http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&cid=27831377 and you can call me all the names you wish, you are reduced to name calling like most frustrated children or noobs in this science are when they mess up and shoot their mouths off while inserting their foot into their mouth as you have with false accusations, technical errors on the topics, and most of all your trolling here (you certainly are not big on proof though you demand it of others and they provide it) I mean, least of all the statement you made that you are a programmer, because no programmer I know would screw up as much as you have on this forums in 2 to 3 days time as you have been shown to do in the posting above). Happy now, with your trolling? See what it got you? You are running yourself off this forums with screw ups and it is hilarious. Anyone is free to read the link I just posted for a good laugh though it comes at the expense of your reputation on slashdot. You brought it on yourself troll.
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27837223 sure you're cool as a cucumber (in a furnace), because you are making one screwup after another, just as you did here - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&cid=27831377 where all of your errors so far in this exchange have been exposed. You can't even query google properly and that was shown in the second url I posted. You say you're a programmer but there is no way you have tried to prove that though you demand it of others, and even if you could, based on your poor performance here it is obvious you are either not one and are lying or are crappy at it. Your choice, there are no other options so pick one. That's how many options I will leave you based on your errors and false accusations here and your inability to even query google right or know the meaning of simple acronyms like bsp which you had to ask for and I answered it for you and I am just a user.
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&cid=27831925 rotflmao. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy (than this trolling error spewing liar named ion.simon.c) To others reading - Yes, and I am trolling him myself and laughing all the while. How can I help it once I read the link I posted? Ion.simon.c likes to troll others, and I hate trolls, so I am only giving him his own medicine so he can see how it feels. I looked at ion.simon.c's post history and trust me he has this coming.
rotflmao @ ion.simon.c, you said this - "'ve already "gotten the better" of you" here - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27825529 and I hate to tell you the obvious, but far from it. Looks to be the other way around in fact, with the ac apk trashing you and mostly with your own mistakes which I found rather funhy. Also, when the ac apk posted this in reply - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&cid=27831377 showing all the technical mistakes you made, even something easy like querying google for pete's sake, you messed up large. You state you're a programmer, so I will just say what you kept repeating endlessly to apk, which is prove it. You kept acting the ass afterwards, even after the ac apk put up quite the impressive list of times his works and wares have been in written publications or doing well at respected technical contests like Microsoft TechEd too, in the sciences of computing from as far back as 13 years ago up until present time or near to it in 2007 or 2008. You by way of comparison are unable to do anything like that despite your stating you have been at this since the 80's in that exchange. Based on all of this, there is no way you could ever successfully convince me that you are a programmer. You can't even query google right.
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&cid=27831825 ion.simon.c, do you now see where your trolling crap takes you? Straight to "the land of humiliation and being laughed off slashdot" is where. Couldn't happen to a bigger idiot than you ion.simon.c and this entire website's been laughing at you for the last 12 hours or more now once that and others facts of your technical blunders here were exposed in that link above. You say you are a programmer, and though you ask others to prove their points as you had apk and he did quite convincingly, you had nothing like the lists he put out in that thread link above. My Lord, thanks for the laugh and showing us how stupid someone can be in your poor performance here. Just based on your largely incorrect and erroneous responses here I know that is not true, about your stating you are a programmer, and you are just another lying troll.
See here troll - http://www.bitpipe.com/tlist/Broadband-Service-Providers.html Then again we already know you can't even get a google query right from this example of that here on this forums - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&cid=27831377 where you said you went looking for something involving the ac apk helping Doctor Mark Russinovich with his work in pagedefrag and it was right there once he proved you can't even run a query right on Google. You say you're a programmer in this thread, prove it (after all, you asked that of apk and he did with an impressive and overwhelming list of proofs to that effect, and you by comparison have nothing to your credit). Go away troll. You're no programmer, ha, you can't even get a google query correct.
