The Few, The Proud, The Geeks
Ethan Zuckerman, one of the founders of Tripod, felt that he wasn't getting as much as he wanted out of what he was doing. He knew from personal experience that a lot of people had achieved personal gain through the Internet, and wanted to donate money or time to a good cause, but couldn't find one that fit. So, along with now-program director Elisa Korentayer, Ethan decided to form Geekcorps, as a way to take burnt-out techies to developing countries, bringing their expertise to places that desperately needed it. Ethan assembled a team of technical gurus -- and international development specialists -- and started gathering funds to make his dream come true. His strategizing and monetary legwork is about to bear fruit: Geekcorps pilot program is beginning this year in Ghana. The Ghana program demonstrates the Geekcorps approach in a nutshell: the group will dispatch techies from the United States and Europe to developing countries to work with local small and medium for-profit enterprises. They're targeting countries with enough infrastructure to use the Internet for commerce, but where that opportunity goes largely unused.
The six techies to serve in Ghana will work with six businesses that work with information technology, whether they turn out to be cyber cafes or small manufacturers that want to get online. In return for providing these services, Geekcorps will ask each business to commit to social responsibility and community engagement. Geekcorps would ask, for instance, that a cafe offer access services for low and/or free rates to members of the local community. The specialists chosen for the program, likewise, are expected not only to help out these start-ups, but also to provide information technology training for the local community.
Zuckerman recognizes that Geekcorps isn't the only organization to do this kind of work; also in the works is a global database of techies who would be interested in volunteering for their program, so techie volunteers can be farmed out at no cost to other governmental and community-building projects. While there is only so much that Geekcorps can do, they understand that by keeping information free and taking the time to do it right, the benefits will be much greater.
Linux and other Free Software products have been extremely popular in developing countries, for their adaptability and low hardware requirements as much as for the absence of per-seat licenses. Is Geekcorps dedicated to using Free Software solutions? I asked Elisa Korentayer, one of the Geekcorps founders and international specialists.
Elisa: We're pretty dedicated. We're a big fan of Open Source, and we're a big fan of taking advantage of free software. The aspects of the Internet that are incredibly conducive to non-profit, saving-the-world kind of attitudes, we're really into that. Think about it -- What we're doing in human terms is very similar to what Open Sourcing is. We're going into a country and we're saying 'We're going to offer you services, but we're going to ask you to give those services to other people.' We're going to say 'You can have access to this, but you need to provide that access to other people who didn't have access before."
Elisa provides a startling example of the scale of the technology divide developing countries face:
Elisa: One of the sad-but-true facts right now is that the United States government has set a goal to have a computer in every school, in every library, and they're about 90% of the way there. The goal that the United States has for developing countries is for everyone to live within one day's travel of a telephone.
Geekcorps is looking for volunteers to build these solutions in developing countries. However, if you can't get three to four months off of work to volunteer in Ghana, there is still a good opportunity to work with Geekcorps in your off-time back in your local neighborhood.
Elisa: A lot of the other stuff we're thinking about in terms of taking advantage of the Internet is that we hope to have an open channel for our volunteers in Ghana to communicate back to volunteers at home, so other techies can log in from wherever they are to help those in the developing countries."
Companies worldwide claim to make the Internet and computers more accessible, but Geekcorps is getting out there and doing it this summer. Geekcorps needs time, effort and rampant volunteerism, and the opportunity for Open Source and Free Software enthusiasts to get involved is there for the taking.
Out of interest - how many /. readers would/will consider signing on to a scheme like this? Personally, at 19, a M$oftie and no exp. I'm probably not qualified.
I'm not sure whether this is brilliant or stupid.
Pros: Technology clearly helps people become more self-sufficient. It's not necessarily a good thing to wait until everything else is in place to give people tools.
Cons: Perhaps the money and resources would be better spent helping people stabilize their economies, get fed, and things like that?
I guess I come down on the "pro" side. We've been trying to "feed the poor" for as long as we've had written history, and it's never really *solved* anything. Now, if we *EDUCATE* the poor, maybe that'll actually change something.
My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
Iridium can also help in this respect, I just realize. It can actually reach some of the remote areas!
