Slashdot Mirror


18 To 24-Year-Olds Are Hitting the Big Screen at Lower Rates (fastcompany.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: For data and movie geeks, the MPAA's latest "Theatrical Market Statistics" report is a wealth of information about the health of the movie business. The big picture: 246 million people went to the movies in the United States and Canada last year, a 2% increase from the year before. But dig into the trends and things start to get a little more interesting. For instance, looking at per capita attendance broken down by age group shows 18- to 24-year-olds are hitting the big screen at lower rates than they were in 2012, although they saw an uptick last year.

226 comments

  1. 18 to 24 year-olds are broke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're broke that's why.

    Ticket prices keep going up with inflation, wages not so much.

    1. Re:18 to 24 year-olds are broke by DuckDodgers · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. Young adults can't afford the ticket prices. Going to a movie theater was always a luxury event, but for some kid working at a gas station or earning a few dollars in a college work study can't drop $13 just for two hours at a theater.

    2. Re:18 to 24 year-olds are broke by Moheeheeko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For the price of a ticket and a small bag of popcorn, you can wait 6 months, rent and or buy the same film, and watch the same film on your own home system, and without overpriced snacks and assholes who talk during the movie.

    3. Re:18 to 24 year-olds are broke by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was very young when Star Wars, but I vividly remember that it cost $2.25. Plugging the values into the Inflation Calculator, I get a value of $9.04 today. I saw Hidden Figures last month and paid $9.00 for a ticket.

      Minimum wage in 1977 was $2.31, or $9.29 inflation adjusted. Minimum wage as of January 1, 2017 - $10.00 Maybe movies just suck

    4. Re:18 to 24 year-olds are broke by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Plus you can throw the bag of popcorn away and enjoy the movie without the sickly sweet smell and rustling bag noises.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:18 to 24 year-olds are broke by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      Around me they're about $12-15 for a ticket, if I drive a bit to a more rural area they're $9-9.50

    6. Re:18 to 24 year-olds are broke by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      This was in Tacoma, so fairly large city in the Seattle metropolitan area. Not only that but I got recliner seating vs 1975 movie theater seating. That changeover occurred in the late 90's.

    7. Re:18 to 24 year-olds are broke by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Back then, kids had paper routes, nowadays adult drive them in cars.
      McDonald's jobs were not a job for full-fledged adults, kids worked at them and similarly worked mall jobs until they could find something solid or finished college. Real adults worked in manufacturing, higher ticket sales, engineering, etc. Nowadays real adults with real kids and real responsibilities are working the shit jobs so they don't have a lot of ability to help their offspring. Junior now might have to help the family make ends meet so that income is not as disposable as it once was. So they prioritize, movies just don't make the cut in a shitty world created for the benefit of the wealthy.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    8. Re:18 to 24 year-olds are broke by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Sure. For the same price I can watch it on a substandard screen with substandard sound on a less comfortable seat (remember movies are too expensive so imagine the shit state of my home entertainment system).

      As for arseholes, maybe you're generalising, or maybe you live in a really shit neighbourhood but people who talk during a movie typically get kicked out of the cinema where I live, and I've never seen it happen because people in general aren't arseholes.

    9. Re:18 to 24 year-olds are broke by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, I didn't have a paper route, but went around the neighborhood pulling a wagon and dragging a lawnmower mowing people's yard for $5 each. Now immigrants do the same job for $100 a week/yard. It's a hot and dirty job. but takes an hour or so.

    10. Re:18 to 24 year-olds are broke by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1

      When I say too expensive, I don't mean I'm too poor to go to them, I mean I know the value of my dollar and I'm not gonna spend 3x more to see a movie than I need to.

    11. Re:18 to 24 year-olds are broke by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Yeah, same effect. Kids jobs are now becoming adult jobs, that's because there are less real jobs to go around and the bottom of the job chain now looks attractive or at least is better than starving along with one's kids. It can all be laid at the feet of the retard actor ronald reagan, and every president since who didn't have the balls and sense to realize that trickle-down economics was an economist's fantasy with no bearing in reality. Then the free-trade bullshit economist pipe dream is what put our economy into a terminal descent.
      Germany didn't buy into that shit and kept its manufacturing and high quality jobs at home, along with protecting their environment.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    12. Re:18 to 24 year-olds are broke by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah for $10 you get a perfect screen, perfect sound, and great chairs. What shit value....

    13. Re:18 to 24 year-olds are broke by geekmux · · Score: 1

      They're broke that's why.

      Ticket prices keep going up with inflation, wages not so much.

      Ever wonder how much hipster coffee prices have gone up since the birth of Starbucks? Somehow they manage to afford that.

      Ever wonder how much they spend on those unlimited cell plans to feed social media addiction? They won't go without that.

      In the meantime, I can still get up early on Saturday and catch an opening-weekend movie at matinee prices for less than the cost of a single mochafuckachino latte with extra cream.

      Not saying the younger generation isn't struggling, but they certainly have other priorities when it comes to spending the money they do have.

    14. Re:18 to 24 year-olds are broke by Vince+Ferg · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing when I saw the article. Inflation or not there are much better things 18-24 year olds can find value in rather than going to the movies. On top of that is media really something youth values these days? I don't know about you but I can't keep up with any of it anymore, theres so much of it I could care less if I see the movie in theater and would rather just wait till later to catch it. I am in my 30's and I would say I used to go to the movies roughly 6 times a year 10 years ago, these days its more like 1-2 a year and that's only if its something incredible comes out. I have plenty at home to watch or catch up on so to me its definitely due to the market being oversaturated as well as ticket price. Supply and demand.

  2. Nothing to see here by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Clearly it is a business plan that needs a reboot in the days of mobile entertainment.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reboot
      Noun.
      Def. 1 -- To shut down and restart (a computer or program)
      Def 2 -- Abandon all hope ye who enter here.

      Definitely a definition two situation.

    2. Re:Nothing to see here by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. I thought the leaders of these companies that basically had a license to print money at one time got there because they were dynamic thinkers and keen business people. Thay can't simply look at the world around them and adjust their business accordingly?? It's not like it's hard to go into a board meeting and tell them you know how to make more profits.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  3. Why? by SlithyMagister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps if there was something worth watching...
    Something other than re-hashed comic books perhaps...

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Something other than re-hashed comic books perhaps..."

      They aren't "re-hashing" comic books, they are "hashing" them for the first time. Except maybe batman and superman. They've been hashed a few times since the 1930s and 1940s.

      It's only recently that special effects were at a level that would do justice to the story of super heroes.

      "Perhaps if there was something worth watching..."

      Yes -- there's a low signal to noise ratio but you can find some awesome gems. They usually appear under the radar. If you have an "independent movie" house nearby, see whats playing. Chef (2014) was a happy surprise. The Station Agent (2003), imo, was amazing. Captain Fantastic last year was another hidden Gem.

      Others worth spending time watching: Little Miss Sunshine, Sunshine Cleaning, The Full Monty, Waking Ned Divine, Bubba Hotep (that one was just fun).

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is that all those big budget movies are basically the same: light on story and characters and big on mindless action sequences.

      Winter Soldier, Guardians of the Galaxy, and The Force Awakens were all basically the same type of movie and were all awful.

    3. Re:Why? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if there was something worth watching...
      Something other than re-hashed comic books perhaps...

      Oh darling, check what's actually playing rather that getting your movie listings from the Marvel fan site.
      My local cinema chain is currently offering over 60 different movies in my city and the next one over this week alone. A single one is based on a comic book, Logan, and that was a damn good movie.

  4. nothing worth spending on by servo335 · · Score: 1

    Maybe the movies are not worth their time. One also cant forget that would require them to leave their house and silence / shut off their phones

    1. Re:nothing worth spending on by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      But they're "introverts", how can they go outside when it's so "draining" to them.

    2. Re:nothing worth spending on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks you have a poor understanding of introverts. But you nailed the stereotypical image of someone who falls into that personality-type bucket.

  5. three reasons: by nimbius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1. money. boomers spent a generation ruining any chance of a millenial or post millenials ability to buy anything more than a bus pass.
    2. Theaters. Exorbitant fees for tickets and concessions price most of them well outside the range of the 18-24 demographic. the ones that can afford it, generally avoid it and wait for the online/blu-ray. The theatre experience is sticky floors and 30 minutes of capitive audience advertisements for everything from car insurance to taco bell, and its an insult to anyone whos paid actual money to sit down and see a film.
    3. films.: six sequels to the fast and the furious? Ten remakes of Cinderella? thats not film, its the conceptual blueprint for purgatory. The average film experience is either waiting for the next release of 17 new and well planned Marvel movies, or enduring a wasteland of film targeted at the fifth grade comprehension level so as to maximize audience range. Pixar used to churn out a good film, but frankly theyre just in it for the toy licensing (Cars 3 anyone?)

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:three reasons: by khr · · Score: 1

      3. films.: six sequels to the fast and the furious?

      Man, I just saw a poster in the subway station for a seventh sequel to The Fast and the Furious.

    2. Re:three reasons: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fast and Furious 11: Nursing Home Wheelchair Races!

    3. Re:three reasons: by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1. money....Exorbitant fees for tickets and concessions price most of them well outside the range of the 18-24 demographic.

      And yet fueling up with a $7 mochafuckachino at the local hipster coffee shop every morning, along with a $100/month all-you-can-eat unlimited cellular plan, are well within the gotta-have-it budget for everyone in the 18-24 demographic.

      Funny how that shit excuse of "money" gets confused with priorities...

    4. Re:three reasons: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorta. Kinda.

      Waaaay back when, in the age of Broadcast Television, before the cable companies got together and forced the FCC to "improve" (read: eliminate) the over-the-air signal, your entertainment was pretty much limited to re-runs of whatever show was a "hit" four years ago and once-a-week showings of whatever the broadcasters thought was a hit at that time. Even cable was limited to a couple good shows here or there and lots and lots of second or third (or older) run movies. You could rent a movie on DVD but the selection was terrible. Movies in a theater were a legitimate alternative.
      Now, with broadcast television wiped out and cable ruling the airwaves and providing fantastic entertainment, movies aren't such a hot deal. Not to mention all the fun games out there. Who cares if you don't see Iron Man VII in the theater this month -- you can see it on VUDU or some other service in a little while. In the mean time there's plenty on cable and the internet and tons of games. Iron Man can wait.

