Slashdot Mirror


User: jacquesm

jacquesm's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,635
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,635

  1. Re:Positive thing on Anonymous Anger Rampant On the Web · · Score: 1

    he's a poet, it makes perfect sense (that it's nonsense).

  2. Re:Define "Winning" on Discuss the US Presidential Election & the War · · Score: 1

    tell that to the mercenary-formerly-known as 'Prince'.

  3. Re:Define "Winning" on Discuss the US Presidential Election & the War · · Score: 1

    the fact that a company is publically traded does not mean that a majority of the shares is in the hands of the public, that only happens when more than 50 % of the stock is 'floated'.

  4. Re:Define "Winning" on Discuss the US Presidential Election & the War · · Score: 1

    Not sure if mods are still reading this article, but in case you do please mod parent up, that's exactly where it's at.

  5. Re:Define "Winning" on Discuss the US Presidential Election & the War · · Score: 1

    Hussein probably killed less iraqis than Americans did, and that includes the people murdered in the Iran Iraq war (when he was still on 'our' side).

  6. Re:Define "Winning" on Discuss the US Presidential Election & the War · · Score: 5, Insightful

    war tends to destroy stuff - infrastructure, materiel and people - in vast quantities, money gets moved from the tax payers to the producers of these war toys in equally vast quantities, they are *not* going to use it to improve the state of affairs in the country that does the spending. Most of it will end up in numbered accounts in .ch.

    Spending an extra 10 billion every month on education or infrastructural improvements *is* going to put that money back in to circulation.

  7. Re:Define "Winning" on Discuss the US Presidential Election & the War · · Score: 5, Insightful

    oh, don't worry about it, the people lining their pockets with war profits are winning just fine. Four more years of it and they'll be home free. Never mind the effect on the rest of America (or the world for that matter).

    Catch-22 was *much* too friendly in it's spoof on war profiteering. Reality is so much harsher.

    I always figured that there never was an all-out effort to catch OBL simply because if it were succesful then there would be no more need to continue all these crazy expenses.

    Speaking of expenses, simply shutting down this crazy war will give Obama more money than he could hope to raise through taxation, if all the money destroyed in Iraq would have been used for good the USA would be in a completely different position right now.

  8. Re:First of many, methinks on UK Court Rejects Encryption Key Disclosure Defense · · Score: 1

    seconded.

    Really that piece of tripe is one reason why I think /. may have to rethink the 'we don't edit the discussion' rule. Enough stuff like that and people will just leave.

  9. Re:What is a code of conduct for? on Microsoft's Ethical Guidelines · · Score: 1

    not sure if I'd prefer him to be shafted or sacked... maybe both ?

  10. Re:A string of meaningless words!! on Microsoft's Ethical Guidelines · · Score: 1

    that'd be one very bad vector for an attack.

  11. Re:Microsoft is just misunderstood. on Microsoft's Ethical Guidelines · · Score: 2, Funny

    now who names their file '; delete from files ;

    ?

  12. Re:All your base are belong to us... on Microsoft's Ethical Guidelines · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    asshole.

  13. Re:How many admins? on Wikimedia Simplifies By Moving To Ubuntu · · Score: 1

    That's exactly how I configure clusters (only then I only have the one image for everything, not several specialized ones).

    It works like a charm and the best bit is if a machine dies you just replace it or let it sit there.

    Shared storage is a bit of an issue with such a setup, look at glusterfs if this stuff interests you.

  14. Re:Not so. on Wikimedia Simplifies By Moving To Ubuntu · · Score: 1

    this one. I fell for it too a couple of days ago. Quite easy to fix too... wonder why nobody cares.

  15. Re:What a letdown on Google's GeoEye-1 Takes Its First Pictures · · Score: 1

    just one word: wow

  16. Re:Be careful... on Hackers Clone Elvis' Passport · · Score: 1

    Well, if you forbid your populace to visit a certain island but at the same time you annex a part of it and commit all kinds of crimes there (I hope we can at least agree on that) then I think it raises hypocrisy to a new level.

    Guantanamo bay is a blot on American history and it will take generations before it will be erased.

  17. Re:Obligatory on Hackers Clone Elvis' Passport · · Score: 1

    No, sorry it wasn't. This was using the 'new' and improved submission form.

  18. Re:Obligatory on Hackers Clone Elvis' Passport · · Score: 1

    I noticed... :)

    I also noticed that the dunce that wrote the code to take the content of this box can't program.

    It can't be too hard to parse those brackets...

    it was supposed to be:

    #include <rick-n-roll.h>

  19. Re:Be careful... on Hackers Clone Elvis' Passport · · Score: 1

    America also doesn't own a piece of Cuba, it's leased, and the lease is disputed.

  20. Re:Obligatory on Hackers Clone Elvis' Passport · · Score: 1

    after the above comment I believe that should be:

    #include

  21. Re:Being special on Do We Live In a Giant Cosmic Bubble? · · Score: 1, Insightful

    hehe, Insightful ? Hilarious, I think mods are confused today, THHGTTG is definitely *not* a textbook on cosmology.

  22. Re:Being special on Do We Live In a Giant Cosmic Bubble? · · Score: 0

    > I've been chewing on this concept for years:

    I'm sure that makes it more likely to be true.

    Look, not to burst your bubble, I don't care if you came up with it one fine sunday morning or if you really spent years 'developing this theory' (shades of dr. Stranglove there) but it sounds like nonsense to me.

  23. Re:The anthropic cop-out on Do We Live In a Giant Cosmic Bubble? · · Score: 0

    someone has been writing too much code lately :)

    'new' ??

  24. Re:Being special on Do We Live In a Giant Cosmic Bubble? · · Score: 0

    for some reason there seems to be a historical error that we have made over and over and again, which is to consider our position somehow 'special'.

    Time and again further information has shown these assumptions to be wrong. I would expect this to fail in much the same way, it simply would be too much of a coincidence.

  25. Re:Connecting ideas on Do We Live In a Giant Cosmic Bubble? · · Score: 1

    Imagine this bathtub, see, made of ebony...