what if the chineese goverment mandates that google hands over certian sensative search and user information statistics of foriegn citizens contained on chineese based servers???
sucks to be us right???
Its easy to this, mabey it is bullheaded of me to think that every human on this planet has the right to live under a democracy??
really, well a magazine devoted to Macs seems to think so. Really its not biased, not at all.
This is as much relevent news as the posting a link to how much Jerry Fallwell hates gays, goths, the intarweb, aethists, etc.... We all know it, we don't care/wanna hear it.
We all know mac users think they are smarter than everyone else, so we really don't need it re-hashed.
you will hear a bunch of soliders trampling through the woods. You will KNOW they are there. But thermal imaging in connection to rifles is not as common as you might think. There is a major acuracy loss.
I am talk about standard GIs here. Getting a bunch of soliders to be absolutely quite moving through the woods at night is another thing.
Special forces, cav scouts, and the like is its own cat and mouse game. From what I understand of it they're methods of camo are much better than a suit of what looks like whats behind you.
What might come out of this that will help the grunts is if you can but tiny little cameras and led photocells in a cream form, and smear it on your face like camo paint, puting on an expert camoflage that would take hours with conventional methods in minuetes, and could change with your surroundings, and nodes that could communicate by sending small electric pulses through your body(see old slash dot artical, look it up)
Lets face it, bradleys suck, and they are just as big and bulky, not to mention slower and noiser than the M1 series.
The new stryker family of vehicles seems to be designed for urban warfare. There is a lot of debate within the tanker world if they are indeed solid vehicles. Time will tell I guess.
see in america, we got something called FILTERS, on our intakes. Its kinda complicated, and probably classified, so I won't bother trying to explain. but the M1 series rolls through sand just fine.
also, I am intrested into seeing how an infernal combustion engine works, as aposed to an internal combustion engine. If its as cool as it sounds, I think I got a new idea of what to try in shoe-horn into a nova.
the top armor of the m1 is very light for some reason, by the sides are decently armored.
If the tank is moving, they ain't exactly easy to hit in a weak spot, if you got a good driver
The major threat in iraq right now the army is concentrating on is road side bombs, and other such rellish, usually dentonated on by cell phone, or other such remote devices when a convoy gets close.
There's something to the term unauthorized demonstration that just echoes suppression.
yeah, too bad its out of the mouth of a conspiracy theorist, and not the goverment.
This device means when you numbskulls start to get violent at some protest or another, we don't have to kill you, and you can go home when its all done.
You the protester decide, which would you rather have: tear gas rubber bullets, and some manic like me beating the fuck out of you, when some dolt smacks a cop or national guard on riot control duty. You'd go home with broken bones, and some major amounts of trauma. Or mabey, one of your freinds is dead, cause rubber bullets ain't exactly too "non-lethal" in short ranges, in fact, they can be even more deadly than reall bullets.
Or this thing. No one gets hurt, and you all live to see tommorow, and another protest.
The United States has had many ways of dealing with people it doesn't like doing things they don't like for many years. You should be happy they found a way that is completely non-harmful. Thats about as humanitarian as it gets from ANY goverment.
pretty right. ordinary camoflauge is enough for a solider running through the woods. as it is damn near imposibble to track someone in all camo darting through heavy woods. If you are standing still, natural camo is probably better at this point, and gives you more protection if the do find out where you are(ie behind a rock, with bush on you)
Now a tank on the other hand, its gonna be seen regardless how well camo painted it is. This might work nice, along with a good muffler.
Advertising for your competitor on the net can now be considered interfering with buisness, and gives companies a new reason to HATE spam.
Since companies are not nearly as anonymous as people, if a rival company spams in your name and gets your site blocked, you can take them to court, and sue the bejesus out of them(anyone remeber fuckgeneralmotors.com pointing to the ford web site????)
Don't know who did it? How about having ISPs send letters to banned websites informing them they are banned, why, and where the ads came from. That should get the ball rolling. The rest of the info of the offenders should come from suoppeanas of the servers in question.
The whole while the COMPANIES, and not the USERS sort out the whole fiasco.
Theeese are the same sorts of people that said "OK" at the DMCA and the patriot act. Mabey politicians aren't evil and corrupt, they're just plain stupid.
While everyone who has a tech sense about them knows SCO's case is full of shit, many non-tech savy CEO's are going to lean away from linux now, HP knows this, since they sell linux servers, they have to do something to keep customers from shying away.
Protect them from the big bag wolf that will never strike. Following IBM's lead, they decided to cover what ever linux claims are resolved from the case. ITs obvious they're will be none. This isn't a big company being conseincious, as much as it is a big company covering its ass.
Slashdot Mirror
motherboard and processor??
what about a case, and cables?? it all tacks another 300-400 dollars depending on what motherboard and proccessor.
First they want to know who is taking what out of the library.
Next, they don't want you taking pictures of the library.
I think I get it, they are going to round up librarians into concentration camps, the horror, oh the horror.
unless they were ment to fail...
muwahahahah
Renault, the same lovely company that made the engine for the delorean. From one POS to another.
what if the chineese goverment mandates that google hands over certian sensative search and user information statistics of foriegn citizens contained on chineese based servers???
sucks to be us right???
Its easy to this, mabey it is bullheaded of me to think that every human on this planet has the right to live under a democracy??
this person obviously has little touch on reality.
Most artists buy macs because they look well more artistic, and they are supposedly better for graphics.
The average PC user is someone with no money, looking to get on "teh intarweb" for the first time.
Anyone who really needs to get shit done with media, and knows alot about computers, ALWAYS has a customized x86.
really, well a magazine devoted to Macs seems to think so. Really its not biased, not at all.
