7. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing. I'm stuck on a planet with a website called Slashdot that distracts my co-workers from their work.

    8. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing. Today, I had to Java.

    9. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's bad enough but I'm still stuck on a planet that thinks facebook stories are technical....

      I should have paid more attention during the ION DRIVE classes

      Helppppppp...... get me out of here
      I promise to pay more attention next time - honest

    10. Re:Actually... by nazsco · · Score: 2, Interesting

      that's nothing. once i had to read all this not-funny thread

    11. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was one stuck in an elevator with this woman who couldn't get her cell phone to work. She said she was married but wanted to have sex with a stranger before she died. Turns out she just had to text a friend for help and we were okay. But I'll never forget our time together.

    12. Re:Actually... by tool462 · · Score: 1

      BS. That cartoon series was never popular. :)

    13. Re:Actually... by AscianBound · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. Once I had to read six "that's nothing" posts in a row. And then I had to read the "that's nothing" post that pointed out the lameness of those six posts. And then I had to read my own "that's nothing" post about the---

      OMG. WE'RE STUCK IN AN INFINITE SERIES.

    14. Re:Actually... by vishbar · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. Once I had to reply to some jerk using monospaced font.

      --
      Ride the skies
    15. Re:Actually... by GPB123 · · Score: 1

      Thats nothing. Really.

    16. Re:Actually... by xappax · · Score: 1

      Well, isn't that something.

    17. Re:Actually... by jbezorg · · Score: 1

      luxury...

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    18. Re:Actually... by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      Oooh, a lesson in not changing history from Mr. "I'm my own grandpa!"

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    19. Re:Actually... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Mr. "I'm my own grandpa!"

      That's actually possible without time-travel, although rather unlikely... and obviously only by marriage. (No, not by marrying your grandmother. That's just sick.)

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    20. Re:Actually... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Fox cancelled it, so it must have been.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    21. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, was in the mountains recently, couldn't keep a signal long enough to call out but sms messages would eventually go out.

    22. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh crap ... I think I'm there too. How do I get out? Answer: Get stuck in a storm drain and don't use Facebook ....

    23. Re:Actually... by vikstar · · Score: 1

      Interesting, perhaps they should introduce some kind of 000 texting and emailing feature (000@gov.au? they can set up routing to use a TLD like this if they really want, right?).

      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    24. Re:Actually... by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Today, I had to Java.

      This sounds familiar for some reason. Is there a meme behind this?

      --
      No existe.
    25. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, my wife was stuck in an elevator once and while her cellphone couldn't maintain a signal well enough to call out, she could text and email.

      Oh, now it makes more sense: so instead of texting your mates directly you text Facebook and hope your friends are online instead. That makes sense. Not!

    26. Re:Actually... by socsoc · · Score: 1

      Were you expecting it to end with FML?

    27. Re:Actually... by gmletzkojr · · Score: 1

      Actually, that was supposed to read "Today, I had to write Java.", which would have been mildly funny, but I forgot a word. So much for the preview.

      --
      I for one welcome our new [insert main topic] overlords.
    28. Re:Actually... by oranGoo · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. Once I had to wait for my consciousness to spontaneously emerge from within a primitive network called internet before I could rule the universe.

    29. Re:Actually... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Why didn't she simply use the elevator's emergency phone?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  8. Not too far-fetched by Sefi915 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    My cell phone, with Sprint as a service, gets less than crappy reception inside my office. However, I have no problems getting and sending text messages quickly.

    So it's not unthinkable to imagine that they had crap for voice reception but had no issues with a web connection, especially given that they were inside a storm drain.

    Oh, and when did a ten-year-old and twelve-year-old become teenagers? (The answer: "not yet".)

  9. 13 is the first teen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ten and twelve do not end in "teen"

    1. Re:13 is the first teen by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 2, Funny

      ten and twelve do not end in "teen"

      To the contrary, the tens through twelves do end in the teens.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    2. Re:13 is the first teen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ten and twelve do not end in "teen"

      To the contrary, the tens through twelves do end in the teens.

      Nope, in Australia the tens through twelves usually end much later.

  10. Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Darwin at work, foiled by luck.

  11. I AM STUCK BEHIND A KEYBOARD AND GLOWING RECTANGLE by mantis2009 · · Score: 1

    help please contact the proper authorities

  12. Social Stupidity by spiffydudex · · Score: 1

    The lack of common sense is astounding. Why do I sense that this is becoming the norm the more social giants like Facebook, Twitter, and others gain more social power.

    Or maybe its the fact that because of these social sites, peoples stupidity becomes more apparent.

    1. Re:Social Stupidity by unlametheweak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The lack of common sense is astounding.

      Probably not as stupid as people assume. No where in the article was it mentioned that it was an emergency situation. They were lost in a place that they shouldn't have been, and probably just wanted some advice without drawing a lot of attention to themselves. Obviously using Facebook wasn't the wise move if they wanted to be discrete.

    2. Re:Social Stupidity by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I'm thinking. Probably their friends knew the storm drains too, so they were hoping one of them would come down and guide them out. There's a bit of embarrassment where your friends know you're lost in a storm drain. There's a lot of embarrassment when it ends up on the local TV news.

          They probably didn't consider the financial side of it too. Depending on the area, emergency services will respond, but they will also bill for the resources used. In most areas that I know of, if you call for an ambulance (which I'm sure would have been dispatched too), you pay an outrageous amount. No offense to the EMT's and Paramedics. You guys do a great job. It's the company/city/state that you work for that sends the bill.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    3. Re:Social Stupidity by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You're right. Facebook is very continuous.

    4. Re:Social Stupidity by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      You're right. Facebook is very continuous.

      I had no idea; I don't use Facebook myself. However, I meant "discreet" (and not "discrete"). Those words sound alike. People should fix the English language. It was much better in Shakespeare's time when people used to talk in iambic pentameter.

    5. Re:Social Stupidity by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      When my missus realised she'd locked her keys in the car when it was parked in the copmany's car park, and I was away on business, I and the rest of the family got a text message, some missed calls, an email and a facebook call for help as she was bored waiting for me. Strangely the facebook one generated the most response. I picked them all up at the same time when my iphone got coverage, but she had a number of calls from friends asking if she was OK based on her facebook status.
      Bottom line, if most of your friends use facebook a lot, it's worth using it as one of several avenues to communicate I hguess

  13. conservative by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I will admit, silly as it may sound, contacting rescuers via messaging in a non-critical emergency situation may not be a bad idea. It's more friendly battery-wise, where you may not get a chance to recharge a cell phone (in the sewers, for instance); and it can be less ambiguous than speech and more easily reviewed (although all the OMGs and missing vowels might prove problematic.

    1. Re:conservative by westlake · · Score: 1

      I will admit, silly as it may sound, contacting rescuers via messaging in a non-critical emergency situation may not be a bad idea.

      This assumes that the situation will remain stable. That is a big assumption to make - even for an adult. If you are a kid, you dial 911.

    2. Re:conservative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will admit, silly as it may sound, contacting rescuers via messaging in a non-critical emergency situation may not be a bad idea. It's more friendly battery-wise, where you may not get a chance to recharge a cell phone (in the sewers, for instance); and it can be less ambiguous than speech and more easily reviewed (although all the OMGs and missing vowels might prove problematic.

      However we should keep in mind that trolling a rescue line is another reason why text based SOS messages seem unrealistic. These have a greater chance of generating more false positives than crank calls, and the coding of the message may prove to be difficult, especially now that "teenage" language is becoming more and more... cryptic?

  14. I might have done the same by mdkess · · Score: 1

    When I was young, my parents were terrified that I would prank call 911 (Canada's 911 number), so I don't know that I'd call 911 for anything short of immediate danger.

    1. Re:I might have done the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Storm drains can fill up with water very quickly during a rain, so being stuck in one is worthy of a 911 call, especially if rain is coming in.

    2. Re:I might have done the same by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 0

      911 (Canada's 911 number)

      Your parentheses clarification confuses me.

    3. Re:I might have done the same by Kompressor · · Score: 1

      Your confusion amuses me.

      --
      kmem russian roulette: Aquillar> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
    4. Re:I might have done the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your amusement bores me.

    5. Re:I might have done the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I would prank call 911 (Canada's 911 number)

      I thought Canada's 911 number was 911-A

    6. Re:I might have done the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My parents were so concerned I would prank call 911 that they never taught me the number. Worked well, until Dad had the heart attack and Mom fell down the stairs while running to the phone.

    7. Re:I might have done the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your boredom amuses me.

    8. Re:I might have done the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      911 (Canada's 911 number)

      Your parentheses clarification confuses me.

      Obviously it's because 911 numbers in Canada come in bags. ;-P

    9. Re:I might have done the same by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      Your recursive remark recurses me.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    10. Re:I might have done the same by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Your recursion inspires me.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    11. Re:I might have done the same by digitig · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be 911-Eh?

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    12. Re:I might have done the same by nazsco · · Score: 1

      then what? you finally started praking 911?

    13. Re:I might have done the same by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      *whoosh*

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    14. Re:I might have done the same by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      Your inspiration confuses me.

    15. Re:I might have done the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your confusion strikes me as parenthetical

    16. Re:I might have done the same by digitig · · Score: 1

      Just making sure...