---
Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com." The purpose of that site was not known. -- MSNBC 10-26-1999 on MS crack
--
# Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
$Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
Wouldnt it be better to start giving these countries some food before the internet? There gonna spend all day surfing the web racking up there ISP bill. =P
Don't people think that preventing starvation in 3rd world countries would be more important than bringing the internet the 2nd world countries?!?
I for one will not support the Geekcorps.
Don't get me wrong, I think It is a good idea and there hearts are in the right place, but there are other things that are more important.
-----
If my facts are wrong then tell me. I don't mind.
what happens all too often is that businesses (and individuals)want to donate their old hardware stored in the back closet (XT, AT, etc) made by companies that at no longer around, and/or are no longer supported. Considerable expertise is required to work with these, and many folks are deficient when dealing with command lind interfaces. Often, the expertise resides with a few people who still remember how these things work
of course, knowledgable folks all want the latest toys.
I can still run my business from a dos database program I know (it's relational), but I don't. (I have moved on to better things)
I know I would be considerably under-happy about providing tech support for people ramping up on this. Especially from overseas.
(I have worked in tech support, and the worse cases are the people who want you to help design their system from scratch over the phone, for free. and of course who do not want to learn since you are their intelligent talking book. It is, of course far easier in a course room situation, where you can grow the appropriate attitudes of personal responsibility)
So the issues are:
How are these being managed?
The repair issues alone could be horrific. Something works well for six months or a year, then dies a horrible death, and you need to redo the setup with new obsolete hardware. This could be a death trap for the tech supporting the setup.
"It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
What do you think these people are? Some kind of hive mind?
Did you not conside that they will all have their own individual preferences, just as geeks in developed nations do?
I've been toying with a similar idea for some time: dedicate some of my time/skills to try to make a little difference no matter how small, although I also thought that the third world it is not in dire need of the techie skills I've got to offer. Doctors & farmacists for medical help, teachers for education & literacy, engineers for better infrastructures (water, electricity, etc). That is what they probably really need most. I'm not sure if they really need us to set up a network or a cybercafe for them although it is probably worth a try. I just wonder how many people go do this kind of thing not just to help others but to feel better with themselves. The society we have built generates lots of burn-outs fed up with this crap where the supreme value is money and no-one gives a shit about anything else. Feeling depressed today? get out there and buy something you'll feel better for a little while. There is a whole bunch of people that is so attached to OBJECTS that they are nothing without them. Many of us geeks are a bit like this.
The charitable portion of the project would be pouring in the free training, but the success could be measured by these projects becoming self-sustaining. I guess I'm thinking of a higher tech version of what the Grameen Bank has been doing in Bangladesh, where they put together a group of locals who each accept individual loans, but agree to "cover" each other and share the risk of default. These people (women, I think) embark in small industry, using the loans (very small) to buy a sewing machine or something, but the model has proven quite effective in allowing families to achieve real financial independence (no, we're not talking about early retirement here :)
So, I like the idea of a realistic but forward looking project: grounded in creating self-sustaining commercial enterprises, but one which is also teaching more high tech and the other aspects of a modern service economy than the Grameen program strives for.
Remember the old adage (paraphrased as best I can remember), "Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime." I'm all for geekcorps... I'll be checking into their web site further to see how I can help.
First of all, I think the idea of educating people is a good thing. Don't get me wrong!
But, according to Johan Galtung's Rank Disequilibrium theory of war, educating the poor, if done by itself, can encourage violent revolutions.
The theory goes like this: when people are wealthy, educated, respected, and their skills are being well used, they are not likely to revolt. Likewise, if they are poor, uneducated, abused, and ignored they are likely to be resigned to their lot, and be not likely to revolt. However, people who are a mix, eg poor but educated and unable to get a worthwhile job, are unhappy and are therefore more likely to revolt.
This theory suggests that to cause a civil war, one should:
Galtung does not suggest by this that 3rd world countries should be kept in their "underdog" position, but that development should be done on several fronts simultaneously.
First off all, I'd like to say that I come from Trinidad in the Caribbean, which is a developing third-world nation, albeit more on the "developed" side of developing. And this kind of program is exactly what the developing world needs.
The third world needs to catch up with the developed world. This can not be achieved by following in the footsteps of the developed nations: as fast as we develop, the developed nations will maintain their lead and we will always be second-class world citizens.
