"The core of the problem is that government has gotten too big"
Fixed.
If the government were not in a position to grant special favors to companies because it is regulating everything in sight, then business would have no use buying off politicians.
U.S. Navy Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center reported finding neutron bursts when using heavy water electrolysis, though their claims were not accepted by the mainstream scientific community.
So Phil is calling these guys out? Is the "mainstream scientific community" calling them out?
I can't image that the NSNWSC would employ a bunch of dolts and I would expect that people would at least be intrigued instead of tuning up their noses and dismissing the findings out of hand.
Just glancing at the headline I thought this might be an interesting article and discussion. But just the first sentence shows it for what it is, yet another "Sky is Falling if our funding is cut" article.
There may actually be a legitimate need for tin foil hats in that case.
So let me see how this goes:
"The public won't accept it" (Nuclear power) so we should stop all research and development and shit can the existing plants.
But the public expresses doubt about AGW or at least the proposed solutions and, let me guess, they need education and persuasion; must be convinced for all our sakes.
Why do people always look for pie in the sky solutions that won't be ready for ten years and would never be able to provide the generation capacity to meet base load requirements? Nuclear is here now, works and when managed correctly is perfectly safe. It also has great potential for technological advancement and even greater safety.
While I'm on the fence about the tax, I am definitely with you on making high frequency trading as difficult and least profitable as possible.
HFT is what crashes markets at a moment's notice. It can destroy companies in a matter of minutes. And it also an affront to the entire concept of a market where well informed buyers make well informed decisions about the value of a product.
"The environmental impacts of shale development are challenging but manageable." The study addressed groundwater contamination, noting "There has been concern that these fractures can also penetrate shallow freshwater zones and contaminate them with fracturing uid, but there is no evidence that this is occurring"
Think about it, you spend all this money drilling a well thousands and thousands of feet to reach whatever you are after and you'd just let seep away into sand formations on the way up?
Then there's the pesky thing about the hold collapsing on itself when you withdraw the drilling pipe.
Hold it upside down and take off the cap. Did the pressurized fluids rise? Hold it horizontally and take off the cap. Did the pressurized fluids rise?
It depends on the container doesn't it?
If there is a non-permeable cap above the gas reservoir, then no, the pressurized fluids won't rise. They will move horizontally, as intended. And guess what? The gas is down that deep because there is a non-permeable cap above the reservoir.
Slashdot Mirror
That would explain the urine, feces, various and numerous communicable diseases, shootings, rapes and of course, the drumming.
Unfortunately, they don't even do that in TFA, that I could see.
"The core of the problem is that government has gotten too big"
Fixed.
If the government were not in a position to grant special favors to companies because it is regulating everything in sight, then business would have no use buying off politicians.
U.S. Navy Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center reported finding neutron bursts when using heavy water electrolysis, though their claims were not accepted by the mainstream scientific community.
So Phil is calling these guys out? Is the "mainstream scientific community" calling them out?
I can't image that the NSNWSC would employ a bunch of dolts and I would expect that people would at least be intrigued instead of tuning up their noses and dismissing the findings out of hand.
Just glancing at the headline I thought this might be an interesting article and discussion. But just the first sentence shows it for what it is, yet another "Sky is Falling if our funding is cut" article.
I just dropped a dime on a new 55" HD TV.
My last TV (32" tube") from the early nineties is still going strong in another home.
So they will have had at least two "new" TVs before I'm ready to buy again.
It isn't selling because 3-D TV for the home is stupid.
It's pretty ridicules for the theater too.
No, dumb ass, I'm American and you are an embarrassment.
I give you, an Ugly America.
Without a functioning economy, your entire life may not be that long.
House would be impressed.
AC Fight!
solar sails beaming microwaves to the ground.
What?
There may actually be a legitimate need for tin foil hats in that case.
So let me see how this goes:
"The public won't accept it" (Nuclear power) so we should stop all research and development and shit can the existing plants.
But the public expresses doubt about AGW or at least the proposed solutions and, let me guess, they need education and persuasion; must be convinced for all our sakes.
Why do people always look for pie in the sky solutions that won't be ready for ten years and would never be able to provide the generation capacity to meet base load requirements? Nuclear is here now, works and when managed correctly is perfectly safe. It also has great potential for technological advancement and even greater safety.
If jogging in place for 13 years isn't "stability" I don't know what is
Stagnating?
While I'm on the fence about the tax, I am definitely with you on making high frequency trading as difficult and least profitable as possible.
HFT is what crashes markets at a moment's notice. It can destroy companies in a matter of minutes. And it also an affront to the entire concept of a market where well informed buyers make well informed decisions about the value of a product.
"The environmental impacts of shale development are challenging but manageable." The study addressed groundwater contamination, noting "There has been concern that these fractures can also penetrate shallow freshwater zones and contaminate them with fracturing uid, but there is no evidence that this is occurring"
Do you drive this angrily also?
MIT does.
And BTW, "The environmental impacts of shale development are challenging but manageable." The study addressed groundwater contamination, noting "There has been concern that these fractures can also penetrate shallow freshwater zones and contaminate them with fracturing uid, but there is no evidence that this is occurring".
Then you have an problem with any product recovered from a well...oil, gas, etc. Because that's how they all get to the surface.
Read the whole thread...I did.
All wells are sleeved.
Think about it, you spend all this money drilling a well thousands and thousands of feet to reach whatever you are after and you'd just let seep away into sand formations on the way up?
Then there's the pesky thing about the hold collapsing on itself when you withdraw the drilling pipe.
ALL wells use casing.
I see your Youtube and raise you an actual study.
Take a soda bottle and shake it up.
Hold it upside down and take off the cap. Did the pressurized fluids rise?
Hold it horizontally and take off the cap. Did the pressurized fluids rise?
It depends on the container doesn't it?
If there is a non-permeable cap above the gas reservoir, then no, the pressurized fluids won't rise. They will move horizontally, as intended. And guess what? The gas is down that deep because there is a non-permeable cap above the reservoir.
Wrong.