very high compression has limited utility if it takes an extremely long time
I don't see how the utility is limited. Most content is mastered once and viewed millions of time.
How much time it takes to compress is irrelevant, even if you get diminishing returns the longer you take. What's important is to save space when broadcasting the content.
Good domain-specific tools are written as command-line utilities, and are even better if you wrote them yourself for your project. Text editing (which includes syntax highlighting etc.) is also much better with a text editor.
Editors are also more flexible, scale better for large projects, and can do anything you need them to do. An IDE is extremely constrained and won't work properly whenever you need to do something that wasn't planned by the developer who coded it.
Garbage collection necessarily wastes memory by factor of 1.5 to 2. The collection itself also slows down the program, and in some languages cannot even happen asynchronously.
Finally, the most important aspect for program performance is locality and memory layout, something you cannot even optimize for in a language where every object is a pointer to some memory on a garbage-collected heap.
There are research papers on the subject of finding the best path, it isn't exactly simple. Take a look at what Microsoft has done for Bing Maps for example: http://research.microsoft.com/...
Slashdot Mirror
I don't see how the utility is limited.
Most content is mastered once and viewed millions of time.
How much time it takes to compress is irrelevant, even if you get diminishing returns the longer you take. What's important is to save space when broadcasting the content.
The front end and the back end are separate.
This one had pretty serious performance problems. 4.7 is one of the best.
The word you're looking for is 'propaganda'.
4.8 was even worse.
That's hardly news.
This is what Nao from Aldebaran is.
Good domain-specific tools are written as command-line utilities, and are even better if you wrote them yourself for your project.
Text editing (which includes syntax highlighting etc.) is also much better with a text editor.
Editors are also more flexible, scale better for large projects, and can do anything you need them to do.
An IDE is extremely constrained and won't work properly whenever you need to do something that wasn't planned by the developer who coded it.
I guess that depends on the market, and possibly on your price.
And finding new clients and negotiating contracts doesn't take time?
Why are you even using an IDE? If you want to be the most productive, use a multi-purpose text editor.
Garbage collection necessarily wastes memory by factor of 1.5 to 2.
The collection itself also slows down the program, and in some languages cannot even happen asynchronously.
Finally, the most important aspect for program performance is locality and memory layout, something you cannot even optimize for in a language where every object is a pointer to some memory on a garbage-collected heap.
Not if they use pngcrush first.
Why is it women who are showing off the product?
Surely they were not involved in the design of this technology.
I own a website in France with a payment service that I subscribed from my French bank.
I am not allowed to store anything.
Amazon is in another country so that they can provide the one-click purchase thing.
This is already what Amazon is doing to circumvent French regulations that prevent websites from storing credit card information.
They're still subject to other laws though.
There are research papers on the subject of finding the best path, it isn't exactly simple.
Take a look at what Microsoft has done for Bing Maps for example:
http://research.microsoft.com/...
In Chinese. But when speaking about the game in English, people use 'go'.
I see, I thought you meant for a single path.
What sort of software project doesn't enforce proper indentation?
Badly indented code doesn't pass code reviews.
Curly brackets are most aesthetically pleasing.
How is a language without personality and history any good?
Natural languages are not meant to be formal.
Who the hell calls 'go' 'weiqi' ?
Path finding isn't embarassingly parallel. It can be parallelized, but it's quite challenging.
I bought my GPU for 250 dollars 4 years ago and it still runs all games on high settings.
One of the most famous personal robot (Nao) uses an Intel x86 processor, which is bigger and uses more power than a Pi.