Yes, Congress can pass laws to fix judicial fuck-ups; and especially the constituion can be ammended. No prominent examples come to mind, but then IANAL.
An attempt to rewrite the constiution like France does would be doomed to fail before it began; not the reason why, but oh noes1! lawyers would have to learn something new.
Free as in unallocated or available, not free as in beer; which the "copious" modifier works better with.
Yes, it has been linked to other issues besides esoteric and/or relatively curable cancers, but that still is not enough to suggest that it is a worthwhile place to assign scarce resources... be that as a requirement or a recommendation for others to consider in allocation of their own.
No, I want a cost-benefit analysis of sinking copious free health resources into the profits of a company that appears to be making a mountain out of a mole hill (low mortality cancer, low-effectiveness/variant-coverage vaccine) versus other matters like accessible dental care, produce subsidies what have you....
The Wyden campaign was the one that started the dirty ads. As for representing "actual human beings", well, thanks so much for the kind words. He doesn't represent me very well. Does that make me not a human in your opinion?
Don't be obtuse, he was clearly referring to natural persons vs legal persons... or wait, is that (obfuscant) you Wehrhauser?
Sorry, at the time of reading there were over a thousand comments and feedly was having issues scrolling through them.
The commerce department is not named in the constitution, but the (in)famous commerce clause does specify a right to regulate interstate commerce, which would naturally be done with some sort of agency or department.
As another commenter has pointed out, NOAA appears to be the majority of the Dept. of Commerce budget (in non-census years)---5.5 of 9 billion... less than half of what it was two years ago--so keeping the agency but killing the parent is doubly pointless.
NOAA (incl. NWS) is Dept of Commerce, one of the agencies on this jackhole's hit list, despite the constitution's explicit granting of powers to regulate commerce to the feds.
Not really. If you are speaking of Firefox, that requires you to effectively close and reopen the browser. Multifox allows you to have separate simultaneous windows run under the same instance of the binary with different sets of cookies.
No, "water" is not, even assuming its "pure." What hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratios? What temperature and pressure? 1 gm/ml is an approximation, water's density is typically a little less than one in everyday conditions.
Also look into O'Reilly's "Cooking for Geeks," especially if it's a matter of culinary accumen. There are also some good shows that can give you ideas: America's Test Kitchen, Good Eats, Iron Chef America, and Chopped. The last two in particular, whille emphasizing creativity, are also about *speed* and taste.
Why is it necessarily about money? If the hardware works, why should it be scrapped prematurely? Do these $20 video cards you speak of get fabricated at no cost to the environment and have huge energy savings over the older "underpowered" options?
Maybe you should try installing better software? Firefox or Dolphin, and Hacker's Keyboard to start.
And why the fuck do you want to install an app for every magazine or website you read? Feedly's a nice skin on to of Google Reader.
As for video there's Flash, so you can get everything but hulu; because they cleverly decided to tackle support for 3 inch screens on an older platform rather than 7 or 10 inch tablets.
Untrue, it just has to be to a creative end. http://projectrepat.org/ went through Kickstarter and it is a non-profit; I suppose you could think of it as wholly owned commercial sub-division,but it is not officially incorporated that way as far as I know. What do they care what you use your "profits" for?
Actually, you may not have to. Sales tax is collected at point of sale, use tax on income tax forms, and at least in MA there's an exemption for the first $2.5k (or so) purchased.
It does seem a pathetically low yield. Why rice, and not bacteria like insulin?
TFA doesn't say, and the linked DOI does not exist.
Yes, Congress can pass laws to fix judicial fuck-ups; and especially the constituion can be ammended.
No prominent examples come to mind, but then IANAL.
An attempt to rewrite the constiution like France does would be doomed to fail before it began;
not the reason why, but oh noes1! lawyers would have to learn something new.
Free as in unallocated or available, not free as in beer; which the "copious" modifier works better with.
Yes, it has been linked to other issues besides esoteric and/or relatively curable cancers,
but that still is not enough to suggest that it is a worthwhile place to assign scarce resources...
be that as a requirement or a recommendation for others to consider in allocation of their own.