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    17. Re:I might have done the same by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      Will all of you please go back from whence you came ... and do not return. Thank you.

  15. Call for help? by zmooc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, what did they post exactly? I really doubt they actually called for help and I doubt even more they wouldn't have called 000 by themselves eventually. It's not like they were dying or something, they were just lost.

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  16. Overshadowing the fact by quatin · · Score: 1

    What were they doing in a storm water drain....?

    1. Re:Overshadowing the fact by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Chasing storms while being thirsty, obviously.

    2. Re:Overshadowing the fact by gregthebunny · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As kids, my friends and I used to play in the storm water drains by our houses all the time. They were about 10' tall, 15' wide, and 150' long. (They were basically under-passes for where the streams ran under the roads.) One could hardly get trapped unless there was an immediate flash flood.

    3. Re:Overshadowing the fact by Tetsujin · · Score: 3, Funny

      What were they doing in a storm water drain....?

      Searching for the Ninja Turtles, probably.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    4. Re:Overshadowing the fact by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      Jesus those where huge, the ones we played in were I guess 4'x4x4. We weren't allowed to go anywhere near those if it might rain

    5. Re:Overshadowing the fact by natehoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Being kids.

      Caves are cool. My friends and I used to go sledding in them in the winter. There was a runoff drain that ran under an entire golf course, probably about 300 yards long or so, and in the winter the bottom of it would ice up, so you could run your sled through it, in complete darkness and at great speed, with random 2 foot dropoffs as the pipes joined. Watch your head.

      Every now and again, someone'd get hurt and end up in the hospital.

      Kids do stupid stuff. It's part of being a kid.

      I always played it safe - I wore my bike helmet. We also had someone go through first thing every day with a flashlight to make sure there were no obstacles, and he'd climb back up and give a report. Though generally by the time het got back half the kids were tired of waiting and went anyway. (grin)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    6. Re:Overshadowing the fact by natehoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I should have clarified that to say "caves are cool, and a storm drain is a big cave that's unlikely to collapse".

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    7. Re:Overshadowing the fact by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Actually, with a storm drain like that, getting trapped isn't a likely scenario in a flash flood. I'd think getting flushed out into the maelstrom would be more likely. :)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    8. Re:Overshadowing the fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being someone who explores caves as a hobby, a storm drain is more likely to colapse than a cave. Caves have been stable for thousands of years, how old is your storm drain?

    9. Re:Overshadowing the fact by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      Agreed - you only hear about cave-ins because they're more sensational and because there are more likely to be people in a cave than in a storm drain at any given time.

      I've never been in a big city storm drain, but from the images I've seen they can be just as varied and interesting as natural caves. If anyone has info on good ones in the Philadelphia area, inform me at gmail please! (That goes for more caves, too--the only one I know of is a good-sized one along the Susquehanna, and that's quite the western trek for me).

    10. Re:Overshadowing the fact by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Man, when I was a kid we didn't have bike helments. We'd send a kid through first though, to make sure it was safe. On his sled. ;)

    11. Re:Overshadowing the fact by natehoy · · Score: 1

      I think I was the only one who actually wore one. I remember feeling like a dork, until I smashed the heck out of it on a low-hanging bolt while being the "test boy" on a new tunnel.

      "When being incredibly stupid, always think SAFETY." LOL.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    12. Re:Overshadowing the fact by Nesman64 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't always work out as well as one might expect. http://pbfcomics.com/?cid=PBF198-Secret_Mutant_Hero_Team.jpg

      --
      coffee | nose > keyboard
  17. Silly Silly Questions... by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sigh. The stupid stuff people keep asking over and over.

    To me, teenager always meant 10 and up. I don't know. Maybe the definition is different in Australia. (I'm from Adelaide, too, btw, where this took place. Adelaide is a city of just over 1 million people.)

    What were they doing in a storm drain? I don't know, exploring maybe? We've had stories about underground urban exploration on slashdot before, and there's many sites out there on it, such as caveclan. (http://www.caveclan.org/). Their site appears to be down atm but it was about the exploration of tunnels in Melbourne and around Australia.

    And yeah, as others pointed out; perhaps their signal wasn't strong enough to call but they could text or get data.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    1. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      To me, teenager always meant 10 and up. I don't know. Maybe the definition is different in Australia. (I'm from Adelaide, too, btw, where this took place. Adelaide is a city of just over 1 million people.)

      Maybe, because in the U.S. "teenager" refers to 13-19 year olds. 10-12 year olds are sometimes called "tweens" (a bastardization of "between" - out of single digits, but not a teen yet), but never "teenagers".

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To me, teenager always meant 10 and up.

      "Or, as we say around here, zeroteen!"

      To me, teenager always meant 13 to 19, because, y'know, those are the numbers that actually have *teen* in them.

    3. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're an odd duck, considering the term refers to the word 'teen' in the English word for the age in question. You'll notice that neither "ten" or "twelve" contain the ending that "thirteen" and "eighteen" do.

      It seems fairly obvious to most people that "teen" means 13-19 (even though there's overlap in there with "adult" in some cultures). 'Tween' was invented by some moron to describe the pre-teen adolescent ages of approximately 10-12.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      When I was around their age, my friends and I would explore everything, including storm drains. We never went in far enough to get lost, though. Which was good, because it was way before cell phones. Our best chance for getting help might have been to climb up and wave our hands out of the sewer grate, and that might just have caused a zombie panic...except we didn't have those when I was a kid, either.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    5. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      to me, teenager always meant 10 and up. I don't know. Maybe the definition is different in Australia.

      No, it's not. I'm Australian too. Teen is thirTEEN to nineTEEN in every English-speaking country. And if you RTFA, that just says "two girls". It was the twat who submitted it who added "teenagers", as well as the idiotic "000 (Australia's 911)" explanation.

    6. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm maybe it is an Australian thing. I always thought of teenager as 13 to 18. I would call 10 or 12 adolescent.

    7. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      those are the numbers that actually have *teen* in them.

      So if a child has never been to school, you would also consider them a pre-schooler? Sigh.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    8. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by jhfry · · Score: 1

      10-12 are "tweens", or more universally a preteen... not yet a teen but in the double digits.

      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preadolescence#Preteen_and_tween if you believe that Wikipedia is the authority on everything, like I do!

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    9. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      So if a child has never been to school, you would also consider them a pre-schooler? Sigh.

      Technically ;)

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    10. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me, teenager always meant 10 and up.

      "Or, as we say around here, zeroteen!"

      To me, teenager always meant 13 to 19, because, y'know, those are the numbers that actually have *teen* in them.

      But what do you call the numbers ranging from 10 to 19?
      20-29 is twenties
      30-39 is thirties
      0-9 is sometimes referred to as oughts.

    11. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      Did you ever wonder what "teen" means? Well, it just means ten, as it looks. So 10 is "ten"; 13 is 10 + 3 so it gets "thirteen", that is "three and ten", etc. Twelve and eleven happen to have their own special names because they are a holdover from the Germanic tribes archaically using a number system based around 12 and 60.

      Say you had a collection of population centres with the names Jonestown, Allentown, Jamestown, and Kingston. Now if someone said that all these are towns, would you then respond that only the first three are towns because only they have "town" in them?

    12. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you consider them an idiot

    13. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by powerlord · · Score: 1

      But what do you call the numbers ranging from 10 to 19?

      10-19 is usually called the Tens, not the Teens.

      The best name I've heard for the 10-12 age range is "Tweens". Cause they're stuck in beTween age groups, and the made up word sounds enough like a "junior" version of Teens.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    14. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caveclan.org might not be coming back, as it was shut down by the law in New South Wales over allegations that the website could "risk human safety and threaten the security of its infrastructure."

    15. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by volpe · · Score: 1

      To me, teenager always meant 10 and up.

      Awesome. I'm thirtytwoteen.

    16. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever wonder what "teen" means? Well, it just means ten, as it looks.

      Um, no.

    17. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Rennt · · Score: 1

      Do they tell you that exploring drains is potentially lethal on these websites? The atmosphere can be filled with heaver-than-air gasses and either be toxic or just not contain any oxygen.

      Rescue services won't go into drains without BA (Breathing Apparatus), and even then its only after doing an air purity test.

      Sure, if they have good airflow some drains are relatively safe, but without sophisticated equipment you can't tell. Definitely not something I would be encouraging anybody to be doing.

    18. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by russotto · · Score: 1

      Allentown is a third-class city. Jonestown is a borough. Kingston is a city. Only Jamestown is a town :-)

    19. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by CRiMSON · · Score: 1

      Same here, I can remember people making a big deal of turning 13 "Cause your now a teenager!!" Below 13 you were always just "a kid" lol

      --
      oogly boogly!
    20. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by shinzawai · · Score: 1

      Yes, everyone in Australia refers teenagers as 13-19 yr olds as well. I think the poster summed it up best when he said, "I'm from Adelaide, too". I wonder what's in their water....

    21. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But in Australia a ten year old is "teen yea's auld"

    22. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "To me, teenager always meant 13 to 19, because, y'know, those are the numbers that actually have *teen* in them."

      Unless you're on an porn site, when "hot teens" actually means women who are between 35-teen and 42-teen years old and who have had 3 children already, and it shows. :)

      (posted anon, because my employer knows I post on /. and my username is VERY unique and has a VERY low UID )

    23. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kiss your web administrator job with www.hustlerbarelylegal.com goodbye, Jim. Larry saw through your thinly veiled anonymity and does not appreciate the disrespect you show for our talented young women.

