Slashdot Mirror


Jaguar is Over

Steve Jobs announced the end of Jaguar, and the newness of Panther, today at his WWDC keynote address. Panther is to be available as a preview release now, and by the end of the year retail, for $129. Mac OS X 10.3 / Panther has 100 major new features, according to Jobs. Lower-level enhancements include NFS file locking, built-in X11, FreeBSD 5.0, IPsec-based VPN, and various SMB and Active Directory enhancements.

The Panther Finder is brand-new, with a new brushed metal appearance, and enhanced column view, with the items used most commonly in the far left column. Searching is "live" and a lot faster, and is more user-centric instead of computer-centric.

The Finder now has labels, and icons can resize with window resizing.

The iDisk now caches itself locally, so it can be used offline, and the user can copy to and from it more efficiently (with the real copies happening in the background).

A new feature called Expose allows minimizing into a smaller window, all open windows, to temporarily move everything out of the way, sort of like workspaces.

File Vault can encrypt a user directory and decrypt it "on the fly."

Faxing is now built-in, and available system-wide.

Pixlet is a new compression codec that does video compression without noticable artifacts, for 48 bits per pixel: at 960x540 and 24 fps, can be decoded on a 1GHz Power Mac.

Preview is significantly faster, with searching, and PS to PDF conversion.

Panther features fast user switching, a feature in Windows XP, allowing under-one-second (on the demo machine) switching between two different users.

FontBook is a new "pro" app for font management.

iChat AV is an update to iChat that does audio and video conferencing in addition to text, that works with any built-in or USB mic, and any DV video camera, connecting using only a user's screen name. It is going to beta today, and will be included in Panther, and will be sold for $29 to Jaguar users. Apple will sell iSight for $149, a small camera that does audio and video over FireWire.

Apple is preparing a new set of developer tools called XCode, which works with GCC 3.3, does distributed compiles (using available resources on the network), and has other cool stuff. It is fast, it has improved searching (like the Finder, and over entire projects), and it looks like an iApp (though it isn't metal). It removes the need to link; onnly link objects you need to launch. It starts compiling while you are editing, cutting the time you need to compile drastically. It can modify the program while it is running.

835 comments

  1. Had to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jaguar is dead? Hmmm, I figured it would have nine lives.

    1. Re:Had to say it... by Zane+Edwards · · Score: 1

      Yeah, puma, cheetah, jaguar and now panther...5 more to go.

    2. Re:Had to say it... by yroJJory · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jaguar had 10.2.6 lives.

      --
      Jory
    3. Re:Had to say it... by bludstone · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was a crappy system anyways. I dont know what Atari was thinking.

      Didnt have any worthwhile games anyways. :)

      --

      no .sig
    4. Re:Had to say it... by Gatton · · Score: 1

      At least it wasn't beleaguered.

    5. Re:Had to say it... by Joseph+Wharton · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Two words: Tempest 2000

      And it did have the best version of Doom, as far as consoles go.

      --
      Quality or Quantity, don't tell me they're the same.
    6. Re:Had to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Alien Vs. Predator was awesome for 1994...

    7. Re:Had to say it... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Nah, Aliens vs. Predator was pretty damn cool, and graphically impressive for the time.

    8. Re:Had to say it... by Cyclopedian · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      While the system was crappy due to the lack of strong third-party support, there were some good games.

      One game, I would rate as excellent and quite possibly the best of the Jaguar's lineup: Aliens Vs Predator.

      Now, THAT was a great game! If you played the Colonial Marine, the atmosphere of the corridors was eerily silent and you heard nothing more than your footsteps, the radar pings, the air ducts, and the occasional alien scream far off in the distance. I had tons of fun playing that character.

      You also could play the Predator, and the Alien as well. The Predator was tons of fun too, with its invisibility technology, and the visible/infrared/uv/x-ray viewer. I didn't like playing the Alien that much, mostly because it didn't feel all that pleasant that I was part of the hive and was just one of many.

      Ahh...time for me to stop reminescing and to get back to work...*loads Strongbad email*

      -Cyc

    9. Re:Had to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it were reet shite. Better off playing Tempest on Mame, for free. Tempest 2000 offered nothing over and above that.

      Jaguar - three words. Curse. Of. Minter. Jesus, the guy spends half his life going on about Defender, then goes and writes a conversion and leaves of Hyperspace!!

    10. Re:Had to say it... by Vegan+Pagan · · Score: 1

      Quite right. So why are they re-releasing Panther now? It was no more powerful than Gameboy Advance!

    11. Re:Had to say it... by yroJJory · · Score: 1

      I couldn't have put it better myself!

      Would that be CuntXP Home Edition?

      --
      Jory
    12. Re:Had to say it... by lightspawn · · Score: 1

      -1 offtopic? I'd accept a "redundant" rating since there was an earlier post saying essentially the same thing, but not an "offtopic" - it seems some people didn't get the "funny" part of the comment I was replying to. Ugh.

    13. Re:Had to say it... by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      That's the Lynx, silly.

  2. What no 970 by stanmann · · Score: 1

    I was really hoping for the 970. Well, at least we get a new version of OSX. And it has a cool new name too.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    1. Re:What no 970 by 0000+0111 · · Score: 1

      It's not over yet.

    2. Re:What no 970 by wezelboy · · Score: 1

      Jobs is still talking.... any minute now he'll spill the beans.

    3. Re:What no 970 by Basehart · · Score: 1

      Patience glasshopper

    4. Re:What no 970 by thesatirist · · Score: 1

      macobserver's live feed is reporting that the specs leaked from the store were accurate.

    5. Re:What no 970 by Rexifer · · Score: 1

      If you're reading the live commentary, there's an interesting quote:

      * Jobs says "Maybe some of you noticed something on the Net ... funny thing happened on our Web site. Premature specification. It was a mistake, and it is true."

    6. Re:What no 970 by killmenow · · Score: 3, Funny

      I never knew Jobs suffered from Premature Specification!

    7. Re:What no 970 by Black-Man · · Score: 1

      Some of us recent purchasers of Power Macs actually breathed a sigh of relief.

  3. must have by susehat · · Score: 0, Troll

    Must Have. Must get NeXTSTEP 7.0 Panther.

  4. Jaguar is dead... by goldspider · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...but did Netcraft confirm it?

    I'm sorry, but someone had to say it!

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Jaguar is dead... by Smitty825 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but the number of posts regarding Jaguar has died on the newsgroups...it's just a logical conclusion. (Wasn't Jaguar related to a *BSD anyway?) :-)

      --

      Doh!
    2. Re:Jaguar is dead... by tarius8105 · · Score: 1

      BSD is not dead...Its just resting peacefully... Nah but seriously, if you look at what Apache.org is running they pretty much are owned by FreeBSD, and netcraft apparently has the longest uptime average and BSD/OS and FreeBSD won it hands down (considering out of all OSs out there those two are the only ones listed). Not to mention Netcraft runs bsd :)

  5. Simply Amazing by jimmy_dean · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Simply amazing, I love it. Can't wait until I can afford to buy a Mac (after the college bills stop happening).

    --
    -> Sometimes, you just gotta break free from the shackles of proprietary code.
    1. Re:Simply Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I ask you what was so amazing in that list above? I read through it and couldn't help buy yawn.

    2. Re:Simply Amazing by bahamat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Simply amazing, I love it. Can't wait until I can afford to buy a Mac (after the college bills stop happening).
      -> Sometimes, you just gotta break free from the shackles of proprietary code.


      What an odd mix, your post directly contradicts your sig. Rarely have I seen such blatant foolery.

    3. Re:Simply Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he does say "sometimes". Guess not in this case.

  6. The nicest Unix front-end ever? by ites · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1. Make pretty GUIs and lovely gadgets 2. ??? 3. Profit!!! Actually, it's a pretty damn good business plan.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:The nicest Unix front-end ever? by GrandCow · · Score: 1

      1. Make pretty GUIs and lovely gadgets 2. ??? 3. Profit!!! Actually, it's a pretty damn good business plan.


      How bout: 2. Lots of people buy it

      I think we have a winner.

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
    2. Re:The nicest Unix front-end ever? by greenskyx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think step 2 would be "sell them to consumers" :P

    3. Re:The nicest Unix front-end ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "1. Make pretty GUIs and lovely gadgets 2. ??? 3. Profit!!! Actually, it's a pretty damn good business plan."

      Step 2: See Step 3

    4. Re:The nicest Unix front-end ever? by bobdotorg · · Score: 4, Funny

      1. Make pretty GUIs and lovely gadgets 2. ??? 3. Profit!!! Actually, it's a pretty damn good business plan.

      No No No....

      1. Make pretty GUIs and lovely gadgets

      2. Profit!!!

      3. There is no Step Three!!! There is no Step Three!!!

      I'm here at the Glendale Apple Store watching the Stevenote, and all I can say is, "Holy Crap. No, really. Holy crap."

      He's just about to do the spec test of the new G5 vs. Dell's bst offering. Again, Holy floating point performance Batman.

      --
      __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    5. Re:The nicest Unix front-end ever? by 56ker · · Score: 1

      It's not just selling them to consumers - it's selling them to the "right" consumers - eg buyers for government, big business etc. Unfortunately the world has heard of Microsoft - but Apple in many people's books remains an unknown quantity...

    6. Re:The nicest Unix front-end ever? by darkov · · Score: 1

      1. Make pretty GUIs and lovely gadgets

      2. Leverage twenty year old OS with full range of apps supported, photoshop, ms office, ...

      3. [...]

      4. Profit!!! Well, sort of, lose money now and then, get dragged down by tech slump...

    7. Re:The nicest Unix front-end ever? by jbr439 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't you mean "The nicest SCO OS front-end ever" ? :-)

    8. Re:The nicest Unix front-end ever? by BlaKnail · · Score: 1

      step 2 = users shit in their pants.

    9. Re:The nicest Unix front-end ever? by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

      Moderators, mod up parent insightful. Apple are setting the standard for beautiful GUIs running over Unix. This is worth saying again... Unix is prettier than Windows.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
    10. Re:The nicest Unix front-end ever? by MrChuck · · Score: 0, Troll
      I think step 2 would be "sell them to consumers" :P

      You'd think so, but then you'd be showing that you hadn't followed Steve's plans when he was at NeXT ("for only $10,000 - we'll sell them to students!").

      Just went with the nephew and got a Compaq Laptop for Linux and Windows-Gaming use for $1300. Same specs of machine for Apple was around $2300. You convince a 21 year old blowing his hard earned cash on a laptop that he should spend an extra $1k to run Apple.

  7. Damn, I need new hardware for first post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Darn it! I was hoping to be able to buy a new 970-based PowerMac to be able to get first post faster!

  8. Only about half-way through keynote by nether · · Score: 1

    So we haven't even gotten to the "There's one more thing ...."

    1. Re:Only about half-way through keynote by Golias · · Score: 2, Informative
      So we haven't even gotten to the "There's one more thing ...."

      We have now. He admitted that the leaked dual-970 info was true.

      In other big news, Safari goes 1.0!!! (Available for download in a few hours.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  9. Had to be first, didn't you? by DAQ42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dude, the keynote isn't even over yet, and you're posting to the site about the news. Geez, talk about jumping the gun...

    --
    Don't Ask Questions. I don't know the answers and even if I did I wouldn't tell you.
    1. Re:Had to be first, didn't you? by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      Dude, the keynote isn't even over yet, and you're posting to the site about the news. Geez, talk about jumping the gun...

      The real mac news sites were posting live updates even before it started. Slashdot is nowhere near being first with the news.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    2. Re:Had to be first, didn't you? by guido1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude, the keynote isn't even over yet, and you're posting to the site about the news. Geez, talk about jumping the gun...

      So if they post stories too slowly... We get "This site is crap. I read about this at Wired/CNN/Blah 2 days/weeks/months ago!"

      But if they post news while it's happening, there are complaints about that too? /me ponders if people enjoy complaining too much.

    3. Re:Had to be first, didn't you? by mbourgon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hell, several sites are doing running updates. Updates every minute or so. I wish Slashdot was doing that, actually, as all the other sites are, um, "slashdotted".

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    4. Re:Had to be first, didn't you? by DAQ42 · · Score: 1

      Um doofbunny, the freaking announcements aren't even over yet. The hardware hadn't even been announced when this story was up on the front page. That's lame. That's called not getting the whole story. That's called whatever you want to call it but it's just slack.

      --
      Don't Ask Questions. I don't know the answers and even if I did I wouldn't tell you.
    5. Re:Had to be first, didn't you? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      No, they were Macdotted.

      --

      mbbac

  10. Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by dochood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ugh!

    Another upgrade! I just bought Jaguar for one machine about two months ago!

    Got to do it, though.... too much cool stuff in Panther to just pass by.

    dochood

  11. wheres the G5's by Cromulent · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I want them now so I can get one!

    --
    drug law enforcement is modern day witch hunting.
  12. FreeBSD 5.0 as a lower-level enhancement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Per above "Lower-level enhancements include NFS file locking, built-in X11, FreeBSD 5.0, " Now that is what I call an enhancement! Running an OS inside an OS, hummmm emulation?

    1. Re:FreeBSD 5.0 as a lower-level enhancement? by dochood · · Score: 1

      Don't they mean the new version is BASED on 5.0...? It was an earlier version before (4.7? 4.8?)

      dochood

    2. Re:FreeBSD 5.0 as a lower-level enhancement? by Jay+Cornwall · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I sincerely hope they didn't. FreeBSD 5.0 was not a production release, it was meant for early adopters only. 5.0 contained many serious bugs which have since been fixed in the 5.x tree (for example, the new DevFS system was still causing kernel panics in many core drivers at the time of release, one of which I fixed myself), and there are still more left to squash. I wonder what the reasoning behind this move was?

    3. Re:FreeBSD 5.0 as a lower-level enhancement? by warpmoon · · Score: 1

      It's FreeBSD 4.4 in Jaguar.

    4. Re:FreeBSD 5.0 as a lower-level enhancement? by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      Not emmulation anymore than it currently being built off of FreeBSD 4.4 is--it is built on top of it, there is no emmulation involved.

      That being said, I suspect the same way they mean "low level" the same way assembly is "low level"--it does *not* mean less significant, it means something to the effect of "closer to the core."

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    5. Re:FreeBSD 5.0 as a lower-level enhancement? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Darwin = FreeBSD with the kernel replaced by Mach and with a bunch of NeXTish and Appleish stuff piled on top.

    6. Re:FreeBSD 5.0 as a lower-level enhancement? by mattsucks · · Score: 1

      Running an OS inside an OS, hummmm emulation

      Like a Matrix within a Matrix?

      Steve == Neo ? I mean, he always wear a black turtleneck ... hmmm ...

    7. Re:FreeBSD 5.0 as a lower-level enhancement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Darwin = FreeBSD with the kernel replaced by Mach and with a bunch of NeXTish and Appleish stuff piled on top.


      So you're saying, Darwin is FreeBSD only everything is different?

  13. blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blah

  14. Uhm... by Daath · · Score: 1, Funny

    Jaguar is renamed to Panther Full Speed, Panther is now called Panther High Speed - It was coded by Incas, what do you expect.
    Ok, that was quite bad.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:Uhm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, that's pretty lame. There'll be another story coming along soon about new hardware -- why don't you prepare a less lame witticism in advance?

  15. XCode by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 1

    Will there be a titilating IDE to go with it? Hmmm, that's good squishy!

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
    1. Re:XCode by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Will there be a titilating IDE to go with it?

      Yes, it has a predictive compiler; compiles as you write. The demoed compile was ~ 10x faster (they also did away with linking somehow).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:XCode by Surak · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ahem. Works with GCC 3.3? That's GNU/XCode!

      -- Richard Stallman

    3. Re:XCode by jonadab · · Score: 1

      That would be redundant. The G in gcc is the Gnu, so expressly
      mentioning GCC covers the bases, albeit in an abbreviated fashion.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    4. Re:XCode by Daleks · · Score: 1

      Yes, it has a predictive compiler; compiles as you write.

      How does it apply optimizations then? A compile-as-you-write compiler would be about as efficient as interpreting code in-place, which sucks. There must be some recompilation done later on or it compiles code in compilation units that aren't currently being modified, possibly the CU's that are the oldest in terms of last modified time.

  16. WWDC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    WWDC? What's that? Wil Wheaton Dot Com?

    1. Re:WWDC by ceswiedler · · Score: 1

      No, its 'What Would the Devil Do?'

    2. Re:WWDC by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Or WWDC FM, Washington.

      That's DC-101: Howard Stern's old stomping grounds.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    3. Re:WWDC by azaroth42 · · Score: 1

      No no:

      What Would Daemon Choose?

      (It is BSD after all)

      --Azaroth

    4. Re:WWDC by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      Man is the animal that laughs.


      Wouldn't that be the hyena? (aka MacOS/X 10.5?)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  17. Can you imagine. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nevermind..

  18. Apple Store by nightsweat · · Score: 1
    Has a message on the site -

    "We are busy updating our store and will be back within the hour."

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  19. Very Impressive by ajiva · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OSX is definitly very, very impressive. With regular updates (every ~6-9months), Apple will be so far ahead before Longhorn comes out, that MS might actually have to try to compete! All I can say is that as a long time PC fan, way to go Apple

    1. Re:Very Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah but Apple users are paying for each upgrade. At least M$ does a few service packs for free before they ask for more money with a new OS. This is the second upgrade Apple users have had in the past 2 years?

    2. Re:Very Impressive by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      With regular updates (every ~6-9months), Apple will be so far ahead before Longhorn comes out, that MS might actually have to try to compete!

      And Apple owners' pocketbooks will be so much more empty. I'm impressed with Apple's technology, but the repeated paid upgrades are sort of extreme.

    3. Re:Very Impressive by SirSlud · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Service packs dont introduce the kind of features Apple's updates do.

      Service Packs are 99% bug fixes. Something that should have been fixed before you got the product.

      I'm out of the Apple loop these days, but surely Apple produces free patches between OS point releases?

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    4. Re:Very Impressive by owlicks58 · · Score: 1

      10.2 (Jaguar) was an upgrade that cost money, along with that came 10.2.1, 10.2.3. 10.2.4, and 10.2.6 Those were all free. 10.3 is a system overhaul with a host of new features. Would it make you feel better if they called it Mac OS X 2004? The number is irellevant, it's like going from Windows ME to Win XP. And finally, if you don't want to pay money you don't HAVE to upgrade.

      --
      -Alex
    5. RE: Very Impressive by blaarg · · Score: 1

      MS does charge for feature upgrades between major versions. However, they're called Plus! packs, and cost about 100 less than Apple's upgrades.

      Personally, I'd rather pay 30 than 130. But that's just me.

    6. Re:Very Impressive by RocketScientist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah. Because, you know, Apple never puts out service packs. Let's see....I'm running OS X version 10.2.6. That'd be 6--count 'em--6 major upgrade points since release, plus security updates periodically. That averages out to one every couple of months. Windows 2000, on the other hand, is up to a whopping service pack 4 and it's been out for nearly 3 years. And it's probably needed more service packs than that. Last time I did an install of Win2k I spent more time downloading patches than I spent installing the OS. If they'd roll them into SP's more often it would take me less time to get boxes up and running.

      I'm more concerned on my MS boxes that MS only puts out one paid upgrade every 3-5 years. What's wrong with their R&D that it takes 3 to 5 years to put out an upgrade of any significance. I remember in the NT 3.5/3.51 days that MS said they'd be on an annual OS update schedule. That sure didn't last long.

    7. Re:Very Impressive by bursch-X · · Score: 1, Redundant

      10.1 was free.
      10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, 10.1.5 were free.

      10.2 wasn't free

      Let's see. 10.2.1, 10.2.2, 10.2.3, 10.2.4, 10.2.5, 10.2.6 were all free.

      We pay for every upgrade? Sure.

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    8. Re:Very Impressive by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Let's see....I'm running OS X version 10.2.6. That'd be 6--count 'em--6 major upgrade points since release, plus security updates periodically.

      "Major upgrade points"? Try Minor upgrade points.

      I'm running Linux 2.4.22, is that 22 major upgrades since the release of 2.4?

    9. Re:Very Impressive by EricX2 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised people are now complaining about the lack of Microsoft selling upgrades... I've never heard that before. I thought they were so bad because they made you upgrade so often.

    10. Re: Very Impressive by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      Personally, I'd rather pay 30 than 130. But that's just me.


      Personally, I'd rather be using an OS that doesn't suck. It only takes a little bit of suckage to waste $100 worth of my time...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    11. Re:Very Impressive by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      Why the hell did this get modded to 5 Interesting? Is an unfounded "OS X will be better than everything!" all it takes?

    12. Re:Very Impressive by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      When Microsoft releases 4 service packs, it's because Windows XP is buggy. When Apple releases 6, it's because Apple is being attentive and caring.

    13. Re:Very Impressive by Jayzz · · Score: 1

      1. You don't have to pay for every update, only the major release like Jaguar and Panther. And the cycle is more like a year and half between major releases. 2. Who forces you to buy every release? If you like Windows release schedule, just buy new MacOS only when new Windows version comes, that would solve your problem :)

    14. Re:Very Impressive by aminorex · · Score: 1

      This is true. Look at the content of the updates.
      In the MS case, they are bug fixes, while in the
      Apple case they are feature enhancements. Don't
      believe me, go look for yourself.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    15. Re:Very Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't a good comparison, considering that the Linux version number you're referring to is only the kernel version and the MacOS X version is the version number of the entire distribution.

    16. Re:Very Impressive by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      I'm more concerned on my MS boxes that MS only puts out one paid upgrade every 3-5 years. What's wrong with their R&D that it takes 3 to 5 years to put out an upgrade of any significance. I remember in the NT 3.5/3.51 days that MS said they'd be on an annual OS update schedule. That sure didn't last long.

      It's because they have the majority market share. They don't need to make the effort. Other companies who want to gain market share need to find ways to make their product more attractive. The market leader has enought inertia and market penetration to not need to do this.

      This is indicative of all markets not just IT and Microsoft.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    17. Re:Very Impressive by debugdave · · Score: 1

      Yes. Is there something wrong with that?

  20. Let me be the first to say... by jocknerd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What about an upgrade price for Panther? I just spent $129 last fall for Jaguar.

    1. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'll be getting my upgrade from Usenet if there's no upgrade price. I already overpaid for a laptop by $1,000, damned if they're getting another $129.

      ~~~

    2. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Drakonian · · Score: 2, Informative

      They announced it will be $129 and ship later in the year. No word if it comes free with new G5s yet.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    3. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so. Panther will be the first Apple OS to include product activation and Safedisc technology.

    4. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, good thing, no one's ever been able to get around those. *rolls eyes*

    5. Re:Let me be the first to say... by fliplap · · Score: 2, Funny

      Assuming this is true it will also be the first Apple OS to have those features forcably removed by crackers

    6. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      What about an upgrade price for Panther? I just spent $129 last fall for Jaguar.

      Look, here's the deal. If you want nice stuff you have to pay for it. That's just the way it is. If you're willing to settle for something else then sure, you can spend less money.

    7. Re:Let me be the first to say... by mrjohnson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is the upgrade price.

      Considering it's not possible to buy and Apple computer without X, how many people do you really think are doing new installs?

    8. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Uart · · Score: 1

      ... don't forget the $50 you paid for .Mac too. and the $100 they will expect you to pay to renew.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    9. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apt-get dist-upgrade

    10. Re:Let me be the first to say... by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 1

      No word if it comes free with new G5s yet.

      I would expect something similar to last summer where people who purchased Macs in the month or two before Jaguar were given rebates that let them buy Jaguar for $20 when it came out. However, it wouldn't surprise me in the least if Apple gave away Panther for free to G5 owners so they could show off the 64-bit OS on a 64-bit CPU.

    11. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Mongo · · Score: 1

      Technically the 129.00 price is the upgrade. Apple is a hardware company and every machine that you purchase from them has a version of Mac OS thus when you purchace a new version it is an upgrade. This is a significant upgrade from 10.2 and the cost is justified and in line with other venders prices, they just are improving it faster.

    12. Re:Let me be the first to say... by bellings · · Score: 1

      The upgrade price for Panther is $129. The non-upgrade price is... get ready... $0. It comes for free with new machines.

      Seriously, what are you asking? Do you have an Apple computer somewhere that doesn't already have an operating system license?

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    13. Re:Let me be the first to say... by jdennett · · Score: 1

      There's a world of difference between upgrading an old Mac from Mac OS 9 to 10.3 and spending a large chunk of cash _again_ if you recently handed over your hard-earned to upgrade from 9 to 10.2.

      That's why there ought to be a sane upgrade price for users of Mac OS X 10.x. They've already paid already paid for most of what's in 10.3.

    14. Re:Let me be the first to say... by bellings · · Score: 1

      Apple has decide there is a sane upgrade price for users of Mac OS X 10.x. The sane upgrade price they've decided on is $129.

      I imagine they could charge people with Mac OS 9 even more, but I understand why they're reluctant to do that. Doing that would be difficult, expensive to administer, and just cause resentment.

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    15. Re:Let me be the first to say... by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      They gave me upgrade coupons with my new machine. Here's seeing if they honor them this time.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    16. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Humpinate · · Score: 1

      No No NO.......What Steve Jobs got from the Gate-ster was not ONLY eleventy-million bucks,
      BUT also the tried and true business plan known well to all pushers......Hook 'em and then they'll pay ANYTHING to keep connected....
      TANSTAAFL
      (There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch)

    17. Re:Let me be the first to say... by jdennett · · Score: 1

      Saying that $129 is a reasonable (or sane) upgrade price from 10.2.6 to 10.3.0 does not make it so.

      You failed to address the points I raised, and then you claim that it would be difficult and expensive to administer to offer reduced pricing for smaller upgrades -- but they did just that for the step up to 10.1 from 10.0.

      So: explain to me why the upgrade from Mac OS 10.2.6 to 10.3.0 should cost as much as the upgrade from a completely different OS (Mac OS 9) to Mac OS 10.3. Explain why Apple would suddenly find it so troublesome to administer such a simple differentiated upgrade price.

      With Mac OS X, I gave Apple a chance; finally they released an early version of what could be a fine OS. As of yet, it's the least solid Unix-based platform I work with, but it does at least run Microsoft Word natively, and runs on nice hardware.

      Apple have effectively moved to a subscription model without mentioning it.

      Now, I wonder how the lawsuits against them for selling Jaguar as including the .Mac service and then withdrawing it are going along...

  21. Where are the G5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Where are the G5s?

    Once again, Apple has blew it.

    1. Re:Where are the G5? by Dan+Berlin · · Score: 1

      He's announcing them right now. If the submitter hadn't blew his load, it would have been one big story.

    2. Re:Where are the G5? by mkelley · · Score: 1

      You can read the timeline here. It's an IBM chip.

      --

      m.kelley
      life is like a freeway, if you don't look you could miss it.
    3. Re:Where are the G5? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      A little early there, tiger. The G5s are showing NOW.

    4. Re:Where are the G5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why don't you wait for him to finish TALKING before saying things like this, troll?

      Once again, you blew it.

    5. Re:Where are the G5? by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      In this case pudge was the defendant and the jury in the submission process. Are you inciting that slashdot submitters get off on apples? It is an interesting thought but not one I want to ponder on.

    6. Re:Where are the G5? by giminy · · Score: 1

      it's another apple marketing ploy. This way, they get another story on slashdot for the G5 announcement.

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  22. but does it play ogg??? by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    Damn big businesses and their $0.99 "marketing prices", don't even notice open projects.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
  23. Re:blowing your load early? by imadork · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Wanna wait for him to finish first?

    Of course not, this is slashdot, after all.

    And BTW, the lone gunmen died, in case you haven't heard yet...

  24. This will be another solid update by dtolton · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft should (but won't) take a page from Apple's book. You can as a company, co-exist peacefully with the Open Source community. Apple has put themselves in a great position IMO for the future. Their releases add actual features, making people *want* to upgrade instead of forcing them to. It's a beautiful thing, because you can still use OS 10.0 if you want to, but they add so many features, bells, whistles and in general cool stuff - people really want to get the newest version of their software.

    Kudos to Apple for that.

    --

    Doug Tolton

    "The destruction of a value which is, will not bring value to that which isn't." -John Galt
    1. Re:This will be another solid update by Blue+Lozenge · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's a beautiful thing, because you can still use OS 10.0 if you want to, but they add so many features, bells, whistles and in general cool stuff - people really want to get the newest version of their software.

      I wish it were that simple. If you want to run the latest applications, then no, you can't use OS 10.0. Most apps require 10.2, and almost all others require 10.1.

    2. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What has apple given back to the free software community?

    3. Re:This will be another solid update by cenobita · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, it totally rules to essentially try and take credit for work you didn't do.

      While I think it's cool that Apple is integrating things from BSD into their software, I think the FreeBSD team should get a HUGE nod of appreciation, publically, for all their hard work over the years. Amongst the Mac people I know, they've developed a bit of a "well, now I know UNIX! h4rdc0r3!" sensibility about Mac OS, but they attribute that strength and flexibility to Apple, while completely ignoring the fact that FreeBSD was and is a very capable, powerful OS developed by dedicated volunteers; not some corporate entity.

      Kudos to Apple for successfully doing it, but I say give fair credit where it's due.

    4. Re:This will be another solid update by Delphiki · · Score: 1

      Haha, I see this exact same message on just about every board about macs. Get a new post.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    5. Re:This will be another solid update by jlleblanc · · Score: 4, Informative
      What has apple given back to the free software community?

      Updates to the KHTML group for starters.

    6. Re:This will be another solid update by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Interesting. So what you're saying is that there's no compelling reason to upgrade from Windows 98 or ME to XP, but OS X to OS Whatever is an absolutely compelling upgrade?

      Or, to put it another way, how does Microsoft *force* users to upgrade while Apple *makes* them want to upgrade?

      I can understand gushing about new technology, but this "Apple can do no wrong" fetish is starting to get weird.

    7. Re:This will be another solid update by Nintendork · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Their releases add actual features, making people *want* to upgrade instead of forcing them to."

      Where do you see Microsoft forcing people to upgrade??? Where the hell does this common troll spew come from? Microsoft recycles their code, refining it and rewriting various parts with each new release of Windows. They add an array of new features that prior versions didn't have to provide incentive for current computer owners to upgrade. Apple and every other software vendor out there does the same thing.

      Personally, I see Apple forcing their users to upgrade since they don't make it simple for developers to write their code once and have it run on all their system versions. Microsoft releases updates for their old products for several years after they're released to ensure compatability. Heck, they just stopped producing updates to Windows 95 a year or two ago. Do you see Apple providing updates for System 7.5 anymore?

      I should also mention that I prefer the macintosh operating system for my own personal use. Fortunately, I don't let that preference clout my judgement.

      -Lucas

    8. Re:This will be another solid update by womby · · Score: 1

      not to dissagree pointlessly but
      that is not the fault of the OS that is the aplication developer. an aplication today can be made to run on OSX 10.0 and if it was built properly it _will_ run on 10.2 today and 10.3 later.

      and 10.1 was a (practicaly) free update I walked into my nearest apple dealer and I had a copy of 10.1

      --
      **** lying is wrong even for sleeping dogs
    9. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What have you given back to the free software community?

    10. Re:This will be another solid update by Otter · · Score: 3, Informative
      For the zillionth time -- MacOS X is not FreeBSD with a new window manager and desktop theme. It is a separate operating system, derived from the original BSD. Only a subset of the system utilities comes from FreeBSD.

      I know you've read here over and over that OS X is FreeBSD. It isn't.

    11. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft should (but won't) take a page from Apple's book.

      Could you imagine the wailing & nashing of teeth that would go on here if MS charged $130 for a service pack?

    12. Re:This will be another solid update by Zepalesque · · Score: 2, Informative

      >> Where do you see Microsoft forcing people to upgrade???

      How about their recent decision to release IE 7 only to Windows XP? Sounds like pretty hefty encouragement to me.

    13. Re:This will be another solid update by Drakonian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hmmm. I thought the whole point of open source was others should be able to incorporate your work into theirs. And now suddenly we are upset that a company is sucessfully doing it?

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    14. Re:This will be another solid update by hobbit · · Score: 1
      that is not the fault of the OS that is the aplication developer

      Most of the apps requiring 10.2 are the built-in ones (iChat, Safari, etc.)

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    15. Re:This will be another solid update by darkov · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it totally rules to essentially try and take credit for work you didn't do.

      Yeah, I've noticed how secretive Apple are about the open-source foundations of their system. They never mention that it's Unix and that it's BSD. Much like Linux, that stole all its ideas from Unix and them tried to pass it off as "not Unix".

      What would you actually like them, to say?

    16. Re:This will be another solid update by BitGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The idea that Apple hasn't given BSD credit is absurd.

      Hell, they're getting sued for having the "Based on unix" graphic on their pages!

      They have regularly acknowledged ths situation ,and given back by releasing darwin.

