But he's asking that we delete public history which is absurd. If the courts wanted it sealed they had that option. Part of his sentence was his conviction be public for all to see forever. I'd have a little more sympathy if this crime happened 30 years ago before the internet, but this is 10 years ago, anyone that committed a crime then should expect they could be on the internet as a criminal.
And what about mistakes and fake news. The procedure to be forgotten should much easier, for anyone.
If Google fight in a court of law each time someone wants to be forgotten, and, say, they lose 50% of the lawsuits, the bill is going to be expensive...
That's why the question "Do we trust the legal system?". If we do, the guy is supposed to serve due time proportional to his crime, enough to discourage him to commit another perjury.
Google has been pushing https a lot already, for a few years, and cookies exchanged over an https site are secure. Websites using http to send/set/read session (...) cookies deserve to be hacked.
That's not the point. Serial rapist are (hoepfully) an exception. It became so easy to know anything about anyone, everyone should have the right to opt out. Simple as that.
The guy committed a crime. He served time, repaid his debt to society. Shouldn't he have, then, the right not to be marked as a criminal forever, in front of the world eyes?
Means you don't even need an amp. Switch the thing on and voilà, the 20 kilos diamond needle heavily presses the record surface allowing the release of a loud sound.
Slashdot Mirror
Not long before a bunch of extensions are released to automatically save a copy of all these "self destructive" emails...
But he's asking that we delete public history which is absurd. If the courts wanted it sealed they had that option. Part of his sentence was his conviction be public for all to see forever. I'd have a little more sympathy if this crime happened 30 years ago before the internet, but this is 10 years ago, anyone that committed a crime then should expect they could be on the internet as a criminal.
And what about mistakes and fake news. The procedure to be forgotten should much easier, for anyone.
execute this search on Bing"
Bing bashing. Again!
If Google fight in a court of law each time someone wants to be forgotten, and, say, they lose 50% of the lawsuits, the bill is going to be expensive...
That's why the question "Do we trust the legal system?". If we do, the guy is supposed to serve due time proportional to his crime, enough to discourage him to commit another perjury.
and for starters, replace DNS servers 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 with 1.1.1.1 / 1.0.0.1 ...
Google has been pushing https a lot already, for a few years, and cookies exchanged over an https site are secure. Websites using http to send/set/read session (...) cookies deserve to be hacked.
That's not the point. Serial rapist are (hoepfully) an exception. It became so easy to know anything about anyone, everyone should have the right to opt out. Simple as that.
Google doesn't know what it needs to purge
Google doesn't have to know. Everyone should be entitled no to be searchable from a search engine.
Maybe Orwell wanted to be forgotten, also.
The guy committed a crime. He served time, repaid his debt to society. Shouldn't he have, then, the right not to be marked as a criminal forever, in front of the world eyes?
And yet, at a time when servers get hacked all the time, stealing some private keys and that's it...
We're talking about India, not Texas.
Means you don't even need an amp. Switch the thing on and voilà, the 20 kilos diamond needle heavily presses the record surface allowing the release of a loud sound.
>> If you want your computer to be really secure, disconnect its power cable
...and run it on batteries.
Is there something similar for iOS? (it seems iOS became less accurate since v11, due probably to a new algorithm)
France is the land of cultural protectionism
FTFY
https://www.theverge.com/2018/...
opp't'ni's
using your real name
I thought that's mandatory on the Internet, like on /.
"We do, while you are taking a video, record that and use that to make the service better by making sure that you have audio. That is pretty clear"
Not clear at all.
"compile the source code and run the app" is where we know the article was written by a non-programmer.
grep -r search *
They can't.
We'll see if members of the House and Senate committees are truly honest.