It should read "Google Sues US Gov't For Considering Only Microsoft".
It's a slippery slope, people. The next thing you know, people will be using the word "alternate" when they mean "alternative".
"some insist that money 'will have no meaning in a future dominated by advanced molecular manufacturing or other engines of mega-abundance."
Uh huh, sure. And we'll all have flying cars, and we won't need to work because we will have created new ways produce food. And there'll be no wars, and free ice-cream.
The point is that it's passive. If you drop an active circuit in a bathtub, it'll probably fry all the circuitry. A passive circuit is less likely to be damaged, so it would still work next time you ran it past an RFID reader.
ie. they're saying the RFID chip will be hard(er?) to disable and therefore for a thief to disguise his stolen netbook.
Slashdot Mirror
It should read "Google Sues US Gov't For Considering Only Microsoft". It's a slippery slope, people. The next thing you know, people will be using the word "alternate" when they mean "alternative".
A google search led me to their website, which suggests otherwise. http://www.walk.com.au/pedestriancouncil/page.asp?PageID=105
"some insist that money 'will have no meaning in a future dominated by advanced molecular manufacturing or other engines of mega-abundance."
Uh huh, sure. And we'll all have flying cars, and we won't need to work because we will have created new ways produce food. And there'll be no wars, and free ice-cream.
The point is that it's passive. If you drop an active circuit in a bathtub, it'll probably fry all the circuitry. A passive circuit is less likely to be damaged, so it would still work next time you ran it past an RFID reader. ie. they're saying the RFID chip will be hard(er?) to disable and therefore for a thief to disguise his stolen netbook.
by an Aussie reporter
I don't think I like your tone. You got something to say about Aussie's?
Stop talking like a farmer.