They're just chasing the new money and the new paradigms having milked all they could from the old ones.
MS Management sees all the 20-something whiz kids writing mobile apps and figures everything to do with that is the future, and it's certainly where all the double-digit growth and money is.
"The existing developer base" isn't even seen as a constituency -- they're not doing anything lucrative and growth-oriented, and they're likely to be replaced with slave labor from India anyway, eliminating their involvement even in that legacy market.
Between outright protectionism, monopolization, eliminating consumer protection and criminalizing IP laws, corporations will not suffer from poor decision making.
IMHO, this entire issue is inexorably tied to the increasing wealth and income inequality in the U.S.
If getting an education led to quality employment at a reasonable living wage, with real possibility of advancement, people would take corporations at face value and believe the "need" for short-term fixes for a labor shortage.
Instead, unemployment remains stubbornly high, anyone over 40 losing their job faces the real chance of long-term unemployment and a permanent loss of economic status AND we're being told there are too many openings and not enough employees? It's just not believable, and it sounds like what it is, a chance to create third-world job markets in the US.
It makes me crazy that most "Farmer's Markets" here in Minneapolis (including the big one just north of downtown) are flooded with produce not grown in Minnesota.
IMHO, sellers whose products are GROWN in Minnesota should pay far less for stall space, and sellers whose products aren't should pay double and be forced to post signage that says "OUR PRODUCTS ARE NOT GROWN IN MINNESOTA".
Electrical costs are estimated low, so they try to use the minimum amount of supplies and labor to do the job. This means its often easier to wire from the closest junction box (shortest amount of cable, least labor) than to structure the entire house, tying rooms/outlets to specific breakers.
In my case, rewiring an existing house built in 1955 added to it, since doing it "right" would have taken more materials and involved more ripping up of wallboard.
I think this is fairly common advice for driving up long mountain passes in the summer -- if your car engine starts to rise, turn on the heater to high to help shed engine heat through the heater/passenger compartment.
In my case, I have the "entry" level Comcast Business service and based on their speed test, I'm limited to 4-5 Mbps up (I just measured, and down shows 33MBps, which can't be right, usually its around 12).
This isn't enough, really, for any serious hosting but I've run my own mail server for 10 years (initially on a 768k/768k DSL line!) and bandwidth really isn't a problem.
I realize my solution is big money for most average end-user types who might have a spare PC, but it sure makes it easy to run stuff.
Every house I've ever lived in had the most fucked up electric dependencies you can imagine, with outlets in totally different parts of the house sharing breakers. Of course I always found out the same way you did, having a hair dryer in one room grenade the power in another room.
My current house was substantially rewired before I moved in and I suspect to keep drywall repair at a minimum, they wired stuff to whatever power was convenient.
When we remodeled our house, I had the electrician upgrade our electric service to 200A from 100A and add an entirely new panel (the old panel was slaved to the new panel, new panel became the "primary" panel). I had explicit instructions (in writing!) to the electrician that in places the outlets were to be on INDEPENDENT breakers, not shared by any other outlet.
But what did they do? Wired outlets to ANY convenient source of power, including the outlets in my office, which were supposed to have been on their own breaker, which they wired to an OUTSIDE outlet!
Thankfully I gave my instructions to them in writing and they were forced to come back and fix their wiring and a bunch of drywall repair and painting. They didn't even bother to try to charge me for the extra materials. All told I think they lost money on this job.
I put together a two node cluster with a 5.x TB RAID-10 iSCSI SAN for something around $3000. The storage (QNAP TurboNAS 669) was the most expensive item. I went with MicroATX motherboards for size, but was limited to 32 GB RAM per board and a single Core-i5 quad core Ivy Bridge CPU. Boot is diskless via USB flash.
I run VMware because I get NFR keys from work, but there are free virtualization systems available, even from VMware.
The big picture advantage is that you get a lot of bang for your buck -- 64 GB (total) RAM and 5.x TB of disk buys you a lot of VMs, enough to run some some as "production" and some in tire-kicking lab mode.
I keep thinking "next time" I'll try the paid/hosted route but it seems unlikely I'll get nearly 6 TB of disk + 8 cores + 64 GB of RAM at any kind of a monthly price that would make sense.