Even I know that. It's an acronym for a "broadband service provider" troll. You're the googler here though you messed up on something as simple as that too, lol, here - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&cid=27831377 You say you're a coder and you don't know that? You really are a lame liar ion.simon.c so take your "I am a programmer" trolling lie someplace else. You are too stupid to fool any of us and especially at this point. Now I am trolling you and laughing at you, because you say you are a programmer and you cannot even google something properly. I'll give you one thing. You are amusing in a fool's kind of way. You keep making mistakes and making your opponent look all the more stronger in your doing so. You tried to take on a tiger by taking it by its tail and are now reaping the rewards of that (you look like a stuttering mistake making idiot).
That dumbass ion.simon.c can't even google something right, lol, see here - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27831079 lmao unbelievable, and this moron ion.simon.c says he is a programmer? No way. He's another done nothing useful or good with his life troll is all.
Oh, this is good. How would you know that if you said you cannot see it? It's an article by Dr. Mark Russinovich and it is where Jeremy Reimer, Jarrett DeAngelis, and Jay Little (artechnica members all) were caught libelling, threatening apk and his family no less (that is when the law got involved and it stopped all 3 of them cold) and where each of the was caught impersonating not only apk, but also a Mr. Marty Meszaros, and then with them posting as others under "alternate guises" as they called them and were then caught admitting to it (waarheid=veritas) over at Jeremy Reimer's own forums at his osy website. These arstechnica morons are as laughable as you are ion.simon.c and I suspect you are just another one like them. A jealous scumbag who has never accomplished anything worth noting by those in publication in this science, which apk has shown us a ton of he has from as far back as 13 years ago or more, and you have not a single thing like them to your credit by way of comparison. Prove to us you are a programmer, and even if you can, which I doubt? I would just say as was said to you here a few times now, that you're not good at it or you would have been recognized as that by those in the media around this science. You are a troll and not even good at that.
Your questions have been answered as well as your being shown in error here repeatedly ion.simon.c in the post parent to your own as well as many times in this thread where you were shown to have accused apk of things regarding his hosts file (which you admitted you screwed up on) and also about his security guide (where you stated he did not go into things like securing services or disabling vulnerable ones). You either skim, or are just another losing his ass troll who is now going off topic to try to troll others even more. You are a programmer you say? Prove it (that's what you said to apk and he blew you away with a quite impressive list of accomplishments to his credit, where you laughingly have not even a single one). You are a pitiful example of how low a human being can be ion.simon.c and thus I cannot even credit you as being a good troll. You can't match your opponents achievements, and also have made more mistakes than he did on technical issues (only thing is, apk has not made a single one yet, inclusive especially of his stating how selinx works via kernel hooks and you tried to say Microsoft's debug dump of selinux showing kernel hooking is insufficient? Give us a break you know nothing troll ion.simon.c)
You're a troll ion.simon.c, and not very good at it either. You made so many mistakes up there that apk documented that you are just now embarrassed into having to try to goad him via your off topic trolling. Do you think you are pulling the wool over anyone's eyes here with your off topic bullshit? By no means. I read both of your statements here and apk backs everything he says where you have no proof of even your being a programmer (though you asked it of apk and he put out an impressive list of things he has done around this science, and despite your probable lie that you are a programmer when you stated it, you have nothing, not even 1 thing that was noted as good in this science, where apk had 10 of them). You can't even match the 'modded up' posts count he had and you are a registered user. Lord knows the "elitists" amongst the registered users here often avoid ac posts (like apk does) and certainly for modding them upwards. You should be able to blow his mod up posts count away, however as usual, you have no proof of your doing better. Typical troll is what you are and not even good at that just judging by the counts of errors you have made here on things technical in this discussion.
