This should be your next question, hardware makers will "only" support windows, what about Linux, bsd and whatever else is out there, only means just one thing that and only that.
Do you really think there not already doing it,.. publishing it would only mean there not afraid to hide it any more and are willing to admit it openly. This also probably means they will use it in courts soon.
I think apple is ripping off people it's got like the most expensive devices out there yet, it's produced in the most horrible circumstances,.. I mean if it was cheap, I'd understand but this is pure greed.
But that's not directed at you directly,.. it not the same,.. if something happend to the plane it could crash in an ocean,.. if that hart fails at any time any place she'll die.
But, your point is valid I wonder how they got in charge in the first place, since I sure as hell didn't vote for them. What I think is even stranger, is how this goes against human rights,.. from what I understand is this is like observing innocent people before they commit a crime,.. I mean aren't you a criminal unless they prove you are, and isn't a government supposed to have a cause before they check on it's people, I mean they don't even want to share the treaty I mean wtf. Who are these people that they think they have the right to not share the law with us, if my rights are changing I'd sure like to know. To me this feels like entrapment, and what do they got to hide if they don't want to share it. What is so bad in there that they don't want to share it.
We are moving more and more towards china ten china is moving to an open system where there is freedom and such.
Your upper-casing of *US* is a bit confusing,.. you go through a lot of trouble of saying it's us the voters but at first glance i could confuse it with US of USA
Whatever there going to do,.. what this means is you don't get a trail, you have no human rights, and you could be held indefinitely just for theft, or at least when they think you stole something, cause last time I checked they don't even need proof, they just need to suspect you. It wasn't bad enough they let suspected terrorists go through this,.. I mean if you're accused of murder or mass murder you'd expect at least they got some proof,.. or at least that you get some sort of trail. Whatever they mean by it is bad.
indeed it is,.. the fukushima plant who came into trouble was 1-4 which where build from '67-'78 and in 2011 they had issues,.. to me it doesn't matter what the cause was, what matters is that they emitted radiation and had a melt down,.. whatever the reason if they can't prevent that don't build them. Which means 30 years would be a safe, 25 would seem more reasonable,.. no matter what they cost if they can't work with those time frames then it is probably not worth it and they should look for alternatives,.. after 25 years they should be reviewed,.. ofcourse they need to be reviewed every year,.. however it's a good step that they say they need to prove it is safe and not just assume they are safe, everything degrades with time.
Aren't they natural occurring species, hell they could get anywhere by plane or car or whatever they could travel along with us in many ways. This isn't a lab breath species,.. point is they are already out there what are you worrying about?
Also car seatbelt are bad for children especially buckling your kid without child seat could be deadly. Wearing a seatbelt is only safe when you wear it right and some people just don't fit the criteria, but wear them anyways because it is obligated. Skinny people tend to move forward before the seatbelt works and get killed because the belt moves up,... small people are just not on the right height to wear it and might get neck damage,.. you should be so judgmental in some cases wearing one is good but for others it's just as bad. Making a law for everyone to wear it to me is stupid.
>I'm all for it... as long as we-the-people don't have to pay for your hospital visit because you didn't wear the seatbelt.
Lol I wear mine,.. but I think it should be a choice,.. not an obligation,.. and you don't pay anyones hospital bill but your own,..
What do you mean chance,.. are you all claiming that live only exists on this planet in all those universes ? I mean they might not be intelligent, but life will find a way no matter what, thinking life only exists here is just plain stupid. I'm not claiming they came here to abduct people and shit like that, just suggesting out of all the solar systems out there, do any of you really believe that life only exists here ? To me that's just being naive.
Don't get me wrong it's really cool that they are able to do this, but that's just about it,.. It would cost more to grow sperm cells then paying someone to jerk off ! And they still need testicle tissue to grow it,... so eventually they still need to pay someone in order to get that tissue,... and then they need to pay for growing the sperm. Some people have issues with donating sperm, but how many of you want to get their testicles pierced in order to give a sample? And DNA doesn't fall from the sky so eventually they still need several donors like they do now, again I don't see the usefulness of this research, it's cool, and it probably has some value for understanding cells and shit, but don't think you'll see this on the market any time soon unless the father isn't able to grow his own sperm anymore,..
I don't know I don't mind getting a pork or ape heart,.. or whatever, yet I wouldn't want my kids grown from mouse cells. Also, they still need tissue from human males,.. which means to me that the sperm cells that are breath, will still contain that persons DNA, I mean wtf is the advantage that they wouldn't need someone jerking off anymore, but that's about it. Aside from that I don't really see any advantages,.. they still need a man to extract the tissue from. And it's going to cost,.. more to breath those sperm cells the only difference is the quality might be better cause age might not matter,.. anymore.
