You are an idiot if you can't see that there is real danger of such a thing. While I don't think he can make a successful attempt at it, if you doubt for a minute that Trump has all the makings of another Hitler and would love to go that route if he could figure out a way to do it then you haven't been paying attention
You don't seem to understand that the two situations are radically different. This is about the *government* and making sure it cannot infring upon free speech. The first amendment is about limiting the *government* from interference. Facebook is a private entity and is well within the law having entered a conctrual agreement with the user that they may do so via those terms of service to which you referred.
I was able to pick it up just fine. Of course I am smart enough to know that when you learn a complex piece of software you don't just open it, point and click and hope for the best. You read the fucking documentation, and at least one quality book that gets into how the UI works *and* the underlying principles that are needed to be able to fully grasp the design and understand the decisions made by the team to do it that way.
Believing as you do that software that is more than moderately complicated can quickly learned, with or without putting in the proper time and effort using all the proper resources
There is no "blame", and I said the distribution is responsible for out of box configuration, not the user. Given that you were unable to read and understand that simple statement it is no wonder that you can't deal with basic configuration documentation and set up your system properly.
That's a configuration issue and your complaint about it's default configuration rests with your distro, not the GIMP team. Any complaint about how it is set up on your system today rest solely on your shoulders, since you choose to complain about how it is configured rather than configure it the way you prefer.
Being evidently unable to learn and use a UI is your real problem. There is nothing at all wrong with their UI since they implemented the single window option.
It's GIMP, and is an acronym for the for the GNU Image Manipulation Program. You sound like an idiot when your big complaint is the name of the program is an issue of some kind. Next you'll be saying Firefox suggests animal cruelty and Microsoft reminds you too much of your dick.
Nice anecdote. The fact remains that on Slashdot there is no need to define APT in computer security story summary since it is by no means a new term and has appeared on Slashdot hundreds of times, just as there no need is to define CPU in a hardware story. If you haven't heard of it because you missed all those earlier stories for some reason then you google it, rather than polluting the comment section with complaints that you are both ignorant (of the term) and too lazy to type it into your search box.
There are so many idiots on Slashdot these days... It's like you are part of some kind of #MeToo movement, but for idiots instead of woman who have been assaulted.
Yeah. I've seen all kinds of cases of bank apps being exploited. Oh wait... I still have never seen any reports of this happening. I think you mean "even though Android is quite secure and stable and most banks have Android apps that are secure I hate Google so I'm going to pretend that bank accounts are being compromised left and right even though that assertion is ridiculous, since if that were the case banks would be pulling their apps left, right, up and down."
The end user negotiates terms by agreeing or disagreeing to use the service. The idea that each user of Facebook, Twitter, Tinder and all the rest should be able to have a customized TOS is an idea one would only have if they had no idea what the phrase "it doesn't scale" means.
Where did you get the idea that there is conservation of opportunity built into the system? Maybe you meant "while many will be denied an opportunity a few will gain one"?
I'm not sure what bizarre world you live in, but everywhere I have lived the number of appropriate weight people far outweighs the clearly out of shape ones. I think you have been reading too many magazine articles and failing to observe the people around you.
That's not how it works. The "victim" contests the negative report and it is then up to the credit reporter to prove their negative report is legit. In fact many people with legitimate credit issues get their records cleared this way since the reporting party often doesn't respond in time.
That's a very solid argument. There are no morons who deserve to be dressed down on Slashdot. There is only one asshole on the whole site. Even if I was stupid enough to believe that, you are already an asshole, so by logical inference I'm in the clear. But let's face it... You post as AC yet follow up regularly, which is the trademark of the troll. IOW you are a stupid asshole who logs in to an account then clicks "Post as AC" every time you reply to me because you know if you didn't your Karma would be in the toilet, yet I am somehow Slashdot's biggest asshole, but have maxed out Karma minus a point or two here and there before bouncing back. It seems the mods like Slashdot's biggest asshole. I wonder why you don't? Oh, that's right, because you are one of the many trolls who regularly get treated like an asshole by me, because... wait for it... You are a moron with Dunning Kruger syndrome, an asshole, and a troll.
Actually I treat people the way they deserve to be treated. Most people I meet like me to a degree that surprises me at times in fact. There are so many people like yourself on Slashdot these days that your confusion is understandable though.
Slashdot Mirror
Living up to your SlashID I see. The definition of a troll is not "someone who disagrees with you and expresses it."
You are an idiot if you can't see that there is real danger of such a thing. While I don't think he can make a successful attempt at it, if you doubt for a minute that Trump has all the makings of another Hitler and would love to go that route if he could figure out a way to do it then you haven't been paying attention
You don't seem to understand that the two situations are radically different. This is about the *government* and making sure it cannot infring upon free speech. The first amendment is about limiting the *government* from interference. Facebook is a private entity and is well within the law having entered a conctrual agreement with the user that they may do so via those terms of service to which you referred.
