Btw Erdoan lives in his brand new palace at Atatürk Orman Çiftlii, Cumhurbakanl Külliyesi, Betepe, Ankara, Türkiye. He doesn't live at the leaked address. See also: https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/...kanl_Saray_(Türkiye)
They would probably need to build an abstraction layer on top of MySQL. Something like "FBSQL":) . This would create the ability to move to whatever database system they want.
I was trying to explain that website owners can comply with the law by taking down copyrighted material if copyrighted material resides on their website. Anyway, torrent-finder was taken down by the ICE. However, the website does not contain copyrighted material. Is an iframe to isohunt considered as copyright infringement?
The Internet has had a great effect on society by boosting innovation and the economy. I'm worried about blocking domains because this can certainly be misused. Suppose that a powerful organization lobbies the DoJ to block the next Google because is 'against their' policy or because 'they have a patent on it' .
Murder is an obvious crime. The people operating these websites did not commit crimes. For example, torrent-finder was taken down by the ICE and this website is not even close to criminal. It is metasearch engine. The DoJ is probably getting lobbied by the MPAA.
Are you telling me that you are perfectly fine with a government that blocks domains because they do not *like* it? What's next?
- Block a domain because it has offended the president
- Block a domain because they are 'against us'
- Block a domain because of activists
I really am against the policy of the DoJ. They are policing the Internet and are ignoring fundamental values that have made the Internet a great place.
By default the MS PPTP client supports VPN chaining. The last VPN hop would send unencrypted data (comparable to a Tor exit node) which is afaik unavoidable.
There are programming methods that aim to decrease the amount of bugs substantially with functional testing and unit testing. Unfortunately these tests don't make software 100% bug-free but it they do reveal 'big bugs'.
Slashdot Mirror
Btw Erdoan lives in his brand new palace at Atatürk Orman Çiftlii, Cumhurbakanl Külliyesi, Betepe, Ankara, Türkiye. He doesn't live at the leaked address. See also: https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/...kanl_Saray_(Türkiye)
It's a database which dates back to 2010. It only includes citizens which were >= 18 years old back then.
Prox Network is pretty good.
One does not simply get a Master's degree for $100.
How can forcefully seizing a domain name, which is not criminal in any way, not be a violation of freedom of speech.
Some moderators are too strict. No wonder wikipedia is losing contributors.
They would probably need to build an abstraction layer on top of MySQL. Something like "FBSQL" :) . This would create the ability to move to whatever database system they want.
Why isn't there a backup available in case a glitch occurs?
I was trying to explain that website owners can comply with the law by taking down copyrighted material if copyrighted material resides on their website. Anyway, torrent-finder was taken down by the ICE. However, the website does not contain copyrighted material. Is an iframe to isohunt considered as copyright infringement?
The Internet has had a great effect on society by boosting innovation and the economy. I'm worried about blocking domains because this can certainly be misused. Suppose that a powerful organization lobbies the DoJ to block the next Google because is 'against their' policy or because 'they have a patent on it' .
Copyrighted material can be taken down by the owners of the websites according to the DMCA. There is no need to block domains, it is plain wrong.
Murder is an obvious crime. The people operating these websites did not commit crimes. For example, torrent-finder was taken down by the ICE and this website is not even close to criminal. It is metasearch engine. The DoJ is probably getting lobbied by the MPAA.
This is plain old censorship so suppress people and misuse of power
Are you telling me that you are perfectly fine with a government that blocks domains because they do not *like* it? What's next?
- Block a domain because it has offended the president
- Block a domain because they are 'against us'
- Block a domain because of activists
and the list goes on...
I really am against the policy of the DoJ. They are policing the Internet and are ignoring fundamental values that have made the Internet a great place.
Yes some even do that *double facepalm*... obviously not mine in this specific case but someone else's.
By default the MS PPTP client supports VPN chaining. The last VPN hop would send unencrypted data (comparable to a Tor exit node) which is afaik unavoidable.
What about a free/paid VPN connection?
Microsoft copies Google and they copy Facebook :)
It's on the BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8603938.stm
It's gone viral.. they can't take it down
This is really disturbing..
There are programming methods that aim to decrease the amount of bugs substantially with functional testing and unit testing. Unfortunately these tests don't make software 100% bug-free but it they do reveal 'big bugs'.
Dude, I definitely should have posted that anonymously :)
ÖÖ×YÉZ-¥z3”àÃ'uF3ÅhB0ÊÓg=xïÓ>JåXZ=G –ëÇxúãÃr6GÎ*DÜ–íB’zÄ; ã£)¥Rihttô£/^|ñZ~ýú'333ONNNV*#Æyÿ®$|PÍã¼à¼Ç{ÉÔ'ó€ð^p^eýÓz(DÑ;_ec}z£á^~ýåóçÏÿõðáÿ¾}û/€€uË—/ÿfANX]Áe±sÁ9OêïïADe2F@ÖôéÏÎ7X.3X.±“'O]¼xñ×ù|¾|óæÍ?©ááá–––>+JûRò!w-S)¼Á[ÀdQ:A¼Â9p|PAÀ7ÂóïèûÅÅ&&&>N:Ý yób%Dp`cÑ”|ÀÆVB Iq ©ÔWbòGG;OLL|h+Jg€ááï£seØ\–ZBÑ_%4COCBò–iÆt%`e``j{5Aùò+hQ,r2â'$xQV×_Lïúo