      The problem is that the entertainment pie hasn't grown any larger, the slices just got thinner. If the slices get too thin there is no reason to have them. Theaters might go the way of Vaudeville or, like Vaudeville, morph into Broadway and bring us to places we can't imagine now. All spectacle all the time.

    5. Re:three reasons: by dwillden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No argument on the coffee, but likely they are riding on their parent's cell plan getting that unlimited data for $10-$15 bucks a month while Daddy pays the main fee.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    6. Re:three reasons: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you seriously saying that spending money on theater tickets and concessions should be a high priority?

      I mean, I can understand a comment like this in an article where kids are complaining they can't afford subway tickets so they have to jump turnstiles, but here? Really?

    7. Re:three reasons: by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      A large portion of the 18-24 demographic may be on their parents plan or split among multiple people lowering the average cost. And I don't think any of the major carriers charge $100 for their "unlimited" plan currently. I know I have 4 lines on Tmobile for $100 (+ taxes) and while not unlimited, with our home internet none of us go over the 3 or 3.5GB/month bucket.

      18-24 years ago the previous generation also probably had a $40 phone bill, $20+ internet bill for dialup, and $40+ cable bill...all replaced by that now <$100 cell phone bill.

    8. Re:three reasons: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F8: The Fate and the Furious looks good. One reason is due to the fact that I haven't seen any of the other movies. Also, I'm really tired and I don't want to think.

    9. Re:three reasons: by chispito · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. money. boomers spent a generation ruining any chance of a millenial or post millenials ability to buy anything more than a bus pass.

      This blame-Millennials, blame-Boomers crap is counterproductive and stupid. I'm sorry you had crappy parents but mine are great. And likewise with Millennials: I know a few starry-eyed 20-somethings myself and I hope they can learn from at least a few of my own mistakes.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    10. Re:three reasons: by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      Don't blame this boomer for their problems. My children are doing just fine -- good-paying jobs, nice houses, and new cars. Of course, they chose career paths and degrees that would result in good jobs, not some worthless degree that would lead nowhere.

      My son posts here on a regular basis. He can tell you the same thing.

    11. Re:three reasons: by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Pixar used to churn out a good film...

      That's because they used to be independent instead of being owned by Disney.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    12. Re:three reasons: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All completely offset by international sales- The US is now a secondary market really.

      Who gives a shit anyway. Production and distribution and advertising costs are way down. Finding good cinema is easy. Fuck. For once in recent history finding good old cinema is easy.

      https://www.criterion.com/

      There are thousands of amazing, thought provoking, iconic pieces made 30-50 years ago you've never seen that are ready to be explored. There's a bustling industry of people digging up old filmstock, giving it a clean-up, then releasing it on blu ray. You get to see some wonderful films at a quality that's never been seen after their theatrical release decades previous.

      4:3 aspect, broadcast quality PAL/NTSC really does not do these films justice. Getting VHS to spit out any real quality required a player costing 2-4K in 1980s dollars and early telecine transfers were often terrible. And expensive.

    13. Re:three reasons: by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      No argument on the coffee, but likely they are riding on their parent's cell plan getting that unlimited data for $10-$15 bucks a month while Daddy pays the main fee.

      My parents paid for my voice-only cellphone for ten years. The catch was to call my mother every day since my older brother couldn't be bothered. Those calls weren't easy when she was drunk and bitching about my brother, and quite painful in the weeks before she died from breast cancer. After she passed away, the cellphone got transferred into my name and I only had to call my father five days a week for eight years until six weeks before he passed away from throat cancer.

    14. Re:three reasons: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I actually enjoyed the Fast and Furious sequels. They are unashamedly dumb action movies, but well made and self-aware enough to be funny and exciting.

      Much more enjoyable watching them at home though.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:three reasons: by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      You could rent a movie on VHS. Were you actually there? DVD weren't popular until after 2000. I got a PS2 specifically to watch movies and DVD selection lagged VHS for a while even then. The divx wars were ongoing and people were fence sitting.

    16. Re:three reasons: by painandgreed · · Score: 2

      Don't blame this boomer for their problems. My children are doing just fine -- good-paying jobs, nice houses, and new cars. Of course, they chose career paths and degrees that would result in good jobs, not some worthless degree that would lead nowhere. My son posts here on a regular basis. He can tell you the same thing.

      Hey, that's great and resembles me and my father, however, it's just a case of selection bias. My father says things like you did but only because his company didn't outsource his department till he hit retirement age unlike the other competing companies. He has this conflicting dialogs of "only dead wood ever get laid off and real workers will have careers" along with "I was lucky my company didn't outsource or I would have had to find a new job at an old age for less money and be forced to relocate to take it". If you really want to find anything out, you can't just look at one set of data, you need to actually to look at impartial studies and see what they actually say.

    17. Re:three reasons: by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      I guess maybe it is different since I'm near a big city, but you seriously don't have broadcast PBS, NBC, CBS, ABC, and FOX? We probably have 50 broadcast channels if you could the little subchannels showing old movies and Spanish stuff.

    18. Re:three reasons: by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      Not the OP, but I don't think that's what was meant... it was more a statement of the fact that if somebody has the money to pay $5 for a coffee or $100 a month for a cell phone plan, then they aren't foregoing the theatre because they can't afford it. Rather, they are choosing to spend money on coffee and cell phone plans instead.

    19. Re:three reasons: by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      I've lived a few places where I could pick up at the most 3 over the air signals. One time I got two CBS stations!

    20. Re:three reasons: by chispito · · Score: 1

      A large portion of the 18-24 demographic may be on their parents plan or split among multiple people lowering the average cost. And I don't think any of the major carriers charge $100 for their "unlimited" plan currently. I know I have 4 lines on Tmobile for $100 (+ taxes) and while not unlimited, with our home internet none of us go over the 3 or 3.5GB/month bucket.

      18-24 years ago the previous generation also probably had a $40 phone bill, $20+ internet bill for dialup, and $40+ cable bill...all replaced by that now <$100 cell phone bill.

      The plans are only cheaper now because the phones are purchased a la carte (as they should be).

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    21. Re:three reasons: by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Yup! Mine is riding on my cell plan and I don't mind. It costs me $33 a month. NBD

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    22. Re:three reasons: by losfromla · · Score: 1

      That is a high price to pay for having someone pay for your cellphone. Are you homeless or in some other way destitute?

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    23. Re:three reasons: by losfromla · · Score: 1

      I don't think cable rules shit. Last time I got it, I deeply regretted it and as soon as my three month trial was over, I disconnected it and returned their stupid box. Cable is filled with idiotic fringe channels like HomeShoppingNetwork 1-15, those were seriously 15 channels of my package, the movie channels repeat the same movies over and over, and they show commercials (wtf?). I noticed that after a couple of weeks of trying to use cable I was only using Netflix, so cancelled cable as soon as practical.

      So, fuck cable! Until they get rid of the shit channels, commercials, and channel bundling, I'll continue to not subscribe to their services. Now they're trying to bundle in phone service, as if that mattered to a household with 5 cell-phones, and in general, one cell-phone minimum per human over 9 years old.

      The cable companies need to realize that they have jumped the shark and exist merely to provide us a fast, cheap, highly available internet connection.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    24. Re:three reasons: by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That is a high price to pay for having someone pay for your cellphone.

      Family.

      Are you homeless or in some other way destitute?

      Nope. I was a late baby. I went off to college the same time my parents retired and moved away. Empty nest syndrome hit my mother hard.

    25. Re:three reasons: by losfromla · · Score: 1

      The problem is not so much learning from your mistakes, it is having to pay for your generation's mistakes on trade (the free trade stupidity), economics (who's the moron that thought trickle down would benefit the masses?), the environment (degradation and consumption of natural resources) that are the problem.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    26. Re:three reasons: by losfromla · · Score: 1

      thanks!

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    27. Re:three reasons: by losfromla · · Score: 1

      They're great if you don't have the slightest intuition about the laws of physics.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    28. Re:three reasons: by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Exorbitant fees for tickets and concessions price most of them well outside the range of the 18-24 demographic.

      I just spent $13 to see John Wick 2 (good movie by the way). I paid $3 to upgrade to a comfort seat.

      The 18-24 demographic have no problem downing $10 worth of alcohol in 20min at a pub, not to mention over priced whateverthehell that thing they serve at starbucks is (I dare not call it coffee). Ticket prices are not their concern.

    29. Re:three reasons: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The new one looks awesome. The Rock wrestles a torpedo.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    30. Re:three reasons: by chispito · · Score: 1

      Pixar used to churn out a good film...

      That's because they used to be independent instead of being owned by Disney.

      Yeah but if Disney didn't buy Pixar, we'd never have Wreck it Ralph or Big Hero 6. Disney Animation Studios films are nearly indistinguishable from Pixar in quality since the acquisition.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    31. Re:three reasons: by losfromla · · Score: 1

      ...yeah...
      I guess that's good for the ladies as his shirt probably comes off inadvertently during the fight.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    32. Re:three reasons: by sheramil · · Score: 1
      It says something about the modern cinema experience that many people get more out of a cup of coffee.

      Asimov was right.

    33. Re:three reasons: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      In the last one The Rock is in hospital with a broken arm. He sees a far off explosion out the window, and thinks "I've got to get in on that!"

      He stands up, flexes his muscles to shatter the cast off his arm, takes a couple of aspirin for the pain, commandeers an ambulance, and drives it off a bridge onto a drone that is just emerging from the tunnel below. He then gets out of the wrecked ambulance, rips the minigun off the drone and starts shooting up the bad guys.

      Fucking awesome.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    34. Re:three reasons: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. After paying for that, they have no money left for crappy movies.

    35. Re:three reasons: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Every generation gets that. Of course, only the latest generation has shown evidence that they are unable to hack it.

  6. The way of the Dodo by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

    Movie theaters are going to become the next video rental shops, as in they are going to die a slow and noisy death.
    With home theater systems getting cheaper and better and better every day, it's practically inevitable.
    They may not fade away completely (just yet at least) but location and pricing is going to become paramount, just like books shops are now.
    I mean, I still browse through the occasional book shop, but I can't remember the last time I bought a physical book. Erm, nevermind, just remembered, the last couple books of Wheel of Time to finish off my collection, although I read the book on my kindle anyways, I wanted to finish off the series on my book shelf.

    --
    There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    1. Re:The way of the Dodo by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      The average theater is going to not make it. However, chains like the Alamo Drafthouse are still making money hand over fist, just because they offer not just a baby-free, cellphone-free, and chatter-free experience, but decent food and suds.