      The idea that all they are doing is selling other peoples improvementis is also absurd (its a troll really).

      They developed a really nice new IO system and released it into darwin, for instance, along with a thousand other things.

      And they develop useful apps and sell a OS that has features that Linux and BSD aren't matching yet-- they make money from the value add, while contributing back to the base open source OS.

      ITs a win-win business model.

      You guys need to get over your bitterness that someone somewhere is selling software and start being realistic.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    17. Re:This will be another solid update by cenobita · · Score: 1

      Did I say it was, or even indicate that? No.

      What I said was, Apple is using the FreeBSD name, and subsequent bits of technologies developed by them, to help itself. All i'm indicating is that they should give a public nod of, "Hey, thanks for putting our funding to good use and releasing some great software! It's a big help to us and is a good companion to our existing software!"

      It's that simple. Stop reading between the lines for things that aren't there and assuming that i'm bashing Apple or claiming that Mac OS is just FreeBSD with a coat of paint. Saying that is like claiming that because FreeBSD can emulate Linux apps, it's just Linux with a different style of arranging directories.

    18. Re:This will be another solid update by zojas · · Score: 1

      apple's kernel is really mach, there is just a bsd compatibility layer.

    19. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems more like a great reason to switch to Mozilla and its derivatives that to switch to XP. Let's see why: upgrade to XP is $200. New version of Mozilla: free (as in beer). This is why Linux Format gave Microsoft the Best Linux Advocate of the Year award recently :) They have done more to drive people to Linux than any other company out there.

    20. Re:This will be another solid update by prockcore · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Personally, I see Apple forcing their users to upgrade since they don't make it simple for developers to write their code once and have it run on all their system versions.

      Don't forget about all the software that requires 10.2, like Safari. Those of us who haven't spent the $130 for Jaguar can't run Safari... MS may be evil, but they never forced me to buy a new version of windows to get the latest web browser.

    21. Re:This will be another solid update by cenobita · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look, i'm not bashing Apple and saying that they've *stolen* anything. I'm not debating their contributions, either, because they've made some damned good ones.

      However, there is a very large misconception among CERTAIN MAC USERS (not ALL) that Mac OS is FreeBSD and FreeBSD is Mac OS; obviously, we all know this to be false, and we know that Apple doesn't believe it either.

      That said, there is a vast difference between giving back to the community, and giving a nod of appreciation that goes beyond a "Based on UNIX" or "Based on FreeBSD" graphic.

      I'm personally excited to see what Apple's going to be coming out with, but the reactionary attitude some of their users display is disgusting. Just because i'm mentioning Apple in a context that doesn't include giving a virtual handjob to Steve Jobs doesn't mean i'm bashing them.

      Having used FreeBSD for a couple years, though, I just think it'd be a nice gesture to say "thanks". Nothing more, nothing less.

    22. Re:This will be another solid update by Mikey-San · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're the troll, dork.

      7.5 is eight years old, and nowhere NEAR current. The difference between Apple and Microsoft is that in eight years, Apple's OS has matured far past the point of being noticeably different, while Microsoft /will always/ support eight-year-old OSes because they only release major updates every three years or so.

      Apple has released the following major updates since 1995:

      8.0
      8.1 (HFS+ introduction)
      8.5
      9
      X 10.0
      X 10.1
      X 10.2
      And later this year, X 10.3.

      Compare this to Microsoft:

      Win95
      Win98
      Win2000 (and ME in the same time period, with ME not really being "moving forward" by the accounts of ME users)
      WinXP

      Eight versus four. It's easy to support an OS that's eight years old if you've only released a few big revisions since then.

      I'll take "progress" for three hundred, Alex.

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    23. Re:This will be another solid update by oni · · Score: 1, Troll

      Where do you see Microsoft forcing people to upgrade???

      They do it by making new versions of software incompatible with older versions and refusing to sell the older versions. That means that if you have a company happily using, say, Office 97 and you need to buy some new computers, you have no choice but to get Office XP (or .NET or whatever it is these days). When you do that, you'll start having compatibility issues with the older stuff (office 97). The easy answer is to buy more copies of office 97 for the newer computers. I mean, if it has the features you want you should be able to buy it. But MS will not sell you licenses for it at any price. So, if you want to be productive, you have no choice but to upgrade everything to the latest version.

    24. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      MS may be evil, but they never forced me to buy a new version of windows to get the latest web browser.

      That is the new trend. Windows and Apple want you to have a recent OS to get the recent version of their browser. Remember, no more individual releases of IE. That has been in the news for the past month.

    25. Re:This will be another solid update by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Informative

      of course 10.1 is free if you have 10.0 thus there is no reason to use 10.1 still

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    26. Re:This will be another solid update by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Do you see Apple providing updates for System 7.5 anymore?
      No, but do you see Microsoft hosting a copy of Windows 95 on their FTP site?
    27. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why in fuck's name are you using netscape in OS X? just go get mozilla or *gasp* safari.

    28. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh because a new version of IE is really going to force somebody to upgrade. Take a look at google zeitgeist. IE 5 is still by far the dominant browser and Windows 98 is still the number one OS. That really sound like people forcibly upgrading.

    29. Re:This will be another solid update by cenobita · · Score: 1

      And if you'll look back, I distinctly mention that they should be applauded for their efforts. I'm not upset that they've done it at all.

      I was merely noting the confusion that i've observed in some Mac OS users that I know between the two, and feel that there should be a more specific line drawn for these people to differentiate the two. A public "good job!" seems like a good way to do this, along with a link to the FreeBSD website.

      Go to the Mac OS X tab on Apple's website and tell me how quickly it takes you to find anything that mentions and links to any of the currently active BSD projects. Looking at the page as it's currently written, it seems as though it'd be pretty easy to neglect the efforts of those groups.

    30. Re:This will be another solid update by jo42 · · Score: 1

      > how secretive Apple are about the open-source foundations

      Eh? Color me white and call me yankee, but how 'secretive' is it to release the core of OS X, as in Drawin and OpenDarwin???

    31. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa. A troll calling another person a troll. You seem to have no problem breaking up Mac OS by small subversions but you have a hard time recalling all of the Microsoft OS's. Here is the complete Microsoft list using the same criteria as your Mac list:

      WIndows 95
      Windows NT 3.51
      Windows NT 4
      Windows 98
      Windows 98SE
      Windows ME
      Windows 2000
      Windows XP

    32. Re:This will be another solid update by cenobita · · Score: 1

      Actually, I didn't know that. Thanks for the info!

      This does, however, somewhat touch on the point I was trying to make: give credit where it's due. Up until your comment, I hadn't seen *anything* that would indicate what you've mentioned.

    33. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked on OS 7.5. I can tell you that they could not pay me to run that piece of crap. Windows 95, as bad as it was, at least let me go one day without restarting. 7.5 was an absolute nightmare and I worked for two different companies that made the switch from Mac to PC just to get away from it. Of course, back then NT 4 was the most solid OS available. Too bad it didn't play any games except for Diablo.

    34. Re:This will be another solid update by tgibbs · · Score: 1
      Don't forget about all the software that requires 10.2, like Safari. Those of us who haven't spent the $130 for Jaguar can't run Safari
      Yes, that is the point. The incentive to buy the latest OS is to obtain new features from Apple, like Safari. But aside from Apple's software that is linked to new OS editions, there is very little that requires 10.2. For example, you don't need 10.2 to run the latest versions of Camino or Mozilla, because Apple does indeed make it simple for developers to write their code once and have it run on all their system versions. Apple has been remarkably good about this. Very little application software has broken over the years (utilities, which are heavily tied to system specifics, tend to be another matter). Indeed, most application software from system 6, which ran on an entirely different processor, still runs fine under OSX.
    35. Re:This will be another solid update by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny
      I can understand gushing about new technology, but this "Apple can do no wrong" fetish is starting to get weird.

      Umm, no actually Apple can do no wrong. You see it 's a feature of the Steve Jobs Reality Distortion Field, and since Apple own the patent on it then Microsoft can't copy it. The 'Dance Monkeyboy Dance' video was an example of what happens when they try to implement a similar technology without infringing any patents. As you can see, the Steve Ballmer Reality Distortion Field is not nearly as effective.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    36. Re:This will be another solid update by Spunk · · Score: 1

      IE 6 has been on top for about a year now. Look at the graph!

    37. Re:This will be another solid update by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      I agree -- it locked up hard and fast... I still find it funny that they host a copy online though. :^)

    38. Re:This will be another solid update by *weasel · · Score: 1

      lets be fair, if you're counting 10.0, 10.1, 10.2, 10.3 (not even out yet) individually then you really ought to mention 95 osr 1 and osr 2 (the release that made 95 usable), 98 se (still clinging on as the gamer OS of choice for people with dos games), and 2003. ME admittedly can't count as it made less forward movement than 95-osr1.

      besides all that - output doesn't dictate whether users -want- or are -forced- to upgrade.
      i would imagine that apple has limited support for
      os8 just as MS has limited support for its old OSs.

      it's the way software is done. stuff gets old, you can't afford to support it or extend it forever. you establish a workaround, or track down the root of a problem - but coding a fix? making all new versions of your software work on the old OSs? it's not feasible, and it certainly isn't what consumers are willing to pay for.

      MS doesn't force people to upgrade. it can't. no software company can.

      the main difference is in viewpoint, as macolytes love to see their david fight goliath, and the winfidels have come to accept the image of MS as 'bad guy' and so feel put upon to buy new software.

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    39. Re:This will be another solid update by kwerle · · Score: 1

      When they brag about the new OS features, what do they say?

      Based on FBSD 5.0

      What more do you want?

    40. Re:This will be another solid update by zojas · · Score: 2, Informative
      good point.

      I just finished porting lavaps to Mac OS X, and almost all the system calls I had to make to get the info about running processes were mach system calls. I only used one bsd system call (sysctl), around 6 mach calls I think.

    41. Re:This will be another solid update by cenobita · · Score: 1

      Well, i'd like to not be unemployed anymore. *cough*

      But, as it relates to the topic at hand, how many people will actually see that specs list? It's certainly not mentioned on their website (unless they just updated since I last hit refresh), nor is there any kind of link provided for users who might want to check out the project in more detail.

    42. Re:This will be another solid update by shking · · Score: 2, Informative

      WTF? Speaking of Troll-spew...

      [Apple] don't make it simple for developers to write their code once and have it run on all their system versions

      Of course Apple makes it easy!

      Write a Carbon app instead of a Cocoa app and it will run on every MacOS from 8.1 thru X. If you want your app to run on every mac every made, you build a classic "fat binary".

      --
      -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
    43. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac with Panther preview (a 8600/300 w/64 Megs of RAM)

      I'm no expert on Macs, but I'd say that maybe this is your problem. Kinda like running WindowsXP on a PII-300 with 64MB.

      Just a theory...you fucking troll.

    44. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude you're right. I am totally color blind. My point still stands though.

    45. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody has any obligation whatsoever to give anything back to the Free Software community. That's part of it's being Free Software.

      That said, Apple has given back all improvements that they have made from Free Software projects (KHTML, others), and most of what they have from non-Free APSL projects (Darwin).

    46. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is every mac addict a total bullshit artist? Firsr of all you can buy computers without Office installed and install whatever version you have a license for (and most companies have site licenses that more than cover the new computers). Second Office XP and Office 97 have the same file format. You can exchange files between users without any significant issue.

      We have been using Office 2000 on Windows 2000 for two years here and we have felt no great urge to upgrade. We all got new PC's but still with Windows 2000 and Office 2000.

      Can you come up with any more FUD? I wish for once people could just stick to facts instead of making them up to serve their argument.

    47. Re:This will be another solid update by Tack · · Score: 2, Informative
      My little iMac can encode MPEG4 video in realtime. Show me an x86 that can do that. Or, shut up about x86 performance.

      My x86 PC does that trivially. It's a 2-year-old Athlon 1400. I record TV realtime in mpeg4 (2500kbit) and mp3 (160kbit) with 30-40% CPU to spare.

      Jason.

    48. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have that copy of 7.5 because it's the last verson that is completely backwards compatable. If you wanna upgrade your ancient Mac, you don't have to search far and wide. Also, you can use it with Mac emulators, though then you have to search far and wide for ROM images to boot the damn thing :(

    49. Re:This will be another solid update by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Where do you see Microsoft forcing people to upgrade???

      You're right, they don't. Just this morning I went to the dealership to pick up the car I had in for service. While they were printing the bill their computer crashed. When they rebooted I saw that it was running Windows 95.

    50. Re:This will be another solid update by Otter · · Score: 1
      Did I say it was, or even indicate that? No.

      Excuse me?

      Yeah, it totally rules to essentially try and take credit for work you didn't do...Amongst the Mac people I know, they've developed a bit of a "well, now I know UNIX! h4rdc0r3!" sensibility about Mac OS, but they attribute that strength and flexibility to Apple, while completely ignoring the fact that FreeBSD was and is a very capable, powerful OS developed by dedicated volunteers; not some corporate entity.

      It's obvious from that post and your follow-ups that you don't have the slightest understanding of the relationship between MacOS X, FreeBSD and other free projects (GNU, Samba, Apache, OpenSSL).

    51. Re:This will be another solid update by cenobita · · Score: 1

      Which is in reference to Mac USERS that i've spoken with. This is in no way a reflection of Apple or my perceptions about Apple, FreeBSD, or "other gnu projects".

    52. Re:This will be another solid update by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny
      ...they never forced me to buy a new version of windows to get the latest web browser.

      That's because their lastest web browser gives you the 'new' version of windows. Kind of like herpes: You can't get rid of it.

    53. Re:This will be another solid update by barzok · · Score: 1

      Really? IE 6 (MS's "latest" web browser) doesn't support Win95, forcing an upgrade.

    54. Re:This will be another solid update by Drakonian · · Score: 4, Informative
      Go to the Mac OS X tab on Apple's website and tell me how quickly it takes you to find anything that mentions and links to any of the currently active BSD projects. Looking at the page as it's currently written, it seems as though it'd be pretty easy to neglect the efforts of those groups.

      OK, let's be realistic. Mac OS X is a LOT more than just BSD. But the core of it, Darwin, is more based on BSD than any other part. So, I'll go to the Darwin page.

      It mentions, right on this front page:

      Darwin integrates a number of technologies, most importantly Mach 3.0, operating-system services based on 4.4BSD (Berkeley Software Distribution), high-performance networking facilities, and support for multiple integrated file systems..

      And if you go to the Darwin FAQ page. Quote:

      The BSD community has been extremely supportive of Apple since we first approached NetBSD, FreeBSD, and others about doing a better job of sharing code. That happened even before we announced Darwin. Now we're pleased to have become an even more active participant in the community.

      They don't link to the page, but they acknowledge the projects. Apple would prefer if you used Mac OS X over those other operating systems, because they are a corporation and they make money if you do so. However, there is no denying that the part of Mac OS X that is most heavily based on *BSD (Darwin) acknowledges it.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    55. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Could you imagine the wailing & nashing of teeth

      If you insist on using silly phrases like that, the least you could do is bother to spell them properly.

    56. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what tossers - making owners of an 8 year old OS to upgrade to get their latest browser! I hear it doesn't even run on DOS 4 either :(

      If only they were like Apple and made you pay $130 every year!

    57. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riiiight. So, you can run IE 6 under Windows 3.1? Uh huh.

      Dipsh|t.

    58. Re:This will be another solid update by cenobita · · Score: 1

      Which is something I was trying to get across, but maybe didn't explain too well. Nonetheless, you're correct about Darwin.

      Anyway, I hadn't seen the Darwin page yet (though I think I looked over it once when OS X first came about). In any case, I stand largely corrected! Kudos to you.

      To everyone else who still thinks i'm bashing Apple, though: take heart in the fact that after seeing the G5's, i'll likely be buying one for my audio work and day-to-day use. Better GUI, good speed. It also kills two birds with one stone, as I was considering for a long while to build one box for audio running Win2k and one running FreeBSD for day-to-day use.

      Now if only they'd bring Softimage|XSI over to Mac and improve support for high-end graphics cards, I could say byebye to Windows for good!

    59. Re:This will be another solid update by eganloo · · Score: 3, Informative

      MS may be evil, but they never forced me to buy a new version of windows to get the latest web browser.

      In case you haven't read month-old news, Microsoft announced it will no longer release standalone versions of Internet Explorer for old versions of Windows.

      Slashdot: IE6 SP1 Will Be Last Standalone Version

      If that is not forcing you "to buy a new version of Windows to get the latest web browser," then what is?

    60. Re:This will be another solid update by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      Riiiight. So, you can run IE 6 under Windows 3.1? Uh huh.

      Hmm. Well you can run IE5 under Windows 3.1 yes. Get it here. Let's face it, in terms of user experience, v5 and v6 aren't that different.

      I mean, Microsoft get backwards compatability dude. Win16 was an even more horrible API than Win32, I would not want to be the guy to backport the entirety of IE to Windows 3.1 - but they did it anyway.

      Regardless, this is offtopic. I think it's fair to roll a browser upgrade into the OS, after all it's not free to develop (despite using lots of free code). That doesn't necessarily make it good value though. I mean, NFS file locking is a "new feature"? A lot of stuff simply will not work without that, I'd call it a bugfix.

    61. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about bug fixes that aren't backported to the older releases, older games that broke with new releases, and new games that are broken on older releases? With a Windows 98 machine can play all your new games and get bug fixes as they come out, and that your Windows XP machine can play all your old games.

    62. Re:This will be another solid update by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      I forgot to link to the Darwin FAQ page if anyone is interested.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    63. Re:This will be another solid update by n.wegner · · Score: 1

      Uhuh. But the carbon that runs on 8.x has been deprecated. Back when 9.x was cancelled, that carbon was deprecated too. Mach-O carbon has always cut all ties to 9.x, and has changed a lot since 10.0 as well. I doubt you'd find a lot of recent carbon apps that will run on anything before 10.2.

    64. Re:This will be another solid update by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Write a Carbon app instead of a Cocoa app and it will run on every MacOS from 8.1 thru X. If you want your app to run on every mac every made, you build a classic "fat binary".

      Yah, that's one solution, but then your users don't like you anymore because somehow they can tell when an app is Cocoa and when it's Carbon. I dunno why, but details of the APIs used are allowed to leak into the UI.

      The main problem that the original poster was referring to btw is the fact that MacOS has no real upgrade management. The way it works is this:

      On Windows, you have installers, which check your system for the components they need. Typical components are, ActiveX, DirectX, MDAC, Internet Explorer, Shell32 etc. If the version is too old, it is upgraded. This sometimes breaks things, but generally people prefer it to having apps require XP for instance.

      On Linux you have ELF (symbol) versioning. When you compile an app, you can control which set of libraries (and for glibc, symbols) it links against. Then you can install sideloaded libraries if the versions on the system are too old or two new, and glibc never breaks backwards compat so that's OK.

      Apple generally doesn't make large core upgrades available for free, so application authors have a problem. Not all their users will be on the latest version, so they have to cleanly disable code that needs the new features. Unfortunately, MachO wierdness means that isn't always as simple as dlopen()ing a library like what you'd do on Linux or Windows, so they use something called "weak references". Basically if a symbol is missing, when run instead of failing to start, the app will run but with the missing symbol set to NULL. If it's used, the app will crash, but you can check if it's NULL before use.

      Sounds great right? Well, it would be, but weak symbols were only introduced with 10.2, and API coverage was not complete. In fact, it wasn't even mostly complete. IIRC not even all of Cocoa was covered. So, in the absence of any easy way to cleanly fail features, and no way to upgrade the OS legally, apps end up having hard dependancies on the latest version of the OS.

      That fulfills Apples goal of getting more upgrade sales because suddenly all your apps need the latest version (or the developers must be careful to code things and compile on separate copies of the OS etc), but makes life harder for the user and developer. Hopefully they will get weak symbols sorted out soon. It's still lame compared to Windows because you have to switch off features, but at least it's an acceptable compromise.

    65. Re:This will be another solid update by jafac · · Score: 1

      WTF -
      OS X is *NOT* even supported on an 8600.
      I have TWO 9600's at my home, and I'm not stupid enough to attempt to run OS X on them. I run Classic on those machines.

      What you're talking about is the equivalent of running Windows 2000 (or perhaps NT 4) on a 486 90MHz. Hell, even Win98 forbade installation on a 486 33 (but not a 486 66).

      =-
      On the other hand, I've been running the latest OS X on my upgraded Beige G3. And it performs respectably for simple tasks like email, web browsing, file copies, etc. I only upgraded it when I wanted to mix it up for some video editing, so I plugged in a 500 MHz G4 cpu, and 512 Megs of RAM. That's the equivalent of putting a 500 MHz P4 into a 233 MHz Pentium. I reckon you couldn't even put that much RAM into a box that old.

      And if you want to see a Mac that runs faster than it's Wintel counterpart - well, that's the whole point behind this G5 hubub. Apple has had a platform with a technology potential to leave Wintel machines in the dust since 1994, and never really quite lived up to that potential. Until today.

      I'm especially pleased that they left the prices in the ballpark of "reasonable". ($3000 for the top-end system's pretty reasonable, but I'm not so sure $2000 for the bottom-end machine really is).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    66. Re:This will be another solid update by poptones · · Score: 1
      Microsoft should (but won't) take a page from Apple's book. You can as a company, co-exist peacefully with the Open Source community.

      Why don't you write an "open source" widget that will allow people to replace that ugly-ass "brush metal" theme they keep sticking on their desktop and let us know how "frinedly" they are about that?

      Apple has put themselves in a great position IMO for the future.

      Meh. Looks to me a lot like the same old dog and pony show.

    67. Re:This will be another solid update by axxackall · · Score: 1

      How about Apple's decision to release iTunes fo OSX 10.2 or later leaving 10.0 and 10.1 user out of hope?

      --

      Less is more !
    68. Re:This will be another solid update by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However, there is a very large misconception among CERTAIN MAC USERS (not ALL) that Mac OS is FreeBSD and FreeBSD is Mac OS

      There is also a very large misconception among CERTAIN LINUX USERS that anybody who makes a single penny off software they write is a capitalist whore who should be shot and have their code repossessed by RMS. There is also a very large misconception among CERTAIN WINDOWS USERS that IE *is* the computer. Just because a very small portion of any group tends to be out there, it doesn't mean you should hold it against the whole.

      As somebody who is a Mac user and knows many other Mac users, from power users to my mother who only reads email and surfs the web, I can't say that a single one of them have this misconception you allege. Spread your FUD elsewhere please.

    69. Re:This will be another solid update by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Yup, it encouragd me to dump XP install Win2k & use Mozilla.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    70. Re:This will be another solid update by mbbac · · Score: 1
      Most apps require 10.
      Such as?
      --

      mbbac

    71. Re:This will be another solid update by Evro · · Score: 1

      MS may be evil, but they never forced me to buy a new version of windows to get the latest web browser.

      Not true, IE as a standalone app is being discontinued, and the new "integrated" version will only be available for 2K/XP. And who the hell said you have to use Safari? If you really want it that bad, think of it as a $130 browser. Mozilla, Chimera (?), and IE all still work. MS may not be developing IE for mac anymore, but you still have a functioning version don't you?

      --
      rooooar
    72. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Having used FreeBSD for a couple years, though, I just think it'd be a nice gesture to say "thanks". Nothing more, nothing less."

      On the Mac OS X web page at Apple, it says that Mac OS X is based on state-of-the-art BSD Unix foundation, and that Panther is updated to FreeBSD 5.0. That seems to be a pretty big nod to the BSD people. If anything, the BSD community should be thanking Apple for making their OS the widest spread commercial UNIX around.

    73. Re:This will be another solid update by hayne · · Score: 1
      Why don't you write an "open source" widget that will allow people to replace that ugly-ass "brush metal" theme they keep sticking on their desktop and let us know how "frinedly" they are about that?

      It's been done - by Unsanity: metallifizer
      Well, it's not open source, but it is free. And Apple hasn't had any complaints.

    74. Re:This will be another solid update by cenobita · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify, I do agree on some counts with what you're saying, most notably with the misconceptions that many Linux users have. However, just as I don't assume that those misconceptions exist within all Linux users, i'm not going to assume the same about all Mac users.

      You may not have encountered people like the ones that i've mentioned; if so, it's very possible that the people i've spoken to are a very small minority, in which case, no further clarification should be needed. However, I still stand by the fact that they truly do believe the misconceptions i've noted.

      I'm not spreading FUD anywhere; merely noting my impressions based on some of the users i've encountered. Why is this so difficult to understand? Based on those people, I was (perhaps mistakenly) operating under the assumption that this kind of thinking was a bit more widespread. If you disagree with my solution to that, then you're certainly welcome to that opinion, but that doesn't necessarily make my reason for describing such a solution entirely invalid.

    75. Re:This will be another solid update by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      I honestly don't see any argument in showing that Apple gives out an unsupported OS for free. If you install it, you won't be able to use most applications written for OS 8 and newer. If you could show me that Apple provides updates to their older operating systems for running newer apps, I'll be impressed. I just don't want to be forced to upgrade to the lastest Mac OS in order to install the latest apps.

      -Lucas

    76. Re:This will be another solid update by machinethatgoesbing · · Score: 1

      Have you been living in a box for the past few years. IE6 does not run on Winbloze 95, and now M$ are no longer releasing installer versions of IE for Windoze at all, it will only be available as part of a Service Pack. When was the last time they released a service pack for 98 / NT? Is this not forcing users to upgrade?

    77. Re:This will be another solid update by green+pizza · · Score: 2, Interesting

      MS may be evil, but they never forced me to buy a new version of windows to get the latest web browser.

      You will now. MSIE 6.0 SP1 was the last release for Win98/Me/2K. Future versions will require a full OS update.

      Also, there's nothing keeping you from running Firebird or Camino on your Mac.

    78. Re:This will be another solid update by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      Where the hell did you hear that from???????

      The only change I'm aware of is that they are halting production of Internet Explorer for the Macintosh and Internet Explorer. There is a rumor floating around based off some guy's interview that there will be no stand-alone upgrades of IE. That isn't an official announcement though and they haven't decided how to handle future rollouts of IE. I highly doubt that Microsoft would stop producing new releases of IE for prior releases of Windows.

      -Lucas

    79. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually 7.6 is the last "old mac" version, and it significantly more stable than 7.5 and doesn't require a half-dozen service packs. Too bad it's not on Apple's FTP.

    80. Re:This will be another solid update by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see you run IE6 on Dos 3, dos 4, dos 5 windows 1, or windows 2 or windows 3.1 or windows 3.11
      go on.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    81. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I hadn't seen *anything* that would indicate what you've mentioned

      Did you even look at Apple.com?
      http://www.apple.com/macosx/jaguar/uni x.html

    82. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really. I have Windows 98 on an old notebook. IE 5.5 is as good as you can get. IE 6 not supported in windows 98

    83. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, then the apple users recognize that some stuff came from bsd already. okay, no issue there then.

      apple rocks.

    84. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure it's the complete OS? My bet is that it's just an update for 7.5 to 7.5.3.

    85. Re:This will be another solid update by andy2kxp · · Score: 1

      Microsoft should (but won't) take a page from Apple's book. You can as a company, co-exist peacefully with the Open Source community

      They don't want to co-exist but they love to reap the benefits of open-source, their TCP/IP stack comes from *BSD.

    86. Re:This will be another solid update by otuz · · Score: 1

      Actually, 7.6 won't run on 68000 processors and machines with '32-bit dirty' ROMs.
      8.0/8.1 runs on 68040 and powerpc:s only.

    87. Re:This will be another solid update by otuz · · Score: 1

      It's not that bad, but I'd prefer to run 7.1 on a 680x0 machine.. Unless 16M or more RAM and a speedy cpu (25Mhz 68030/040 or faster) are available.

    88. Re:This will be another solid update by arekusu · · Score: 2, Informative

      In my experience as an amateur Cocoa developer, it's pretty common that the feature I really need just plain wasn't available until version foo.

      For example, I need Open GL render-to-texture. The "documented" API wasn't available until 10.2.

      I need Open GL copy-from-framebuffer-to-rectangle-texture. This was there in 10.2, but wasn't accelerated on ATI cards until 10.2.5. For my application, unaccelerated == unavailable.

      So, there are very often cases where I am forced to just not run unless "system version >= foo"

      In other cases, there is functionality that would be much easier to get at if I have version foo.

      For example, I really want a disclosure triangle as a Cocoa control. It's not available as of 10.2.6. So do I roll my own, or require version foo?

    89. Re:This will be another solid update by hysterion · · Score: 1
      ITs a win-win business model.

      More like mac-bsd, no?

    90. Re:This will be another solid update by otuz · · Score: 1

      Apple uses the FreeBSD userland, because the NeXT Step has the 4.3BSD userland. FreeBSD provides a nice and consistent upgrade to the "unix" experience of NeXT.
      FreeBSD runs on the FreeBSD kernel, MacOSX/NeXT runs on the Mach kernel.
      You could use FreeBSD userland on a linux kernel too, but that wouldn't make Linux FreeBSD. Neither would the GNU userland running on a FreeBSD kernel make FreeBSD Linux.

    91. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about - your link doesn't even point to the IE download - it is for the high encryption pack - and the newest one for win 3.1 is Internet Explorer 4 for Windows 3.1 and Windows NT 3.51

    92. Re:This will be another solid update by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      Amongst the Mac people I know, they've developed a bit of a "well, now I know UNIX! h4rdc0r3!" sensibility about Mac OS, but they attribute that strength and flexibility to Apple


      Well, aren't they correct to do so? It was Apple that put the necessary (for them) candy-coated GUI around BSD and got their favorite MacApps to be ported to run on the BSD core... so without Apple, these people wouldn't be able to use Unix. Thanks to Apple, they can now use Unix (or at least Apple's version of it). Makes perfect sense to me.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    93. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The BSD community shouldn't be thanking Apple for anything. Apple used their work because they couldn't make a decent OS.

      How's the Open Group lawsuit going? Maybe soon, we won't have to hear mac os and Unix in the same sentence anymore.

    94. Re:This will be another solid update by thunderbird46 · · Score: 1

      Yup, the entire Mac System 7.5.3 is there. 19 approximately floppy-disk-sized files. I've made use of it myself, I put it on my Power Mac 6100 as an experiment to see if I could get by with just software downloaded from the internet on it (7.5.3 to boot it, Debian Linux for when i was actually using it.)

    95. Re:This will be another solid update by clf8 · · Score: 1

      I said this somewhere else, but OSX is still maturing. The APIs will get nailed down. Carbon and Cocoa and Java will all eventually act the exact same way on the system. Sure, there will continue to be things that rely on the latest version, but only because the latest version will have added features. As OSX develops more, you'll see fewer things that require an OS upgrade (and fewer apps that have different versions for 10.1 vs. 10.2 vs. 10.3).

    96. Re:This will be another solid update by Dr_Cornholio · · Score: 1

      And with a carbon app, you can't turn on the sexy brushed metal theme of a window. It can only be done using a cocoa app. have a bit of a tinker with ur dev tools (interface builder) and see what I mean. I like brushed metal print centre and terminal :)

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the monkey spanks you!
    97. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um...actually, my daughter and wife use Jaguar on an Umax S900 upgraded with a G3 450 card. The S900 has the same motherboard as a Powermac 95/9600. It works just fine thanks. Grab the xpostfacto utility from www.macsales.com

    98. Re:This will be another solid update by humina · · Score: 1
      What have you given back to the free software community?

      Putting up with Anonymous Cowards

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
    99. Re:This will be another solid update by humina · · Score: 1

      Specifically microsoft's reality distortion field involves sweating profusely. Worst reality distortion field EVER

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
    100. Re:This will be another solid update by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      iTunes 4 is for 10.2. Everyone else has iTunes 3.

    101. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS makes cheap software like Ford makes cars. Apple makes the equivalent of BMW in their respective markets. Elegant and featured, for a price.

    102. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that Apple needs to intentionally avoid linking to FreeBSD/NetBSD, considering that FreeBSD doesn't compete with MacOS X at all (since it doesn't run on ppc) and NetBSD on a Mac is exotic enough that the people who are going to be running that combo obviously knew what they were doing ahead of time.

      Apple could easily recommend running one of the free *BSDs on non-Apple hardware, although it probably benefits them that people still think of PCs as "Wintel" machines and they can keep the mainstream view of competition as "Mac vs. Wintel".

    103. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrorist killer murderer. Death murder killer murder killer murder.

      TERROR monger killer murderer hellspawn death Satan killer.

      Murderer killer. You cut throats, kill children. You support murder. You are the evil killer incarnate. Muslim Islam death killer. You wear diapers in November and wait for the shit-prophet to arise.

    104. Re:This will be another solid update by Gery · · Score: 1

      ... but they force us to buy new hardware at least every two os-releases... Have you ever tried to run WinXP on a 486?

      The only hardware-force apple demanded were 128 MB RAM for MacOS X.