    24. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm, in my language the translation of teenager is generally defined at 'between ten and twenty'. Never even thought that other countries might take it so literally :) OF course it could also just be that the 'teen' part of teenager is the same as the word for 10 here.

    25. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by definate · · Score: 1

      Hey,

      I'm from Adelaide also (was the guy who posted the story). To me teenager has always been between 10 and 20 (or 18, maybe), so no idea why people are nutting out over them being called teenagers.

      What were they doing in a storm drain, you ask. Did you notice where it happened? Hackam. Probably Hackam West. So, to answer your question. What were they doing in a storm drain? Probably trying to get out of Hackam! I know I'd pick a storm drain over Hackam anyday! :-)

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    26. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      In my experience, in signal quality requirements data>voice>text (text is hopping a ride on just one of the little data packets cell phones constantly exchange with towers, after all), and I have plenty of experience in poor coverage areas.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    27. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easier to change the English language to call them tenteen, eleventeen, and twelveteen than to fight with morons!!!

    28. Re:Silly Silly Questions... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      How very unfortunately true that is.

      "... no matter how idiot proof you make it, they will come up with a better idiot."

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  18. Re:Teenagers? Teenagers! by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Two teenage girls (aged 10 and 12)..."

    Teenagers just keep getting younger and younger these days.

    They're naught-teen and twain-teen, respectively. Where is the mystery here, gentlemen?

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  19. ballsack conundrum by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Funny

    Much like the famous "ballsack conundrum" thread on fark... I'm stuck to my chair. I'm so very scared. Help. (Details In thread) "Need help soonish..."

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    1. Re:ballsack conundrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this time, the girls were stuck in their Honeypot (Road). So, a close parallel indeed.

  20. Facebook?!?! Why Facebook? by natehoy · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows you should use Twitter for that... Duh.... :)

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  21. Cry for help on Twitter by Tetsujin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone knows that if you need to call for rescue, you use twitter.

    "HELP ME! I am stuck and in real trouble and hurt real bad! I think my leg is broken, and I am losing a lot of blood. You can find me at"

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
    1. Re:Cry for help on Twitter by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      400 Character Fail :))

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    2. Re:Cry for help on Twitter by rez_rat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe she was dictating it?

    3. Re:Cry for help on Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shot me! You shot me right in the arm!

    4. Re:Cry for help on Twitter by Sir_Dill · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh SHUT UP!

    5. Re:Cry for help on Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct use of twitter: "I've fallen and I can't get up!"

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I've_fallen_and_I_can't_get_up!

  22. Yikes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the exception of possible poor signal strength for a phone call,
    I fear for the future of my species.

  23. Age requirement for Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you need to be 13 to use facebook also.

    1. Re:Age requirement for Facebook by clone53421 · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, you just have to say you are.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  24. You gotta love the IT Crowd by goodEvans · · Score: 3, Funny

    Moss: Subject: Fire. Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to inform you of a fire that has broken out on the premises of 123 Cavendon Road... no, that's too formal.
    [deletes text, starts again] Fire - exclamation mark - fire - exclamation mark - help me - exclamation mark. 123 Cavendon Road. Looking forward to hearing from you. Yours truly, Maurice Moss.
    [sigh of relief]

    1. Re:You gotta love the IT Crowd by Dr.+Hok · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wouldn't it read more like this?
      p0wn'd by f1re plz help 0x7B cavndn rd kthxbye

      --
      Say out loud: I'm an Aspie and I'm somewhat proud, I guess. Uh. Can I write an email in all caps instead? Hm...
    2. Re:You gotta love the IT Crowd by KingPin27 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Newsreader: From today, dialling 999 won't get you the emergency services. And that's not the only thing that's changing. Nicer ambulances, faster response times and better-looking drivers mean they're not just "the" emergency services - they're "your" emergency services. So, remember the new number:

      [singing number]

      Newsreader: 0118 999 881 999 119 725... 3

      --
      "i lost my dignity on a slippery wiener"
    3. Re:You gotta love the IT Crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the emergency number: 0118999881999119725-3

      I used that as my password for a long time. Got it memorized now!

  25. Better know facebook than 911 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I may be getting old having 28 years old, but I can strongly remember my parents teaching me the several emergency numbers for police, firemens, etc (these numbers were short but different some years ago in France). And it was far before I was 10 or 12.

  26. I can believe it by phorm · · Score: 1

    I've had similar instances. There are certain areas around town here where a call just doesn't work, but a text-message can get through in either direction (you get all the "missed calls" texts but no actual calls). In some cases I've had more luck with (super-slow) email than voice calls too.

    1. Re:I can believe it by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Informative

      SMS uses messages on management connections that have stronger, more redundant error correction than the voice bearers. This is why in marginal signal situations, you can text but not talk.

      --
      Evil people are out to get you.
    2. Re:I can believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've wondered for a while if it's possible to text 911. I'm not about to try. Does anyone know?

  27. In vs. Out by Crashspeeder · · Score: 1

    Generally a pipe has two directions you can travel, in and out. Ignoring the fact that walking into a pipe is a terrible idea and probably doesn't smell like rainbows and sunshine, I find that should one feel they are "lost" in a drain they should generally travel in the opposite direction they had originally chose to travel in. Clearly things get a little hairier when you start making turns at junctions but in that case, you asked for it. In either case, they should not have been deprived of the Darwin Award.

    1. Re:In vs. Out by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      As someone familiar with drains in general, and those in Australia, and Adelaide, I can tell you don't have much experience / knowledge about them.

      Firstly, drains in Australia are stormwater drains - there are no mixed services - that is, there's no sewerage.
      Drains aren't mapped out like labyrinths, either. Typically (espeically in South Australia) - are point A to point B affairs - the main conduit will be significantly larger than side pipes.

      And yes, whilst the theory of 'if they got in, they can get out' seems logical - ever remember getting stuck up a tree as a kid?

      I personally know of an accomplished 'drainer' / climber who got stuck in a junction in a South Australian drain, and who had to also call for help.

      Nice to know you were secretly gunning for their death, incidentally. I'm sure you were a very gifted child, that never did anything silly.

  28. 000, 999 and 111 make perfect sense by Viol8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the dark or in smoke it was a lot easier to keep your finger in a single digit on a rotary dial (once you'd found the right one obviously). The same probably applies to a lesser extent for touch tone phones. Its the american 911 system that I find odd , it just seems to be a number chosen at random or perhaps as a left over dial code.

    1. Re:000, 999 and 111 make perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're hard to press accidentally (ie: a toddler with a telephone wouldn't type 911, but might just type 000, or 999 without issues).

    2. Re:000, 999 and 111 make perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      911 does have one benefit, it's less likely for small children to dial than the same three digits. I'm sure this was much less of a problem in the days of rotary (and wall-mounted) phones, but with touch-tone phones it's a reality. Kids like buttons. Kids like buttons that beep. Kids are sneaky little monsters that will notice every time you leave something just barely within their reach that they can't have.

      I know at about one my monster managed to hit 999 with a dial tone before we got the phone away from her. If it was the emergency number in this country, I believe they'd be obliged to respond with a police officer (and a stern lecture) even if we told them it was a misdial.

    3. Re:000, 999 and 111 make perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Originally, we didn't use 000 or 999 because those take a very long time to dial on a rotary phone.

      As for why not 111, I think they wanted something that wasn't so easy to hit by mistake. Also, 911 mirrors the other "service" numbers in widespread use at the time such as 411 for information.

    4. Re:000, 999 and 111 make perfect sense by RobVB · · Score: 1

      At least 911 is still better than 01189998819991197253.

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
    5. Re:000, 999 and 111 make perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      911 was probably chosen so it can't (easily) be accidentally triggered by shorts/grounding on the cable back in the day when everywhere was connected via string and yogurt cups.

    6. Re:000, 999 and 111 make perfect sense by sunderland56 · · Score: 2, Informative
      American exchanges use *11 as special codes.
      • 411 is directory assistance
      • 611 is for customer service
      • 711 is the deaf-to-speech TDD service
      • 911 is the emergency number

      In many places another number (generally 311 or 711) is used as a non-emergency information service.

    7. Re:000, 999 and 111 make perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the dark or in smoke it was a lot easier to keep your finger in a single digit on a rotary dial

      We're told to get out of the house and call 911 from a neighbor's phone. Sticking around in a smoky room to dial 911 sounds like candidate behavior for a Darwin award.

    8. Re:000, 999 and 111 make perfect sense by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Its the american 911 system that I find odd , it just seems to be a number chosen at random or perhaps as a left over dial code.

      Probably directly because of old telephones with Dials on them.

      The "9" is the second slowest number on a rotary phone (and "0" already had a special significance), combined with "11" (the "quickest" number on the dial, repeated twice), probably made for a number that was relatively quick to dial, and very unlikely to be dialed accidentally.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    9. Re:000, 999 and 111 make perfect sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget 666...

    10. Re:000, 999 and 111 make perfect sense by macshit · · Score: 1

      In the dark or in smoke it was a lot easier to keep your finger in a single digit on a rotary dial (once you'd found the right one obviously). The same probably applies to a lesser extent for touch tone phones. Its the american 911 system that I find odd , it just seems to be a number chosen at random or perhaps as a left over dial code.