How apk uses P.B. Shelley's quoted excerpt fits here quite nicely. You looked upon his works and must despair, hahaha, because you have zero to compare to his rather large list of accomplishments around this science, despite you saying you have used computers since the late 1980's. I hate to point out the obvious ion.simon.c, but you have not accomplished much, otherwise you would have put up proofs of your status allegedly as a programmer in this science since you stated you are. I don't believe it because you make too many technical mistakes and I read them when apk noted them. If you are a coder then you must stink at it. You ion.simon.c claimed to be a programmer and then you asked for proof of apk's status in the science of computing. He put up so many proofs this way in the way of verifiable achievements in this science that I found it impressive in fact, especially considering he blows away anything to that effect (proving his status as a pro in this science) you had, which was, laughingly, nothing on your part ion.simon.c, so give up. You trolled and were destroyed here for it by your own stupidity and numerous errors which apk also documented and I read them. I believe you are a professional in this field as much as anyone might believe I am Barack Obama. You're nothing but a stupid troll ion.simon.c, face it.
Alongside the article over at windows it pro forums called the memory optimization hoax and there apk stated the same as he has here and dr. russinovich never replied otherwise as to apk and he doing work for the same companies in the 1990s and that apk helped him find and fix problems in his pagedefrag program. That's official enough for me and please don't try to cover for your own inadequacy in computer sciences saying that's insufficient. What IS insufficient is your lack of proof you are a programmer since you ask proof of others of their roles in this science as you had to apk and he blew you away with his proofs and amount of it as well as achievements he has to his credit where you laughingly have zero to compare, let alone prove your bullshit that you are a programmer. If you are a programmer then I am Barack Obama. Give up ion.simon.c you inadequate jealous troll.
HOSTS files are used in security, as is the other point apk covered on wfp versus how older windows did a 3 part phalanx zone defense like arrangement for securing ip traffic. It is on topic, because this is about windows and security and hosts files plus filtering are portions of microsoft windows' own security system. You stated you are a programmer in this posting and it is clear you are not and just some lying amateur, because when you asked apk to prove he is a pro in this science he did so with numerous examples and accomplishments in this science. You by the same token had nothing like them. apk more than answered your questions where you said "windows has nothing like selinux" and apk pointed out acl's and how they have been in NT\2000\XP\Server 2003 since their conception unlike Linux using kernel hooking seLinux. apk was completely correct and so much so you had to try the 'troll tactic' of saying "that is insufficient" and the article goes into it more in depth as to how kernel hooking works and proved selinux does as apk said it does, uses kernel hooks to achieve what Nt-based OS' always have had natively. Go away you jealous little nobody troll ion.simon.c, you have lost badly.
He certainly shut you up about how selinux implements things like windows access control lists in mandatory access control and also that selinux uses kernel hooks which you doubted and he produced a stack trace debug dump of selinux from microsoft themselves to prove it. You tried to say "that is insufficient" only because it blew away your trolling garbage and once I read that article I actually learned a thing or two, so thanks apk. Ion.simon.c, thanks for the amusement and showing us all you are a victim of your own hubris and that you stuck your foot in your mouth a dozen times and are now off topic trolling to try to bury the evidences of your mistakes here through this posting. I read the list of errors you made here that apk put up and you are one stupid sob who claims he is a programmer (prove it, apk did, and you can't) and is clearly not.
The word MOAR doesn't exist in the english language moron. You ran out of things to say after you were caught in a dozen errors in this thread ion.simon.c and all you have is off topic evasions and attempts at burying evidences of you being in error so many times in this post that it is not even amusing anymore. You say you are a programmer. Prove it. At least apk had some evidences to that much and his accomplishments, which you have none of given that you can't produce a list of evidences like his. He did more a decade ago up to recently than you have in this science in your entire time in it. Prove otherwise.
If anyone here is tired, it is us reading your repeated mistakes and off topic posts in this thread, ion.simon.c. So, ion.simon.c, You claim to be a programmer. Prove it. That's what you said to apk and he blew you away with a lot of evidence to that effect as to his professional status in this science and his accomplishments in it, as well as he showing you in error here a dozen times or more by now on technical issues being discussed. Give up, you lost badly, ion.simon.c, and it is obvious you are just trying to troll him now. I will say one thing in your defense: You are so stupid that it is hilarious watching you try to save face and cover your mistakes by trying to bury apk's replies, but as you can see, I can see and have read them also and man, did you ever lose and badly.