      Gery
      ----

      --
      The answer is yes, me.
    105. Re:This will be another solid update by einer · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about Camino? Yeah, you can't run Safari. So?

      IIRC, there are apps that won't run on MS Windows 3.1, so yeah they did force you to buy a new version of windows.

      Your argument seems to be: "I shouldn't have to pay for the development costs of producing a new OS with new capabilities and improvements, just so I can run an improved and FREE version of a web browser that shares nearly identical functionality with another browser that WILL run on my old, cheap ass operating system." Is that about right?

    106. Re:This will be another solid update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're trying to.

  25. Steve Jobs plan by jlechem · · Score: 1, Troll

    10 add new nifties to OS
    20 call it an upgrade
    30 Charge 130 bucks for it
    40 PROFIT!!
    50 goto 10

    Not to troll but these upgrades always remind me of service packs for windows. And they seem to come out just as often.

    --
    Hold up, wait a minute, let me put some pimpin in it
    1. Re:Steve Jobs plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Service Packs are free, though.

    2. Re:Steve Jobs plan by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      Not to troll but these upgrades always remind me of service packs for windows. And they seem to come out just as often.

      just as often? at least mac waits a year before upgrading, didn't windows xp have a service pack on the day of it's release?

      --
      I write code.
    3. Re:Steve Jobs plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you always spew bullshit? Windows XP has one service pack that was released well after it was released in 2001. In pretty much that same time OS X has gone from 10.0 to 10.3.

    4. Re:Steve Jobs plan by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do people constantly bitch (yes, bitch) when someone dares to charge for software that they can do without?

      The release od Panther doesn't make your copy of Jaguar any less useful - it doesn't detract from Jaguar's functionality, ease of use or anything else.

      If you like what Panther has to offer and can't live without it then buy it. If you don't think it has anything significant to offer or that it's poor value for money then don't. It's that simple.

      Nobody forced you to upgrade from OS 9 to OS X and nobody forced you to upgrade from OS X 10.0 to Jaguar. Similarly, nobody's got a gun to your head forcing you to fork over your cash for Panther.

      You don't expect free upgrades for life do you?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    5. Re:Steve Jobs plan by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but service packs don't add over 100 new features to the OS and give you MORE software. Usually they just fix old bugs and security holes.

    6. Re:Steve Jobs plan by Gatton · · Score: 1

      To be fair they are far more than just service packs. They add lots of features that do add value but whether or not those features are worth $129 is up to the individual to decide.

      I personally don't care for buying my OS again every year. That's what it amounts to. I waited to buy Jaguar earlier this year so it will sting a little more than usual unless I wait a while to buy Panther also.

      I personally would prefer an upgrade price. I know that point was beaten to death on many Mac forums last time around but I think it's valid. To each his own though.

    7. Re:Steve Jobs plan by chasman · · Score: 1

      PPulleaze. These upgrades are NOTHING like Service Packs. Services packs have no new features, by design. If you have been on computers (not game machines) long enough to remember the move from Windows 98 to Windows 98SE, you wouldn't make comments like that. We paid $88 for NO new features and 54 very needed bug fixes that should have been in a new service pack, and you still have to reboot every couple of days, because of the memory leaks. I'm thinking free fax from any app, X11, auto backup of .mac, in all 100 major changes makes it a worthwhile upgrade.

      The problem with service packs is they don't come out often enough. If they did, we wouldn't have a new Windows hack every week.

    8. Re:Steve Jobs plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of crap. Microsoft releases patches and fixes through Windows Update before service packs are released and every knew hack is really just the same old hack that people haven't patched from 4 years ago.

      It's true that service packs don't offer new features but Microsoft provides a lot of that for free. The free power toys is a good example. Tons of neat stuff on the equivalent of what Apple is announcing here and Microsoft just gave it away. Add to that the huge freeware and shareware PC community versus the tiny Apple community.

    9. Re:Steve Jobs plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if I pay such a big hardware tax, I expect my software to be cheaper

    10. Re:Steve Jobs plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't expect significant new features for free.

      However, I would expect (for free) the bug fixes / support so that Jaguar works as well as any other modern operating system.

      When we bought my wife her new powerbook I don't remember seeing a commercial where iMovie crashes every 10 minutes.

      I'd expect her Powerbook G4 not to crash every other day into a state where the machine is off and not even holding the power button down for 10sec, much less just pressing it, does anything.
      (She had to call AppleCare just to get the magic keypress to allow her machine to power up again)

      I'd expect to be able to use at least one of our two HP printers with her Mac.

      I'd expect to be able to use our Sandisk USB memory card readers with her Mac.

      Instead it looks like we'll get the enjoyment of paying $129 for an upgrade that may or may not fix these problems.

      Given the amount of media coverage that people give to OSX Jaguar being such a great OS I expected a lot more then it currently delivers. And yes, I would expect these issues be fixed for free.

      And you may call me a troll, but I'm the one that suggested we buy her the Mac.

    11. Re:Steve Jobs plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because the cool stuff is available free. Check out Powertoys, Fun Packs, etc. here. Not to mention the tons of freeware available.

    12. Re:Steve Jobs plan by SirSlud · · Score: 1


      Windows Professional XP: Full Version 299
      Upgrade: 199

      1998, Me, 2000, XP .. seems like *something* comes out every 2 years or so that costs 300 bills. They have some different features and support different things, and you don't need to upgrade or crossgrade if you dont want to.

      Sounds roughly the same (Apple even a little cheaper), but I find Apple's software to be far more elegant and valuable to me.

      Using your logic, why not pretend that Apple doesn't introduce its next OS for another 5 years. Whoops?! Its only 129 bucks? Not bad to me.
      Longhorn will be more. I mean, people pay more than 129 bucks a year on coffee.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    13. Re:Steve Jobs plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for the record, windows XP HAD more than 18 megabytes of patches released on the very first day XP was in stores. those patches along with other patches became service pack 1.

    14. Re:Steve Jobs plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, MS service packs are seperated to almost yearly, most of the time a bit longer.

    15. Re:Steve Jobs plan by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      No, but it's like... Hey, get Safari for free! (If you have Jaguar). Get iCal! (If you have Jaguar).

      --
      Martin
    16. Re:Steve Jobs plan by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      The release of Panther doesn't make your copy of Jaguar any less useful - it doesn't detract from Jaguar's functionality, ease of use or anything else.

      That's assuming that:
      1) the developer tools will continue to be compatible with Jaguar, and
      2) that any security flaws found in Jaguar will be unexploited.

    17. Re:Steve Jobs plan by deathmolor · · Score: 1

      You don't understand, we are Mac customers if Apple releases something new we must have it.

      Don't you get it. There is no, nah forget it attitude so we have the right to bitch about price. :p

      PC users just don't get it.

    18. Re:Steve Jobs plan by jlechem · · Score: 1

      There's a huge difference between 98 to XP or 2000. Alot more then what you get for upgrading from 10.2 to 10.3. XP is an entirely new OS, 10.3 no matter what you say is just an upgrade to an existing OS. Based on what I've seen it's more equivalent to a major SP release from MS.

      --
      Hold up, wait a minute, let me put some pimpin in it
    19. Re:Steve Jobs plan by CanJap · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer an upgrade price too. I've heard of Mac fans being so pissed off that they were being gouged even for the 10.2 'upgrade' that they bought it and copied it. so Apple got the price of 1 OS for 5 or 6 or 7 people instead of 5 or 6 or 7 reasonably priced upgrades. so tell me 1 * 129 or 5 * 40? which is better? I can understand them if they paid for every os since 8 or 9 or whatever. Ok full price from 8 to 9 or 9 to 10 or 10 to 11. but discounted for 10 to 10.1 to 10.2 to 10.3 not full price for not a full overhaul. give us the discounted prices and you'd fair better in the longrun by not pissing people like me and those others off of gouging them for full price like we were 1st time customers on each step. Imagine having to take a driving test every few years to renew your driving liscense instead of paying the admin fee for the new one. It's like learning to drive all over again. there'd be alot of pissed off people there. all we are asking for is a break since we are keeping current and cash coming into the company. not being treated as first timers. I don't blame that group of people for doing that. maybe it's a good idea. especially after all the money I've given the company in the last 4 years. I've bought 4 computers from them in that time. now give a repeat customer a break for christ's sake!!!!!

    20. Re:Steve Jobs plan by CanJap · · Score: 1

      5 * 40 ??? what a deal. I meant 5 * 80 as reasonable. I know Apple has to make some money. but stebe jobs please do something about prices. many people said to me they'd switch to mac if they were cheaper. get your f***ing ego out of the way and include the lower end of the market too. I think then maybe more offices would start to use macs and then you'd be better off in the long run with that increase. maybe that's why apple's market share hasn't change that considerably in the time since the new iMac in 98.

  26. Berlin WWDC blog provides fresh experience by Damek · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's a blog from the Berlin conference at OnlineBlog, Guardian Online's Blog. It's kind of amusing (since I'm not there), as it seems a storm has knocked out the satellite feed, and they're watching the QuickTime stream, and alternately getting drunk...

    1. Re:Berlin WWDC blog provides fresh experience by marko123 · · Score: 1

      it seems a storm has knocked out the satellite feed

      I know Cumulo-Nimbus storm clouds can go very high into the sky, but taking out a friggin satellite? Sheesh, it must have been pretty low-orbit.

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  27. Predictive Compiling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Xcode:
    Completely new set of Developer Tools. Speedy: fast compiles using GCC 3.3, Finder UI built (over 100,000 lines of code) in 377 seconds on a Dual 1GHz G4. Distributed builds can speed building by using other machines on a network (built in 208 seconds with an extra machine and 96 seconds with four machines). Zero Link only links objects needed to launch. Predictive Compile literally starts compiling before the program is told to compile. Fix and Continue can make changes to apps while they are running. A single fix turnaround in Xcode takes about 3 seconds on average.

    [source: http://www.4osx.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=1449 ]

    1. Re:Predictive Compiling by zulux · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A single fix turnaround in Xcode takes about 3 seconds on average.


      If this works - this may change the way people develope large C++ projects.

      I typically imbed a small parer into all of my large apps so I can quickly tweak the behavoiur of the app without a compile/link cycle.

      IF I can tweak things and compile/like at this speed - who cares?

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:Predictive Compiling by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

      Java has this in 1.4+.

      So does MSVS for C/C++.

      Glad to see that I can use it on the mac finally! Yea!

    3. Re:Predictive Compiling by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      I have been doing this with VisualAge for Java for years now.

    4. Re:Predictive Compiling by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

      Which JRE are you using, AFAIK, being able to apply code changes while the code is running requires JRE support, which only was added in 1.4

    5. Re:Predictive Compiling by arkanes · · Score: 2, Informative

      MSVC doesn't do predictive compilation. I understand there's some third party tools you can use to fake it. Edit/Continue debugging is something else.

    6. Re:Predictive Compiling by WatertonMan · · Score: 1

      This is one of the most exciting things announced. I was reading the keynote over at ARS so I didn't see if they demoed the new Apple compiler or Codewarrior. I've been rather disappointed with the IDE on both. (Especially compared to Visual Studio) Still this sounds like a kick ass feature. I'd really like to switch to a Mac as my primary system. But the compilers have really limited me here.

    7. Re:Predictive Compiling by *weasel · · Score: 1

      actually i think edit/continue debugging is the same thing. not as predictive compilation, but in letting you fix the program as it's running.

      predictive compilation is really only useful for giant projects which take nontrivial time to compile. for the rest of us it comes off as the machine just going ahead and doing a recompile in the background during idle time on the off chance we're gonna hit F5.

      i don't have tons of cross platform data, but ime 177 second compile for a 100k sloc project isn't blindingly fast, it's about par.

      the distributed compile is hella neat though. if they could extend distributed compiles to being automatic and hefting resources from the underutilized machines of the other coders in a given project group or even entire department - that'd be worth a flag-waving.

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    8. Re:Predictive Compiling by burner · · Score: 1

      JDK 1.1 and more recently JDK1.2. VisualAge has it's own bastardized JVM (albeit with such nice features). VisualAge also does a better job of it than jdk1.4 (the JPDA), but the cost of the VAJ development team updating the JVM for each release was too much work. Hence, we have Eclipse. VAJ was nice in many ways, but I absolutely hated it for many reasons, all of which have been resolved with Eclipse. (pluggable JVM, decent CVS integration, using files in the file system, decent linux versions...)

      mike

      --
      MRSH-Recording device, corned beef sandwich with kraut, seafaring bird, and the foamy top of a beverage.
    9. Re:Predictive Compiling by psavo · · Score: 1
      pvsavola@tienel:~$ apt-cache show distcc
      Package: distcc
      Priority: optional
      Section: devel
      Installed-Size: 288
      Maintainer: Paul Russell <prussell@debian.org>
      Architecture: i386
      Version: 2.5.1-1
      Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libpopt0 (>= 1.7), adduser, debconf, netbase (>= 4.09)
      Filename: pool/main/d/distcc/distcc_2.5.1-1_i386.deb
      Size: 105268
      MD5sum: be492277ca73441ea42aafc48883f63d
      Description: Simple distributed compiler client and server
      distcc is a program to distribute compilation of C or C++ code across
      several machines on a network. distcc should always generate the same
      results as a local compile, is simple to install and use, and is often
      significantly faster than a local compile. distcc does not require all
      machines to share a filesystem, have synchronized clocks, or to have
      the same libraries or header files installed.
      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    10. Re:Predictive Compiling by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Actually, VAJ has a pluggable JVM as well. I actually really like the built in source control.

    11. Re:Predictive Compiling by tyrione · · Score: 1

      So tell me.

      Where is the support for Objective-C, ObjC++ and Java?

      And yes I use Debian as well and it won't be of the same caliber as Xcode.

    12. Re:Predictive Compiling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your saying I would want to buy four if I wanted to run Gentoo on it?

    13. Re:Predictive Compiling by boots@work · · Score: 1

      distcc does Objective C and C++. They're just so infrequently used outside of OS X that they're not worth mentioning in the Debian release.

      Distributed compilaton of Java is a whole other kettle of fish. I don't think there is any good solution in Xcode or elsewhere.

      it won't be of the same caliber as Xcode.

      Strangely enough it's exactly the same thing, rebadged, and with some Aqua sugar-coating.

      Go away troll.

  28. Proof Apple is still not enterprise ready... by Ciderx · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Its insanity to kill off an OS after 1 year. How on earth are you meant to develop the system, deploy and support these OSes if they are forcing upgrades all the time. The only place these have is in home machines where they don't have these enterprise considerations. If Microsoft did this sort of thing, they'd be rightly roasted on here...

    1. Re:Proof Apple is still not enterprise ready... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Jaguar is not the OS, OS X is the OS. It is not being "killed off after a year," simply upgraded to a new version. No one is being forced to upgrade, nor will developers be forced to optimize for 10.3 (the minimum requirements for new software will probably continue to be 10.2, which was the first Really Stable release).

      Comparing actual improvements and new features to a bundle of bug fixes in an OS that didn't work in the first place is.. well.. missing the point.

      In any case, "enterprise" is clearly not Apple's target market, with the exception of graphics houses and the like. Corporate America can go right on crunching numbers in Excel on the gray boxes.

    2. Re:Proof Apple is still not enterprise ready... by Doctor+Beavis · · Score: 1

      I think you are misunderstanding their announcements. They are not "killing off" their current OS after 1 year, they are continuing to improve it and add features. The core, underlying OS is not substantially different (e.g., Unix). I don't think that ~yearly upgrades disqualify an OS for "enterprise operations." Besides, Microsoft "upgrades" Window$ with service packs and so forth all the time.

    3. Re:Proof Apple is still not enterprise ready... by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please explain, in 300 words or less, how Apple is forcing the upgrade.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    4. Re:Proof Apple is still not enterprise ready... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      He is telling developers that Jaguar is dead, as far as Apple is concerned. Just because Apple is no longer developing for 10.2 doesn't mean that it has vanished from the planet. If they could do that, SCO would be licensing the process!

      I'm sure that many companies (including my own) will be more than happy to continue running Mac OS X 10.2.x for quite a while until 10.3 is a proven solution. After all, you know any large enterprises tripping over themselves to install the latest Windows desktop software after it gets annonunced as a *preview* ?

      Besides, do you think that Microsoft is developing for Windows 2000 anymore? I'll give you a hint... the answer starts with the letter 'N'

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    5. Re:Proof Apple is still not enterprise ready... by Halo1 · · Score: 1

      They're not killing off Jaguar. They even haven't killed off 101 yet, security updates that affect it are still released when necessary. They do have to (and can) keep improving Mac OS X though, since it's still quite young (and no, I'm not talking about iChat A/V).

      --
      Donate free food here
    6. Re:Proof Apple is still not enterprise ready... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forced upgrades?

      Do you even know what that word means?

    7. Re:Proof Apple is still not enterprise ready... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'll give YOU a hint. Yes Microsoft is developing for Windows 2000. They still release patches and will probably release at least another service pack before its end of life.

      Most mac programs now require at the very least 10.1, usually 10.2. I still use Windows 2000, works perfectly for everything I need and is surprisingly stable.

    8. Re:Proof Apple is still not enterprise ready... by chasman · · Score: 1

      ummm, Microsoft does do this. Consulting at a 2000 seat client now, with NT 4.0, Windows 2000, and XP Professional running on various machines. At least there is some compatibility around OSX; Jaguar and PAnther will probably set up and run the same.

      Moving from MS machine to MS machine, remembering different commands and shortcuts for 3 distinct operating systems... ugh.

      If you are a home user, please don't whine about the 'enterprise'.

    9. Re:Proof Apple is still not enterprise ready... by dbrutus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Quick releases are the proof of significant innovation. If everything runs on 10.1 or 10.2 there's no need to upgrade in an enterprise situation unless the next version provides more benefit than the cost to switch. And with net booting, upgrades are considerably easier than walking around with a CD to each system.

    10. Re:Proof Apple is still not enterprise ready... by jo42 · · Score: 1
      MacO S 10.2 (AKA Jaguar) is dead.

      Long live Mac OS 10.3 (AKA Panther)!

      If Microsoft did this

      Your problem being...?

    11. Re:Proof Apple is still not enterprise ready... by zonker · · Score: 0

      and how many times over the years has gates and his unchained monkeyboy gotten up at the podium and proclaimed the future with the latest version of windows?

  29. Apple Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The apple store is being updated, i think were about an hour away from having our collective socks blown off.

    i am geek, hear me roar.

  30. 1 GHz front bus! by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

    Wooo-hoooo! The rumours were true!

  31. Re:blowing your load early? by OmniVector · · Score: 1, Funny

    *gets napkin*

    too late :(

    --
    - tristan
  32. Apple + PPC970 = True! by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Steve Jobs just confirmed at the WWDC Keynote that Apple systems with the PPC970 are a reality! No word yet on availability.

    1. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by Rand+Race · · Score: 1

      And Macslash says Powerbook G5!

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    2. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1
      And Macslash says Powerbook G5!
      Macslash says "Internal Server Error" for me -- that's why I pointed to Maccentral instead... :^)
    3. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by Rand+Race · · Score: 1

      But Macworld just posted the models and those don't look like Powerbook prices to me (2x2Ghz @ $3k).

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    4. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by Drakonian · · Score: 4, Informative
      Unconfirmed reports say: Shipping in August.

      3 Models:

      1.6GHz $1999

      1.8GHz $2399

      Dual 2GHz $2999

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    5. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by __aaklbk2114 · · Score: 1

      Prices just came out...

      1.6GHz $1999
      1.8GHz $2399
      Dual 2GHz $2999

      I can see 3K for the dual processor machine, but the other two need to be way less if Apple wants to gain more market share...

      Just so you know, I like Macs. Alas, mod as you wish...

    6. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Looking at the specs on Macslash I'd say someone got over excited and typed book when they meant to type mac.

    7. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by p0ppe · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --


      "Democracy is three wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner."
    8. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by Uart · · Score: 2, Funny

      what the hel! I just paid > $2000 for a 12" Powerbook! I want a free G5 powerbook!!!!

      (Think Steve will go for that one?)

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    9. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by Richard5mith · · Score: 1

      Previous models were $1499, $1999, $2699 and $3799.

      Considering these new ones are MUCH faster than pretty much anything out there (including the $4000 Dell machine they tested it against) these seem like pretty fair prices to me.

    10. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by zonker · · Score: 0

      ahh, now i know why i can't get to macslash, you killed it! nice going. hheheh ;P

    11. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by arhines · · Score: 1

      That makes zero sense.
      SINGLE 1.8GHz 2399
      DUAL 2GHz 2999
      =only 600 bucks to get an extra processor and boost both of their clock speeds by 200? Also includes the cost of a dual cpu motherboard...and probably more base RAM etc... Just doesn't sound like apple to be handing that kind of upgrade out so cheap; I wouldn't take any stock in that rumor.

    12. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by zonker · · Score: 0

      thanks for the link, but jeeze... it looks... cold. i dunno, maybe i need to see the presentation to warm up to it. sorta looks 2001: space odessy industrial-ish.

    13. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by arhines · · Score: 1

      The key being the "$4000 Dell machine they tested".

    14. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      They're all dual-processor machines.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    15. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Also that lowend model was a combodrive, and the new models are all superdriv-equipped.

      Expect a combodrive model in a couple of months, once demand for the higher-spec models drops off.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    16. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by RoLi · · Score: 1
      This is just going from "insanely overpriced" to "severely overpriced".

      I really hope Apple gets their act together and offers a machine with PCI slots for less than 800$.

      An offering like that would double Apple marketshare within less than a year.

      There are a lot of people out there who like Macs (including me) but who will not pay over 1000$ for a machine, especially when you can't get a replacement motherboard or CPU at a fair price.

      And that's the other gripe I have about Apple: If they want to offer high-quality machines, fine with me. But high-quality means availability of spare parts, which means that they will have to have motherboards and CPUs in the Apple store for a reasonable price. (I'm generous: I will accept a 20% premium compared to similar x86-parts. I won't accept 200% though.) But with the current situation, Macs are throwaway computers after the warranty expired and that's not high-quality in my book.

      That said, I really would like to have a PPC970 computer, but not at that price and not at the risk of having to wait while the thing is being mailed to or from Apple when something breaks.

    17. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by brucehoult · · Score: 1

      I just went to the Dell site and put together a dual Xeon 3.06 system with DVD burner, 150 GB IDE drive, 512 MB RAM and no monitor.

      $4354

      Makes Apple look cheap.

    18. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by WatertonMan · · Score: 1

      Nope. Only the top of the line one is. Which is weird given the pricing. Something seems off.

    19. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Crap, looks like you're right. I guess I spoke too soon.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    20. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by Subliminal+Fusion · · Score: 1

      It may not make sense, but it's what Apple's site says: http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/A ppleStore?family=PowerMac

      Besides the faster processor, the only other difference is the dual 2ghz machines have better video (RAM is the same on the 2 models)... My guess is that all the motherboards are dual processor boards. Regardless, if I had $3k to burn the dual G5 would most likely be my next computer.

    21. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is funnier when you read it with your sig...

    22. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      3 Models:

      <snip>

      --
      All models are wrong. Some are useful.


      Are those three models wrong? They look right to me.

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  33. Re:What no 970 - Live Broadcast Here at IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering they're showing the speech live in the cafeteria here at the one of the IBM PPC design sites, I bet the 970 gets mentioned.

  34. APPLE STORE IS DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i guess we are getting some new toys... hmmm i can't hit refresh fast enough

  35. duh--- they just announced the G5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ALWAYS wait for the "one more thing"!

  36. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Jaguar is based on freebsd, jaguar is dead, this is a sure sign that bsd death is imminent.

  37. Apple store offline for updates!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apple store down for updates.

  38. your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I clicked the link in your sig, but I'm telling you, it really really had me on the goatse defensive fingers pre-positioned on alt+f4

    1. Re:your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try placing your hand over the center of the monitor. that works much better.

  39. thankyousirmayihaveanother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FreeBSD 5.0

    Huh? That doesn't make much sense. Perhaps they've integrated more code from FreeBSD, but FreeBSD 5.1 has been out for some time now.

    WTF is the $129 price tag for? Can you imagine the uproar if Microsoft were to charge $129 for minor version upgrades, then immediately announce the previous version was "over" and force everyone to upgrade?

    1. Re:thankyousirmayihaveanother? by cenobita · · Score: 1

      While it's true that FreeBSD 5.1 has been out for awhile now, it's still technically a sort of -STABLE release..otherwise, the 4.x branch would've been killed already. As things currently stand, they may still take things as far as 4.9 or 4.10, last I heard.

    2. Re:thankyousirmayihaveanother? by jkeyes · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      But you forget this is Apple and they're allowed to have a monopoly on their own hardware and give deliberately monopolistic terms on their Operating System (not permitted on non Apple Hardware anyone?) and force upgrades every year at $129. When MS released Windows 98 SE they allowed Windows 98 users to upgrade for $20 if they wanted to, it wasn't even forced. (If you paid the $20 MS sent you an upgrade disc)

    3. Re:thankyousirmayihaveanother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you're also forgetting is that Apple sells stuff that actually WORKS.

      You're complaining as if BMW shouldn't be allowed to sell their cars for higher prices than Hyundai...

      MS sucks, Linux ain't ready for the masses yet (even if you elitists think otherwise).

      What choice is left? Apple.

    4. Re:thankyousirmayihaveanother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh shut the hell up. SE was a bug fix release. they should have drove it over to everyone's house. This is a major upgrade just like going from 95 to 98 to XP. Go download your little Red Hat release for free and be happy with it. Or, alternatively, get a job and "purchase" yes "pay money" for something better.

  40. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by Roofus · · Score: 4, Informative

    If the Apple store was up right now, I'd point you to the "Family License" version that costs $199, and is good for up to 5 computers.

  41. Breaking news... by jared_hanson · · Score: 2, Informative

    The leak on the Apple store website was true, and Jobs just admitted it in the process of announcing the new G5. Check MacCentral for live updates on the keynote.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:Breaking news... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1
      From the Mysterious future on slashdot:

      Apple: New G5 Power Macs "Fastest Desktop In The World"

  42. G5 by Councilor+Hart · · Score: 1

    They have been announcec.
    64 bit, will run old 32 bit apps

  43. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical Apple user. Doesn't like Microsoft or Linux, but is to dumb to stop using Apple products and gladly forks out $$$ for mostly free code.

  44. It's TRUE !!!! by nether · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1.6 Ghz -- 800 Mhz FSB
    1.8 Ghz -- 900 Mhz FSB
    Dual 2.0 Ghz -- 1 Ghz FSB ...

    Straight from his Stevie-ness.

    1. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by clarencek · · Score: 1

      Three Models:
      1.6GHz, 80GB HD, 256GB RAM - $1999
      1.8GHZ, 160GB HD, 512GB RAM - $2399
      Dual 2GHz, 160GB HD, 512MB RAM - $2999.

    2. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      $2000 for the low-end machine.

      It may be a great computer, but Jobs has lost his fucking mind.

      That's a $600 increase.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    3. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by gerbache · · Score: 1

      Bear in mind that these are Powermacs, which are considered the high end professional league of the apple lineup. They still have iMacs and eMacs to cover the lower end. Considering all that has gone into these machines, it makes sense to me.

    4. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by Tackhead · · Score: 0, Redundant
      > It may be a great computer, but Jobs has lost his fucking mind.

      (1, Redundant). Twice. :)

    5. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by Clock+Nova · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Tell that to gamers. Or anyone who wants a machine they can upgrade. The i and eMacs just don't cut it for anyone but grandma. I need something i can replace my $1499 Quicksilver tower with.

      I hope to god they're not pricing these machines this high simply to encourage people to buy iMacs.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    6. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      And the low end machine by then will most likely be a 1 or 1.42 GHz G4.

      For Joe Desktop-Publisher or Lisa Low-Middle-Photoshop that's all they need.

      Franky 1200 DPI CMYK and Bob 10.2 Server w/mysql can justify the 2 grand for a 64bit workstation

    7. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 3, Informative

      Note that these all have Superdrives. Expect a Combodrive base model once demand drops a bit (September-ish I'd guess, maybe october), at ~$1600-1700 USD.

      Given the likely supply issues, Apple's going to try and lower demand initially (That's why the only SMP box is the 2GHz, and why they're all Superdrive models), and then quietly introduce cheaper, lower-spec models in a few months (They've done this a few times before, including the superdrive/combodrive trick)

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    8. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by Dutchmaan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >

      Well if you're a gamer and price is an issue for you then wouldn't you be better off buying a PC? I never really considered the mac as a hardcore gamers machine.. not that it doesn't have the power for it... but there are other practical issues which makes a PC a better choice for *hardcore gamers* IMHO.

      Personally speaking, I rarely use my mac for games.. it was actually much more practical for me to build a PC for that...

      Choose the right tool for the job you want to do.

    9. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      That argument simply does not work for Mac users who, like me, wouldn't be caught dead with an MS product in their homes. I use my Mac for everything, and have no problems. But I've always counted on a low-end PowerMac being in, what I consider, a reasonable price range (that's below $1500.) But at $2000, plus monitor, that's beyond reasonable.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    10. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by jx100 · · Score: 1

      yeah, and it has so much less RAM..

    11. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      Well, all I can say is that sometimes ideology carries a price tag.. and in your case a quite literal one.

      Bear in mind that this is a brand new system with LOTS of improvements that aren't in the current line..not just CPU (which I might add is a 1.6Ghz - 64 bit chip - better than most things on the market even from intel and AMD.. but thats another debate)

      $2000 doesn't seem all that unreasonable for a mac that can compete with the big players in the market considering its market size.

    12. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by Golias · · Score: 1
      But I've always counted on a low-end PowerMac being in, what I consider, a reasonable price range (that's below $1500.)

      It is. It's called an iMac. If an iMac doesn't meet your needs, I have a news flash for you: You are not a low-end user.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    13. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      But at $2000, plus monitor, that's beyond reasonable.

      Yeah, my Quadra 650 (33MHz, FPU, 12MB RAM, 230MB HD, no CD-rom cost me $2300.00 back in '93. Damn them for not charging $7000 like they used to (FX)!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    14. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by Rand+Race · · Score: 2, Informative
      Get ye to the store. MDD G4s @1.25Ghz start at $1299 now. There's your low-end Powermac. No bitching that these aren't G5s, low end PCs ain't got Itaniums either.

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    15. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Just checked the Apple Store, and you can drop the price to about $2450CDN by selecting a ComboDrive and no modem, that'll be just south of $1800US.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    16. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by afidel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seems pretty reasonable, just speced a 1.6Ghz Opteron, 512MB DDR ECC (PC2100), DVD-ROM, DVD-RW, GiG-E, 80GB Segate SATA drive, Audigy 2 OEM, Win XP Home, ~$2,000, and if the Apple comes with an FX it will have much better graphics (was using onboard because it was not going to be used for anything graphics intensive). Plus Velocity Engine is MUCH better than SSE2 for vector ops.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    17. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by heXXXen · · Score: 1

      Hypertransport is 1/2 the CPU speed, why is this surprising? Especially since Apple is a HT consortium member.

    18. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This appears to be the same chip, 3 times, with 3 different FSBs... Could you buy an 800MHz FSB system and push the bus to 1GHz?

    19. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by alienw · · Score: 1

      What kind of gamer uses Macs, anyway? Macs have even fewer games than Linux does. In fact, they have only one that is worth playing -- UT2003. On the PC side, you have stuff like Battlefield 1942, Morrowind, GTA: Vice City, etc.

    20. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      THIS kind, jackass. And I've got plenty of games.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    21. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by alienw · · Score: 1

      The "jackass" kind? Yeah, seems about right.

    22. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by tigga · · Score: 1
      What kind of gamer uses Macs, anyway? Macs have even fewer games than Linux does. In fact, they have only one that is worth playing -- UT2003. On the PC side, you have stuff like Battlefield 1942, Morrowind, GTA: Vice City, etc.

      Don't you know most successful game? It's Warcraft 3. And yes, there is a Mac version.
      BTW, could you name at least one new game for Linux? Anything 2-year old doesnt count.
      As for Mac - check for yourself - http://shop1.outpost.com/category/Outpost/Games/Ma c+Games/

    23. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by Genom · · Score: 1

      BTW, could you name at least one new game for Linux? Anything 2-year old doesnt count.

      Shadows of Undrentide. Sure, we don't get movies or the toolset, but the game is playable (and the toolset runs under wine with a bit of coaxing). The "final" NWN client (same thing, really) was just released too (NWN being slightly ove 1 year old, IIRC)

      UT2K3 is another one (also a little under a year old, but was out much earlier for linux than NWN, yes?)

      Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory. Released...what...a month ago?

      ^_^

    24. Re:It's TRUE !!!! by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      Apparently you could use a lesson or two in diction, grammar, and syntax. And humor.

      Jackass.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
  45. Here comes the 970 by ulbador · · Score: 1

    From the Apple Store:

    We are busy updating the store for you and will be back within the hour.

