Re:Exposé? Gratuitous accent usage...
on
Jaguar is Over
·
· Score: 1
Bad? You must be French. Where I come from, language serves people. I just *know* there's a "Soviet Russia" joke in there somewhere.
Re:Brushed Metal Appearance
on
Jaguar is Over
·
· Score: 1
Now I can understand why one would want, say, a media player, or an internet exploder, but unless I was on a safari, why would I want a panther finder at all, leave alone care about the texture of it's metallic finish?
"Capitalism" doesn't care if they fail or, alternatively, reform and whoop Asia's butt. There's no organization so screwed up that a revolution can't fix it.
This is true. Look at the content of the updates. In the MS case, they are bug fixes, while in the Apple case they are feature enhancements. Don't believe me, go look for yourself.
filet mignon? you poor thing. I would choke on anything so coarse. I can only eat beef if it is grown in zero-g and raised on crocus stamens. perrier is very harsh on the skin, unless it is saturated with jamaican blue mountain, and frankly even then it's too septic without some astringent johnny walker blue label liberally admixed.
hey, you want quality thinking, you need quality fuel.
The issue is that the simple, cheap means of converting hydrogen into electricity (so to speak), namely the proton-exchange membrane, requires a "reformer" to liberate the hydrogen before it can be used. These reformers tend to run hot (think "Reform School Girls"), and nobody likes to drive a hydrogen-powered pocket rocket that includes a blast-furnace.
Essentially anything with hydrogen or carbon in it is flammable in a sufficiently oxygen-rich atmosphere at sufficiently high temperature. In air, pretty much everything you are wearing is considerably more flammable than diesel.
You are simply wrong about the Hindenburg. Hydrogen-oxygen flames are essentially invisible. Look at photos of the Hindenberg disaster. Those blinding yellow-orange flames are aluminum oxide in the paint covering the canvas burning like, well, an incindiary -- since that's what it is.
> Scientists also said that transporting hydrogen > from fossil fuel plants to automobile filling > stations will be more difficult than anyone has > anticipated.
Even more difficult than the "Scientists" who said this anticipated?! Wow, that's really difficult.
Here's what really piques my ire about this thread: Cinege's critics are essentially demonizing stalkers who raise irrelevancies in order to conduct ad hominem attacks. He could be Jeffrey Dahmer in drag or the last remaining clone of der Fuhrer, and it wouldn't make one bit of difference relative to the truth or falsity of his statements.
As an employer, I can say "hell, yes". I'd hire Cinege, Garofolo and Penn long before I'd hire a simpering running dog lackey of murdering fascists such as you. I'm sure you'd rat your grandma to the Red Guards. Cinege would have the backbone to cap a few before they took him down.
> "The Oklahoma City Federal building bombing - > Americas first response to government abuse"
Interesting. I'll have to re-read his rant now, because anyone who can make such a clear-sighted statement must be much more wise and clever than I thought him to be after first reading about the closure of the LRP.
It was erroneous. "Troll" is a value judgement, and probably not relevant.
It was erroneous in that he asserted that if you release your code under the GPL you thereby lose control of it, which is patently false. You can do whatever you like with it, including releasing binaries for which no source is provided: You are the owner of the copyright and may license the code under any terms that you wish.
It is not releasing the source under the GPL that causes loss of control -- in fact releasing under the GPL is a means of exercising control over the licensees to prevent them from redistributing derived works without including the source code. What causes a loss of control is the very act of release. The GPL only mitigates that loss.
Please don't overlook the fact that the GPL does not require the author to distribute any source code. It only requires people who *recieve* the author's source code under its terms to redistribute that source code (and any instrumental modifications) on request if they distribute a binary derivative.
Slashdot Mirror
Bad? You must be French. Where I come from,
language serves people. I just *know* there's
a "Soviet Russia" joke in there somewhere.
Now I can understand why one would want, say, a
media player, or an internet exploder, but unless
I was on a safari, why would I want a panther
finder at all, leave alone care about the
texture of it's metallic finish?
... faster and cheaper ...
Except, of course, for Apples: Although they do
certainly get faster, they never seem to get
cheaper.
Compare this with a dual Opteron, via pricewatch.com.
I think you meant "father, mother, and father's
*ahem* friend".
If you're not using it any more, I'll take that abacus, as knotting these cords is starting to give me blisters.
"Capitalism" doesn't care if they fail or,
alternatively, reform and whoop Asia's butt.
