Slashdot Mirror


CryptoSeal Shuts Down Consumer VPN Service To Avoid Fighting NSA

sl4shd0rk writes "CryptoSeal Privacy, a VPN provider, has closed down its consumer VPN service. The company says it has zeroed its crypto keys, adding, 'Essentially, the service was created and operated under a certain understanding of current U.S. law, and that understanding may not currently be valid. As we are a US company and comply fully with U.S. law, but wish to protect the privacy of our users, it is impossible for us to continue offering the CryptoSeal Privacy consumer VPN product.' The announcement ends with a warning: 'For anyone operating a VPN, mail, or other communications provider in the U.S., we believe it would be prudent to evaluate whether a pen register order could be used to compel you to divulge SSL keys protecting message contents, and if so, to take appropriate action.' Sounds like another victim of FISA-endorsed NSA activity."

361 comments

  1. This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentlemanly by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in the old spy days, the gentlemanly thing to do was crack the other guy's encryption, NOT beat his keys out of him. This is just cheating, pure and simple.

    --
    Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
  2. Time to start by ugen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sounds like it's high time time to start a VPN provider in SeaLand (or what do we have left that's not firmly in jurisdiction of governments with grubby hands and long noses)?

    1. Re:Time to start by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sounds like it's high time time to start a VPN provider in SeaLand (or what do we have left that's not firmly in jurisdiction of governments with grubby hands and long noses)?

      Perhaps your solution lies on a "pirate" data boat on the high seas?

      --
      Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    2. Re: Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't necessarily need ones without grubby hands; you just need a couple jurisdictions that are relatively uncooperative with one another. China will sell you out but probably won't respect US NSLs. So some subcontractor will have to bribe them. Suddenly it gets expensive to see your ciphertext where TA then determines it's likely just a loveletter.

    3. Re:Time to start by dmbasso · · Score: 4, Funny

      Will you let the Seamen manage your VPN? Be careful of backdoors!

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    4. Re:Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You ain't going to do anything. Just shut the fuck up and go back to dreaming about doing something in the face of tyranny.

    5. Re: Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Looks like Brazil is growing a pair.

    6. Re:Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or get a VPN provider started on Native Reserve.

    7. Re:Time to start by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sounds like it's high time time to start a VPN provider in SeaLand

      This, though maybe not in SeaLand.

      The first country that offers verifiably secure email and VPN services to the world will enjoy an economic boom and the love of billions. And if it's a country like Iceland, it could go a long way toward making them wealthy. And if the US decides to invade Iceland, then at least the gloves can come off and the world can declare the United States a rogue state. But I don't see that happening, because at some point, if the rest of the world really starts to turn sour on the US, you'll start to see things change over here. But as long as we have to cover of the EU and Asia as our allies, the US spymasters can pretend that all is well. But with every week there's a new revelation about a president of a free country having their email hacked by the NSA, maybe we're closer to a worldwide shunning than we think.

      I'd gladly pay for secure email that I knew was beyond the reach of the upskirting creeps in the NSA. And I would love to be able to pay a place like Iceland, Finland, etc for that privilege.

      No one who values freedom, economic, social or just the freedom to not be watched, should be quiet about this. Me, I've become a one-issue voter thanks to the revelations about what the NSA is up to. Any legislator who voted against reining in those bastards is now on my list to support any opponent who will vote to put a stop to ubiquitous surveillance in the US.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:Time to start by icebike · · Score: 2

      I'd gladly pay for secure email that I knew was beyond the reach of the upskirting creeps in the NSA.

      Would you?

      How much would you pay? It seems the going price is around $10/Month.

      http://gizmodo.com/why-kolab-might-be-the-best-secure-email-service-still-1171618005

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    9. Re:Time to start by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What the hell? Why would I trust ANY country, or for that matter ANY third party with my encryption codes? I generate them myself, keep them to myself and never disclose them to the government or to any business.

    10. Re:Time to start by viperidaenz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The first country that offers verifiably secure email and VPN services to the world will enjoy an economic boom and the love of hundreds, maybe thousands.

      FTFY, because billions of people just don't really care that much to do anything about it.

    11. Re:Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pimpy

    12. Re:Time to start by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      An email system requires the recipient to be able to read the email. That requires them having a valid key. The simple way is to have each user have a key to give secure communications with the email provider, who decodes the messages then recodes them with the recipients codes for delivery. And that makes a single point of failure, the email provider has all the codes.

    13. Re:Time to start by chihowa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're going to move yourself and your contacts to a system incompatible with plain old email, why not just start using GPG (or even S/MIME)? Why choose a "solution" where you have no choice but to trust a third party (who you've never even met, in a foreign country, with opaque practices and facilities)?

      With GPG, nobody but you and your contact can decrypt the messages. If you add in a third party, they can now decrypt the messages too. You're adding points of failure this way, not making fewer of them! Why on earth would you even trust the provider? Why would you choose a system where you have to?

