Slashdot Mirror


User: kheldan

kheldan's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,904
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,904

  1. Re:I'd be wary. on MIT Uses Machine Learning Algorithm To Make TCP Twice As Fast · · Score: 1

    It doesn't make any difference where it came from if you don't understand how it works and just accept that it does.

    This is what's wrong with people these days! Do you question anything? Do you even try to understand how things work?

  2. Re:I'd be wary. on MIT Uses Machine Learning Algorithm To Make TCP Twice As Fast · · Score: 1

    ..where they admit they don't know why the system works..

    I know you're all being funny in this thread of comments, but I'm not amused at that remark at all, it's a little scary to be honest. If we do start living in a work where AI's are creating things that we don't understand, but use anyway, then everyone should be concerned.

  3. Re:Here's how you handle this bullshit if it comes on "Smart Plates" Could Betray California Drivers' Privacy · · Score: 1

    *sigh* FINE, just tell them (if this rediculous bullshit even comes up) that you don't want their shitty privacy-violating plates. Fuck the police, whatever, I fucking give up. I just hope I don't live long enough to have to deal with bullshit as rediculous as this.

  4. Re:Why is there an assumption of privacy? on "Smart Plates" Could Betray California Drivers' Privacy · · Score: 0

    It's an illusion held by the paranoid or genuinely guilty.

    Tell you what, asshole: How about you let me install video cameras and microphones, accessible by everyone on the internet, all over the inside of your house, including your bedroom and bathroom. Then we can all watch you have sex with your wife/girlfriend/self, watch you take a dump, and everything else you do, and you can face criticism for anything you do that upsets or offends some complete stranger (but that in a sane world where there IS privacy, would be no one's business but your own). You still OK with no privacy? THIS IS THE WORLD WE ARE ALL HEADED TOWARDS IF DIPSHITS LIKE YOU DON'T GET A CLUE AND HELP PUT A STOP TO IT, RIGHT NOW!

    Let me tell you one more thing: You know who else doesn't enjoy privacy? Here's the short list:

    1. Animals
    2. Small children
    3. PROPERTY
    4. SLAVES

    You sure you want to be on that list?

    Get correct, son. Before it's too late.

  5. Here's how you handle this bullshit if it comes up on "Smart Plates" Could Betray California Drivers' Privacy · · Score: 1
    1. Receive electronic, tracks-you-everwhere plates
    2. Break into several pieces
    3. Go to DMV, tell them "kids broke them trying to steal them off the car"
    4. Ask for regular plates
    5. If denied, repeat the process until they give up, give you normal, non-privacy-violating license plates
  6. Re:Scary Implications... on Scientists Seek Biomarkers For Violence · · Score: 1

    deny coverage based on genetic markers

    So they'd accelerate the creation of an entire underclass of people and their disenfranchisement? This shit has got to never see the light of day.

  7. Re:Scary Implications... on Scientists Seek Biomarkers For Violence · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up. This is the slippery slopes of slippery slopes. Anyone believing such technology wouldn't be abused to further agendas is sadly naive. Aside from shades of Minority Report and Brave New World, there would be heavy overtones of Gattaca as well; you wouldn't just have kids being pushed into various professions, you'd have kids denied access to education, social strata, and entire professional fields because of their "latent tendencies". This would create many more problems than it would ever solve, and it would create an entire underclass of disenfranchised-by-design people. People who (assuming accuracy of the test) have a natura tendency towards violence. People you're intentionally pissing off by treating as something less than human. What could possibly go wrong here, folks? Also factor in that they'd end up breeding with each other, because the "non-violent" people wouldn't want to associate with them. Now we also have a population of 2nd-class citizens who regularly increase their numbers, passing down resentment towards a government and society that keeps them down. Can you say "civil war"?

    I hope they find no way to physiologically predict who is potentially violent because NOTHING good will come of it.

  8. If this DOESN'T piss you off.. on What the Government Pays To Snoop On You · · Score: 1

    ..then there's no hope for you, none at all. You're paying for the "service", and then you're (potentially) also paying (via your taxes) to get snooped on by the goddamn NSA/CIA/FBI/whoever. How much more of this shit is everyone going to stand for?

  9. The price of mediocrity on Math and Science Popular With Students Until They Realize They're Hard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From TFA:

    "If more science graduates are desired, the findings suggest the importance of policies at younger ages that lead students to enter college better prepared (PDF) to study science."

    In other words, this is the price everyone is now paying for public schools sucking so much ass: A generation full of kids who will end up working at McDonalds or something equally meaningless, because they weren't given a decent foundation in grade school and high school.

  10. Re:Farts in their general direction. on Dropbox Wants To Replace Your Hard Disk · · Score: 1

    This. Times a million. "Cloud storage"? Absolutely NOT. EVER. Not even ONCE.

