GIMP is a wonderful tool, that has almost nothing to do with Web design. That is, Web design is the part with layout and tags, and styles. The issue with the 'sins' site is not with the tools, it's with the concept.
And if you don't want to pay Apple or Google for such 'services', you can stick to the traditional model where one can choose among hundreds of phone models and use them with several providers. Just like we have several big photo camera manufacturers, and a few more independent lens manufacturers.
A phone is just a phone and we don't need it to become another computer platform to be monopolized. Stop selling me services, please, I only need a phone (that is, hardware).
As TFA mentions, "the book will be sold through the xkcd Web site". And it probably does not need to go to the common book stores, because most of the times only the fans understand what is a comic about.
Consider also that Wiki pages are mainly intended to be updated. You should decide if your users should be able to modify the content they are viewing or not. If yes, make sure they can modify only the local content and not the content borrowed from Wikipedia.
Of course, they should be able to make a dime by selling online or CD via stores. If they are not after the x5 dimes they can get from concerts, why not. The point is not to forbid the selling, but to make it a niche market what it deserves to be.
There are people (many of them in./) who think that the prices required by record companies are ridiculously high. The same people think that most of the profit of records sold goes to the record companies and not to the artists. And these people don't want to buy albums and prefer to go to live concerts. I don't see what's wrong with that.
There are many ways to profit by creating art without involving yourself in the public performance. If you only want to create art (e.g. music) and not perform it, you can get other artists to perform instead of you on tours and get your share from the profits. Or you can sell your artwork to other performers. Of course, you should not expect your profits to be the same since part of the profits should go to the performers.
There is something more. A lot of people like the live performances because they are unique, both for the performer and the audience. There is no comparison between listening your portable player or hifi system at home, and the experience you get together with a few thousand people during a live performance. There is no comparison in the audio quality, especially when it comes to classical performed in concert halls. Before the creation of the phonograph, the live performance had been the only way the author's music can reach the audience.
So if you just want to record, that's fine, only don't expect to get the same share of profit, popularity, or whatever you want in return of creating art.
The more users you have, the higher the chance that some of them will want to spare a few dollars to make the game more funny them.
I was surprised that the article didn't mention the largest 'free-to-pay' game, Maple Story. It is played by more than 50 million players all over the world. And the developers get hundreds of millions every year, yes, from micro transactions.
Money, get away
Get a good job with more pay and your O.K.
Money it's a gas
Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash
New car, caviar, four star daydream,
Think I'll buy me a football team
Money get back
I'm all right Jack keep your hands off my stack.
Money it's a hit
Don't give me that do goody good bullshit
I'm in the hi-fidelity first class traveling set
And I think I need a Lear jet
Money it's a crime
Share it fairly but don't take a slice of my pie
Money so they say
Is the root of all evil today
But if you ask for a rise it's no surprise that they're
giving none away
Isn't this exactly the same as the matrix metering introduced in SLR cameras in the eighties? Just instead of calculating recommended exposure you get an estimation.
The principle should be similar - get several thousands of really good pictures that anybody likes. The more, the better. Run analysis for patterns and store the results in a database. And when you need to evaluate a picture, just search for available patterns.
Getting power from a desert to where it is needed, and buying all that land in a desert. I'm not saying SSP is remotely close to being cost effective yet, but there's simply more to crunching the numbers than you think there is.
Do you mean that hydroelectric plants are usually close to power consumers? Or that it is easy and cheap to build hydroelectric dams?
Slashdot Mirror
GIMP is a wonderful tool, that has almost nothing to do with Web design. That is, Web design is the part with layout and tags, and styles. The issue with the 'sins' site is not with the tools, it's with the concept.
OTOH, the 'sins' article discussed here is just bad when talking about usability. The content and purpose is not better, unfortunately.
Guys at FSF, if you want your message to reach the public, take some web design lessons. For example, take a look at your friends at Mozilla.
A phone is just a phone and we don't need it to become another computer platform to be monopolized. Stop selling me services, please, I only need a phone (that is, hardware).
Is there a chance that the bees need a drink rich in electrolytes?
From TFA: The title text will appear where the tiny copyright notice would appear on a traditional strip.
Still, great news! May the force be with Randall.
Consider also that Wiki pages are mainly intended to be updated. You should decide if your users should be able to modify the content they are viewing or not. If yes, make sure they can modify only the local content and not the content borrowed from Wikipedia.
Beliefs
And fortunately, they still make Portra.
Of course, they should be able to make a dime by selling online or CD via stores. If they are not after the x5 dimes they can get from concerts, why not. The point is not to forbid the selling, but to make it a niche market what it deserves to be.
There are people (many of them in ./) who think that the prices required by record companies are ridiculously high. The same people think that most of the profit of records sold goes to the record companies and not to the artists. And these people don't want to buy albums and prefer to go to live concerts. I don't see what's wrong with that.
There is something more. A lot of people like the live performances because they are unique, both for the performer and the audience. There is no comparison between listening your portable player or hifi system at home, and the experience you get together with a few thousand people during a live performance. There is no comparison in the audio quality, especially when it comes to classical performed in concert halls. Before the creation of the phonograph, the live performance had been the only way the author's music can reach the audience.
So if you just want to record, that's fine, only don't expect to get the same share of profit, popularity, or whatever you want in return of creating art.
I was surprised that the article didn't mention the largest 'free-to-pay' game, Maple Story. It is played by more than 50 million players all over the world. And the developers get hundreds of millions every year, yes, from micro transactions.
Money / Pink Floyd
Money, get away
Get a good job with more pay and your O.K.
Money it's a gas
Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash
New car, caviar, four star daydream,
Think I'll buy me a football team
Money get back
I'm all right Jack keep your hands off my stack.
Money it's a hit
Don't give me that do goody good bullshit
I'm in the hi-fidelity first class traveling set
And I think I need a Lear jet
Money it's a crime
Share it fairly but don't take a slice of my pie
Money so they say
Is the root of all evil today
But if you ask for a rise it's no surprise that they're
giving none away
Everybody who plays (free)Civilization knows that switching to monotheism from polytheism is a good thing.
Isn't this exactly the same as the matrix metering introduced in SLR cameras in the eighties? Just instead of calculating recommended exposure you get an estimation.
The principle should be similar - get several thousands of really good pictures that anybody likes. The more, the better. Run analysis for patterns and store the results in a database. And when you need to evaluate a picture, just search for available patterns.
Getting power from a desert to where it is needed, and buying all that land in a desert. I'm not saying SSP is remotely close to being cost effective yet, but there's simply more to crunching the numbers than you think there is.
Do you mean that hydroelectric plants are usually close to power consumers? Or that it is easy and cheap to build hydroelectric dams?