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    14. Re:Time to start by chihowa · · Score: 1

      The first country that offers verifiably secure email and VPN services to the world will enjoy an economic boom and the love of billions. And if it's a country like Iceland, it could go a long way toward making them wealthy. And if the US decides to invade Iceland, then at least the gloves can come off and the world can declare the United States a rogue state. But I don't see that happening, because at some point, if the rest of the world really starts to turn sour on the US, you'll start to see things change over here. But as long as we have to cover of the EU and Asia as our allies, the US spymasters can pretend that all is well. But with every week there's a new revelation about a president of a free country having their email hacked by the NSA, maybe we're closer to a worldwide shunning than we think.

      There's no such thing as "verifiably secure". One of the key elements in good security is minimizing the number of people you need to trust (and being able to thoroughly vet the people that you have no choice but to trust). Why would you trust an operation in Iceland, owned and run by people you don't know, shrouded behind the typical corporate veil, housed in locked facilities that you can't visit, and run on code you can't audit (or be certain that the available code what is actually running)? You have no reason to trust these strangers and the system you design for yourself shouldn't need you to.

      They could be a great operation or they could be an NSA front. Why gamble with that chance, when it's not necessary to?

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    15. Re:Time to start by kenshin33 · · Score: 1

      not even you can decrypt the message once encrypted with the other person's public key. The only key capable of that is the private key of the recepiant.

    16. Re: Time to start by Entropius · · Score: 1

      They don't like either US snooping or Chinese snooping or Russian snooping, but they might do their own if you do something they don't like.

      GP's suggestion of trusting in the mutual antipathy of major world powers seems like a good one.

    17. Re:Time to start by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 1

      You know, I was wondering the very thing the other day (not coincidentally while re-reading the Cryptonomicon... but why hasn't anyone stepped up and tried creating a data-haven? It's been theorized about for years (I remember reading about it back in the '80s, I think in Bruce Sterling's Islands In the Net) so it's not as if people haven't been aware of its necessity for decades. You would think /somebody/ would have made a serious attempt by this point, even prior to the Snowden revelations.

      I mean, sure, you see websites all the time that promise to archive your data for you... but those are always encumbered by hundred-page legalese that essentially say "if They come knocking, we're buckling". Has there ever been a serious attempt to create an internet haven where not only did the provider promise security but ensured it in such a way that even if the government did make such demands, the data would be unrecoverable unless the User provided the key? I know there has never been a government that has ever made a promise to honor the security of a citizen's data...

      As said, a country that made such a promise (and backed it up with verifiable security) would probably make a mint these days. It almost makes one believe in tinfoil-hat conspiracy theories that this market has been so long ignored.

    18. Re:Time to start by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 1

      But - assuming it could be proven (as much as it can ever be proven) secure - corporations would love it. Including banks.

      So would terrorists, criminals and drug dealers, of course. But that's blaming the tool for the faults of its users. Regardless, a lot of people with a lot of money would see serious advantage to such a thing. Given this, it is surprising it doesn't exist.

      It's unfortunate it would primarily be of interest mostly to the unscrupulous at first, but that might be what it takes to get such a thing available to the common internet user.

    19. Re:Time to start by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      That's why I always encrypt to myself as well as the recipient. It's not difficult.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    20. Re:Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My semen manages just fine without no stinkin' V-Peen..

    21. Re:Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do I know the public key is authentic? Maybe it was spoofed by the NSA.

    22. Re:Time to start by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Why would banks care? They already give anyone with a warrant what ever information is requested. They already use SSL/TLS to secure their internet banking.

      Large companies already have their own infrastructure hosting their own VPN's. Off-shoring that only adds cost and requires trusting a 3rd party in a different legal jurisdiction with all of your sensitive traffic.

      There is also no guarantee the off shore provider hasn't given up your information to a 3rd party either, apart from their word. You pass all your packets through them and they hold copies of your certificates and their private keys (or you're letting them use their own certs).

    23. Re:Time to start by davester666 · · Score: 1

      The NSA LOVES backdoors. But only if they the ones doing the backdooring, not the ones being backdoored.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    24. Re:Time to start by gargleblast · · Score: 2

      At some point you are going to have to trust someone, but you can improve matters somewhat by acquiring Bob's public key by multiple methods. e.g. web; asking for it via unsecure e-mail; asking someone else to obtain it and forward it to you. And you know what? Doing that is instantly better than trusting so-called Certificate Authorities. The NSA got to them long ago.

    25. Re:Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first country that offers verifiably secure email and VPN services to the world will enjoy an economic boom and the love of billions. And if it's a country like Iceland, it could go a long way toward making them wealthy. And if the US decides to invade Iceland, then at least the gloves can come off and the world can declare the United States a rogue state.