      Theater chains like AMC may still be around for entertaining kids or whatnot, and they will still have a spot, but their market share will definitely shrink. The days of grabbing a XL Coke and popcorn and considering that as decent food are gone.

    2. Re:The way of the Dodo by l20502 · · Score: 1

      Filling a bookshelf still provides more value than seeing most recent movies.

    3. Re:The way of the Dodo by Binestar · · Score: 2

      Regal in my area is adapting quite well aiming for the older crowd. They've changed their seating out for reclinable seats. You can order your ticket online and reserve your seat, so no fighting in line to get the best seats, just order online a week in advance and you're guaranteed your spot. The Seats are huge. https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.... https://s3-media1.fl.yelpcdn.c...

      A bit more expensive than I would like, but for the few times I go see the movies I'm okay paying ~$9.50 on a matinee ticket and ~$15 on 3D ticket when I know I'll be comfortable.

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    4. Re:The way of the Dodo by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      A lot of theaters around here have changed. They aren't the old 90's movies theaters any more (yay!). They serve restaurant quality food, have the "dial-a-soda" machines so you can get your half cherry diet something half orange diet something if you want. The theaters have reclining sofa-ish leather chairs arranged in pairs. The food is brought to you in the theater, and you book your seat at the time you purchase your tickets.

      This really solves most of my complaints about going to the local theater. No long lines -- EVER. Walk straight from the parking lot to my seat in the theater (ok, well, stop to order food, scan my phone/cc to get the tickets), then walk to theater. Comfy seats actually better than what I have at home (Yeah, I need to replace my sofa), and food that is quite good and neither me or my wife have to do the dishes afterwards. Now the only complaint is the price, but it's one I'm willing to pay for a good movie experience. The theaters are smaller, but the screen size hasn't shrunk by as much (the screens are practically wall to wall. I think the theater owners (AMC) have done a pretty good job of listening.

    5. Re:The way of the Dodo by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      This has been predicted for the last twenty years

    6. Re:The way of the Dodo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your date with mom went poorly?

    7. Re:The way of the Dodo by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Youâ(TM)re quite right about the Alamo. Ever since they opened a location in my city, itâ(TM)s the only one I goto. No babies, no phones, and ZOMG, those boozy milkshakesâ¦

      Even so though; the GP is right in that thereâ(TM)s progressively less reason to goto a theater anymore. My TV and stereo are good enough⦠and Iâ(TM)ve learned to replicate enough of the boozy milkshakes⦠that it really takes a highly visual movie that makes full use of the big screen to get me even to the Alamo. Basically, unless Jedi Knights, the USS Enterprise, Iron Man, or Groot are on that screen; Iâ(TM)m waiting for Netflix or Blu Ray.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
  7. Trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Movies are garbage and kids want to spend their money more efficiently on things they actually derive value from (games / streaming / ... pizza)

    You can tell Hollywood is grasping for that demo by playing off things that marketing teams see as what "the kidz" are into (gender politics, feminism, PoC, whatever else) this has lead to some amusingly bad cinematic misfires and will likely continue until not even the flimsiest tax scheme will turn a profit

    Don't get me wrong, we always had sludge at the theatre, now we have sludge being peddled to people who don't want to spend money to see it, and that's something Hollywood needs to figure out on its own

  8. Too expensive and not clean by pablo_max · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The last few times that I went to the cinema, I was very disappointment with the experience.

    The last thing I saw was in 3D, so I had to pay an additional 5 bucks. So, 40 bucks for two people. Then 5 bucks for the "small" 200 ounce soda and another 5 bucks for a "small" dumpster full of popcorn.
    Then you sit down in the grungy seat and watch the movie. Then notice that the audio is not really calibrated all that well.
    Then the movie is over and you try to pry your shoes from the soda glue all over the floor. Maybe you even use the bathroom with the pervasive urine smell and racist comments carved into the doors.

    Yeah... Hard to imagine that attendance is down.

    1. Re:Too expensive and not clean by David_Hart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The last few times that I went to the cinema, I was very disappointment with the experience.

      The last thing I saw was in 3D, so I had to pay an additional 5 bucks. So, 40 bucks for two people. Then 5 bucks for the "small" 200 ounce soda and another 5 bucks for a "small" dumpster full of popcorn.
      Then you sit down in the grungy seat and watch the movie. Then notice that the audio is not really calibrated all that well.
      Then the movie is over and you try to pry your shoes from the soda glue all over the floor. Maybe you even use the bathroom with the pervasive urine smell and racist comments carved into the doors.

      Yeah... Hard to imagine that attendance is down.

      My local theater became a Showcase de Lux with leather electronic recliner seating, etc. Yes, you pay a bit more for the ticket but the experience is completely different from the old sticky seat days on cheap night... That being said, the vast majority of movies on Bluray 4K look and sound just as good on my 65" UHD 4K TV and Denon Dobly Surround system as they do on the big screen and my fridge is a whole lot closer.

        I do still go to the movies, but I'm picky about which I see on the big screen. The last was John Wick 2. The next one I will watch in the Theater is Ghost in the Shell.

    2. Re:Too expensive and not clean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only reason I go is because for some reason the wife claims to enjoy the experience. I just don't get it. Every damn time she gets sick from eating the gross popcorn, can't seem to find the perfect seat, complains that nothing good is actually playing, prices are high, rude people... yet she is trying to drag me down there any chance she gets.

    3. Re:Too expensive and not clean by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Cool story. I just saw John Wick. Perfect screen, perfect sound. Admittedly I didn't buy popcorn, so I can't comment on the price but I did pay $13 for the fancy reclining seat, though the $10 seats are quite comfrotable and clean.

      Maybe you should go to a different cinema.

    4. Re:Too expensive and not clean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of trashy place do you live in?

  9. Not surprised, there isn't a reason anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised, I'm out of the age group (33) but the same applies to most people I know in my age range too. 5-20 years ago TVs at home were small, with picture and sound quality that in pretty much every case was a whole lot worse than your average movie theater. So going out to see a movie made sense. Great picture, great sound, it took forever to get a DVD (or VHS) and even when you did it was going to be on a tiny screen with horrible sound.

    These days it's totally different. Many people have large TVs at home (the wife and I each have our own 65 inch TV) both of which are hooked up to a good quality surround sound system and a PS4. Neither of these setups were expensive. The TVs and surround sound systems were bought refurbished for great deals.

    So we can sit in the peace and comfort of our own home and watch a Blu-Ray 3-4 months after the movie comes out on our own good quality home theater setups.

    So combine the rise of better quality home setups for affordable prices, with all the annoyingness of going to see a movie. (Like when my wife and I went to the Midnight showing of Ep 7 and there were more than one crying babies in the theatre). Factor in the price of tickets vs the cost of buying the Blu-Ray (these days, 2 tickets are often as much or more than the Blu-Ray) and it becomes a no brainer.

  10. Off-topic Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is off-topic

  11. Closing, too by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    Two of the 'beer and restaurant' type movie theatres here have gone bust. I was disappointed... we don't make it out too often, but the kids always enjoy it. Used to go almost once a week back when I was a younger fellow without responsibilities or obligations. Home with streaming or red box has become much more convenient if you don't mind the wait, though.

  12. NEWSFLASH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    18-24 year-olds are not fully mature adults. They are mercurial and still discovering what they like and don't like. NEWSFLASH #2: they will not be 18-24 year-olds forever. Why has the normal human process of maturation become headline-worthy? So glad we have Teen Beat, er, *Slashdot*, to keep us up to speed on all of the exciting ways kids are behaving like all the other kids that have ever existed, ever.

    1. Re:NEWSFLASH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      besides, they LIKE watching video on tiny screens. duh.

  13. Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Your irrelevant rhetoric aside, the reality is that the economic aspects are just a small part of the bigger picture.

    These people we're talking about are the early members of Generation Z - the generation that comes after the Millennials (formerly called Generation Y).

    While Millennials are known to lean very far to the political and social left, with a fascination about things like "social justice" and "progressiveness", Generation Z is showing the opposite tendencies: they lean very heavily to the political and social right.

    This isn't surprising. These people have grown up in a post-9/11 and Great Recession (which is still ongoing, thanks to the last 8 years of failed economic policies) world that's much bleaker and more realistic than the positive times of the 1990s that Millennials grew up in. They aren't as naive and idealistic as Millennials so often are. They see through the nonsense of the "social justice" narrative. They're much more aware of economic realities. They judge others based on achievement and ability, not their skin color or religion or gender confusion like Millennials do.

    So of course Generation Z won't bother going to see mainstream movies. Why would they want to? Most movies these days push Millennial-friendly "social justice" narratives. We see this very clearly with movies that were successful years ago that have been remade solely so that the new cast could consist only of "disadvantaged minorities". There have also been movies that essentially try to rewrite history, to exaggerate the achievements of people deemed to be "disadvantaged" today.

    The members of Generation Z aren't stupid. While Millennials may lap up that sort of crap with glee, Generation Z doesn't. They see through the nonsense. They want no part of it. Yes, it's true that they don't have much money. So they sure aren't going to spend it on awful movies that are quasi-propaganda. Even if they did have the money, they would find something more useful to spend it on that subjecting themselves to leftist nonsense projected on a large screen.

    1. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know a single gen Z that is conservative, not a single one, and I live in the middle of the red-state midwest.

    2. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think of Gen Z as millennials, not Gen Y

    3. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by dryriver · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Excuse me for interrupting your "Leftist Hollywood Sucks Bad And Gen Z Rejects It" propaganda broadcast, but precisely WHAT is wrong with films having a "Social Justice" or "Social/Societal Progress" message woven into the narrative? Would you prefer films where all sorts of injustices happen, and those injustices are not corrected by a protagonist or an outraged society or a government? Films where people suffer racism, abuse, discrimination, violence and other injustices, and nobody does anything about it? I would also like you to explain to me what a "Social Justice Warrior" is, since I hear that term thrown around by righties here all the time, even though you haven't used it in your post. Somebody who sees injustice and speaks out or fights against it is a SJW? And that's a "bad thing thing to be" that Generation Z sees right through and won't let happen anymore? Is this your worldview? Do you dream of a world where a "very different" right-leaning Gen Z rejects "social justice" and "being progressive" as "just evil propaganda" and turns into a kind of Hitler-Youth where "might is right" and where if you are mistreated "that's your problem, not society's problem"?