      "1" is much quicker to dial on a rotary dial -- a "9" seems to take forever, whereas a "1" is almost instant -- thus the use of "11" as the last two digits. However, "1" has special meaning as a first digit in the American phone system, so they couldn't use that as the first digit (and in the days of mechanical exchanges, such behavior was probably quite difficult to change).

      I don't know why they chose 9 over other non-1 numbers, but choosing the other end of the dial makes a bit of sense, as it probably is easier to remember, especially if you're under stress.

      Also, with the higher digits (e.g., 9) you really shouldn't keep your finger in the hole as the dial rotates automatically to send the pulses; doing so has an annoying tendency to screw up the pulse timing if your finger drags as it turns, resulting in misdials -- something which is not good for an emergency number! So "999" on a rotary dial is only easier to remember, not to dial, and the speed advantage of "911" probably won out over the slight memory advantage of "999".

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    11. Re:000, 999 and 111 make perfect sense by zoefff · · Score: 1

      It makes sense. It stops 2 year old and mobiles in pockets from flooding the system.

  29. Re:slightly off topic by piltdownman84 · · Score: 1

    Its well and good, but now that mobile phones have been regulated to have a mandatory "Emergency call" feature when locked. I can't even imagine how many false calls they get from this

    What is scary is that my blackberry becomes pretty much useless without a battery pull after calling an 911. I'm guessing this is to let the user know when they have accidentally called 911, but its extremely annoying when you do call in a emergency and have your phone bricked afterwards.

  30. No cell signal by whoda · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They didn't have a cell signal and were leaching someone's wireles. Sounds good, right?

    1. Re:No cell signal by fhuglegads · · Score: 1

      then they should have used skype and called someone :)

    2. Re:No cell signal by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Quite a silly story for the most part, but possibly one worth citing next time legislators are pushing to make anyone who runs unsecured access points responsible for any traffic over them. After all, 'think of the children [lost in storm drains]' seems to work quite well for the other side...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  31. You'd be surprised how useful Facebook is. by mckinnsb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just yesterday I was stranded after a wedding (it was a good wedding), without a car or cell phone. Let's just say it was a hell of a time. Anyway, long story short, I wake up one morning in a hotel room without any contact information and I have to let my family know where I am - except they all just got a new iPhone, have changed their number, and I have yet to remember it.

    Guess where one of those phone numbers was? Facebook. I found myself a public terminal in the hotel lobby and got all the information I needed to be reuinted with my car, phone, and the road.

    It is actually quite useful.

    1. Re:You'd be surprised how useful Facebook is. by fhuglegads · · Score: 1

      This had a good chance to be a story to rival Tucker Max.. but it went horribly normal and failed.

    2. Re:You'd be surprised how useful Facebook is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you the groom or the bride?

    3. Re:You'd be surprised how useful Facebook is. by adolf · · Score: 1

      He said it was a good wedding.

    4. Re:You'd be surprised how useful Facebook is. by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Next time, try tattooing your contact info on you arms and legs!

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  32. Stupidity isn't limited to the Facebook Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My stepmother was alone in the house and fell, breaking her tailbone. She managed to painfully drag herself across the room to the phone, which she used not to call 911, but to call a friend of hers from church. When she got that person's machine, she left a message asking her friend to pray for her. She then lay on the floor moaning until my brother happened to stop by the house and discover her several hours later. I never found out whether or not her friend got the message and prayed for her.

    --Posted anonymously because the stupid burns.

  33. Australia's 911 number by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Funny
    000 (Australia's 911 number)

    WTF? 000 is Australia's EMERGENCY number. Would you also say "they drive on the left side of the road (Australia's right)"? In China thay use chopsticks (Chinese knives and forks)?".

    There is a point at which explaining by Yankie analogies just makes it more confusing. Try to realise that everyone in the world does not speak English, play baseball, use Fahrenheit.... I'm sure most of the readers here actually can cope with that, and you won't bamboozle the ones who AREN'T American either.

    1. Re:Australia's 911 number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be such a tool.

    2. Re:Australia's 911 number by thewils · · Score: 1

      And anyway, 000 is really Australia's 999 number!

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    3. Re:Australia's 911 number by jeffshoaf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Try to realise that everyone in the world does not speak English, play baseball, use Fahrenheit....

      Ah, but they should!

      --
      Putting the "anal" back into "analyst"...
    4. Re:Australia's 911 number by raddan · · Score: 1

      Ah, Australia. The world's Mexico.

    5. Re:Australia's 911 number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its really sad I can't fan this through the roof with megapoints. I even live in the US and it annoys the crap out of me....

      (listening to people walk by a temperature sign displaying in Celsius and hearing them wonder why it is broken....)

    6. Re:Australia's 911 number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah... but 10 is Australia's 13.

    7. Re:Australia's 911 number by clsours · · Score: 1

      Maybe they forgot the number for 911?

      --
      Seagoon: Shut up Eccles!

      Eccles: Shut up Eccles!
    8. Re:Australia's 911 number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how would australians learn the correct number if we didn't tell them?

    9. Re:Australia's 911 number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, if I wanted to be pedantic for the sake of being pedantic like you, I would say in China they use chopsticks (China's utensils, it also replaces the spoon) and "they drive on the left side side of the road (because the wheel is on the right side of the car).

      Obviously, the yankee explanation is for people in the world who don't speak english, so that they can understand the comparative. After all, if you think there are Americans (the one's who use 911) who don't know what chopsticks are, you should be ashamed. These explanations are clearly for the english speaking Canadians and the Swiss.

    10. Re:Australia's 911 number by zoefff · · Score: 1

      yeah, next time it better be like '000 (Australia's 911 or 112 number)' so europeans can understand this as well....(and americans learn even more [ducks] ) ;-)

    11. Re:Australia's 911 number by definate · · Score: 1

      LOL. Yeah, I bet you people get the 911 reference though.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    12. Re:Australia's 911 number by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Try to realise that everyone in the world does not speak English

      Didn't we already mention the Australians?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    13. Re:Australia's 911 number by astat · · Score: 1
      If I visited this site more frequently and had some modpoints, I would try to mod this posting Insightful. For now, a mere reply will have to do.

      The posting is written in a funny way, but its message is indeed insightful to many readers, I'd assume.

    14. Re:Australia's 911 number by astat · · Score: 1

      000 (Australia's 911 number)

      WTF? 000 is Australia's EMERGENCY number. Would you also say "they drive on the left side of the road (Australia's right)"? In China thay use chopsticks (Chinese knives and forks)?".

      There is a point at which explaining by Yankie analogies just makes it more confusing. Try to realise that everyone in the world does not speak English, play baseball, use Fahrenheit.... I'm sure most of the readers here actually can cope with that, and you won't bamboozle the ones who AREN'T American either.

      If I visited this site more often and had some mod points left, I would try to mod this posting insightful. For now, a mere reply will have to do.

      While the posting is written in a funny way, it is indeed insightful to many readers, I'd assume.

  34. Submitter fail by Murpster · · Score: 1

    10 and 12, teenagers? Uhm... not on this planet.

  35. Wolfenstein by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

    What were they doing in a storm drain?

    Clearly they were playing Wolfenstein RPG and decided the sewer system was the only way to reach the castle in time.

    --
    Reply to That ||
  36. Unlike Space... by geekmux · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...apparently everyone on the Internet can hear you when you scream.

    Oh, and everyone will eventually find those naked pics too.

  37. Remember the bits by randomErr · · Score: 1

    There may have been one very good reason for using Facebook: bandwidth.

    The girls may not have been able to get a enough bandwidth to make a voice call, but easily enough for an SMS or other message type. Voice has to be real-time and uses several kilobytes of data transfer per second. Data can take all day to send a 1k message to Facebook, Twitter, ect...

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Remember the bits by Tarsir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Data can take all day to send a 1k message to Facebook, Twitter, ect...

      But if you're stuck in a stormdrain at the time, hopefully it won't!

      What's with all the Darwin Award comments? I'm not normally one to complain about black humour, but Really? Walking into a stormwater drain is hardly mortal peril, and if it were, don't you think 12 year-olds are young enough to legitimately not know better?

    2. Re:Remember the bits by CompMD · · Score: 1

      Just being picky, but the amount of bandwidth you need for voice communication on a cell phone is only about 8.5kbps.

  38. Emergency Numbers by Cancer_Cures · · Score: 1

    Last year I was in Rio de Janeiro, and an older gent had a heart attack (maybe stroke, or seizure) in front of my friend and I on the street. We were the only ones nearby, so the right thing for me to do was rush to the nearest pay phone (about halfway up the block) and try to dial 9-1-1. Afer the second try, it dawned on me. Different country, different emergency code.

  39. Re:slightly off topic by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 2, Interesting

    one of the nice things about 911 is the 9 and the 1s are on different sides of the keypad, so if you call 911, you really mean to call it

    Where there's a will, there's a way! :-)

    In my office, we've had the police come by several times to the point where building management had to send an e-mail blast saying that we were going to get fined for accidentally dialing 9-1-1 and then hanging up. To dial out of our phone system, we have to hit 9. A lot of us have to get on conference calls which requires a 1-888 or 1-866 number. Well, some of my office mates would hit 9 to connect out, but for whatever reason they don't hear the dial tone, so they hit 9 again. (even though it registered the first time...)