Even if this system is nearly obsolete in 4 years, it's hard to see a hosted solution competing with this on cost and flexibility.
How do you run out of disk space in a managed computing environment anymore?
I know we're talking a non-profit entity, but they can't NFS mount a couple of terabytes of disk from another system, like an inexpensive Debian-x86 box?
Gavin Newsom is a big, swinging dick in San Francisco city government and he gets what he wants from his IT department, rÃpidamente.
Once all his shit is outsourced to some "cloud provider", he's nothing more than yet another adulterer in San Francisco, just another entry in a vast database and he will NOT have his service expectations met.
China can demand all they want but the bummer for them is that the debt is denominated in our own sovereign currency. We can just print cash to pay them if we want.
We could also just decide to void that debt and not repay it. It would substantive consequences, but those may be more ambiguous than whatever action the Chinese were considering.
I think the primary reason they buy Treasuries is to keep their currency in check. Getting paid back is nice, but I'm pretty sure investment isn't the principal goal.
Comcast is what I'm thinking of specifically -- they provision your *modem* to talk to the local head end at ridiculous bandwidth numbers but in my experience, once you go over about 25 Mbps in most areas you never see it, even if you are provisioned at 50 or even 100 Mbps.
I've been caught in the middle with customers who have equipment provisioned at the 100 Mbps level before who see nowhere near this, even on Comcast's own cheesy bandwidth meter. The customers insist something is wrong with their equipment (since this is what Comcast suggests), and trying to explain the nature of Comcast's network and where bottlenecks occur isn't easy (especially when you're making assumptions of your own).
Personally, I think ISPs should be required when selling a given bandwidth tier to actually label it based on the ability to burst for at least 5 minutes at the maximum throughput level @ layer 3 during ANY time of day to an off network peer.
It's completely dishonest to sell 100 Mbps of throughput when you only have the local upstream backhaul provisioned at that speed and it's shared by many people.
Corporate America used to offer pensions to their employees but as greedy, how-can-we-cash-out-today management thinking took over they stopped funding their pensions adequately, basically doing what USPS was doing, "borrowing" from the future.
As management drains more and more from the company, they eventually file bankruptcy which gives them the green light to unload their pensions "under financial duress" to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, who then takes on the pension obligations.
It sounds like a good idea, except that PBGC gets to meat-axe pension benefits and people who were expecting to live on pensions find that the benefits they were promised as workers are no longer enough to live on.
While the whole story is sordid -- many workers accepted lower wages in exchange for generous pension benefits, and corporations who underfund their benefits for short-term profits get to hand the mess over to someone else, scot-free -- why can't the USPS play by those same rules?
IMHO the USPS can't ever be a success; they have all the handicaps of a government entity, plus burdens that corporate America gets to escape from.
Not the first time a KAV update has broken something. KAV for Exchange has had several updates come out that stomped on Store.EXE and kept it from running at all without uninstalling KAV for Exchange.
Client-side breakage seems less common, but unless you're running an SSD RAID-10 disk system with an 8 core CPU, you're always wise to dial back some of the Kaspersky defaults or you will find your machine unusable.
It also helps to reduce the frequency of updates. The default is something ludicrous like every hour or two. This provides two benefits -- one, when the update kicks off it generates a crushing amount of disk and CPU activity that throttles lesser machines, the other benefit is that you're much less likely to suck down broken definition updates as it's likely that the bad ones will be found and removed or fixed before you update.
It was AWESOME for the time it came out, especially as a cassette replacement.
Cassettes were fragile, made all kinds of noise with tape hiss, bulky (carrying more than 2-3 when commuting was a headache), at best you had "music search" which would fast forward to the next gap in the program otherwise there was no random access or shuffle, they could be reused but I always found this to be less than desirable without using a degauss gizmo or recording white noise over the tape and then re-using it.
The deck would edit (delete songs, trim songs), you could title tracks and get exact MM:SS readouts (no more mix tapes with awkward spaces at the end), the media itself were compact so carrying a half-dozen commuting wasn't a hassle, the media were far more durable and reusable.
About the only thing I thought was "bad" was that duration seemed to max out at 74 minutes (I was a C-90 cassette user) and the walkman unit that I owned seemed to be a little heavy on batteries, but that wasn't a huge issue for commuting (I swapped in fresh NiMH AAs daily).
