I'd personally clone the relevant genes for cannabinoid production into intestinal bacteria and put them in an operon triggered by a readily available substance. Want a high? Eat some malt sugar...
Oh my, little one, I am not even American. I just watch you from my European socialist hellhole. Please, go ahead, Perry for president... I just pity the decent guys over there that your ilk wants to drag down into your retarded vision.
How dense are you to not get that he was not espousing any religious belief. He was just talking about bloody science. I agree with you that he was in the right, but what the fuck has taking pure simple scientific truth to do with religious speak??
I don't think so. Are you not pushing the idea that this is a freedom of religion matter? Since when is talking about reality in a scientific manner a matter of freedom of religion?
Ohh, St. Reagan's Voodoo Economics, peace be upon him. Listen, mate, the US have a wealth disparity that is about the level of a third world banana republic. Nothing is trickling down, except the rich pissing on the rest. It is the goddamn fucking duty of any journalist worth his salt to point this out at every possible occasion.
If you need to ask slashdot how to do your professional work, may I suggest that you get another job more appropriate for your skills - like, flipping burgers or something?
This has not the slightest bit to do with the teacher's freedom of religion. He told the truth. Should telling the truth suddenly become unconstitutional when the truth hurts some religious feelings?
Ah, yeah, Behe and Dembski. Two little fraudulent lying fucks. Obviously there his a huge "proper" distinction between creationists and cdesign proponentsists...
Has it ever, in your tiny little ideologically polluted brain, come to you that something one says might be judged on whether it is fact based? Mendel did research, the proper way, so why would you toss him out because he is a monk? That is your thinking there, your bigotry, projected onto others. Thanks for showing your colors, coward.
If the truth is in conflict with a religion - or rather, a quite heretical interpretation of said religion - telling the truth is no government act against the religion, sorry.
Well, you are "The Creator". Why the fuck didn't you make it so, then? Oh, and I have a whole lot of other questions regarding your fuck-ups, creation-wise...;)
Not much racism in there. But the utter, mind-bending stupidity of her pseudo-philosophical rambling obviously opens up the mind for any random kind of bullshit.
Well, your brain seems not to be able of much thinking anyway. On behalf of the Socialist International - take your claims of being on the "extreme-left" and shove them up your tight little Nazi arse. We don't appreciate you little racists fucks around here.
In case that grain of sand was contaminated with, say, a fast-spreading, airborne Ebola variant, I'd consider sterilizing it indeed. And rather before I'd have to sterilize a whole city the thermonuclear way...
It's standard usage in Dungeons and Dragons Online. A newb is a new player, he is fresh and has to learn. A noob is someone with a certain state of mind, an unwillingness to learn coupled with self-professed mastery. A newb asks if he should wield a greataxe as a monk, a noob does it and proclaims it to be uber.
Haven't made enough of those to really give you an answer here - but our archive should give me a somewhat significant sample. I'll see if I can spot a pattern there, but honestly, I don't believe it. Personally, I get my stuff approved in Europe faster than in the US. Except for computer based stuff, which usually gets smacked hard in Europe - but such applications I usually only see coming from the US to be filed in Europe, so I can't really comment on the granting practices in the US in that field. I just object to the "USPTO is rubber-stamping everything"-meme. It's just not true.
Painting a whole religion with millions of followers into the pedophile corner is bigotry. Pointing out a problem that is, in some parts, indeed institutional, would not be. Painting with the broad brush is. Stereotyping in general is. I am as atheist as they come, but I definitely see bigotry here. I do agree that in broad terms the group you mention are worth of far more attention, since they are still institutionally persecuted, which the catholics are not, but the mechanism is the same here, the state of mind behind the joke is the same as the one behind a nigger joke - only less severe due to the more privileged nature of the group attacked.
Yeah. Cut taxes from a historic low when the revenues suck. Sure. Brilliant. The only points I can fully agree with is stopping the wars and reduce the prison population. The rest is juicy voodoo economics...
To be honest, doing application in traditional tech fields, mostly metallurgy, casting, automobile tech, most of the stuff I do in the US leaves me with the impression that the USPTO is going by a deny first - ask questions later strategy. You might want to find real points to criticize - perhaps start with the retarded common law system...
In the business, we call that an ex post facto view. People screaming "Oh, I could have done it" after some invention is disclosed are about as witty as people screaming "I could have made that" when looking at a piece of modern art. Well, the key point is, you haven't and no one else has either.
Slashdot Mirror
I'd personally clone the relevant genes for cannabinoid production into intestinal bacteria and put them in an operon triggered by a readily available substance. Want a high? Eat some malt sugar...