      --
      Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
    4. Re: Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X: 60-80
      Y: 80-00 (Millennials)
      Z: 00-20

    5. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by KingMotley · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not the original poster, but social justice warrior is someone who takes a look at something and defines it in terms of social injustice, almost always without looking at it very deeply, and feels the compulsion to fix that injustice no matter the cost.

      For example:
      A company has 5 entry level workers, we'll call them A,B,C,D,and E. A (male with 10 years experience, and the best worker) gets paid $15/hr, B and C (one male one female each with 8 years experience) $14 and hour, D (3 years experience) is paid $13 and hour, and E (15 years experience, but mentally retarded) is paid $10 an hour. The SJW boss comes in and "fixes" the social injustice (C was female and should be paid equal pay, D was discriminated by age or whatever the latest fad is, E should be paid just as much because they have the same job regardless of productivity) by taking the average $13.20. Feeling awesome at fixing this social injustice he goes and celebrates. 2 weeks later, employee A leaves the company because a competitor gave him a raise to $20 an hour as he was been grossly underpaid given his skills. A couple weeks after being overworked, employees B & C leave the company because they can't keep up with the workload now that A has left, and they can't perform at the level he was. The company is now left with one employee who is just out of college has no industry experience and continues to make mistakes that A, B, or C never would have. The company while trying to find replacements for A, B and C can't find any except new college graduates. Product quality suffers, quantity production is in the toilet, and a month later the company goes bankrupt. Employee D loaded with college debt, takes the first job he finds at $12 an hour, and Employee E is out of work, back on social programs, and lives the life as a hermit in their 10'x10' apartment.

      SJW moves on to the next company, touting how awesome of a job he did at his previous employer right before they went out of business.

      Right, wrong, or indifferent, that is what a SJW is -- looking for social injustices, finding them where they don't really exist, and fighting to get the fixed, no matter the cost or if they should be.

    6. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From what I know about Rightists and Alt-Rightists this is their view on Social Justice and SJW:
      "Social Justice" is a set of petty, morally bankrupt and often contradictory ideas presented as a justice that all people should follow and believe. Like giving certain groups of people more rights than others for the sake of correcting discrimination, in their view that is unfair and just another form of discrimination.
      "Social Justice Warrior" is a person indoctrinated by this ideology and who fights to spread it.

      Also, I would like to say something that is my own opinion: avoid accusing or implying a group of people have a connection or agree with Adolf Hitler's ideas, even if not totally unfounded. I say it because:
      -It generally doesn't bring them or others to agree with you if they don't already
      -it is a problematic tactic that can make you look desperate and/or aggressive
      -You might force the other side of the argument to be completely hostile to you, turning a discussion into a fight when that could be avoided by exerting moderation.

    7. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Great Recession (which is still ongoing, thanks to the last 8 years of failed economic policies)"

      where are you getting this from? The recession ended years ago (going by the actual definition of recession, not Fox News definition which is essentially any time a democrat is in office there is a recession). The economic policies have NOT failed just because recovery isn't as fast as people want (indeed, US recovery has been more robust than most other countries).Things aren't perfect yet, but they have been increasing steadily over the last 8 years.

    8. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      Considering most Gen-Zers are 10 years old, I don't think you're correct.

    9. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm down, buddy. Are you only capable of thinking at the extremes of everything? Are you only capable of communicating using hyperbole?

      The problem with "social justice" is that it's completely lacking in anything resembling justice. In fact, it's the embodiment of the problems that you're clearly against: racism, intolerance, prejudice, sexism, and so on, and so forth.

      Instead of letting traits like race, gender, sexual preference, and so on fade into the background, "social justice" is the practice of putting them front and center, and forcefully letting everybody know they're doing it intentionally.

      The problem we're talking about here is that we have remakes of older movies with long-standing characters who intentionally have traits like their skin color, their gender, their sexual preference, and so on changed for no reason other than so that leftists can force-feed this false sense of "diversity" to the audience.

      Face it, the political center and the political right have moved past these issues. We don't care what race somebody is. We don't care what religion they practice. We don't care what gender they think they are.

      The political left, on the other hand, is utterly obsessed with this stuff. They can't just accept that people have differences. No, they need to go out of their way to point out these differences continually, and worse, try to impose some sort of faux "balance" on society as a whole.

      Even the people that the leftists think they are bringing "justice" to have had enough of this nonsense! These people just want to live their lives in peace, without leftists trying to continually focus on some minor trait of theirs.

    10. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by k6mfw · · Score: 2

      Old guy here, I rarely go to movie theaters because most films don't interest me (last film I saw was Hidden Figures, before it was The Aviator), it is a PITA to get to the theater (even on weekends driving in Silicon Valley with so many stoplights and heavy traffic), and it seems I have so many other activities that taking 3 to 4 hours to go watch a movie is a good chunk of time. It probably is same for many other generations, it seems theaters are not as packed as it was years ago (back in the days large parking lots were full and huge long lines for tickets). So while everyone argues political reasons, what another offtopic discussion such as "Hollywood Accounting?" You know where there are huge gross revenues, actors making millions, and Hollywood says they are losing big money due to piracy or various movies didn't make much profits (i.e. Harry Potter).

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    11. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but precisely WHAT is wrong with films having a "Social Justice" or "Social/Societal Progress" message woven into the narrative?

      The same thing thats wrong with Disney films. Unrealistic. Promotes unsustainable ideals. Imbuing the young with ideas like "if I scream loud enough, the world will be cured of its ills" is exactly the wrong thing to do, to wit: millenials.

    12. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by dryriver · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Have you considered that Mainstream movies - which are watched around the world - have a big impact on people who don't read or think much, or don't have a good education, or have been indoctrinated into holding socially destructive views? I have an education that steered me away from engaging in racism, intolerance, prejudice and so forth from a very young age. But there still is a shitload of racism, intolerance, prejudice, sexism and other nastiness in the world. Hundreds of thousands of people in different countries and communities around the world encounter it every day. THAT is what the "social justice" message in movies is all about. You are showing people who actively engage in injustice loud and clear that injustice isn't something good or tolerable. And you are sending a message to victims of injustice that they are not alone, that injustice can be fought if you stand up to it and fight it. I see nothing wrong with such a message. What I DO see as wrong is arguing that these themes should be removed from the movies - that the problems addressed will simply "fade away by themselves" if nobody talks about them or makes films about them. Problems don't "go away" if you stop talking about them or pretend they don't exist. In fact, injustice would quickly become "normalized" if you didn't address it in films, on television, in books and journalism. Anybody could do whatever they want to another person, and nobody would make films or TV programs about it, or report on it anymore. That isn't the kind of world I want to live in.

      --
      Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
    13. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by dryriver · · Score: 2

      "Promotes unsustainable ideals" you say. I see... So if a blatant injustice happens to someone, they shouldn't "scream out loud" or expect that injustice to be redressed in any way, because that would be "unsustainable ideals" at work. May I ask: Precisely WHAT are the ideals you hold dear, and how are THEY sustainable, while other ideals are not?

      --
      Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
    14. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by mrun4982 · · Score: 1

      LOL. Let's see some data to back that up.

    15. Re: Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      X: 60-80
      Y: 80-00 (Millennials)
      Z: 00-20

      Man I pity those that will come after Z,

    16. Re: Generation Z leans to the political right. by fubarrr · · Score: 1

      Are you Chinese?

    17. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHAT is wrong with films having a "Social Justice" or "Social/Societal Progress" message woven into the narrative?

      I paid for entertainment. Save the sermon for your congregation.

    18. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if a blatant injustice happens to someone, they shouldn't "scream out loud" or expect that injustice to be redressed in any way, because that would be "unsustainable ideals" at work.

      Here you've changed the subject to justice. The topic is social justice, which is similar to justice in that they both contain the string "justice".

    19. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I should've clarified it better on the beginning, but I'm not the one you were initially replying to. Sorry, I'm just another Anonymous Coward, not the first one who started complaining about "leftist propaganda" on movies.

      I don't agree with him, in my opinion the reason young people are watching less movies is because they are just not that fun right now, especially with all the endless sequels.

    20. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great Recession (which is still ongoing, thanks to the last 8 years of failed economic policies)

      oh please... just stop.

    21. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by lgw · · Score: 1

      I don't know a single gen Z that is conservative, not a single one, and I live in the middle of the red-state midwest.

      It's quite rare for kids to be conservative. Rarer now that schools have become progressive indoctrination facilities. People tend to become conservative around 30, once they have a job, a family, a mortgage, and generally become stakeholders in the country.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I flipped around 28 or 29 from conservative to liberal. I'm 37 now.

    23. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      how about try to fucking make them entertaining first, and THEN worry about propagandizing (or in less overt terms, having a 'message')?

    24. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Social justice does not exist it is just about shaming and virtue signaling.
      You cannot improve on the word "Justice" by adding the word social and how long does a stupid idea have to fail before you give up on it?

    25. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great writeup.

          Reminds me of a "new world map" being introduced to "de-colonize" the presentation of landmasses that have been previously shown as shrunken / diminutizing / and demeaning of larger but poorer continents. Apparently the standard Mercator projection map is one of the most insidious examples of perpetuating racism.

      https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/03/16/north-america-really-bigger-than-africa-this-map-sets-things-straight/lK52K7aKYFpQ3b8ujJj6LP/story.html

      FTA:
      The map exchange is part of the district’s effort to “decolonize the curriculum” within the next three years. “Most of the early world map projections that lasted were created by North Europeans,” Domingo said. “And so, their perspective was from the northern hemispheric perspective, but a Colonial perspective as well.”

    26. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > I would also like you to explain to me what a "Social Justice Warrior" is

      Replace the words with:

      Stupid
      Juvenile
      Whiner

      and you'll start to understand it what it means.

      SJW is (typically) a dumb Gen Z with a pet peeve over some perceived bullshit "injustice" -- basically anything that doesn't agree with THEIR myopic philosophy. Now instead of actually _doing_ something AFTER careful analysis of BOTH sides of the issue, because issues are almost never black and white, they would rather have a knee-jerk reaction and whine about it instead.

      For more information see the book:

      SJWs Always Lie: Taking Down the Thought Police

      There is no reasoning with these irrational people. They believe their POV (point-of-view) is the ONLY right one and blindly ignore facts. The classic attack is the ad hominem using labels as misogynist, trigger, microagression, etc. They are so insecure with their immaturity that they have to attack everyone else who doesn't agree with them. It is the ultimate Political Censorship gone wrong.