It's true a seatbelt can prevent injury, but can cause them as well I once saw this movie about a kid thrown out of a burning car had he worn his seat belt, he wouldn't have ever be able to get out, and there are many stories, of people who had to hear their kids burning, not being able to get into the car, but the kid not being able to leave it because of the seatbelt. Wearing a seatbelt is just as dangerous, as not wearing it.
It's like the car kit thing,.. using a car kit doesn't prevent the dangers of calling inside a car,.. or looking at your blinding gps screen when you're driving at night,.. talking to the person next to you is dangerous as well, having any conversation is dangerous, eating, smoking and so forth, are just as dangerous as calling someone.
I think people should decide for them selfs we are big enough to do so, instead of being obligated, I think it's ok for justice to say you're not supposed to steal kill whatever, but leave the crap like a seatbelt to the individual.
Never heard of sopa, but i think i saw something like it,.. called acta,.. by law they would ban encryption, also who says goverment can't already decrypt your shit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_bERAf5KAg
I would use a platform I know and has a good community supporting the platform,.. so if I write something I don't write 2000 exploits in just one script, and if i eventually do make a mistake or don't know how to do something, that i'll always got different points of view to fall back on.
Exactly the only sensible way to fight insects from eating the crops is to, set out insects that eat those insects,.. instead of working with pesticides, they should seriously think about breathing their natural enemies instead. And that doesn't require a lot of time to research, well the how to breath those insects maybe. Yet if the species evolves so might the predator that eats those. The only problem with that is probably that they can't patent it !
Just think about what companies do now with social networks,.. how they use that information,.. this shit is haunting peoples lives. About what they do in there free time,.. and I'm referring to the legal things they do. Those who pretend to be saints, are probably those have to hide the most. It's like when someone farts in a room usually the first one to speak is the one who let it fly. So those that say I don't care I've got nothing to hide probably got the most shit going on.
Slashdot Mirror
This should be your next question, hardware makers will "only" support windows, what about Linux, bsd and whatever else is out there, only means just one thing that and only that.
If that's the case you should ask your self if the victim is mentally able to decide on this matter.
I couldn't of said it better myself.
Exactly what I was thinking, now quit wasting time, lets go and steal a planet, so we got more.
Do you really think there not already doing it, .. publishing it would only mean there not afraid to hide it any more and are willing to admit it openly. This also probably means they will use it in courts soon.
I think apple is ripping off people it's got like the most expensive devices out there yet, it's produced in the most horrible circumstances, .. I mean if it was cheap, I'd understand but this is pure greed.
But that's not directed at you directly, .. it not the same, .. if something happend to the plane it could crash in an ocean, .. if that hart fails at any time any place she'll die.
But, your point is valid I wonder how they got in charge in the first place, since I sure as hell didn't vote for them. What I think is even stranger, is how this goes against human rights, .. from what I understand is this is like observing innocent people before they commit a crime, .. I mean aren't you a criminal unless they prove you are, and isn't a government supposed to have a cause before they check on it's people, I mean they don't even want to share the treaty I mean wtf. Who are these people that they think they have the right to not share the law with us, if my rights are changing I'd sure like to know. To me this feels like entrapment, and what do they got to hide if they don't want to share it. What is so bad in there that they don't want to share it.
We are moving more and more towards china ten china is moving to an open system where there is freedom and such.
Your upper-casing of *US* is a bit confusing, .. you go through a lot of trouble of saying it's us the voters but at first glance i could confuse it with US of USA
I don't think there asking, there telling us there going to do it.
this is like in the dark ages where the king says you're guilty and you are.
Whatever there going to do, .. what this means is you don't get a trail, you have no human rights, and you could be held indefinitely just for theft, or at least when they think you stole something, cause last time I checked they don't even need proof, they just need to suspect you. It wasn't bad enough they let suspected terrorists go through this, .. I mean if you're accused of murder or mass murder you'd expect at least they got some proof, .. or at least that you get some sort of trail. Whatever they mean by it is bad.
indeed it is, .. the fukushima plant who came into trouble was 1-4 which where build from '67-'78 and in 2011 they had issues, .. to me it doesn't matter what the cause was, what matters is that they emitted radiation and had a melt down, .. whatever the reason if they can't prevent that don't build them. Which means 30 years would be a safe, 25 would seem more reasonable, .. no matter what they cost if they can't work with those time frames then it is probably not worth it and they should look for alternatives, .. after 25 years they should be reviewed, .. ofcourse they need to be reviewed every year, .. however it's a good step that they say they need to prove it is safe and not just assume they are safe, everything degrades with time.