Totally obsolete now. It's too bad Sony didn't wise up and make the Walkman units USB compatible for disc read/write and let them play MP3 files. I would have kept using mine for a long time as 160 megs would have made for a decent number of MP3s.
Part of what taxes -- and especially taxes on businesses -- pays for is their participation in a Rule of Law society.
This means you have access to an independent court of law for adjudication of claims against you and claims you may make (especially important when you rely on intellectual property), a civil and military security force to protect your physical assets and employees from harm, and a transparent law-making regime you may lobby to see your interests are represented.
I'm just fine with companies moving, but I'm just as fine with not allowing them to participate in the benefits provided by a Rule of Law society. Feel free to relocate to the third world and feel just as free to see how well the Cayman Islands or Lichtenstein or some of these other tax-dodge nations can protect your global shipments or your factories or your intellectual property.
There's only a small handful of countries able to provide a Rule of Law society and they should band together via treaty to inhibit transnational games and tax dodges.
RICO prosecutions would help. It's what should have been done with Spam in the early days when it started to become profitable.
Drag in the banks, the ISPs, and the other supposedly reputable service providers into the RICO prosecutions. Once a couple of well-known institutions get caught like this it would cut off the air supply of the illegal action and make it much, much more difficult.
By not doing this, we only encourage our supposedly legitimate institution to keep providing services to people who actually committing crimes.
I had a ton of fun with the "foreign" students in college who were most like me -- Europeans (British, Irish, German, Czech). They talked in class (even when language was a challenge), they socialized, I brought them home, went on trips, got invited overseas to live at their houses and they smuggled over fresh beer, food and cigarettes.
The non-European students were completely invisible. They didn't socialize, they didn't speak up in class, and they only spent time with each other. There was a guy from Kenya I met at a bar a few times (we seemed to have the same drinking schedule) but that didn't really count.
Was there a benefit? At the time it was fun to meet the European kids, but the reality is that you don't learn much from people the same as you. They smoke different kinds of cigarettes, but they are almost identical otherwise.
It was the non-Europeans who would have had the biggest benefit, but they didn't participate.
It's a nice bargaining chip, but China also faces a lot of risk from a massive refugee crisis and all the destabilization that would occur should North Korea end up in a shooting situation with the US or South Korea.
NK works well as a foil for the US, but the risk they run is that should a shooting situation occur, the Chinese will have a few million North Koreans crossing the Yellow River creating utter chaos.
I think it existed sometime between the end of World War II and that point in the 1970s when inflation jacked up the cost of living. During that era most households had only one wage earner, lived in decent housing and had a (historically) high disposable income.
Inflation hosed the cost of everything relative to income and from that point on you had trickle-down economics that cut taxes on the wealthy and capital gains, and low-cost computing enabled the rapid expansion of financial engineering and cost cutting which led to further large gains for the capital owning class and losses for those who became cut costs (cuts in salaries, benefits, etc).
I think the assumption is that manufacturing jobs had in many ways achieved "middle class" status by the late 1960s. They had pay that allowed a spouse to not work, health benefits, pensions and enabled the workers to own their own home and an automobile.
Most of the jobs you listed I would call "professional" jobs that either require post-secondary education (doctor, lawyer, professors) or substantial certifications (accountant, architect, financial managers, nurses).
A lot of those jobs (doctors, lawyers, etc) I've seen classified lately as HENRY -- High Earners, Not Rich Yet.
Ironically, a lot of the manufacturing jobs of "today" that I've been exposed to are very sophisticated, requiring high level computer skills in addition to a lot of knowledge on operating complex machinery as well as knowledge about what the machinery does (ie, welding, or metallurgy, etc).
At least to read the business section in the paper, they make it sound like these are the "future" of manufacturing and that people with these skills can produce greater volume and quality than the oft-cited overseas labor.
Slashdot Mirror
They're just chasing the new money and the new paradigms having milked all they could from the old ones.
MS Management sees all the 20-something whiz kids writing mobile apps and figures everything to do with that is the future, and it's certainly where all the double-digit growth and money is.
"The existing developer base" isn't even seen as a constituency -- they're not doing anything lucrative and growth-oriented, and they're likely to be replaced with slave labor from India anyway, eliminating their involvement even in that legacy market.