      South Park poked fun of their stupidity in Season 19 by calling them Pussy Crushers

      * Truth and Advertising
      * PC Principal or DailyMotion

      The only valid tactic is to ignore these whiney cunts -- because they make the classic Internet Trolls look like Saints in comparison -- otherwise you are just wasting your time.

      You can fix ignorant.
      You can't fix Stupid (Juvenile Whiners.)

    27. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      The only reason to flip is if you have greed combined with stupidity; the right doesn't do anything for the middle-class and if you were rich you'd probably be right-wing from birth.

    28. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by nobuddy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My Presidential vote history:
      Reagan, Bush, Perot, Dole, Bush, Kerry, Obama, Obama, (Sanders) well, fine. Clinton. Since I have no choice. Dammit. At least its not Trump.

      Your affiliation may change as you learn more. Which way it goes depends on how you feel about what you learned. Conservatives used to be about being fiscal conservatives and small government, hands off on the rest. Now they are about social conservative and HUGE government. They say small government, but their vote history is always HUUUUUUGE military and corporate control and the rest gutted to make the military even more HUUUUGE and corporate control more profitable. Fuck that, I am no fascist. Time to reign this runaway horse back toward the middle, and maybe a little left of there.

    29. Re: Generation Z leans to the political right. by nobuddy · · Score: 1

      Gen

    30. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by nobuddy · · Score: 1

      If you think Harry Potter didn't make much profits, then you clearly have not even tried to look at the data. At all. Just, wow.

      That series has profited $6.5 Billion. Profited. Not grossed. Net.
      And that is just from box office sales. Video releases and merchandising profited another $25 Billion. Profit. Not gross. Net.

      Hell, you could not be more wrong if you tried, with that example.

              Harry Potter and The Sorcerer's Stone
              Budget: $125 million
              Worldwide box office earnings: $974.6 million
              Profit: $849.6 million

      Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
              Budget: $100 million
              Worldwide box office earnings: $879 million
              Profit: $779 million

      Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
              Budget: $130 million
              Worldwide box office earnings: $796.7 million
              Profit: $666.7 million

      Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
              Budget: $150 million
              Worldwide box office earnings: $896.1 million
              Profit: $746.1 million

      Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
              Budget: $150 million
              Worldwide box office earnings: $942.9 million
              Profit: $792.9 million

      Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
              Budget: $250 million
              Worldwide box office profit: $935 million
              Profit: $685 million

      Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I
              Budget: $125 million
              Worldwide box office earnings: $960.3 million
              Profit: $835.3 million

      Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part II
              Budget: $125 million
              Worldwide box office earnings: $1.3 billion
              Profit: $1.16 billion

    31. Re: Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont think this is a generational thing and i think you do not understand the y.

    32. Re: Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well said

    33. Re: Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does not justice start with social change with social issues. that said some sjw go way over board and as others have pointed out may not be for the right reasons or outcomes to even just trolling.

    34. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first time my father ever voted for a non-republican for president was Obama's second term, and he was just under 60 at the time. He voted for Hillary and the democrat candidate for governor; neither one, but I'm proud of him.

    35. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by lgw · · Score: 1

      You should have prefaced that comment with your age. Also "conservative" and the party you vote for are different things.

      The oldquote is "If you're under 30 and conservative, you have no heart. If you're over 30 and liberal you have no money."

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    36. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      You should have prefaced that comment with your age. Also "conservative" and the party you vote for are different things.

      Way way older than 30, and make a decent living (enough that I pay 37% tax at the top end, plus sales tax on what I do get to keep) I just don't feel the need to own everything in the world to be happy.

      The oldquote is "If you're under 30 and conservative, you have no heart. If you're over 30 and liberal you have no money."

      Quotes are awesome, though I prefer: "The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."

    37. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by lgw · · Score: 1

      I just don't feel the need to own everything in the world to be happy.

      How's your retirement savings going? How would if be if the government took it on a whim? That's the ehart of conservatism in America - a government without the power to fuck you.

      the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness

      Conservatives give more to charity, and all of progressivism is the search for moral superiority. But I bet that quote was from the 80s (or before), the era of televangelists, before the parties swapped the role of moral scold.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    38. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      How's your retirement savings going? How would if be if the government took it on a whim? That's the ehart of conservatism in America - a government without the power to fuck you.

      That's just bullshit.

      Conservatives give more to charity, and all of progressivism is the search for moral superiority.

      So is that.

      But I bet that quote was from the 80s (or before), the era of televangelists, before the parties swapped the role of moral scold.

      My quote is from 2002, yours is from 1875 (http://quoteinvestigator.com/2014/02/24/heart-head/)

      We're done here.

    39. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My presidential vote history:

      None of the above, ever.

      Get someone worthy of being president and then I'll participate in their little childish political/power grab games. Since that is unlikely to ever happen, I expatriated many years ago and will probably never go back to the USA, not that I would ever want to.

    40. Re: Generation Z leans to the political right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ã... 20-40
      Ã 40-60
      Ã- 60-80

      I pity those who have only A-Z.

    41. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You know there's a solution to that, right, you limp-wristed pansy leftist piece of shit?

      There is, but you're not going to like it. It entails you discovering that leftists own guns too.

      I predict that if we actually do get carry reciprocity, your kind is going to make this discovery in a most unpleasant fashion.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    42. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Ayanami_R · · Score: 1

      "That's the ehart of conservatism in America - a government without the power to fuck you."

      Care to explain the browser history vote yesterday then?

      Both parties are just using their members to keep most of the country distracted while they work with business to extract wealth that was stolen from the workers that created it.

      --
      "Science is the power of man"
    43. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by camazotz · · Score: 1

      Living through aphorisms is not a good idea, though. It takes more heart and character to be over 30 and have money and realize the significance and responsibility you have to your community than it does to be over thirty, with money, and wallow in selfishness. I'm 46, have plenty of money, and a strong determination to focus on overall community improvement for the betterment of my family, and the left is the path to that achievement. But when I was 20 and poor? I was a deluded libertarian. It helped being a libertarian when I had no money, as it did for so many others I knew back then like myself, because the philosophy told you that you had more control over your own life (or wanted it) and that made young libertarians feel more righteously indignant every time you had to pay the state for a DL or get car insurance.

    44. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by camazotz · · Score: 1

      I'm not an SJW advocate by any means (though I am left-leaning) but the model you're providing is a bit hypothetical/strawman. Would work better with a real model. I'd analogize SJWs to the people who get outraged that Idris Elba is not going to be the next James Bond, and try to shout down anyone who says, "But Bond should be a caucasian Brit" with accusations of racism. SJWs see some vaguely interpretive symbol for native americans used in sports and contend it is offensive even while the native tribe is saying "meh." Those are two actual examples. SJWs rarely get to cause problems for employers because they usually work as barristas or have their etsy page up and dominate lower level positions....their inability to compromise usually serves as an obstacle to advancing in management in the first place (Silicon Valley excepted). That last part is just opinion, though.

    45. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by lgw · · Score: 1

      The GOP establishment is not conservative. Hasn't been for 20 years. The Dem establishment isn't liberal. Hasn't been for 20 years. They're two faces of the same party, who's only agenda is protecting the financial interest of their donors.

      But I take it that's not news to you, so your question seems odd.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    46. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      That series has profited $6.5 Billion. Profited. Not grossed. Net.

      Interesting. There was diatribe of a thread here on slashdot about several blockbuster movies that lost money which included HP series. Reason is to keep net profits low as possible to avoid paying taxes. Well crap, another one bites the dust to "fake news?"

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    47. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Ayanami_R · · Score: 1

      OP mentioned that Cons don't fuck you, I asked him to explain the browser vote, which clearly fucked us. what's odd about that?

      --
      "Science is the power of man"
    48. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Conservatives didn't vote that way. The GOP did. How is that unclear in any way?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    49. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Ayanami_R · · Score: 1

      The GOP represents conservatives, they picked these people, remember?

      smartass.

      --
      "Science is the power of man"
    50. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Replace the words with:

      Stupid
      Juvenile
      Whiner

      and you'll start to understand it what it means.

      And if you remember that the above applies to the person who likes to throw the term "SJW" around, then it makes even more sense.

    51. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      "That's the ehart of conservatism in America - a government without the power to fuck you."

      Care to explain the browser history vote yesterday then?

      The browser history vote was an explicit rejection that the government should be able to set rules about how ISPs operate. It was a removal of power from government hands.

    52. Re:Generation Z leans to the political right. by Ayanami_R · · Score: 1

      And yours.

      --
      "Science is the power of man"
  14. Re:It's the economy, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I'm no fan of Trump but will you butthurt Hillary fans PLEASE stop littering /. with your butthurness?

  15. Re:It's the economy, etc. by peragrin · · Score: 1

    Exactly. I bought a new car in January when I heard that production was cutting back. Now I look and I can get similar deals to what I wanted but the dealers atill have 2016 models on their lots in quantities.

    Christmas was at best mediocre this year. Discount and chain stores are closing stores just as rapidly as before.

    Trump supporters are telling me their is a pent up demand but the more I look the more I see contraction coming.

    Now a contraction is due in general as 8 years is a good run. However a stock market contraction is going to scare a lot of 401k baby boomers who watched their nest egg shrink and don't want it to do so again.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  16. Theatre? by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1


    Is there a new play on old chap?

    Everything is moving to on-demand. 4K, 10bit HDR1000 displays at home put most cinemas to shame.

    Why choose to go somewhere, sit with people playing with their phone and munching overpriced crap when you can watch it from the comfort of home with perhaps some mates?

    How is the "movie theatre" better?

    Cinema isnt dead, it's alive and well. Better than even in fact. It simply moved out of a theatre and into the home.

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
  17. Re: It's the economy, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's really odd to blame Trump for the current state of the economy. He has been in power for only 2 months. Democrats have been delaying the confirmations of his nominees for various administrative positions, too, which has limited what he had done and can do.

    The current economic problems aren't because of the administration that has been in partial control for only 2 months. These are problems thst go back to the last two administrations.

  18. Re:It's the economy, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe car makers shouldn't be pricing their stuff in the stratosphere. When a cargo van costs $60,000, and a base pickup truck costs $45k while US salaries have not improved since the 1990s, it is no wonder why automakers are not selling vehicles.

    Retail is seeing the same thing. About 10-15 years ago, retail shops decided to give the middle finger to US workers and buy their stuff from cheap overseas sweatshops. Well, the chickens have come home to roost, and we are seeing retail stores as a general industry collapsing. Sears likely won't see 2018, other stores like JCP, and other corner anchor mall stores, are dropping locations left and right.