Information technology has the ability to allow us to leapfrog several steps in the development process by creating economies based on the 21st-century business model from the ground up rather than recreating offline economies and going through the same painful and expensive restructuring process that the developed nations are currently undergoing. And, yes, it would be a good idea to get all our citizens clothed and fed, but to do that we need money and lots of it, and the only way to get that is to get our economies competing effectively with the rest of the world.
But the age-old need-money-to-get-money problem comes into effect: we are too busy preventing complete collapse of our economies to think about beefing them up. We don't have the resources, both physical but especially mental -- third-world countries suffer heavily from "brain-drain" as all our best and brightest get their bloody H1-B visas and ship off to the states as fast as they can.
The developed nations have made all their money exploiting the developing nations for raw materials, cheap labour and relaxed laws of every kind for centuries now: it's high time they started giving back.
Given the chance to learn, and love learning, people in '2nd world' countries will embrace knowledge, and strive to advance their society (or at least their families..).
Give people access to the internet (and in turn, the world around them), and they shall learn. Education is the key.
"Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, feed him for a lifetime..."
Aut disce aut discede.
I build up net surfing stations using linux running on old hardware and then donate them to people who can't afford a new computer. I also occasionally teach free computer classes for people who need to improve their job skills but can't afford commercial training.
Thad
The Bolachek Journals
In the upcoming global market that the Internet
presents, we are slowly erasing the divides that
are present right now. If you could train a
village in Africa on how to successfully compete
in the new market, they will be prepared to earn their own money for food. No one wants a hand out, but no one minds someone helping them to help themselves. A minor investment in training and equipment will pay for itself tenfold unlike consumables, enable them to purchase consumables on their own.....
Starfleet comes down on my ass about the "Prime Directive"...
DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
The Peace Corps is doing the same thing. This is great news for people like me, who were told all they were qualified to do is teach mathematics. The url to a local article follows, maybe someone can find one with a national scope? Peace Corps director launches technology program
It comes back to that old adage...
Give a person some fish, and feed them for a day.
But, teach a person to fish and feed them forever."
The real question is: Is technology Fish?
meaning is technology the one thing that we should be teaching second, and third world countries(I personally hate the terms 2nd and 3rd, it makes them seem different than us even though they aren't!). Is technology really the holy grail? Will it feed the hungry?, will it cloth the clothless?, will it fill help the less fortunate countries stand with their more technologicaly advanced brethren?
I think the answer is yes. I firmly belive that technology can help other countries find a place in this new world that we are creating. If they aren't given the tools to help themselves now they are in danger of being left behind in this "race" for technological evolution.
Hey posters. If you are relly reading these replys then I have another favor to ask of you: Please make this a real topic. Turn this reply into an "ASK SLASHDOT". With the Question something like: IS technology really the holy grail that will solve all the world's problems?
Well it doesnt have to be that question but somthing like it. You all have better experience writing questions that people resond to. Be my guest.
Thanks for your time.
flatrabbit,
peripheral visionary
"Never wrestle with a pig, you both get dirty and the pig likes it."
I think that it is always a nice thing when humans try to help other humans, but I am not entirely sure what geekcorps wants to achieve. It seems that they want to help local businesses and help them get onto the inet.
Funny that is, who would be able to buy anything from them when noone has inet access(now we are talking about really far away future earnings<g>). Internetcafes are nice, but will, unless properly adminstered be used for gaming, which will also not help the economy.
Even when considering latest economic research, evidence is inconclusive and not entirely on the side of more information equals better living standards. From geekcorps webpage you can't exactly figure out, what they are up to.
Having read some of the development economics papers, it seems that there have been positive relations between enabling them to access to the following kind of sites(incomplete, but you get the notion):
news(which many don't have in their villages and towns)
crop and farming information(what kind of seeds, best strategies against shocks, how to build up credit systems on a village basis,..)
social, political and job education(there are actually a few NGOs I think, that are trying this right now)
What did not seem to be useful is to let them get lost in cyberspace browsing around for hours at amazon&co:)
The Internet by itself will IMHO not help developing countries a great lot, until they can enhance their productivity(which is actually possible), educate people(which is also possible) and let them communicate with the outside world(which most of them have and will never see/experience, being bound to their countries/villages for all their life), which will hopefully open their minds and initiate/support democratic thinking and values of the people in those countries.
The problem it seems has very often been to get Internet access to the villages, service the computers, governments(the inet challenges some of their views, take for instance China) and who is going to pay for all this.
