No, it's "much more live than Google Earth" which shows images that might be recorded years ago, and "less live than the LIVE, you see on TV" which shows images that might show images that are just recorded a few seconds ago.
Which patents would cover mono but not java? Are you saying that java is a patent disaster waiting to happen and the only reason sun is releasing it now is to distance itself from java?
Will they use the GPL for all the components? That is the compiler, the class libraries and the runtime? Then it will still be easier licensewise to use mono.
And HTML is valid SGML, so what's your point? SGML can also be parsed by automated systems. That much of the content out there contains errors, have little to do with whether it is encoded in xml og sgml.
Are there any arguments in favor of RFID as opposed to chip-cards? I mean, conventional chip-cards that need physical contact with the reader would be safer in that the can not be wirelessly read and could contain processors to do crypto-calculations on card (since they have better power supply). The extra time it perhaps would take to read the card shouldn't be a bottleneck since airport checks are plenty slow as they are.
Exactly. Further everybody have the runtime on their desktop and access the distribution medium (flaky tape drives need not apply). Sure you can do some advanced stuff in a browser, but you can also do some really simple stuff and that's the point.
Just like the space of possible e-mail addresses is to large to iterate over, and it therefore is infeasible to create an exploid that propagates via e-mail?
I would like to ask a follow-up question: Do the replacement of tables with div-elements really help anybody (besides giving job security to web developers)?
Note that I am not at all against css. But I just find the table-tag very usefull for layout. If you need to do a three-column layout it will be much easier and give cleaner code to just use a table, than to use one of the many css "hacks" needed to give the wanted result in most browsers. If you want the layout to do something "extra" (eg. "make the center column 400px wide, but allow it to grow if the cell contains a wide image, pushing the right column") it will (probably) be impossible using divs, but trivial using tables.
One reason to not use tables, that is usally given, is that tables should only be used to tabular data and not for layout, as to not create problems for blind users. But just an empty alt-attribte on an image signals to the user-agent that the image is for layout only, a empty summary -attribute on a table could for example be used to signal that the table is for layout only. My guess is that, that convension would be much easier for user agent implementors to use that to parse through all of the css hacks. I also feel that it would be semanticly much cleaner to have a table with one row and three cells than to have three or four divs nested and floated in strange ways.
Read "The Mythical Man-Month" by Fred Brooks. It's short, you can read it in a day/couple of days.
And no, we do not think that MBAs are evil. They are just illinformed about what programmers do, and still like to take the dissisions that programmers should take. As you've just demonstrated. (No, asking slashdot, giving so little information that it is a joke, is not "letting the programmers deside")
They are all linux, which means that they are all the same. Just like both c++, java and scheme are Turing complete and therefor the same, and an IBM compatible computer and an Apple both can do computations and therefor is exactly the same. Next Question, please.
I think, that if you use something like wbxml you will keep some of the stucture in the file (aka. your parser will be simpler/faster). http://www.devx.com/xmlzone/articles/bs120101/Part 1/bs120101p1-1.asp
(Well I newer tried it, so mayby I should just shut up.)
Isn't this why you run (the app) postgresql as (the user) 'postmaster' and (the app) apache as (the user) 'www'? So you can control the access a app has to your system.
(Windows do this too: the webserver run as 'iusr_machinename')
Slashdot Mirror
No, it's "much more live than Google Earth" which shows images that might be recorded years ago, and "less live than the LIVE, you see on TV" which shows images that might show images that are just recorded a few seconds ago.
> Perhaps some Microsoft patents?
You didn't answer the question as to why those patents wouldn't cover java.
Which patents would cover mono but not java? Are you saying that java is a patent disaster waiting to happen and the only reason sun is releasing it now is to distance itself from java?
Will they use the GPL for all the components? That is the compiler, the class libraries and the runtime? Then it will still be easier licensewise to use mono.
> XHTML is valid XML
And HTML is valid SGML, so what's your point? SGML can also be parsed by automated systems. That much of the content out there contains errors, have little to do with whether it is encoded in xml og sgml.
Well, then only load the part of the document being edited to the client.
Are there any arguments in favor of RFID as opposed to chip-cards? I mean, conventional chip-cards that need physical contact with the reader would be safer in that the can not be wirelessly read and could contain processors to do crypto-calculations on card (since they have better power supply). The extra time it perhaps would take to read the card shouldn't be a bottleneck since airport checks are plenty slow as they are.
Exactly. Further everybody have the runtime on their desktop and access the distribution medium (flaky tape drives need not apply). Sure you can do some advanced stuff in a browser, but you can also do some really simple stuff and that's the point.
Just like the space of possible e-mail addresses is to large to iterate over, and it therefore is infeasible to create an exploid that propagates via e-mail?
I would like to ask a follow-up question: Do the replacement of tables with div-elements really help anybody (besides giving job security to web developers)?
Note that I am not at all against css. But I just find the table-tag very usefull for layout. If you need to do a three-column layout it will be much easier and give cleaner code to just use a table, than to use one of the many css "hacks" needed to give the wanted result in most browsers. If you want the layout to do something "extra" (eg. "make the center column 400px wide, but allow it to grow if the cell contains a wide image, pushing the right column") it will (probably) be impossible using divs, but trivial using tables.
One reason to not use tables, that is usally given, is that tables should only be used to tabular data and not for layout, as to not create problems for blind users. But just an empty alt-attribte on an image signals to the user-agent that the image is for layout only, a empty summary -attribute on a table could for example be used to signal that the table is for layout only. My guess is that, that convension would be much easier for user agent implementors to use that to parse through all of the css hacks. I also feel that it would be semanticly much cleaner to have a table with one row and three cells than to have three or four divs nested and floated in strange ways.
Have you ever tried?
My guess is that the ps3 will have come out, including a linux devkit, before the xbox360 is broken so much that it is usefull.
Well, the things you yourself create would be the IP of you, so, no, you wouldn't live in an IP-free environment.
No, John was saying that they were deliberately disguising song and dance as political "debate".
Read "The Mythical Man-Month" by Fred Brooks. It's short, you can read it in a day/couple of days.
And no, we do not think that MBAs are evil. They are just illinformed about what programmers do, and still like to take the dissisions that programmers should take. As you've just demonstrated. (No, asking slashdot, giving so little information that it is a joke, is not "letting the programmers deside")
They are all linux, which means that they are all the same. Just like both c++, java and scheme are Turing complete and therefor the same, and an IBM compatible computer and an Apple both can do computations and therefor is exactly the same. Next Question, please.
If you can't check, you shouldn't trust. By trying to bypass some of the checks, you bypass your own security and the security of those who trust you.
I think, that if you use something like wbxml you will keep some of the stucture in the file (aka. your parser will be simpler/faster). http://www.devx.com/xmlzone/articles/bs120101/Part 1/bs120101p1-1.asp
(Well I newer tried it, so mayby I should just shut up.)
Damn! Now "Get rich quick"-schemes are turning up in slashdot-stories.
12 sys-admins around a dimly light table:
- "Here is yet another one: 'My friends, are you running into brick walls with your job?'"
- "Shall me vote right away?"
- "Guilty"
- "Guilty"
- "Guilty"
- "Guilty"
...
- "I'll the arrangements"
Isn't this why you run (the app) postgresql as (the user) 'postmaster' and (the app) apache as (the user) 'www'? So you can control the access a app has to your system.
(Windows do this too: the webserver run as 'iusr_machinename')