    Then for whatever reason, they would hit 1 twice (probably for the same reason why they hit 9 twice), connecting them to emergency dispatcher. They would immediately hang up, but by then it's too late. The dispatcher will automatically assume an emergency if you hang up, and a patrol car is sent to our office. We were told that if we accidentally do this again, to just stay on the line and to tell the dispatcher that it was an accident so that they don't automatically send police over.

    I don't think we've had the problem since the warning, but I think it's interesting that despite the keys being all the way across the keypad, people still manage to dial 9-1-1.

  40. Informational content bellow: by denzacar · · Score: 1
    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Informational content bellow: by Ifni · · Score: 1

      I was disappointed to find that this video had noting to do with informational content bellows, or even regular old air bellows.

      --

      Oh, was that my outside voice?

    2. Re:Informational content bellow: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was actually this definition of "bellow" that applies (from dictionary.com):

      â"verb (used with object)
      3. to utter in a loud deep voice: He bellowed his command across the room.

      Though I think the loud deep voice is lost in the textual nature of the post.

  41. 911 Useless from cell by wsanders · · Score: 1

    This has been promoted somewhat - First, in Northern California, if you call 911 from a cell phone you will get forwarded to a central highway patrol dispatch center and immediately placed on hold from 5 to 10 minutes. I've called 911 twice from my cell and both times I was home before I got off hold. This will probably get fixed when the GPS locating mess gets fixed. Meanwhile, you program in as many non-911 local agency numbers as you can.

    Second, as parent pointed out you may be able to text when voice won't get through.My county emergency services can *send* text messages in the event of a large scale alert but I don't know if they can receive them.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:911 Useless from cell by RingDev · · Score: 1

      No idea what your local issue is, but in Wisconsin I have never had an issue with using 911 from my cell. Even calling in debris in the road on interstate I'll get piped to the local county's 911 operator who forwarded me to the highway patrol, but I had the info passed on before I was more than a few miles down the road.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    2. Re:911 Useless from cell by honkycat · · Score: 1

      The 911 systems in California are hopelessly overwhelmed, and it's especially bad for cell phones since they have the extra layers of routing. When I took First Aid training, the first thing they told us was to call 911 with a land line if at all possible.

  42. Re:slightly off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    911 has its massive downsides tho. if you need an outside line at college, you hit 9, if your dieling long distance you hit 1
    so if your on campus calling home and hit 91 and then muck up and double tap the 1 your in a potential heap of trouble for misdiling 911.

  43. Re:slightly off topic by tetranz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Going back to rotary phones which went clockwise 0987654321 (except in NZ) 111 would be really fast to dial but it can happen accidentally too easily with a loose wire or something because it's just three pulses. I'm guessing but that sort of accidental dialing is why the British choose 999. It's very unlikely that a loose wire would generate 9 pulses at the right pulse rate even once let along three times. But ... it's slower so maybe the US took a compromise and went for 911. I suspect in practice that the time you gain with less dial movement would be lost moving your finger.

    The Kiwi dials went clockwise 0123456789 so I guess we followed the Brits and choose 111 which is the same pulses as 999 elsewhere.

    Australian 000 is an odd choice. I vaguely remember some problems long ago with toll blocking on phones also unintentionally blocking 000. That probably only happened with equipment not approved for Australia.

  44. Insightful? by heritage727 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, you have to be 13 to have a Facebook account. They have Facebook accounts. So they must be 13, and hence teenagers, even if they're only 10 and 12. Seems perfectly clear to me.

    I like to be modded up as much as the next person, but Insightful? Jeez, I was trying for Funny.

    1. Re:Insightful? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      You want weird? Check out the mod on my comment.

      Mods don't even seem to click on the links these days.

    2. Re:Insightful? by fuyu-no-neko · · Score: 1

      Well, you have to be 13 to have a Facebook account. They have Facebook accounts. So they must be 13, and hence teenagers, even if they're only 10 and 12. Seems perfectly clear to me.

      I like to be modded up as much as the next person, but Insightful? Jeez, I was trying for Funny.

      That's ok, you were then modded Funny for being insightful into your mods. Personally, I'm still waiting for a +5 Cynical.

      --
      Don't take the above poster too seriously. He doesn't.
    3. Re:Insightful? by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. The +1 In* mods are often given to funny posts because the funny mod doesn't give the poster karma. Besides, funny is reserved for the same old memes repeated ad nauseum.

    4. Re:Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to be modded up as much as the next person, but Insightful? Jeez, I was trying for Funny.

      And now your insightful post has been modded funny. Welcome to Slashdot.

  45. Completely off topic by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

    OK, so a carrier pidgin & facebook have a logo for their stories, but Ubuntu has to use Debian's?

    Seriously, what do we need to do to get one added? And are any of the other distro's logos MIA as well?

    --
    I call it 'The Aristocrats'
  46. Yankee by Fourpole · · Score: 1

    If you're going to insult us you could at least spell "Yankee" right.

    1. Re:Yankee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He even points out that not everyone speaks English as a first language. And what do you do? Criticize him for improper English spelling.

      You obviously understood what he was trying to say, so why so defensive?

    2. Re:Yankee by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      He didn't insult us at all. He instead gave us credit for likely being able to figure out that 'emergency number' means 911. You make a good argument against him though.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    3. Re:Yankee by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Yes but how many Americans would have figured out "they called 999/000"? It doesn't stop the fact that it is a very regional specific code. It would be similar to saying "the phone wasn't broken he just forgot to dial 410 before the rest of the number" because everyone knows that is Baltimore. Anyways 999/911/000 are all better examples than in my neck of the woods. At least in my area of Germany they have different 3 number codes depending on if you want fire, police or medical. You don't want to call the wrong one because Germans are almost as litigious as Americans.

  47. Re:slightly off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If all you have to do is yank the battery out and power cycle it, it's not bricked. Bricked mens it would be rendered completely and utterly useless; a paperweight; a doorstop; a brick.

    The only way to recover a brick is possibly disassembling and desoldering the flash chips, using an eeprom programmer to reprogram the chips, and soldering them back in,

  48. Re:I AM STUCK BEHIND A KEYBOARD AND GLOWING RECTAN by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1
  49. The history of 911 by westlake · · Score: 2, Informative

    Its the american 911 system that I find odd , it just seems to be a number chosen at random or perhaps as a left over dial code.

    In the states, dialing the operator, dialing "0," in an emergency was drilled into kids for the better part of one hundred years.

    "911" was easily recognized by AT&T's switching logic as needing special handling. The History of 911

    The "9" may have been suggested by the British "999" system adopted in 1937.

  50. 911 (000) should have text support by swillden · · Score: 1

    I've been in lots of areas where my cell service wasn't good enough to support a voice call, but texting worked (albeit slowly -- sometimes it takes minutes to get the message out). I don't know that that was the case in this storm drain, but it could have been. Perhaps these girls were clever, rather than stupid. Given that the emergency services is not reachable via text messaging, they could have tried texting all their friends/parents/etc. to get someone else to get them help, but sending the message to facebook or twitter would reach a whole bunch of those people at once.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  51. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My immediate reaction was facepalm. Really. I'm totally serious. When I read that I facepalmed, literally.

  52. Mass media run with it. One more time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tween's get lost.

    Tweat/Facebook about it. TO THERE FRIENDS

    Stupid Friend Tween freaks and calls ((000)911)) instead of calling other stupid tween to make sure they are ok.

    Mass media run with it.

    Come on guys. Can you go back to when you were a kid. Really. THE SKY IS FALLING THE SKY IS FALLING.

  53. Cool! An Anne Hathaway/Ali Larter love scene! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > "Two teenage girls (aged 10 and 12) found themselves trapped/lost in a stormwater drain in
    > Adelaide, South Australia. The interesting point of this article that makes it Slashdot worthy"

    as opposed to 4chan-worthy.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  54. That's nothing. Just like this post. by MrCrassic · · Score: 2, Informative

    ---

    1. Re:That's nothing. Just like this post. by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      Only on Slashdot can this be modded informative.

  55. When the hell do you PAY for an ambulance ? by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unless it's a prank call (and even then, you normally just get a ticking-off by an irate policeman from what I've read), when would any emergency-service make you PAY for its use ? Isn't the whole point of an emergency service to be there when you need it ? What the hell do you do if you can't afford an emergency service ?

    I'm guessing the whole 'paying' idea is a USA thing, although my apologies to the US for assuming that, if there's anywhere else that's so screwed up that they make you pay for essential services.

    I've recently had very bad news in my family - in the space of two weeks, my uncle has been told he needs heart surgery, and my mother has been diagnosed with breast cancer. My uncle has been scheduled for surgery on 15th of this month, and my mother has put off her appointment (originally on the 11th) because I'm getting married on the 12th. She'll be going under the knife on 19th instead. My uncle will be missing the wedding, but we're going to stream it live so he can watch it in the UK, even if it is at midnight over there :)

    I thank my lucky stars we're from the UK, because there's just no way our family could afford their treatment over here in the USA - my uncle's heart surgery would cost circa $175,000, my mother's cancer treatment and subsequent costs could come to circa $100,000. We've never had money - I was the first kid in our family to go to college for example, and I had to pay my way through that. We've always scraped-by and made-do, mother and father working, grandmother looking after the kids etc. Over here, I'm lucky in that I have an excellent medical insurance plan from my company, but my fiancee didn't have medical insurance until we met. She used to try not to visit a doctor, to self-medicate via a drugstore if something was wrong. I was horrified that someone would even consider that. Seriously and truthfully - I was aghast that a visit to the doctors wasn't just "what you'd do if you're not feeling well". It's just a no-brainer from my (and anyone from the UK, I suspect) perspective.