Just to throw something into the discussion here, some people believe, that after having been left out of the Industrial Revolution, that the Third World, might be able to join the Information(Internet) Revolution and simply skip the step to fully developed industrial countries.
This is an interesting point and I think that it might be possible for some countries or better regions, but that this won't be a general solution. Looking at India, which has a few software development hotspots, taking the country as a whole, the Inet has not changed very much, besides inducing dreaming about becoming an inet millionaire, for some of the cs students. Most of the ppl still live in poverty and neither has the inet changed the trend of the population, namely upwards(by 2030 they are supposed to overtake China, according to the UNpop)
Before bla-ing anymore along, I would like to know, what exactly it is that geekcorps will be doing and whether they are planning to help ppl use the inet or get local business into the net(if the later is the case, I doubt they have thought enough about all this).
Considering the latest developments in countries like Zimbabwe(was down there just 3 months ago<g>) I would make sure that there are not some nice coup d'etats&co cooking...would give the name Internet Revolution a totally new meaning(you would be very fast revolutionizing your geek ass again out of that country)
-k13
beautiful women hate sigs
Actually, the peacecorps is looking for techies as well! But I think they are concentrating on things like wiring schools, training kids, etc. I know, 'cause they made the Big Push for me to join when I was graduating from college a couple of years ago.
These two plans could work together really well and tandum... I mean, what good is a tech startup without a stream of qualified workers, and what good is giving kids tech knowledge if they're all going to have to leasve the country to find work?
Without the internet, how would they know what these things are in the first place?
Hi. Ethan from Geekcorps here. Yes, Peace Corps is starting a couple of programs for technical volunteers - we were down meeting with the Director of the Peace Corps earlier this week and he's pretty enthusiastic about what the Peace Corps can do to bridge the International Digital Divide. But we agreed that Peace Corps and Geekcorps are focusing on different aspects of bridging the digital divide. Specifically, Peace Corps is sending volunteers who can spend a lot of time with communities teaching basic tech skills (word processing, basic web usage, email.) We're sending volunteers for a much shorter period of time (three months instead of two years), but our volunteers are specialists with deep skills in an technical area. Thus, the projects we're going to undertake are more like helping a business set up an ecommerce presence or a wireless WAN than teaching basic email skills. We're really excited about working with the Peace Corps - one thing we talked about with the Peace Corps recently was the idea that we could serve as a resource for Peace Corps when we're working in the same country.
First there is the question of what use the Internet would to people in second world countries. A few people have commented that it would be enable people to learn and gain knowledge, but there is more to it than that.
With the Internet as we currently see it, one of the major uses which we in the developed world have is purchasing things on-line. These purchases are invariably cheaper than they are to buy in a shop, so we save money. In Britain the government has already commented that they want to get more of the deprived areas onto the Internet. They recognise that those people who most need to save money, are loosing out on the chance to do so. Those who can afford an Internet connection can save a lot, thus increasing the economic divide within the country. This divide is obviously even bigger between the developed and developing countries for in part the same reasons.
Secondly. Those people who have questioned the merits of a scheme like this, on the grounds that there are more important things which developing countries need seem to have missed the point. Yes, they do need food, water and shelter. Of course we shouldn't stop giving that and start giving them PC's. But there is a limit to the amount of food and cloths which can be donated at any time, and once this limit has been reached, we should not sit back and say we are doing all that we can, we should strive forward to find more ways in which we can help, which IMHO is exactly what this scheme is setting out to achieve.
To me it makes no sense at all to get a highly skilled computing professional, lugging sacks, building walls etc, when he/she has rare skills which can be put to use instead.
The point is, you can make a huge difference just be working a few weekends, essentially in your own back yard. To see an example of what can be done, check out a site that we have been working on in Baltimore:
http://agape.qis.net/
This site is hosted over the same 56KB modem line that the kids used to surf the web, so be prepared for a wait, ok?
-p.
It can be an interview if you want it to be. Keep throwing out questions and I'll answer them as fast as I can. Can't promise I'll answer everything today (gotta mow the lawn at some point), but I'll get you responses faster than Lars did to the Napster questions... :-)
>Do people in developing countries prefer Gnome, KDE, or Afterstep? Vi, emacs, pico?