Between outright protectionism, monopolization, eliminating consumer protection and criminalizing IP laws, corporations will not suffer from poor decision making.
IMHO, this entire issue is inexorably tied to the increasing wealth and income inequality in the U.S.
If getting an education led to quality employment at a reasonable living wage, with real possibility of advancement, people would take corporations at face value and believe the "need" for short-term fixes for a labor shortage.
Instead, unemployment remains stubbornly high, anyone over 40 losing their job faces the real chance of long-term unemployment and a permanent loss of economic status AND we're being told there are too many openings and not enough employees? It's just not believable, and it sounds like what it is, a chance to create third-world job markets in the US.
It makes me crazy that most "Farmer's Markets" here in Minneapolis (including the big one just north of downtown) are flooded with produce not grown in Minnesota.
IMHO, sellers whose products are GROWN in Minnesota should pay far less for stall space, and sellers whose products aren't should pay double and be forced to post signage that says "OUR PRODUCTS ARE NOT GROWN IN MINNESOTA".
Cost is usually the source of the problem.
Electrical costs are estimated low, so they try to use the minimum amount of supplies and labor to do the job. This means its often easier to wire from the closest junction box (shortest amount of cable, least labor) than to structure the entire house, tying rooms/outlets to specific breakers.
In my case, rewiring an existing house built in 1955 added to it, since doing it "right" would have taken more materials and involved more ripping up of wallboard.
I think this is fairly common advice for driving up long mountain passes in the summer -- if your car engine starts to rise, turn on the heater to high to help shed engine heat through the heater/passenger compartment.
In my case, I have the "entry" level Comcast Business service and based on their speed test, I'm limited to 4-5 Mbps up (I just measured, and down shows 33MBps, which can't be right, usually its around 12).
This isn't enough, really, for any serious hosting but I've run my own mail server for 10 years (initially on a 768k/768k DSL line!) and bandwidth really isn't a problem.
I realize my solution is big money for most average end-user types who might have a spare PC, but it sure makes it easy to run stuff.
Every house I've ever lived in had the most fucked up electric dependencies you can imagine, with outlets in totally different parts of the house sharing breakers. Of course I always found out the same way you did, having a hair dryer in one room grenade the power in another room.
My current house was substantially rewired before I moved in and I suspect to keep drywall repair at a minimum, they wired stuff to whatever power was convenient.
When we remodeled our house, I had the electrician upgrade our electric service to 200A from 100A and add an entirely new panel (the old panel was slaved to the new panel, new panel became the "primary" panel). I had explicit instructions (in writing!) to the electrician that in places the outlets were to be on INDEPENDENT breakers, not shared by any other outlet.
But what did they do? Wired outlets to ANY convenient source of power, including the outlets in my office, which were supposed to have been on their own breaker, which they wired to an OUTSIDE outlet!
Thankfully I gave my instructions to them in writing and they were forced to come back and fix their wiring and a bunch of drywall repair and painting. They didn't even bother to try to charge me for the extra materials. All told I think they lost money on this job.
I put together a two node cluster with a 5.x TB RAID-10 iSCSI SAN for something around $3000. The storage (QNAP TurboNAS 669) was the most expensive item. I went with MicroATX motherboards for size, but was limited to 32 GB RAM per board and a single Core-i5 quad core Ivy Bridge CPU. Boot is diskless via USB flash.
I run VMware because I get NFR keys from work, but there are free virtualization systems available, even from VMware.
The big picture advantage is that you get a lot of bang for your buck -- 64 GB (total) RAM and 5.x TB of disk buys you a lot of VMs, enough to run some some as "production" and some in tire-kicking lab mode.
I keep thinking "next time" I'll try the paid/hosted route but it seems unlikely I'll get nearly 6 TB of disk + 8 cores + 64 GB of RAM at any kind of a monthly price that would make sense.
Even if this system is nearly obsolete in 4 years, it's hard to see a hosted solution competing with this on cost and flexibility.
How do you run out of disk space in a managed computing environment anymore?
I know we're talking a non-profit entity, but they can't NFS mount a couple of terabytes of disk from another system, like an inexpensive Debian-x86 box?
Gavin Newsom is a big, swinging dick in San Francisco city government and he gets what he wants from his IT department, rÃpidamente.
