No, a child molester is someone who molests children. Someone who draws cartoons and pictures is an artist. There is no such thing as "legitimate art" you're buying into their mentality.
Art is art. What would make it legitimate verses illigitimate anyway?
I have children.
I believe that people drawing pictures of children IS NOT the same thing as people touching children.
Touch my children and risk death. Draw cartoons all you want.
Personally, I'd rather the perverts wank to hand-drawn cartoons than to images of REAL children.
No one gets harmed by cartoons - published or otherwise.
Slashdot Mirror
No, a child molester is someone who molests children. Someone who draws cartoons and pictures is an artist. There is no such thing as "legitimate art" you're buying into their mentality. Art is art. What would make it legitimate verses illigitimate anyway?
I have children. I believe that people drawing pictures of children IS NOT the same thing as people touching children. Touch my children and risk death. Draw cartoons all you want. Personally, I'd rather the perverts wank to hand-drawn cartoons than to images of REAL children. No one gets harmed by cartoons - published or otherwise.
Sadly, I saw no mention of getting laid...