In most cases spammers get a domain and ISP service. Once spam is reported, the ISP/registrar can call to confirm the address and phone number. If the credit card is stolen, contact the credit card company -- which may avoid a chargeback charge.
Then if not stolen, cancel the account/domain and make the information available to the public.
Why don't you make a spammer's information public?
When a spammer has been found to be a spammer, you make avaiable, without a subpeona the information on the spammer so that people can file lawsuits against them.
Spamming can be profitable. Take the spammers to court and take away their money.
Actually, once running under Softice with virtualization turned on, I saw that the screen (DOS app) was being being repainted twice on every screen refresh.
It may eliminate the need for a reasonably fast machine to develop on, but you always need a target machine for testing! But, the test machine should be slow so that one can find performance bottlenecks and see the program operate under non-optimal conditions.
If the people are forced to test applications on slow machines, we may not have word processors that need 40MB of ram and a 933MHZ pentium III to run.
If I punch somebody in the face, that is a relatively minor crime, but if killed him with that punch, it is now murder. If I rob a bank with a gun, it is not the same as if I rob the bank with the gun and a person died of a heart attack in the robbery.
With the computer tresspass and fraud act, you have a minimal amount to trigger the act ($5000) and a large penalty. If you steal a car (worth $5000) you get a much smaller penalty.
I thought most of the filter lists has a category for porn, not child porn. This is may to force a new set of categories, for each state. There is a category for illegal activities, which could include child porn, but I don't think that the lists were built that way.
This may be unconstitutional as it may put too much of a burden on interstate commerce.
If the government had spooks working at google as spooks, do you think that they would have traces of ever being a government employee in their history? Unless, they would know that a spook would not have a government employment history in their backround, so they would put government employment that in their history. Unless,..... this gives me a headache, forget it.
Companies will take action and institute policies against downloading copywritten materials. This will be their defense against the company being liable for the downloading.
The RIAA/MPAA is doing this to aim at deep pockets that can order lots of people to do, or in this case not do, specific acts.
Since Windows 2000 is a circumvention device under the DMCA will they arrest Bill Gates for selling it? Or does the people who make that decision gets paid too much from Microsoft to do this?
The UCITA is an attempt of software companies to get out of responsibility. It is one thing to not be responsible for every minor unknown bug, but it is completely different disclaim everything and enforce many of these all to common draconian terms in shrink wrap license agreements.
They used to have you turn on the laptop computer so they can see something on the screeen. As is you could not remove the hard drive and replace it with a weapon.
Going into the JFK Federal building in Boston, one of the security guards told me that they had it because of the Oklahoma bombing. Yes, if they had Timothy take the truck through the metal detector, they would have caught him.
This is the same type of issue as people with degrees.
A person with a BSCS may be able to program a 2000 line program, but give them a problem to fix on a 200,000 program and they are dead.
All a degree or certification does is state that the person has taken course work and exams that show they they knew some knowledge at some point. It is not an end-all-be-all determination of skill. It is only one aspect to look at when determining a persons ability.
Actually that may happen. Not on a criminal level, but on a civil level.
A lawsuit against a company with many systems that are left unprotected and are being used as a relay or zombie for an attack may be comming soon to a court near you.
Doctors have been saying that people should take a break from the computer once or twice an hour. This is to ward off RSIs, not death -- is there much of a difference?
In some cases, I save source code in the file code by commenting it out. There are some cases where I remove features, but leave the code behind where I think it may be brought back in the future.
Slashdot Mirror
Then if not stolen, cancel the account/domain and make the information available to the public.
Why don't you make a spammer's information public?
When a spammer has been found to be a spammer, you make avaiable, without a subpeona the information on the spammer so that people can file lawsuits against them.
Spamming can be profitable. Take the spammers to court and take away their money.
I doubt that profiling would reveal that.
Of course all my code runs right the first time. I was thinking of everybody elses code.
Cutomers will not be running it, so don't bother.
If the people are forced to test applications on slow machines, we may not have word processors that need 40MB of ram and a 933MHZ pentium III to run.
With the computer tresspass and fraud act, you have a minimal amount to trigger the act ($5000) and a large penalty. If you steal a car (worth $5000) you get a much smaller penalty.
Didn't Bill Gates also say that OS/2 is the operating system of the future.
This may be unconstitutional as it may put too much of a burden on interstate commerce.
He is so full of it, his eyes are brown.
Lets see, drivespace toasting data is not a bug that people want fixed. Machine hanging, is not a bug people want fixed.
Yeah, right.
I thought the Dilbert is accurate.
If the government had spooks working at google as spooks, do you think that they would have traces of ever being a government employee in their history? Unless, they would know that a spook would not have a government employment history in their backround, so they would put government employment that in their history. Unless,..... this gives me a headache, forget it.
Companies will take action and institute policies against downloading copywritten materials. This will be their defense against the company being liable for the downloading.
The RIAA/MPAA is doing this to aim at deep pockets that can order lots of people to do, or in this case not do, specific acts.
Since Windows 2000 is a circumvention device under the DMCA will they arrest Bill Gates for selling it? Or does the people who make that decision gets paid too much from Microsoft to do this?
The UCITA is an attempt of software companies to get out of responsibility. It is one thing to not be responsible for every minor unknown bug, but it is completely different disclaim everything and enforce many of these all to common draconian terms in shrink wrap license agreements.
Going into the JFK Federal building in Boston, one of the security guards told me that they had it because of the Oklahoma bombing. Yes, if they had Timothy take the truck through the metal detector, they would have caught him.
What about changing the contract at the counter?
A person with a BSCS may be able to program a 2000 line program, but give them a problem to fix on a 200,000 program and they are dead.
All a degree or certification does is state that the person has taken course work and exams that show they they knew some knowledge at some point. It is not an end-all-be-all determination of skill. It is only one aspect to look at when determining a persons ability.
Some people blame the admins for not applying the patches, but should you?
Some things to consider about patches:
A lawsuit against a company with many systems that are left unprotected and are being used as a relay or zombie for an attack may be comming soon to a court near you.
Or you can write an OS that MUST be rebooted every month, or you can write it right. They still work, still compile.
Even though there is art in code, there is still metrics and obvious concrete methods on evaluating code that works.
When you are in pain during all your waking hours and being told that you would not be able to do anything with a keyboard again you may not think so.
In some cases, I save source code in the file code by commenting it out. There are some cases where I remove features, but leave the code behind where I think it may be brought back in the future.