Once all his shit is outsourced to some "cloud provider", he's nothing more than yet another adulterer in San Francisco, just another entry in a vast database and he will NOT have his service expectations met.
And then he'll have another IT department.
China can demand all they want but the bummer for them is that the debt is denominated in our own sovereign currency. We can just print cash to pay them if we want.
We could also just decide to void that debt and not repay it. It would substantive consequences, but those may be more ambiguous than whatever action the Chinese were considering.
I think the primary reason they buy Treasuries is to keep their currency in check. Getting paid back is nice, but I'm pretty sure investment isn't the principal goal.
How about some honesty in bandwidth numbers?
Comcast is what I'm thinking of specifically -- they provision your *modem* to talk to the local head end at ridiculous bandwidth numbers but in my experience, once you go over about 25 Mbps in most areas you never see it, even if you are provisioned at 50 or even 100 Mbps.
I've been caught in the middle with customers who have equipment provisioned at the 100 Mbps level before who see nowhere near this, even on Comcast's own cheesy bandwidth meter. The customers insist something is wrong with their equipment (since this is what Comcast suggests), and trying to explain the nature of Comcast's network and where bottlenecks occur isn't easy (especially when you're making assumptions of your own).
Personally, I think ISPs should be required when selling a given bandwidth tier to actually label it based on the ability to burst for at least 5 minutes at the maximum throughput level @ layer 3 during ANY time of day to an off network peer.
It's completely dishonest to sell 100 Mbps of throughput when you only have the local upstream backhaul provisioned at that speed and it's shared by many people.
In other words, the amount of data layer 4 can send/transmit in a given unit of time.
Layer 3 is nearly as close, but it may include more data that's not inherently "usable" but necessary (TCP overhead, ICMP packets, etc).
Layer 2, with its many levels of encapsulation on the ISP side is less valuable because it involves so much overhead.
Corporate America used to offer pensions to their employees but as greedy, how-can-we-cash-out-today management thinking took over they stopped funding their pensions adequately, basically doing what USPS was doing, "borrowing" from the future.
As management drains more and more from the company, they eventually file bankruptcy which gives them the green light to unload their pensions "under financial duress" to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, who then takes on the pension obligations.
It sounds like a good idea, except that PBGC gets to meat-axe pension benefits and people who were expecting to live on pensions find that the benefits they were promised as workers are no longer enough to live on.
While the whole story is sordid -- many workers accepted lower wages in exchange for generous pension benefits, and corporations who underfund their benefits for short-term profits get to hand the mess over to someone else, scot-free -- why can't the USPS play by those same rules?
IMHO the USPS can't ever be a success; they have all the handicaps of a government entity, plus burdens that corporate America gets to escape from.
Not the first time a KAV update has broken something. KAV for Exchange has had several updates come out that stomped on Store.EXE and kept it from running at all without uninstalling KAV for Exchange.
Client-side breakage seems less common, but unless you're running an SSD RAID-10 disk system with an 8 core CPU, you're always wise to dial back some of the Kaspersky defaults or you will find your machine unusable.
It also helps to reduce the frequency of updates. The default is something ludicrous like every hour or two. This provides two benefits -- one, when the update kicks off it generates a crushing amount of disk and CPU activity that throttles lesser machines, the other benefit is that you're much less likely to suck down broken definition updates as it's likely that the bad ones will be found and removed or fixed before you update.
It was AWESOME for the time it came out, especially as a cassette replacement.
Cassettes were fragile, made all kinds of noise with tape hiss, bulky (carrying more than 2-3 when commuting was a headache), at best you had "music search" which would fast forward to the next gap in the program otherwise there was no random access or shuffle, they could be reused but I always found this to be less than desirable without using a degauss gizmo or recording white noise over the tape and then re-using it.
The deck would edit (delete songs, trim songs), you could title tracks and get exact MM:SS readouts (no more mix tapes with awkward spaces at the end), the media itself were compact so carrying a half-dozen commuting wasn't a hassle, the media were far more durable and reusable.
About the only thing I thought was "bad" was that duration seemed to max out at 74 minutes (I was a C-90 cassette user) and the walkman unit that I owned seemed to be a little heavy on batteries, but that wasn't a huge issue for commuting (I swapped in fresh NiMH AAs daily).
