Listen. You can pretend to be a hotshot "lead" programmer all you want, but please don't use the name of Steve Woston.
The real Steve Woston's site is here, and he states exactly what he thinks of you and your posts. I challenge you to reply to this post and tell me what you think of the fact that you've been exposed by the real Steve Woston, "Steve".
This is not the real Steve Woston. Please, take note of this fact, do not moderate me down, or the Steve Woston troll will tarnish the name of a good man, Steve Woston.
Steve's real page is here, where he states what he thinks about the whole issue.
The above troll is impersonating Steve Woston and he's very embarrassed about it.
Moderators, time to start moderating down the Zoyd troll. I don't know about most Slashdot readers, but I just can't believe that someone could still hold anti-feminist views that resemble the attitude of society in the 1800s in 2000.
Not to mention that you seem to have an explosive temper and immediately cut into anything that you don't like without really examining the situation. Take this post apart and rant evilly about each line, perhaps it'll make you look more intelligent.
Any justification for this? The real Steve Woston is certainly not a troll. And no, I'm not the Steve Woston troll. I say the Steve Woston troll, because the real Steve Woston is not a troll. He is quite frankly embarrassed and annoyed at being impersonated by the Steve Woston troll. You can read his thoughts on the matter here
I am assured that this mr. Valloppillil pretender is but a troll, but what the heck, it's always better to have a chat by the bridge than to go out and burn in sunlight.
Assured by whom? I never once said that my first name is Vinod, or that I'm related to this person. I'm not. My name is actually mark, second name Cedric, but a lot of people just call me Cedric for short:-) The spellings of our surname are even different. I don't see how I'm pretending at all, please clarify.
Why would/should they? On the other hand, isn't it? No, it's not. It's a bloated mess that's sort of like VMS, but with mandatory graphics (graphics on a server??? WHY ???) If they had have extended MS-DOS to be multiuser and multithreaded, and then extended the Win 3.x system to match it, instead of making the whole system dependent on graphics and the incredibly cryptic, bloated, and poorly documented Win32 API, maybe people wouldn't hate them so much. I don't hate them, of course, I'm just suggesting what they could have done.
I don't hate you either, even though calling me a troll is kind of offensive. There are real trolls on Slashdot, but I'm nto one of them. The Steve Woston troll is a real troll. The real Steve Woston is genuinely upset at being impersonated by this troll. The Real Steve Woston's site is here, you can read about what he thinks of the whole issue yourself. The guy is basically pissed off at being impersonated on Slashdot, and even though I agree fully with free speech and anonymity, it's a pity that things like this can potentially happen as a trade-off. Steve W0ston, Wost0n, or whatever you call yourself, please stop blackening the name of Steve Woston and generally making Slashdot unpleasant for the good readers of Slashdot.
As for my post being "non parsable", I'm sorry that you don't udnerstand what I'm saying. Sure, some of my terminology might not be 100%, but the moderaters who originally moderated me understood that while my terminology might not be 100%, I was making a valid point, and they read between the inconsistencies to the truth beneath. Good job, moderators, thank you for not being small minded and understanding what I was trying to say. As for you, korpiq, read the post more carefully before blasting me as Vallopillal pretending (???) troll.
Eep, sorry about the length of time it took to reply. Didn't realize you responded until today:) Well, I'm from South Africa. The Connells had airplay on radio stations here in the early and mid 90s, in fact one of their songs, 74-75, is still playing. That's how I heard of them. They never toured here or anything.
Is that the molecular polarity of any given molecule is directly proportional to the force exerted on that molecule by the forces of the systematic enviroment of that particular instance of the system object in question, if, that instance of course, has anything to do directly with that molecule isn't relevant to the object itself, or in fact, the molecule's relationship directly, with that instance of the object's force. To put it simply, there's no way to find equivalence between the instantial force and the molecule's property grid.
As a citizen of a developing country, I can assure you that there are quite a few people here using the internet. Sure, not as many as in the US etc, but well over 1 and a half million. Unless you can provide an affidavit stating that EVERY single person in the US and Canada is rich and doesn't need the kind of services you're talking about for developing countries, like the one I'm in....well, I dunno. Maybe it's just time for some people to step off their proverbial high-horses slightly. The one and a half million refers to dial-up users and ISDN dial-up users, btw, and there are also a shitload of companies with permanent connections to the internet. Sure, DSL isn't quite there yet (telecomms monopoly), but once the monopoly is broken up, we should see DSL prices coming to acceptable levels and not restricted the way they are at the moment. AFAIK this is schedueled for 2001.