Aren't they natural occurring species, hell they could get anywhere by plane or car or whatever they could travel along with us in many ways. This isn't a lab breath species, .. point is they are already out there what are you worrying about?
Also car seatbelt are bad for children especially buckling your kid without child seat could be deadly. Wearing a seatbelt is only safe when you wear it right and some people just don't fit the criteria, but wear them anyways because it is obligated. Skinny people tend to move forward before the seatbelt works and get killed because the belt moves up, ... small people are just not on the right height to wear it and might get neck damage, .. you should be so judgmental in some cases wearing one is good but for others it's just as bad. Making a law for everyone to wear it to me is stupid.
>I'm all for it... as long as we-the-people don't have to pay for your hospital visit because you didn't wear the seatbelt.
Lol I wear mine, .. but I think it should be a choice, .. not an obligation, .. and you don't pay anyones hospital bill but your own, ..
I was referring to a news item where a baby was thrown out of a car not a movie, well maybe the word movie was wrong of me, .. i'll see if i can find the event.
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2011/12/13/little-known-seat-belt-danger-could-claim-life-of-child-in-seconds/
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=1194767n
i'm sure if you check google you'll find several, .. also i'll try and find the news event i was referring to.
What do you mean chance, .. are you all claiming that live only exists on this planet in all those universes ? I mean they might not be intelligent, but life will find a way no matter what, thinking life only exists here is just plain stupid. I'm not claiming they came here to abduct people and shit like that, just suggesting out of all the solar systems out there, do any of you really believe that life only exists here ? To me that's just being naive.
Don't get me wrong it's really cool that they are able to do this, but that's just about it, .. It would cost more to grow sperm cells then paying someone to jerk off ! And they still need testicle tissue to grow it, ... so eventually they still need to pay someone in order to get that tissue, ... and then they need to pay for growing the sperm. Some people have issues with donating sperm, but how many of you want to get their testicles pierced in order to give a sample? And DNA doesn't fall from the sky so eventually they still need several donors like they do now, again I don't see the usefulness of this research, it's cool, and it probably has some value for understanding cells and shit, but don't think you'll see this on the market any time soon unless the father isn't able to grow his own sperm anymore, ..
I don't know I don't mind getting a pork or ape heart, .. or whatever, yet I wouldn't want my kids grown from mouse cells. Also, they still need tissue from human males, .. which means to me that the sperm cells that are breath, will still contain that persons DNA, I mean wtf is the advantage that they wouldn't need someone jerking off anymore, but that's about it. Aside from that I don't really see any advantages, .. they still need a man to extract the tissue from. And it's going to cost, .. more to breath those sperm cells the only difference is the quality might be better cause age might not matter, .. anymore.
It's true a seatbelt can prevent injury, but can cause them as well I once saw this movie about a kid thrown out of a burning car had he worn his seat belt, he wouldn't have ever be able to get out, and there are many stories, of people who had to hear their kids burning, not being able to get into the car, but the kid not being able to leave it because of the seatbelt. Wearing a seatbelt is just as dangerous, as not wearing it. It's like the car kit thing, .. using a car kit doesn't prevent the dangers of calling inside a car, .. or looking at your blinding gps screen when you're driving at night, .. talking to the person next to you is dangerous as well, having any conversation is dangerous, eating, smoking and so forth, are just as dangerous as calling someone.
I think people should decide for them selfs we are big enough to do so, instead of being obligated, I think it's ok for justice to say you're not supposed to steal kill whatever, but leave the crap like a seatbelt to the individual.
Or it's the other way around the Chinese are there to spy on X-37B, since it was there first :p
Never heard of sopa, but i think i saw something like it, .. called acta, .. by law they would ban encryption, also who says goverment can't already decrypt your shit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_bERAf5KAg
I would use a platform I know and has a good community supporting the platform, .. so if I write something I don't write 2000 exploits in just one script, and if i eventually do make a mistake or don't know how to do something, that i'll always got different points of view to fall back on.
Exactly the only sensible way to fight insects from eating the crops is to, set out insects that eat those insects, .. instead of working with pesticides, they should seriously think about breathing their natural enemies instead. And that doesn't require a lot of time to research, well the how to breath those insects maybe. Yet if the species evolves so might the predator that eats those. The only problem with that is probably that they can't patent it !
Just think about what companies do now with social networks, .. how they use that information, .. this shit is haunting peoples lives. About what they do in there free time, .. and I'm referring to the legal things they do. Those who pretend to be saints, are probably those have to hide the most. It's like when someone farts in a room usually the first one to speak is the one who let it fly. So those that say I don't care I've got nothing to hide probably got the most shit going on.