Totally obsolete now. It's too bad Sony didn't wise up and make the Walkman units USB compatible for disc read/write and let them play MP3 files. I would have kept using mine for a long time as 160 megs would have made for a decent number of MP3s.
Part of what taxes -- and especially taxes on businesses -- pays for is their participation in a Rule of Law society.
This means you have access to an independent court of law for adjudication of claims against you and claims you may make (especially important when you rely on intellectual property), a civil and military security force to protect your physical assets and employees from harm, and a transparent law-making regime you may lobby to see your interests are represented.
I'm just fine with companies moving, but I'm just as fine with not allowing them to participate in the benefits provided by a Rule of Law society. Feel free to relocate to the third world and feel just as free to see how well the Cayman Islands or Lichtenstein or some of these other tax-dodge nations can protect your global shipments or your factories or your intellectual property.
There's only a small handful of countries able to provide a Rule of Law society and they should band together via treaty to inhibit transnational games and tax dodges.
RICO prosecutions would help. It's what should have been done with Spam in the early days when it started to become profitable.
Drag in the banks, the ISPs, and the other supposedly reputable service providers into the RICO prosecutions. Once a couple of well-known institutions get caught like this it would cut off the air supply of the illegal action and make it much, much more difficult.
By not doing this, we only encourage our supposedly legitimate institution to keep providing services to people who actually committing crimes.
Those who actively participated in the LIBOR fraud should be permanently stripped of all their material possessions.
In sum, they need to be placed in a perpetual state of poverty which they cannot escape, a kind of financial death penalty which they may not escape.
I had a ton of fun with the "foreign" students in college who were most like me -- Europeans (British, Irish, German, Czech). They talked in class (even when language was a challenge), they socialized, I brought them home, went on trips, got invited overseas to live at their houses and they smuggled over fresh beer, food and cigarettes.
The non-European students were completely invisible. They didn't socialize, they didn't speak up in class, and they only spent time with each other. There was a guy from Kenya I met at a bar a few times (we seemed to have the same drinking schedule) but that didn't really count.
Was there a benefit? At the time it was fun to meet the European kids, but the reality is that you don't learn much from people the same as you. They smoke different kinds of cigarettes, but they are almost identical otherwise.
It was the non-Europeans who would have had the biggest benefit, but they didn't participate.
I think this is more about the PC makers than MS. I've read their margins are so low that the actual profit they make comes from third party add-ons.
Well, if you can sabotage PLCs in a power plant and cause it to blow up, maybe.
It's a nice bargaining chip, but China also faces a lot of risk from a massive refugee crisis and all the destabilization that would occur should North Korea end up in a shooting situation with the US or South Korea.
NK works well as a foil for the US, but the risk they run is that should a shooting situation occur, the Chinese will have a few million North Koreans crossing the Yellow River creating utter chaos.
I think it existed sometime between the end of World War II and that point in the 1970s when inflation jacked up the cost of living. During that era most households had only one wage earner, lived in decent housing and had a (historically) high disposable income.
Inflation hosed the cost of everything relative to income and from that point on you had trickle-down economics that cut taxes on the wealthy and capital gains, and low-cost computing enabled the rapid expansion of financial engineering and cost cutting which led to further large gains for the capital owning class and losses for those who became cut costs (cuts in salaries, benefits, etc).
I think the assumption is that manufacturing jobs had in many ways achieved "middle class" status by the late 1960s. They had pay that allowed a spouse to not work, health benefits, pensions and enabled the workers to own their own home and an automobile.
Most of the jobs you listed I would call "professional" jobs that either require post-secondary education (doctor, lawyer, professors) or substantial certifications (accountant, architect, financial managers, nurses).
A lot of those jobs (doctors, lawyers, etc) I've seen classified lately as HENRY -- High Earners, Not Rich Yet.
Ironically, a lot of the manufacturing jobs of "today" that I've been exposed to are very sophisticated, requiring high level computer skills in addition to a lot of knowledge on operating complex machinery as well as knowledge about what the machinery does (ie, welding, or metallurgy, etc).
At least to read the business section in the paper, they make it sound like these are the "future" of manufacturing and that people with these skills can produce greater volume and quality than the oft-cited overseas labor.