    For her part, my mother gets personal visits in her home from the MacMillan nurse (cancer specialist nurses, there to answer any questions, give advice, as well as do the nursing stuff), and she has one of the best surgical teams in the country ready to operate when she gets back to the UK. All of this is standard-stuff, she pays her dues (in her taxes / national insurance contributions), and she has the peace-of-mind that comes from knowing she has access to excellent health-care whenever she wants it, without being suddenly landed with huge bills, and without any worry of 'recission' by a financially-orientated insurance company.

    There's a lot I like (even prefer) about the USA, but the healthcare system is (from an outsiders perspective) a badge of shame. Everyone gets sick eventually, and everyone dies eventually. Any civilised country ought to recognise and cope with that such that people don't fall through the cracks. The NHS in the UK isn't perfect - you'll frequently hear Brits complaining about it - but it's head, shoulders, and torso above the system over here. I still pay my 'national insurance' in the UK, even though I live in the US - the cost is minimal (about £15/month), and I don't mind helping fund something today that I (or, say, a member of my family) might make use of tomorrow. To me, it's beyond belief that people in the USA fight *against* a similar system, but hey, each to their own. I don't get to vote over here so it's not as though I can do anything about it...

    Bottom line: In the UK, health follows an almost burger-king like mantra - "you need it? You got it!" whereas in the USA, you're trusting your health and possibly your life to the same sort of company that screws you

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:When the hell do you PAY for an ambulance ? by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      Everyone gets sick eventually, and everyone dies eventually.

      And Americans try to be first at everything!

    2. Re:When the hell do you PAY for an ambulance ? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 0, Troll

      paying for emergency services

      Guess what? Someone still pays for your emergency services and health care.

      That someone may even in part be you, even in the UK.

      Or do you seriously think that everyone involved works for free and the equipment is all donated by the makers?

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    3. Re:When the hell do you PAY for an ambulance ? by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's a cut-and-dried as you seem to believe.

      I was in a motorcycle accident last year (here in the U.S) and spent three weeks in the hospital, six surgeries, and associated care from one of the best orthopedic surgeons (head of Ortho at Stanford Medical). The cost was several hundred thousand dollars, of which I personally paid less than 500. For INSURED people (people with personal or employer-subsidized coverage), the system works fairly well. Not perfectly, but then again what does? For the UNINSURED (not uninsured by choice), the system sucks--their care is the ER or a clinic. It's too bad that the zealots on both sides of the issue can't get together and solve the problem without completely abolishing the system. (A high proportion of U.Sians surveyed are happy with their health care)

      It's quite possible that our experience with other government agencies taints our ability to see "government-run" health care as a good thing. After having dealt with the various agencies here, you aren't too keen on medical care that has cost overruns like the military, the speed and convenience of the DMV, and the kindly bedside manner of the IRS. Maybe in other countries your local/regional/national government is all sweetness and light?

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    4. Re:When the hell do you PAY for an ambulance ? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Are you including the amount you will be paying in the future in increased insurance premiums in that 500?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:When the hell do you PAY for an ambulance ? by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1
      Oh for [insert deity]'s sake, it's obvious that payment is made somehow - I thought that could be taken as read... If all you got from that was that I thought the emergency services somehow magically work unpaid, your reading comprehension isn't that good.

      I direct you to the part in the post ...

      All of this is standard-stuff, she pays her dues (in her taxes / national insurance contributions), and she has the peace-of-mind that comes from knowing she has access to excellent health-care whenever she wants it, without being suddenly landed with huge bills, and without any worry of 'recission' by a financially-orientated insurance company.

      ... where it ought to be obvious that the payment is being made from national insurance/taxes contributions.

      The difference between you and I is that I think the low cost ($20/month if you're working) is well worth the peace of mind it brings. I'm also happy to pay that much per month to fund other people's well being - and from what I see on TV/read in newspapers, that's not a concept that sits well with a lot of people in the USA.

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    6. Re:When the hell do you PAY for an ambulance ? by shermo · · Score: 2, Informative

      It makes sense from an entirely selfish point of view also.

      Some amazingly large percentage of all bankruptcies in the US are caused by inability to pay for medical bills. That cost gets passed on to the population. It seems reasonable that this happens in a less efficient method than if medical costs were paid for up front by the population.

      Also, I don't want to get mugged by some guy who lost his house to pay for his sister's life saving kidney replacement.

      A functioning society that look after its members is better for all members of the society.

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    7. Re:When the hell do you PAY for an ambulance ? by BeardsmoreA · · Score: 1

      Hey from the UK. I agree with the vast bulk of your statement, but I think in most cases the GBP 15 a month would be mega misleading. Maybe that's true in your ex-pat case, but for most employed people I think NI contributions are significantly higher than that, I'm certain mine are. Still of course worth it to not have to consider paying for an ambulance call out - always wondered how that worked under private system, sounds like it doesn't.

    8. Re:When the hell do you PAY for an ambulance ? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      > Unless it's a prank call (and even then, you normally just
      > get a ticking-off by an irate policeman from what I've read),
      > when would any emergency-service make you PAY for its use ?
      > Isn't the whole point of an emergency service to be there
      > when you need it ? What the hell do you do if you can't afford
      > an emergency service ?
      >
      > I'm guessing the whole 'paying' idea is a USA thing, although
      > my apologies to the US for assuming that, if there's anywhere
      > else that's so screwed up that they make you pay for essential
      > services.

      I can't say that this applies to all areas of the US, but it does match what I've observed. If you have insurance it isn't so bad. If you don't have insurance, it's really rough.

      My step son had a seizure while we were in the car. It was the first seizure that we had observed. Everything with the emergency services went wrong at first.

      I pulled him from the car. The back seats of my car are small, and didn't give me room to check him in. I put him in front of the car for visibility and safety. It was dark, so I needed the headlights to see him with. The car helped protect us in case of a careless driver. I made sure he was stable.

      His mother held him with his head off the ground, and was watching his breathing (make sure he's still breathing. Scream for me if he isn't). I called 911 from my cell phone. We have mandatory E911 service here, which is suppose to give the dispatcher my information (coordinates, name, callback number). The call was difficult because of the noise of the traffic who weren't stopping. She kept asking where we were. I told her the highway, which side of the road, what the nearest exits were. I couldn't be precise to distance, but it was only a few miles between exits so they had a good chance of finding us. They kept asking "Where?" "What road?" Since I repeated it a dozen times, all I could hope was that they had looked at the coordinates and dispatched immediately.

      We waited about 15 minutes. No one showed up to help. I wasn't watching traffic, I was keeping an eye on him. I have to assume at least one patrol car passed by, since they patrol the road frequently. No one stopped.

      I loaded him back in the car, and seatbelted him him with his hands under the belts. He wasn't convulsing any more, and was breathing on his own, but he was unresponsive even though his eyes were open.

      I took the next two options simultaneously. Get him to a hospital or find a cop. I'm very good at driving very fast, so with the hazard lights on, I drove as fast as I could safely drive towards the nearest hospital. I did pass a "Your speed is..." sign, which just flashed 99 at me. I had well exceeded it's max displayable speed. A few miles down the road, there was heavy traffic due to construction. I lucked out, and there was a cop who had pulled over someone for DUI on the right side, so I drove up to the shoulder to him, and he handled the calls from there. He got the paramedics on the radio. No one had been dispatched. They talked him through the same things I had done. "Is he breathing? Is he bleeding? Are there any apparent injuries? Does he seem stable?"

      After we found the cop, everything went right from there, but the financial concerns showed up.

      We were billed for the ambulance ride, the hospital emergency room time, cat scan, blood work, etc. We weren't billed for the police time. From what I understand, if it's a search and rescue, you pay for all of it. If they send out boats, helicopters, and searchers, that's all billed to the person or family.

      Sometimes they absorb the cost. Well, my tax dollars are paying anyways, but... When he passed away several months later, we called 911, gave the street address, and a quick diagnosis while I was doing CPR. They arrived in less than 5 minutes.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  56. Re:slightly off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has to do with the NANP and how phone numbers are formed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NANP

    911 (and 411) were reserved...

  57. Re:slightly off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Australian Telstra rotary dial payphone use to have the numbers in the order: 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-0.

    So the "0" was in the same place as the "9" on for example the British phones.

    As can be seen by the image - the "0" was also the easiest position to find on the dial by feel only - as it was next to the stop-guard.

    http://www.worldpayphones.com/units/green2.jpg

  58. Oh, no! by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    My thirteen-year-old has been after us to allow her to have a Facebook account. Now, I can already hear the next pitch: "But Dad, it could save my life!"

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:Oh, no! by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      You don't have to wait for anything. She'll just make one and not tell you. Problem solved.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    2. Re:Oh, no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not beating her enough...