There's no organization so screwed up that
a revolution can't fix it.
This is true. Look at the content of the updates.
In the MS case, they are bug fixes, while in the
Apple case they are feature enhancements. Don't
believe me, go look for yourself.
Actually, you *can* redistribute Swing 1.1
independently.
SWT it hot stuff, but until JCP can push it into
the J2SE, it's not going to get the kind of
uptake that makes it a useful platform.
You forgot one: Delegates make it easier to
pretend you have multiple inheritance.
> he drew his criticism with his own radical statements
...huh?
This from the person who signs his posts with
> Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
But yeah, honesty is subversive, without a doubt.
filet mignon? you poor thing. I would choke on
anything so coarse. I can only eat beef if it is
grown in zero-g and raised on crocus stamens.
perrier is very harsh on the skin, unless it is
saturated with jamaican blue mountain, and frankly
even then it's too septic without some astringent
johnny walker blue label liberally admixed.
hey, you want quality thinking, you need quality fuel.
The issue is that the simple, cheap means of
converting hydrogen into electricity (so to
speak), namely the proton-exchange membrane,
requires a "reformer" to liberate the
hydrogen before it can be used. These reformers
tend to run hot (think "Reform School Girls"),
and nobody likes to drive a hydrogen-powered
pocket rocket that includes a blast-furnace.
Oh, but I heard that unicorns can also be attracted
by the swarthy scent of Iraqi weapons of mass
decept^H^H^H^Hstruction.
Freeze it. Those little fuckers aren't going anywhere at 0.1K.
Essentially anything with hydrogen or carbon in it
is flammable in a sufficiently oxygen-rich
atmosphere at sufficiently high temperature.
In air, pretty much everything you are wearing
is considerably more flammable than diesel.
You are simply wrong about the Hindenburg.
Hydrogen-oxygen flames are essentially invisible.
Look at photos of the Hindenberg disaster. Those
blinding yellow-orange flames are aluminum oxide
in the paint covering the canvas burning like,
well, an incindiary -- since that's what it is.
Hell, the damn thing was dipped in rocket fuel.
> Scientists also said that transporting hydrogen
> from fossil fuel plants to automobile filling
> stations will be more difficult than anyone has
> anticipated.
Even more difficult than the "Scientists" who
said this anticipated?! Wow, that's really
difficult.
Yeah, the free market is like simulated annealling,
while government intervention is like conjugate
gradient, with bribery.
Here's what really piques my ire about this
thread: Cinege's critics are essentially
demonizing stalkers who raise irrelevancies
in order to conduct ad hominem attacks.
He could be Jeffrey Dahmer in drag or the
last remaining clone of der Fuhrer, and it
wouldn't make one bit of difference relative
to the truth or falsity of his statements.
I didn't sign your social contract, nor contract
your social disease, so you can flip off, Mussolini.
The really pathetic aspect to this irrelevant thread
is that I'm the one who will get the Troll mods.
What a bunch of losers.
As an employer, I can say "hell, yes". I'd hire
Cinege, Garofolo and Penn long before I'd hire a
simpering running dog lackey of murdering fascists
such as you. I'm sure you'd rat your grandma to
the Red Guards. Cinege would have the backbone to
cap a few before they took him down.
> "The Oklahoma City Federal building bombing -
> Americas first response to government abuse"
Interesting. I'll have to re-read his rant now,
because anyone who can make such a clear-sighted
statement must be much more wise and clever than
I thought him to be after first reading about the
closure of the LRP.
> such is life in the free market
I think his point is that the free market,
without any sort of mitigating organization,
sucks.
It was erroneous. "Troll" is a value judgement,
and probably not relevant.
It was erroneous in that he asserted that if you
release your code under the GPL you thereby
lose control of it, which is patently false.
You can do whatever you like with it, including
releasing binaries for which no source is
provided: You are the owner of the copyright
and may license the code under any terms that
you wish.
It is not releasing the source under the GPL
that causes loss of control -- in fact releasing
under the GPL is a means of exercising control
over the licensees to prevent them from
redistributing derived works without including
the source code. What causes a loss of control
is the very act of release. The GPL only
mitigates that loss.
Please don't overlook the fact that the GPL
does not require the author to distribute any
source code. It only requires people who
*recieve* the author's source code under its
terms to redistribute that source code (and
any instrumental modifications) on request
if they distribute a binary derivative.