No one does it better to women than they do to themselves by allowing men to do it to them. They choose not to rise above base animal instincts and reward and procreate with the aggro scum who have the $$$. The Earth belongs to aggro disgusting scum until everything collaspes and burns from the consequences...
If you have money you have as much pussy as you want. You can have every type you want: Asian, African, Indian, White. You can have pussy for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
I think it's the idea though. The idea that any person walks away with that much money from a company that's purpose is ostensibly to provide services to people in different ways. Milking it for such a grotesque amount of personal gain, regardless of the outcome, is perverse and should never be rewarded. That's not the model that anyone who cares about society wants to support. On that front alone Mayer is a failure.
Firewall block for yahoo.com and all related assets. They categorically do not deserve our traffic.
What a great fucking reason if ever there was one to permanently block yahoo.com and all related domains on my firewall, as every person who cares about society should do.
There are incessant attacks from Russia & Ukraine, and there is this grubby scheming "capitalism" which is equal or worse. Block it all.
I'm not at all surprised this happened. The United States is in the midst of a major - probably the most major in it's history - crime epidemic. Probably the most major in the history of any human society.
We read in the news every week about brazen robberies and burglaries: People literally driving vehicles into store front windows, grabbing items, then speeding away. Gangs of gorilla thugs invading stores and collectively stealing everything in sight. Car break-ins are so prevalent that police do not even respond nor investigate.
And on top of it more criminals than ever are roaming the streets because the jails are way overcrowded and many jurisdictions have passed leniency laws which seriously reduce penalties for many serious crimes.
It is absolutely not surprising that something like this theft would happen. Par for the course in America 2017. This is not an accident either, its the direct result of the policies of politicians constantly trying to score "humanitarian" points by pandering to the lowest-common-denominator in society in a sickening race to the bottom that's literally leading to societal collapse. Dysgenia is in full-swing in America fueled by "compassionate" policies which are nothing more than pathological delusion bordering on the criminal.
I agree. A religious book I highly recommend is Bhikkhu Bodhi's translation of the Mahjima Nikaya (Middle Length Discourses), which are the closest things to the actual sermons that Buddha gave, as handed down by the much-less-popular-in-the-West Theravada Buddhist tradition. Most of the more well-known sermons of Buddha in the West, handed down through the more popular Mahayana tradition, were highly embellished/appended by subsequent authors to the point that they begin to bare little resemblance with Buddha's actual original teachings.
Once you get beyond the repetitive nature of the discourses (the result of their initially being handed down orally for centuries) you will fine some amazing gems from a truly brilliant and inspiring mind which still shines 2,500 years later.
After investigating this a little bit I agree that they did fuck up.
Some posts were probably just crass or vulgar. Some were insulting of races. And others were simply by people whose positions or beliefs they find to be distasteful.
People can just ignore things that offend them. Delete accounts was very much a wrong move.
Threatening violence is different than professing strong distaste for something. Most would agree that expressions of violence should not be tolerated. But what about saying you don't like something? What about saying that something is really bad (from your point of view)?
You have to be VERY careful in what you consider to be "hate". In one case its a matter of protecting the safety of people, in another its an attempt to change the way they think.
Just because someone is offended by another's thoughts doesn't give them the right to try to change them. But no one has a right to threaten anyone else.
Will Twitter get this right or will they fuck it up?
Actually that's not correct. According to Milankovich cycles we're are right at the time we should be heading into a new ice age.
I'm not an expert in climate change nor climate change policy, but the only thing I can postulate on this issues is maybe there is a positive side to taking a refreshing look at everything regarding energy policy.
While I'm not an expert, I do know that most of the proposed "clean" energy alternatives are in fact false in many ways because all the infrastructure that is behind them, that enables them to be created, maintained, etc. is still fossil-fuel based. I think James Howard Kunstler goes into this idea a little bit.
For example with solar cell, its not just a matter of how efficient a cell is - where did all the materials come from? How were the transported, processed, and assembled? What infrastructure behind all these things is assumed to exist in order for these things to be created?
When all of this is taken into account in great detail it often turns out that fossil fuels indeed are more efficient (although I'm not saying this is certainly always the case).
Given government's and the oligarchy's propensity to lie and manipulate things - especially when it comes to public policy - I can at least hypothetically appreciate how a fresh look at things might at least be helpful - for everyone involved.
I don't use FB, but guessing that its not too different than other social sites like Twitter, your statements are just wrong. You are assuming that anyone goes to FB or another social media site for "stories". FB AFAIK is not a news site. People you follow or in your friends circle or whatever may post "news" or other items, but that is not the same as an actual news site.
To make matters worse, even many "news" sites - for example the guardian - have lost their objectivity in reporting news. It used to be that their *choice* of what to cover included topics not covered by the MSM that were of interest to intellectuals, etc. But then in recent times they completely lost it and just started dolling out pure tripe for/against whatever they chose. Their "liberalness" drastically changed from choosing what to publish to changing the content of what they published to be highly biased to support their various agendas.
...that Trump won because the media could not control the narrative despite their best efforts.