  46. More pay for updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Most of this stuff should be free for download.
    I hate to say this, but apple may be shooting itself in the face with this update.
    Combined with people who paid for Jaguar, that brings the OS update cost to ~300dollars US??

    Some people claim M$ is greedy...
    I just see Apple floundering...

    1. Re:More pay for updates? by dubstop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with you. As a customer of theirs, I don't feel like I've been treated particularly well by them.

      In the last year, I've spent more than $200 in total on an OS upgrade, and a subscription to the email service that was free when I bought my Mac and signed up for it. I might just about be able to think that this was ok, if it weren't for the fact that Apple now seem to be refusing to release a firmware update for my 5-Gig iPod, despite (from what I hear) there being no reason for withholding it, other than to force me into buying a new one. I bought one of the first iPods to be sold in this country and now Apple, in order to milk more money out of me, is punishing me for being an early-adopter.

      I don't think that I'll be buying Panther, and I'm seriously considering not renewing my .mac subscription. Enough is enough.

    2. Re:More pay for updates? by bmetzler · · Score: 1
      Combined with people who paid for Jaguar, that brings the OS update cost to ~300dollars US??

      How far back should we go comparitively with Windows? You don't get new versions of Windows for free? Why should Apple give you new versions of OS X for free? Don't you think it is right that Apple expects a fair price for their product?

      -Brent
    3. Re:More pay for updates? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Yup... Well, the Upgrade list price from NT 5.0 to 5.1 is $199 per license. So while 129 is more than I would pay, it is still less than Microsoft.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    4. Re:More pay for updates? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Since 1998, Win98 OEM $80 (building the PC myself and it was bought bundled with a hardware purchase so it was legit), 98SE upgrade $80, WinXP Home Upgrade $80, Total in 5 years $240, so in five times as long I have paid 25% less, not to mention that I have paid about 1/3rd for equivilantly performing hardware. Apple has their strongpoints but price has never been one of them.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:More pay for updates? by RoLi · · Score: 1
      Why should Apple give you new versions of OS X for free?

      Because it would make the Macintosh platform look more stable and a safer investment, it would make people upgrade faster which would kill off buggy earlier versions faster and would allow software developers to use the new features earlier, because (gasp) it would make customers happier?

    6. Re:More pay for updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2000 to XP is not the right comparison. For 2000 users XP is a mostly bells and whistles. For 98 and ME users XP was as big a step as OS 9 to OS X. Most 2000 users haven't upgraded and probably won't until they get a new machine (if even then).

    7. Re:More pay for updates? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Oh, so now we pay 299 for the version we want. Not $199.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    8. Re:More pay for updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you get that from my post? The upgrade cost is $199 for XP pro and $99 for XP Home (good enough for most users). That is the price whether you upgrade from 2000 or 98. I am not sure where your $299 comes in.

    9. Re:More pay for updates? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      $299 is the FULL price for XP Pro, and since you don't qualify for the upgrade from 98 or ME you pay the full price. Home isn't adequate for anyone. And doesn't provide the handy dandy features we are discussing... Active user switching, etc.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  47. Let's here it for the Mac user base! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As always, providing an excellent example of Helsinki Syndrome.

    1. Re:Let's here it for the Mac user base! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only it was others paying for our new systems releases..

  48. New developer tools by superspoon · · Score: 1

    I'm scared, I just learned how to use the current ones :(

    --


    YarrRrr
  49. No! Don't do it! by eMartin · · Score: 1

    "Got to do it, though...."

    They are only charging you because they know that!

    Apple has now both raised the price and shortened the time in between paid OS upgrades. Keep paying for them, and soon you be shelling out $200 every 6 months.

    For years, people have been saying "Apple is a hardware company. They make software to get people to buy Macs" and that's fine with me, but I'm not going to start paying them for every piece of software and service they put out until they work on my PC hardware too.

    1. Re:No! Don't do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple charges it because people will pay it. Microsoft does the same thing, just a hell of a lot slower, and gives you a hell of a lot less.

      I'm not going to start paying them for every piece of software and service they put out until they work on my PC hardware too.

      It'll never fucking happen. Why the fuck should you care how much Apple charges for OS upgrades when you aren't even a customer? If a completely optional $120 once a year scares you away, then why would you be willing to pay $1000+ for a Mac?

    2. Re:No! Don't do it! by eMartin · · Score: 1

      "It'll never fucking happen. Why the fuck should you care how much Apple charges for OS upgrades when you aren't even a customer?"

      Who said I wasn't a customer? In this room, I have my Centris 650, Powerbook 2400, PowerMac G3, and Powerbook G4, and for many years, I was happy to give Apple money for hardware as long as they put out quality software to use on it, which they did, often, and without charging for much of it.

      Unfortunately, OS X will only work well on one of the Macs that I mentioned, and I certainly won't pay more than $100 every year just to be able to use the latest version of iTunes.

    3. Re:No! Don't do it! by dek2000 · · Score: 1
      Being a student, I can thankfully get the new upgrades at the educational rate (for now). Still, it's no excuse for these prices.

      Even Microsoft realizes this to an extent - upgrades to new software versions are cheaper than buying the new version outright (albeit not significantly). Unless it's a completely new product, loke from 9 to X, it seems ridiculous to pay full retail for every single point-release.

      It's true, of course, that even Panther costs less than an upgrade to XP Pro. That being said, though, XP may be around until 2005 or so, by which point there will be who knows how many new OSX releases - times $129.

      Shaking down loyal customers is an excellent way to ensure that you end up with less of them.

    4. Re:No! Don't do it! by Genom · · Score: 1

      Apple charges it because people will pay it. Microsoft does the same thing, just a hell of a lot slower, and gives you a hell of a lot less.

      No argument there.

      It'll never fucking happen. Why the fuck should you care how much Apple charges for OS upgrades when you aren't even a customer?

      Maybe because I research things before I buy them. The yearly update cost of $120 or so is an additional cost to figure in when considering the purchase of a Mac.

      Let's face it, the Mac software is at least half the reason to buy a Mac...possibly more. If you just want the hardware, you can get a comparable PC system for quite a bit less, on the average. It's the software you can't get elsewhere.

      I could understand $120 or so for a major version upgrade (9->X, X->XI, etc...), but for a point release, it seems rather expensive. $49 or so would seem the reasonable price to me.

      If a completely optional $120 once a year scares you away, then why would you be willing to pay $1000+ for a Mac?

      I won't argue there, either. It's actually one of the reasons that, while I have really enjoyed using Macs in the past, and would like to own one, I don't. The total cost, all things considered (including replacing software I already have, like Photoshop) is a bit more than I'd care to spend right now.

      If Apple were to lower their prices a bit, they'd likely sell more Macs to folks like me who view their current prices as prohibitive. Of course, they also have to recoup their development costs - which I would imagine are quite high - so any decision to lower prices would also have to take that into account.

    5. Re:No! Don't do it! by boots@work · · Score: 1

      If Apple were to lower their prices a bit, they'd likely sell more Macs to folks like me who view their current prices as prohibitive.

      You know, the same goes for BMW.

      Apple's positioning at the moment is that they don't *want* to sell more Macs to people like you. I say that with all due respect -- they're not selling one to me either at the moment. They're more concerned with offering the best designed and integrated package, even if it's more expensive for the MIPS. I can respect that, even if I'm a cheapskate who'd rather put Debian on an x86 built from parts.

  50. Re:blowing your load early? by RestiffBard · · Score: 2, Informative

    No. Lets see, I've got Slashdot, MacNN and MacCentral all reloading every few minutes. And of course when Jobs is done I'll watch the quicktime stream. here

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  51. G5!!!!W0W0W0T0T00T00T01!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    G5!!!!W0W0W0T0T00T00T01!!!!!!!!G5!!!!W0W0W0T0T00T0 0T01!!!!!!!!G5!!!!W0W0W0T0T00T00T01!!!!!!!!G5!!!!W 0W0W0T0T00T00T01!!!!!!!!G5!!!!W0W0W0T0T00T00T01!!! !!!!!G5!!!!W0W0W0T0T00T00T01!!!!!!!!

    ...at least according to Macnn's live coverage

  52. woohoo faxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now i'm gonna upgrade my Apple GayBook for only 130 dollars and I'll be able to send faxes like a fax machine.

  53. About time... by micq · · Score: 1

    A new feature called Expose allows minimizing into a smaller window, all open windows, to temporarily move everything out of the way, sort of like workspaces.

    Thank you! It was a pain in the ass to have everything exploded on the desktop and not have an easy way of reducing everything to see the desktop...

    1. Re:About time... by FireBreathingDog · · Score: 1

      In the meantime, try Show Desktop. I've been using it for months in the menu bar. Just what the doctor ordered!

  54. G5's announced by alfredo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apple shows off the worlds fastest PC with three things: chip (G5), system, product. The G5 has some amazing properties: it's a 64-bit processor, runs up to 2GHz, and has a 1GHz front-side bus. It offers full SMP ("designed entirely for SMP"). The G5 has a the industry's highest bandwidth using an entirely new architecture. It has a 12 unit core with 2 FPUs.

    --
    photosMy Photostream
    1. Re:G5's announced by qorkfiend · · Score: 1

      It'll be interesting to see how well Apple dealt with the 32-bit backwards compatability issue. Intel/HP tried to do this, but took an amazing performance hit.

    2. Re:G5's announced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It'll be interesting to see how well Apple dealt with the 32-bit backwards compatability issue. Intel/HP tried to do this, but took an amazing performance hit.

      For the same clock speed, I heard stuff ran at LEAST 1.5 times FASTER.

      I'll take that kind of "performance hit" any day!

  55. Take another look at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and tell me that you weren't in fact had ;)

    1. Re:Take another look at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure, but that nebula does sorta look like a goatse pic in itself.

  56. What comes next after Jaguar and Panther... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Funny

    OS X 10.4 = Bengal
    OS X 10.5 = Lion

    And then Apple will have to move to the non-feline NFL franchises. Names to look forward to are Titan, Giant, Jet, Raider, Buccanneer, Eagle, Falcon and Raven but Packer, Ram, 49er, Colt, Redskin and Seahawk don't sound too good.

    Something tells me that they won't ever be using Bill though.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:What comes next after Jaguar and Panther... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And then Apple will have to move to the non-feline NFL franchises. Names to look forward to are Titan, Giant, Jet, Raider, Buccanneer, Eagle, Falcon and Raven but Packer..."

      Butt Packer?

    2. Re:What comes next after Jaguar and Panther... by ohboy-sleep · · Score: 1

      Something tells me that they won't ever be using Bill though.

      They did, but after four straight failures they gave up.

    3. Re:What comes next after Jaguar and Panther... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS X 10.4 = Bengal
      OS X 10.5 = Lion


      Something tells me that those will be Apple's two worst OS'es

    4. Re:What comes next after Jaguar and Panther... by jpvlsmv · · Score: 1
      OS X 10.4 = Bengal


      Oh yeah, that one will be real successful..

      --Joe
  57. Brushed Metal Appearance by Talking+Goat · · Score: 5, Funny
    "The Panther Finder is brand-new, with a new brushed metal appearance..."
    Well, then it must be better! It looks like the future! Ooohh, shiny...

    --

    + G to tha Izzo, A to tha Tizee, Talking Giz-oat, Ya'll Bettah Feel Me... +
    1. Re:Brushed Metal Appearance by frankie · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Stupid textured windows. Am I really the only one who minds that Steve Jobs is violating his own freaking guidelines?
      This window style has been designed specifically for use byâ"and is therefore best suited toâ"applications that provide an interface for a digital peripheral, such as a camera, or an interface for managing data shared with digital peripherals, such as the Address Book application.
      This appearance may also be appropriate for applications that strive to re-create a familiar physical deviceâ"the Calculator application, for example. Avoid using the textured window appearance in applications or utilities that are unrelated to digital peripherals or to the data associated with these devices.
      Within an application, the textured window appearance should be limited to the primary application window.

      Consistent UI standards are one of the main reasons the Mac succeeded. The man should at least have the decency to change the HIG rather than ignore it.

    2. Re:Brushed Metal Appearance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Now if only it came with babes of the future fighting evil robots. Now that would be a computer! Mmmmmmm.

    3. Re:Brushed Metal Appearance by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

      You are certainly not the only one. The pure tackiness of brushed metal is enough to make me nearly completely avoid trying out OSX. Status symbols that apparently appeal to people with little taste simply do not interest me.

      My GF was looking at a Mac laptop recently, and the ugly brushed metal look certainly had a hand in convincing her to not bother with Apple.

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
    4. Re:Brushed Metal Appearance by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Now I can understand why one would want, say, a
      media player, or an internet exploder, but unless
      I was on a safari, why would I want a panther
      finder at all, leave alone care about the
      texture of it's metallic finish?

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    5. Re:Brushed Metal Appearance by armchairlinguist · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Safari is brushed metal as well, and when I was using OS X at work, I avoided it almost entirely for that reason (I used Camino instead). If the Finder had been brushed-metal, I would have been very unhappy.

  58. G5 is announced by ljaguar · · Score: 1

    11:10 AM - the G5 has some amazing properties. 1) It is 64 bit (as mentioned). Runs 32-bit apps nativly. 2) runs at up to 2Ghz 3) 1ghz frontside bus. but we knew all this already.

    11:09 AM - World's fastest PC is here. There are three things. Chip, System, Product. The chip is the 970 (g5). 64-bit. Made by IBM. Screw Motorola.

    11:09 AM - It's true!

    11:08 AM - Here are the g5's. He's talking about the leak.... Was it true?

    1. Re:G5 is announced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta love the irony of Mac users praising IBM for making their computers so fast.

    2. Re:G5 is announced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couple of things:

      a) Why did you order that in reverse chronological order?
      b) Are you going to change your name to lpanther?

  59. Re:This will be another solid update - correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a beautiful thing, because you can still use OS 10.0 if you want to
    crawl.

  60. Ironic Sig by Nutcase · · Score: 3, Funny

    -> Sometimes, you just gotta break free from the shackles of proprietary code.

    And othertimes, apparently, you have to drop 2-3k on the most proprietary home computer available.

    1. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, because being based on FreeBSD 5.0 is soooo proprietary.

      Sure, the higher-level parts of of OS X are straight-up Apple's, but the whole thing sits on top of a crapload of open source stuff. it's a hell of a lot less proprietary than WindowsXP, and a hell of a lot more usable than Linux.

    2. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy did they got you hook, line and sinker. Apple is all about the GUI which is NOT open source. And propietary goes beyond just the software. Apple is the king of propietary hardware. Building your own Mac costs just as much as buying one and is a real pain in the ass.

    3. Re:Ironic Sig by 1010011010 · · Score: 1


      That would be the XBox, no?

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    4. Re:Ironic Sig by Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Good point. But the XBox isn't really a "home computer" - it's a game console consisting of the same bits + some other crap. Arguably that makes it a home computer thats so proprietary it can't even function as a home computer - but then the definition comes into question again.

      Argh. In any case, it's a close race. ;)

    5. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And othertimes, apparently, you have to drop 2-3k on the most proprietary home computer available.


      You're the second poster to say something like that, and I have to say it makes no fscking sense to me. What's proprietary about a Mac? The standard harddrives, cdroms, usb, firewire, or video? The OS with an opensourced core? The dozens of heavily documented programming APIs? A Mac is no more proprietary than a Sony or a Dell, and it's without a doubt designed better.

    6. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man are you stupid. All of those things are wonderful (and most are standard on PC's) but the key is that you can only install OS X on an Apple computer. The end. That is propietary. I mean think about what you are saying - if that is your criteria for being open then Microsoft has Apple beat.

    7. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here it is in baby talk so maybe you can understand it better.

      Me build computer with PC stuff. I choose AMD or Intel. I choose Xeon, Pentium, Celeron, Athlon, Opteron, or whatever I can afford. I put Windows, Linux, BSD, whatever on it. Anything but OS X.

      Me want to build Mac. I have to scrounge around for parts and hack together a machine. Even then I no good for OS X license which say only Apple hardware.

      For $400 (without monitor) I build computer that beats shit out of any Mac available today.

    8. Re:Ironic Sig by thpook · · Score: 1

      No... you can install linux quite easily. NetBSD, too.

    9. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here it is in baby talk so YOU can understand it better:

      Apple not competing with cheap-ass do it yourselfers like you. Apple competing with prepackaged box makers and doing bang up job of it.

      Apple no give a shit 'cause you too cheap to buy complete machine.

      Suck it.

    10. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did not say that you can install only OS X on an Apple. I said you can only install OS X on an apple. One means that you cannot install other OS's on an Apple and the other means that OS X cannot be installed on other hardware. It is the latter that was my meaning.

    11. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man are you totally lost. What if I started a business selling the PC's I built? Those prepackaged machines were built by somebody. If I want a PC I have hundreds of companies to choose from. If I want a Mac I have only one. Does that make it at all clearer? Would you like me to type it fo-ne-tic-lee.

    12. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And sometimes you realize that, just maybe, someone makes a product worth paying for.

      Let me refer you to Penny Arcade:

      "Sometimes things cost money"

    13. Re:Ironic Sig by Mikeytsi · · Score: 0

      That SOUNDS good, until you add in the motherboard and bios. Apple's bios is a proprietary design, and you can install an Apple OS without it. They did this way back when to eliminate competition in the marketplace (thus killing all the apple clones that were eating in to the hardware sales), and that is what makes them a bunch of cocksucking bastards. Sun uses SCSI drives, does that make them open?

      --
      I've been called a "Fucking Dick" by better people than you.
    14. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CAN'T. CAN'T install an Apple OS without it. Stupid proofreading.

    15. Re:Ironic Sig by curtlewis · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think Windows is the most proprietary system out there. It doesn't work with anyone else, you always have to work with IT.

      Macs on the other hand, work with everything. Even the low level core OS, Darwin, is open sourced. Alot of Unix code compiles and runs on OS X. OpenOffice support for OS X just went GM, for example.

      MS is about as closed as you get. While Apple ships on a close hardware platform, the OS isn't entirely closed, making is less proprietary than MS.

    16. Re:Ironic Sig by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Oh man are you stupid. All of those things are wonderful (and most are standard on PC's) but the key is that you can only install OS X on an Apple computer. The end. That is propietary.

      Before you call that person "stupid," I think somebody should point out that you clearly misunderstand what is commonly meant by "proprietary hardware."

      Years ago, when Apple was using NuBus and IBM was using Microchannel for their respective card expansion options, those were examples of proprietary hardware. You could only plug Microchannel cards into those IBMs, and you could not use them with any other PC (unless they licensed Microchannel from IBM.) Eventually, both the IBM PC division and the Apple designers came to their senses, and they switched to Intel's PCI design, which pretty much the rest of the home computer industry had already moved to.

      Proprietary hardware is troublesome, because it restricts the availability of expansion and replacement parts. You are either locked into the original vendor, or to the handful of hardware makers who have specific hardware license agreements with the company who invented the hardware platform in question. Over the years, a lot of companies (including Apple) have attempted proprietary solutions for memory, video, expansion cards, etc. They seldom succeed, unless they manage to get the rest of the industry to adopt it as a standard.

      Writing an OS that is specific to your company's computer architecture (such as OS X for the Macintosh or Solaris for Sun servers) is not an example of "proprietery hardware." It's an example of operating system software integration, and if vendor lock-in (for the complete system, not for replacement parts) doesn't scare you, it can be a very good thing.

      My G3 tower has been upgraded with a third-party IDE hard drive, a third-party G4 CPU, a third-party PCI SCSI card, a third-party Firewire CD-R drive, and lots of third-party memory. All of these parts were industry-standard items which could have been installed in almost any x86 box sold in the last few years, too (except for the CPU, which could be used on any open-firmware motherboard, but then you can't drop a P4 onto an Athlon board, either.) If Apple used proprietary hardware, as you claimed, none of this would have been possible. I would have had to purchace my CPU, HD, memory, SCSI card, and CD-R from Apple themselves.

      I mean think about what you are saying - if that is your criteria for being open then Microsoft has Apple beat.

      Microsoft, they have never, as far as I remember, sold any proprietary hardware at all. The only hardware they sell is usually stuff like re-branded HP mice and keyboards, using either PS/2 or USB.

      I'm not sure what your point about Microsoft is. Their software is not open, just as a lot of Apple's code is not open, but that doesn't really have anything to do with what we were talking about (proprietary hardware.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    17. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm totally lost? Those prepackaged machines are all pretty much the same under the hood regardless of which of those "hundreds" of vendors you buy from and you're still paying a premium price for sometimes questionable peripherals built with the lowest common denominator in mind.

      Keep your generic, shitty hardware that needs to be replaced every six months. I'll take the ROI on a Mac any day.

    18. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Writing an OS that is specific to your company's computer architecture ... is not an example of "proprietery hardware."

      It is if nobody else is permitted to make hardware that can run that OS. It's a step forward that the peripherals aren't proprietary, but I still can't drive down the street and buy an Asus G4 mobo.

    19. Re:Ironic Sig by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1

      I wonder when (not if, when) dirt-cheap computer (not inexpensive, cheap) you built goes kablooey, who can the sucker, eerrr, customer you built it for call to for fix it? Nope, they'll just chuck it out, curse themselves, and try again, this time hoping for a better result. In the mean time, my little iBook will keep rolling, despite the abuse I heap on it daily, knowing that if anything does go wrong, I have the best customer care in the business (Consumer Reports sayeth so) behind it.

      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    20. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You mean "Apple no give a shit because I'm too smart to buy parts that I don't need."

      Apple makes their money off people who like to waste money on parts that don't need to be replaced.

    21. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's BIOS? By this, do you mean Open Firmware? An open architecture ... IEEE 1275...

      You can find out more here:
      http://playground.sun.com/1275/home.html

    22. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would mean that the OS is proprietary, not the hardware.

    23. Re:Ironic Sig by deathmolor · · Score: 1

      It is safe to say that Apple systems are not proprietary at all. First of all you can use just about any pc hardware in a Mac as long as the bios is updated in them. I have done it many times. Plus they use standards like USB, Firewire, PCI and PCI-X that PC's use too. Most cards and USB devices fit in just fine.

      As for proprietary software that is not the case either. All modern Macs run Yellow Dog Linux or even popular Linux distributions such as RedHat and Mandrake.

      OS X also works on other hardware that is not Mac with the use of Mac-on-Linux. So as long has you have a PowerPC your good to go.

      OS X with X11 uses many and soon all the UNIX software you have come to know and love. All recompiled and ready to go.

      Sorry proprietary I don't see it. In fact other then running windows games (mainly because all non game software can be run with Virtual PC) there is nothing the Mac cannot do. In fact it is more compatible then most windows PCâ(TM)s.

    24. Re:Ironic Sig by alienw · · Score: 1

      Given that you can't build a Mac legally unless you are Apple, I'd say that's pretty damn proprietary. Sure, it works with standard devices, but the hardware itself is extremely proprietary. Nobody except Apple builds Macs. That is the criterion.

    25. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And nobody except IBM builds ThinkPads. What's your point!?

    26. Re:Ironic Sig by alienw · · Score: 1

      A Thinkpad is a PC. Many companies build PCs. A Mac is both a computer and a platform. BIG difference.

    27. Re:Ironic Sig by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Funny, I just checked the Apple Store, and their lowest price is $799. You checking the right site?

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    28. Re:Ironic Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said "PowerMac". Check again.

    29. Re:Ironic Sig by Golias · · Score: 1
      A Thinkpad is a PC. Many companies build PCs.

      A Mac is a Personal Computer, too. Many companies build Personal Computers.

      The fact that MS zealots once tried to redefine "PC" to mean "Computers that run Windows" doesn't mean that it's true.

      I currently have 5 PC's in my house. Two of them are Macs. Only one is running Windows.

      A Mac is both a computer and a platform. BIG difference.

      This discussion was all about whether Apple's hardware is proprietary. It's not.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    30. Re:Ironic Sig by Mikeytsi · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "Open" doesn't mean "I can do whatever I want with it", especially in this case.

      --
      I've been called a "Fucking Dick" by better people than you.
  61. Less is More? by 0000+0111 · · Score: 1

    IBM VP says it "costs $3 billion to fab this thing" because they "shrunk the gate length to 6 atomic units."

  62. G5 by svenjob · · Score: 1

    All the rumors and leaks about the specs of the G5 were true.

    --

    Totally Life!

    ALL replies

  63. I'm sadly disapointed this year. by danalien · · Score: 1

    What ever happened to their live webcast feed? since 1745 (live in sweden, thats GMT+1) I've hit their website for an update to get the url for the feed, but sadly none is available this year :(

    I've even gone to the trouble of booting up a windows pc (cause I'm a linux-boy), incase my mplayer with the !Live.com library won't work, so I have a backup, to catch his keynote Live.

    So to say the least, I'm sadly disapointed on them this year. Though not in the case if something extra unordinary tradically happened, in that case I would be forgiving, but just in such a case :P

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
    1. Re:I'm sadly disapointed this year. by superspoon · · Score: 1

      yes, the live feed was something I was looking forward this year, but NOOO they had to skrew it up! grrr....

      --


      YarrRrr
    2. Re:I'm sadly disapointed this year. by PhoenixK7 · · Score: 1

      By the minute updates here

      Link up to keynote stream will go up after the keynote finishes. LoopRumors says they'll link to it once it is available.

      Fear not :) The stream will probably be QT MPEG-4 which I don't think mplayer supports yet (Strange because it supports quicktime containers and a variety of mpeg-4 based codecs). So keep windows up for another half-hour or so and start the stream when it appears.

    3. Re:I'm sadly disapointed this year. by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      It was already annouced that there will only be a feed after the presentation. There won't be anything live.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    4. Re:I'm sadly disapointed this year. by danalien · · Score: 1
      naaah, I don't know exactly what QT MPEG-4 codec your speaking of, because I've been able to watch every .mov files there is out there. The only thing my mplayer complie (two days ago) didn't support was the RTSPotocol. And a quick recomplie with the !Live.com lib should make it work, though I haven't hade a feed to test it with yet(thought of doing it with the jobs keynote).

      if you have trouble playing .mov try the lates win32codecs &| quicktime codecs files, and try:
      1. mplayer -v [path/url to mov-file]

      and look for what tracks there are. and then:
      1. mplayer -vid [video track nr] -aid [audio track nr] [path/url to .mov file]

      for some reason some .mov files have multiple tracks, like some of the animatrix, and you have to specify video-id and audio-id as mplayer don't yet support multitrack'd .mov
      --
      I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  64. $129 is not too bad by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

    When you compare it to the $199 (retail) price you pay for a Windows XP Pro upgrade. I wonder if they'll have another "X for Teachers" program where they'll give away a free copy of the OS to every K-12 teacher in the U.S?

    1. Re:$129 is not too bad by numark · · Score: 1

      Don't know, but I do note that the boxed version of Jaguar under the educational discount program is almost half of the price of the standard priced Jaguar ($129 vs. $69) so even at that rate, it's pretty cheap for educational users to upgrade (assuming they do edu. discounts on Panther, which I believe they probably will).

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
  65. YOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot reader watches keynote

    slashdot reader sees new stuff from apple.

    slashdot reader shits self. twice.

    * even if you never touch an apple product in your life, you have to admit they are the only place REAL user-centric innovation is happening!

  66. FreeSBD 5.0 features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Panther is based on FreeBSD 5.0 you may want to check out the release notes for it.

    Of course FreeBSD 5.1 just came out last week or so (release notes.).

  67. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by dochood · · Score: 1

    Point! Now would be the time to do it, and it would give me latitude if I decide to buy another used Mac in the future.

    dochood

  68. Yet another high cost update.... fun fun by greymond · · Score: 1

    At least with windows you get the service packs for free - and the new versions only come out every 3 years - with this apple OS X BS it's been 3 version of OF X and I feel like i'm getting ripped off....

    I should have just stuck with 9....

    1. Re:Yet another high cost update.... fun fun by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but it looks like Apple is releasing as many new features in one year as Windows gets in three.

    2. Re:Yet another high cost update.... fun fun by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      If you're referring to the number of years between Win 98 and Win XP, then yes new versions of Windows come out every 3 years.

      I assume you've not taken into account Win 98 SE and Windows ME, both expensive service packs to Windows 98.

      Your point?

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    3. Re:Yet another high cost update.... fun fun by jo42 · · Score: 1
      OS X 'service packs' are also free...

      Go crick Software Update.

  69. Up to 2Ghz? by Gatton · · Score: 1

    According to the text feed from MacNN the G5 will run 'up to 2Ghz'. I know this is a 64 bit chip and that I shouldn't compare numbers but we know consumers will. Does this mean that 2Ghz is the most it will do?

    Another question. Too many cobwebs from electronics classes so many years ago so what does this mean:

    'IBM VP says it "costs $3 billion to fab this thing" because they "shrunk the gate length to 6 atomic units."'

    1. Re:Up to 2Ghz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't give you any help on the second question, but I'd guess that 'up to 2GHz' will either be the highest initially released or the highest they currently have planned for.

      But there's nothing to say it can't (and won't) go higher.

    2. Re:Up to 2Ghz? by Gatton · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well I see that they've announced a 3Ghz model within 12 months so that answers that question.

    3. Re:Up to 2Ghz? by numark · · Score: 1

      He didn't say it costs $3 billion to fab it, he only said that their new fab (in Fishkill, NY I believe it was said) cost $3 billion to build. I'm sure they'll be running more than just G5s at the plant.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
  70. What was that glass breaking sound? by acceleriter · · Score: 1

    Oh, never mind that. That was just the value of my 15" Powerbook.

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  71. Brushed Metal == ugh by Garthnak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Am I the only one who doesn't like the iTunes/Safari/etc. "Brushed Metal" look? And now they're doing it to the beautiful Finder? I can't imagine that I'm the only one who thinks it looks significantly less pretty than the simpler white look. The dark gray is just too intrusive and distracting, and it just doesn't LOOK as nice. I mean, here..

    http://www.studio2f.com/misc/images/1946sPanther -1 1-med.jpg

    Why is that better than this?:

    http://www.apple.com/macosx/jaguar/finder.html

    I ask you. Am I alone here?

    --
    Liberty in Our Lifetime - http://www.freeme.org/
    1. Re:Brushed Metal == ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hated the damn lines in the old version... looked kinda "prisonners-style" if you ask me.

    2. Re:Brushed Metal == ugh by greenskyx · · Score: 1

      You most certainly are NOT alone. I can't stand the Brushed Metal look... and I know there are a lot more people out there who feel the same way...

      That said I really do like Macs. The G5's sound pretty exciting!

    3. Re:Brushed Metal == ugh by 56 · · Score: 1

      I can see what you're saying. I'm pretty much ambivalent to both styles, but they should absolutely give people the option, especially if they're going to change from one to the other. Brushed steel look aside, from what I saw in that screenshot, the new finder looks far more streamlined and less confusing than it is now - my only experience with OSX is through the eyes and complaints of my technically inept mother.

    4. Re:Brushed Metal == ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah and i know this one guy who said stuff really sucks. he didn't specify though, so i assume he meant everything. he also lives in a box, so maybe that explains a few things.

    5. Re:Brushed Metal == ugh by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

      if you don't like it then use the haxie to remove brushed metal. Personally I think its the bee's knees

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    6. Re:Brushed Metal == ugh by cactopus · · Score: 1

      If they're gonna make the Finder brushed metal then they have to go all the way and make all menus including the system menu brushed metal... then it would look fine.

      I say do either or but not both.

      they're migrating towards brushed metal because the new G5's are brushed metal... the old G4's and G3's were pinstripe.

    7. Re:Brushed Metal == ugh by MoneyT · · Score: 2, Informative

      It may be possible to switch back in the preferences (themes) and there are plenty of themeing programs out there for OSX. It doesn't seem unreasonable to use one of them to return to your favorite style.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    8. Re:Brushed Metal == ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While I'm no fan of the brushed metal look, I'm pretty sure in the leaked screen shots there was an option to turn it off.

      But you are missing the best part. Big fat brushed metal finder windows mean we can FINALLY drag them by something other than the top menu bar. Like iTunes, or QuickTime, I assume anything metal is draggable!

      No more playing peek-a-boo with finder window trying to grab something to move them out of the way. Yeah!

      Of course, with Expose that may not be as important, but I still am looking forward to being able to rearrange windows with ease. It will sure make my hoby of spelling out obsene words in finder window that much easier.

  72. i don't wanna wait... by hatrisc · · Score: 1

    for my jaquar to be over...

    --
    I write code.
  73. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by dochood · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just started using Macs, after using Windows and Linux for years...

    I'll pay the extra, because I don't have to screw around with it to get stuff to work the way I want, like I did Linux and Windows.

    Call it "dumb" if you like, but it works for me. I'm not "dumb", but I'll admit to be "cheap" (hoping for cheaper upgrade this time around...)

    dochood

  74. "Built for Mac OS X Jaguar" by eMartin · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...says the announcement for QuarkXPress 6 on Apple's front page.

    So Quark has fallen behind once again?