In Ghana, the developing nation where I've spent the most time, most people aren't aware that they could be running Linux on their PCs. Part of the work we're hoping to do is introduce folks to the opportunities free *nix presents for folks who want to run a highly scaleable tech presences. So, give us a few months and we'll get you some data back from the pilot. :-)
Me, personally? Gnome and Emacs.
I see a lot of debate about whether we should feed the hungry or educate the people in technology.
I think the people advocating feeding the hungry first are overlooking vital information.
When looking to feed the hungry, you should first ask, Why are they hungry? How about this list?
Answer: Yes there is.
Answer: Yes there is.
Answer: Yes.
Answer: Political corruption.
Answer: Yes and No, in some cases, yes if the knowledge how to produce were available, in some cases no, where the local production is blocked by the current polical/military environment.
I could go on, but I think you get the point. The question then is, Is there a place for the tech help? I would say, absolutely, and the more technology spreads, and the more information is dispersed because of this, the more people will have the knowledge and thus power to prevent people from being starved by corrupt polical systems. Will starvation be eliminated? No, because corruption cannot be eliminated, it can only be reduced.
Anyway, that's my 2 cents on the subject... :-)
I think this is a great idea. The argument I see being used against this the most is that a lot of third world countries have more important problems to worry about (like food, shelter, ect) than worrying about technological issues. I agree, but remember Geekcorps isn't going to any old third world nation, but targeting those who would benefit the most and already have a sort of established foundation to work from. Second, I agree that many places have more important problems at hand, but also look at it like this: There are other organizations out there to provide for those needs. Geekcorps is going what geeks do best, so to speak. Combine Geekcorps efforts with the efforts of other "helping hand" organizations and I think together we can make serious progress in developing nations.
Just a thought
What about some of the unix pros here(did I say some? ooh my god) helping you guys by designing a unix distribution that is optimized to run on extremely low spec computers?(maybe something like this already exists and I don't know about it??) Or do you already have something in mind yourself? If something like this already exists, please drop me a link, I have been looking for something like that. -k13
beautiful women hate sigs
I seem to be in a rather small minority on /., but I am not a computer type at all. I'm an engineer with some geek tendencies, but I can't program my way out of a wet paper bag.
I have been thinking a lot about initiatives like this lately. Having developed a fairly deep toolkit of skills (water treatment, energy optimization) and a huge karmic deficit (I work in the oil industry), I am looking for a way to apply my skills in a more socially beneficial way.
What really has been my impediment to pursuing a second or third world opportunity is a fairly strong disagreement with the over-riding faith in technology that seems to underly many of these initiatives. To me, it reeks of cultural imperialism that what was good for our society (in my case N. American) will be the way out of hunger and suffering for those around the world.
To be honest, I am skeptical that the modern technological life seen in much of N. America is anything to be envied. As we become further immersed in mediated experiences, we lose our need for community. And community is one thing I have seen in pre-industrial (for lack of a better term) nations in spades.
Maybe initiatives such as Geekcorps address this need for community for the relative few who become involved. And hopefully those who do will bring back a different outlook on what they can do for their own society.
Finally, if anyone knows of any similar initiatives for those of us who deal in atoms rather than bits, let me know.
Laugh while you can, monkey boy!
As a geek living in inner-city Boston, I know for a fact that there are schools here that don't have functioning libraries, forget computers and network access. My high school taught BASIC and Pascal on vintage Apple IIes as recently as 1996.
Why not put together a domestic Geek Corps? Call it "Amerigeeks" something like that. Why go overseas when you can bridge the "digital divide" in your own backyard?
Put my clarinet beneath your bed 'till I get back in town.
If you don't have property rights, you're just a serf.
"Don't people think that preventing starvation in 3rd world countries would be more important than bringing the internet the 2nd world countries?!?"
A million times no. I see this argument dragged up on /. every single time an article has anything to do with developing countries, and it is quite simply saying that it is better to give people fish than to teach them how to catch fish, which will never get anyone anywhere.
Yes, there are people starving *right now*. And yes, sending them food will help prevent them from starving *right now*. But then five, ten, fifteen, twenty years from now they will *still* be starving, and then their children will be too.
There is only one way to solve the problem and that is to focus on long-term solutions for empowerment: that means precisely two things: education, and technology.
