every dealing i ever had with NSI, was truely a pain, once i discovered the alternate registrars, i decided to check register.com... excellent, response time was great, i liked the idea that they parked the domain for me for nothing (the day NSI would do that is the day hell freezes probably), i recommend register.com myself.. very smooth, and i didn't have to fight with them over my pgp key (like i did with NSI), or my email changing, etc..
it's moments like this that i decided to drop NSI and register my current domain with one of the other registrars.. i.e. register.com and the like.. they atleast appear to have more than a clue than NSI does, unfortunately, people still use 'whois' to look up a domain, and since that only looks at NSI by default, well, makes life harder... but i'm not surprised that NSI would do something this dumb... i tried 6 times to get them just to change my CONTACT INFO, and oops.. sorry, we lost your pgp key, (and since i can't mail from the email in my contact info anymore.. too bad), thank god i don't hold any domains with them now..
after 30 runs of sum, _ALL_ checksums are the same 41865 10240 (My setup is an ASUS TXP4 with Maxtor 1.2 gig EIDE. True, it's not ultra DMA, but as you can see, it checks out fine here.
Yeah, Enjoy the lack of hardware supported currently. Yeah, BeOS is cool, i'm a developer, but, unless you're gonna do alot of media stuff, and only use hardware they _currently_ support, you're SOL.
Slashdot Mirror
after upgrading gcc and binutils earlier today...
:P )
all compiles fine... UNTIL it gets to the actual bzlinux crap... and it whines about no rule to make file X (which EXISTS DAMMIT)...
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `arch/i386/kernel/head.o', needed by `bvmlinux'. Stop.
anyone else run into this? (this didn't happen on test9 (my last 2.4 attempt, i was gonna try test11, till i found out about the gcc version issue
-ds
every dealing i ever had with NSI, was truely a pain, once i discovered the alternate registrars, i decided to check register.com... excellent, response time was great, i liked the idea that they parked the domain for me for nothing (the day NSI would do that is the day hell freezes probably), i recommend register.com myself.. very smooth, and i didn't have to fight with them over my pgp key (like i did with NSI), or my email changing, etc..
it's moments like this that i decided to drop NSI and register my current domain with one of the other registrars.. i.e. register.com and the like.. they atleast appear to have more than a clue than NSI does, unfortunately, people still use 'whois' to look up a domain, and since that only looks at NSI by default, well, makes life harder... but i'm not surprised that NSI would do something this dumb... i tried 6 times to get them just to change my CONTACT INFO, and oops.. sorry, we lost your pgp key, (and since i can't mail from the email in my contact info anymore.. too bad), thank god i don't hold any domains with them now..
I found it at: ftp.funet.fi/pub/gnu/funet
I did your test.. and my results follow:
10485760 Jan 18 22:00 bigfile
after 30 runs of sum, _ALL_ checksums are the same
41865 10240 (My setup is an ASUS TXP4 with Maxtor 1.2 gig EIDE.
True, it's not ultra DMA, but as you can see, it
checks out fine here.
Yeah, Enjoy the lack of hardware supported currently. Yeah, BeOS is cool, i'm a developer, but, unless you're gonna do alot of media stuff, and only use hardware they _currently_ support, you're SOL.