Slashdot Mirror


User: Sunda666

Sunda666's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
253
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 253

  1. Re:guns dont kill people ... on Freenet 0.5.2 Released · · Score: 1

    aw dude, wtf is up with this anyway? does really anybody get a hard-on
    seeing a 7 yr old getting raped? totally un-sexy IMHO. but whatever.

    but, if they want to trade it trough the freenet, whatever. It is
    encrypted and no one can "open" the data in my node (at least I hope so)
    and find that it is kid porn or other illegal crap. It is what I downloaded
    and used that matters. I would not give up the ability to anonymously trade
    stuff to be sure that no one is "trading kid porn" trough my node.

    BTW, the "kid porn traders" can trade it by at least 100 different methods
    other than freenet, so, whats the point... And I don't give a rat's ass
    about this sick fuckers either.

    I think initiatives like freenet are the response of geeks to some nastyness
    from the USA (and other) governments, like the patriot act and crap like that.
    Human beings are complex beasts and hate being observed in their intimacy, and
    it goes for a lot of shit we download off the internet. So, there will be a
    spyware/encryption war until the government totally outlaws encryption and
    we are all fucked.

    Mind ya, I say this stuff but I'm not even affected by this things... In this
    country the piracy runs free and no one gives a shit, you can buy rips of
    movies and cds on the street for less than 2 USD. Same goes for software. Anti-piracy
    stuff is just starting here these days, but law enforcement and courts have a lot
    of more important stuff to deal with than kids using pirated windoze.

    cheers.

  2. Re:Why Windows on Online Voting In 2004 To Require Windows · · Score: 1

    Fortunately, it seems not to be the case (windows-only voting system). You can use windows,
    or you can use the old system (ballots, paper, etc, not sure, I don't live in USA, here we
    use electronic voting machinery, which sucks).

    cheers.

  3. Re:Required?? on Online Voting In 2004 To Require Windows · · Score: 1

    but Netscape does only support ActiveX (yuck!) on windows, so that's a show-stopper
    as far as portability goes.

    cheers.

  4. Re:they aren't worried about security on Online Voting In 2004 To Require Windows · · Score: 1

    But how complex has a voting site to be anyway? I think one can
    do it with the most primitive HTML, no need for fancy stuff.

    Even lynx users could vote, if they could get their way without
    candidate's pictures.

    cheers.

  5. Re:Devious plot? on Online Voting In 2004 To Require Windows · · Score: 1

    Sign me in!
    Paying US taxes should be pretty damn easy when compared to the ones
    we currently pay around here like 60% of our incomes are used to pay fscking
    taxes.

    Even if we had to pay both, the US taxes would likely be irrelevant.

    cheers.

  6. Re:I'm not claiming we shouldn't fund NASA, but... on SETI Gains Respect, NASA Funding · · Score: 2, Informative

    sorry to nitpick on you, but I dont think any of USA's military budget is used to
    build AK47's... these are made in sweatshops all over the third world (and china).
    There are some knock-offs made in the balcans, too.

    I do agree about the missiles, tough. Expensive shit, and they keep building thousands
    of them.

    cheers

  7. Re:Uhh on Screensaver Bug in Mac OS X · · Score: 1

    man you are so wrong (and so right at the same time)...

    right, because \winnt\system32 is ofcourse a system directory and should
    be acessible only by admins.

    wrong because winnt4 defaults to FAT for its root drive, and even if you
    choose NTFS, you end up with "everyone full controll(all)(all)" for the
    entire drive. So much for the average MS sysadmin out there.

    hope they fixed it for the newer versions, never tried anything beyond
    nt4, it was enough shit for me to switch to linux & bsd.

    cheers.

  8. Re:Hardneded Gentoo on Zynot Foundation Forks Gentoo · · Score: 1

    Well, partly true...

    See, once our friendly 3133t h4x0r has r00ted our box, and are currently finding his way to
    break the SELinux layer, it is pretty easy to spot him and kick his butt out of the server,
    change the root password, patch the hole that let him in, etc.

    With standard linux, once he roots, you are basicaly fscked, since he will install his root-kit
    immediately and hide his activity from you. Tough luck.

    I wish I had this think on my router... It got r00ted by some fuck from the netherlands. I was
    able to find it out in about 2 hours, since it acted a bit weird (shitty rootkit, probably), but
    god knows what he did in this meantime... So I had it reinstalled (no big deal, just NAT box), this
    time with better security (mandrake's "paranoid security").

    See, the 2-identical-layer-security thing has saved my ass, since the dude had to stop at the router
    for a while to scan my network and prepare attacks on the inner boxes. Thank god I figured it out in
    time, if he fscked some ineer machine it would be hell.

    It was pure luck, since obviously it was a shitty rootkit (ie, it fscked "ps" but not "pstree" or "top", for
    example). But, having 2-level security in the same machine makes pretty easy to quickly detect
    intruders and deal with them.

    cheers.

  9. Re:SCO is criticizing Linus for What??!! on SCO Berates Linus' Approach To Kernel Contributions · · Score: 1

    let them try, I live in Brazil, land of no law.

    good luck for them.

    cheers

  10. Re:SCO is criticizing Linus for What??!! on SCO Berates Linus' Approach To Kernel Contributions · · Score: 1

    heh they should call it GGPL or G2PL then, for chrissake! ;-)
    I admit my ignorance on that matter tough. Never cared much about
    licenses and stuff.

    cheers.