      Why would that make any kind of glove come off? The Icelanders would be supporting terrorists by offering secure Email, and the gloves don't come off when the U.S.A. invades any old country on self-fabricated claims (weapons of mass destruction, anybody? I am actually pretty sure that they'll find more pressure cookers in Iceland than in Iraq). Protocols of the Elders of Zions, anybody? Sorry, wrong century of fascism.

      At any rate, if the U.S.A. finds it necessary to invade Iceland in order to protect the interests of International Democracy (which is just like international terrorism, except that the assassinations use more expensive weapons and are focused on a different ethnic group), its allies will thank them when presented with the overwhelming evidence and selected parts of the lootings.

      At least that is the trend regarding the current NSA "scandals". Everybody is happy to get a share and shit on his constituents.

    26. Re:Time to start by rioki · · Score: 1

      Got ten grand or twenty you can spare?

    27. Re:Time to start by gmanterry · · Score: 1

      You ain't going to do anything. Just shut the fuck up and go back to dreaming about doing something in the face of tyranny.

      You have hit the nail on the head. That's the word I have been looking for "tyranny". That's what this is.

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    28. Re:Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they would have to pry them from my cold dead hands.. after they cut them off with a blow torch..

    29. Re:Time to start by ElusiveJoe · · Score: 1

      And if it's a country like Iceland, it could go a long way toward making them wealthy.

      The US has shown that it can bend any "democratic" country to its will, even without arms. No place is safe in the world, today.

    30. Re:Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell? Why would I trust ANY country, or for that matter ANY third party with my encryption codes? I generate them myself, keep them to myself and never disclose them to the government or to any business.

      Do you use a an OS partially or wholly developed in the US (e.g. Windows, OSX, Linux binary blobs) with security updates? Then they probably already have your keys. Trivial to have a hidden OS service that watches for common types of encryption keys and uploads/records them "just in case".

      Encryption is pointless when the endpoints can be easily and secretly compromised. In the US with a security letter. Sad but true.

    31. Re:Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the point. If you tried to start a service to facilitate secure email, say using GPG but with a user friendliness for the masses, you'd get shut down by the gov't. No question in my mind.

    32. Re:Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no need for the service provider to decrypt and re-encrypt the messages. The sender and receiver should have already exchanged public keys.

    33. Re:Time to start by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

      Well, there have been several attempts at bulletproof hosting, cyberbunker type offerings. The problem seems to be that they attract mostly criminals, paedophiles, and extremists of various tendencies.

      (OT) Coincidentally, I have been rereading Stephenson myself -- After Snow Crash and Cryptonomicon I am now devouring Anathem. I didn't really appreciate the first time, but now I am thoroughly enjoying it.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    34. Re:Time to start by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Such a system is inherently insecure. If I want to exchange information with another person secretly, I need to decide what level of secrecy is necessary. Is the content of the email the thing to be protected? If so, I must encrypt the content. If the fact that I am communicating with that party is also to be concealed, email is not the right system. In email, the addressing information is open by design, and anything that looks and feels like email will have that characteristic.

    35. Re:Time to start by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      You have to get the public key from someone you trust. The best method is in-person key exchange. Another reasonably secure method is having them send a handwritten ascii-coded key in a sealed envelope. If you're really not very trusting at all, you can then read that back to them over the phone for verification that nobody switched envelopes and hand-printed a fake key on the letter.

      If there is a third party you trust, you can have the third party sign their copy of the public key. That is reasonably secure, and much less than the level of trust you would need of an email host. You merely are trusting that they are going to do a one-time transaction that you can later verify without pulling a switcharoo on you. You're not giving anybody the ability to decrypt messages meant for you or third parties.

      Ultimately, all systems for exchanging information depend on some level of trust that what is ostensibly happening is actually happening. In the in-person key exchange, for example, you are trusting that the person who meets you is not an imposter. In all situations, you are trusting that the person receiving the information has a secure system and is not intentionally or unintentionally sharing your secrets with a third party unknown to you.

    36. Re:Time to start by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      No I'm not. MY point is that email addresses are not secure and cannot be made secure without giving them to a third party that I have no reason to trust.

      Why should I trust you and your supposedly secure email service? How do I know you don't work for the NSA? The MSS? The GRU? Mossad? Google?

      Whom is Slashdot working for/with?

    37. Re:Time to start by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The first country that offers verifiably secure email and VPN services to the world will enjoy an economic boom and the love of billions.

      There is no such thing as verifiable security. Next business plan!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    38. Re:Time to start by randallman · · Score: 1

      Why not use S/MIME or PGP? Point to point encryption is the only way to secure messages.

    39. Re:Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Initial key exchange in-person. Periodic meet-ups to do the same. You could sort-of trust the channel enough to do key exchange AFTER the initial one.