I read apk's reply and he more than answered your questions, and provided a link that actually even proves what he stated that selinux uses kernel hooking to achieve what it does on Linux, and that windows nt family of operating systems has had something like that natively already built in since day 1 in acl's. Quit trolling ion.simon.c, because you have lost miserably and make a dozen or more mistakes here and they were documented in apk's answers here which made me laugh at how badly you have done in this exchange, error after error on your end. You call yourself a programmer? You have no proof of it, where apk does, and provided it at your request. You then laughingly try to lessen what he has accomplished, because you have nothing like it. You are a jealous troll that messes up on technr ical points here as well. Grow up, accept that you lost, and move on troll. I know you are full of it and you're no longer even amusing.
I've read the article over at windows it pro magazine since I am a subscribing member there and Jeremy Reimer, Jarrett DeAngelis, and Jay Little impersonated apk on Reimer's website and admitted to it (only after their isp's busted them for email harassing apk, and then Reimer's hosting provider for his website removed parts of Reimer's website for libelling apk as well as threatening his family like a psyhopath would which got canadian law enforcement involved (and reimer backed off fast at that point and had to or go to court and jail)). It is therefore quite obvious that moron Reimer did the same over at arstechnica, the home of the trolling loser online.
You must realize that you do not speak for everyone here you dyslexic mental defective. It's no one's fault your dull and damaged brain is adversely affected by your natural stupidity and defective brain, and that you need 1st grade remedial reading level retraining for reading properly on your part. You obviously also lack technical prowess and proficiency in this field and on this topic because of your stupid reply here to which I am responding to. Why don't you try to contribute meaningful data on the topic at hand instead, you off topic anonymous luser post? You can't because you're stupid and you know it. All you have is your garbage off topic replies.
Why don't you try him directly on any points he made, because I have watched the AC apk trash many an ambiguous idiot like yourself here many times the past 5 years now. I think you don't dare hit on any of the points he made specifically, like by quoting them, because you do not possess the knowledge in computers to attempt to do so primarily, but also that you know you'll get shredded if you try it. The best you have was the crap about being drunk, but personally I think you're nothing and were rightfully told to phuk off here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1213751&cid=27749317 as you were. I hope you grow some testicles and try mess with him on any of his points via quotes and I will watch him rip you in half as he usually does versus you incompetent "I will respond with slurs and general garbage instead of specifics, because you are clearly of that type of incompetent ilk.
I haven't had to look into how to do so in Vista yet.
by mjm1231 (751545) Alter Relationship on Thursday April 23, @03:28PM (#27692705)
I know that replacing the SAM file under %windir%\system32\config with a SAM that has no password assigned is a way to blow by the password security in Windows NT variants. SysInternals NT locksmith (or their graphical bootup recovery disk) pretty much do the same thing but make it simpler in that you don't need a bootable Linux or DOS Operating System to do it from (which also means they would need an ntfs filesystem read/write capable driver also in order to do so). Hope I am correct on this, as it has been years since I read of and tried some of these things.
Slashdot Mirror
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&cid=27831377 and you can call me all the names you wish, you are reduced to name calling like most frustrated children or noobs in this science are when they mess up and shoot their mouths off while inserting their foot into their mouth as you have with false accusations, technical errors on the topics, and most of all your trolling here (you certainly are not big on proof though you demand it of others and they provide it) I mean, least of all the statement you made that you are a programmer, because no programmer I know would screw up as much as you have on this forums in 2 to 3 days time as you have been shown to do in the posting above). Happy now, with your trolling? See what it got you? You are running yourself off this forums with screw ups and it is hilarious. Anyone is free to read the link I just posted for a good laugh though it comes at the expense of your reputation on slashdot. You brought it on yourself troll.
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27837223 sure you're cool as a cucumber (in a furnace), because you are making one screwup after another, just as you did here - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&cid=27831377 where all of your errors so far in this exchange have been exposed. You can't even query google properly and that was shown in the second url I posted. You say you're a programmer but there is no way you have tried to prove that though you demand it of others, and even if you could, based on your poor performance here it is obvious you are either not one and are lying or are crappy at it. Your choice, there are no other options so pick one. That's how many options I will leave you based on your errors and false accusations here and your inability to even query google right or know the meaning of simple acronyms like bsp which you had to ask for and I answered it for you and I am just a user.