  11. Re:SCO is criticizing Linus for What??!! on SCO Berates Linus' Approach To Kernel Contributions · · Score: 1

    I think RMS created the GPL (doesn't the G stants for 'GNU'), Linus just distributed Linux under it.

    cheers.

  12. Re:People suck on Profile of a Hard-Core Gamer · · Score: 1

    I bet cats think the same about us...

    Humans are truly a pathetic animal.

    cheers.

  13. Re:who's to say? on Profile of a Hard-Core Gamer · · Score: 1

    good god, dude, this capalert.com link is the funniest thing EVER!

    "# igniting anal wind then being incinerated"

    LMAO!

    think im gonna read more ratings on this site to find good movies to watch (i.e., ones with sex, drugs and pointless violence)

    cheers.

  14. Re:"Standards" and tradition mindset? on Ask ReiserFS Project Leader Hans Reiser · · Score: 1

    Heh, true enough... but GNU is Not Unix and we don't see anything like this in the GNU realm either. This sucks, because it would be a pretty nice feature for some directories like the ones where you put your documents or quake 3 config files...

    cheers.

  15. Re:Versioning on Ask ReiserFS Project Leader Hans Reiser · · Score: 1

    the ancient VMS filesystem from the 80s (or is it 70s?) has a pretty smart and simple way to accomplish this: file versioning. Works like this: every time you save a file, instead of overwriting the old one, a new one is created, and the others are renamed like this: foo.txt;1 foo.txt;2 foo.txt;3... The number of versions the filesystem keeps is configurable per directory/file. Very good for a bunch of seventies programmers, eh? I wonder why no fscking UNIX filesystem that I know of offers something like this.

    cheers.

  16. Re:So what? on Ripping from Vinyl, Simplified · · Score: 1

    not THAT complex... acording to Nyquist,

    2 x maximum fequency reproducible without distortion == sample rate.

    thats why you always lowpass before digitizing, if not the harmonics
    would bite your ass.

    cheers.

  17. Re:Do they have... on OS X Hacks · · Score: 1

    well this is partly true. if I want to use the built-in trackpad of ibooks and powerbooks i'm stuck with only 1 button, and it sucks.
    if i can plug in my M$ trackball optical everything works wonders, tough. but is kinda hard on small places or airplanes, for example.
    OTOH, my compcrap intel laptop has a nice synaptics trackpad, with scroll buttons and shit that is awesome.

    cheers

  18. Re:Next trip on the airplane... on MP3 Player In An AK-47 Magazine · · Score: 1

    ah dude, 30-06s are cool and stuff, but nothing beats the good old .300 WinMag for me.
    Big .300 is a damn cannon, gotta love it, if never tried.

    Btw, WinXP? heh no thanks.

    cheers.

  19. Re:Next trip on the airplane... on MP3 Player In An AK-47 Magazine · · Score: 2, Informative

    > to get a response of "that kicks ass" from the local police...

    heh except that the AK-47 sucks ass as a rifle. shitty, shitty rifle.

    AK47s are to assault rifles what the original VW beetle is to cars. Reliable,
    simple, but simply sucks.

    Well i should not talk on this subject since i'm onto bolt-action snipers
    anyway... assault rifles are a waste of ammo ;-)

    cheers

  20. Re:Microsoft not the only one on How Would You Move Mount Fuji? · · Score: 1

    I must agree with you about nautilus... I am a GNOME user but absolutely hate it.

    Fortunately, after upgrading my GNOME I do mv /usr/bin/nautlus /usr/bin/nautilus.sucks and
    get rid of it.

    cheers

  21. Re:Microsoft not the only one on How Would You Move Mount Fuji? · · Score: 1

    er, I DO need network transparency and use it every day, albeit not in the way
    it was designed to work, but trough the ssh X hack. But it is still the good old
    X network transparency that has been in X for ages (first time I used it was in
    1992 in some sparcs).

    cheers

  22. Re:This doesn't automatically mean higher performa on Translucent Windows for X using OpenGL · · Score: 1

    > It can be quite useful to have windows which become translucent when dragging or resizing. It gives a nice halfway ground between
    > showing outlines and showing contents. This is the setup I use on my Win2k box; it'd be nice to be able to have the same in Linux.

    geez dude, (E)nlightenment already did that back in 1999 (0.14.4 i think)
    You "are able to have the same in Linux" for a long time.

    cheers.

  23. Re:You have heard of VirtualPC, right? on Legacy-Free PCs · · Score: 1

    yeah i know that, but i was not planning to run osX on the powerbook, but YDL.
    OSX is a pain in the arse, besides being eye-candy.

    cheers.

  24. Re:The legacy part that bothers me... on Legacy-Free PCs · · Score: 1

    does SMP work with the noacpi option? never tried that, no need so far, but I never
    tried athlon-smp, only intels (p3 and p4), and had 0 problems with SMP and APIC so
    far...

    cheers

  25. Re:The legacy part that bothers me... on Legacy-Free PCs · · Score: 1

    yeah, but none of them will let me run win2k inside vmware, thats why I bought
    a crappy compaq laptop instead of a powerbook. fscking micro$oft...

    cheers.