Trying to innovate necessarily implies failing a lot. The Kin failed, but at least they tried something different. Windows Phone 7 is different too. Will it fail? Maybe. We'll see.
It's like health insurance, not car insurance. In the context of health insurance, when a problem arises, it might not be too late to save what is at stake, and if you're not insured, then you can still pay the full bill (what this guy or his neighbor offered to do). In the context of car insurance, the damage is done and cannot be prevented anymore.
Why would this be a municipal thing? This is about business and people not paying their bills (for the delivered service). So, they could take his house from him, not in the least because it *would still be there.*
The 75 USD is basically an insurance fee. If you don't pay the fee, then you should have to pay the full cost of the service... to put the fire out. Which is what this guy (or his neighbor) offered to do.
He (or his neighbor) was prepared to pay the full cost of putting the fire out, which one assumes would be less than the cost of rebuilding the house. What they did was immoral and stupid. Would they let somebody burn to death because of a minor mistake (not paying 75 USD)? I guess that in the world of the slashdotters who modded the parent insightful, they would.
Your analogy with car insurance is flawed. This is how it should go: when you have a wreck and you're not assured, you pay the full cost. Similarly, when your house is burning and you haven't paid your fee, then you pay to full cost of putting out the fire, not the full cost of the house. The owner did offer to pay this cost. Besides, I wonder, what would they have done if there were somebody inside?
Are you ready to put your money where your mouth is? I set up a Windows server and you have 24 hours to remotely root it. If you succeed, I give you 1000 USD. If not, you give me 1000 USD.
Are you ready to put your money where your mouth is? I set up a Windows machine. You have 24 hours to remotely root it. If you succeed, I give you 1000 USD, if not you give me 1000 USD. Deal?
Right. And how many basic car/smart phone/TV/micro wave/... models do we need? I'd say that it's great that we have all these different versions, even if they seem to differ only in some details. Indeed, some of these details might turn out to be much more important than our current understanding dictates.
I don't have an iPhone, but doesn't it use USB or WiFi to connect to the iTunes host? In that case, the malware can change the USB/WiFi protocol stack to protect itself from updates.
All I have to do is to press this button right here, and the '10 best gapes ever' app will simultaneously launch on millions of iPhones. It will be a sweet day indeed.
Slashdot Mirror
You really want your kids to end up on Slashdot?
Trying to innovate necessarily implies failing a lot. The Kin failed, but at least they tried something different. Windows Phone 7 is different too. Will it fail? Maybe. We'll see.
Comparable things happen in ER.
It's like health insurance, not car insurance. In the context of health insurance, when a problem arises, it might not be too late to save what is at stake, and if you're not insured, then you can still pay the full bill (what this guy or his neighbor offered to do). In the context of car insurance, the damage is done and cannot be prevented anymore.
Why would this be a municipal thing? This is about business and people not paying their bills (for the delivered service). So, they could take his house from him, not in the least because it *would still be there.*
Ever heard of the concept of a 'business', 'detailed invoice', etc ?
How do you know that they would have saved human life?
People could pay (cost + some profit) whenever there is a fire to put out. The thing would operate as a business, with some capital to invest upfront.
The 75 USD is basically an insurance fee. If you don't pay the fee, then you should have to pay the full cost of the service... to put the fire out. Which is what this guy (or his neighbor) offered to do.
Of course, that's what a free market is all about. I can't believe some of the comments I'm seeing here on slashdot. Anal is just too gentle a word.
He (or his neighbor) was prepared to pay the full cost of putting the fire out, which one assumes would be less than the cost of rebuilding the house. What they did was immoral and stupid. Would they let somebody burn to death because of a minor mistake (not paying 75 USD)? I guess that in the world of the slashdotters who modded the parent insightful, they would.
Your analogy with car insurance is flawed. This is how it should go: when you have a wreck and you're not assured, you pay the full cost. Similarly, when your house is burning and you haven't paid your fee, then you pay to full cost of putting out the fire, not the full cost of the house. The owner did offer to pay this cost. Besides, I wonder, what would they have done if there were somebody inside?
I also have a message, for the W3C: FUCK YOU
If they cannot keep up with the real world (and they cannot, as proven time after time after time), then that's their problem.
I would be a default Windows Server 2008 installation with all updates installed. Interested?
Is that a refusal?
I would deploy the server (default installation & updates) on AWS. Deal?
Are you ready to put your money where your mouth is? I set up a Windows server and you have 24 hours to remotely root it. If you succeed, I give you 1000 USD. If not, you give me 1000 USD.
Are you ready to put your money where your mouth is? I set up a Windows machine. You have 24 hours to remotely root it. If you succeed, I give you 1000 USD, if not you give me 1000 USD. Deal?
They will need a big jail.
Right. And how many basic car/smart phone/TV/micro wave/... models do we need? I'd say that it's great that we have all these different versions, even if they seem to differ only in some details. Indeed, some of these details might turn out to be much more important than our current understanding dictates.
What do you mean, non-automated testing?
+1 for writing MS as M$. I thought that meme had died out.
I don't have an iPhone, but doesn't it use USB or WiFi to connect to the iTunes host? In that case, the malware can change the USB/WiFi protocol stack to protect itself from updates.
As root, why wouldn't I be able to mess with the update process?
All I have to do is to press this button right here, and the '10 best gapes ever' app will simultaneously launch on millions of iPhones. It will be a sweet day indeed.