    40. Re:Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The first country that offers verifiably secure email and VPN services to the world will..."

      Will probably incur the wrath of the US Government. Some of it overt, some of it secret.

    41. Re:Time to start by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      It IS funny how there are plenty of countries willing to let you evade your tax responsibilities by storing your money there, but so few seem to be willing to let you claim your right to privacy by storing your data there. Both could be equally profitable.

    42. Re:Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darknets

    43. Re:Time to start by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The main thing is to find that secure email service that is beyond the reach of the NSA.

      I'll have to look at kolab. $10/mo is a good deal if it's really secure and private.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    44. Re:Time to start by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you're wrong. And you don't need that many subscribers to make a secure webmail system profitable.

      It doesn't have to be everyone to be effective. It just has to be growing.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    45. Re:Time to start by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as "verifiably secure".

      Is that really true? As you say, "minimize the number of people you need to trust".

      I'm prepared to trust somebody, and crowd-sourcing trust might be effective.

      We're not going to make it impossible for the NSA to impose their will if they're willing to start assassinating foreign nationals. But we can raise the bar so high that it's not worth it for them.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    46. Re:Time to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's where the web of trust, key exchange parties and other methods come in. The problem is, people can't be bothered and every time i have tried to move to GPG signatures are ignored, and I have no private keys for anybody (because no one understands why they should bother).

    47. Re:Time to start by Anti-Social+Network · · Score: 1

      Why? Because using a VPN of this nature, in addition to standard crypto methods between parties will defeat the metadata loophole. All your data routes through a foreign host and, unless they're co-opted by the NSA, your metadata is still secure. If they're unrelated to any of your other business, the metadata is useless to the VPN provider. Regular PGP keys will keep them from reading your actual data.

      --
      Goddammit just when I get my first +5 the Beta rolls out and kills everything
    48. Re:Time to start by someSnarkyBastard · · Score: 1

      SpiderOak would be a good one. It's cross-platform, FOSS-friendly, and has a rather impressive feature-set. I'm frankly surprised they aren't better known by now.

    49. Re:Time to start by someSnarkyBastard · · Score: 1

      Because "our betters" use those money-saving services. Therefore they are A-OK with storing money offshore and will not prosecute such activities.

    50. Re:Time to start by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Big words. A hint of jail time and you'll give them up unless you fear that giving them up will result in more jail time than not giving them up.

    51. Re:Time to start by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Well, that's one of the show-stoppers to any of this stuff. For most, I doubt it would take more than strong hints of letters to employer, family, friends that you would find embarrassing. Perhaps threat of a visit to your boss by a lawman-type to let him know you were been looked at and could they offer any insights which might be useful?

      It's not even really so much the notion that we've become soft (that may be argued, and successfully, but it's still beside the point) as that a man faced with loss of income, blacklisting with prospective employers (even just hints of "official notice" would be sufficient for most), and subsequent loss of ability to provide for loved ones is in all likelihood gonna fold. Most of us would, and readily enough.

      Lotta chest-thumping and loads of indignation here and abouts, but threat to family is one heckuva trump card.

    52. Re:Time to start by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Thanks for the link.

      Of course, it isn't open-source (yet), so the effectiveness of its security can't be verified. Are they really using good security practices (e.g., not doing anything stupid like WEP)? Is the information truly secure (no backdoor keys)? Until their code can be audited, users just have to "take their word" that the data is properly encrypted.

      It also seems to be situated in a single country (in this case, the United States of America), making it - and its users - vulnerable to the whims of that nation's governance. Were they multinational, should the USA decide to shut them down, all they could seize would be American assets; however, international customers would still be able to retrieve their data. MegaUpload was a lesson on the frailty of a that approach to creating a data-haven (not that Megaupload was really a datahaven, but the lesson is still applicable).

      So SpiderOak is a nice step, but not the panacea it first appears to be.

      Having said all that, I still am considering using it ;-)

    53. Re:Time to start by lite99 · · Score: 1

      Finland, maybe not. We are soon allowing our police to use (slightly, at first) criminal actions in secret to do surveillance on us. Things like planting trojans and intercepting cell audio and data - a really slippery slope, but practically nobody cares and the "press" keeps mostly quiet, why else, they are owned by the establishment.

  3. Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are not going to have much advanced IT business left over there soon if this goes on.

    1. Re:Sorry... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are not going to have much advanced IT business left over there soon if this goes on.

      I think we are witnessing the (not very) slow disintegration of the principals and reality of the American Internet. Whether the internet itself will survive this is another matter.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:Sorry... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We all knew this would happen. As soon as the government saw that the Internet was an opportunity and / or threat, they would work to get it under their control. Actually took them a bit longer than I expected, although the NSA-style snooping has likely gone on longer than we realize.

      Nothing to see here, move along.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Sorry... by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nothing to see here, move along.