Oh my, little one, I am not even American. I just watch you from my European socialist hellhole. Please, go ahead, Perry for president... I just pity the decent guys over there that your ilk wants to drag down into your retarded vision.
How dense are you to not get that he was not espousing any religious belief. He was just talking about bloody science. I agree with you that he was in the right, but what the fuck has taking pure simple scientific truth to do with religious speak??
I don't think so. Are you not pushing the idea that this is a freedom of religion matter? Since when is talking about reality in a scientific manner a matter of freedom of religion?
Ahhh.... That's how it works. I am enlightened, Master.
Would it have to be located in Ciudad Juarez or Tijuana to qualify for Mos Eisley status?
True. In large parts, the car created a need - as evidenced by the abomination that is suburbia.
Ohh, St. Reagan's Voodoo Economics, peace be upon him. Listen, mate, the US have a wealth disparity that is about the level of a third world banana republic. Nothing is trickling down, except the rich pissing on the rest. It is the goddamn fucking duty of any journalist worth his salt to point this out at every possible occasion.
If you need to ask slashdot how to do your professional work, may I suggest that you get another job more appropriate for your skills - like, flipping burgers or something?
This has not the slightest bit to do with the teacher's freedom of religion. He told the truth. Should telling the truth suddenly become unconstitutional when the truth hurts some religious feelings?
Ah, yeah, Behe and Dembski. Two little fraudulent lying fucks. Obviously there his a huge "proper" distinction between creationists and cdesign proponentsists...
Has it ever, in your tiny little ideologically polluted brain, come to you that something one says might be judged on whether it is fact based? Mendel did research, the proper way, so why would you toss him out because he is a monk? That is your thinking there, your bigotry, projected onto others. Thanks for showing your colors, coward.
If the truth is in conflict with a religion - or rather, a quite heretical interpretation of said religion - telling the truth is no government act against the religion, sorry.
Well, you are "The Creator". Why the fuck didn't you make it so, then? Oh, and I have a whole lot of other questions regarding your fuck-ups, creation-wise... ;)
Not much racism in there. But the utter, mind-bending stupidity of her pseudo-philosophical rambling obviously opens up the mind for any random kind of bullshit.
Then she should not work there anyway- Why would I work anywhere where 70 hours weeks are demanded? They can take their exploitation and shove it.
Well, your brain seems not to be able of much thinking anyway. On behalf of the Socialist International - take your claims of being on the "extreme-left" and shove them up your tight little Nazi arse. We don't appreciate you little racists fucks around here.
Waah! Waah! I am a white male and I am OPRESSED! PERSECUTED! Them atheists are probably even after you for your Christianity, no?
In case that grain of sand was contaminated with, say, a fast-spreading, airborne Ebola variant, I'd consider sterilizing it indeed. And rather before I'd have to sterilize a whole city the thermonuclear way...
It's standard usage in Dungeons and Dragons Online. A newb is a new player, he is fresh and has to learn. A noob is someone with a certain state of mind, an unwillingness to learn coupled with self-professed mastery. A newb asks if he should wield a greataxe as a monk, a noob does it and proclaims it to be uber.
Haven't made enough of those to really give you an answer here - but our archive should give me a somewhat significant sample. I'll see if I can spot a pattern there, but honestly, I don't believe it. Personally, I get my stuff approved in Europe faster than in the US. Except for computer based stuff, which usually gets smacked hard in Europe - but such applications I usually only see coming from the US to be filed in Europe, so I can't really comment on the granting practices in the US in that field. I just object to the "USPTO is rubber-stamping everything"-meme. It's just not true.
Painting a whole religion with millions of followers into the pedophile corner is bigotry. Pointing out a problem that is, in some parts, indeed institutional, would not be. Painting with the broad brush is. Stereotyping in general is. I am as atheist as they come, but I definitely see bigotry here. I do agree that in broad terms the group you mention are worth of far more attention, since they are still institutionally persecuted, which the catholics are not, but the mechanism is the same here, the state of mind behind the joke is the same as the one behind a nigger joke - only less severe due to the more privileged nature of the group attacked.
Yeah. Cut taxes from a historic low when the revenues suck. Sure. Brilliant. The only points I can fully agree with is stopping the wars and reduce the prison population. The rest is juicy voodoo economics...
To be honest, doing application in traditional tech fields, mostly metallurgy, casting, automobile tech, most of the stuff I do in the US leaves me with the impression that the USPTO is going by a deny first - ask questions later strategy. You might want to find real points to criticize - perhaps start with the retarded common law system...
In the business, we call that an ex post facto view. People screaming "Oh, I could have done it" after some invention is disclosed are about as witty as people screaming "I could have made that" when looking at a piece of modern art. Well, the key point is, you haven't and no one else has either.