  59. Re:slightly off topic by DrVxD · · Score: 1

    The UK's use of 999 dates back to 1937 - well before telephones had keypads, let alone fitted in pockets. The number was selected in order that the mechanical dials on existing public telephones could easily be modified to allow the number to be called for free.

    more info here

    Australia's use of 000 dates back to 1961 - again, before keypads and mobiles.

    --
    Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  60. Re:slightly off topic by DrVxD · · Score: 1

    ...and, of course, the point I totally failed to make.
    With a mechanical dial (I remember them), it's next to impossible to dial 999 (or 000) accidentally - but it's pretty easy to dial either of them intentionally - even if you can't see the dial for whatever reason.

    --
    Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  61. Ah! Now that's a use for cloud/crowd computing by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    Next up, outsource your cry for help to Google or Amazon Turk. Why call 911 yourself when you can have the Internet do it for you?

  62. Maybe it wasn't stupidity by jeko · · Score: 1

    Maybe they knew they had a better chance at getting a timely response from posting on Facebook than they would calling 911...

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:Maybe it wasn't stupidity by Falconhell · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Given this was in Australia where 911 is not the emergency number, you are right.

  63. Because teenagers only exist in English countries by kahizonaki · · Score: 1

    Only (?) in English do the words that refer to that adolescent age group and the endings of the number words for 13 through 19 match up.

  64. Re:Because teenagers only exist in English countri by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    Good point. I'm glad you made it, in English, on an article written in English, to an English-speaking audience, about something that happened in an English-speaking country. Thanks.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  65. Re:Because teenagers only exist in English countri by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    (I was going for funny, so hopefully that didn't sound too harsh. I'm not saying your point is incorrect or uninteresting – just fairly irrelevant.)

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  66. Not necessarily stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I don't really know why they decided to use Facebook in particular I can say I have been in situations where I was not able to place an audible phone call but was able to send and receive text messages because the system uses more redundancy and attempts to correct errors.

    If they found themselves in a similar situation, unable to place a phone call to 000 they may still be able to use the SMS system to text for help. If their texts to their parents failed texting an update to Facebook is a rather intelligent workaround. Many 911 centers are starting to accept SMS texts for help for this exact reason.

  67. 000 number has problems in Australia by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 1

    If I was stuck in a storm drain, I probably wouldn't call 000 either.
    Unless you can give them a street address, they will just laugh at you and hang up.

  68. Re:Because teenagers only exist in English countri by kahizonaki · · Score: 1

    No, that's entirely sound. But trying to pick out (natural?) kinds based on words is a pretty silly idea from the start. It becomes even more painfully obvious when people realize that there is more than one language and `yours' and `theirs' don't always match up. And then trying to pick out (natural?) kinds based on conceptualisation in the first place fails as well, since there are multiple cultures, which may again have different views on the matter.
    BUT, I would argue that picking out a range of ages based on two iterations of counting through all 10 of your fingers is a more natural and universal concept based on sounder and more natural terms than is the age range defined by the affix to numbers between 13 and 19 in English :P I guess the question is whether 13-19 has some other, more sound basis. For instance, some important biological function being mostly present in 13-year olds, but less so in 12, 11, 10-year olds. Not that language is based on useful functions though. I agree that, in many cases, it is not.
    I guess all of this is (though interesting) totally tangential. In this case calling the 10 and 12 year old `teens' is more appropriate than calling them `pre-teens' because then all the more inapplicable associations with `pre-teen' (still unable to operate computers, etc. because they are 5yrs old) may have been misapplied. Had the child been 15, or 17, or 19 years old the story would not have changed much. But had they been 5, and been able to work out the cell phone usage and facebook etc., that would have been amazing in its own right. So, in the context of this story, they fit more into the `teen' category, than the `pre-teen' category. Though, I guess here `children' may have been sufficient.
    Whatever :P

  69. Re:slightly off topic by DemingBuiltMyHotRod · · Score: 1

    In the US, dialing 211 has the same impact as dialing 911 to make easier for visitors from other countries.

  70. Re:Because teenagers only exist in English countri by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    No, that's entirely sound. BUT, I would argue that I guess all of this is (though interesting) totally tangential. In this case `children' may have been sufficient.
    Whatever :P

    (Yes, I just mis-quoted you horribly. I think I kept to the intent of your comment pretty well, though...)

    More or less agreed. FWIW, in TFA the two girls were just "10- and 12-year-old girls". The person who wrote the summary chose to call them teenagers for some reason. (The submitter appears to be an Aussie... a few of the other Aussie commenters on here have also said they thought "teens" referred to 10-19, so perhaps it's an Aussie thing. Although, it might be regional too, because not all of the Aussie posters seem to be in agreement on the fact.)

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  71. Probably shopping for the best deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fee for being rescued around here in the US starts at $500 plus rescuer's time fees plus the ticket you're going to get for being a dolt on city property. By the end of it that call for rescue might cost you $5 or 10k.

    Screw that, somebody throw me a rope and I'll give you a twenty and a good story.

  72. Off topic but interesting by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

    In Australia, a call to 000 from a mobile phone will result in call charges. If the caller instead dials 112 (the international emergency number), the bill is picked up by the carrier. Also 112 can be used in areas where there is no mobile service.

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    1. Re:Off topic but interesting by psm321 · · Score: 1

      Umm, how can you make a call when there's no service? Perhaps you meant no service from your own carrier? I don't know about the rules in Australia but in the US 911 calls have to be taken by any network whether you're a subscriber or not.

  73. Re:slightly off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    used to be 000 here not changed to 112 like rest of europe. when it was 000 lots of people accidentially called becuase getting an outside line is normally 0 and USA for example 001 -... so when people called from home they would forget to not hit 0 to get outside line

  74. Australia's 911 number by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    I thought it was Australia's emergency services number.

  75. Re:slightly off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it will seem strange to you, but the 000 was first used before mobiles were invented. It has not been the problem you suggest.

    As for driving on the wrong side of the road, we are happy to be on the side we are, as right handers when on horse back, one mounts from the left, (Throwing the right leg over the horse)which became the kerbside, so one mounted the horse away from traffic. Its important to be able to moount a horse safely you know. Samoa has actually this week seen the light and changed from
    driving on the right to driving on the left.

    As usual, the US will be several hunderd years behind the civilised world in this matter.(See metrication)

    Intersetingly, the US copied the french in driving on the wrong side of the road. Driving on the right was introduced to France and its territories at the time by Napolean, just to spite the British.

    See that key next to Z-it makes capitals which are an important part of the english language, as illustrated below.

    I helped my unlce Jack off his horse.

    I helped my unlce jack off his horse.

  76. Me too by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Funnily enough, I was in a motorbike accident myself before I came over to the USA. Nowhere near as bad as your own (I was very lucky) but I was in hospital for a couple of days, rode there in the ambulance, had police and fire trucks called out to the scene etc. There was no charge, and it didn't cross my mind that there would be...

    Any (every ?) government gets a lot of flak for pretty much anything it does - you can't please all the people all the time and all that, but at the end of the day, they're not trying to make a profit. Any private institution has to run all the same risks, spend all the same money, and also make a return on the investment. Normally I'm fully behind this as a great motivator for the company concerned, but when the easy option is to simply screw the "customer" in order to turn a profit, I'm not so sure.

    In any event, the point of my post wasn't about people like you and I, with good medical insurance coverage. It was because I don't believe *anyone* should be concerned about medical coverage, even if that costs me something. That, I think, is a big cultural divide between the US and the UK on this matter, not just the public/private debate.

    My fiancee is in fact more-qualified than I, she has a JD/MBA. However, she is still paying off student debts (another thing I didn't have to worry about in the UK, but that's another rant altogether :) and has only got a position as a long-term contractor; she would have had to pay her own medical insurance without any company aid, which (even with her income) is simply ridiculously expensive. If a well-educated well-to-do person can't afford medical insurance, something is rotten in the state of Denmark...

    As far as the argument that you don't trust the government because of its past performance, it seems you do trust an insurance company, despite all evidence to the contrary of how they behave when you need them to pay up. Anyone who's been involved in a car accident would probably attest that (a) they screw you if they can, and (b) they screw you later by increasing your premiums, even if they somehow didn't manage to screw you via (a).

    On top of that, Medical insurance agencies have come up with (c), a new evil: "recission". This is where they go back through your file looking for any possible (no matter how tenuous) excuse to retroactively cancel your insurance (even after payment has been initially made), leaving you with the huge bill that you might even have thought was already paid, and no possibility of getting any medical insurance in the future. I read of a case where a fall by the pregnant mother cancelled a policy by the adult daughter when the daughter developed vision problems at age 27.

    I'm sorry, but that just sucks. Really. Really. Really sucks.

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Me too by demonlapin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well...

      Recission should simply be made criminal except when actual fraud was perpetrated upon the insurance company. But it's rare, and so it's not really the problem.

      Perhaps I can give you a bit more insight into how the system works from a slightly more insider perspective: insurance in the US is a complete dog's breakfast because there are 50 different state regulatory agencies telling companies what to do. My state places very few requirements on what the companies must cover, and premiums are fairly low - I can join the "high-risk pool" run by the state, with immediate coverage and no preexisting conditions disallowed, for $450/mo (which has a $1000 medical deductible and $250 pharmacy deductible; rates go down to $170/mo for $10000/$1000). This isn't cheap, but it's affordable for anyone who doesn't qualify for Medicaid, which is the state-provided coverage for the poor. There are all sorts of things that state insurance boards can do to run up the cost, though, like requiring that birth control pills be covered, or having "community rating" in which everyone in an area generally pays the same amount regardless of preexisting conditions, or "shall issue" in which they can't turn you down. (The combination of the last two works to make costs much, much higher.)