Technologically, the only thing I'm concerned about here is education. There's no denying it, it's pretty useless here at schools. Kids are still using P75's and 486DX4/100s running MS DOS 6.22 and TurboPascal. THIS is a worrying factor. Universities aren't much better in their choice of language - BLECH - JAVA. (They do have better hardware though). Anyways, that's about all for now.
Impersonating Steve is exactly what this troll is doing. The comments make no sense, as usual, and generally seem to be an attempt at blackening the name of Steve Woston. The Real Steve Woston's site is here.
One great example is Goldbach's Conjecture: All even numbers greater than 2 are the sum of two prime numbers.
I'm no math wiz. But The Real Steve Woston is. I'll take a shot at the prime numbers/even number sum problem, though.
Now, we've got 4, right? that's the next even number after 2. So, 3=prime, 1=prime, and 3+1 = 4. So, it looks like the theory is actually true.
:):):)
Ok, on a more serious note, The Real Steve Woston is severely upset at being impersonated and trolled on Slashdot. I encourage you to vist his site and see what the man himself has to say about it. To the Steve Woston Troll: Please stop impersonating Steve Woston on Slashdot.
I can't believe that this troll has damaged Steve's reputation so badly. That is certainly not the real Steve Woston, and there is no "J J J J J ulius" Game company. The real Steve Woston's web site is here
A kind request to the troll who's impersonating Steve: Please stop doing this, and ruining Slashdot for the thousands of Slashdot readers who enjoy the intelligent debates sparked by the Slashdot news items.
This is a great site, but we should be wary of Trolls taking over.
What languages would be suitable for a Doctor of Technology? I know that in the Bachelor of Technology degree, the main language seems to be Java. (Don't ask me why, though).
Most people would say that whatever a Doctor of Technology uses would be pretty good.
The real Steve Woston's site is here, and he states exactly what he thinks of you and your posts. I challenge you to reply to this post and tell me what you think of the fact that you've been exposed by the real Steve Woston, "Steve".
Steve's real page is here, where he states what he thinks about the whole issue.
The above troll is impersonating Steve Woston and he's very embarrassed about it.Stop trolling! The Steve Woston is terribly annoyed at being impersonated by trolls on /. Read what the Real Steve Woston has to say about it here.
Talking of trolls, Zoyd....
Moderators, time to start moderating down the Zoyd troll. I don't know about most Slashdot readers, but I just can't believe that someone could still hold anti-feminist views that resemble the attitude of society in the 1800s in 2000.Not to mention that you seem to have an explosive temper and immediately cut into anything that you don't like without really examining the situation. Take this post apart and rant evilly about each line, perhaps it'll make you look more intelligent.
Who's the troll here, Zoyd?
Any justification for this? The real Steve Woston is certainly not a troll. And no, I'm not the Steve Woston troll. I say the Steve Woston troll, because the real Steve Woston is not a troll. He is quite frankly embarrassed and annoyed at being impersonated by the Steve Woston troll. You can read his thoughts on the matter here
Did you actually read the post you just replied to, before replying to it, Anon ?
I am assured that this mr. Valloppillil pretender is but a troll, but what the heck, it's always better to have a chat by the bridge than to go out and burn in sunlight.
Assured by whom? I never once said that my first name is Vinod, or that I'm related to this person. I'm not. My name is actually mark, second name Cedric, but a lot of people just call me Cedric for shortWhy would/should they? On the other hand, isn't it? No, it's not. It's a bloated mess that's sort of like VMS, but with mandatory graphics (graphics on a server??? WHY ???) If they had have extended MS-DOS to be multiuser and multithreaded, and then extended the Win 3.x system to match it, instead of making the whole system dependent on graphics and the incredibly cryptic, bloated, and poorly documented Win32 API, maybe people wouldn't hate them so much. I don't hate them, of course, I'm just suggesting what they could have done.