  11. Memo to Congresscritters: on House Democrats Propose National Park On the Moon · · Score: 1

    DEAR FUCKTARDS:

    It's real nice of you to do something like this, but I have a suggestion for something you should be doing instead: End the god-damned motherfucking sequestration, you ignorant baboons!!!

    Sincerely,
    TAXPAYERS WHO ARE GETTING SCREWED BECAUSE YOU SUCK SO MUCH ASS

  12. T2000 on 3-D Structures Built Out of Liquid Metal At Room Temperature · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our Robert Patick-esque liquid-metal killer-android 3D-printed overlords!

  13. Re:let me fix that for you on Lincoln's Surveillance State · · Score: 1

    Let me guess: you've given up voting in elections, haven't you?

  14. Re:The America I believed in never existed on Lincoln's Surveillance State · · Score: 1

    What if I think it's right and just to build the best society that's realistically possible?

    Because, like so many people down through the millennia, you're forgetting one immutable truth: The best way to ruin a good thing is to get a large group of PEOPLE involved in it. When you have ~300,000,000 people in a country, who gets to decide what is the "best society"? You? What gives you the right to decide that for anyone other than yourself? You want an idylic world? Magically get rid of 90% of the people in it currently, and I guarantee things will calm right down. Since near-genocide isn't an option, I suggest you stop dreaming vague, impossible dreams, and learn to work with and fix the system we have in place already, it's not entirely too late to do that.

  15. Re:The America I believed in never existed on Lincoln's Surveillance State · · Score: 1

    Narcism, hubris, decadence, greed, violence, corruption. That's what "The Left" has been pushing for.

    And the "right" just wants what's fair for everyone? Please, don't be quite so naive as all that. Remember the Puritans? They were some of the most hypocritical people in history. I'd rather have drug dealers and whores on every street corner than a world full of complete fakes.

  16. Re:Of course not on Ask Slashdot: Will the NSA Controversy Drive People To Use Privacy Software? · · Score: 1

    Why would the average person give a fuck about their privacy? Most people have nothing to hide, and unless they are a fanatic or a hobbyist, they could not care less who reads their stuff.

    The "average person" has NO IDEA what it is they're giving up when they shrug their shoulders and waive their right to privacy, and I wouldn't even care except that the attitude of the "average" citizen on this subject affects you and me, but you don't seem to see that, do you?

    Let me list for you people and things that do not enjoy a right to privacy:

    • Children
    • Animals
    • Prisoners
    • Slaves

    If it was you who was not caring about your privacy and whether or not you're being spied on by the government, how would it make you feel to be treated the same way as the entities on that list? Think about it.

  17. The America I believed in never existed on Lincoln's Surveillance State · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do I really need to say anything more?

  18. "The" is so last Thursday on Man Campaigns For Addition of 'Th' Key To Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd like to start a petition to include a "Teh" key on all standard keyboards, who's with me?

  19. Re:Does this mean a copy of Windows is free now? on Microsoft To Add Ads To Smart Search · · Score: 1

    Nobody should have to put up with that, either.

  20. Re:Does this mean a copy of Windows is free now? on Microsoft To Add Ads To Smart Search · · Score: 1

    Some of us still buy components and build our own to specs, not buy some name-brand box, so there is no OS pre-installed.

  21. Does this mean a copy of Windows is free now? on Microsoft To Add Ads To Smart Search · · Score: 2

    The hell with that crap. If they're going to shove ads right in your face like that, then they should give Windows away for free. If you're paying for the OS then there should NEVER be anything like this. Screw you, Microsoft.

  22. Re:Middlemen: the official plague of the modern ag on Tesla Faces Tough Regulatory Hurdle From State Dealership Laws · · Score: 1

    Tesla should have an advantage, at least right now, to promote the technology, which you have to admit is going to be the way of things. Facilitating adoption by the general public is only going to benefit everyone in the long run. Once it's really caught on there will be dealerships falling all over themselves to get in on the action, but for right now electric vehicles are a hard sell.

  23. Re:Idiots on Reject DRM and You Risk Walling Off Parts of the Web, Says W3C Chief · · Score: 2

    If enough people reject DRM, then content providers will stop using DRM, or risk losing so much revenue that DRM will become entirely besides the point.

    Content providers need to accept that some piracy is always going to go on, and the tighter they clench their fists, the more of the content is going to run through their fingers.

  24. Re:What could possibly go wrong? on Robotic Kiosk Stores Digital Copies of Physical Keys · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Does it ask for your home address and license plate number, store those too, to make it easier for the crook that hacks the machine, makes copies of your keys, and then robs your house and steals your car(s)?

  25. Re:..and this is ./-worthy news, how? on The Glorious Return of the Twinkie · · Score: 1

    Why is this modded down to -1, Troll when it's sparked such a conversation and has so many replies? Mod parent up, damnit.