Slashdot Mirror


User: Cold+hard+reality

Cold+hard+reality's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
117
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 117

  1. Re:Men on the moon on White House Panel Considers New Paths To Space · · Score: 1

    In a Hollywood sf movie you get 90 minutes of special effects. In a NASA moon mission you get several years of boredom followed by someone stepping out into a landscape that's by now familiar and uttering some canned line.

    It's exciting, but how much advertising space on a spacesuit can you sell?

  2. Re:Men on the moon on White House Panel Considers New Paths To Space · · Score: 1

    We look at this, and we see that it is horribly expensive, dangerous, and with very little practical return.

    And don't tell me that it's our only chance to survive if earth is destroyed. First of all, it won't be us who survive, it would be _them_, and I care about my own skin first. Second, a few months after earth is gone, so would be any moon colony. You can't live off the land there.

  3. Re:Bottem up? on DIY Biologists To Open Source Research · · Score: 1

    So are the graveyards of history.

  4. Re:first on The Truth Behind the Death of Linux On the Netbook · · Score: 0, Redundant

    first idiot.

  5. Re:Freedom for Iraq! on The State of Iran's Ongoing Netwar · · Score: 1

    The ten commandments were 1500 years old in AD 30.

  6. Re:The problem with linear extrapolation on Real Nanotechnology Getting Closer, Says Drexler · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly, you've yet to fathom the mysteries of log-scale plots.

  7. Re:"controlled nuclear explosion" on Vicariously Tour the National Ignition Facility · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because it's controlled.

  8. Re:That's retarded on Protecting the Apollo Landing Sites From Later Landings · · Score: 1

    The lander remained on the moon. The crew returned via its upper stage (using the lander as a launching pad). The footprint might still be there.

  9. Re:Is it just me? on Google Unveils Search Options and Google Squared · · Score: 0

    Yes, it's just you. No, it does not.

  10. Re:It's also good for practical jokes on Ultra-Dense Deuterium Produced · · Score: 1

    Hopefully not a black one.

  11. Re:That's "dilithium" on Ultra-Dense Deuterium Produced · · Score: 1

    If someone has you believe that the human body is anything less than incredibly sophisticated, they're not a scientist. You're probably thinking of science fiction authors.

  12. Re:Like batting orders on New Pattern Found In Prime Numbers · · Score: 1

    Okay, if you have a random number along the interval (1,10^X), all the leading digits will be equally likely.

    No. In the interval [1, 100], 12 numbers start with 1. The digits 2..9 lead 11 times each. 0 never shows up.

  13. You're confusing things on Oracle Buy Renews Call To Spin Off OpenOffice.org · · Score: 1

    Buying StarDivision: $1700 per employee (once, plus paying the employees)
    Buying StarOffice: $50 per employee (say, yearly)

    Even if Sun fired all the employees of StarDivision, they would have seen return on investment starting on the 34th year. That is *not* a good deal.

    All of your post is about how StarOffice is better than Office (which may be true or not), whereas the deal should be measured by checking if StarDivision is better than StarOffice.

  14. Bad deal then on Oracle Buy Renews Call To Spin Off OpenOffice.org · · Score: 2, Insightful

    $73 million / 42000 employees = $1700 per employee. Would have been cheaper to buy 42000 StarOffice licenses for $2.1 million.

  15. Re:Human exploration IS worthwhile IF... on Telepresence — Our Best Bet For Exploring Space · · Score: 1

    1. We don't know how to make spaceships that last hundreds of years.

    2. We don't know how to communicate over such long distances.

    3. Current technology may take us to a star, but forget about making orbit or manuvering.

    4. While long-term projects are feasible, hundreds of years is pushing it.

  16. Re:Latency on Telepresence — Our Best Bet For Exploring Space · · Score: 1

    Every single human female capable of bearing a child residing off earth represents a small victory.

    No, it represents billions in liabilities to keep that human female alive.

    I was addressing the survival of the human species.

    You only think you were. If earth goes, every off-planet colony goes, unless they're self-supporting (which we have no idea how to do).

    We have the ABILITY to put dozens of people on the moon today.

    In twenty years, maybe. But not keep them there.

  17. Re:Ignores time dilation on Telepresence — Our Best Bet For Exploring Space · · Score: 1

    10gs are survivable by a human in very good condition, for a few minutes. Don't try to get up while you're doing it.