I don't hate you either, even though calling me a troll is kind of offensive. There are real trolls on Slashdot, but I'm nto one of them. The Steve Woston troll is a real troll. The real Steve Woston is genuinely upset at being impersonated by this troll. The Real Steve Woston's site is here, you can read about what he thinks of the whole issue yourself. The guy is basically pissed off at being impersonated on Slashdot, and even though I agree fully with free speech and anonymity, it's a pity that things like this can potentially happen as a trade-off. Steve W0ston, Wost0n, or whatever you call yourself, please stop blackening the name of Steve Woston and generally making Slashdot unpleasant for the good readers of Slashdot.
As for my post being "non parsable", I'm sorry that you don't udnerstand what I'm saying. Sure, some of my terminology might not be 100%, but the moderaters who originally moderated me understood that while my terminology might not be 100%, I was making a valid point, and they read between the inconsistencies to the truth beneath. Good job, moderators, thank you for not being small minded and understanding what I was trying to say. As for you, korpiq, read the post more carefully before blasting me as Vallopillal pretending (???) troll.
Eep, sorry about the length of time it took to reply. Didn't realize you responded until today :) Well, I'm from South Africa. The Connells had airplay on radio stations here in the early and mid 90s, in fact one of their songs, 74-75, is still playing. That's how I heard of them. They never toured here or anything.
I second that. Perhaps it's time for a MPG/QT/ASF player for the Java platform.
Could you please give me more specifics as to what you can't make sense of ?
Is that the molecular polarity of any given molecule is directly proportional to the force exerted on that molecule by the forces of the systematic enviroment of that particular instance of the system object in question, if, that instance of course, has anything to do directly with that molecule isn't relevant to the object itself, or in fact, the molecule's relationship directly, with that instance of the object's force. To put it simply, there's no way to find equivalence between the instantial force and the molecule's property grid.
I bet the Real Steve Woston could do it.
As a citizen of a developing country, I can assure you that there are quite a few people here using the internet. Sure, not as many as in the US etc, but well over 1 and a half million. Unless you can provide an affidavit stating that EVERY single person in the US and Canada is rich and doesn't need the kind of services you're talking about for developing countries, like the one I'm in....well, I dunno. Maybe it's just time for some people to step off their proverbial high-horses slightly. The one and a half million refers to dial-up users and ISDN dial-up users, btw, and there are also a shitload of companies with permanent connections to the internet. Sure, DSL isn't quite there yet (telecomms monopoly), but once the monopoly is broken up, we should see DSL prices coming to acceptable levels and not restricted the way they are at the moment. AFAIK this is schedueled for 2001.
Technologically, the only thing I'm concerned about here is education. There's no denying it, it's pretty useless here at schools. Kids are still using P75's and 486DX4/100s running MS DOS 6.22 and TurboPascal. THIS is a worrying factor. Universities aren't much better in their choice of language - BLECH - JAVA. (They do have better hardware though). Anyways, that's about all for now.Larry Wall is a genius eh ? I mean, the whole Perl thing...
The real Steve Woston's site is here
The real Steve Woston's site is here.
Steve is genuinely upset that he's being impersonated on Slashdot.
It's known that a troll has been impersonating Steve Woston on Slashdot. This is NOT THE REAL Steve Woston!!!
Thanks all, please visit Steve's site and see what he has to say about the issue.
One great example is Goldbach's Conjecture: All even numbers greater than 2 are the sum of two prime numbers.
I'm no math wiz. But The Real Steve Woston is. I'll take a shot at the prime numbers/even number sum problem, though.Now, we've got 4, right? that's the next even number after 2. So, 3=prime, 1=prime, and 3+1 = 4. So, it looks like the theory is actually true.
Ok, on a more serious note, The Real Steve Woston is severely upset at being impersonated and trolled on Slashdot. I encourage you to vist his site and see what the man himself has to say about it. To the Steve Woston Troll: Please stop impersonating Steve Woston on Slashdot.
Sorry, I don't usually reply to my own posts, but there was a URL mistake This is Steve Woston's home site. The REAL Steve Woston.
This is the real Steve Woston's home site.
Cheers, CV.
Good readers of Slashdot, this is The real Steven Woston's website.
I'll let the site speak for itself.
A kind request to the troll who's impersonating Steve: Please stop doing this, and ruining Slashdot for the thousands of Slashdot readers who enjoy the intelligent debates sparked by the Slashdot news items.
This is a great site, but we should be wary of Trolls taking over.
Cheers, CV.
Most people would say that whatever a Doctor of Technology uses would be pretty good.