No, I want a cost-benefit analysis of sinking copious free health resources into the profits of a company that
appears to be making a mountain out of a mole hill (low mortality cancer, low-effectiveness/variant-coverage
vaccine) versus other matters like accessible dental care, produce subsidies what have you....
This is about all I can find.
The Wyden campaign was the one that started the dirty ads. As for representing "actual human beings", well, thanks so much for the kind words. He doesn't represent me very well. Does that make me not a human in your opinion?
Don't be obtuse, he was clearly referring to natural persons vs legal persons...
or wait, is that (obfuscant) you Wehrhauser?
Sorry, at the time of reading there were over a thousand comments and feedly was having issues scrolling through them.
The commerce department is not named in the constitution, but the (in)famous commerce clause does specify a right to regulate interstate commerce, which would naturally be done with some sort of agency or department.
As another commenter has pointed out, NOAA appears to be the majority of the Dept. of Commerce budget (in non-census years)---5.5 of 9 billion... less than half of what it was two years ago--so keeping the agency but killing the parent is doubly pointless.
NOAA (incl. NWS) is Dept of Commerce, one of the agencies on this jackhole's hit list,
despite the constitution's explicit granting of powers to regulate commerce to the feds.
Not really. If you are speaking of Firefox, that requires you to effectively close and reopen the browser.
Multifox allows you to have separate simultaneous windows run under the same instance of the binary
with different sets of cookies.
In MA at least, it's asked for onthe income tax form, but you get to ignore it unless you buy a shitload of stuff online.
Multifox lets you keep multiple windows with different sets of cookies open in FF.
Except that they already have, sort of, they call it a constant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_constant>
Salt water does not boil at 100 Fahrenheit at any normal pressure.
BP of fresh/sweet water is 212, salt increases that (Raoult's Law).
Beyond redefinition of the meter, a matter-based unit of mass is
sensitive to the isotope ratio of the matter used e.g; deuterated (heavy) water
No, "water" is not, even assuming its "pure." What hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratios?
What temperature and pressure? 1 gm/ml is an approximation, water's density is typically
a little less than one in everyday conditions.
Farady forever!
(a Faraday is the charge of a mol of electrons, or 96,485.30899 Coulombs)
Also look into O'Reilly's "Cooking for Geeks," especially if it's a matter of culinary accumen.
There are also some good shows that can give you ideas: America's Test Kitchen, Good Eats,
Iron Chef America, and Chopped. The last two in particular, whille emphasizing creativity,
are also about *speed* and taste.
You call it a tonne, or you convert to Imperial, or you call it a long ton, or you ignore the ~10% difference;
in order of decreasing accuracy.
He's suggesting such guidelines should not exist in the first place.
It's not about the shredding, but sorting the materials....
and hopefully refrigerant recovery, but that was not addressed.
Not as good as "The sheep look up," but apropos.
Yes, it does. He explained the original notion of trading houses, not the current system. See "History of Money."
Try this then: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersymmetry
Why is it necessarily about money? If the hardware works, why should it be scrapped prematurely?
Do these $20 video cards you speak of get fabricated at no cost to the environment and have huge
energy savings over the older "underpowered" options?
Maybe you should try installing better software? Firefox or Dolphin, and Hacker's Keyboard to start.
And why the fuck do you want to install an app for every magazine or website you read?
Feedly's a nice skin on to of Google Reader.
As for video there's Flash, so you can get everything but hulu; because they cleverly decided to tackle
support for 3 inch screens on an older platform rather than 7 or 10 inch tablets.
A happy Galaxy 10.1 user
Untrue, it just has to be to a creative end. http://projectrepat.org/ went through Kickstarter and it is a non-profit;
I suppose you could think of it as wholly owned commercial sub-division,but it is not officially incorporated that
way as far as I know. What do they care what you use your "profits" for?
Actually, you may not have to. Sales tax is collected at point of sale,
use tax on income tax forms, and at least in MA there's an exemption
for the first $2.5k (or so) purchased.