I'm sorry if that proposal does not give you the immediate gratification/satisfaction that somebody somewhere will not starve *today*, but you will just have to learn how to think long-term, rather think about those people's kids, grandkids etc.
By just sending food you achieve nothing other than to perpetuate the problem.
"How can a person like me really help the underdeveloped nations of the world?"
I live in a developing country (South Africa) and have been wondering myself what I can do to help give our local "previously disadvanted" people some sort of leg-up into technology (long-term solutions are absolutely the only way to go, i.e. educating people.)
Basically I was thinking about devoting a few hours per week to teaching programming, since that is my field of expertise, and as skills go, its going to be a basic requirement for some time still for any country that wants to prosper.
Not sure where I could go though or how to go about it.
It would be nice if they could set up some sort of index of "how to contact a Geekcorps near you" type of thing. (Mebbe there is one, haven't clicked the link yet ..)
The problem is that although I've got 6+ years in the industry, have worked my way up to Tech. Svcs. Manager for an internet provider, I have no cash to live on or for plane fare for this sort of volunteering. Wages are not as high for the tech sector here in Canada (Vancouver) as they are elsewhere, like the US. If there was a program like this which would pay plane fare, and give a small living allowance, I would be much more likely to go. The living allowance would not have to be much more than to keep myself fed, clothed, and not completely insane, but three months without something would be pretty difficult.
TheGeek
TheGeek
http://www.geekrights.org
Kill the monkey
I think that the businesses are going to have problems holding up their end of the bargin. I mean, its nice to be able to trust everyone, but
there is no way to see if the business supports the local community. It's a hell of a lot easier to recieve then to give.
Since I left college a year ago, I've been telling people that my ultimate plan in life is to become a world-traveling techie.
Originally, the idea was that I would find a job with a company that had an overseas office, and at some point transfer there, and work there for a year. During the course of that year, I would save up enough money to move to another country, and try and find a job there before I left.
I realized of course that first, I needed to clear myself of my existing debts (which is currently progressing well), and second, I would probably be limited to developed countries.
I didn't give much regard to 1) language barriers and 2) racial strife. For the former, I figure that English is a well-established language internationally, enough to get by on, and that for where it doesn't, I'll either motivate myself to learn it, or get by on touristese. For the latter, I don't know; but I don't think it would keep me out of many countries.
From my POV, it's too bad GeekCorps is volunteer. I couldn't take that time off (3-4 mos.) from work; it would have to be between jobs. And I think I'd be seriously bored to go back to America with its unexciting two-party politics
and its disaffected society of boob-tubers.
(And to my peril, I'm more attracted to iron-curtained political hotspots than well-traveled classical locales. Heck, I can see all I want of London by watching PBS. But Bagdad, that's a real place to discover. Violent overthrows and bombings on the street corner? The occasional repressive military junta? Like I said, American politics is boring me. Having something interesting happening around me is a welcome change to living where I've been lately.)
Call me a cloud-headed adventurist (and I already know I have a death wish, thanks), but honestly, I chose a the technical field because I wanted to be able to do something I enjoyed. In the same sense, I want to find an exciting way to do it.
If GeekCorps lasts, I just might decide to save up some living money and jet off to one of their missions sometime next year. Assuming I haven't already found the ideal path to my quest.
--
Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
Geekcorp's approach is admirable because it will help increase worldwide participation in cyberspace. I think the Internet has previously-unimaginable potential for social reform, but it will not be realized with such disproportionate access. Check out the UN's 1999 Human Development Report. This link will show you a pie chart that illustrates the divide (plus alot of good docs)
GLOBALIZATION WITH A HUMAN FACE
The Internet can decentralize power, which could be such a boost to humanity. I think the dream will remain unrealized if the power will only spread amongst the top %20 of the world.
But, as with any method of intervention, there is the potential of harm. I personally agree with those who would dissolve/drastically reform the IMF and World Bank. These institutions generate tremendous wealth for financiers and externalize the substantial risk to industrialized tax payers. They loan to the foreign elite, but extract the payoff from the developing poor.
It is not hard to imagine a program like this one creating a stronger dependency on the West, which is probably not in their best interest.
For the most part, I think Geekcorps embodies some great ideals (blending open source with philantropy and a species-centric view), but I'd like to see some more discussion re: How to make sure we are truly helping. I think we'll find it's a more difficult question than we think.