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&cid=27831925 rotflmao. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy (than this trolling error spewing liar named ion.simon.c) To others reading - Yes, and I am trolling him myself and laughing all the while. How can I help it once I read the link I posted? Ion.simon.c likes to troll others, and I hate trolls, so I am only giving him his own medicine so he can see how it feels. I looked at ion.simon.c's post history and trust me he has this coming.
rotflmao @ ion.simon.c, you said this - "'ve already "gotten the better" of you" here - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27825529 and I hate to tell you the obvious, but far from it. Looks to be the other way around in fact, with the ac apk trashing you and mostly with your own mistakes which I found rather funhy. Also, when the ac apk posted this in reply - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&cid=27831377 showing all the technical mistakes you made, even something easy like querying google for pete's sake, you messed up large. You state you're a programmer, so I will just say what you kept repeating endlessly to apk, which is prove it. You kept acting the ass afterwards, even after the ac apk put up quite the impressive list of times his works and wares have been in written publications or doing well at respected technical contests like Microsoft TechEd too, in the sciences of computing from as far back as 13 years ago up until present time or near to it in 2007 or 2008. You by way of comparison are unable to do anything like that despite your stating you have been at this since the 80's in that exchange. Based on all of this, there is no way you could ever successfully convince me that you are a programmer. You can't even query google right.
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&cid=27831825 ion.simon.c, do you now see where your trolling crap takes you? Straight to "the land of humiliation and being laughed off slashdot" is where. Couldn't happen to a bigger idiot than you ion.simon.c and this entire website's been laughing at you for the last 12 hours or more now once that and others facts of your technical blunders here were exposed in that link above. You say you are a programmer, and though you ask others to prove their points as you had apk and he did quite convincingly, you had nothing like the lists he put out in that thread link above. My Lord, thanks for the laugh and showing us how stupid someone can be in your poor performance here. Just based on your largely incorrect and erroneous responses here I know that is not true, about your stating you are a programmer, and you are just another lying troll.
See here troll - http://www.bitpipe.com/tlist/Broadband-Service-Providers.html Then again we already know you can't even get a google query right from this example of that here on this forums - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&cid=27831377 where you said you went looking for something involving the ac apk helping Doctor Mark Russinovich with his work in pagedefrag and it was right there once he proved you can't even run a query right on Google. You say you're a programmer in this thread, prove it (after all, you asked that of apk and he did with an impressive and overwhelming list of proofs to that effect, and you by comparison have nothing to your credit). Go away troll. You're no programmer, ha, you can't even get a google query correct.
Even I know that. It's an acronym for a "broadband service provider" troll. You're the googler here though you messed up on something as simple as that too, lol, here - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&cid=27831377 You say you're a coder and you don't know that? You really are a lame liar ion.simon.c so take your "I am a programmer" trolling lie someplace else. You are too stupid to fool any of us and especially at this point. Now I am trolling you and laughing at you, because you say you are a programmer and you cannot even google something properly. I'll give you one thing. You are amusing in a fool's kind of way. You keep making mistakes and making your opponent look all the more stronger in your doing so. You tried to take on a tiger by taking it by its tail and are now reaping the rewards of that (you look like a stuttering mistake making idiot).
That dumbass ion.simon.c can't even google something right, lol, see here - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27831079 lmao unbelievable, and this moron ion.simon.c says he is a programmer? No way. He's another done nothing useful or good with his life troll is all.