      Plenty to see here. Mainly, that businesses now have yet another reason to offshore.

    4. Re:Sorry... by Fjandr · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a secret warrant issued by a secret court, binding the recipient to secrecy under pain of imprisonment, and with no way to contest the warrant. And since it's the NSA, you can't even see evidence used against you because it's obviously in regards to national security...even if it isn't.

    5. Re:Sorry... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      It wouldn't be NSA style if you realized it was going on....

    6. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a secret warrant issued by a secret court, binding the recipient to secrecy under pain of imprisonment, and with no way to contest the warrant. And since it's the NSA, you can't even see evidence used against you because it's obviously in regards to national security...even if it isn't.

      You didn't answer the question.

    7. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bonus for conservative Republicans is that they can pass legislation like CISPA and then claim all the companies are leaving because of environmental laws. It's a two-for-one deal, get the police state they dream of along with killing environmental and safety regulations.

    8. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a secret.

    9. Re:Sorry... by icebike · · Score: 0

      How long do the Democrats have to be in office before it becomes THEIR problem and THEIR fault.
      Isn't 6 years enough time to return to the constitution if they ever intended to?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:Sorry... by Krenair · · Score: 2

      How do you know what country the poster was in? I don't think all countries allow warrants to demand crypto keys...

    11. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He did.

    12. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      "It's a secret warrant issued by a secret court, binding the recipient to secrecy under pain of imprisonment, and with no way to contest the warrant. And since it's the NSA, you can't even see evidence used against you because it's obviously in regards to national security...even if it isn't." - Doc Daneeka

    13. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As an outsider, I really don't freakin' understand how Americans are willing to ignore the most outrageous problems to defend their chosen party. Republican, Democrat, it doesn't make any sense. You can have someone who is a Democrat defending a baby slaughtering program(merely an example) for the sole reason that it isn't what the Republicans support. You guys are sooooooo weird! It's like your identity as a person revolves around which party you voted for.
      If one started the program and the other continues it - they're both at fault and both just as wrong.

    14. Re:Sorry... by wooferhound · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a secret warrant issued by a secret court, binding the recipient to secrecy under pain of imprisonment, and with no way to contest the warrant. And since it's the NSA, you can't even see evidence used against you because it's obviously in regards to national security...even if it isn't.

      Next thing to come will be the Secret Police . . .

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    15. Re:Sorry... by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      The internet was designed to survive a nuclear war, and the flame war going on because of the NSA surely counts as the next closest thing. Given that most of the "great" achievements of the USA were done by foreigners, I think it's time to import the next generation.

    16. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next thing to come will be the Secret Police . . .

      why do you need secret police when you already have the NSA?

    17. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the only reason it works is...

    18. Re:Sorry... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      [johnny fever]"and then, the PHONE COPS, man![/fever]

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    19. Re:Sorry... by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Tribunal And, yea, it's been done plenty of times before in various ways. But it's always so chilling to see how often the US behaves so much like Cardassia, especially the "patriots" who in one breathe speak of their loyalty to the state and in the next speak of their guns to protect their family from the state. In any case, there's plenty of DS9 episodes are much more accessible ways to demonstrate the evil of what we see today. I just don't think enough people are willing to see the obvious parallels. :/

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    20. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... As an outsider, I really don't freakin' understand how Americans are willing to ignore the most outrageous problems ...

      I am an outsider and I know my local politicians aren't so different. Members of party X will always claim that Party Y has worse policies, more dangerous laws, and no competency to manage a country.

      The USA also includes the 'tough on crime', war on drugs/terror/piracy, and 'neo-liberalism good; socialism bad' tropes that simply deny policies which give practical solutions.

    21. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disintegration of principals? How will schools be managed? Think of the children(TM)!

    22. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it already? Do You know them? Can You know who they are or how they operate?

    23. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, most don't.

    24. Re:Sorry... by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      I think it's time to import the next generation.

      How are we not already doing that? For all the articles and snarky comments we see about H1B1 (and other work related) visas on here....

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    25. Re:Sorry... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      It's the new form of family honour. For some reason people can see it in east Asian cultures and blame it for things like the problems at Fukushima, but when Americans show loyalty to their chosen party even when they are a bunch of crooks and do things that are indefensible they somehow don't make the connection.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    26. Re:Sorry... by richlv · · Score: 4, Insightful

      most americans seem to be patriotic beyond reason. this might be caused by being taught from early on that they are morally, military and in any other way superior to any other country. later they keep those views and will defend _anything_ being done. it might be by weird reasoning, "they do it too" or other methods.

      it might help in some cases, but looks like long term it leads to an inability to criticise real problems and a decline.

