Obviously those should be "said" and "believed" since he is dead. But the point stands, he was not an agnostic. That's post hoc bullshit made up by right-wingers to distance McVeigh from Christianity by lying about his beliefs.
MCVEIGH: I was raised Catholic. I was confirmed Catholic (received the sacrament of confirmation). Through my military years, I sort of lost touch with the religion. I never really picked it up, however I do maintain core beliefs.
TIME: Do you believe in God?
MCVEIGH: I do believe in a God, yes. But that's as far as I want to discuss. If I get too detailed on some things that are personal like that, it gives people an easier way alienate themselves from me and that's all they are looking for now.
So he's an agnostic but clearly says he believes in God?
So "getting a clue" is cherry picking the low number out of the two that your source cites to win the argument? Why should I trust that the lower number is the accurate one when I've seen more estimates that are closer to the higher number.
No, it simply means they used the wrong means to get a positive end. No different than cops planting evidence and beating a suspect to catch the real criminal in a case.
But they are "just doing their job", too, so there should be zero complaints on the part of the governmental shills. Though it's delightfully amusing to hear this excuse used when the US specifically decried this as not a defense during the Nuremberg Trials.
He does offer an incentive. Either work until you're dead tired or you're fired. And that partnered with the collusive hiring practices that go on in Silicon Valley (and you'd be naive to think only Apple, Google and Intel are the only ones doing this rather than just being the only ones caught doing it) you'll likely be facing a hard time getting another job.
Because other companies will follow suit if Facebook is successful in this tactic. You're extremely naive to think that this will only ever happen at Facebook, etc.
Being familiar with them is not the same as "to know all about China's and Russia's intelligence". He does not claim what you claim he does. Also, posting as AC is pretty lame cold fjord. It's not like we don't know it's you.
That's not the same as claiming that "he claims to know all about China's and Russia's intelligence". He was saying that they didn't get the documents from him since he didn't have them after turning them over.
Which parts of the US constitution has the NSA broken? What would the NSA reply if they were confronted with these claims? Cynicism aside, why are the responsible parties at the NSA not prosecuted for breaking the law?
I can only hope this is supposed to be a parody post. Otherwise one can only assume you're being intentionally dense and naïve.
But there doesn't need to be proof. Simply making assertions that they do is enough to get the character assassination of the whistleblower under way. And the good "patriots" like cold fjord will eat it up without ever asking for any real evidence to back up the claims.
And how large are those "body counts"? Are we to ignore that more people in the US die from falling in their homes than have been killed by terrorists? Just so you know, 21000 adults died in 2010 of unintentional falls. That's 7 times the amount of people who died in 9/11. Sorry, but the "dirty Mooslems" hiding behind every corner trying to "kill us for our freedoms" just don't rate as much of a threat.
Rite Aid isn't a person. Two, weak troll is weak.
Obviously those should be "said" and "believed" since he is dead. But the point stands, he was not an agnostic. That's post hoc bullshit made up by right-wingers to distance McVeigh from Christianity by lying about his beliefs.
Tim McVeigh self-identified as an agnostic.
Nope that's total bullshit.
TIME: Are you religious?
MCVEIGH: I was raised Catholic. I was confirmed Catholic (received the sacrament of confirmation). Through my military years, I sort of lost touch with the religion. I never really picked it up, however I do maintain core beliefs.
TIME: Do you believe in God?
MCVEIGH: I do believe in a God, yes. But that's as far as I want to discuss. If I get too detailed on some things that are personal like that, it gives people an easier way alienate themselves from me and that's all they are looking for now.
So he's an agnostic but clearly says he believes in God?
So "getting a clue" is cherry picking the low number out of the two that your source cites to win the argument? Why should I trust that the lower number is the accurate one when I've seen more estimates that are closer to the higher number.
No, it simply means they used the wrong means to get a positive end. No different than cops planting evidence and beating a suspect to catch the real criminal in a case.
Which is why they hide it behind saying the person doesn't "fit the culture".
But they are "just doing their job", too, so there should be zero complaints on the part of the governmental shills. Though it's delightfully amusing to hear this excuse used when the US specifically decried this as not a defense during the Nuremberg Trials.
Might = won't.
So you have no problems with China and Russia tapping your phones and stealing data from your computers?
There are far more Muslims in the US than there is in France. So you might mind all your calls being tapped by foreign intelligence agencies, right?
You want a project done fast, offer incentive...
He does offer an incentive. Either work until you're dead tired or you're fired. And that partnered with the collusive hiring practices that go on in Silicon Valley (and you'd be naive to think only Apple, Google and Intel are the only ones doing this rather than just being the only ones caught doing it) you'll likely be facing a hard time getting another job.
Because other companies will follow suit if Facebook is successful in this tactic. You're extremely naive to think that this will only ever happen at Facebook, etc.
So were personal computers in 1980s.
They were? So that's how normal office secretaries were using them just fine?
Then move to Somalia and stop trying to turn this country into it.
Being familiar with them is not the same as "to know all about China's and Russia's intelligence". He does not claim what you claim he does. Also, posting as AC is pretty lame cold fjord. It's not like we don't know it's you.
You need to read that again, and then I think you have a choice to make.
I don't need to read anything again. What you claimed he said is not what he said. You're just spreading more baseless FUD like in the last article.
That's not the same as claiming that "he claims to know all about China's and Russia's intelligence". He was saying that they didn't get the documents from him since he didn't have them after turning them over.
Ubuntu uses upstart not systemd. Did you not even read the summary?
There must be. Because I don't see the threat in the imaginary boogeyman and piss myself like you seem to.
The only thing Nokia changed was adding an LGPL option. It was already dual licensed under the GPL.
Which parts of the US constitution has the NSA broken? What would the NSA reply if they were confronted with these claims? Cynicism aside, why are the responsible parties at the NSA not prosecuted for breaking the law?
I can only hope this is supposed to be a parody post. Otherwise one can only assume you're being intentionally dense and naïve.
So there's no proof but yet you keep spreading the claim as if it were true. Almost as if your whole point was the spread FUD instead of truth.
Why would they need to read it in the newspaper when they could just as easily break into the system steal the first-hand data for themselves.
But there doesn't need to be proof. Simply making assertions that they do is enough to get the character assassination of the whistleblower under way. And the good "patriots" like cold fjord will eat it up without ever asking for any real evidence to back up the claims.
And how large are those "body counts"? Are we to ignore that more people in the US die from falling in their homes than have been killed by terrorists? Just so you know, 21000 adults died in 2010 of unintentional falls. That's 7 times the amount of people who died in 9/11. Sorry, but the "dirty Mooslems" hiding behind every corner trying to "kill us for our freedoms" just don't rate as much of a threat.