Oh, this is good. How would you know that if you said you cannot see it? It's an article by Dr. Mark Russinovich and it is where Jeremy Reimer, Jarrett DeAngelis, and Jay Little (artechnica members all) were caught libelling, threatening apk and his family no less (that is when the law got involved and it stopped all 3 of them cold) and where each of the was caught impersonating not only apk, but also a Mr. Marty Meszaros, and then with them posting as others under "alternate guises" as they called them and were then caught admitting to it (waarheid=veritas) over at Jeremy Reimer's own forums at his osy website. These arstechnica morons are as laughable as you are ion.simon.c and I suspect you are just another one like them. A jealous scumbag who has never accomplished anything worth noting by those in publication in this science, which apk has shown us a ton of he has from as far back as 13 years ago or more, and you have not a single thing like them to your credit by way of comparison. Prove to us you are a programmer, and even if you can, which I doubt? I would just say as was said to you here a few times now, that you're not good at it or you would have been recognized as that by those in the media around this science. You are a troll and not even good at that.
Your questions have been answered as well as your being shown in error here repeatedly ion.simon.c in the post parent to your own as well as many times in this thread where you were shown to have accused apk of things regarding his hosts file (which you admitted you screwed up on) and also about his security guide (where you stated he did not go into things like securing services or disabling vulnerable ones). You either skim, or are just another losing his ass troll who is now going off topic to try to troll others even more. You are a programmer you say? Prove it (that's what you said to apk and he blew you away with a quite impressive list of accomplishments to his credit, where you laughingly have not even a single one). You are a pitiful example of how low a human being can be ion.simon.c and thus I cannot even credit you as being a good troll. You can't match your opponents achievements, and also have made more mistakes than he did on technical issues (only thing is, apk has not made a single one yet, inclusive especially of his stating how selinx works via kernel hooks and you tried to say Microsoft's debug dump of selinux showing kernel hooking is insufficient? Give us a break you know nothing troll ion.simon.c)
What a joke you are ion.simon.c in saying you got the better of apk. Is making mistakes now considered getting the better of people around this website? Because your mistakes here: [list]1.) HOSTS files -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27803005%5B/list%5D [list]2.) DNS Servers -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27798027%5B/list%5D [list]3.) Logon scripts & Group Policies usage -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27800951 [list]4.) SeLinux being implemented via kernel hooking/kernel patching -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27806379%5B/list%5D [list]5.) Services patching &/or cutoffs for security -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27802917%5B/list%5D [list]6.) What the definition of "System Hardening" is -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27800687 [list]7.) Your 1st post thought my guide was about speed, & instead it is about security -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27794633%5B/list%5D [list]8.) Here was your FIRST instance of "correcting yourself"/admitting I was correct -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27803103%5B/list%5D [list]9.) Here was where you FIRST asked me to "prove who I am" -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27804053 (give us all a break!)[/list] [list]10.) Here you said I was not enforcing policies in my security guide, & you made another mistake on that -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27801155%5B/list%5D [list]11.) Here was your 2nd instance of "correcting yourself" (amending your questions to try to "make me wrong" & you failed again) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27803601%5B/list%5D 12.) YOU also said my guide being posted here NEVER gets "modded up"? I showed QUITE the contrary here -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1219095&cid=27803307%5B/list%5D [list]13.) You're clear INABILITY to even GOOGLE something right, @ the top of THIS post - http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1221343&threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=27831377%5B/list%5D Show whom got the better of whom, and it doesn't look at all like you got the better of apk, in fact it seems to be quite the reverse with that list of errors you have made here, along with false accusations you had to 'correct' and admit later you were wrong on a few times according to those url's above and your own quoted words in them. Give up you trolling loser, and prove you are a programmer since you asked apk to do so and he put out a list of proofs that were impressive I felt, whereas you had nothing even remotely like the 10 he had and you cannot even match apk's mod up posts count here and he is an ac no less (and everyone knows the "elitis
You're a troll ion.simon.c, and not very good at it either. You made so many mistakes up there that apk documented that you are just now embarrassed into having to try to goad him via your off topic trolling. Do you think you are pulling the wool over anyone's eyes here with your off topic bullshit? By no means. I read both of your statements here and apk backs everything he says where you have no proof of even your being a programmer (though you asked it of apk and he put out an impressive list of things he has done around this science, and despite your probable lie that you are a programmer when you stated it, you have nothing, not even 1 thing that was noted as good in this science, where apk had 10 of them). You can't even match the 'modded up' posts count he had and you are a registered user. Lord knows the "elitists" amongst the registered users here often avoid ac posts (like apk does) and certainly for modding them upwards. You should be able to blow his mod up posts count away, however as usual, you have no proof of your doing better. Typical troll is what you are and not even good at that just judging by the counts of errors you have made here on things technical in this discussion.