This is as much relevent news as the posting a link to how much Jerry Fallwell hates gays, goths, the intarweb, aethists, etc.... We all know it, we don't care/wanna hear it.
We all know mac users think they are smarter than everyone else, so we really don't need it re-hashed.
the same country that gave everyone a personal identification starting with "666", just to piss the christians off.
The commies were die hard aethiests, and would go out of there way to fuck with christianity, by little things, and small jokes like this.
you will hear a bunch of soliders trampling through the woods. You will KNOW they are there. But thermal imaging in connection to rifles is not as common as you might think. There is a major acuracy loss.
I am talk about standard GIs here. Getting a bunch of soliders to be absolutely quite moving through the woods at night is another thing.
Special forces, cav scouts, and the like is its own cat and mouse game. From what I understand of it they're methods of camo are much better than a suit of what looks like whats behind you.
What might come out of this that will help the grunts is if you can but tiny little cameras and led photocells in a cream form, and smear it on your face like camo paint, puting on an expert camoflage that would take hours with conventional methods in minuetes, and could change with your surroundings, and nodes that could communicate by sending small electric pulses through your body(see old slash dot artical, look it up)
Except for the fact that Bush never declared war on Iraq.
how short term of a memory do you nimwits have.
War was declared, promplty, and publicly before we invaded.
it seems we have to shit mongers flinging poo at eachother. One is pro-war to the point it sickning, the other anti-war to the point its sickning.
Lets face it, bradleys suck, and they are just as big and bulky, not to mention slower and noiser than the M1 series.
The new stryker family of vehicles seems to be designed for urban warfare. There is a lot of debate within the tanker world if they are indeed solid vehicles. Time will tell I guess.
see in america, we got something called FILTERS, on our intakes. Its kinda complicated, and probably classified, so I won't bother trying to explain. but the M1 series rolls through sand just fine.
also, I am intrested into seeing how an infernal combustion engine works, as aposed to an internal combustion engine. If its as cool as it sounds, I think I got a new idea of what to try in shoe-horn into a nova.
the top armor of the m1 is very light for some reason, by the sides are decently armored.
If the tank is moving, they ain't exactly easy to hit in a weak spot, if you got a good driver
The major threat in iraq right now the army is concentrating on is road side bombs, and other such rellish, usually dentonated on by cell phone, or other such remote devices when a convoy gets close.
There's something to the term unauthorized demonstration that just echoes suppression.
yeah, too bad its out of the mouth of a conspiracy theorist, and not the goverment.
This device means when you numbskulls start to get violent at some protest or another, we don't have to kill you, and you can go home when its all done.
You the protester decide, which would you rather have: tear gas rubber bullets, and some manic like me beating the fuck out of you, when some dolt smacks a cop or national guard on riot control duty. You'd go home with broken bones, and some major amounts of trauma. Or mabey, one of your freinds is dead, cause rubber bullets ain't exactly too "non-lethal" in short ranges, in fact, they can be even more deadly than reall bullets.
Or this thing. No one gets hurt, and you all live to see tommorow, and another protest.
The United States has had many ways of dealing with people it doesn't like doing things they don't like for many years. You should be happy they found a way that is completely non-harmful. Thats about as humanitarian as it gets from ANY goverment.
pretty right. ordinary camoflauge is enough for a solider running through the woods. as it is damn near imposibble to track someone in all camo darting through heavy woods. If you are standing still, natural camo is probably better at this point, and gives you more protection if the do find out where you are(ie behind a rock, with bush on you)
Now a tank on the other hand, its gonna be seen regardless how well camo painted it is. This might work nice, along with a good muffler.
Yes, they can simulate the commander being killed, etc...
This poll is a motherfucking troll. Die.
AOL blocking microsoft will be funny.
Advertising for your competitor on the net can now be considered interfering with buisness, and gives companies a new reason to HATE spam.
Since companies are not nearly as anonymous as people, if a rival company spams in your name and gets your site blocked, you can take them to court, and sue the bejesus out of them(anyone remeber fuckgeneralmotors.com pointing to the ford web site????)
Don't know who did it? How about having ISPs send letters to banned websites informing them they are banned, why, and where the ads came from. That should get the ball rolling. The rest of the info of the offenders should come from suoppeanas of the servers in question.
The whole while the COMPANIES, and not the USERS sort out the whole fiasco.
Theeese are the same sorts of people that said "OK" at the DMCA and the patriot act. Mabey politicians aren't evil and corrupt, they're just plain stupid.
this looks VERY european. Next thing you know dollars would be printed on paper, and not our superstrong cloth material we use.
"It will run on windows"
at least we know it won't work right
*phew*
and I was getting nervous they might actually trying spying on people without the blue screen of death.
cause when they use to track everymovement everyone does EVERWHERE in the world.
well, they-can-do-it-COOL! attitude is going to drop real fast.
I like computers, there are just someplaces they should not stick them, especially thoose with recording devices.
SecureCRT.
Nuff said.
unless you want to full screen mud, cause you are a h4rdc0r3 l00s3r like that, which there is putty for
The gesstapo starts now
While everyone who has a tech sense about them knows SCO's case is full of shit, many non-tech savy CEO's are going to lean away from linux now, HP knows this, since they sell linux servers, they have to do something to keep customers from shying away.
Protect them from the big bag wolf that will never strike. Following IBM's lead, they decided to cover what ever linux claims are resolved from the case. ITs obvious they're will be none. This isn't a big company being conseincious, as much as it is a big company covering its ass.
actually, what its REALLING doing to do, is legitimize attacks both eletronic and physical against spammers, who will be unable to the police again.
post it here!