That is very very true. That is almost entirely what Trump's campaign was about from day one. The guy had the guts to hold a press conference in LA a week after Kate Steinle's murder by an illegal in SF and speak openly about how appalling mass illegal immigration has become. While he was doing that almost every other politician and local, state, and federal levels were categorically refusing to even discuss one negative aspect of illegal immigration or admit that it has an adverse impacts upon Americans. At the same time the mainstream media went with a full-on major propaganda/manipulation campaign with major "stories" about how great the new wave of immigration is.
People really saw the massive extent of lies and manipulation and Trump put that issue forefront throughout his campaign.
Because of what he did the entire establishment went completely ballistic against him to an extent the likes of which have never been seen. They pulled every possible trick to smash him and take him out but he survived.
For me the defining moment of it all was when Hillary was giving her speech against the Alt Right and someone in the audience shouted "Pepe!" right as she said the words "alt right". That was a great moment and I think Hillary knew at that moment that she lost.
No, but at this point in time when humans are supposedly so intelligent, trumpeting their amazing technological achievements, why is the world so totally fucked up?
Don't you think - if we are all so smart and there are all these technologically advanced things - that thing would be getting better, not worse?
Of course I don't expect a smartphone app to be able to solve major problems. But why, at a time when we have smartphone apps and all this other highly advanced stuff, is it that things are careening on a crash course, in the wrong direction?
There are so many replete examples of things going wrong to pick from.
And personally I think there is a connection between people being motivated for more noble purposes, such as the creators of many of the foundational technologies which underlie so many things we use, and the world improving, vs. people with low motivation - ivy-leage Enron types who want to cash in - and things getting worse.
Its repugnantly nihilistic to throw one's hands in the air and just "accept" that there might be some malevolent code running on one's computer, particularly coming from someone like the head of the FBI.
It represents a failure. A failure to accept responsibility and know how one's computer works, a failure to understand the integrity of the applications that one uses, a failure to understand the integrity of the operating system, and many other things.
Slashdot Mirror
No one does it better to women than they do to themselves by allowing men to do it to them. They choose not to rise above base animal instincts and reward and procreate with the aggro scum who have the $$$. The Earth belongs to aggro disgusting scum until everything collaspes and burns from the consequences...
If you have money you have as much pussy as you want. You can have every type you want: Asian, African, Indian, White. You can have pussy for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
That's how it is.
" the company said it has no current plans to automate the jobs of cashiers"
major mistake.
replace them all. ASAP.
let's automate and reduce the world's overpopulation.
start building camps for when the last generations of unemployed, starving masses revolt.
A technical glitch in the presentation of news is more interesting than actual news.
New network is being syndicated: Technical Glitch News Network (TGNN), coming soon to your cable provider.
Electric chair the scab
This news has been out a while. Look at references #9 and #10 here.
I wouldn't really consider the process "election", more like electoral farce. Elections are bought. This is not democracy, but oligarchy.
The Congress of the United States is the greatest threat to the United States.
Here is a list of Yahoo-held assets to block on your firewall.
If you do not block these then you are an enabler of this type of corruption and abuse and are no better than Mayer.
I think it's the idea though. The idea that any person walks away with that much money from a company that's purpose is ostensibly to provide services to people in different ways. Milking it for such a grotesque amount of personal gain, regardless of the outcome, is perverse and should never be rewarded. That's not the model that anyone who cares about society wants to support. On that front alone Mayer is a failure.
Firewall block for yahoo.com and all related assets. They categorically do not deserve our traffic.
What a great fucking reason if ever there was one to permanently block yahoo.com and all related domains on my firewall, as every person who cares about society should do.
There are incessant attacks from Russia & Ukraine, and there is this grubby scheming "capitalism" which is equal or worse. Block it all.
Online CS courses at colleges kick ass. They are the wave of the future.
I'm not at all surprised this happened. The United States is in the midst of a major - probably the most major in it's history - crime epidemic. Probably the most major in the history of any human society.
We read in the news every week about brazen robberies and burglaries: People literally driving vehicles into store front windows, grabbing items, then speeding away. Gangs of gorilla thugs invading stores and collectively stealing everything in sight. Car break-ins are so prevalent that police do not even respond nor investigate.
And on top of it more criminals than ever are roaming the streets because the jails are way overcrowded and many jurisdictions have passed leniency laws which seriously reduce penalties for many serious crimes.
It is absolutely not surprising that something like this theft would happen. Par for the course in America 2017. This is not an accident either, its the direct result of the policies of politicians constantly trying to score "humanitarian" points by pandering to the lowest-common-denominator in society in a sickening race to the bottom that's literally leading to societal collapse. Dysgenia is in full-swing in America fueled by "compassionate" policies which are nothing more than pathological delusion bordering on the criminal.
I agree. A religious book I highly recommend is Bhikkhu Bodhi's translation of the Mahjima Nikaya (Middle Length Discourses), which are the closest things to the actual sermons that Buddha gave, as handed down by the much-less-popular-in-the-West Theravada Buddhist tradition. Most of the more well-known sermons of Buddha in the West, handed down through the more popular Mahayana tradition, were highly embellished/appended by subsequent authors to the point that they begin to bare little resemblance with Buddha's actual original teachings.