I'm not sure where you got the idea that Linux isn't an RTOS, but it can absolutely be an RTOS.
Really? A systemd troll in 2019? You suck at trolling.
I was able to pick it up just fine. Of course I am smart enough to know that when you learn a complex piece of software you don't just open it, point and click and hope for the best. You read the fucking documentation, and at least one quality book that gets into how the UI works *and* the underlying principles that are needed to be able to fully grasp the design and understand the decisions made by the team to do it that way.
Believing as you do that software that is more than moderately complicated can quickly learned, with or without putting in the proper time and effort using all the proper resources
There is no "blame", and I said the distribution is responsible for out of box configuration, not the user. Given that you were unable to read and understand that simple statement it is no wonder that you can't deal with basic configuration documentation and set up your system properly.
Yes, they should absolutely rename it because your boss is incompetent.
You could suck less, but if you do make sure to find an alternative source of protein!
That's a configuration issue and your complaint about it's default configuration rests with your distro, not the GIMP team. Any complaint about how it is set up on your system today rest solely on your shoulders, since you choose to complain about how it is configured rather than configure it the way you prefer.
Being evidently unable to learn and use a UI is your real problem. There is nothing at all wrong with their UI since they implemented the single window option.
It's GIMP, and is an acronym for the for the GNU Image Manipulation Program. You sound like an idiot when your big complaint is the name of the program is an issue of some kind. Next you'll be saying Firefox suggests animal cruelty and Microsoft reminds you too much of your dick.
Nice anecdote. The fact remains that on Slashdot there is no need to define APT in computer security story summary since it is by no means a new term and has appeared on Slashdot hundreds of times, just as there no need is to define CPU in a hardware story. If you haven't heard of it because you missed all those earlier stories for some reason then you google it, rather than polluting the comment section with complaints that you are both ignorant (of the term) and too lazy to type it into your search box.
It's s term people who actually belong on Slashdot understand because when it first started appearing here years ago we knew how to google it.
There are so many idiots on Slashdot these days ... It's like you are part of some kind of #MeToo movement, but for idiots instead of woman who have been assaulted.
I smoke. As Andrew Dice Clay pointed out, if second hand smoke is worse than "first hand" smoke, I made the right choice then didn't I?
Cool story bro.
So you are guessing that my data isn't falsely weighted to create the appearance that you are correct? I concede that is true.
Yeah. I've seen all kinds of cases of bank apps being exploited. Oh wait ... I still have never seen any reports of this happening. I think you mean "even though Android is quite secure and stable and most banks have Android apps that are secure I hate Google so I'm going to pretend that bank accounts are being compromised left and right even though that assertion is ridiculous, since if that were the case banks would be pulling their apps left, right, up and down."
The end user negotiates terms by agreeing or disagreeing to use the service. The idea that each user of Facebook, Twitter, Tinder and all the rest should be able to have a customized TOS is an idea one would only have if they had no idea what the phrase "it doesn't scale" means.
Where did you get the idea that there is conservation of opportunity built into the system? Maybe you meant "while many will be denied an opportunity a few will gain one"?
I'm not sure what bizarre world you live in, but everywhere I have lived the number of appropriate weight people far outweighs the clearly out of shape ones. I think you have been reading too many magazine articles and failing to observe the people around you.
That's not how it works. The "victim" contests the negative report and it is then up to the credit reporter to prove their negative report is legit. In fact many people with legitimate credit issues get their records cleared this way since the reporting party often doesn't respond in time.
That's a very solid argument. There are no morons who deserve to be dressed down on Slashdot. There is only one asshole on the whole site. Even if I was stupid enough to believe that, you are already an asshole, so by logical inference I'm in the clear. But let's face it ... You post as AC yet follow up regularly, which is the trademark of the troll. IOW you are a stupid asshole who logs in to an account then clicks "Post as AC" every time you reply to me because you know if you didn't your Karma would be in the toilet, yet I am somehow Slashdot's biggest asshole, but have maxed out Karma minus a point or two here and there before bouncing back. It seems the mods like Slashdot's biggest asshole. I wonder why you don't? Oh, that's right, because you are one of the many trolls who regularly get treated like an asshole by me, because ... wait for it ... You are a moron with Dunning Kruger syndrome, an asshole, and a troll.
Actually I treat people the way they deserve to be treated. Most people I meet like me to a degree that surprises me at times in fact. There are so many people like yourself on Slashdot these days that your confusion is understandable though.