      --
      Rich
    27. Re:Sorry... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      It's a secret warrant issued by a secret court, binding the recipient to secrecy under pain of imprisonment, and with no way to contest the warrant. And since it's the NSA, you can't even see evidence used against you because it's obviously in regards to national security...even if it isn't.

      That is not the NSA. The NSA does not work like that. FBI/DEA/DOJ work like that.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    28. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like how Kim Il Jong (North Korean Dictator) parades around the world as a singer (Psy)? And you pay to see this dictator...I mean singer perform..further funding his delusions of grandeur.

    29. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long do the Democrats have to be in office before it becomes THEIR problem and THEIR fault.
      Isn't 6 years enough time to return to the constitution if they ever intended to?

      How many administrations have to go by before it's recognized as institutional, not political?

    30. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just being pragmatic. 3rd party candidates aren't viable. Sorry. They aren't.
      The Dems aren't perfect, but the GOP is off the rocker fucking insane. They aren't even a political party anymore. For the past decade we've been in panic crisis mode with a gang of lunatics backed by the ultra-rich. As far as I can tell the GOP is making an honest effort to destroy the country for the pocket books of a select few, while using theology as as stick to control a good 30% of the population. There are prominent GOP politicians that openly say that we are "in the end times" and that a religious apocalypse is coming. I'm not even fucking kidding. The fact that these people get elected shows that there is something disturbingly wrong with this country.

      Honestly, the Dems are the best we can do with a gun to our head. With any luck the GOP will finally implode and perhaps after a decade of not controlling congress and the presidential seat they'll marginalize their extremists and become somewhat sane again.

    31. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homeland security.....

    32. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone considered just UNPLUGGING their computer? There, no more internet. (If you have a WiFi card in it, turn the damn thing off)

    33. Re:Sorry... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I guess the proper analogy depends on where you're from, but just shooting a guess from what I've seen on the net every time the World Cup rolls around...

      They're not "government leadership." They're "football (soccer) teams."

    34. Re:Sorry... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Well, it is quite simple. False Dichotomy makes people choose the "lessor of two evils" rather than picking the person that will represent them the best. Do you really think that Harry Reid or Mitch McConnell are the best those states have to offer?

      Every year we see polling data that indicates that most people hate everyone in Congress and want "none of the above". I do have a none of the above fix for this problem, and it is simple. Put "None of the Above" on the ballot, and if that gets 50%+1 votes, ALL of the people listed can never run for any office ever again.

      Lets get all the douchebags out of office permanently.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    35. Re:Sorry... by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

      The United States is going to become a Turd World IT backwater with our government's obsession with spying on everyone.

      Why did we kick the British out of here in the first place?

      --
      Corporatism != Free Market
    36. Re:Sorry... by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Lesser. 'Lessor' refers to someone who leases something to another.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    37. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a secret warrant issued by a secret court, binding the recipient to secrecy under pain of imprisonment, and with no way to contest the warrant. And since it's the NSA, you can't even see evidence used against you because it's obviously in regards to national security...even if it isn't.

      Next thing to come will be the Secret Police . . .

      They'll draft you and they'll jail your niece!

    38. Re:Sorry... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      The Cardassians were often seen as a stand-in for Israelis...there are more parallels to support this idea I think.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    39. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could mod, you'd have +5

    40. Re:Sorry... by icebike · · Score: 1

      That is pretty much a universal truth.

      Germans are taught that they are morally superior for having once been the world's worst rogue state, and having virtually invented mass extermination. By a twisted logic, having seen the error in their ways, they are now somehow better able to cast judgement on other countries.

      The most patriotic man america has produced in a long time is living in forced exile in Russia.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    41. Re:Sorry... by richlv · · Score: 1

      that's not really true - germans are very sensitive about ww2 topics and lots of other things. also, i mentioned "patriotic beyond reason", which includes supporting anything wicked being done... including that nsa stuff ;)

      --
      Rich
    42. Re:Sorry... by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      most americans seem to be patriotic beyond reason. this might be caused by being taught from early on that they are morally, military and in any other way superior to any other country. later they keep those views and will defend _anything_ being done. it might be by weird reasoning, "they do it too" or other methods.

      it might help in some cases, but looks like long term it leads to an inability to criticise real problems and a decline.

      I don't understand why anyone assumes that US citizens are taught different things or that US citizens are less intelligent that citizens of other countries.

      It seems pretty obvious to me that the answer to why our politics seem odd, why we vote for things not in our best interest, is 100% because of the amount of money and corporations involved in our democracy. Every major economic powerhouse on the planet wants to influence US politics. That means our citizens are subjected to a massive amount of disinformation, entire news networks set up to push political party view points, huge amounts of lobbyists from huge amounts of corporations, etc...

      And that isn't even getting into the elections and campaign finance.