    It is a case of pure idiocy. If you don't plow a field and drop seeds, you won't get a harvest. You ship the jobs overseas, there winds up nobody in your country who will buy your stuff.

    As for car makers, they already sell just crap here in the US. VW doesn't sell their cool vehicles like the Crafter or Amarok here for example.

  19. It's interesting to watch the class divide on /. by waspleg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most people are posting the same 2 view points (with the 3rd probably being simply the experience sucks because reasons):

    1.) Home theater systems are so much better now, mine is amazing and/or there are amazing ones available.

    2.) People, especially in the 18-24 yo age group, are fucking poor and can't afford to go to the movies (most of these are ignoring the obvious, that they can't afford the home theater system either).

    I'm not in either of those 2 categories (more like the 3rd, without the money or inclination for a huge home theater, apartment dweller and not rich with a deep loathing of crowds), but this seems like a poll worthy topic (no I didn't check to see if it already exists) with "Cowboy Neal is my projectionist" as a 4th?

  20. New Movies suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am surprised, I thought all these comic book adaptations were specifically geared towards the 18-24 age group.
    I have been trying to go to the movies for a while now, but there just isn't anything I would be interested in. Drama- no thank you, got that enough in my own life. Horror- Nah. Fantasy crap- don't think so. Chick- flick - don't have to do that anymore (I'm divorced). When was the last time a really good comedy came out ? One that got you a lot more than just a little chuckle ?

  21. Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They get tired of us glaring at them or asking them to knock off all their incessant SnapCracking, InstantGramming, TwitFacePlussing, etc. and ruining the movie for people who actually WANT to watch the content. So they stop coming. Good riddance.

  22. Re:It's the economy, etc. by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    False.

    You don't have to be a Hillary fan to hate Trump. I hate them both (there's not really much point in hating on Hillary though).

    --
    No sig today...
  23. I need money by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To paraphrase a German comedian, I need money, not an occupation. I can keep myself busy just fine, don't worry about that.

    Working is the necessary evil to get money. Just as much as the employee is the necessary evil to profit (as is the customer, by the way). Stop dancing around the subject and celebrate the "always working" idiot.

    Working is the necessary evil, not the goal.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:I need money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anarchism is the answer... to more wage slavery to unbridled power and usury of kings.
      Anarchism is not what you think it is. Read up on it, take your time, actually come to understand it.

    2. Re:I need money by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Who is talking about anarchism?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:I need money by waspleg · · Score: 1

      I completely agree but I wager that America will be dead last to figure this out. I live in a midwestern red state where suffering is considered a virtue; especially if it's for work/family.

      If you suggest that people ought not have to work, especially for basic survival needs, you're an evil communist/socialist/terrorist/unfavorable-ist-of-the-week.

      No one (in American anyway) seems to notice the slavery to their incomes. I saw somewhere, I forget where, someone (probably foreign) pointed out the contradiction of American's worship of "Democracy" while having nearly everyone working and therefore spending most of our waking lives in a dictatorship under some CEO or equivalent.

      Our system is broken. Having AI/robots take over everything will eventually result in (probably violent) revolution before people here come to their senses; if we survive that long.

  24. Re:It's the economy, etc. by TWX · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your vehicle numbers are way off.

    A 2017 Ram 1500 base truck is about $26,500 MSRP, which probably means it can be had for $25,000 at the dealer if buying off the lot. If you want the base as a 4x4 it's about $31,500 MSRP, which can probably still be had for under $30,000 out the door.

    A Ram Promaster 1500 (based on the large Fiat van chassis) is around $30,000 MSRP. The 2500 model is $33,000 MSRP and the 3500 is about $36,000 MSRP, all as cargo configurations. The passenger variants, only availabe as a 2500 chassis and a 3500 chassis are $34,500 MSRP and $38,500 MSRP respectively, and given that there are a lot more parts on the passenger versions this $1500-$2500 markup isn't unreasonable.

    Now, if you want the Laramie package, or you want all leather, or you want the megacab with the 8' bed and the Longhorn custom interior with the Katzin seats, yeah, you're going to be spending quite a bit more. Thing is, you don't really need that stuff. You might need a stronger engine in the base model truck, but those modern V6 engines that all three domestic automakers use are quite good, better than their entry-level V8s were only a generation ago. You probably don't need that upgraded configuration.

    If your numbers are coming in $60,000 for a cargo van and $45,000 for a pickup truck, it's because of standards that you set.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  25. Re:It's the economy, etc. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    We're overdue for a recession anyway. This will be the Trump Recession and not the Hillary Recession.

  26. Re: Movies are a ripoff by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Kids have no money and are too stupid to realize why they still work at Starbucks with a college degree.

    If they're working at Starbucks and have a college degree, you can't them kids. They're adults. Not every adult gets hired straight out of college. I worked as a kitchen cook for three years after I got my college degree and before I started my technical career in 1997.

  27. Not the target demographic? by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

    I'm well outside the 18 to 24 demographic myself, so I may not be best placed to comment on this, but I'm not really sure how many of today's big movie releases are really targeted at that demographic.

    Increasingly releases seem to be split into three categories:

    1) Very Important Movies About Very Important Things (TM), also known as Oscar-bait, which is usually targeted at the middle-aged-and-older demographic.

    2) Millennial/Gen-X nostalgia-fests based on comic-book franchises or reboots of old movies and the like which were big for people born in the '70s and '80s, but probably don't have much resonance for people born after around 1990 or so.

    3) Kids' films, for which the actual spending-demographic is usually the parents in their 30s, 40s and 50s who are actually footing the bill.

    That makes commercial sense, because those demographics are where the spending power lies. A visit to the cinema these days can be a fairly pricey affair, so I suspect the 18-24 demographic might just not be seen as worth chasing.

    1. Re:Not the target demographic? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And 2 is about 90% of all movies. It's too much of a risk to finance original ideas. Let's remake a 20-year old movie that was only sort of good or put that established board game, video game, comic book brand on the big screen. And even for the kids' movies, more than three-quarters are a sequel or remake.

      Oddly, science fiction has had a good number of original titles lately that aren't terrible - even with the mainstream audiences.

  28. I see 1-2 movies per year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    8 years ago I would practically live at the theatre.

    While there may be some truth to younger people not going as often, I blame..
    1- awful movies
    2- high ticket prices
    3- convenience of watching at home to avoid high ticket prices

    1. Re:I see 1-2 movies per year by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      4- long movies.

      Seeing a movie is part of a night out with friends/family/date, it shouldn't be the entire night.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  29. Stop putting out junk or re-runs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The movies could stop putting out junk. Perfect example is Batman vs. Superman. I only went for my teen son who has been a huge comic books fan since forever. I was so bored the entire movie, but he had a blast. He'll grow out of it soon and want a real plot and not just CGI and slug-em-out-fests, so be warned.

    Re-runs: Where to even start. How many Spidermans, Supermans, etc., do we need? GhostBusters Female-Edition? Totally lame. Matrix Reboot? Totally lame.

    I was enjoying the new comic book movies. But it's just too much of the same and so little to draw me back. I haven't even seen X-Men Apocalypse and was just going to RedBox it (not even buy it, which will be a first for my family).

    The only movie which was fun and new for me recently was Rogue One - because it was Star Wars-ish, but it wasn't a re-run of Star Wars like SW7 was. SW7 was so unimaginative, and like GB F-E, much the same, with a female lead instead of a male.

    I'm pretty much to the point where it has to be something that really moves me to get me to pony up and go to the movies, and when I do I'm going to pre-purchase the exact seats I want a week ahead (which means extra cost for the fancier theater in town with the full recliners, as it is the only one with specific seating sales).

    With a 70 inch TV and great sound at home, I really don't feel like I'm missing much, other than the hassle of other rude people, their kids, their diseases, overpriced unhealthy food.

  30. The flip side of that coin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    MPAA: "You're an evil pirate. You'll be caught, fined and jailed. We have the finest government enforcement agents money can buy. Fuck you."

    1. Re:The flip side of that coin... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      MPAA: "You're an evil pirate. You'll be caught, fined and jailed. We have the finest government enforcement agents money can buy. Fuck you."

      Man, even their haikus suck.

  31. In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    18-24 year-olds don't matter for shit

    now get off my lawn!

    1. Re:In related news... by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I know I didn't when I was 18-24, 18-26 actually. I barely had enough money for food, and sometimes didn't. I wasn't about to spend it on a movie. I probably saw 6 films in as many years and there was a $1 theater 4 minute walk away, $2 inflation adjusted.

  32. Re:Minitrue by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Double plus good citizen!

  33. Content that you control. Very satisfying. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    When my daughter was about three years old she would use an "educational" Reader Rabbit kind of software. If she spells the three letter word correctly, a line drawing would animate and make sound. B E E, zzzzz ! She would squeal with delight and repeatedly spell B E E.

    She would also watch Disney cartoon animations, she liked them and enjoyed them too. But somehow the simple black and white line drawing animation produced as much delight in her as did the rich colors and fast moving animations of the Lion King or Cinderella.

    I think the difference is her ability to control the action. Sitting back and dumbly drinking in whatever spews forth from the screen is one form of entertainment. But if you can control what is going on, even very simple content can be very satisfying.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Content that you control. Very satisfying. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think the difference is her ability to control the action. Sitting back and dumbly drinking in whatever spews forth from the screen is one form of entertainment. But if you can control what is going on, even very simple content can be very satisfying.

      My lady has an aversion to video games but even she can acknowledge that many movies would make a whole lot more sense as a game. Most action movies fall into this category. Sitting and watching that stuff is still thrilling, but it's nothing compared to actually controlling the experience.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  34. Re:It's the economy, etc. by KingMotley · · Score: 1

    Most baby boomers don't have their retirement in stocks anymore -- any decent financial manager would have converted the bulk into more stable investments long ago.

  35. Cost of Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if it didn't cost 20 bucks for a single movie trip for a single person more people would go to the movies. For me it costs roughly 100 bucks to go to the movies with my family. That is two tanks of gas, that I cannot justify wasting 100 dollars on movies.

  36. Re:It's the economy, etc. by KingMotley · · Score: 1

    WTF? VW Crafter cool? ROFLMAO!

    I suggest you stop trying to fit the average person into a high-end pickup truck and something more like what people in any other (sane) country drives. You get get good cars for under $20k with some really really nice features.