  75. Chuh-ching Chuh-ching Chuh-ching $ $ $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An upgrade here, an upgrade there and pretty soon you're talking real money.

  76. PPC 970 confirmed as G5 by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 3, Funny


    As seen here (and soon on /.): http://www.rumortracker.com/framesets/macrumors/in dex.html

    # One more thing... some of you may have noticed on the net...there was a funny thing that happened last thursday... where specifications were posted.

    # 3 responses: 1) Can't be true 2) It's true 3) It's great marketing

    # "Premature specifications" - it was a mistake, and it's true.

    # We are delivering today - the Worlds Fastest Personal Computer.

    # The Chip - we turned to IBM several years ago.

    # We're calling it the G5. It is a 64-bit processor. The first first 64-bit desktop processor. Runs our existing 32-bit apps no problems.

    # fastest front sidebus - ever. designed for dual processor systems.

    # Massivly parallel. Up to 250 inflight instructions. -- can be processed at the same time. The G4 can do 16. Floating point "monster". Two fully symetric integer units. massive branch prediction logic.

    # This is a new generation architecture.

    Of course everybody expected it, heck, even the Apple WWDC pages used the term Velocity Engine (IBM-ism) instead of Altivec (Motorola-ism) like here: http://developer.apple.com/wwdc/tracks.html (in the last item "Hardware")

    Seeet!

    Now time to save some money and then spend it ;)

    Oh, what the heck, time to get more indebted :(

    Nooo, must resist temptation, DAMN YOU APPLE!!

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    1. Re:PPC 970 confirmed as G5 by ZigMonty · · Score: 1

      "Velocity Engine" is an Apple term. IBM calls it VMX.

    2. Re:PPC 970 confirmed as G5 by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      D'oh, should be sweet, not seeet, damn fat fingers, time to exercise.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    3. Re:PPC 970 confirmed as G5 by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

      Is it? Thanks for correcting me.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  77. Pixlet by killmenow · · Score: 1

    I find this interesting. Pixlet...new codec. Sounds a lot like "Pixar." Anybody know if Pixlet came from Pixar?

    1. Re:Pixlet by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      Anybody wanna bet that both pixar and pixlet were derived from pixel.

    2. Re:Pixlet by kawaichan · · Score: 1

      Actually, the codec was requested by pixar (one of steve's company as well), so yeah, they named it after it :)

      can't wait for iSight though!!!

      --

      kawai
    3. Re:Pixlet by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      Listen to the audiobook, The Second Coming of Steve Jobs to find out (available on Audible, tell them that "inertia186" referred you).

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    4. Re:Pixlet by lovelace · · Score: 1

      Anybody know if Pixlet came from Pixar?

      Considering Pixlet == Pixar Wavelet, I'd say the answer to that question is yes. :-)

  78. some specs by Councilor+Hart · · Score: 1
    I mean announced. (previous post)

    From macrumors
    Enclosures! 9 9 fans! Single/Dual processors. Up to 8GB Memory. Can talk to mem @ 6.4GB/s. 4x Superdrive in each. Geforce fx5200 in lower, radeon 9600 pro in higher mode. System - G5 System Controller - dedicated bandwidth to each subsystem. IBM is fabricating it. 6x faster than G4, 8GB bandwidth, 1processor doesn't slow down the other one. 400mhz DDR memory, AGP 8x Pro, 133mhz PCI-X slots. Hypertransport. Serial ATA. 1.5GB/s bandwidth. independent interfaces to each drive. Rest of the i/o - high performance. optical digital i/o and analog i/o, fw800 ,usb 2.0

  79. Aw, frickin' crud ... by WCityMike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dear Mr. Jobs:

    Iâ(TM)m not saying I donâ(TM)t want to pay you guys when you upgrade the OS. You guys put a lot of features in every release, and your staff deserves to get paid for it. Panther looks pretty damn cool, for the most part. Just do me a favor. Reward me, even with a paltry amount, for being a customer who likes to keep his OS up-to-date.

    Knock $40 off the price and call it a $89 upgrade fee. Hell, even $30, and $99, would be somewhat palatable. Thatâ(TM)s really not that much to ask, considering the discounts one can find elsewhere on the OS after a few months.

    Itâ(TM)s a bit more palatable than the pure psychological âoeF--K YOUâ of making me buy the operating system over and over and over again with every new release.

    Longhorn users may be waiting until 2005 for their next release, but I doubt theyâ(TM)ll have spent $460 or $690 by that point on keeping their OS up to date.

    Sincerely,

    Quite Unpleased Customer Who's About to Get His Ass Handed to Him By Fellow Mac Loyalists for Even Daring to Question the Wielder of the Reality Distortion Field

    P.S. To all those who decide to flame instead of intelligently reply ... please use a flame more creative than "whiner." Obliged.

    1. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a flame more creative than "whiner".

      Don't mention it.

    2. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, don't be such a .. uh.. person who whines!

      (seriously though, I agree with your post.. under $100 would be good for us Apple loyalists)

    3. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Quarters · · Score: 1
      Longhorn users may be waiting until 2005 for their next release, but I doubt theyâ(TM)ll have spent $460 or $690 by that point on keeping their OS up to date.

      I was going to say something almost identical to that. Yes, OSX is impressive. The pricing plan, though, is absolutely disgusting

    4. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by WCityMike · · Score: 1

      > Don't mention it.

      And the flame was ... ?

    5. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Really? Windows OSes like XP Pro cost updwards of $300 no?

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    6. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      All OS X prices are upgrade prices. You can't install OS X on anything but Apple hardware so when would you need a full version? Part of the OS cost is built into the machines that you buy. That's why they don't have full price and upgrade price like Microsoft.

    7. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by gsfprez · · Score: 1

      oh please stop.

      that was the most reasonable post i've read in a while on /. No one is going to hand you your ass when you post something which is so obvious and sane.

      speaking of which.. i no longer feel "guilty" when buying them from my wife's school's bookstore any more for $70....

      i have bought every version, including a family pack of Jag since X Beta.

      this... this is just silly.

      Come on, guys... $70 for upgraders from Jaguar - ask it to insert original Jag CD or something.

      still, everything appears to kick ass abd be cool, tho. MacMerc has been the best at live coverage so far.

      --
      guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    8. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The upgrade price of Windows XP pro is $199. That is the comparable value since there is no such thing as a "full price version" of OS X. You can't install it without the hardware. The full version of Windows is for when you put together a machine that has never had a license on it. When you buy Windows with a Dell the cost of the OS is around the same as the upgrade price.

    9. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Itâ(TM)s a bit more palatable than the pure psychological âoeF--K YOUâ of making me buy the operating system over and over and over again with every new release.
      You know 10.2 on your Mac won't self destruct when 10.3 is released...
    10. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Uart · · Score: 1

      $89... thats around how much I'm going to pay for it after my academic discount.

      I love being a student.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    11. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More creative than 'whiner'.

      Duh! :)

    12. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by jo42 · · Score: 4, Funny
      ...waving hand in Jedi manner...

      These aren't the Panther ISOs you where looking for...

    13. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to anyone who decides to flame your ass for wasting everyone's time, I'll add some sauce to your fire.

      What the @#$% kinda post was yours? Hi, sell it cheaper! Man, if they charged $99, you'd say "even $89 would be better"....

      typical. and yes I post as AC, because I have no idea what my password is...

    14. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep an eye on your local university...they may have a "sale" on the upgrade. I picked Jaguar up for my mom for $39 last year...*ducks*

    15. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by First+Person · · Score: 1

      Actually, the solution is quite easy - just buy a new machine.

      It might seem like I'm joking, but I mean this entirely seriously. An Apple machine will generally offer 3-5 years of life as your primary box. I figure that thereafter that disk space, memory, speed, and software requirement limitations will force an upgrade. Major OS releases are occurring about once a year. For that, you get many features you won't use plus three or four that you probably can't live without. Let's price those at $25 each (under the assumption that you probably could live without them even if you won't admit it to yourself). By this estimate, you're paying $50 a year ($125 - $75) after the first year to stay current. If you replace your compute every four year, the high cost you complain about is really $150 ($50 x 3 since each machine will come with the latest OS). This doesn't seem so bad to me, but let's continue.

      If you replace your machine every year (which you'd like to do anyway), the overhead goes to $0. This makes Apple happy and it makes you happy because you can always show off the latest, coolest machine. It might not make your bank account so happy, but two out of three isn't bad. I hope this helps justify your next purchase.

      --
      Given one hour to live, the student replied: "I'd spend it with professor FP who can make an hour seem like a lifetime."
    16. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get over it newb, just because apple didn't create a monopoly like microsoft back in the day, doesn't mean they can charge next to nothing on their software. Do you know what it takes to develop software? Programmers--bet you didn't know that.
      And contrary to popular belief, they actually do cost a shetload of money. So where do they get the funds to pay these programmers? In their software and hardware sales. Wow, what a concept! Taking profits from software to funnel back into the r&d/software programmer's cost. Oh my gawd, so revolutionary!

      Ok, sarcasm aside, just wait your turn, as soon as apple takes a load of the market share, they will start to lower their pricing model. You'll probably get mac os 11.3 for $20 in a few years. Not everyone can do it like microsoft...

    17. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But when Longhorn does come out, do you really think MS is going to offer it for only $199?!? Nope, it's going to be around $500, just because they can.

    18. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by rjstanford · · Score: 1
      Longhorn users may be waiting until 2005 for their next release, but I doubt theyâ(TM)ll have spent $460 or $690 by that point on keeping their OS up to date.
      No, but since you're getting many of the features of Longhorn now, think of it as paying the same price ... but without the two years delay. After all, when Longhorn is released, don't you think people who were willing to pay then would claim to be willing to pay the same (or more) to get it "two years ago"? Think about it...
      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    19. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      service packs are free.

      OS X 10.1 > 10.2 > 10.3 (all minor upgrades... called a service pack by microsoft)

    20. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by NaugaHunter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dear QUCWAGHAHHBFMLEDQWRDF,

      Thank you for noting that our "guys" put a lot of features into this release. Thank you for also noting that our "staff" deserves to get paid for it. However, I'm feel I would be remiss if I didn't point out that we also have to pay the CD manufacturers, box manufacturers, and print houses. Not too mention that our "staff" is probably a good deal larger than you think, and are, as you can imagine, premium people all around.

      As to your suggested pricing structure, we will take you advice into consideration. Far be it for us to know the worth and cost of our work so well that an unsolicited suggestion won't completely turn us around.

      Also, I am sorry to hear you feel that I am "making" you buy the operating system "over and over and over again". I am sure you will notice that your computer will continue to function with the software you have already purchased and installed. If that is not the case, please contact Apple Support for assistance.

      It is not generally my comment on a competitor's product, but rumor has it Longhorn users will pay a heavy price indeed.

      Sincerely,
      Mr. Jobs

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    21. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. They should offer a small discount to Jaguar owners.

    22. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by WCityMike · · Score: 1
      No one is going to hand you your ass when you post something which is so obvious and sane.


      You misunderestimated 'em, didn't ya?
    23. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by toonrmeusa · · Score: 1

      You don't have to upgrade. Your computer will not stop working. You won't be any less productive. You will be just as happy.

      --
      Toon toon! Black and white army!
    24. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by WCityMike · · Score: 1

      There have been a number of good responses to my original post, so far, and fortunately none of them (yet) simply say, âoeStop whining!â, which was the prevalent response for people advocating an upgrade fee for Jaguar from Puma.

      I do see a few people relying on âstraw manâ(TM) variants of what I said, though, so let me interject one thing to head off further remarks along that thread. For those of you who are making arguments that it is something that should be paid for: listen, Iâ(TM)m not opposing that statement. Apple puts way too much stuff in it for it to be free. (Although sometimes companies are just generous.)

      Iâ(TM)m merely stating that there should be a slightly lessened amount for people who are not buying it new. Is Apple really going to get financially hurt from giving a discount of at least $30 (preferably $40-45) to existing users? I honestly donâ(TM)t think so, and in fact, I think itâ(TM)d help. Stuff over $100 is a much harder sell than stuff below $100 ⦠even if the upgrade fee brought it down to $99.95, itâ(TM)d probably sell disproportionately better.

      And I very much suspect that if they continue this full-price scheme, theyâ(TM)re going to find their percentages of OS adoption will suffer in a few versions. Itâ(TM)s definitely not a foregone conclusion that Iâ(TM)ll be buying Panther, and if they pull this same stunt again with Ocelot, Bobcat, and PuddyTat ⦠well, my opinion (entirely that of a layman) is that their sales will suffer.

    25. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by WCityMike · · Score: 1

      (Actually, back when 10.3 was still codenamed Pinot, 10.4's codename was evidently Merlot.)

    26. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Funksaw · · Score: 1

      Dear Mr. Jobs.

      I really like Jaguar, and have it installed on my system. Furthermore, I love the security additions of Panther, and Expose looks like it will save me tons of time in frustration looking for the right window.

      I understand that you need to price the item at $129 in order to make a profit - this is understandable. I would be getting alot of great new features too, for the price.

      But, considering that I have just paid $129 last fall for Jaguar, and considering that I do not expect any upgrade problems if I decide to upgrade directly from 10.2 to 10.4, I think it might be a better idea at this time to wait another year for 10.4, and spend $129 then.

      I hope you understand.

      Cheers,
      Funksaw

    27. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      Uh, yeah. You are paying the upgrade price. See, since you can't build an Apple computer, you must buy a complete system, which includes an OS. Since everyone who runs Apple computers already has their OS licenses, Apple only ever needs to sell their retail distros at upgrade prices (and it is an upgrade price if you compare it to M$, who charges $199.99 for a Windows XP Professional upgrade).

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    28. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by seichert · · Score: 1
      Dear Mr. Jobs:

      Iâ(TM)m not saying I donâ(TM)t want to pay you guys when you upgrade the OS. You guys put a lot of features in every release, and your staff deserves to get paid for it. Panther looks pretty damn cool, for the most part. Just do me a favor. Reward me, even with a paltry amount, for being a customer who likes to keep his OS up-to-date.

      You have been rewarded. You got to use Jaguar for the last year. If it wasn't worth it then you should consider not buying Panther.

      Knock $40 off the price and call it a $89 upgrade fee. Hell, even $30, and $99, would be somewhat palatable. Thatâ(TM)s really not that much to ask, considering the discounts one can find elsewhere on the OS after a few months.

      Two questions:

      1. Are you willing to pay $129?
      2. Will you buy Panther even if you do not get a discount for owning Jaguar?

      My guess is that the answer for most people is yes and yes. That is why Panther will cost you $129 just like everyone else. You should figure you will get about 1 year of use out of Panther until the next version comes. So basically you will be paying about $10.75 / month for Panther. Sounds like a fair deal to me, buy you can choose for yourself when Panther is released into the wild. :)

      --

      Stuart Eichert

    29. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by bellings · · Score: 1

      Windows 2000 Pro came out in 2000. The upgrade price was about $200. Windows XP Pro came out in '02. The upgrade price was about $200. Longhorn is going to be out in another year. The upgrade is going to be about $200.

      So... in 4 years, you're spending $600 on the OS.

      Pleae tell me how is this different than Apple?

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    30. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by numark · · Score: 1

      Jaguar sells for $69 with educational discount right now, so it's possible you might pay less than that even. In the interest of gloating, I'll revise that to say "it's possible both you and I might pay less than that", what with myself being eligible for educational discounts as well ;)

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    31. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by geekee · · Score: 1

      Why are you comparing a server OS to a desktop OS? The server version of MacOS costs $499 for a 10-client edition. I paid $99 for WinXP home edition.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    32. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by bellings · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Windows 2000 Pro is a desktop OS. Windows XP Pro is a desktop OS. Windows Longhorn will be, I assume, a desktop OS.

      Windows 2000 Server with a 10-CAL license is far more than $499. Windows 2003 Server with a 10-CAL license is far more than $499. The server version of Longhorn with a 10-CAL license will be, I assume, far more than $499.

      Please, explain your comment to me. Do you honestly believe that the $199 upgrade versions Windows 2000 Pro or Windows XP Pro are the "server" version of those operating systems? Do you have any idea what software costs?

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    33. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I'm not going to pay a dime for a CD which is little more than a maintence upgrade.

    34. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly why are you so quick to jump to the most expensive alternative?

      Windows users, they have options. They can go for the suitable, yet lacking a few useless features like encryption and remote desktop support, or they can spend the extra hundred and go for Pro. But for most people, Home edition is fine.

      Mac users do not have the choice of a cheaper alternative.

    35. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by bellings · · Score: 1

      I was replying to a person who made the absolutely nonsensical claim that WinXP Pro is somehow a "server" version of the Microsoft OS, and made the grossly innapropriate comparison between the $199 WinXP Pro upgrade price and the $499 Mac OS X 10-client server price..

      I'll assume that you're *not* the person I was originally replying to, and agree with me that his line of reasoning was totally broken. You've certainly made no attempt to support his arguement, so I imagine this is a safe assumption.

      You're bringing up an entirely different, and totally unrelated, question -- is it more appropriate to compare the $129 MacOS X Panther upgrade with the $99 WinXP Home upgrade, or the $199 WinXP Pro upgrade. I have absolutely no desire to answer such a question, and am really only posting this reply to make it clear that I have never attempted to answer such a question. To claim that I somehow did answer that question, and that I answered it in a way unsatisfactory to you, is total nonsense.

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    36. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with this. I don't believe in the argument about how we pay for part of the OS when we buy the machine. You know it is possible to build a Mac clone capable of running OS X? Ever watched TechTV? They built one on the screensavers to prove it. Most Mac parts now adays are easily bought. It's just the processor and MB that are harder to find.. but not impossible.

      As for "you don't have to upgrade" in a way you do. Look at how much software is coming out that makes an update manditory. Safari, and a plothora of other packages. Which was the only reason I upgraded to Jag in the first place.

      Now I'm getting worried about all of the new software that's going to require Panther. Meanwhile I paid $4000 for this machine, $120 for OS X, $120 for Jag, and this machine is only 2 years old.

      Taking off $20-40 would help out. Especially for something that will be outdated within 12 months.

      Just my $0.02

    37. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this true? You can build a OS X compatible computer. While the MB/Processor is a bit tricky to find it is possible. Everything else can be bought at a CompUSA.

    38. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by CanJap · · Score: 1

      I have used Win 2000, Mac OS 8.5-10.2.6 and love mac especially with the unix intro and I love it to death now. my favorite unix of all. that linux ppc or suse ppc can go to hell. gave up on it. I like the os X environment for the unix I am learning and the beauty I look at. BUT I am totally with WindyCityMike for his opinion that 129 is a bit much for every little step we take. maybe more people would be willing to fork out 80 bucks than 80 + 50 for the step up. you know apple... no pain no gain. take less for the upgrade and maybe more people would upgrade when it comes out. especially if speed enhancements are noticed. I hate spinning beachballs. even in Jag I get it occasionally. try moving 1000 jpgs to a different folder... even on a G4 700 iMac with 640 MB ram. beach volleyball anyone? I can go for a piss, wash my hands, pop some popcorn in the microwave, scratch my ass , wash my hands again and the beach volley ball is still going on. please.. I didn't pay 129 to watch beachballs spin. if I paid 80 bucks then I'd not feel so jilted in the upgrade. ... give us consumers a bit of a break will you. and more of your customers would be a bit more loyal and give you their money. 12 x 2 or 8 x 4? which is better?

    39. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by snero3 · · Score: 1

      The answer to your problem is really quite simple don't buy every update they release. I presume you are not running mission critical servers so you can afford to wait a while between upgrades.

      10.1 is still a great and very useable OS (I am still on it, I will be upgrading straight to panther).

      Apple does not force you to upgrade (every now and then there is a software update for the older versions). You only have yourself to blame if you buy every upgrade to get the latest functions and gizmos

      --
      It said "windows 98 or better" so I installed Linux
    40. Re:Aw, frickin' crud ... by FsG · · Score: 1

      Let me ask you this: where else would you expect a product you've bought and paid for to gain new features for free just because the company that made it happens to release a newer version? If I buy a car and, the following day, the manufacturer releases an improved version for the same price, will I get the new one for free? Nope, but the one I bought will continue doing the exact same thing it was doing on the day I bought it for years to come - no more, no less. Why would you expect anything different with software?

      --
      I made a PHP/MySQL library that prevents SQL injection & makes coding easier!
  80. Holy Crap, these G5s are going to be $$$ by frankie · · Score: 0, Redundant

    PPC970, DDR3200, PCI-X 133, HyperTransport, Serial ATA, optical audio, and AGP 8x with FX5200 or Radeon9600Pro video. The specs are freaking insanely great. But at what price?

    1. Re:Holy Crap, these G5s are going to be $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      $2k for the low end, $3k for the dual proc. Could be worse.

    2. Re:Holy Crap, these G5s are going to be $$$ by xanasin · · Score: 4, Informative

      $1999 $2399 $2999

    3. Re:Holy Crap, these G5s are going to be $$$ by mekkab · · Score: 1

      Oh, there's a discount plan for education. They only take your first born if you are a student.

      (actually, I asked the same question and got a reply that Apple has been pretty consistent with the pricing of their top-o-the-line stuff. How do they do it? Volume! also, they are getting the chips from IBM, not MOTO. )

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    4. Re:Holy Crap, these G5s are going to be $$$ by Juanvaldes · · Score: 2, Informative

      1.6Ghz = $2000
      1.8Ghz = $2400
      dual 2Ghz = $3000

    5. Re:Holy Crap, these G5s are going to be $$$ by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      They are al$o going to be very fa$t... :^)

    6. Re:Holy Crap, these G5s are going to be $$$ by alienw · · Score: 1

      If by "very fast" you mean "only slightly slower than a $600 wal-mart PC," that is. Seriously, I've seen a PC at wal-mart that has a faster processor than both of their single-processor unit (~2GHz). Sure, it might not be 64-bit, but it's almost 1/4rd the price, too.

    7. Re:Holy Crap, these G5s are going to be $$$ by Jayzz · · Score: 1

      It's not a faster processor, it's a higher clocked processor with a different architecture. They are two different things.

    8. Re:Holy Crap, these G5s are going to be $$$ by alienw · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'll bet that a 2GHz Athlon would beat a 1.8GHz PPC970 at many real-world benchmarks (let's say UT2003). I don't think the IBM procs have AltiVec, and the 64-bit architecture is probably slower when running 32-bit apps. You only need 64 bits for addressing more than 4 GB of RAM. It doesn't help with speed at all. Yes, the bus speed is faster, but that may not make much of a difference for most things. Memory access speed is not usually a bottleneck.

    9. Re:Holy Crap, these G5s are going to be $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't think the IBM procs have AltiVec
      Bzzt. The PPC970 has AltiVec...
  81. Jaguar is dead--long live Jaguar! by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 1

    Jaguar, software, dead at 3

    I just heard some sad news at the Apple WWDC - Apple OS software Jaguar was found dead in Cupertino this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to Apple Macintosh users. Truly an American icon.

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
  82. Bill Gates plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    10 Copy Apple OS
    20 call it an upgrade
    30 Charge 130 bucks for it
    40 PROFIT!!
    50 goto 20

  83. someone post a pic of the new mac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone got a pic?

    1. Re:someone post a pic of the new mac? by shayborg · · Score: 3, Informative

      Look here for a couple pictures of the Mac as well as the iSight.

      -- shayborg

    2. Re:someone post a pic of the new mac? by Halo1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Original (.mac site, bandwidth will be exceeded soon probably). Mirror on my machine. Another one (side view) here.

      --
      Donate free food here
    3. Re:someone post a pic of the new mac? by Halo1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Adding more pics to the parent dir.

      --
      Donate free food here
    4. Re:someone post a pic of the new mac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks just like a plain aluminum PC case... but it's uber innovative with its carrying handles (for all those LAN parties... with Macs) and, of course, a gigantic Apple on the side.

      Oh, and it opens from the side! Damn they're good!

      Here it is... from the Apple itself.

  84. Jaguar Dead by barryfandango · · Score: 0, Troll

    This story is OLD!!! jaguar has been dead for a long time people. the only decent title on it was Aliens vs Predator.

    --
    In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Jaguar Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Tempest 2000

  85. Just goes to show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People will pay a lot of money for shiny things.

  86. OSX buttons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  87. Ars Techica Has Better Coverage by Roofus · · Score: 1

    Right Here: http://arstechnica.com/wankerdesk/3q02/wwdc-622.ht ml.

    Note the (idiot)slashcode addition of the space in the ht ml.

  88. What the hell? by rice_web · · Score: 1

    What are you smoking? $1999 for the low-end?

    --
    The Political Programmer
    1. Re:What the hell? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      The low-end pro model. The iMacs will still be around, cheaper than that. And that's for a 64-bit machine.

    2. Re:What the hell? by Leomania · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't read anything thus far to indicate that the 32-bit systems are doing to go away immediately upon introduction of the G5-based systems. $2K for an entry-level 64-bit system isn't "out there" at all in my book. It will look pretty damned fast compared to many dual 32-bit systems, methinks.

      And I'm pretty shocked at $3K for the dual-cpu unit -- that's going to be one incredibly fast machine. I don't need it but I absolutely must have it (my Mac is a 8500 upgraded to within an inch of its life... a Pinto with a V8 stuffed in there).

      - Leo

      --
      You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
    3. Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      psst. Dual units start at $2,399....

  89. I'm gonna get one on christmass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if santa brings it.

  90. Re:blowing your load early? by superspoon · · Score: 1

    Are you my evil twin? This is exactly what I'm doing...

    --


    YarrRrr
  91. Re:Panther problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    easy. NT4.0 was built for the pentium pro. Panther was NOT built for an upgraded 8600. btw, I have run both. update your machines. luser

  92. Why they've gone to names by NaugaHunter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems to me that rather than being analagous to 9.0, 9.1, 9.2, etc. OS X's 10.1, 10.2, are more like System 7, System 8, System 9. Each version has entirely new features on top of entirely different underpinnings. Apple is using the cat names as an attempt to shed the 'They're charging for an upgrade!' stigma.

    Not that I'm looking forward to the price, mind you. However, they haven't (that I've seen) given a release date, and as I'm looking to buy a new computer it probably will work out for me. Even if I weren't, I don't think my graphite iMac would take it anyway. :(

    --
    R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
  93. Re:Dear Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot... where accusing Macintosh users to be homosexual is redundant.

  94. New Safari Version by Uart · · Score: 1

    Final version of Safari is very exciting, maybe now it won't crash regularly. Does anyone else get that?> the "unexpected quit" error?

    --

    Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    1. Re:New Safari Version by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      Yep, it crashes all the time on me. I finally decided to stick with Camino. (Which is just slightly more stable)

  95. Huh? by Miffe · · Score: 0

    It comes with FreeBSD 5.0?

  96. where is the 15" powerbook?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where is the 15" powerbook?! i'm waiting!

  97. Pricing by peachawat · · Score: 3, Informative

    3 models, all available in August :

    1.6 GHz, 256 MB, 80 GB $1999
    1.8 GHz, 512 MB, 160 GB $2399
    Dual 2.0 GHz, 512 MB, 160 GB $2999 (Wow!)

    1. Re:Pricing by humina · · Score: 1

      I want to know when the laptops with this chip are goin to be available. That is going to be sweet

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
    2. Re:Pricing by alienw · · Score: 1

      Ack. Apple shaving corners again. A 256MB machine for $2000? I call that a rip-off, given that 256 megs of Crucial DDR RAM only costs $40 retail. Surely, Apple could bump that to 512 for the same price.

  98. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    Holy crap, that's not too bad. You know, if Microsoft would do that and not require online registration, I would grab XP for my wife and myself(for gaming).

    Blah, screw it. I think my wife wants a Mac anyway.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  99. Slightly OT, but good news anyway! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some info on the new G5's from www.macrumors.com.
    Basically everything Mac fans have been hoping for is true!

    # World's Fastest personal computer. Comparing spec tests.
    # Shipping in August.

    3 Models:

    1.6GHz $1999
    1.8GHz $2399
    Dual 2GHz $2999

    # Enclosures! 9 9 fans! but quieter.
    # Single/Dual processors. Up to 8GB Memory. Can talk to mem @ 6.4GB/s. 4x Superdrive in each. Geforce fx5200 in lower, radeon 9600 pro in higher mode.
    # System - G5 System Controller - dedicated bandwidth to each subsystem. IBM is fabricating it. 6x faster than G4, 8GB bandwidth, 1processor doesn't slow down the other one. 400mhz DDR memory, AGP 8x Pro, 133mhz PCI-X slots. Hypertransport. Serial ATA. 1.5GB/s bandwidth. independent interfaces to each drive. Rest of the i/o - high performance. optical digital i/o and analog i/o, fw800 ,usb 2.0
    # Introduced Dr. Johnny Kelly the 3rd on stage. "very advanced technology"
    # This is a new generation architecture.
    # Massivly parallel. Up to 250 inflight instructions. -- can be processed at the same time. The G4 can do 16. Floating point "monster". Two fully symetric integer units. massive branch prediction logic.
    # fastest front sidebus - ever. designed for dual processor systems.
    # We're calling it the G5. It is a 64-bit processor. The first first 64-bit desktop processor. Runs our existing 32-bit apps no problems.
    # The Chip - we turned to IBM several years ago.
    # We are delivering today - the Worlds Fastest Personal Computer.
    # "Premature specifications" - it was a mistake, and it's true.
    # 3 responses: 1) Can't be true 2) It's true 3) It's great marketing
    # One more thing... some of you may have noticed on the net...there was a funny thing that happened last thursday... where specifications were posted.

  100. G5's won't ship today by bobdotorg · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Photoshop guy just said, "We'll be releasing new software at about about the same time these machines ship."

    Well, my credit card, which has been quivering in my wallet's deepest darkest crevices all morning, is safe for now.

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
  101. Pay it only if it's worth it by siskbc · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Another upgrade! I just bought Jaguar for one machine about two months ago! Got to do it, though.... too much cool stuff in Panther to just pass by.

    Well, that's the thing. Is the stuff in Panther worth $129? If so, then there's nothing to complain about (except that maybe you didn't get your money's worth out of Jaguar, but that's just unfortunate timing).

    If it's not worth it, I'm sure Apple will support Jaguar for quite some time. As long as these (now semi-) annual upgrades aren't effectively mandatory, then I think it's a good thing - upgrade only when they've made significant changes to the things you like, but at least you get the option to upgrade a lot, unlike with Windows when real feature changes come once every 5 years.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Pay it only if it's worth it by WatertonMan · · Score: 1

      I personally think the rewritten Finder and open/save dialogs alone is worth $129!

    2. Re:Pay it only if it's worth it by siskbc · · Score: 1
      I personally think the rewritten Finder and open/save dialogs alone is worth $129!

      There you go! Personally, the finder doesn't get me cranked up, but their implementation of SMB certainly does, and that alone is worth $129 of my boss's cash ;)

      And really, that's the point. I think a lot of people will find $129 worth of goodness in the upgrade. Those who don't can wait until next time around when they will get all those goodies plus some more. Sounds like a good deal all the way around to me.

      Granted, it would be better if it were free, but I don't think I've ever NOT said that about anything I wasn't selling. ;)

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  102. Panther is already dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lower-level enhancements include NFS file locking, built-in X11, FreeBSD 5.0, IPsec-based VPN, and various SMB and Active Directory enhancements.

    Insert BSD IS DYING/DEAD! rant here.

  103. Pic of iSight by kawaichan · · Score: 4, Informative
    --

    kawai
  104. Picture of New G5 by catfishmonkey · · Score: 1

    Here Crazy Lookin

    --
    The horse is dead. Either fuck it or walk away, but please stop beating it.
    1. Re:Picture of New G5 by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      *BOING*

      When teh Mac first came out I openly laughed at the silly little machine and the people who used them.

      Now I want one. o_O

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  105. Intergrated X11!!!! by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 4, Informative
    The one reason that I thought that OSX was too little when it was released was that it had no native support for X applications. With built in X11 support, this should make OSX a full-fledged *nix-compatible OS.

    This could very well pull some of the crowd who love UNIX workstations, especially with the specs on that new chip.

    1. Re:Intergrated X11!!!! by justsomebody · · Score: 1

      I love *X workstations, and I can say "Not interested". Too slow, too expensive.

      Yes, I have tryed MOX and didn't liked it. In fact I still have two G4's one MacOS one MOX, they mostly serve as dust collectors.

      Hey, but that's me, ...don't know for other guys

      --
      Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
    2. Re:Intergrated X11!!!! by WCityMike · · Score: 1
      Wrong.

      Directly from Apple's Panther page:

      Unix-lover Heaven

      Panther will include a final X11 client for Unix-based applications, improved NFS/UFS, FreeBSD 5 innovations as well as support for popular Linux APIs, IPv6 and other important acronyms.

      Integrated X11 is far different than "a final X11 client."

