Okay, so you agree that there's no _native_ replication support. It's Java, it's not native.
I think the query planner and the connection queue will give a database a much better idea of what needs to be cached, the OS will simply never be able to understand the database's needs at teh same level.
Could this mean that Microsoft are, at long long last, taking security seriously? Windows "worm" traffic has now become the norm, not the exception, on our networks. I'm still seeing "code red" traffic some two years after the intense publicity.If this is serious, let's applaud Microsoft for once.
Customers with contracts should obtain upgraded software free of charge through their regular update channels. For most customers, this means that upgrades should be obtained through the Software Center on the Cisco worldwide website at http://www.cisco.com/tacpage/sw-center/sw-ios.shtm l.
Customers whose Cisco products are provided or maintained through prior or existing agreement with third-party support organizations such as Cisco Partners, authorized resellers, or service providers should contact that support organization for assistance with obtaining the free software upgrade(s).
Customers who purchase direct from Cisco but who do not hold a Cisco service contract and customers who purchase through third-party vendors but are unsuccessful at obtaining fixed software through their point of sale should get their upgrades by contacting the Cisco Technical Assistance Center (TAC). TAC contacts are as follows.
+1 800 553 2447 (toll free from within North America)
+1 408 526 7209 (toll call from anywhere in the world)
e-mail: tac@cisco.com"
So, if I understand this correctly, if you've given Cisco money for hardware _and_ given Cisco money for a support contract, only then can you get hold of the fix. Neat.
The RIAA may well have overstated the facts but piracy _is_ piracy. Making a single backup for personal use is one thing, condoning mass duplication is another. I personally have in my possesion exactly zero copyrighted works that I have not legitimately purchased. The sooner we can all claim this, the sooner our arguments against such travestys such as the DMCA will be strengthened.
Well, it goes a little further. So online radio stations must pay royalties, who next? What about hospital radio stations, should they have to pay too?
Slashdot Mirror
"Windows XP Box" By Andy France - Posted on 1 December 2003
;)
Slashdot: Always first with the news
> it's far more important than a low
:)
> Slashdot UID, which I also have,
> as you can see
That makes me much cooler than you, then
(Yes, offtopic away...)
Where does this story fit into either of the requisite categorys "new for nerds" and, indeed, "stuff that matter"?
Another relase from the RDMS that told us transactions weren't important and would just slow things down.
They are making vague indications that they might do what Debian have been doing for just a little while now?
Okay, so you agree that there's no _native_ replication support. It's Java, it's not native.
I think the query planner and the connection queue will give a database a much better idea of what needs to be cached, the OS will simply never be able to understand the database's needs at teh same level.
Errm, have you seen what's involved in actually _using_ this replication system?
And actually, I'd rather have the database decide what gets cached and what doesn't.
Errm, have you seen what's involved in actually _using_ this replication system?
....still no native replication. MySQL has this one single advantage over Postgres.
Oh, raw disk use would be nice too.
The mother has a point, just because she's too stupid to understand basic copyright law, it doesn't mean her child should be punished.
> But it is also true that wast majority of Oracle installations are poorely implemented (due to enourmous and unjustyfiable complexity),
Does your spellchecker run on Oracle, too?
...on what Transmeta is doing apres Linus.
I believe Linus is still retained by Transmeta, he's just being given a free arm as to what he wants to do: i.e. hack the kernel.
Harbouring criminals is worthy of respect?
No, I didn't understand it correctly.
But it will make getting a fix for Cisco kit of unknown provenance a bit trickier.
"Obtaining Fixed Software
m l.
Customers with contracts should obtain upgraded software free of charge through their regular update channels. For most customers, this means that upgrades should be obtained through the Software Center on the Cisco worldwide website at http://www.cisco.com/tacpage/sw-center/sw-ios.sht
Customers whose Cisco products are provided or maintained through prior or existing agreement with third-party support organizations such as Cisco Partners, authorized resellers, or service providers should contact that support organization for assistance with obtaining the free software upgrade(s).
Customers who purchase direct from Cisco but who do not hold a Cisco service contract and customers who purchase through third-party vendors but are unsuccessful at obtaining fixed software through their point of sale should get their upgrades by contacting the Cisco Technical Assistance Center (TAC). TAC contacts are as follows.
+1 800 553 2447 (toll free from within North America)
+1 408 526 7209 (toll call from anywhere in the world)
e-mail: tac@cisco.com"
So, if I understand this correctly, if you've given Cisco money for hardware _and_ given Cisco money for a support contract, only then can you get hold of the fix. Neat.
...of US corporate stupidity being allowed to prevail over common sense.
If it's sur-par quality, _don't buy it_.
Stealing overpriced, sub-par quality works, is _still_ theft.
I personally have in my possesion exactly zero copyrighted works that I have not legitimately purchased. The sooner we can all claim this, the sooner our arguments against such travestys such as the DMCA will be strengthened.
Wrong. In most cases, you pay for the right to use the binary.
Well, it goes a little further. So online radio stations must pay royalties, who next? What about hospital radio stations, should they have to pay too?
A CNN story and a Slashdot article about 39 words of vapid marketspeak from some random Microsoft employee.