It sure showed us how much trolling and messing up on technical issues that ion.simon.c makes here though. Hilarious amusement, thanks apk.
How apk uses P.B. Shelley's quoted excerpt fits here quite nicely. You looked upon his works and must despair, hahaha, because you have zero to compare to his rather large list of accomplishments around this science, despite you saying you have used computers since the late 1980's. I hate to point out the obvious ion.simon.c, but you have not accomplished much, otherwise you would have put up proofs of your status allegedly as a programmer in this science since you stated you are. I don't believe it because you make too many technical mistakes and I read them when apk noted them. If you are a coder then you must stink at it. You ion.simon.c claimed to be a programmer and then you asked for proof of apk's status in the science of computing. He put up so many proofs this way in the way of verifiable achievements in this science that I found it impressive in fact, especially considering he blows away anything to that effect (proving his status as a pro in this science) you had, which was, laughingly, nothing on your part ion.simon.c, so give up. You trolled and were destroyed here for it by your own stupidity and numerous errors which apk also documented and I read them. I believe you are a professional in this field as much as anyone might believe I am Barack Obama. You're nothing but a stupid troll ion.simon.c, face it.
Alongside the article over at windows it pro forums called the memory optimization hoax and there apk stated the same as he has here and dr. russinovich never replied otherwise as to apk and he doing work for the same companies in the 1990s and that apk helped him find and fix problems in his pagedefrag program. That's official enough for me and please don't try to cover for your own inadequacy in computer sciences saying that's insufficient. What IS insufficient is your lack of proof you are a programmer since you ask proof of others of their roles in this science as you had to apk and he blew you away with his proofs and amount of it as well as achievements he has to his credit where you laughingly have zero to compare, let alone prove your bullshit that you are a programmer. If you are a programmer then I am Barack Obama. Give up ion.simon.c you inadequate jealous troll.
HOSTS files are used in security, as is the other point apk covered on wfp versus how older windows did a 3 part phalanx zone defense like arrangement for securing ip traffic. It is on topic, because this is about windows and security and hosts files plus filtering are portions of microsoft windows' own security system. You stated you are a programmer in this posting and it is clear you are not and just some lying amateur, because when you asked apk to prove he is a pro in this science he did so with numerous examples and accomplishments in this science. You by the same token had nothing like them. apk more than answered your questions where you said "windows has nothing like selinux" and apk pointed out acl's and how they have been in NT\2000\XP\Server 2003 since their conception unlike Linux using kernel hooking seLinux. apk was completely correct and so much so you had to try the 'troll tactic' of saying "that is insufficient" and the article goes into it more in depth as to how kernel hooking works and proved selinux does as apk said it does, uses kernel hooks to achieve what Nt-based OS' always have had natively. Go away you jealous little nobody troll ion.simon.c, you have lost badly.
He certainly shut you up about how selinux implements things like windows access control lists in mandatory access control and also that selinux uses kernel hooks which you doubted and he produced a stack trace debug dump of selinux from microsoft themselves to prove it. You tried to say "that is insufficient" only because it blew away your trolling garbage and once I read that article I actually learned a thing or two, so thanks apk. Ion.simon.c, thanks for the amusement and showing us all you are a victim of your own hubris and that you stuck your foot in your mouth a dozen times and are now off topic trolling to try to bury the evidences of your mistakes here through this posting. I read the list of errors you made here that apk put up and you are one stupid sob who claims he is a programmer (prove it, apk did, and you can't) and is clearly not.