    3. Re:Intergrated X11!!!! by jimmcq · · Score: 1

      The one reason that I thought that OSX was too little when it was released was that it had no native support for X applications

      X11 for Mac OS X has been available for a while now. Sure, its not integrated, but it is available.

    4. Re:Intergrated X11!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you define "integrated" then? When you install the X11 package, you get /usr/X11R6, including headers if you choose to install them. The whole thing, from soup to nuts. You get a Quartz-based window manager, although you don't have to run it. You can drop the sources for any X11 application on your Mac and compile it. Poof. You can run any X11 application that's been compiled for the Mac and XFree86.

      What more do you want, friend?

    5. Re:Intergrated X11!!!! by Lewisham · · Score: 1

      I would define integrated in that an X11 program didn't need a wrapper application to run, as it is and, from what I've seen, continue to be. If I want to run Gimp, I want to double click the application and *tada* it's bouncing happily away in my dock. That's integration. Having to boot up X11 then opening from within Gimp is not.

    6. Re:Intergrated X11!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then tell those lazy Gimp developers to port it

    7. Re:Intergrated X11!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give them to me, I am poor and would like to write some software.

    8. Re:Intergrated X11!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pff. If you're still talking about Gimp, you're obviously so far out of the Mac loop as to be utterly irrelevant. Welcome to the 21st century, friend. We have this little thing called Photoshop here.

  106. sounds good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    credit card is ready, dual 2ghz G5 with dvd burner will be mine! my 400mhz sawtooth has served me well, but alas, it is time for a new desktop. this makes me rethink buying an ibook now - hmm, maybe the G5 will make its way there ;)

  107. Image of the new PowerMac G5 by kawaichan · · Score: 3, Informative
    --

    kawai
  108. Updates Anyone? by d3xt3r · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What does $129 buy you? OS, application and security updates until Apple EOL's the product. You're not just buying a OS, you're getting updates and support for the life of the product as well.

    For those who are counting, that's 5 minor releases of 10.2 since it was released and numerous security updates within 24-48 hours of the publishing of vulnerabilites.

    Oh, and it all just works.

    Nothing's free my friend. You can pay Red Hat $60/year or Apple $129. I think the Apple user experience is worth the extra $69 to support actual R&D, don't you?

    1. Re:Updates Anyone? by yakovlev · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but Apple seems to EOL products in 12-18 months, as compared to 5 years for Microsoft (YES, Microsoft is the benchmark here.)

      If 10.1 were still a supported product then people wouldn't complain so much about the forced upgrades. They could still happily run 10.1 and be reasonably confident that their machine was secure and stable. Instead, people must pay $130 to upgrade to Jaguar if they want a secure OS.

      My Windows 98 machine at home STILL gets security updates from Microsoft. I would expect 10.1 to still be getting updates until at least 10.3 is released, but it hasn't had one since mid-2002.

    2. Re:Updates Anyone? by dswensen · · Score: 2, Funny

      What does $129 buy you? You're not just buying a OS, you're getting updates and support for the life of the product as well.

      Yeah, all eight months of it.

      "Introducing Bobcat!"

    3. Re:Updates Anyone? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      Nothing's free my friend. You can pay Red Hat $60/year or Apple $129. I think the Apple user experience is worth the extra $69 to support actual R&D, don't you?

      Sure, but with Red Hat the first hit is free. You only pay more if you want more than one computer with free updates. How many machines does the $129 buy support for? Not a troll, I don't really know, maybe they are pretty leniant with it.

      Oh and BTW Red Hat do plenty of R&D as well, but it tends to be in boring stuff like advanced threading and kernel scalability etc.

    4. Re:Updates Anyone? by FrankNputer · · Score: 1

      No one's asking for free anything. But it would be nice (and I think wise) if Apple would throw a little bone to the people who supported the platform from the beginning, and give at least a token price break for their support. After all, it's the early adopters who put up the full $$ in spite of the lack of application support, and who then proceed to assist Apple in mass-testing the OS by reporting bugs & working out with the public beta applications.

      Even the Evil Empire...I mean, Microsoft ;) ...gives users an upgrade option. It wouldn't kill Apple to knock a lousy $20 off the price for people who already own the OS.

    5. Re:Updates Anyone? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Oh, and it all just works."

      then why where there 5 minor releases and security updates?

      All this guy is saying, throw a bone to the regular loyal customer. especially someone who bought there last OS 3 months ago.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Updates Anyone? by alienw · · Score: 1

      You can pay Red Hat $60/year or Apple $129.

      Why is Redhat being brought into the picture here? It's a server OS, unlike Panther. In a more proper comparison, Microsoft offers FREE updates for about 8 years after product release and the upgrades only cost $89. It's a better deal, period. I think Steve Jobs is smoking something good when a minor revision number (1.2->1.3) update costs $129 and includes minor rebadging and badly-needed bugfixes. Microsoft generally provides these types of updates (IE versions, DirectX updates, bugfixes) for free.

    7. Re:Updates Anyone? by bellings · · Score: 1

      The "server" version of RedHat costs several thousands of dollars. The $60 version of redhat is the desktop version. Do you have any idea what software costs?

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    8. Re:Updates Anyone? by alienw · · Score: 1

      I don't know what $60-per-year version you were talking about, given that they don't even have one I assumed it was some mid-size server product. For desktops, there's the $149 professional version and $39 regular. I don't think it's intended for the same niche as OS X or Windows, so the original comparison was invalid.

    9. Re:Updates Anyone? by bellings · · Score: 1
      You're right -- the $60 is not for the RedHat OS. It's the "basic" level of the RedHat network. The prices for the RedHat network are:
      • $60 per computer per year -- Basic RedHat Network.
      • $96 per computer per year -- Enterprise RedHat Network.
      I don't know where the $39 or even the $149 price you cite comes from, though -- I don't see any prices that low on RedHat's site. Their current OS price list is something like
      • $2,499 per computer per year -- Enterprise AS Operating System (Premium)
      • $1,499 per computer per year --- Enterprise AS Operating System (Standard)
      • $799 per computer per year -- Enterprise ES Operating System (Standard)
      • $349 per computer per year -- Enterprise ES Operating System (Basic)
      • $299 per computer per year -- Enterprise WS Operating System (Standard), and
      • $179 per computer per year -- Enterprise WS Operating System (Basic)


      On any comparison between Apple's prices and RedHat's prices, Apple wins. Hand down.
      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    10. Re:Updates Anyone? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      The $39 price would be for Red Hat Linux (plain old edition).

      That buys you approximately a year of updates I believe. Or you can use the demo one and get it for free

    11. Re:Updates Anyone? by alienw · · Score: 1

      On any comparison between Apple's prices and RedHat's prices, Apple wins. Hand down.

      Given that you are comparing apples to oranges (pardon the pun), I don't see where you draw that conclusion. I don't think Redhat competes with Apple at all. RHN is an optional service, anyway, like .Mac.

      I was comparing MacOS with its more eminent competitor, WinXP. XP is considerably cheaper to both purchase and to upgrade. The updates are free. I think, Apple loses, hands down.

    12. Re:Updates Anyone? by bellings · · Score: 1

      WinXP is not cheaper than Mac OS X. Where did you get such an idea?

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    13. Re:Updates Anyone? by bellings · · Score: 1

      Actually, here are some numbers:

      Microsoft WinXP Pro, full version: $400.
      Microsoft WinXP Home, full version, $300.
      Mac OS X 10.3, full version: $0.

      Microsoft WinXP Pro, upgrade: $200.
      Microsoft WinXP Home, upgrade: $100.
      Mac OS X 10.3, upgrade: $130.

      Yes, Mac OS X 1.3 upgrade is $30 cheaper than WinXP Home upgrade. If you're clalim is "Microsoft sells something -- anything -- for less than $130" then you've won your arguement. Congratulations. I was claiming that Mac OS X was not cheaper than Win XP. I'm pretty sure I've won my arguement too, hands down.

      I guess we were just arguing two different things. By the way, Microsoft also sells mice. They have more than one button. They also cost even less than $100.

      Next time, perhaps you could argue that Mac OS X is more expensive than a Microsoft Mouse. You'd win that one too.

      I'll just keep to my "Mac OS X is not more expensive than other operating systems" arguement, since that seems to be the valid comparison. I've seen nothing to contradict such a claim.

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
  109. Another pay upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love apple, but another pay upgrade? I dunno.... i just bought jaguar not too long ago, and frankly i'm not a rich man, i'm hoping (though i doubt) apple will offer upgrade pricing for Jaguar users, i'm getting rather tired of paying for 0.1 upgrades

  110. Pixlet is really efficient! by TheRealFoxFire · · Score: 1

    48 bits per pixel eh? Thats 2.5 times larger
    than uncompressed YUY2. Excellent.

    1. Re:Pixlet is really efficient! by TheRealFoxFire · · Score: 1

      ...er, 3x larger.

  111. Do the math by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

    $129.00 12 = $10.75 per month.

    In other words, if you don't buy two coffees a month from Charbucks, and instead put that money in a jar or an envelope, after a year, you can buy the new Mac OS.

    So, what's it going to be? Two cups of crappy, overroasted coffee a month, or a better OS?

    Your choice, hepkats and hipkittens!

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    1. Re:Do the math by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      So, what's it going to be? Two cups of crappy, overroasted coffee a month, or a better OS?

      Can I just have one cup of coffee, and every alternate OS X release?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Do the math by justsomebody · · Score: 1

      Coffe:) No thinking needed

      --
      Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
    3. Re:Do the math by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      So TheRaven64 sez:

      "Can I just have one cup of coffee, and every alternate OS X release?"

      But of course! "Drink Different!"

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  112. Mean while... by fred911 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ford Motors Cars FINALY admitted that acquisition of Jaguar Motors Cars marked the begining of the end....

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  113. Re:Panther problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm more bored than you are

  114. Re:Apple + PPC970 = True! -shipping August by acomj · · Score: 1

    shipping august ..2000$ and up!

    about time..

  115. G5 Photo by __aaklbk2114 · · Score: 1

    Here's a picture of the new G5 tower...

    Kinda ugly if you ask me... :)

  116. I have the 101st new feature!! by vizualizr · · Score: 0, Troll

    . . . built-in X11

    Ok, so it has built-in X11. But does it have a built-in X10 Camera???

    --
    anything i tell you will cloud your opinion.
  117. Re:Next computer will be a mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just don't try using QuarkXPress. After that you will think Microsoft has the kindest nicest licensing around.

  118. Mocking time ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember this ? It is only two days old. Point and laugh a'plenty.

  119. You're an example of why a good number of mac fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are idiots.

    Who cares what XP Pro costs, or the lastest version of AIX for that matter? The parent post's point had nothing to do with them and is based on the OS X pricing model itself.
    It's just not cool to pay for every . improvment.

  120. Not on TechTV by stevejsmith · · Score: 1, Troll

    It's not on TechTV! WHY THE FUCK WOULDN'T THEY SHOW IT!? Anybody know where to get it? I can't seem to find a site that's broadcasting it. AND WHY THE FUCK ISN'T TECHTV SHOWING IT???

    1. Re:Not on TechTV by paranoidsim · · Score: 1

      From Tech TV's Site:

      "About TechTV's owner
      Vulcan, the investment and project management organization founded by Paul G. Allen, first invested in TechTV in November 1998, purchasing one-third interest in the cable channel and website from founder Ziff-Davis. One year later, in November 1999, Vulcan purchased the remaining two-thirds in a transaction that closed on January 21, 2000. "

      Paul G. Allen, name sounds painfully familiar...

    2. Re:Not on TechTV by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      They carried it last year...*whimpers*

    3. Re:Not on TechTV by zonker · · Score: 0

      yeah i'm bummed they aren't doing it again this year. i enjoyed watching jobs announce the lcd imac last year.

  121. G5 Powermac Pictures by truffle · · Score: 1

    Check them out

    Looks too much like a l33t gamer pc for my tastes

    --

    ---
    I support spreading santorum
  122. Jaguar is dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Long live Jaguar!

  123. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by InfiniteVoid · · Score: 1

    Glad I'm not the only one...

    My first computer was a Mac Classic, but I quickly moved away from Macs for Windows, then Linux because each gave me more access to the core of the system.

    With OSX, I can still get that core access, AND have the default, out-of-the-box behavior be something easy, useful, and *pretty*.

    I'm quickly becoming an Apple fan again.

  124. Upgrade Pricing... by dgulbran · · Score: 1

    So, having just purchased Jaguar, I can certainly expect there to be no upgrade pricing for Panther?

    Ah Apple, shoving it up loyal customer's bums for over 20 years... :)

    --
    The world won't end in darkness, it'll end in family fun, with Coca-cola clouds behind a Big Mac sun.
    1. Re:Upgrade Pricing... by burnetd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well Jags been out for what 14 months now, and everyone has known Panther was coming for ages, so why did you buy Jaguar now ?

    2. Re:Upgrade Pricing... by dgulbran · · Score: 1

      Actually, it came with a new machine I bought. But I went through this with the *last* upgrade. I had *just* purchased a machine and upgraded to 10.1.x when out comes Jaguar... and Apple charged me full price. I'd had the machine less than 3 months. That's B.S.

      So people shouldn't buy software they need _now_ because something better *might* be released six months from now??! Sheesh.

      --
      The world won't end in darkness, it'll end in family fun, with Coca-cola clouds behind a Big Mac sun.
    3. Re:Upgrade Pricing... by Squidgee · · Score: 1
      Err, FYI:

      You need Jag to upgrade to Panther.

      And this got modded up... o.O

  125. Sigh. It's the price again. by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

    As much as I was hoping for G5--and yes, it is shipping in August--I'm greatly disappointed by the pricing. Yeah, it's the fastest consumer-level computer available at the moment. But these days, speed is such that it's pretty hard to justify paying a premium price for it. Apple's bottom-end G5, the 1.6GHz model, is $2000, and that's with only 256MB and no monitor. From Dell, you can buy a 2.66GHz P4 with 512MB and an 18" UltraSharp LCD monitor for several hundred less than that. Again, that's with an 18" LCD monitor. Add those features to the G5 and you're up around $3000. This is without even considering the $2400 and $3000 higher-end G5s.

    Yes, the Dell isn't as fast, but it's still damn fast. Windows has never had the sluggishness problems that OS X has had, at least not since the days of the PII. Mac users have been waiting for a speed boost to get past the point where that sluggishness is a hindrance. Now they have it...for a hugely premium price. Is it worth it? Unless the benchmarks are really, really spectacular, and you're doing something critically dependent on that kind of ultra-speed, then, no, it isn't. It's really difficult to justify paying an extra $1400+ just for bragging rights.

  126. Re:Yesterday's technology at tomorrow's prices by dbrutus · · Score: 1

    Predictive, distributed compiling seems quite nice. Mac programmers will buy just for that. The folder labels is a bone to the OS 9 UI bigots. Apple's mixing in new features with bringing over old features from 9 that weren't ready before 10.0 shipped.

  127. G5 Photo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  128. So much for the book review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell Timothy that the book review that's three headlines down is no longer needed, and to wait before posting next time :)

  129. New G5 case by Yes · · Score: 2, Informative

    See it here

    1. Re:New G5 case by bloggins02 · · Score: 1

      Seems a little bland to me.

  130. MS Pricing Plan by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

    "Longhorn users may be waiting until 2005 for their next release, but I doubt theyâ(TM)ll have spent $460 or $690 by that point on keeping their OS up to date." ...and then they will pay all of it at once, considering MS's history of pricing their OS.

    Also, this is going to come out at the end of this year. Assuming that we get one $130 update every year (including this year), then staying up-to-date through 2005 will be $390--not $690.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  131. Your "duh" factor is fairly high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows XP has a shelf-life of 3 years.

    Mac OS X stuff has a shelf-life of 1 year.

    Windows XP (staying current): $200/3 years
    Mac OS X: $357/3 years

    I find their "upgrade" policy very annoying.

    Essentially, they have none.

    Even MS gives you upgrades at 1/2 price.

    But hey, its apple, and so anything they do is okay, right?

    1. Re:Your "duh" factor is fairly high by dbrutus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple does sell a contract for 3 years worth of updates. The store's currently down but I think it's a considerable savings if you're going to upgrade to each new release.

      One thing that Apple does that's kind of neat is that they eventually release old versions of their OS for free. If you have some ancient mac and need a copy of 7.5.3, you can just download it. Windows 95, otoh, isn't made available on those kinds of terms.

  132. Another picure by p0ppe · · Score: 2, Informative
    --


    "Democracy is three wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner."
    1. Re:Another picure by cruppel · · Score: 1

      Here's another link to side view (I can hear expert melting)

  133. g5 shots by rweir · · Score: 1
  134. If Jaguar is dead... by Meneudo · · Score: 1

    and Panther is not shipping till the end of the year... whats the OS status?

    --
    ...
  135. That's HEAR, and I'm Going a bit red in Helsinki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want to put in text, but the lameness filter is kicking in.

  136. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by dhovis · · Score: 1

    Uh, dude.....

    Apple offers a $199 "family pack" for up to 5 macs in the same household. There, I just saved you $60

    --

    --
    The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

  137. Hi. Anybody knows the prices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi.
    Anybody knows the prices of these things?

    If it's below $700 I think I will buy one, next month maybe.

  138. New PowerMacs are dustbusters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    9 fans!!! Roflmao

  139. (Almost) live feed from MacNN... by Sebadude · · Score: 1

    Updated every two minutes. Sort of.

    Here. Exciting stuff

    --
    Eh.
  140. Re:Sigh. It's the price again. by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    How much is a Dell with a 1.6GHz Itanium, though? That's the comparison you should be making.

  141. Apple stock down 2.14%! by rweir · · Score: 1

    WTF?!?!?!

    here

    1. Re:Apple stock down 2.14%! by mcwop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      NASDAQ is down 2.6% as of 3:09 eastern time, so it is not out of line with the general market. Apple has some nice new products, but it had better translaet to sales and profits.

      --

      "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

    2. Re:Apple stock down 2.14%! by weave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, when I heard that they were giving away over 3,000 iSights at $149 each to all in attendence, my first thought was that Apple shareholders were going to have a stroke. Coincidence?! :)

    3. Re:Apple stock down 2.14%! by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      If they can afford to give away 3000 of them, that should tell you something about their cost to Apple. My God! It's just a 640x480 Firewire webcam in a cool looking package. Admittedly it's nicer than the crappy $40 webcams you'd find on a PC. With Apple's clientele there's probably enough people who'd pay the premium price for the quality and design.

    4. Re:Apple stock down 2.14%! by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      For a firewire VGA standard camera, it's only about 10% more expensive above what I've seen..

  142. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by nate1138 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That family license is an awesome idea. I wish I could buy PC software that way (what little proprietary stuff I use, anyway). One purchase covers the whole fam. With multi-computer households becoming incresingly common, how long until this becomes standard?

    --
    Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
  143. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by dochood · · Score: 1

    Caught it from a message up above... but thanks for the tip!

  144. Support for Jaguar? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Is there a date when Jaguar will be no supported by Apple?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  145. Jaguar is dead by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1
    Slashdot has now confirmed : Jaguar Is Dying

    Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered Jaguar community when slashdot confirmed that Jaguar will be dead by the end of this month. Coming on the heels of a recent Register article report that the average sales has fallen yet again, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. That Jaguar is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent World Wide Icon diversity test.

    You don't need to be a Bill Gates to predict Jaguar's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Jaguar faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Jaguar because Jaguar is dying. Things are looking very bad for Jaguar. As many of us are already aware, Jaguar continues to lose users. Bugs flow like a river of blood.

    The Developers are the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of their Market Share. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time programer John Galt only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: Jaguar is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    Jaguar leader Jobs states that there are 7000 copies left. How many sales are there? Let's see. The number of sales versus buying posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 Sales. For Sale posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of storage posts. Therefore there are about 700 Copies For Sales. A recent article put sales at about 80 percent of the OSX market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 Sales. This is consistent with the number of Sales Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of the TCP Stack, abysmal User Interface, the browser war and so on, Apple Computers went out of business and was taken over by Microsof who sell another Web Browser to international computing interests. Now LISA is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that Jaguar has steadily declined in Users and Developers. Jaguar is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Jaguar is to survive at all it will be among carzy Macintosh Zealots. Jaguar continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Jaguar is dead.

  146. the prices aren't bad. by your_mother_sews_soc · · Score: 1

    And to top it off, from Macnn... * Apple and IBM announce 3GHz G5 within next 12 months.

    --
    My user name was a mistake. Input wasn't restricted, my bad.
  147. So much for increasing market share! by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    I love Apple Computers. I'm typing this on an iBook, but they need to get over this "superior computer" mentality and come back down to reality. When the computer costs twice as much as the competition, it just isn't going to sell to anyone other than the Apple faithful who would spend $5000 if Jobs told them to.

    1. Re:So much for increasing market share! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That, and professionals who use their Macs to make money. (Multimedia creators, architects, etc.)

      iBooks and iMacs will still be around for people with more modest needs. These are the machines they are selling to the power users.

  148. Images from the keynote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here and here.

  149. a feature in Windows XP by ONOIML8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "a feature in Windows XP"

    Oh, then we gotta have it. Quick, get a development team on it post haste.

    Somebody else go get a copy of XP and see what else it has. If it's got it then we need it.

    And how's our BSOD development team doing?

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  150. Re:Sigh. It's the price again. by berniecase · · Score: 1

    Sigh, there is no sluggishness if you're using a fast Mac.

    I'm running on a dual 1.42GHz G4 PowerMac right now. Sluggishness? Nope. I've found that there are some important things to remember with OS X and speed:

    - You MUST have more than the paltry 256KB of L2 cache that you get with an iMac/eMac. The PowerBooks (1MB L3) and PowerMacs (1 or 2MB L3) really shine in this aspect.

    - 512MB RAM is a minimum. Anything over that just makes using the computer more pleasant. I've got 1GB in mine.

    - Got a Mac that doesn't support Quartz Extreme? Forget it - it's not worth the time. My old PowerBook Pismo is getting quite long in the tooth. It's not nearly as fast as the PowerMac, but it's still OK. If it had Quartz Extreme support, it'd be sweet.

    BTW, this is a 64-bit desktop workstation. You can't expect the prices to stay the same for something that is completely different from the G4s that we've had now for years.

  151. Panther Finder... by amorsen · · Score: 1

    ...sounds like some kind of antitank weapon.

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  152. Steve with the G5 and a Dell by rweir · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Steve with the G5 and a Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve, of course. He's so much more handsome than that Dell.

  153. Strange enough... by singularity · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am writing this from the Apple Store in Shaumburg, IL. The strangest thing I have seen is that the Apple Store website is currently down. THis is depite the fact that the only addition they have made today that is currently selling is the new video camera (so far... They just got done releasing the new G5 computers).

    Maybe that is just to make sure no rumors start circulating. I am not sure.

    The keynote has been great so far.

    Seeing the dual Xeon stutter on things that the dual G5 is able to handle without sweating is great.

    iChat AV looks nice. It will work really well when combined with Rendevous.

    He just said that Safari is going 1.0 today.

    8GB of RAM supported? Serial ATA? USB 2.0? 1 GHZ frontside bus? I said these things were too fantastical to be real. Apparently I was wrong... Glad to be wrong for once.

    Keynote just ended, nothing new for sale.

    About 120 people here watching. The most amazing thing? I got told that I could not take pictures with my camera. Weird...

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    1. Re:Strange enough... by singularity · · Score: 1

      Looks like they are lowering the price on current G4 computers, in addition to the new $1299 G4. The Apple Store employees are even having problems with the new price. Probably be able to find them on Apple's website about the same time they find them.

      And no iSights available here.

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    2. Re:Strange enough... by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

      They are having problems? What kind of problems? Fits, maybe?

  154. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did it run away after it was unleashed?

  155. Also had to say it... by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course it's dead; it's based on *BSD.

    1. Re:Also had to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "BSD is dead" is a long standing joke to people who like BSD.

      Almost every time a BSD-based OS has been mentioned on Slashdot an inevitable "BSD is dead" discussion starts.

      Personally, I think these folks need to stop believing that self-fulfilling prophecies actually happen. Just because you say X doesn't mean X is true, or will be true.

    2. Re:Also had to say it... by Mocenigo · · Score: 1
      Just because you say X doesn't mean X is true, or will be true.

      You need to believe more in Jobs. X is the only Truth.

  156. GCC Distributed Compiling by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if they just used distcc as discussed earlier or did they create another program? Does it check if the libraries and compilers on the machines are producing the same object code?

    1. Re:GCC Distributed Compiling by boots@work · · Score: 1

      Yes, the distributed build system is based on distcc. (I'm the distcc author, and I have been speaking to people at Apple.)

      There are some Apple-specific hooks to integrate with their IDE and their nonstandard precompiled header system, but it's basically the same.

      I applaud Apple for getting in touch early on and seeing what they could do to help with open source development.

      Does it check if the libraries and compilers on the machines are producing the same object code?

      I'm not sure. That has been a minor problem for distcc, because there is no really satisfactory OS/distribution independent way to check the versions of compilers and tool chains. (Red Hat users will recall that sometimes 2.96 aint 2.96). Because Apple know all the gritty details of OS/compiler versioning they can check this.

  157. is mac os like sgi's irix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never used a mac but I was wondering if you could access all the media stuff (video recording /audio recording/etc) from the comand line rather than having to use a app via gui&mouse?

    thanks

    1. Re:is mac os like sgi's irix? by alfredo · · Score: 1

      You will have to look through sites like Fink and the Darwin project to see what they have. There are a lot of good CLI apps ported to OSX either through Aqua or X11

      a bunch of links here.

      Three ***'s mean Jeff likes the site.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    2. Re:is mac os like sgi's irix? by shking · · Score: 2, Informative

      The iApps (iPhoto, iMovie, etc.) are scriptable using Applescript. For instance, there are scripts out there that hook iCal up with iTunes, so that iCal causes iTunes to start playing music at a given point in time.

      You can run Applescripts from the command line

      Applescript is anologous to VBA in the Windoze world, except that it is implemented at the OS level, rather than in each application. There's an API for programmers to hook up the Applescript engine to their code. AppleScript Studio, part of the developer tools, lets you create programs with a native Mac OS X interface, using AppleScript (instead of C++, Objective C or Java).

      --
      -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
  158. let's please make up our minds... by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 1

    Let me get this straight -- when the Mac was slower than the PC and all the Mac-zealots were saying that speed doesn't matter that much, all the PC-ers couldn't stop crowing about the Mhz gap. Now, the Mac smokes the fastest PC, and the PC-ers are saying that having the fastest computer isn't that important...

    And "bragging rights"? Are you fuckin' high? I can't remember a day on /. where there was not a baker's dozen worth of comments touting how fast someone's Dell was over the newest Mac.

    Maybe now, for the next year or so, we'll start to have Mac users tormenting the PC-speed freaks with the benchmarking-ugly-stick...

    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
    1. Re:let's please make up our minds... by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

      And "bragging rights"? Are you fuckin' high? I can't remember a day on /. where there was not a baker's dozen worth of comments touting how fast someone's Dell was over the newest Mac.

      Nobody really cares how fast a PC is anymore, except the hardware fanboys. With a bottom-end Dell you can do whatever you want, be it video compression, graphics work, you name it. For games you should get a flashier video card, but it doesn't matter for other people.

      With the Mac, there's been much grousing about how performance is sluggish on the lower end systems. That's the big difference. To get around that difference, you had to buy a Power Mac over an iMac. That increased the performance, yes, but at a price point well above a typical PC. And now the G5 is here, and it is faster than anything from Dell. Awesome. But it's not the ultimate-in-super-speed that I'm clamoring for, but just enough speed to make the sluggishness go away. It's not worth the ultimate premium price to me, and that's fine. But there's no middle ground, which is bad. I can get an iMac, which is noticibly underpowered, or I can pay two to three times as much as a Dell for a G5. That's not a realistic option.

    2. Re:let's please make up our minds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about bang/buck. When they were paying vastly more for slower hardware, we had to laugh. Now that they can either pay a little more for slower hardware or vastly more for faster hardware, some eyebrows are going up. If they can ever pay less for faster hardware, we'll join them....

  159. New G4... by singularity · · Score: 1

    At the Apple Store they just announced a new $1299 G4 available today. No specs available.

    They also said pre-orders are available for Panther, and that it will ship in September.

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  160. Re:Next computer will be a mac by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

    Troll? Mods, please have some respect for people with logged in accounts even if their comments aren't the most brilliant on Slashdot.

    Of course with any computer you have to do updates and read the EULAs. The good thing about a Mac is that the EULAs are generally straightforward, and updating via software update is a breeze-- at least most of the time. :-/

    I personally do feel it's worth the extra $500, but don't take my word for it. Go spend some time on a Mac and use it for a few hours each day for a few weeks. As you go you'll find out that it is in fact a very easy to use computer and that even for someone with a lot of computer experience not having to think too hard to use the computer is a good thing.

    Disclaimer: I'm a UNIX nut (hah) and now a Mac OS X evangelist, so take it with a grain of salt.

  161. Optional? by yerricde · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If a completely optional $120 once a year scares you away

    Optional? Hardly. Watch as new versions of application programs for the Mac platform quickly drop support for anything but the latest version of Mac OS X. Heck, even Microsoft still requires that programs carrying the Windows XP Logo work on Windows 2000 and Windows ME.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Optional? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      They're only not work if they use new frameworks that weren't available in Jaguar. Just like new apps for Jaguar only don't work in 10.1 if they use Jaguar frameworks -- most apps work on both.

      --

      mbbac

    2. Re:Optional? by yerricde · · Score: 1

      "Most apps work on both"? I was under the impression from other comments in this discussion that developers were generally quick to flock to new frameworks, forcing users to upgrade to new versions of Mac OS X. At least Microsoft provides some new frameworks for download free of charge to licensed Windows OS users via its Windows Update service.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    3. Re:Optional? by eMartin · · Score: 1

      The point I was trying to make is that Apple used to provide things like new frameworks/APIs for older OSes. That doesn't seem to be the case anymore.

      Sure I didn't expect them to give me the new OS 9 Sherlock for use in 8.x, but they did continue to update stuff like CarbonLib, and even small utilities like Disk Copy for older OSes.

      I don't care about Expose or the new Fast User Switching but I sure hope that apps continue to work with Jaguar when Panther comes along.

    4. Re:Optional? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      You were under the wrong impression.

      --

      mbbac

    5. Re:Optional? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      They're back-porting the new WebKit framework to Jaguar. So, you're golden there. Aside from some audio frameworks the only new one I can think of for Jaguar was Address Book and not that many applications use it. Quartz Extreme wasn't linked to from applications. So, I'm not sure what else could have held apps from running on both 10.1.x and 10.2.x.

      --

      mbbac

    6. Re:Optional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not sufre what else could have held apps from running on both 10.1.x and 10.2.x

      textured windows. users hate it, developers love it.

      --Random832, laptop with slashdot login on it is currently broken

    7. Re:Optional? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      I guess that is true. I hate the brushed metal windows too. Of course, I suppose they could have always asked the developer to provide an Aqua version for 10.1.

      --

      mbbac

  162. Re: repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 23, @02:53PM (#6276015)

    Thanks for posting that again, AC.

    Here is the original:
    by WCityMike (579094) on Monday June 23, @02:31PM (#6275673)

  163. If it does, Apple is dead by jocknerd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    They've been saying that they won't be like Microsoft but if they go that route, I won't buy anything else from them again.

  164. Store's back! by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
  165. Apple store is back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Apple Store is back up, with G5 pics and info.

  166. Intel Gets Bitchslapped By Apple by thedbp · · Score: 1

    All your floating point ops are belong to us.

    Faster than a dual 3.08 Xeon.

    Able to leapfrog a 533MHz sys bus in a single bound.

    Its a tower, its a computer .... its....

    THE FASTEST PERSONAL COMPTUER KNOWN TO MAN.
    And also faster than high end Unix workstations.

    I can't help it. I have to say it.
    U'VE BEEN BTICHSLAPPED YOU INTEL LOVING WEENIES!

    1. Re:Intel Gets Bitchslapped By Apple by mcwop · · Score: 1

      I will wait for the smoke to clear, but maybe I won't have to listen to the PC is faster statements anymore. The new Apple machines will hopefully speak for themselves - res ipsa loquitor G5!

      --

      "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

  167. Re:Sigh. It's the price again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn... I have to remember to send in my Slashdot member info. to work rather than post as A. Coward. But I digress....

    This whole Apple pricing thing is the usual crap, and will help to ensure that only the "elite" users (read as 'Anyone with some form of a degree and more $$ than sense') will buy it.

    The normal PC users are going to realize that 80% of the speed at more than half the cost is a better deal.

    Here's a good example (not to toot my own horn, but this is rather relevant):

    I recently (within the last month) purchased a custom built P4 3Ghz/800FSB machine from Monarch Computers (They're pretty awsome! Great prices, and for $45 over retail, they'll put all your custom parts together, set it up, and stress test everything before shipping it).

