But would they really want to get rid of what I would imagine to be one of their biggest sources of revenue?
Just using the numbers and the method you provided as an example[ $(35((n^2+n)/2))) for n domain names], someone would have to buy 44-45 domain names to bring in the revenue that one squater would bring in for buying 1,000 domain names at $35 each
"The domain registrar for FreeLegoPorn.com, GoDaddy.com, eventually shut down the site and transferred the domain name to Lego under ICANN rules."
So if a domain name uses a trademarked name in an 'offensive' manner, it's perfectly fine to strip ownership of the domain from the person who registered it and then give it to the company whose name was used?
-
Similar situation from 2003:
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/04/nyregion/04AMBE.html
There are a few domain names I wanted that the damn domain name resellers beat me to, all I need to do is trademark a name that is a slight misspelling of the name and it's all mine!
-
Don't ruin my plan with your silly logic.
You know that part in Alien when the alien emerges from the guy's stomach? Well, we all know that kangaroos keep their young in pouches near the stomach.
Coincidence? I think not.
GOVERNMENT WARNING: (1) According to the Surgeon general, women should not drink from the fountain of youth during pregnancy because of the risk of birth defects.
Watch out celebrities, the internet wants you dead.
Unless the internet doesn't want to give cloud computing proponents another arguing point.
So, what'll it be?
Slashdot Mirror
But would they really want to get rid of what I would imagine to be one of their biggest sources of revenue? Just using the numbers and the method you provided as an example[ $(35((n^2+n)/2))) for n domain names], someone would have to buy 44-45 domain names to bring in the revenue that one squater would bring in for buying 1,000 domain names at $35 each
"The domain registrar for FreeLegoPorn.com, GoDaddy.com, eventually shut down the site and transferred the domain name to Lego under ICANN rules." So if a domain name uses a trademarked name in an 'offensive' manner, it's perfectly fine to strip ownership of the domain from the person who registered it and then give it to the company whose name was used? - Similar situation from 2003: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/04/nyregion/04AMBE.html There are a few domain names I wanted that the damn domain name resellers beat me to, all I need to do is trademark a name that is a slight misspelling of the name and it's all mine! - Don't ruin my plan with your silly logic.
You know that part in Alien when the alien emerges from the guy's stomach? Well, we all know that kangaroos keep their young in pouches near the stomach. Coincidence? I think not.
They're trying to prove that it can fly at night using the energy it stored during the day. Would kinda defeat the whole purpose, wouldn't it?
Reminds me of the Helios project back in 2001. http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap010831.html
I doubt she'd be able to give consent. They wouldn't be a child molester, just a run-of-the-mill rapist.
GOVERNMENT WARNING: (1) According to the Surgeon general, women should not drink from the fountain of youth during pregnancy because of the risk of birth defects.
Watch out celebrities, the internet wants you dead. Unless the internet doesn't want to give cloud computing proponents another arguing point. So, what'll it be?
My parents check my undies every day before I go to work. Just like all good parents should!