We're not going to have self driving in 5 years if they can't even freaking read signs at night yet! Further proof that automated driving is much further back then we are led to believe.
The good news about this is, maybe it's a sign that they weren't really scanning everyone's phone calls including critical business strategy conference meetings.
To me it is more important that Mary's child doesn't have to live their entire life in a society that has become violent because the average person doesn't get what they need.
I don't think it ever was about inflating the cost of a medallion, if that was the case they would lower the number of cars over time not raise it. The point is always to limit the number of cars to something that is not overburdening the roads and environment. OF course once you have something with value, people are going to want to protect it, that's just necessary evil.
At some point you have to call a spade a spade and look at how much opportunity the average low-income person really has to pull them selves out of the state they find themselves in. A person needs enough to live, so the less they make the more they have to work.
The poor get a means to sustain themselves for the purpose of working. You know this is how they do it in china. Give them just enough to live and they remain beholden to you.
I don't get it. I thought the leaders of these companies that basically had a license to print money at one time got there because they were dynamic thinkers and keen business people. Thay can't simply look at the world around them and adjust their business accordingly?? It's not like it's hard to go into a board meeting and tell them you know how to make more profits.
I don't think you really understand what socialism is. You're talking about communism, and not even real communism but the kind that has been implemented in real life. Socialism is merely the government taking an interest in the well being of its citizens over all else.
How many commenters have I seen here saying people are poor because they're not taking risk on starting a business and being successful. That requires debt!
Slashdot Mirror
It was his choice to attempt it now because if they don't then they can't design a budget to match.
We're not going to have self driving in 5 years if they can't even freaking read signs at night yet! Further proof that automated driving is much further back then we are led to believe.
*gasp* you forgot Uber in your item #2 that contains almost everything technical in the world.
We don't talk NEARLY enough about grabbing pussy.
They could at least reset the passwords of accounts that are known to have been obtained.
I have notea, want some?
The good news about this is, maybe it's a sign that they weren't really scanning everyone's phone calls including critical business strategy conference meetings.
To me it is more important that Mary's child doesn't have to live their entire life in a society that has become violent because the average person doesn't get what they need.
Taxi drivers with only a choice of three companies to run to instead of the hundreds of taxi companies we have now, but making 1/3 the money.
I don't think it ever was about inflating the cost of a medallion, if that was the case they would lower the number of cars over time not raise it. The point is always to limit the number of cars to something that is not overburdening the roads and environment. OF course once you have something with value, people are going to want to protect it, that's just necessary evil.
No matter how bad you make it sound, it's still better than where we are headed with Uber.
Do you not read the comments on here about people looking for jobs for months and not finding them? Holy fuck.
What equity do most impoverished people have??
And you don't think they need to be paid back at some point?
At some point you have to call a spade a spade and look at how much opportunity the average low-income person really has to pull them selves out of the state they find themselves in. A person needs enough to live, so the less they make the more they have to work.
Self reliance PRESUMES that there are opportunities to explore that you may rely upon.
The poor get a means to sustain themselves for the purpose of working. You know this is how they do it in china. Give them just enough to live and they remain beholden to you.
I don't get it. I thought the leaders of these companies that basically had a license to print money at one time got there because they were dynamic thinkers and keen business people. Thay can't simply look at the world around them and adjust their business accordingly?? It's not like it's hard to go into a board meeting and tell them you know how to make more profits.
I don't think you really understand what socialism is. You're talking about communism, and not even real communism but the kind that has been implemented in real life. Socialism is merely the government taking an interest in the well being of its citizens over all else.
Trump says the answer is military only.
How many commenters have I seen here saying people are poor because they're not taking risk on starting a business and being successful. That requires debt!
I'm glad you said it so I didn't have to write it all out.
Good thing it takes longer to work someone to death if you're paying them a little bit. Slavery is for suckers.
Clearly it is a business plan that needs a reboot in the days of mobile entertainment.
Except you can't use English words on some oses (redhat 7) and you can't make obvious substitutions like 1 for I and 0 for O.