    For $1700, I received the aforementioned CPU installed in an Abit IC-7 motherboard, 1 GB of Corsair Ram, 2 80GB SATA drives (setup in a Raid 0 config for xtra speed), a Radeon 9600 video card w/128MB of ram, and a bunch of extras.

    My point is that this PC is overkill for a lot of people (my intent is to handle more video work), and it still costs a lot less than a new low end Mac. For most people, a 2 Ghz machine w/a half a gig of ram is far more PC than they'll ever use.

    If Steve-O ever gets off his "better than thou" high horse and wants to compete for the average consumers $$, he's going to have to realize what most people want to do, and adjust his specs and prices accordingly.

    Do I want a new dual 2Ghz Mac? Hell yes!

    Would I pay for one with my hard earned dollars? Not at the current price points (ahem... The unofficial price points, that is).

    And when you consider that most users of PC's have already invested in software that will not run on a Mac, your cost to "switch" quickly climbs well beyond the already outrageous prices.

    Apple: Nice machines. Not for the avg. person's budget however.

  168. I am shocked, shocked ... by Bearpaw · · Score: 1

    ... to see that Intel picked today to announce a faster Pentium 4. Gosh, what a coincidence!

  169. PUDGE HAS JUST POSTED A PLUM WITH THE NEW POWERMAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  170. Slashdot resorting to typical Journalist tactics.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahah, look, Slashdot editors resorting to tpyical "Grab your attention" headlines.

    "Let's announce that jaguar is dead, people will read our story and comment on it like the sheep they are"...

    go ahead slashdot sheep..... baaahh ... baaahhh

    A better headline, and more appropriate would be "Apple releases Panther" or maybe even catchier "Panther shreds Jaguar to pieces". You know? Something that actually says what happened...

  171. THat was fast.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    We just got the damned thing installed... have not even managed to get all the apps upgraded yet..

    Shessssh.. Slow down!

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  172. If you subscribed, you'd know this!! by Pay+The+Fuck+Up! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    New G5 Power Macs "Fastest Desktop In The World"
    Desktops (Apple)
    Hardware
    Posted by pudge on 06-23-03 12:18
    from the want dept.
    In the hardware part of his keynote address at WWDC, Jobs officially introduced the G5-based computers previously leaked on the Apple store.

    See any serious problems with this story? Email our on-duty editor.

    The new G5 machines, with the IBM 970 processor, use the "world's first 64-bit desktop processor" (and the "fastest 64-bit processor ever") but run both 64-bit and 32-bit apps natively, and run up to 2GHz. The bus is 1GHz ("fastest ever") and it is designed for dual processing and full symmetric processing.

    Beyond the many numbers, the bottom line is that the new machines have a new architecture, and that the memory speed is now the bottleneck, not the processor or bandwidth speeds. So they can have up to 8GB of 128-bit DDR RAM, as it is efficient to keep data in memory. The memory bandwidth is one of the most talked-about features of the new architecture.

    USB 2.0 is now included, as are FireWire 400 and 800, Bluetooth, AirPort Extreme, and digital audio in and out. The 4x SuperDrive is now standard, and it can house up to 500GB of internal storage.

    For video, the GeForce FX5200 is standard on low-end models, Radeon 9600 Pro on high-end models.

    The case of the new machines is redesigned too, from the ground up, focusing on decreasing noise and heat. It is an aluminum enclosure, with ports for FireWire and USB on the front, and a door on the side to get into the box. It has four distinct "thermal zones" with computer-controlled cooling with its nine (yes, nine) independent fans. And it is much quieter than its predecessor.

    The G5 is 10 percent slower than the P4 and Xeon in SPEC int scores in single-proc units, but 20 percent faster in FPU scores, and the dual-proc G5 beats the dual-proc Xeon in all SPEC scores.

    The models are a single 1.6 GHz ($1999), single 1.8GHz ($2399), and dual 2GHz ($2999). They will ship in August. A 3GHz processor will be available from IBM in 12 months.

    Apple notes that recompiling apps for the 64-bit architecture is easy, and in some cases can be done in minutes.

    There was no word about the heavily anticipated redesign of the 15" PowerBooks.

  173. Apple Store Slashdotted? by paranoidsim · · Score: 1

    thats all..just wondering.

    freaks.

  174. X11 Support Description? by kremvax · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have a link to the new X11 support features, version, description, etc? Much obliged, Kremvax

    --
    --- Little Atomo - The Amazing Thinking Robot from Atomocom! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIP9KisHi4k
    1. Re:X11 Support Description? by germuska · · Score: 1

      X11 for Mac OS X

      I don't think there are "new support features"; this page just says "Unix-lover Heaven: Panther will include a final X11 client for Unix-based applications, improved NFS/UFS, FreeBSD 5 innovations as well as support for popular Linux APIs, IPv6 and other important acronyms."

      To me, "final" just means bugs fixed. I could be wrong -- I haven't read a "roadmap for X11" document from Apple.

  175. Keynote Highlites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Steve Jobs takes the stage. [13:02 ET]
    We have so much great stuff for you today, we may need to take a break in the middle, says Jobs. [13:03 ET]
    3800 attend Keynote [13:04 ET]
    300,000 Airport Extremes have shipped. [13:06 ET]
    58 Apple retail stores: 17 million visitors so far. [13:06 ET]
    Jobs showing a rendered pic of the upcoming San Francisco Apple store. [13:06 ET]
    Later today Apple will ship its one millionth iPod. [13:08 ET]
    Apple has sold 5 million songs on its online music store. [13:08 ET]
    5 million Safari beta downloads since January. [13:10 ET]
    Safari 1.0 final will be available for download in a few hours. [13:10 ET]
    Apple also releasing Safari SDK for developers. [13:11 ET]
    Over 100 new features in Panther, the next major revision of Mac OS X. [13:12 ET]
    Mac OS X is now the most popular UNIX in the world, says Jobs. [13:13 ET]
    Panther to offer lots of UNIX features and Windows operability. [13:14 ET]
    Jobs says the old Finder was 'computer-centric' and Apple wants something 'user-centric' [13:15 ET]
    Panther features a one-column Finder, brushed metal Finder window, fast searching, an 'Action" button, the return of Labels, and New open and Save panels. [13:16 ET]
    Jobs demoes Panther. [13:17 ET]
    There is a new iChat 2 icon with a camera in the middle that Jobs has not mentioned yet. [13:17 ET]
    The searches appear tremendously fast in the new Finder. Jobs says it is "The best the world has ever seen." [13:18 ET]
    New .Mac to offer auto-syncing of files. [13:19 ET]
    Next up: "Expose" [13:20 ET]
    Expose is a new feature for organizing windows. [13:21 ET]
    Jobs says it makes it easier to find the window you are looking for. [13:22 ET]
    Expose shrinks all of the windows in order to display them all on the screen at once, so you can find what you are looking for easily. [13:23 ET]
    Users can assign any key on their keyboard (or assign screen corners) to perform this feature. Lots and ooohs and aaaahs from the audience. [13:23 ET]
    Expose uses Quartz Extreme. [13:25 ET]
    FileVault: secures a user's entire Home folder. [13:26 ET]
    It encrypts and decrypts on-the-fly. [13:26 ET]
    Mail to be optimized for Panther. [13:26 ET]
    The new Mail app will be much faster, offer Safari rendering built-in, allows you to manage your mail by threads, and Addresses are now 'Objects' [13:28 ET]
    Jobs demoes HTML emails. [13:28 ET]
    Jobs demoes thread view in Mail. [13:29 ET]
    IPSec-based VPN is built-in to Panther. [13:30 ET]
    Built-in fax in Panther -- every print panel has a fax button. [13:30 ET]
    'Pixlet' features a breakthrough new QuickTime codec with studio-grade quality -- 48 bits / pixel source data, no noticeable visual artifacts, no inter-frame compression. [13:31 ET]
    Jobs demoes Pixlet by showing a Finding Nemo trailer. [13:33 ET]
    Jobs shows Matrix Reloaded trailer. The quality is outstanding. [13:35 ET]
    Preview: Jobs talks about PDF. [13:35 ET]
    Apple has updated Preview to be the fastest PDF reader in the world. Jobs compares the render speed to Windows Acrobat 6 -- Acrobat gets trounced. [13:35 ET]
    By the way, Jobs has a small camera hooked up to the top of his Cinema display. No mention of it yet however... [13:37 ET]
    Scrolling a large PDF document is very fast in the new Preview. A search feature has also been added. [13:38 ET]
    Preview offers on-the-fly postscript to PDF conversion. [13:39 ET]
    Faster User Switching: there is now a menu in the corner to switch between multiple users on a machine. [13:40 ET]
    The Fast Switch in awesome - loud applause from the crowd. The Desktop literally spins around to the new one, kind of like Keynote. [13:40 ET]
    FontBook: handles professional font management. One button to install a new font. [13:42 ET]
    Offers a nice preview feature and instant searching. This is built into Panther. [13:42 ET]
    Jobs says he saved the best for last... iChat. [13:43 ET]
    25% of Apple customers use it routinely. [13:43

  176. Wow! by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    "NFS file locking"

    After all these years, someone finally made this work? INCONCEIVABLE!

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  177. Try using a Mac. by Llywelyn · · Score: 2, Informative

    10.1->10.2 was *not* a "minor" update by any stretch of the imagination, nor is 10.2->10.3 going to be a "minor" update (unless you call adding major features such as FileVault, an updated application suite, a font manager, iDisk syncing, a new appearance for the entire Finder, fast user switching, and a hundred other things "minor").

    10.0->10.1, OTOH, *was* free.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  178. service packs by McDutchie · · Score: 5, Informative
    At least M$ does a few service packs for free before they ask for more money with a new OS.
    Er, Mac OS X 10.2 has had 6 of them so far, from 10.2.1 to 10.2.6. That's not counting the Developer Tools updates (and M$ certainly doesn't give a world-class developer environment away for free with the OS).
    1. Re:service packs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (and M$ certainly doesn't give a world-class developer environment away for free with the OS).

      No, but they do give a second-rate compiler away for free to anyone who wants it.

      This would actually be pretty cool except that you can just get GCC, which is far superior. (ya know, it actually does optimization)

    2. Re:service packs by Stebet · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. it doesn't come with the OS, but the ASP.NET Web Matrix is one hell of a free development tool. You can create all the .NET programs (windows and console) and web pages (ASP.NET) you want, and hey.. if you want a free DB to go with that, just download MSDE, which is, as far as i know, 100% compatible with SQL Server and even feel free to redistribute it with the apps you create with the ASP.NET Web Matrix.

      Doesn't sound all that bad to me since i say: "Screw cross-platformness!" :D

    3. Re:service packs by MacGod · · Score: 1
      At least M$ does a few service packs for free before they ask for more money with a new OS.

      Er, Mac OS X 10.2 has had 6 of them so far, from 10.2.1 to 10.2.6. That's not counting the Developer Tools updates (and M$ certainly doesn't give a world-class developer environment away for free with the OS).

      not to mention the numerous security updates, which is basically what most service packs are anyway

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
  179. Safari 1.0 now up for download. by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Informative

    Get it here.

    ~Philly

  180. I used to feel that way... by Fished · · Score: 1

    I used to feel this way ... then, I realized something: Apple sells the hardware, and OS X only (well, almost only) runs on Apple hardware. So, if they started doing upgrade pricing, virtually *everyone* would get the upgrade. Also, bear in mind that they are developing a full-blown OS, easily comparable to MS, for a small fraction of the market that MS has. It's a wonder that it's comparable in price, much less cheaper.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:I used to feel that way... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      Well, Apple isn't abusing an OS monopoly to prop up other divisions that are bleeding cash faster than most companies make it. Wasn't the case that MS could sell XP Pro for something like $40 a copy and still make an above average profit if they weren't using the money to push other (expensive) ventures like the X-Box? The difference is, Apple prices their product at a level that makes them money, but without abusing the customer. They simply can't afford to.

  181. No intel version... by Kindaian · · Score: 1

    Bah!

  182. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
    is to dumb to stop using Apple products

    In the future, try to keep your errors a minimum of two words away from the part where you call someone dumb.

  183. In that case.... by gotr00t · · Score: 0, Troll
    Once again, this article was way past due. Way to go Slashdot :)

    Yeah, go ahead, mod this way down.

  184. No bitching about the price? by Cereal+Box · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find it curious that many of you will bitch and moan about how expensive MS operating systems are but find Apple's pricing of OS X releases agreeable or complain very little. Looking at the list of "features", this basically looks like a $129 fixpack. Various app speedups, minor enhancements, and slight UI changes for a few apps is worth $129 and Windows is too expensive?

    Consider this: I can go out right now and buy a FULL, non-upgrade OEM copy of Windows XP for $99 (plus the negligible cost of a small piece of computer hardware to make the deal legit) to update a system with Windows 98 installed on it. That's $99 for what is a very serious operating system overhaul. Compare this to upgrading OS X 10.2 -> 10.3, which costs $129 for what amounts to a bunch of fixes (and an update to the FreeBSD 5.0 core -- that's relatively major, but not as major as Win9X to NT).

    And Windows is too expensive...?

    1. Re:No bitching about the price? by burnetd · · Score: 1

      Now lets see, how many stupid comments did you make here.

      list of features...what list of features, all I've see are a few hand picked features out of over 100. Perhaps you should actually watch the keynote and get a clue.

      You can buy OEM....yes you can, and Microsoft could turn around and tell you they don't support your copy as OEM copies come with computers and are not for seperate sale.

      You can buy...Windows XP. Oh and does that work natively on a Mac.

      Windows XP for $99... that will be the home version, the one that you're not allowed to use as a web server or a terminal server, or any type of server that isn't a file and print server (hint read the EULA). A cut down version of a more expensive 2 year old OS.

      Windows XP for $99. And how much did it cost on the day of release before M$ realised no one wanted it.

      I'll stick with $129 Thankyou!

    2. Re:No bitching about the price? by Cereal+Box · · Score: 1

      Now lets see, how many stupid comments did you make here.

      No more than you just have.

      list of features...what list of features, all I've see are a few hand picked features out of over 100. Perhaps you should actually watch the keynote and get a clue.

      It stands to reason that if you're only going to summarize the list of features that you're going to list the most significant features instead of a couple randomly-selected ones. That's like saying that if I were to summarize the differences between Windows 98 and Windows XP I'd list "new media player" instead of "completely different kernel that dramatically improves stability." Therefore, we can conclude that unless these really are just randomly-selected features being listed on Slashdot that indeed the "most significant" features were listed and the ones not listed are less significant.

      You can buy OEM....yes you can, and Microsoft could turn around and tell you they don't support your copy as OEM copies come with computers and are not for seperate sale.

      Wrong. If they weren't going to support OEM copies that didn't come with a new PC they'd either have to find some way to TELL if it was really sold with a new PC or disallow OEM copies entirely. The practice of selling OEM software with hardware has been around for a long time and if there were any legal problems associated with it we wouldn't have major retailers selling OEM copies, now would we?

      You can buy...Windows XP. Oh and does that work natively on a Mac.

      That has nothing to do with the topic at hand, which concerns only how much OS releases cost versus how significant the changes are for the amount paid.

      Windows XP for $99... that will be the home version, the one that you're not allowed to use as a web server or a terminal server, or any type of server that isn't a file and print server (hint read the EULA). A cut down version of a more expensive 2 year old OS.

      There is nothing restricting you from using software like Apache, or a 3rd-party terminal server, or an FTP server, or an application server, etc. with WinXP home. Microsoft-supplied software will of course have hard limits on connections (10 concurrent connections to shares, for instance). And even if it is strictly forbidden in the EULA, who cares? Since when have concerns over EULA violations or copyright violations ever stopped geeks before?

      Windows XP for $99. And how much did it cost on the day of release before M$ realised no one wanted it.

      A lot more "no ones" seem to want it than Mac OS X.

    3. Re:No bitching about the price? by presearch · · Score: 1

      Yeah, run Windows. Good for you. Sure wish we could run Windows.
      Post on Mac threads like this to tell us how nice it is.
      It's a good thing you posted this or none of us would
      have ever known the joys of the Windows world.
      I wish I had mod points because you're so informative

    4. Re:No bitching about the price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can upgrade Win9X to WinXP for $99... I can upgrade my Apple II+ to OS X 10.3 for $129. I'm pretty sure I can fit the CDs into the floppy drive, just need to fiddle a bit...

    5. Re:No bitching about the price? by afantee · · Score: 1

      How stupid can you be to compare XP Home with Panther? It may be just $99, but still a POS.

      It's clear that Panther in its current form is already way cooler than Windows 2005 Longhorn could ever be. You really have to watch Steve in QuickTime to appreciate how far Apple is ahead of MS.

    6. Re:No bitching about the price? by alienw · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've used both XP and OSX 10.2, and I'd say XP is better (though Linux is my favorite). The fonts look better on XP -- none of that anti-aliased blurry shit, just sharp, crisp fonts. Also, the UI doesn't get in the way as much as Aqua once you turn off the butt-ugly Luna theme. Finally, it's much less of a pain in the ass to set up hardware -- apple is sometimes easy but can often be a real bitch (ever try a non-Apple-installed DVD-ROM drive?). WinXP is generally pretty good about hardware support.

      I'm not sure what else makes apple "ahead" of everyone else. There's iTools, but unless you like dumbed-down, candy-coated software made for the clueless, I don't see any reasons to use it.

      I don't know what's so special about Panther, given that it's mostly bugfixes and minor UI changes.

    7. Re:No bitching about the price? by afantee · · Score: 1

      I use both XP and OS X too, and everything just looks so much better on OS X, smooth anti-aliased text, scalable icons, soft shadow, transparency, color scheme. Luna is just a cheap and amateurish copy of Aqua. Take a closer look, XP doesn't even draw window frame smoothly, and often leaves long trail of ugly broken frames behind when a window is dragged quickly.

      MS just don't know how to design UI, and it shows everywhere - stupid things like placing Shut Down in the Start Menu really insult my intelligence. In terms of usability and stability, OS X wins hands down. My iBook runs for weeks or months without rebooting and it sleeps and wakes in a second or two, while most PC users shut down their machine at least daily and XP still crashes.

      Based on MS road map and recent leaks, Longhorn doesn't even match Jaguar, let alone Panther. You have to watch Jobs keynote to see why Apple is so far ahead of MS. There are so many features like the user-centric Finder, Expose, FileVault, live searching, fast user switch with stuning visual effect. While Quartz Extreme (GPU-based window rendering) has been available in Jaguar, MS is only planing to do that in Longhorn which is still 2 years away.

  185. fugly! by wattersa · · Score: 1

    That is without a doubt one of the worst-looking Apple products I have *ever* seen. It looks like a complete departure from the aesthetically pleasing (despite the plastique) G3/G4 form factor. It's all boxy and metallic and the handles don't look quite right. The last "fugly" Apple product I would compare this to is the disastrous 17" CRT studio display with clear plastic so you could see the mess of internals. Apple, WHAT ARE YOU THINKING?

  186. with an opteron... by arhines · · Score: 1

    ...at 1.8GHz it would probably actually be cheaper than the P4. Not that we'll ever see an opteron system from dell though.

  187. What a kick... by ahbe · · Score: 1

    Ok, this whole frenzy over WWDC has been a blast. But this tops all, I just took a look at apple's online store (slowwww). The graphic that was accidently leaked of the G5 specs is the only image now that is not updated! HA! It just seems way to funny to me, the whole page is G5, except for that one graphic. Someone's having fun.. hahahaha...

  188. .torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, anyone have a .torrent for the Panther developer release up yet?

  189. available! by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    sfari 1 and the new ichat is on saftware update and at apple.com!!! yes!! posting with safari 1!

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  190. Profit Margins by Detritus · · Score: 1
    Dell has much lower overhead than Apple. Apple has to spend a great deal of money on engineering and software development. That requires higher profit margins.

    Even so, the price difference between comparably equipped Intel and Apple systems is not that big.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Profit Margins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, after you ignore the ridiculous non-commodity hardware (I'll upgrade to GigE NICs after they're down to $30, thanks) the price difference between Apple and screwdriver shops is now only about 40%. Still painful, but no longer astonishing.

      Covering R&D requires higher total net profit on sales, not a higher margin per box. If they can halve their margin and double their sales, they should--they'd have better economies of scale and a larger market for upgrades.

  191. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by mausmalone · · Score: 1

    As for me, Windows has always worked just the way I wanted it to all the time. Also, it's the ultimate cheap machine.

    After all, this is where all the good Warez are.

    $500 for Photoshop? Not according to my pal Kazaa. :)

    --
    -=-=-=-=-=
    I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
  192. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is this condescending asshole and why is he impersonating Steve Jobs?

  193. Panther also supports "important acryonyms"! by i_am_pi · · Score: 1

    from apple.com's preview:
    Panther will include a final X11 client for Unix-based applications, improved NFS/UFS, FreeBSD 5 innovations as well as support for popular Linux APIs, IPv6 and other important acronyms.

    This is why I love Apple... That, and their entire "copyright protection mechanism" on the iPod is that little sticker that says "Don't steal music".

  194. Jealousy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    "A new feature called Expose allows minimizing into a smaller window, all open windows, to temporarily move everything out of the way, sort of like workspaces."

    Have you seen the demos of it? Knock it all you want, it's nothing like workspaces. It's a flashy new feature that nobody has ever seen before. And of course, the Linux d00dz must express their jealousy by trying to put it down. "Oh, that's not so special." Well actually, it is very new, cool, and imaginative, and I expect to seem some pale imitations of it in KDE/Gnome after a while. And you know what they say about imitation and flattery.

  195. Apple's ubiquitous humor.... by Vengie · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the panther preview section....


    Unix-lover Heaven
    Panther will include a final X11 client for Unix-based applications, improved NFS/UFS, FreeBSD 5 innovations as well as support for popular Linux APIs, IPv6 and other important acronyms.


    "Other important acronyms" hehehe ;)
    --
    When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
  196. Available as a preview release? by Builder · · Score: 1

    Where does it say that ? They do have a preview which outlines what it will have, but near as I can tell, you have to be a paying ADC member to be able to get a copy now.

  197. Read the obituary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  198. KILL ME NOW! by gerardrj · · Score: 1


    FINDER IS BRUSHED METAL IN PANTHER!!!

    yes I am yelling. It's ugly, it breaks Apple's own stated uses for brushed metal, and it has less functionality than the standard windows, while wasting more space.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  199. oh man they are so dead by bob+dobalina · · Score: 1

    so when will Apple go bankrupt/get bought out now? I'm sure they spent their entire year's profit on this keynote address. I hear their marketing budget for this new OS is bigger than their development budget. Oh wait, that's microsoft.

    --

    B

    "I'm payin' taxes, but what am I buyin'?" -- James Brown

  200. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm looking forward to pirating this version once we get it in at work. Thank god they don't have that annoying copy protection shit like Windows does.

  201. mac problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Mac fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Mac (a 8600/300 w/64 Megs of RAM) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder. 20 minutes. At home, on my Pentium Pro 200 running NT 4, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Mac, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.

    In addition, during this file transfer, Netscape will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even BBEdit Lite is straining to keep up as I type this.

    I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various Macs, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a Mac that has run faster than its Wintel counterpart, despite the Macs' faster chip architecture. My 486/66 with 8 megs of ram runs faster than this 300 mhz machine at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that the Macintosh is a superior machine.

    Mac addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Mac over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.

    1. Re:mac problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You again? You're not comparing (and pardon the pun) apples to apples.

      Interesting you don't mention anything about your hard disks on either box, which is, afterall, the source of your problem.

      Has it ever occured to you that there's something WRONG with your computer? I still use my 8600 and I copy 100 megs around in a matter of minutes from ZIP DISKS to the SCSI hard drive..

      So why don't you stop complaining on various mac threads and take a look at fixing your hard drive problem.

  202. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by roskakori · · Score: 1
    If the Apple store was up right now, I'd point you to the "Family License" version that costs $199, and is good for up to 5 computers.

    actually, i tried to buy a family license back then when jaguar came out. however, i couldn't find a shop that sold it. all of them had the single license version, but claimed that there is no point in having the family license in stock because "nobody every asks for it".

    eventually i bought a single license and installed it on 3 machines. why do they have to make it so hard to be honest?

    (i can't order it online. i don't have a credit card because i don't see any reason why a bunch of greedy people that waste a lot of money on advertising should get 3% or more of everything i buy. i'd rather give these percents to those people who provide something valuable to me.)

  203. Ooh, the irony... by TrentC · · Score: 1

    MS may be evil, but they never forced me to buy a new version of windows to get the latest web browser.

    Well, not yet.

    Jay (=

  204. Compared to what? by Leomania · · Score: 1

    These machines would appear (based upon the information released thus far) to represent the most significant leap forward in desktop processing power and (to me, most notably) I/O performance that's within the reach of consumers. Try finding a dual-CPU Itanium system for home, and even if you can, at what price?

    No, I'm glad to see these systems priced this low. Apple is first out the chute with a 64-bit desktop offering and it's kinda surprising that they're not trying to milk it more for a few months.

    I for one am starting to put some money aside now so I can buy one when Panther is included in the system at years' end. Gotta replace the 8500, and this seems like a moderate upgrade. ;-)

    - Leo

    --
    You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
    1. Re:Compared to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me just ask this... what the hell do Mac users do with really fast computers like this? Obviously it's not play games since most good games aren't even available for Macs (Battlefield 1942 for instance). Do you guys just run Photoshop benchmarks all the time or something? My little 800MHz G3 iBook is just dandy for everything I've thrown at it and I can't see what more you'd need on a Mac platform. On my AMD box I play games on it so I can understand speed, but on Macs, feh. It's a waste.

    2. Re:Compared to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me just ask this... what the hell do Mac users do with really fast computers like this?

      Make Finding Nemo.

      What do you do with your Fry's Special P3?

    3. Re:Compared to what? by alienw · · Score: 1

      Actually, most movies these days are at least partially made with Linux PCs. No, not rendered on a cluster, MADE on a Linux workstation. And it's for real movies and their special effects, not Disney animated 3D trash.

    4. Re:Compared to what? by broeman · · Score: 0

      When talking about about Disney 3D trash, you mean Pixar right? hmm, who is the president of that company again? Steve Jobs that is! Eventhough he is a Mac-founder, many of the machines at Pixar is runned by Linux-clusters(and desktops), but nobody talked about hardware ... It might be that there are Macs everywhere, just running Linux and/or Darwin. I think that is what the G5 is build for at least.

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
  205. XP catch-up release (flamesuit on...) by mccalli · · Score: 1, Insightful
    OK, I'm wearing my flame-retardant attitude now...

    I hate to say this, but it looks like a bit of a Windows XP-catch up release to me. As a regular and happy user of both operating systems, I say there are definitely useful things missing in OS X that XP has by default. Faxing for one - news in the developers conference, but Windows has had that as standard since 1995. Fast user switching - an absolute god-send to me, and extremely welcome. But again, it's an XP catch-up feature. Video conferencing? Snap - a catch-up with Netmeeting.

    Now, that's not to say I'm disappointed with things. Personally, I think a pause to fill in the missing gaps is welcome, and I'll definitely appreciate not having to remote desktop to my PC to send off a fax. There are also some nice new Mac-only features to go coo at, but on the whole I'll stick by my opinion that in terms of functionality at least, this is a catch-up with XP.

    One thing I am disappointed in is Safari 1.0 however. Using it at the moment, and I went back to all the sites I'd reported as being rendered incorrectly - they're still rendered incorrectly. Not one bug fixed. You also can't block images coming from a particular server - a feature I use a lot in Firebird, can't tab onto drop-downs and you can't set your homepage to be a group of tabs. A massive let down. It hasn't done nearly enough to become my default browser yet.

    Also disappointed not to see an iSync update - Symbian-based phones aren't properly supported at the moment, and since most of the smart-phones sold in the UK at least are Symbian-based then that's an itch that needs scratching.

    Overall happy then, but I still think this is a bit of a catch-up rather than anything revolutionary.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:XP catch-up release (flamesuit on...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't been able to network fax in Windows since 2000. You have to use third-party software.

      Nice try.

    2. Re:XP catch-up release (flamesuit on...) by mccalli · · Score: 1
      You haven't been able to network fax in Windows since 2000.

      I don't know about that - I use the fax feature with a directly connected serial-port external modem. That, at least, has been there since Win95.

      Nice try.

      Look - don't take operating system choices as territory to be defended at all costs. They're just tools. I use a combination of OS X and XP for home and home office, NT4 and Solaris at work, Symbian on my phone and Linux on my co-lo server box. Each OS has its plus and minus points - defending one or the other to the death is just ludicrous.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    3. Re:XP catch-up release (flamesuit on...) by goon+america · · Score: 2, Informative
      You also can't block images coming from a particular server - a feature I use a lot in Firebird,

      sudo ipfw add deny ip from any to host_name

    4. Re:XP catch-up release (flamesuit on...) by GlassHeart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I hate to say this, but it looks like a bit of a Windows XP-catch up release to me.

      There's feature as it appears on a bullet list, and there's feature that's worth using. Apple was not the first to come up with an portable MP3 player, or probably even a hard disk based MP3 player. Yet the iPod is among the best portable MP3 players in the market, if not the best. iTunes was not the first MP3 player and organizer. Final Cut Pro was not the first video editing software. MacOS X is not the first Unix descendant to try to make it on the desktop.

      I suggest a little benefit of the doubt for a company that has been playing a brilliant game of catch up for the past couple of years.

    5. Re:XP catch-up release (flamesuit on...) by mccalli · · Score: 1
      I suggest a little benefit of the doubt for a company that has been playing a brilliant game of catch up for the past couple of years.

      Oh absolutely, please don't misread my post. I bought a 12" Powerbook a few weeks ago and am extremely happy with it. I also used to own a Mac in the System 7 days (have a look at Startupfrills for a bit of fossilised freeware I wrote back then), and I'm definitely pro-Apple.

      It's just that the comments so far have been a bit too gushing in my opinion, and a little more realism might be nice. There were features from XP that I missed when using the Powerbook, user switching being the main one, and it would be remiss of me to claim otherwise. I think that the features being added are solid, worthwhile additions and I welcome them. However, from what I've read so far I regard this as workman-like progression rather than a new leap into a wonderful world.

      That's fine. Sometimes, workman-like progressions are what's needed. Now on the new hardware front however, I'll gush with the rest of 'em.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    6. Re:XP catch-up release (flamesuit on...) by whitegold · · Score: 1

      I'm inclined to agree to some extent...

      Not much here really impressed me as nearly as "innovative" as implied, considering much of it is already available on XP.

      I don't think it's unreasonable to say much of this is Catch Up territory. I don't doubt in some ways it will catch up, and in some ways it will leapfrog over. That's pretty much a given. Anyone who thinks Apple and MS don't watch each other's GUI and functionality developments very closely is highly naive.

      I think we'll see versions of Windows and MacOS running quite neck and neck for some time, matching, improving, etc. Take a look at Longhorn, for example, and I think that many of the innovations in that will be "coincidentally" matched by Apple products closer to time. Of course, the Apple faithful will claim MS stole the idea by sneaking back through time itself...

      Anyway, it's all good. I'm a PC guy myself, but I'm always pleased to see our toys evolve...

      Matt

    7. Re:XP catch-up release (flamesuit on...) by whitegold · · Score: 1

      I would agree with this.

      For all people say that Apple is "innovative", I wouldn't agree. I think that what they're best at is taking existing ideas, styles, products, etc, and re-packaging them far better than anyone else has done.

      Is that innovation? No. But it still makes for good products.

  206. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  207. Why Switch? by TheAvatar666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Honestly, I see no point in switching. Who's gonna pay 129 dollars just for a brushed-metal finder? No performance enhancements, no nothing. Those improvements in the network are are nice, but I still think it's worthless, specially because most people don't care whether NFS lock works or not. I know people are gonna bash me like crazy because of this (curse u apple lovers :p), but u guys are /.ers not people who are alienated about computers, as most people in the world are.

    1. Re:Why Switch? by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
      Have to agree - it was something of a letdown, far from the exciting introduction of Jaguar. I don't know whether Apple's lacking imagination now or just facing the limitation that most of its installed user base doesn't have sufficiently powerful hardware to make a more adventurous OS upgrade viable.

      If the new G5 hardware sells at all - far from a certainty in this economy - we can expect cooler stuff down the road. For the time being, I'll take a pass on Panther - Jaguar's doing just fine on my machine.

    2. Re:Why Switch? by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      He said there were over 100 new features. He covered maybe 7. I'd wait until the thing is shipped before pissing and moaning about how disappointing it is. Personally, the revamped Finder and new network code, along with AD integration are all key features for me and my school's network.

  208. HA HA sense of humour at apple by panck · · Score: 5, Funny
    On the Panther page look at the right side column on the bottom under "System-wide enhancements".

    Unix-lover Heaven. Panther will include a final X11 client for Unix-based applications, improved NFS/UFS, FreeBSD 5 innovations as well as support for popular Linux APIs, IPv6 and other important acronyms.