  37. Streaming by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

    If Netflix, Amazon, HBO, et. al. can continue to churn out good-quality productions at a decent rate there's not much need to go see a movie theater anymore. For $10/month you get hundreds of hours of entertainment, vs two hours for $50.

    1. Re:Streaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How come nobody goes to see plays anymore? It used to be a point of pride to have a stage in your community for people to put on a play. Play back this logic until you get to why don't we have gladiator battles anymore? Shit changes. Nobody's ever been able to deal with it.

    2. Re:Streaming by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      How come nobody goes to see plays anymore? It used to be a point of pride to have a stage in your community for people to put on a play.

      That's so elitist. Next thing you want is civics to be taught in school.

  38. Re:It's the economy, etc. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    As a moderate conservative and a NEVER TRUMP supporter, I want stop complaining about Trump. He's neither a conservative nor Republican, and, until a few short years ago, a Clinton Democrat.

  39. Re:It's the economy, etc. by peragrin · · Score: 1

    75% of people are not directed to safe routes but to the routes that make financial planners more money. They point out that their fees are lower than competitor while not showing what there fees actually are.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  40. Economics argue against going to movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As others have said, widescreen high res TVs are a real danger to the movie industry. Everyone gets a good view. And, at a few hundred bucks, most people can afford one no problem. You don't need a fancy home theater setup.

    Price to view the movie: if it's been out a while, it's around a buck and a half. If it's brand new, it's several dollars. AND--this is the important part--that's the total cost regardless of how many people are viewing the movie! Go to the theater, and you have to multiply the price (which is already significantly higher) for every viewer! You don't even have to be a family to appreciate those ticket savings. If it's just a bunch of buddies hanging out, that saved money can go straight to buying a pizza together or whatever shared cost you want. It's still money in your pocket.

  41. very few new movies worth seeing by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I blame the low-brow entirely formulaic dross that Hollywood continues to churn out.

    Then need to take their CGI budget and instead spend it on script writers that are capable of original, intelligent thought.

    1. Re:very few new movies worth seeing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I blame the low-brow entirely formulaic dross that Hollywood continues to churn out.

      I don't think that logic works. That would make sense if we were talking about older audiences who have basically seen all these movies before. But the young people who haven't already been exposed to all the plots and archetypes might still want to go see them.

      I am not interested in movies (I watch few of them even at home) because they are all the same old shit I've seen before. Most of them are literally just remakes of the same old films, often with the same old title. A new director with essentially the same script. Why would I want to see that? At least make some different books into movies.

      Hollywood is going down the toilet. They are still huge so it will take a long time unless LA falls into the ocean, but I've been keeping my fingers crossed for that one for a long time and it still hasn't happened. They will be able to hang on with superhero movies for a while yet, but their dominance is shaking.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:very few new movies worth seeing by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> Hollywood is going down the toilet.

      I think they are just riding along on a LOT of weight and momentum and a death-grip on the industry (a lot like Microsoft), but the more I think about Hollywood eventually failing the more I think that would actually be a good thing. That said I'm sure they won't ever totally go away, they'll just transfer over to streaming or whatever current trend/mechanism they can use on hang on.

  42. Re:It's interesting to watch the class divide on / by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The second point obscures the fact that you can break down the cost over time. I built quite a nice home theater, which, minus the TV upgrade a few years back and the BR player a few years before that, I've had for 17years at this point. I use it for all entertainment, not just movies. Video games (probably a bigger want from this demographic) was really the initial reason. Divide my sub $2k outlay over 17 years and multiple use cases and multiple people and it's a better return than taking my wife to a few "possibly decent" movies a year.

  43. Re:It's interesting to watch the class divide on / by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    The 4th thing is that The Pirate Bay provides a much better experience than the cinema or Bluray, costs nothing and people don't mind waiting for that.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  44. take the money and run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most CEOs and their lackeys in corporate world today don't qualify as leaders. They're narcissistic sociopaths that creates short term gains to justify their astronomical compensation packages and skip town when things go south. The board that is suppose to be the watchdog are now themselves sociopaths that bleeds companies for their own benefits.

  45. Re:It's interesting to watch the class divide on / by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    Most people are posting the same 2 view points (with the 3rd probably being simply the experience sucks because reasons):

    1.) Home theater systems are so much better now, mine is amazing and/or there are amazing ones available.

    2.) People, especially in the 18-24 yo age group, are fucking poor and can't afford to go to the movies (most of these are ignoring the obvious, that they can't afford the home theater system either).

    I'm not in either of those 2 categories (more like the 3rd, without the money or inclination for a huge home theater, apartment dweller and not rich with a deep loathing of crowds), but this seems like a poll worthy topic (no I didn't check to see if it already exists) with "Cowboy Neal is my projectionist" as a 4th?

    I'm #3. I don't have a "home theater", nor do I really want one. I was "fucking poor" when I was 18-24, at least in the low part of that range, but I went to the movie a lot more than I do now when I'm not "fucking poor".

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  46. Re:It's interesting to watch the class divide on / by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even without a fancy home theater setup, the home video experience is so much better than it used to be. I had a 25 inch TV for the living room growing up. That was the biggest we could afford. So the home video experience was colorbled fuzzy video and tinny audio rattling in a plastic case on a tiny screen far from where you were sitting. These days you can get a 50 inch screen for 300 bucks. Not exactly an impulse purchase but definitely not a luxury item. And the video and audio quality are orders of magnitude better than VHS. The only reason anyone has to go to a theater is to see a movie before it comes out on home video. Who wants to put up with the crowds, the jerks on their cell phones, the incontinent movie goer who must get up to pee every 10 minutes, the whole experience costing 2 people a sixth of the TV purchase, the inability to pause/go back/turn up/down down the volume, and the long list of other annoyances?

  47. Re:It's the economy, etc. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Most baby boomers don't have their retirement in stocks anymore -- any decent financial manager would have converted the bulk into more stable investments long ago.

    Not after the Great Recession. Some seniors have 95% of their portfolio in the stock market to juice returns.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/stocks-have-tripled-since-crisis-but-low-rates-are-still-squeezing-savers-1488969009

  48. difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Theaters might go the way of Vaudeville or, like Vaudeville, morph into Broadway and bring us to places we can't imagine now. All spectacle all the time.

    The difference is that Vaudeville didn't buy themselves congresscritters that rubberstamp laws to protect their racket.

  49. Hip jive talkin', daddy-o! by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Hitting the Big Screen

    I don't know about you squares, but I'm always asking my best pals if they want to hit the big screen at le weekend.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  50. Re:It's the economy, etc. by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    The Ford Raptor is a beautiful beast, though.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  51. Why are we surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if the ticket prices and concessions didn't rape your wallet and the movies themselves weren't total trash, people might save a few bucks back to watch one.

  52. Re:It's the economy, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a moderate conservative and a NEVER TRUMP supporter

    AKA Fascist

  53. The industry is stupid by whitroth · · Score: 1

    It's an old saying that a producer's IQ was equal to his belt size. It's also an old, old aphorism that to get the IQ of a committee, you add up their belts, and divide by the number of them.

    Year before last, we went to see Interstellar, in IMAX. TWENTY FREAKING DOLLARS each for the three of us. And popcorn and drinks? Another $15 or more. To go to a bloody movie.

    Hell, half the population can't afford that. And it's the refreshments that pay the staff. Back in the day, the studios owned theaters, and paid the staff. Now, they don't. It's all how much more can the CEO and friends get as a "salary" and "bonus".

    You want to massively increase attendance? Cut the prices in half.

    When I was growing up, before most of you were born, I got that under capitalism, if sales went down, you lowered prices until they came up. Since the eighties, the game is played that if sales go down, raise prices to "keep a steady cash flow".

    1. Re:The industry is stupid by losfromla · · Score: 1

      good points. If they keep that up, ticket prices will go to $5 million dollars each and then they only need to sell 200 tickets to keep their steady cash flow scam going. That will be great for the very rich, they'll have a dedicated sales agent to sell them their ticket, limo pick-up to the movie theater, and of course a great meal catered in-theater by the chef from the nearest 4-Star restaurant.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    2. Re:The industry is stupid by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Since the eighties, the game is played that if sales go down, raise prices to "keep a steady cash flow".

      It's called whatever the market will bear, and it's a basic tenet of capitalism. If you charge too much eventually people find an alternative, or they die or riot or something, so charging the maximum amount you can while maintaining a kind of stasis is the universal goal. It's not setting the highest price people will pay today, it's setting the highest price they will pay today and then come back and give you more money tomorrow.

      I don't know if the price points now are optimal, but a lot of the people priced out of going to the movies probably aren't profitable customers anyway. They sneak in snacks instead of buying them, and the snacks are where the big profit comes from while the ticket price generally covers little more than the film itself.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  54. NO, that's not correct. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An SJW, as opposed to someone with a social conscience, is someone who fights against "injustice" ***on behalf of someone else, whether or not they need or asked for it***.

    Like the right (esp. christian right) with their immorality outrage against those they do not want existing, these on the left are using the plight of others, especially minorities, as weapons to attach those who do not ascribe to the same political stance in all ways as they do.

    They aren't for the rights of those minorities, except in a fairly loose and tangential way, they are much more interested in how to use that rhertoric to enforce their standards on others.

    Just like the "immorality" rants of the especially christian right. There's no actual desire to see more morality, see their own skeletons when the closet is opened, but use it as a weapon to attack others for having the "wrong" political opinion.

    1. Re: NO, that's not correct. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so the end of slavery was just a sjw issue?

  55. Re:It's the economy, etc. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    AKA Fascist

    That's where Trump is taking America.

  56. It's the youttube effect by lamer01 · · Score: 1

    Obviously a lot of you don't have kids/acquaintances in that age group. Their free time is spent messaging, skyping and watching the multitude of famous youtubers. There is little free time left for anything else like personal hygiene, outdoor activities, movies, etc. The constant-on connection is occupying all of their free/leisure time.

  57. Re:It's the economy stupid by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    I saw a movie last month for $9. Full adult price. Not only that, but I got to sit in one of those super computer controlled Japanese recliners. The theater was maybe 25% full (late Saturday afternoon).

  58. Re: It's the economy, etc. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    It's really odd to blame Trump for the current state of the economy.

    That would be odd. It's only due to your poor reading comprehension skills that you think that I'm doing that.

    He has been in power for only 2 months.