Without criticizing Geekcorp's intent or integrity, I want to point out organisations who have been doing this and more to assist not-for-profit NGOs and humanitarian groups for years. Most people know the story - this technology represents to many groups in developing or strife-torn countries the cheapest (and sometimes the safest) way of communicating to the outside world.
The APC has been assisting communication, networking and training in developing countries for well over 10 years.
Especially in Africa, people such as Karen Banks (amongst many others) from GreenNet have been working with African groups with internetworking (or UUCP/Fidonet when the comms infra has not been available or appropriate) for many years.
Also, ISOC (Internet Society) have a sustainable education/training project open to all in developing countries.
There is little sign on the Geekcorps' site that they are aware of these and many other efforts (except for AOL), but I would hope that communication with these groups would further their goals through coordination of efforts (or at least of being aware of what others have been doing for many years before them).
shine brightly
Time flies like an arrow -- Fruit flies like a banana
Take a look at
Small Linux: http://smalllinux.netpedia.net
Vector Linux: http://metalab.unc.edu/vectorlinux/
Green Frog Linux: http://members.linuxstart.com/~aus tin/GreenFrog/
muLinux: http://sunsite.auc.dk/mulinux/
ThinLinux: http://www.ThinLinux.org/
But there's at least one additional project to provide a Linux distro to the 3rd world. If I could only recall the name right now... (oldering sucks)
Is there a way to provide some help from home? Maybe customize OSS for free? For startups that cannot afford payed programmers? Or provide online knowhow in certain fields?
thanks a lot.
beautiful women hate sigs
I would recomend having a read of Mick Dodson's analysis (from this past weekend's Corroboree 2000 presentation) at:
www.austlii.edu.au/au/orgs/car/media/C2K%20updates .htm#Mdodson
Other speakers' words are there as well, apparently in reverse-order of presentation (so that the Governor General's words come first...? if so, monarchy still rules here... which would explain both unresponsiveness in government -and- some of the censorship that we've been talking about down under... but I digress...).
Anyone interested in helping to mount such a SlashDot-clone (preferably in, but - why not? - maybe even outside Australia) can send e-mail to:
reconcile@ara.cx
Actually I asked them about this at a street fair last year in San Francisco where they had a booth. The guy got all righteous and harrumph-ish at me and said no, their needs and programs were far more basic and critical than that and that the people they helped had a long way to go before they could start to worry about Internet connections. I was rather surprised and disappointed at his attitude and decided to look elsewhere for this kind of program...
Time flies like an arrow -- Fruit flies like a banana
Forgot one important distro.
Tiny Linux:
http://tiny.seul.org/en/
This means that we can't accept a ton of volunteers at once, since we've got to provide a substantial amount of money for each volunteer to go overseas... but we hope that funding won't prevent anyone from joining Geekcorps.
I'm sort of cynical about bringing/forcing the internet on a totally unaware population. The internet is not some panacea. It won't feed people or make them content. A Kalihari bushman doesn't need a goddamn laptop. In fact the internet is a homogenizing force now that business has discovered it. Think what it could do to other cultures. Remember the Prime Directive ;)
I think we are so caught up in our wonderful palm-pilot-toting, cell-phone-ringing, pager-vibrating, glazed-over-CRT-staring, technological world, that we arrogantly assume that everybody wants or needs it or that it can help everybody in some way. The internet brings all sorts of problems that developing countries don't need to have to deal with. First of all they need to stop being exploited by first-world countries. They need to be self-sufficient, in whatever their interpretation of that means (in many cases that doesn't mean exploiting natural resources for export so you can import that latest first-world Pokemon products). They need to be self-determining...not supported by stupid puppet regimes that the West patronizingly thinks will be the best for them.
There's a whole hell of a lot of more real problems that these countries face than the mythical problem of not having "enough" technology. If you're so concerned, join the Peace Corps, donate money (to an unconditional charity preferrably). Don't insist you know what's best and go in and institute your own changes. Help people help themselves. They need helping hands, not expensive crutches.
It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
If you ask your volunteers to find sponsors (like for AIDS walk or the like), then a lot of those costs could be avoided. This is commonplace for overseas ministry. Something this noble should be real easy to fund. I have 5 friends going to Ghana this summer, and they raised $20k in two and a half months. Be creative!