    Well, that belted a laugh out of me.

    --
    "What thou shalt not, I shalt did!" -Bart Simpson
  209. Incremental Linker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It removes the need to link; onnly link objects you need to launch.

    Is this incremental linker? (Actually sounds more like on-demand-linking which is even more progressive). Incremental linking was on my wishlist for GNU tool chain for a long time. I wish they did this work based on GNU linker so that it will be released to public.

  210. Wheres the .torrent??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I am an AC.

  211. Re:Free upgrades for life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't expect free upgrades for life do you?

    Yeah, what do you think this is, Linux?
  212. Re:Forced upgrades by gumpish · · Score: 1

    I'm still pissed at Apple for not supporting Java 1.4 under 10.1

    I expect they will pull the same shenanigans when Tiger (1.5) becomes available.

  213. I think you're missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OS X.1, X.2, X.3, are service packs to the same OS X code.

    You have to pay full retail to get those updates. There is no bonus for loyalty (I looked on the site, there is a "family plan", but that's about it.

    I've bought OS X Beta, OS X, OS X.2.

    I'm not going to pay $130 again. I'll simply download it from the web. I've had it with these policies. After paying almost $300 to Apple, AFAIC, I'm entitled to any OS X.x.

    As to your other points, 7.5.3 is "free", but where's 8? Where's 9?

    So much for generosity.

    1. Re:I think you're missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you tell 'em! If you can't afford it, steal it! If you don't like their policies, steal it anyway! You deserve a copy because...the Constitution must say that somewhere...let me see...life, yup...liberty, yup...pursuit of happiness, uh huh...Hmm...free updates to your computer...damn, I know it's here somewhere.

    2. Re:I think you're missing the point by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      OS X.0 had several updates as did OS X.1 and X.2, all of which were available free. If the .x are service packs, what are the .x.y updates?

      The last time I was on the Apple site, I was pricing xServes for a client proposal. They do come with a 3 yr purchase plan.

      As for free old OS versions, everything up to 7.6.1 is available with 8 and 9 not being released yet (except for the free updaters within 8 and 9).

      If you can't afford the software, stay at your OS level. I'd still be at 10.1 if it wasn't for one particular program that annoyed me into 10.2. I'll likely stay here until I buy my next mac and get a family plan to upgrade all three.

      You don't have to upgrade if what you have works for you. For a lot of people 10.1 is fine, for even more 10.2 will work just fine. When 10.4 rolls out in 2004/2005 some will make the jump while others will hold out for 10.5 in 2005/2006.

      I don't understand why you *have* to upgrade from 10.2 when you aren't getting a new mac. What's so lacking with that?

  214. "Because we can" by Shenkerian · · Score: 4, Funny
    That's not all.. On the Fast User Switching page, their final point is this:

    Because we can
    Mac OS X animates transitions from one user to another. The current desktop becomes a texture placed on a 3D cube that rotates out of view while the incoming account desktop rotates into view on another side of the cube.

    I'm glad they decided to flaunt the Quartz engine this way. And they're really doing it just because it's cool.

    --
    You tell me how "whilst" differs from "while," and I'll stop calling you a pretentious jackass.
  215. OT: I bet your "realtime" MPEG is nowhere near... by Sleepy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    [ OT ]

    >My x86 PC does that trivially. It's a 2-year-old Athlon 1400. I record TV realtime in mpeg4 (2500kbit) and mp3 (160kbit) with 30-40% CPU to spare.

    You seem to have lost the key point-- "without noticable artifacts".

    Does your *realtime* MPEG4 encoder do realtime, without noticible artifacts? I think not.

    For the record, it's possible to get "realtime" MPEG4 encoding that looks good.. but it still won't be artifact-free. That is what they are claiming here.

    Lossless and "near lossless" codecs are extremely CPU-bound.

    The Mac CPU has struggled to keep up with Intel in terms of MHz, but their "vector processor" is very highly regarded. It runs circles around Intel's SSE by a wide margin. Even with a clockspeed advantage, if SSE2 can theoretically process data as quickly as AltiVec, that would be news to me.

    Of course a good VPU system does not automatically mean better quality. But like we saw when MMX arrived... software can all of a sudden do things performance-wise that just was not possible using integer of FPU code.

    Existing codecs have been re-fitted and optomized for AltiVec. The next logical question was, if you start FROM SCRATCH... can you design a codec that targets and completely exploits AltiVec? If so, then you have the headroom to do things no one can try on today's CPU and software (for example: use interpolation to completely remove banding and artifacting).

    The answer to better quality is not always to throw more MHz at it, or tweak existing codecs. Sometimes a new design is needed.

    Having not seen the video quality or the codec in action, I can only guess. The claim to have eliminated artifacting however is very significant.

  216. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A very wise man once told me that it's unreasonable to complain about being left out of a system that you yourself choose not to participate in.

    Either go get yourself a credit card, or shut up about how awful it is not to have one. Pick one.

  217. Re:Fast User Switching by gerardrj · · Score: 1

    No, Linux doesn't. Becuase fast user switching has nothing to do with Linux.

    KDE and Gnome could get fast user switching though, as they are the programs/libraries that control user intaction with the computer via a GUI.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  218. Safari 1.0 still has an annoying bug... by justMichael · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When are they going to fix the fact that it takes forever for it to handle redirects??

    Friggin annoying.

  219. I smell an ex-Be engineer by Jeremi · · Score: 1
    Searching is "live" and a lot faster, and is more user-centric instead of computer-centric.


    Dominic Giampolo? Is that you?

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  220. Quicktime Stream of the Keynote here by coolmacdude · · Score: 1
    --

    -You may license this sig for only $6.99.
  221. The lesser of evils.. by digital+photo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Being a recent convert to the Mac/Apple fold, I find I have both concerns about these upgrade cycles and at the same time, I feel they are justified.

    Let's take a look and see what we are comparing so we aren't comparing Apples and well.. you know.

    In my mind, there are really only three platforms out there: Apple, Windows, and *nix(Linux,BSD,Solaris,etc).

    Let's look at the "cost" of upgrades for each of these, shall we?

    With Apple, it seems you pay $129 for each major revision change. People who were using 10.0-10.1 were charged to go to 10.2 and now it seems that 10.2 users(myself included) will be charged to go to 10.3.

    My experience with my iBook running 10.2.6 has been about as damn near perfect as I have ever experienced on any platform with a user interface to match. Sure I paid top dollar for a laptop which won't beat my fellow co-workers' 1-2Ghz laptops anytime soon, but I also won't be cursing at my laptop for wiping out my data either. That has got to be worth something.

    With Linux, we get free kernel and OS upgrades. However, each time I went through the upgrade process, I had to literally double check every software package and perform countless recompiles to get things right again. On average, with every major kernel release I have had to spend the better part of an afternoon performing "installation" exercises. With every minor release, I have had to recompile the kernel. I didn't pay cash on the barrel for the upgrade, but I paid for it in time.

    With Windows, it has always been a struggle. People say *nix is unfriendly. I say it is Windows which is unfriendliest of all. You have to pay about $149 for an upgrade to the OS or in my case, $349 for the "full" version of the software. To top it off, if I have any aspirations of a marginally stable system, I have to perform a clean install and not just an upgrade on top of my existing system. This results in at least a full day of work on my part in re-installing the OS and all of the applications on the system. I pay in time and money.

    Now. With that in mind, I'm looking at the prospect of paying $129 for the 10.3 version of Mac OSX:Panther for my iBook which will run better with other systems and be even friendlier.

    I think I can live with that.

    1. Re:The lesser of evils.. by digital+photo · · Score: 1

      Side Note:

      I should mention that I have used Linux from the first distro of Slackware through Redhat, Mandrake, and now Suse. I perform my own kernel upgrades and system upgrades. I install and maintain Solaris systems at work.

      I have used Microsoft products since MSDOS 3.0 through till XP Pro. I have had to deal with all the problematic and blood pressure raising incarnations of Windows both at work and at home.

      My experience with Apple products has been with my iBook and distant memories of an old Apple IIe. Both of which are happy troublefree ones.

  222. Exposé? Gratuitous accent usage... by Dahan · · Score: 1
    People shouldnâ(TM)t try to sound cool by using foreign words when they donâ(TM)t know what they mean or how to spell them... on Appleâ(TM)s Panther page:
    Trés cool
    Exposé offers three jaw-dropping new ways to work
    Too bad the accent on "trÃs" goes the other way. At least thatâ(TM)s not as bad as âoewahlah,â or âoeviola.â
    1. Re:Exposé? Gratuitous accent usage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut it, frenchy.

    2. Re:Exposé? Gratuitous accent usage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oui, oui, oui, oui!

    3. Re:Exposé? Gratuitous accent usage... by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Bad? You must be French. Where I come from,
      language serves people. I just *know* there's
      a "Soviet Russia" joke in there somewhere.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    4. Re:Exposé? Gratuitous accent usage... by tigga · · Score: 1
      I just *know* there's a "Soviet Russia" joke in there somewhere.

      It's not a joke.. It's something closer to fart.

  223. possible direction Apple is heading? by extrarice · · Score: 1

    Looking at the screen shots of the Panther Finder (http://www.apple.com/macosx/panther/finder.html), I noticed that the windows are using the same widgets, and generally has the same "feel" as the Safari browser.

    Now, Safari is based on KHTML - KDE's Konqueror rendering engine. Konqi is a web AND local file browser in one. All Apple needs to do is add a "Web" button on the left (next to "Applications", "Home", etc) and build the KHTML rendering engine into the Finder, and there you go: Web and file browser in one.

    Note that the Mail program in Panther uses the KHTML rendering engine in Safari to render HTML messages, so the framework to do this is already there.

    --
    "Jesus saves, but everyone else in a 10 foot radius takes full damage from the fireball."
    1. Re:possible direction Apple is heading? by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      "Web and file browser in one."

      Didn't a company in Redmond, WA try this already?

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  224. Re:OT: I bet your "realtime" MPEG is nowhere near. by Tack · · Score: 1
    You seem to have lost the key point-- "without noticable artifacts".

    I haven't lost anything. No such point was made to me.

    Does your *realtime* MPEG4 encoder do realtime, without noticible artifacts? I think not.

    I wasn't aware there is an option for lossless compression specified in MPEG4. If that's the case (and I don't believe it is, but I could be wrong), then you're certainly right. But assuming MPEG4 is, as I believe it to be, strictly a lossy codec, then you're not going to get around artifacting in your video without applying smoothening filters that would only further separate the compressed video from its original. That's the sacrifice you make with lossy codecs.

    I don't care to argue about processor specifics. It's completely irrelevant. I simply posted to refute the implied claim of parent poster that x86 is incapable of doing MPEG4 in real-time.

    I use mencoder (mplayer) to do my encoding. I use CBR because it's slightly less CPU intensive. CBR is, by its very nature, more likely to produce compression artifacting. I can do VBR (constant quantizing) in real-time, but I prefer to have the wiggle room in CPU usage, and since the video source is television, I don't notice the quality difference. But I have not seen MPEG4 at sane bitrates (less than 2500kbit, say) that did not yield perceptible artifacting. I'd certainly be interested in seeing your examples.

    Cheers,
    Jason.

  225. Best part ... by Amiasian · · Score: 1

    I was watching the streaming video, over 56k, and one of the few parts I could actually hear was -
    "It takes a little while longer to negotiate with France." - Steve Jobs, during iChat AV demo with Jean Marie in Paris. It works on so many levels.

  226. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by Timmy · · Score: 1

    It seems like actually being able to buy the product you can't find anywhere else is pretty valuable. Would you pay 3% for that?

  227. Have to compete?? HUH? by voxel · · Score: 1

    Apple has like 5% of the desktop market relative to the windows desktop market.

    Apple can do anything they want, there is no competition. Microsoft will continue to be "behind" in OS sophistication yet *AHEAD* in all the important ways (revenue, money, popularity etc etc etc).

    - Voxel
    "Bite my shiny metal ass." - Bender from Futurama.

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
    1. Re:Have to compete?? HUH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they have 5% of new computer sales. The installed base of Macs is much higher, about as high as linux

    2. Re:Have to compete?? HUH? by voxel · · Score: 1


      Yeah, and linux has 5% of .. yeah right.. okay the benefit of the doubt.. and Microsoft has 90% of NEW computer sales..

      You work it all out and as time progresses, Mac still only has 5%.

      --
      Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
  228. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    typical unix user, is too dumb to realize that most people don't want to know how to program a computer to be able to use it.

  229. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ps, who's going to write the nice aqua-like interface on top of the "mostly free code" and make it compatible with all apple software? you? .. being the genius that you are?

    here get out a pencil and paper and take some notes:
    buying software is not bad.

  230. mpeg4 is out; pixlet is in by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wasn't at MacWorld, but I did watch the speech over my 56K line. I was most impressed with the pixlet component of the presentation-- absolutely beautiful.

  231. Chalk and cheese comparisons... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    There's a huge difference between 98 to XP or 2000. Alot more then what you get for upgrading from 10.2 to 10.3. XP is an entirely new OS, 10.3 no matter what you say is just an upgrade to an existing OS. Based on what I've seen it's more equivalent to a major SP release from MS.

    Service Packs for Windows are just a bunch of security patches and bug fixes all rolled up into one neat package. Microsoft doesn't use service packs to roll out new software.

    The possible exception to this rule are a couple of recent service packs for Windows 9x and 2000 that have included Microsoft Windows Media Player - a DRM-laden piece of software that Microsoft is trying to push as an all-encompassing alternative to RealOne Player, Winamp, etc, and which is free to download anyhow.

    As has been said repeatedly throughout this discussion in other posts, the nearest equivalent Apple has to a Service Pack is the minor releases that it issues - ie, OS X 10.2.1, 10,2.2, 10,2.3, 10,2.4, 10,2.5 and 10.2.6. None of these cost a penny to download.

    The nearest equivalent Microsoft has ever had to a Jaguar to Panther leap (if you'll pardon the pun) is Windows 95 to Windows 98 - 98 was the same underlying OS with a few extra bells and whistles. The upgrade cost of Windows 98 was the same for Windows 95 users as it was for Windows 3.1 users.

    According to Steve Jobs's keynote address, Panther introduces 100 new features to the OS. Well, that's 100 more than there has ever been in all the Service Packs that Microsoft has introduced for all the versions of Windows.

    Comparing Windows Service Packs and these major feature-packed Apple releases is ridiculous. They are like chalk and cheese.

    Yes, there is a huge difference between 98 and XP or 2000. But have you seen how much Windows users have to pay for these new features? The difference between 2000 and XP is mostly cosmetic - have you seen how much an upgrade from 2000 to XP costs?

    Why is it so unreasonable for Apple to charge half of what Microsoft would for what most people would consider a superior product?

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  232. Re:OT: I bet your "realtime" MPEG is nowhere near. by otuz · · Score: 1

    IIRC, MPEG is just the wrapper. Codecs are pluggable.

  233. ichat standards and safari bugs by bjarthur123 · · Score: 1

    ichat is standards compliant, yet A/V only works between two macs running ichat. am i missing something? how about A/V support for AIM and yahoo?

    and safari still has bugs. this code works on every browser i've tested BUT safari:

    var foo = new Image();
    foo.onload = function() { alert("load"); };
    foo.onerror = function() { alert("error"); };
    foo.src = "foo.jpg";

  234. Have to agree by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Running for the escape pod after you activated the self destruct is probably one of my favorite gaming moments!

    There aren't many games that have had that kind of atmosphere since.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  235. Panther Needs A Better Logo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about this one? http://www.greendragon.com/bb/viewtopic.php?t=94

  236. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For larger companies with high volume (like Apple) it's more like 0.75-1%. The 2.5-3% number you hear usually comes from businesses like the terriyaki joint down the street.

  237. Mac Parts by otuz · · Score: 1

    You get spare parts thru authorized mac shops if you trade in the broken parts, practically "life time" supply of spare parts (Sun Remarketing sells parts for the really old hardware).
    I don't know how much the 'premium' is, because I haven't had a broken mac ever. I'm writing this on my 14:th Mac.
    I am a Mac-user since late 80's.

  238. So much for getting the smart ones to switch! by dave1212 · · Score: 1

    Glad you bought a Mac, but you are seriously misinformed. I'll let the AC who doesn't get to normally be seen have a voice first:

    " That, and professionals who use their Macs to make money. (Multimedia creators, architects, etc.)

    iBooks and iMacs will still be around for people with more modest needs. These are the machines they are selling to the power users."

    -AC


    As for myself, I'm not so sure you're aware of exactly what the "competition" consists of.. seems that you think the build-to-order Windows machines on Dell's site are the competition. Apple's market is much more broad than just Windows users.

    We want a machine that will enhance us in some way, to let us be productive instead of getting in our way as we go about our use of the tool that is in the end just a computer.

    Whether it's audio, film, science, coding, or any of the numerous jobs/applications that these Macs will do, they do and run them at blistering speeds, and hold their value for a long time.

    1. Re:So much for getting the smart ones to switch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Professionals, huh? Just curious: what do you, personally, do for a living? A lot of the things you are describing, a Linux or other Unix box will do just fine, if not better.

      Please don't respond to this by criticizing the GUIs or desktop environments on these systems, because that shows a bit of ignorance as to the wealth of professional tools available on the platform. Criticizing GNOME or Motif or something will not go very far to argue that SGI Irix is no good for media editing, or that Solaris and Linux are bad for development ...

      And a PC running Linux will definitely cost you a lot less than a Mac. Linux, believe it or not, with the right software, is a pretty good way to do some heavy duty computing. I think the best way to go with Linux is to steer clear from projects like GNOME and KDE, which are very counter-usability. Don't bother with those packages. Use some lightweight window manager. Other than that, you can find software for just about anything you would need, computing wise. And a lot of that is from ports of older Unix stuff, even.

      But if you use a Mac, more power to you. In fact, back in the day, NeXT filled a lot of those niches, and Mac OS X is the new NeXT. Unix is my bias. Can you tell? :)

      PS: You sound a little too much like an Apple ad, even in the words you chose. :)

  239. XCode and Objective C (and project builder) by AnEmbodiedMind · · Score: 1
    So, does anyone know why Apple leaves their flagship language environment Objective-C out of the capabilities of XCode (as described here)

    Also, how does the XCode IDE relate to Project Builder? is it the replacement, new version, or complementary software?

    1. Re:XCode and Objective C (and project builder) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, look at the screenshot. There's Objective-C code there.

  240. Because, prudence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I don't understand why you *have* to upgrade from 10.2 when you aren't getting a new mac. "

    You don't *have* to do anything except pay taxes and die, but OS X.0 sucked. X.1 sucked a little less, and now X.2 sucks even a little less.

    It has a long way to go.

    I've paid $300 to be a beta tester essentially. Its time for payback.

  241. I'm not "using" my copies of 10.0 and 10.1! by CreateWindowEx · · Score: 1
    Well, I'm hardly "using" the OS security updates on my "copies" of 10.0 and 10.1, since I'm running 10.2 now. By linking the more quickly changing media technologies to a paid OS point release, plus releasing 1st party apps that only run on the latest version, one feels much more "forced" to always have the latest Mac OS, whereas in Windows you have the independent DirectX and IE releases that let you have a 3-4 year old OS and not feel penalized, even for running games and other "bleeding edge" technology.

    Granted, Apple must amortize their OS development costs over a much smaller user base, and so one expects to pay somewhat more for Mac OS than Windows (although they do have the closed hardware platform as another revenue stream, as well as a vastly reduced set of hardware to test against). However, it would be still nice to get even a nominal discount from Apple for upgrading one's OS annually. Given that most rebate programs tend to get less than 10% participation (shh!!), a $15 rebate would make people "feel good" and probably not cost Apple much at all...

    Economically, probably those of us who upgrade annually are likely to do it anyways, so Apple is probably making the right choice financially to soak us, but they could at least whitewash it a little more so we can continue to lie under the pleasant thrum of the Steve Jobs reality distortion field while we eat our food pellets and the AIBO mows the chem-lawn outside...

  242. Excited about Jaguar by clf8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not suprising, but most the comments here are about either the new G5s or the cost of the upgrade. But, if you look through the features, IMHO there's some pretty cool stuff. Sure, I've bought all the updates. Sure, I'm annoyed that I gots to buy another (or time my system upgrade just right). Sure, I'm a complete Mac fan. But in looking at 10.3, I said wow more than a couple of times.

    1. Expose - This actually looks really useful. You can never have too much screen estate, and although I might prefer a virtual screen functionality, maybe I won't care. This easily lets you not only sort through the clutter for a single app or all apps, it keeps everything the way it way (just with the new window on top). No more minimizing then having to bring back to the top. Right now, I'm running Win2k and even with my Taskbar at three levels, I've got so many terminals up it's disgusting. I'm pretty sure this is a completely new concept, but I'm sure someone will tell me otherwise. I can prolly still patent it tho....

    2. Multi-User- Ok, this isn't huge. X has allowed Unix to do it for years, and XP beat OSX to the punch. But, in classic Apple style, they map the various users onto a cube and rotate that to go between users "because they can." Waste of proc power? No, cuz it's Quartz and the graphics card is handling all that. Useful? No. Supacool, I think so. Hopefully you're not limited to 6 multi-user logins though.

    3. File Vault - 128bit automatic encryption/decryption of your home directory. Of course, I'm sure this slows the system and I would probably turn it off, but it's certainly viable for enterprise users. Until you lose the key, of course.

    4. Font Book - I'm not a graphics guy, I'm a low level embedded software freak. But, I hear those graphics people have a lot of fonts and for some reason, have all sorts of finding the one they want. Well, here's Font Management built right into OSX.

    5. X11 - Frankly, this is a no brainer. Any argument that the Mac doesn't have that many apps for it have been shot dead. At least when it's the Linux people saying it. Sure, Windows still has more apps, and more than one way to do it, but does it matter that there are 10 word processors for Windows when all anyone uses is Office?

    Throw in an increase in speed speed speed, better windows (and the rest of the world) connectivity, a rewritten (Snappy!) Finder, Quicktime, and who knows what else under the hood and you've got a great update. Sure, a lot of software will have to be tweaked to work with the update, but OSX is still maturing. APIs will stabilize soon and be solid, but Apple is adding functionality on top of all this.

  243. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by clf8 · · Score: 1

    Mostly free code??? Maybe the lowest level of underpinnings. Trust me, none of the gooey Aqua goodness is open source.

    Not that I should encourage this, but another one of Apple's niceties is that they don't have any draconian installation BS. No keys to enter, you don't even have to register the software. So, nothing is stopping you from buying a single copy and putting it on multiple machines. Except maybe your conscience...

  244. So...who is posting the Torrent to the Panther DP? by potuncle · · Score: 1

    You went to WWDC and got your copy of the Panther Developer Preview. Now run to your hotel room, make disk images, create a .torrent, post it on Slashdot and share it with the world. Come on....do it, do it, do it...

  245. Re:OT: I bet your "realtime" MPEG is nowhere near. by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

    For the record, it's possible to get "realtime" MPEG4 encoding that looks good.. but it still won't be artifact-free. That is what they are claiming here.

    Just like Jobs claim that AACs sound BETTER than CDs. Less noticeable artifacts maybe - hell, very likely. Artifact free? No way in hell.

    --
    There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
  246. 300 words or less... by Slur · · Score: 1

    Apple "forces" users to upgrade by innovating too damn fast. Every new computer or OS release is so much better that it makes the previous system look lame by comparison. Since Appel now uses an eminently debuggable processor architecture, a robust Unix-based core for the OS, and produces the best freakin' development system in the world their rate of innovation is increasing more and more. The new XCode system is so far ahead of Microsoft's Visual toolset that we Mac users are probably going to be "forced" to upgrade every few months now. Damn you Apple! Damn you to Hell!

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  247. Re:HA HA sense of humour at apple by MasonMcD · · Score: 1

    I also laughed when Steve said "[and the G5] has massive branch prediction logic.... which I don't know what it does - predicts branches. (laughter) I don't know... but it's a good thing (heavy laughter).

  248. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't use credit cards either,(I am anti usury) but I do use a debit card occasionaly. Might be an option for you. They work the same for online purchases, etc, the only thing they lack is the slightly better insurance from fraud angle that a true interest charging credit card has, so just don't use them for real major purchases and keep the account balance low. Besides that, they work OK when cash isn't an option. Or do snail mail with money orders, those work too, although slightly slower.

  249. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by MacGod · · Score: 2, Interesting
    That family license is an awesome idea. I wish I could buy PC software that way (what little proprietary stuff I use, anyway). One purchase covers the whole fam. With multi-computer households becoming incresingly common, how long until this becomes standard?

    Sadly, probably a while yet. Apple's family license basically works on the honour system. There are no serial numbers or anything like that. It's to keep honest people honest, just like the quasi-DRM on the Apple Music Store.

    Sadly, though, very few software companies are willing to put that faith in people.

    --
    "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
  250. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me get this straight-- you don't have a credit card because you don't want 3% of your $199 purchase price of the Jaguar family pack (which comes out to six bucks) to be taken away from Apple by the greedy banks.

    ("i'd rather give these percents to those people who provide something valuable to me")

    So instead you bought a $129 single pack and installed it on three machines, instead screwing Apple out of SEVENTY bucks.

    Buy hey, at least those greedy banks didn't get it, hmmm?

  251. will I eat out in Amsterdam? or SHOULD I SUE by fogpilot · · Score: 1

    I was really hyped about jaguar when it was released and got it immediately: shelled out 169 euro's (as compared to $129 for jaguar US) to buy it. Apple promised me a Sherlock that could find me a restaurant NEAR ME, directions to drive there. It promised it would tell me what movie is playing when and where. In fact, apple's dutch website is STILL promising these features. (www.apple.nl). Too bad Sherlock's yellow Pages have no dutch addresses listed... Too bad it's moviefinder only looks at US cinema's... Too bad Sherlock's television listings do not list any channel I can receive in Amsterdam... And too bad Apple charged me a lot more for Jaguar then it charges it's American customers, while delivering less functionality. And the baddest, baddest thing of all: Apple is still making false promises about Sherlock for Jaguar! Maybe I should drag Apple to court over this? Or is making false statements legal on the internet?

  252. XCode??!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Apple is preparing a new set of developer tools called XCode, which works with GCC 3.3, does distributed compiles (using available resources on the network), and has other cool stuff. It is fast, it has improved searching (like the Finder, and over entire projects), and it looks like an iApp (though it isn't metal). It removes the need to link; onnly link objects you need to launch. It starts compiling while you are editing, cutting the time you need to compile drastically. It can modify the program while it is running.


    Is this some kind of sick joke?
  253. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by nate1138 · · Score: 1

    What companies like microsoft don't understand is that everybody does this anyway. If your kid needs office for school, most of the time dad just loads the copy that came with his PC. They would make a lot of friends by making family-wide installs permissible. Oh well, I guess that customer touch is part of what makes Apple who they are.

    --
    Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
  254. Re:OT: I bet your "realtime" MPEG is nowhere near. by nutshell42 · · Score: 1

    No, mpeg is a complete framework, mpeg-4 specifies some codecs (ie what a decoder has to do to decode a compliant bitstream, you can decide how you want to encode it which is probably what you meant), a file format (a .mov look-a-like) and myriads of other stuff

    --
    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
  255. None is so blind as those who will not see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I've seen nothing to contradict such a claim."

    Yes you have, you just won't admit it.

    Lets just go with something here. Windows XP = Mac OS X. You may not like the comparison. Whatever. They are the same.

    Every Intel computer comes with a Microsoft Operating System. And systems that can use XP are eligible for upgrade pricing. Not in all cases, but probably for most, XP Home Upgrade is the appropriate operating system.

    But lets put that aside.

    Lets say when buying XP, you had to buy the full version. So that's $200. After being out for over a year, microsoft released a new version of XP, but they called it SP1. Now mind you, they release almost continual improvements, but SP1 was a significant upgrade.

    Do you know what SP1 costs? That's right. Nothing. Free.

    So lets do this comparison here:

    Initial Cost
    OS X: $130
    XP Home: $200

    Wow! Great! Apple is cheaper. But each year, apple introduces a "point" version of OS X, each adding $130 to the cost. Microsoft's SP1 is free.

    Cost after year 1:

    OS X: $260
    XP Home: $200

    Uh oh... something's wrong.

    So now predictably, you'll say "You can't compare the two! But you can. They're still the same.

    Year 3, OS X.3 is released.

    OS X: $390
    XP Home: $200

    Yikes!

    But eventually, XP will give way to YP (or whatever they call it. It will be an upgrade for $100. Meanwhile OS X.4 comes out for.... $130....

    Year 4:
    OS X: $520
    MS OS: $ $400

    Yikes.

    Looks to me like OS X is more expensive for OS costs.

    Maybe a better argument is "I really like my Mac".
    Buddy, I do too. I own 7 of them. But lets be real here. They're expensive to buy and keep up.

    1. Re:None is so blind as those who will not see by bellings · · Score: 1
      Your math is wrong. The "initial cost" of Mac OS X is free. It costs $0. Second, you're purposely misrepresenting Microsoft's release rate. If you are talking about "home versions" of their operating system, the release cycle has been:

      • 1995: Win95a
      • 1997: Win98b (this is not a typo, and b was not a downloadable upgrade)
      • 1998: Win98
      • 2000: WinME
      • 2002: WinXP


      There has never been even two years in a row, much less three, where you got all the updates from Microsoft "for free", despite your misleading claim to the contrary.

      If we assume a the "Home" verison of each operating system, purchased in the year 2000, the math goes something like this:

      Microsoft, home versions:
      • 2000: Windows ME, full version: $200
      • 2002: Windows XP Home, upgrade: $100
      • Total: $300


      Microsoft, full featured versions:
      • 2000: Windows 2000 Pro, full version: $400
      • 2002: Windows XP Pro, upgrade: $200
      • Total: $600


      Apple, home and business versions:
      • 2000: Mac OS X 10.1, full version: $0
      • 2001: Mac OS X 10.2, upgrade: $130
      • 2002: Mac OS X 10.3, upgrade: $130
      • Total: $260.


      I do not see any scenario where the Apple price is higher. Please point out where my math is wrong.
      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
  256. pedantic bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, knocked out the satellite reception.

    1. Re:pedantic bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh... like taking candy from a baby

  257. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by roskakori · · Score: 1
    So instead you bought a $129 single pack and installed it on three machines, instead screwing Apple out of SEVENTY bucks.

    well, as i see it they screwed themselves. they claimed the family pack should be available in shops, but it isn't. so i had to make a choice between supporting somebody i hate, or partially supporting somebody i like.

    considering that during the last 2 years i gave apple about 4500 euro, i really didn't feel bad about the latter.

  258. Re:OT: I bet your "realtime" MPEG is nowhere near. by Sleepy · · Score: 1

    >Just like Jobs claim that AACs sound BETTER than CDs. Less noticeable artifacts maybe - hell, very likely. Artifact free? No way in hell.

    Maybe he meant "AAC ripped from vynal records" :-)

  259. Here is the torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://bittorrent.kicks-ass.net:81/Panther_WWDC_De veloper_Preview.torrent

  260. Re:Ugh! Another $129 x 2 Machines! by drunkenbatman · · Score: 1

    I'll pay the extra, because I don't have to screw around with it to get stuff to work the way I want, like I did Linux and Windows.

    I don't want to pay extra, because there are big gaping holes in what works now. IE, I have no problem with paying for upgrades, I have problems when the 'upgrade' fixes a feature that never worked correctly. ...call me when I know I'll be able to print reliably in OSX again, or my powerbook & ibook aren't constantly kernel panic'ing after being awoken from sleep.

  261. Re:So...who is posting the Torrent to the Panther by potuncle · · Score: 1

    If no one else will, I guess I'll have to do it myself. Found it on Google Groups. http://www.torrentreactor.com/download.php?file=Pa nther_WWDC_Developer_Preview.torrent

  262. Re:Fast User Switching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fast User Switching also exists in Win2k

  263. Danger Will Robinson! by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Every Buffy fan knows what shiny really means!

  264. Panther works! by coolMikeUSC · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think that Panther might work fine on your graphite. I'm running the Panther dev preview on my 400mHz Indigo iMac with 1GB of RAM. It works beautifully, in some cases faster (at least that's how it feels) than Jaguar. I am sad, though, that the user transition Cube Effect doesn't happen...methinks it needs Quartz Extreme.

    --
    Ever notice how fast Windows runs? Neither do I - get Mac OS
    1. Re:Panther works! by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the insight. Though I'm guessing only having 256MB RAM (one of which may be the 'slow' kind) and a mostly full hard drive will effect my mileage, so to speak.

      Not to mention the power on/off problems, small (in today's terms) hard drive, lack of a CD burner, and near-daily hard disk errors. Overall it's been a good computer, but I'm ready for a G5.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
  265. Re:It's TRUE by Roguelazer · · Score: 1

    Why would one buy an Opetron for home use? Wait for Athlon64! opetron is for servers. Duh.