"BatMax Corporation will assume no liability for any inaccuracy found in the web site, documentations, packaging, photos, images, graphs, manuals, advertising, promotional material, publications..."
IANAL, so answer me this: Can a company really make any claims they want to and protect themselves with a statement like this?
Why would I want two separate screens, with twice the electronics, rather than a single, large, hi-res display? It's just a big screen split up the middle! The stated advantages all involve viewing multiple windows at once... why can't I do that with one big screen? And the advantage of one screen is that it offers the possibility of viewing a large image in a landscape orientation (something the two-screen setup doesn't).
The only advantage with the two-head design is that you can flip around one of the two screens to give a presentation... but how useful is that for most people?
I use a Dell 2000fp at work (21.1", native 1600 x 1200 resolution). It's an amazing display and can be had for as little as $1270 (see here for details). Even without the special offers, the list price is $1,599 -- half the price of the NEC.
From the Terms and Conditions:
"BatMax Corporation will assume no liability for any inaccuracy found in the web site, documentations, packaging, photos, images, graphs, manuals, advertising, promotional material, publications..."
IANAL, so answer me this: Can a company really make any claims they want to and protect themselves with a statement like this?
Why would I want two separate screens, with twice the electronics, rather than a single, large, hi-res display? It's just a big screen split up the middle! The stated advantages all involve viewing multiple windows at once... why can't I do that with one big screen? And the advantage of one screen is that it offers the possibility of viewing a large image in a landscape orientation (something the two-screen setup doesn't).
The only advantage with the two-head design is that you can flip around one of the two screens to give a presentation... but how useful is that for most people?
Just my 2 cents...
I use a Dell 2000fp at work (21.1", native 1600 x 1200 resolution). It's an amazing display and can be had for as little as $1270 (see here for details). Even without the special offers, the list price is $1,599 -- half the price of the NEC.
FYI...
The old site (running BSD) is still up at: http://198.63.57.204/
The new site, running win2k/IIS is at: http://130.94.214.143