How did Kangaroos get from wherever the ark landed to Australia? Without building another ark, of course. Or did the ark stop in lots of places to drop animals off on various continents and islands?
This is the same as if the pilot told a self flying plane to fly into the Alps. Do you sue the company who made the plane because it allowed the pilot to do this?
You can't say that bats do or do not eat a certain insect. Different species of bats eat different things. The main bats in North America impacted by this are the Big Brown Bat and the Little Brown Bat. Yes, the BBB eats larger insects primarily. The LBB lives near water and eats various aquatic flying insects. May Flies when in season, black fly, but also mosquitoes. They consume large quantities when the other insects are in other stages of their life cycle. Mosquitoes tend to have offspring constantly.
Science has always been full of bad science. The people involved have always had agendas. The problem is that we are creating so much data, that it is hard to process and identify what was created in a rigorous process and what is just a pile of crap. And, it is not easy to tell them apart. Then you have people involved. Newton tried his best to discredit Hooke. Hooke was lacking in some areas, but a genius in others. Some scientists just create large quantities of data, and don't know what to do with it. Others have a specific idea, and ignore anything which proves them wrong. Science has just gotten so big, it is hard to find the good amongst the, not really bad but, useless. Scientists must publish or be ignored, so they create anything they can to keep going.
First, as the Washington Post states, "Voter turnout in primary elections this year has been abysmal." People complain about government policy, yet don't exercise their power to change it. They would rather "like" something on Facebook, like that has some power to change policy. If you were able to get all those likes to turn to votes, you could have an impact on policy. Second, if you don't want companies tracking your Internet usage, stop clicking on advertisements. Get all your Facebook friends to stop clicking. Soon they will be unprofitable and will go away. Just complaining about it doesn't change anything. Protesting in the street doesn't change anything, unless you get people to change their habits. If you can't find anyone who supports your viewpoint to vote for, run yourself.
That would make sense, but the system I am referring to doesn't. There is a "Q" class, but it is not a queue. I don't think the people who wrote this know what a queue is. Took us a while to figure out that "rlogic" was the actions initiated from the right side of the screen. Doesn't tell us what they do, but it made some sense. The amazing thing is the system works, even if we don't know what the parts do. The naming standards look more like algebra than Java. We think the whole system must be trying to solve for "x".
His point is that it doesn't contain strange syntax that isn't easy to follow at first glance. One of the original purposes of Java was to eliminate the complexity of C++ has from its C legacy. When you use a command in Java, it does what its supposed to do. They are not using it as some obscure purpose to take advantage of some quirk in the hardware. Java did this by defining its own hardware of sorts, the JVM. It moves the complexity of the actual system to a group of programmers who specialize in that arena, the JVM developers. It's not that all Java is readable, we maintain one system we inherited that was developed by a poorly trained group of developers. The names of classes provide no help in understanding the code. One of the main classes is "M". They also put things together in classes that have nothing to do with each other. We are re-developing that system from scratch to fix it. Even with this, there are no commands in the system that we don't understand when we read them.
I think kids go to school to learn new things, like expressing themselves with chalk and writing in cursive. Why would you teach things they already know? Kids learn wonderful things like art and music in school. If Microsoft has its way, they would only learn Powerpoint.
When the first stars formed, the energy released re-ionized the entire universe, so that first-last burst of radiation was absorbed by electrons. The second last-burst is what we see now, when the universe cooled to allow the electrons to re-combine. Some of it has been absorbed over time. But, the universe is now transparent. Much of it hasn't met anything that could stop it from the time it was created until it hits one of our antenna. BTW, being absorbed by a microwave radio antenna does destroy the radiation received. It's not the amount that we are measuring, but the wavelength that is critical. When creating the CMB maps, they do have to take into account relatively nearby objects that could stop it, including the plane of our galaxy.
We already know how to build one. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I... Current ones are looking for neutrinos at a different energy level, since we are looking for solar and supernova neutrinos. We need a very large one built to a different standard. The hard part is determining the direction where each neutrino is coming from.
Amongst all the/. arguments, I would like to say that that is a well written article. It gets a very complex point across in a way that is easily understood. I didn't realize previously that our view of the CMB would change over time. Makes sense, we see the CMB who's light happens to get here now.
Slashdot Mirror
How did Kangaroos get from wherever the ark landed to Australia? Without building another ark, of course. Or did the ark stop in lots of places to drop animals off on various continents and islands?
This is the same as if the pilot told a self flying plane to fly into the Alps. Do you sue the company who made the plane because it allowed the pilot to do this?
We need to work together to manipulate all search results to lead to whichever xkcd is most relevant to the topic.
