This is how we ended up with company provided health care benefits. During WWII and the wage freezes, companies started offering it as a way to entice potential/or keep employees since they couldn’t offer more money.
Perhaps it's because the "Christian version of this" doesn't involve beating your wife, pedophilia, honor killings, etc.
I personally know several Progressive Democrats. To a one they are ignorant about fiscal matters and they usually bitch and moan about any number of minorities. Guess that makes them bigoted also. Which, by your definition makes the entire Democratic party fiscally ignorant and bigoted.
There are people who loosely organize gatherings under the label of "Tea Party" but there is no organization that can deny anyone from being in the "party". If anything it's analogous to calling yorself a Progressive.
As for Shraia law, there are groups who's stated goal is to institute Sharai in the U.S. They are small fringe groups to be sure, but they exist.
Your view of the people who label themselves as Tea Partiers is derived from incoherent news achors and Democrat party mouth pieces. You may want to actually look into the ideas these people have. You might find yourself agreeing with them if you truely have an open mind.
People get tired of buying a whole a fucking new player and new versions of their favorite movies every few years because some duchebag company tries to push the latest thing.
Ahh...but what if you trusted your mechanic to fix your car properly, but you have never driven a car before and have no idea what "properly" means? You have no means to evaluate whether the car was fixed properly or not (assuming it runs and generally performs as a car should). You have only the word of the mechanic that it is expected to get 5 miles per gallon and backfire and want to go left all the time (NASCAR mechanic).
If you cannot confirm the truth of a statement yourself, then you are left with simply believing the mechanic without evidence.
People who do not have the expertise and experience in any given area of science can only trust that those who do are providing accurate and reliable information. They could rig the experiments, fudge the numbers, etc. and your average person would not be in a position to know it. All they can know is that this/these guys are experts so what they say must be true.
"The rest of us rely on experts to explain it, someone who has seen and understood the truth and can dumb it down for us in a language we can understand"
Because of this, for its own protection, Science should be politicaly neutral in all things.
It is one thing for Science to say this is happening or that is happening. It's quite another for it Science to say that we should re-order our society because of it. That is not the place of Science. And because your average individual is not able to reasonably question the science without a considerable amount of effort, if at all, they are left in a position of being told, "do this becase I'm an expert".
Only when Science is perceived to have no stake in how the science is interpreted and acted upon, vis-a-vis public policy, can it be compeletely trusted by those who don't have the means to question it.
The quadratic equation is an exellent example of diagraming the sentence. In and of itself, it doesn't have an obvious use. But as ackthpt points out, it is part of a process that is useful.
So this approach would be something like this:
In the real world you have to plan your financial arrangements. When you graduate and get a job you will need to figure out how much you afford to pay for housing and gas and how far away you can live. Here is how to do it...
Slashdot Mirror
Kids wouldn't be hungry if Sally Fields would just give the kids a fucking sandwich from their Hotel.
Spoken like a true AC...In this case COWARD is the operative word.
Well, the Left is always bitching about over population. Whatys your problem then?
(Other than the fact the millions of people WILL NOT die in the third world...at least not from that Hydra called AGW.)
Anecdotally = Pulled it out of your ass.
This is how we ended up with company provided health care benefits. During WWII and the wage freezes, companies started offering it as a way to entice potential/or keep employees since they couldn’t offer more money.
"Only the most skilled need apply"
How many important inventions were simply the result of someone with an idea and a desire to see it to market rather than "only the most skilled"?
I bet they would be surprised at the stuff that comes from people who are not considered to be the cream of the crop.
Ribbons? RIBBONS?
The most useless POS interface ever.
"they are overly specialized"
What's the old saying...they know everything there is to know about nothing?
I think this wheel has been done over and over again. Pretty much just rearranging the bureaucracy around the process.
Perhaps it's because the "Christian version of this" doesn't involve beating your wife, pedophilia, honor killings, etc.
I personally know several Progressive Democrats. To a one they are ignorant about fiscal matters and they usually bitch and moan about any number of minorities. Guess that makes them bigoted also. Which, by your definition makes the entire Democratic party fiscally ignorant and bigoted.
"Dude" There is no "Tea Party".
There are people who loosely organize gatherings under the label of "Tea Party" but there is no organization that can deny anyone from being in the "party". If anything it's analogous to calling yorself a Progressive.
As for Shraia law, there are groups who's stated goal is to institute Sharai in the U.S. They are small fringe groups to be sure, but they exist.
Your view of the people who label themselves as Tea Partiers is derived from incoherent news achors and Democrat party mouth pieces. You may want to actually look into the ideas these people have. You might find yourself agreeing with them if you truely have an open mind.
"Wasting money on this to make the unemployed seem less desirable is just cruel and disturbing."
This and other wasteful spending is what motivates the Tea Party, not bigotry, as ignorant fools from the Left would have you believe.
Is it MMOG?
I was going to suggest you include a sarcasm tag. But it's obvious you belive this crap with all your heart.
Strike "I", replace with "It".
"...and even literally cane each other bloody on the floor of their respective houses..."
I think we need more of that. I would probably make the debate more civil.
" so that Twitter will end up gathering a body of reasoned debate"
In what....180 characters or something like that?
Exactly.
People get tired of buying a whole a fucking new player and new versions of their favorite movies every few years because some duchebag company tries to push the latest thing.
Get one.
Use it.
Oh look...an A.C, talking shit.
Example: The Saccharin scare. How many times have scientists made claims which required immediate action or people will die?
Just look at all the "studies" that claim you should eat more of this and less of that...or more of that and less of this...wait...we mean....
This kind of stuff creates scientific cynics.
Ahh...but what if you trusted your mechanic to fix your car properly, but you have never driven a car before and have no idea what "properly" means? You have no means to evaluate whether the car was fixed properly or not (assuming it runs and generally performs as a car should). You have only the word of the mechanic that it is expected to get 5 miles per gallon and backfire and want to go left all the time (NASCAR mechanic).
If you cannot confirm the truth of a statement yourself, then you are left with simply believing the mechanic without evidence.
Everyone is missing the point.
People who do not have the expertise and experience in any given area of science can only trust that those who do are providing accurate and reliable information. They could rig the experiments, fudge the numbers, etc. and your average person would not be in a position to know it. All they can know is that this/these guys are experts so what they say must be true.
That is pretty much the same thing as Faith.
"The rest of us rely on experts to explain it, someone who has seen and understood the truth and can dumb it down for us in a language we can understand"
Because of this, for its own protection, Science should be politicaly neutral in all things.
It is one thing for Science to say this is happening or that is happening. It's quite another for it Science to say that we should re-order our society because of it. That is not the place of Science. And because your average individual is not able to reasonably question the science without a considerable amount of effort, if at all, they are left in a position of being told, "do this becase I'm an expert".
Only when Science is perceived to have no stake in how the science is interpreted and acted upon, vis-a-vis public policy, can it be compeletely trusted by those who don't have the means to question it.
The quadratic equation is an exellent example of diagraming the sentence. In and of itself, it doesn't have an obvious use. But as ackthpt points out, it is part of a process that is useful.
So this approach would be something like this:
In the real world you have to plan your financial arrangements. When you graduate and get a job you will need to figure out how much you afford to pay for housing and gas and how far away you can live. Here is how to do it...