The word MOAR doesn't exist in the english language moron. You ran out of things to say after you were caught in a dozen errors in this thread ion.simon.c and all you have is off topic evasions and attempts at burying evidences of you being in error so many times in this post that it is not even amusing anymore. You say you are a programmer. Prove it. At least apk had some evidences to that much and his accomplishments, which you have none of given that you can't produce a list of evidences like his. He did more a decade ago up to recently than you have in this science in your entire time in it. Prove otherwise.
If anyone here is tired, it is us reading your repeated mistakes and off topic posts in this thread, ion.simon.c. So, ion.simon.c, You claim to be a programmer. Prove it. That's what you said to apk and he blew you away with a lot of evidence to that effect as to his professional status in this science and his accomplishments in it, as well as he showing you in error here a dozen times or more by now on technical issues being discussed. Give up, you lost badly, ion.simon.c, and it is obvious you are just trying to troll him now. I will say one thing in your defense: You are so stupid that it is hilarious watching you try to save face and cover your mistakes by trying to bury apk's replies, but as you can see, I can see and have read them also and man, did you ever lose and badly.
I read apk's reply and he more than answered your questions, and provided a link that actually even proves what he stated that selinux uses kernel hooking to achieve what it does on Linux, and that windows nt family of operating systems has had something like that natively already built in since day 1 in acl's. Quit trolling ion.simon.c, because you have lost miserably and make a dozen or more mistakes here and they were documented in apk's answers here which made me laugh at how badly you have done in this exchange, error after error on your end. You call yourself a programmer? You have no proof of it, where apk does, and provided it at your request. You then laughingly try to lessen what he has accomplished, because you have nothing like it. You are a jealous troll that messes up on technr ical points here as well. Grow up, accept that you lost, and move on troll. I know you are full of it and you're no longer even amusing.
I've read the article over at windows it pro magazine since I am a subscribing member there and Jeremy Reimer, Jarrett DeAngelis, and Jay Little impersonated apk on Reimer's website and admitted to it (only after their isp's busted them for email harassing apk, and then Reimer's hosting provider for his website removed parts of Reimer's website for libelling apk as well as threatening his family like a psyhopath would which got canadian law enforcement involved (and reimer backed off fast at that point and had to or go to court and jail)). It is therefore quite obvious that moron Reimer did the same over at arstechnica, the home of the trolling loser online.
You must realize that you do not speak for everyone here you dyslexic mental defective. It's no one's fault your dull and damaged brain is adversely affected by your natural stupidity and defective brain, and that you need 1st grade remedial reading level retraining for reading properly on your part. You obviously also lack technical prowess and proficiency in this field and on this topic because of your stupid reply here to which I am responding to. Why don't you try to contribute meaningful data on the topic at hand instead, you off topic anonymous luser post? You can't because you're stupid and you know it. All you have is your garbage off topic replies.
http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1213751&cid=27749811
Why don't you try him directly on any points he made, because I have watched the AC apk trash many an ambiguous idiot like yourself here many times the past 5 years now. I think you don't dare hit on any of the points he made specifically, like by quoting them, because you do not possess the knowledge in computers to attempt to do so primarily, but also that you know you'll get shredded if you try it. The best you have was the crap about being drunk, but personally I think you're nothing and were rightfully told to phuk off here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1213751&cid=27749317 as you were. I hope you grow some testicles and try mess with him on any of his points via quotes and I will watch him rip you in half as he usually does versus you incompetent "I will respond with slurs and general garbage instead of specifics, because you are clearly of that type of incompetent ilk.
I haven't had to look into how to do so in Vista yet.
by mjm1231 (751545) Alter Relationship on Thursday April 23, @03:28PM (#27692705) I know that replacing the SAM file under %windir%\system32\config with a SAM that has no password assigned is a way to blow by the password security in Windows NT variants. SysInternals NT locksmith (or their graphical bootup recovery disk) pretty much do the same thing but make it simpler in that you don't need a bootable Linux or DOS Operating System to do it from (which also means they would need an ntfs filesystem read/write capable driver also in order to do so). Hope I am correct on this, as it has been years since I read of and tried some of these things.