You can't say that bats do or do not eat a certain insect. Different species of bats eat different things. The main bats in North America impacted by this are the Big Brown Bat and the Little Brown Bat. Yes, the BBB eats larger insects primarily. The LBB lives near water and eats various aquatic flying insects. May Flies when in season, black fly, but also mosquitoes. They consume large quantities when the other insects are in other stages of their life cycle. Mosquitoes tend to have offspring constantly.
Science has always been full of bad science. The people involved have always had agendas. The problem is that we are creating so much data, that it is hard to process and identify what was created in a rigorous process and what is just a pile of crap. And, it is not easy to tell them apart. Then you have people involved. Newton tried his best to discredit Hooke. Hooke was lacking in some areas, but a genius in others. Some scientists just create large quantities of data, and don't know what to do with it. Others have a specific idea, and ignore anything which proves them wrong. Science has just gotten so big, it is hard to find the good amongst the, not really bad but, useless. Scientists must publish or be ignored, so they create anything they can to keep going.
I realize they can still track you. The point is to make it unprofitable, and they will stop.
First, as the Washington Post states, "Voter turnout in primary elections this year has been abysmal." People complain about government policy, yet don't exercise their power to change it. They would rather "like" something on Facebook, like that has some power to change policy. If you were able to get all those likes to turn to votes, you could have an impact on policy. Second, if you don't want companies tracking your Internet usage, stop clicking on advertisements. Get all your Facebook friends to stop clicking. Soon they will be unprofitable and will go away. Just complaining about it doesn't change anything. Protesting in the street doesn't change anything, unless you get people to change their habits. If you can't find anyone who supports your viewpoint to vote for, run yourself.
That would make sense, but the system I am referring to doesn't. There is a "Q" class, but it is not a queue. I don't think the people who wrote this know what a queue is. Took us a while to figure out that "rlogic" was the actions initiated from the right side of the screen. Doesn't tell us what they do, but it made some sense. The amazing thing is the system works, even if we don't know what the parts do. The naming standards look more like algebra than Java. We think the whole system must be trying to solve for "x".
His point is that it doesn't contain strange syntax that isn't easy to follow at first glance. One of the original purposes of Java was to eliminate the complexity of C++ has from its C legacy. When you use a command in Java, it does what its supposed to do. They are not using it as some obscure purpose to take advantage of some quirk in the hardware. Java did this by defining its own hardware of sorts, the JVM. It moves the complexity of the actual system to a group of programmers who specialize in that arena, the JVM developers. It's not that all Java is readable, we maintain one system we inherited that was developed by a poorly trained group of developers. The names of classes provide no help in understanding the code. One of the main classes is "M". They also put things together in classes that have nothing to do with each other. We are re-developing that system from scratch to fix it. Even with this, there are no commands in the system that we don't understand when we read them.
The V-22s in Nepal are working well. It was the old reliable UH-1 that crashed.
They will go away in a few years.
Those V-22s are doing well helping out in Nepal after the earthquake. The seem to have the bugs worked out.
Now no one's garage door opener will ever work again.
I think kids go to school to learn new things, like expressing themselves with chalk and writing in cursive. Why would you teach things they already know? Kids learn wonderful things like art and music in school. If Microsoft has its way, they would only learn Powerpoint.
No, that is why I said "Current ones are looking for neutrinos at a different energy level"
When the first stars formed, the energy released re-ionized the entire universe, so that first-last burst of radiation was absorbed by electrons. The second last-burst is what we see now, when the universe cooled to allow the electrons to re-combine. Some of it has been absorbed over time. But, the universe is now transparent. Much of it hasn't met anything that could stop it from the time it was created until it hits one of our antenna. BTW, being absorbed by a microwave radio antenna does destroy the radiation received. It's not the amount that we are measuring, but the wavelength that is critical. When creating the CMB maps, they do have to take into account relatively nearby objects that could stop it, including the plane of our galaxy.
We already know how to build one. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I... Current ones are looking for neutrinos at a different energy level, since we are looking for solar and supernova neutrinos. We need a very large one built to a different standard. The hard part is determining the direction where each neutrino is coming from.
Amongst all the /. arguments, I would like to say that that is a well written article. It gets a very complex point across in a way that is easily understood. I didn't realize previously that our view of the CMB would change over time. Makes sense, we see the CMB who's light happens to get here now.
Was this in California? That's called and earthquake.
Why not offer pirates upgrades to Vista? It would get them on a supported platform and punish them at the same time.
It's because they can't say "Pahk the Cah At Hahvad Yahd".
I'll have to invite you to the next wedding.
PENN STATE!
I thought the President was a Democrat. When did he stop ruling?
Five minutes later and it wouldn't have mattered so much. Shocking cock up. The mice were furious.