    So? He has already made sweeping policy changes and more to the point, taken credit for bringing jobs back to America which are in fact not coming back to America. If he wants to take the credit, then his athletic supporters can be reminded of the fact that he has done no such thing.

    Democrats have been delaying the confirmations of his nominees for various administrative positions, too, which has limited what he had done and can do.

    Yeah, they've managed to delay some Russian employees from being placed in our government. Good on them.

    The current economic problems aren't because of the administration that has been in partial control for only 2 months. These are problems thst go back to the last two administrations.

    Trump claimed that he would make deals with the automakers to bring jobs back to America. But the jobs are leaving America. Exactly the opposite of what he promised is happening. And some of them are leaving specifically because Trump has become president. Notably, trust in American services is at an all-time low, and people are being dissuaded even more strongly from traveling to the USA than ever before by his travel policies. It's not just these muslim bans, or the muslim laptop ban for that matter, travelers from many countries are reporting having their laptops imaged and the like. Trump is having a chilling effect on America.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  59. Re:It's the economy, etc. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    A 2017 Ram 1500 base truck is about $26,500 MSRP,

    Have you driven the Ram? There's a reason why it's the least popular truck.

    A Ram Promaster 1500 (based on the large Fiat van chassis) is around $30,000 MSRP.

    It is a complete fucking shitpile. Every review of every model of Fiat Ducato (by any name) shows that it is underpowered, handles like dogshit, and is the least reliable vehicle in the segment.

    FCA is circling the toilet bowl for a reason. Expect them to get bought out by VW within the next five years, because VW is going to need a new partner.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  60. Because Justice is in the eye of the beholder by Texmaize · · Score: 2

    Terms like "Social Justice" are selected because they have the ability to end arguments without ever having one. When some, like the OP, here the term justice they immediately assume that anyone agrees with the position is right, and anyone who disagrees is unjust, and wrong. Since no thought is ever given to the underlying idea, it is very easy for harmful or even evil ideas being as "Justice".

    People tend to be very excited to sign on to "justice" causes, until it effects them personally. For example, a typical SJW maybe very much in favor of rules that help the poor, especially when that means someone else needs to give them money for something. After all, what kind of heartless ass does not want to help the poor? If they got it, and you don't, you should get some too..... But, if you point out the SJW that they are in fact very rich, being a member of the Western world, and they should perhaps give up 30% of their money and things to help someone in the developing world, they seldom are in favor of doing so. It does not matter if you can point out that statistically and materially the SJW who has the internet, abundant running water, and iPhone, transportation, a luxurious (by the standards of the third world) apartment etc. is as wealthy to their third world counterpart as they are compared to a "rich" person, they have no interest in hearing this. Rich is always other people. Justice is always something someone else must sacrifice for. Why? Because it is not justice in the real sense of the word.

    To the credit of generation Z( or whatever you are calling them), they are starting to notice that the very narrow world view propagated by the ruling class politicians and mass media is not matching with reality. They are actually thinking, observing, and reading more sources. Trying to win arguments by mere labels or tribal grunting is wearing thin. For the first time in a while, there might be hope of having honest discussions and attempting to solve problems instead of having policy be slogan.

    --
    "Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
  61. Missing the big picture by Texmaize · · Score: 1

    The funny thing is, I haven't seen someone else tie this article to piracy. I have seen several articles and comments posted on slashdot swearing that somehow people downloading movies for free does not decrease theatre attendance. Am I the only one is not shocked to read the age group the pirates the most has a declining attendance?

    --
    "Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
    1. Re:Missing the big picture by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I think there was an article on Slashdot a few days ago where the most likely age group to steal an ebook is rich people in their 40's.

    2. Re:Missing the big picture by losfromla · · Score: 1

      damn! They're onto us!

      --
      Only I can judge you.
  62. $26K for a fucking TRUCK?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's $16K too much for two seats in a small cab dragging a simple box.

  63. So are good movies. by Simulant · · Score: 1


    IMO, anyway.

  64. Re:It's the economy, etc. by lgw · · Score: 2

    , I want stop complaining about Trump. He's neither a conservative nor Republican,

    He's not establishment conservative nor Republican. He's very much channeling the political will of the American working class, plus those of us fed up with the corruptness and political theater of the "establishment-media complex".

    Establishment Republicans, Democrats, and the old-school media (but I repeat myself) are all utterly dismissive of a very large chunk of voters in this democracy, talking down to them, calling them ignorant and racist, and in general saying "let them eat cake". A sentiment frequently repeated by Slashdot posters, I might add.

    Fuck that. Trump may be far from my ideal candidate, much like Bernie was, but the vast hatred for him by the establishment, and all the self-described elite who think they're just better people than those working class brutes, demonstrates he's a "good enough" choice. I'm not a big Trump fan, but I loath the modern hipster-pseudo-intellectual progressive crowd, so: you go Trump, kick some ass.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  65. Re:It's the economy, etc. by lgw · · Score: 1

    Don't confuse fee-for-advice financial planners with the crooks at full-service brokerages. You describe the later, but most people (even near retirement) don't have the wealth to attract those sharks.

    Actual financial planners, or just plain old-school investment advice, has you mostly out of stocks at retirement. I can't vouch for "keep your age as a percentage in bonds", but it's very common advice.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  66. Re:It's the economy, etc. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

    He's very much channeling the political will of the American working class, plus those of us fed up with the corruptness and political theater of the "establishment-media complex".

    Uh, no. What Trump says and what he does are opposite things. He says "insurance for everyone," he supporting a healthcare bill that will take away insurance for 26M Americans. What the working class doesn't understand is that ObamaCare covers them, either directly through an exchange or indirectly through small business tax credits. They will get hit the hardest under TrumpCare.

    Translation: "Fuck you, working class! My billionaire buddies and I are getting a $200K tax break that was funding ObamaCare."

  67. Re:It's the economy, etc. by losfromla · · Score: 1

    Yeah, instead of cake trump is going to let the American working class eat shit so his billionaire and multimillionaire heroes can get yuuugge! tax breaks.

    As usual, lgw, you're trying to overcome your cognitive dissonance with arguments that can't stand up to the most cursory examination. All the evidence makes it clear that tRumpf is working hard for the interests of the wealthy while paying much lip service (and literally nothing else) to the working classes: middle, lower, and way lower.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  68. it's the cord-cutters (like me) by scatbomb · · Score: 1

    I have no idea what is in theaters right now because I haven't watched a commercial for years. Like many other young people, I get my media from Netflix, Amazon, and/or Youtube.

    Hollywood movies have lost their luster. Everything feels so stale, played-out, and formulaic. Hardly anyone is taking any creative chances with their stories (probably because it costs $100MM to make a Hollywood movie, so you damn well better check all the boxes).

    I haven't seen a good movie in the theaters for years, and the enjoyment was lessened by the steep prices, which are hard to pay for as a college student or on a graduate student stipend. I have a job and money now, but my desire to go back to the theaters has not returned.

    I will admit, the movie experience in japan was great. Assigned seating, beer, nice clean chairs, and nobody playing with their phone.

  69. Re:It's the economy stupid by losfromla · · Score: 1

    so, no popcorn or drink... Unfair comparison.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  70. Re:It's the economy stupid by losfromla · · Score: 1

    Movie theaters charge this way because the movie studios take the lion's share of the profits. Movie theaters make almost nothing on the ticket and so try to squeeze it out of concessions.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  71. Cheaper by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    They are hitting the small screen and also the bong.
    In the cinema, the latter can get expensive with sweets sold at their worth in gold.

  72. Re:It's the economy stupid by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    I never got food at a movie theater. My parents said that was for stupid people. I had a 7th grade teacher who told the class the same thing when we were studying how movie theaters make their money (it's from concessions, not ticket sales).

  73. Re:It's the economy stupid by losfromla · · Score: 1

    That's fine and good but my point is that you were comparing apples to oranges as the initial comment was about the price including a popcorn and drink.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  74. Re:It's the economy, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the technology. Nobody goes to the cinema any more when they can have just as good or better experience at home.

  75. Re: It's the economy, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your level of desperation is unbelievable.

  76. Re: It's the economy, etc. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Your level of desperation is unbelievable.

    Many of us feel that way, since we are watching the Fourth Reich being constructed before our very eyes. Maybe you're whiter than white and not a quarter-hispanic crypto-jew, but some of us are concerned.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  77. In fact Ram is so shit it needs a double reply by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    The last time anyone should have bought a Dodge truck without a diesel was in the seventies, back when their engines were better than everyone else's. (They just were. Y'all can argue if you want, but you'll be wrong.) Through the eighties and up until a few years ago, the reason to buy a Dodge pickup was to get a Cummins straight six, which is a better-built engine than literally any of its contemporary competition. But today Cummins is building V engines and you can get one in a Nissan. Nissan is at least ten times more competent than Chrysler (Dodge trucks) and at least a hundred times more competent than Fiat (Dodge vans.)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  78. What was in the movies each year? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    A lot of the demographic fluctuation year to year is likely a result of what is showing that year. For example, we saw a significant jump in African-American moviegoing in 2016 (after a steady decline from 2012 to 2015) because of the large number of films telling stories that are centered on their experiences, including the Best Picture winner and two additional nominees. Nearly all of the box office for Hidden Figures came this year and Get Out has also been a hit, so I expect African-American moviegoing numbers will also be strong in 2017.

  79. How do they know ages? by martinfb · · Score: 1

    No one ever asked my age when I went to the movies. And I went more in 2016 than in the prior 3 years!

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  80. Netflix And Chill by Pezbian · · Score: 1

    In this age of everyone having a camera in their pocket, theaters don't really offer privacy like they used to.

    That, and when I was a teen, the biggest TV I had access to was a 46" front projection POS from the early 80s and it required blackout curtains it was so dim. The next-largest "real" TV was a 25". I picked up a 70" 4K set during the holidays last year that blows away any cinema experience I've ever had, short of d-box seats. That and the fact we're no longer stuck with VHS kind of castrates the only thing cinema had going for it.

    Plus, I can make my own damn popcorn with real butter for way less than a dollar for a big-ass bowl.

    --
    In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
  81. Re:It's the economy, etc. by toddestan · · Score: 1

    It's too bad they got rid of the Ram Tradesman Van (basically the cargo variant of the Dodge Caravan). Not the most reliable van, but worked well enough for light duty use and won't bankrupt you keeping it on the road.

    If VW is smart they'll stay well away from FCA, but you're right - they seem made for each other.