      Just look at this list of companies: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2012/full_list/

      Now imagine every single one of them buying up media time (and maybe buying entire media networks!), donating to local and national elections, paying for lobbyists to bribe/influence your politicians, etc.. Unless your country already had in-place very strong election laws and lobbying laws, you'd start voting exactly like US citizens do, with a few cultural differences here and there.

  4. SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by lesincompetent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hope that when american corporations start seeing their customers scared away by this 1984 crap they'll turn their lobbying powers to reverse the trend.
    Isn't this how politics work in the US, the country that legalized bribery?

    1. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not that many customers are going to be scared off.
      Most people don't care about the NSA reading their data.
      Businesses care about competitors reading their data, not the NSA.

    2. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by lesincompetent · · Score: 1

      Tell that to Airbus.

    3. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Bovius · · Score: 1

      Not that many customers are going to be scared off.
      Most people don't care about the NSA reading their data.
      Businesses care about competitors reading their data, not the NSA.

      This, sadly. I wish the general public could be bothered with this, and I also wish we could point to one particular distraction as the culprit, like Jersey Shore or the fact that we haven't been able to run a planned government budget since 1997, but the NSA issue is a particularly bad symptom of a larger problem.

      Actually, that budget thing sounds pretty bad.

    4. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by jschrod · · Score: 5, Insightful
      For European companies, the NSA reading their data equals their competitors reading their data. This has been known here since at least the early 90s, when Echolon data was used for commercial advantage of US companies.

      Some European companies really don't care. But some do. That's why there was always a healthy mistrust in competetive European companies concerning their crucial data out of house, and why cloud computing has a slower uptake here than in the US. (Their unimportant data, they could care less about, even if it's personal data and against the EU privacy laws. That's life.)

      --

      Joachim

      People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

    5. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_bribery_scandals
      Think how this could have all not made the press and the NSA could be optically "above such things".
      RE "Most people don't care about the NSA reading their data." so your rights dont protect as much until your a member of the press or a political leader asking questions :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by cold+fjord · · Score: 1
      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    7. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Echolon data was used for commercial advantage of US companies.

      [citation needed]

    8. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      For European companies, the NSA reading their data equals their competitors reading their data. This has been known here since at least the early 90s, when Echolon data was used for commercial advantage of US companies.

      That isn't really true.

      Why We Spy on Our Allies - By R. James Woolsey, former Director of CIA

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    9. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by jschrod · · Score: 4, Informative
      You're lame. AC for real.

      It's even cited with references on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON#Examples_of_industrial_espionage

      --

      Joachim

      People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

    10. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of businesses facing major losses because their rivals can say, "We are NSA free" and get a contract over their US counterparts.

      Literally true. Here in Brazil at leas one major business ISP is constantly advertising something like this: "In these times of espionage come to ${ISP_NAME} and be protected from international spies! Here your e-mail can be this and that and blah-blah-blah!" (The features listed have nothing to do with actually protecting the data, but clueless business people won't notice.)

      I have no idea what the numbers are, but at the very least Google's Brazilian branch must be feeling the heat.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    11. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a lot of businesses facing major losses because their rivals can say, "We are NSA free" and get a contract over their US counterparts.

      That's because people are idiots. You're running away from the large, obvious bear right into a pack of rabid wolves.

      It isn't the US businesses, it is the anti-US sentiment building worldwide as the Guardian keeps the US hate stoked with daily revelations.

      Again, because people are idiots and don't have the mental ability to focus on more than one opponent at a time, or understand complex issues which involve more than one variable.

      I'm pondering a Hong Kong drop because a VC told me that it would get my startup taken seriously.

      Case in point. You're avoiding the US agency which is operating on the shady side of the law, in favor of a country which does just as much, and more, fully legally.

    12. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For European companies, the NSA reading their data equals their competitors reading their data. This has been known here since at least the early 90s, when Echolon data was used for commercial advantage of US companies.

      And non-US countries have all been helped by non-US intelligence agencies for commercial advantage as well.

      France has been a well-known example of using industrial espionage. Do we need to mention China at all?

      I don't particularly like it either (and consider it "cheating" if you can't come up with your own ideas), but the main difference is that the NSA has simply been caught in a more red-handed fashion at the moment.

      (Though the NSA is going farther and gathering data on "regular" folks as well, and not just companies and governments.)

    13. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by ewibble · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you are going to believe the former director of a spy agency?

    14. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      They talk about how European stuff is more expensive and lower quality than US, and we only watch them because they bribe everyone, and we are trying to level the playing field. I guess that's why when Chrysler build a sports car around their V10 truck engine, they bought off-the-shefl brake systems from Bosch (German), because they didn't know how to make brakes themselves (having been sentenced to a Chrysler LeBaron convertible by family, I can believe it).

      Airbus and the automakers are at least as advanced. Some of the networking gear from Israel is better than most US gear. There are lots of examples of friends who have at least something that's better than what we have.

