Maybe they like online stuff because they can sit with their screen away from you and play games? Coolest thing you can do online is definitely show them a cool experiment which will usually mean fire or an explosion. It's even cooler to do that stuff in person. The first day of chem class my teacher always takes a dollar bill, soaks it in a water and alcohol solution, and lights in on fire. She would also do a demonstration where she soaked the inside of one of those water cooler containers with the same solution and drop a match in it. That's the kind of stuff that gets kids excited about science.
I had a similar thought. Wouldn't it be safer to publish the winning numbers (ones on the left) and have the little boards hidden? Then they can do whatever they want and it would be much much harder to predict winning cards, hell the winning numbers can be the same every time.
"Those who have aggressively pushed the issue of the dangerous Internet, such as Connecticut's attorney general Richard Blumenthal, are less than happy with the report."
if they really cared about kids then they would take the results happily just like any scientist would
ok ive heard stuff similar to these designs, i thinks toshiba is already making one meant for large office buildings (i.e. empire state building, sears tower, twin tower complex, when it was there) it may not be toshiba but it is a big japanese electronics company. and even better, i believe the company is based out of new mexico, and its making one thats like 10ft in diameter and has enough power for 20,000 homes for 7 years. and guess how much? 25 million, thats less than $250 per home per year. oh and i dont know if this is all of them but the new mexico on has no moving parts and is not capible of going super critical, and is housed in a think layer of concrete. this thing is supposed to come out this year, but the US board of nuclear review or whatever isnt ganna review the thing until next year.
Maybe they like online stuff because they can sit with their screen away from you and play games? Coolest thing you can do online is definitely show them a cool experiment which will usually mean fire or an explosion. It's even cooler to do that stuff in person. The first day of chem class my teacher always takes a dollar bill, soaks it in a water and alcohol solution, and lights in on fire. She would also do a demonstration where she soaked the inside of one of those water cooler containers with the same solution and drop a match in it. That's the kind of stuff that gets kids excited about science.
That would only accomplish getting wikileaks $0
Does anyone else find it ironic that the website selling stuff for an organization that loves anonymity for the people uses google analytics?
I believe there is already a method for texting status updates to facebook. Oh there it is
I had a similar thought. Wouldn't it be safer to publish the winning numbers (ones on the left) and have the little boards hidden? Then they can do whatever they want and it would be much much harder to predict winning cards, hell the winning numbers can be the same every time.
So how does it compare to nations the US decided were bad enough to invade?
Is your last name Pedantic by any chance?
Last I checked the meter was defined as the distance light travels in a vacuum in 3.3 nanoseconds.
"Those who have aggressively pushed the issue of the dangerous Internet, such as Connecticut's attorney general Richard Blumenthal, are less than happy with the report." if they really cared about kids then they would take the results happily just like any scientist would
ok ive heard stuff similar to these designs, i thinks toshiba is already making one meant for large office buildings (i.e. empire state building, sears tower, twin tower complex, when it was there) it may not be toshiba but it is a big japanese electronics company. and even better, i believe the company is based out of new mexico, and its making one thats like 10ft in diameter and has enough power for 20,000 homes for 7 years. and guess how much? 25 million, thats less than $250 per home per year. oh and i dont know if this is all of them but the new mexico on has no moving parts and is not capible of going super critical, and is housed in a think layer of concrete. this thing is supposed to come out this year, but the US board of nuclear review or whatever isnt ganna review the thing until next year.