Once you get beyond the repetitive nature of the discourses (the result of their initially being handed down orally for centuries) you will fine some amazing gems from a truly brilliant and inspiring mind which still shines 2,500 years later.
Actually all he did in the video was put a little piece of electrical tape over the chip which applied enough pressure to fix the issue.
Get an iphone repair kit on ebay for $5. There's a YouTube video on how to open the phone and reseat the chip.
Very simple
After investigating this a little bit I agree that they did fuck up.
Some posts were probably just crass or vulgar. Some were insulting of races. And others were simply by people whose positions or beliefs they find to be distasteful.
People can just ignore things that offend them. Delete accounts was very much a wrong move.
Bad analogy because if anyone was yelling *anything* in the middle of a restaurant they'd be kicked out and have reason to be.
Threatening violence is different than professing strong distaste for something. Most would agree that expressions of violence should not be tolerated. But what about saying you don't like something? What about saying that something is really bad (from your point of view)?
You have to be VERY careful in what you consider to be "hate". In one case its a matter of protecting the safety of people, in another its an attempt to change the way they think.
Just because someone is offended by another's thoughts doesn't give them the right to try to change them. But no one has a right to threaten anyone else.
Will Twitter get this right or will they fuck it up?
Actually that's not correct. According to Milankovich cycles we're are right at the time we should be heading into a new ice age.
I'm not an expert in climate change nor climate change policy, but the only thing I can postulate on this issues is maybe there is a positive side to taking a refreshing look at everything regarding energy policy.
While I'm not an expert, I do know that most of the proposed "clean" energy alternatives are in fact false in many ways because all the infrastructure that is behind them, that enables them to be created, maintained, etc. is still fossil-fuel based. I think James Howard Kunstler goes into this idea a little bit.
For example with solar cell, its not just a matter of how efficient a cell is - where did all the materials come from? How were the transported, processed, and assembled? What infrastructure behind all these things is assumed to exist in order for these things to be created?
When all of this is taken into account in great detail it often turns out that fossil fuels indeed are more efficient (although I'm not saying this is certainly always the case).
Given government's and the oligarchy's propensity to lie and manipulate things - especially when it comes to public policy - I can at least hypothetically appreciate how a fresh look at things might at least be helpful - for everyone involved.
I don't use FB, but guessing that its not too different than other social sites like Twitter, your statements are just wrong. You are assuming that anyone goes to FB or another social media site for "stories". FB AFAIK is not a news site. People you follow or in your friends circle or whatever may post "news" or other items, but that is not the same as an actual news site.
To make matters worse, even many "news" sites - for example the guardian - have lost their objectivity in reporting news. It used to be that their *choice* of what to cover included topics not covered by the MSM that were of interest to intellectuals, etc. But then in recent times they completely lost it and just started dolling out pure tripe for/against whatever they chose. Their "liberalness" drastically changed from choosing what to publish to changing the content of what they published to be highly biased to support their various agendas.
...that Trump won because the media could not control the narrative despite their best efforts.
That is very very true. That is almost entirely what Trump's campaign was about from day one. The guy had the guts to hold a press conference in LA a week after Kate Steinle's murder by an illegal in SF and speak openly about how appalling mass illegal immigration has become. While he was doing that almost every other politician and local, state, and federal levels were categorically refusing to even discuss one negative aspect of illegal immigration or admit that it has an adverse impacts upon Americans. At the same time the mainstream media went with a full-on major propaganda/manipulation campaign with major "stories" about how great the new wave of immigration is.
People really saw the massive extent of lies and manipulation and Trump put that issue forefront throughout his campaign.
Because of what he did the entire establishment went completely ballistic against him to an extent the likes of which have never been seen. They pulled every possible trick to smash him and take him out but he survived.
For me the defining moment of it all was when Hillary was giving her speech against the Alt Right and someone in the audience shouted "Pepe!" right as she said the words "alt right". That was a great moment and I think Hillary knew at that moment that she lost.
No, but at this point in time when humans are supposedly so intelligent, trumpeting their amazing technological achievements, why is the world so totally fucked up?
Don't you think - if we are all so smart and there are all these technologically advanced things - that thing would be getting better, not worse?
Of course I don't expect a smartphone app to be able to solve major problems. But why, at a time when we have smartphone apps and all this other highly advanced stuff, is it that things are careening on a crash course, in the wrong direction?
There are so many replete examples of things going wrong to pick from.
And personally I think there is a connection between people being motivated for more noble purposes, such as the creators of many of the foundational technologies which underlie so many things we use, and the world improving, vs. people with low motivation - ivy-leage Enron types who want to cash in - and things getting worse.
Its repugnantly nihilistic to throw one's hands in the air and just "accept" that there might be some malevolent code running on one's computer, particularly coming from someone like the head of the FBI.
It represents a failure. A failure to accept responsibility and know how one's computer works, a failure to understand the integrity of the applications that one uses, a failure to understand the integrity of the operating system, and many other things.
Its not a wise nor prudent move, its failure.
This is not the same forum as askubuntu.com?