Could you tell me where I might get one of those? See, I was thinking about including Cthulhu in my D&D campaign and I figured 3d1000 psychic damage upon witnessing his greatness would be reasonable.
One pass, haul ass, do it RIGHT the first time (a) works, (b) explains the Swiss attitude to quality.
Right, like how the LHC turned out. Oh wait, that was the Americans' fault; teaching our 'dirty tricks' to Europeans. Look, when you mess up, 'fess up. Don't pass the buck across the ocean.
I also like your 'rational assessments.' Bigoted ethnocentric moron.
If human life must always prevail over free speech, then the many who have died to protect it have done so in vain. I'm not usually utilitarian, but I concede that some must be lost for the protection of a principle which serves to shield mankind from tyranny and oppression.
I wonder what the opinion is of the man in question; would he willingly give his life for the principle? If not, then I admit I am conflicted, for it is a separate thing entirely to demand another to die for principles not his own.
Slashdot Mirror
Then, suppose I roll a 1000 sided die...
Could you tell me where I might get one of those? See, I was thinking about including Cthulhu in my D&D campaign and I figured 3d1000 psychic damage upon witnessing his greatness would be reasonable.
One pass, haul ass, do it RIGHT the first time (a) works, (b) explains the Swiss attitude to quality.
Right, like how the LHC turned out. Oh wait, that was the Americans' fault; teaching our 'dirty tricks' to Europeans. Look, when you mess up, 'fess up. Don't pass the buck across the ocean. I also like your 'rational assessments.' Bigoted ethnocentric moron.
If human life must always prevail over free speech, then the many who have died to protect it have done so in vain. I'm not usually utilitarian, but I concede that some must be lost for the protection of a principle which serves to shield mankind from tyranny and oppression. I wonder what the opinion is of the man in question; would he willingly give his life for the principle? If not, then I admit I am conflicted, for it is a separate thing entirely to demand another to die for principles not his own.