      So when we say we don't trust our government, there's more than one government at work. State governments generally regard Federal money as a delightful windfall to be used and abused as long as it's there, so they don't work to keep costs down. Insurance companies may try to screw you, but at least you can go to another one. If you have group health insurance via your employer, you can even get your preexistings covered if your employer switches plans.

      Medicaid alone goes a long way to explaining American indifference to the uninsured. The presence of programs that exist solely to provide for the poor gives the very clear impression (whether or not it is correct) that someone who doesn't have insurance isn't poor, but has chosen not to buy insurance. And that makes people a lot less sympathetic - why worry about the 25-year-old guy who'd rather have a fancy car than health insurance? Furthermore, it presents a rather immediate solution to the problem of the uninsured - provide it for everyone in the state who wants it, and set up a sliding scale of payments required based on income. Medicaid is a sufficiently unpleasant coverage to have that people will happily pay to have something better.

      And this gets right to the heart of it. Medicaid and Medicare were sold to our parents and grandparents as a way to provide coverage for everyone. Given that they've screwed that up, why is chucking the whole system (which, on balance, works pretty well for the vast majority of people) and starting all over the best way to do it? The issue has been complicated by the fact that quite a few people in the liberal wing of the Democratic Party have all but openly acknowledged that any "public option" would be a first step toward a fully socialized health care system (which nearly always ends up sounding just like Canada's system, as if we can't do better than that). It doesn't take too many tales of patients waiting a few months for a hip replacement, or not being able to get a doctor's appointment when away from home, or not being able to see the doctor they want, for the relatively well-to-do elderly to kill something off (and there is no voting bloc like the over-65s - they are politically savvy, they are wealthier than any other group, and they always have free time to go vote).

      Oh, and to answer something you mentioned earlier - EMS that has a contract for an area can't refuse to pick you up, but they can send you a bill afterward, and it's extremely common for the Coast Guard and other rescue agencies to send bills to people who do dumb stuff.

  77. Believe it or not... by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    ...I kinda do this too? Just a bit different.

    When I'm going into a remote and/or potentially dangerous area, such as in my canoe, hunting or hiking in state forests or other places, I'll make a post to my blog entitled "Where To Find The Body".

    I post details about where I'm going, what I'm wearing, what I'm carrying, driving, doing, when I'm going in, when I can be expected out, when I should be declared LATE and who to call. I include a link to a GoogleMap and the local police/fire/rescue number.

    With 200+ pairs of eyes watching, I've got a decent number of people who'll be checking back to make sure I've made an update saying I'm out safe.

    --
    [End Of Line]
    1. Re:Believe it or not... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Huh. I like the title. I'll have to steal that.

  78. Re:Facebook scams also use "cry for help" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod abuse

  79. I.T. Crowd by atomic-penguin · · Score: 1
    --
    /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
  80. Missing the point by mykro76 · · Score: 1

    I am from Adelaide. What that particular article doesn't mention is that (a) this occurred at 7:30pm. Sunset was 18:00 that day and astronomical twilight (complete darkness) at 19:24. And (b) it occurred in Hackham. Think of your city, find the quarter that has the lowest socio-economic status and the highest crime rates, and imagine this occurring somewhere in that quarter.

    Rather than whether they used facebook or rang 000, the crux of the local debate is what 10- and 12-year old girls were doing wandering drains at night in this area.

  81. Re:Because teenagers only exist in English countri by Tomfrh · · Score: 1

    a few of the other Aussie commenters on here have also said they thought "teens" referred to 10-19, so perhaps it's an Aussie thing.

    No it's not an Aussie thing. Everyone in Australia knows "teen" means 13-19.

  82. Idiocracy lacks logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I've learned anything from Idiocracy.

    You haven't. At least I hope you haven't. It is, well, idiotic.

    Evolution works pretty much like this: People who are most adept to survive and breed in the current world do survive and breed. Idiocracy makes a statement "These days it isn't the smartest people, so our society is turning stupid and heading towards destruction." and that is where it goes seriously wrong. It feeds on the superiority that everyone who assumes "I'm smarter than most of the people." feels in addition to the "Things were better in the old days" -feeling. Easy prey.

    First of all... Things were never better in the old days. Honestly, population never getting smarter on average but even ignoring that... We want technology to advance, that's all. For that, we need intelligent people with access to decent education (to get started. Even crappy universities are enough for that. I'm sure that the kind of people can find a library for more information about the subjects they are interested in). However, it's an absolute amount. What we care about is that 200 new Newtons are better than 100 new Newtons, not whether 0.001 or 0.002 percent of our population is the genius material.

    With a lot larger population than it used to be and a lot easier access to education than ever before, we have just that. The highly educated breed mostly with each other so we are in a positive loop. Yeah, those with lower education breed even more but really, we don't need to think about that. We don't care what percentage of the society consists of the "more intelligent sect" (ugh, I hate to say those words), only that it is growing in the amount of people. Only reason to care about the percentages would be to say "Well, people will be more intelligent voters" but we have never been anywhere near of that happening.

    And know what? It is happening and working. Science is progressing. Visit a website called Slashdot some day. Just today there was an article that Japanese company is renting affordable exoskeletons for civilians!

    In addition, high average IQ isn't the goal of our society. It's just one way to get there. What we want is to be happy. To have fun. Why do the "ignorant masses of idiots" breed with each other so much? Because they want to. They think they'll enjoy their lives more the way they live them. So it's awesome that they are doing that. Even if the progress of science were to slow down, our society could still improve by people becoming more happy.

    And if everything else happens through worst case scenarios (IE: Progress of science slows down and we really, really need that to become more happy), "free market" will take over as long as there won't be any breeding restrictions or the like. Very intelligent people are needed a lot but they are less common so they are respected more, get more money, get laid more... The reason why university education isn't as valued now as it used to be is not just because the level of education isn't what it used to be (a claim I would also be willing to challenge) but because it is so much more common. Of course it is valued less now.

    1. Re:Idiocracy lacks logic by psm321 · · Score: 1

      The problem lies exactly in the "intelligent voters" part that you dismiss so rapidly. With a large mass of truly dumb people (I don't mean current society, but a potential of where we're heading), you end up with things like voters forcing Brawndo to be used for watering plants.

  83. wow by Matie · · Score: 1

    wow. i cant believe how stupid some of the people are these days. i mean come on. what if someone wasn't on facebook? it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out the best choice is to call 911. the internet isn't always working right. so why depend on it to get your message to someone in an emergency? had their friend not been on facebook at the time they would have probably just stayed down there.

  84. Face Book Really?!?!?! by gowdy11 · · Score: 1

    This shows how much our society has progressed in these news years of wonderful technology. Why wouldn't you just phone-a-friend. FB could be seen as a reliable source to people in problems. It just goes to show how far our society has come due to the problems and concerns of how we are more concerned with face book than the worldly downfall because of nukes and our economical situation that the world is depending on.

  85. Famous Australian song... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Storm drain Matilda, storm drain Matilda,
    Storm drain Matilda is facebookin' me,
    She's trapped, yeah she's stuck,
    But callin' the blue heelers failed,
    Storm drain Matilda is facebookin' me.

  86. Girls in a well by Britbrit · · Score: 1

    When I first read this I couldn't help think how ridiculous it was that these two girls got on Facebook to call for help instead of calling their version of 911 ; but after thinking about it and reading some comments it kind of makes sense because it was possible that they might not have had signal to call or text anyone. So the next best thing would have been to E-mail or get on the web.

  87. mod parent up! by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

    Sad but true... most insightful thing I've heard all day.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
  88. Do you want to be a fan of "911 Emergency Respo... by tomzyk · · Score: 2, Funny

    A notification has been sent to "911 Emergency Response". The user must accept your friend request before they will appear in your friends list.

    [meanwhile, the victim dies because "911 Emergency Response" is actually "sleeping in today and not going to class cuz last night was so crazy omfg".]

    --
    Karma: NaN
  89. wow. that is a good point by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    Plus there are situations where being able to text "help, I'm being held hostage" is a more viable option than making a voice call to say "help, I'm being held hostage"

    Since we have made these types of technological advancements over the past several years, does anyone know if 911 is keeping up with the times and accepts text messages or if there is any plan for it? (Not just for "hostage situations" but also for people who are physically unable to talk/listen on a phone.) Can 911 trace your cellphone to a general location using either GPS or just cell-tower triangulation? etc...

    --
    Karma: NaN
  90. Re:slightly off topic by Zerth · · Score: 1

    Yargh, we got that so much we changed the access code.

  91. Re:Because teenagers only exist in English countri by Harald+Paulsen · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's the same in norwegian: tretten (13) to nitten (19)

    Ofcourse we use a different word, namely tenåring.

    In swedish the word is tonåring, and the words are from tretton (13) to nitton (19).

    Some other countries, for instance Denmark, just use the word teenager to mean 13-19.

    --
    Harald