    15. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      We don't spy on them because we are so much better than them we don't need to. Only the American ignorant could believe that. When Chrysler put together a sports car based on their V10 truck engine, they turned to Germans (Bosch) to provide the brakes. When GM wanted to make a performance version of the Corvette, they turned to Lotus to handle the suspension for the 1990 ZR-1 (why? because GM knows it screwed up the '84 so badly they lost a number of previously dedicated customers). For cars and airplanes, we often turn to European countries. Israel makes some networking gear that's at least equal to the American stuff.

      And American shipyards are losing out on contracts. Because of labor costs? No, because the foreign yards have more advanced facilities. There are many examples of American industry being behind the rest of the world. We export hate and lawsuits. We import most everything else.

      The assertion that we obviously don't spy because we are so much better than everyone else is silly.

    16. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      For European companies, the NSA reading their data equals their competitors reading their data. This has been known here since at least the early 90s, when Echolon data was used for commercial advantage of US companies.

      That isn't really true.

      Why We Spy on Our Allies - By R. James Woolsey, former Director of CIA

      Really? You're going to take that yay-America propaganda as trustworthy?

    17. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      I don't see any denial about bribes in your post.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    18. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      Once again I see no denial of bribes in your post.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    19. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      As opposed to random internet opinion guy making even less supported claims? Hard choice.

      Maybe you can help, are you doing to deny that bribery is a problem in international competition?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    20. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      As opposed to Booo! anti-American propaganda? Are you challenging his statements of fact? It doesn't appear so.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    21. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by icebike · · Score: 1, Troll

      I hope that when american corporations start seeing their customers scared away by this 1984 crap they'll turn their lobbying powers to reverse the trend. Isn't this how politics work in the US, the country that legalized bribery?

      Would someone please hurry up and start scaring them away?!!

      Because I'm not seeing any rush to forbid Facebook or Google or restrict use of American Cloud providers.
      In fact they are growing faster than their off-shore competition.

      Oh, yes, we've seen the boastful threats of EU legislation, but the EU can't even agree that Tuesday follows Monday,
      let alone do any thing to inflict a penalty on anyone using American services.

      And in spite of the indignant bashing of all things American (and there is no doubt a great deal of bashing is due),
      EU countries ae doing the exact same thing. Its just that they don't have a true patriot like Edward Snowden.

      But please, drum up support to ban the use of US storage services in all the countries of the world.
      You will be doing us helpless Americans a huge favor.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    22. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by jareth-0205 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't speak of the bribery, I haven't done the leg-work to find out, but as for the rest...

      The general tone of the whole piece is that of someone who thinks the American way is superior and infallible and no other way can have merit, which makes me instantly suspicious of his bias. That he sits there and declares there is nothing worth stealing is a bit unlikely, unless you believe in US-superiority in all things.
      I question his judgement because he talks about Europe as if it's one entity. He talks about Europe like it has a single communist government, when its member states have a large range of political leanings.

      I suppose if your job is constantly looking outward at the threatening foreign lands then you're going to get a bit... tainted.

    23. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      bribing abroad isn't legal for europeans anymore.

      anyways, leveling the playing field is quite simple - you need because we have better certain craftsmen and engineers.

      why do you think swedish weapons are bought by the pentagon? because they bribed the generals?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    24. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Dual post because my browser crashed. I don't see anything about bribes in my post either. I saw no denials in your post about my assessment of technology. So you concede that R. James Woolsey's main premise that there's no need to spy because the rest of the world is so backwater is patently false?

      I can't deny a stated goal of spying is identifying illegal acts. Given the lack of truth behind the only verifiable premise, why would I blindly accept the other?

    25. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >> Most people don't care about the NSA reading their data.

      If I were part of a group trying to start a 3rd political party, I would be afraid of NSA snooping. American citizens should not be afraid of what their government will do to them if they seek political reform.

    26. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Aighearach · · Score: 0

      How you feel about the tone shouldn't have anything to do with your perception of the facts. That it does makes me instantly suspicious of your bias.

    27. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      the random internet guy has a chance of telling the truth.

      the 3 letter agencies: guaranteed that they are lying or holding back the truth. we KNOW that, for a solid fact, now.

      a broken clock is right twice a day. even such a clock is more trustable than our 3 letter agencies.

      sigh ;(

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    28. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol the Airbus one was an example of Boeing posting shit on their own fucking website.
      That same post shows people talking about other files they found at the time labeled PROPRIETARY
      Airbus just googled for files on Boeings website.

      The first, is from 1993. And hardly amounts to the recording of millions of phone calls to and from france.

    29. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a bit daft? Here it is: Everyone bribes in africa, some do in china, russia, south-america and middle east, vefy few do in europe and north-america. It's illegal for american and european companies to bribe anywhere. Not that it stops everyone, but rest assured, europeans aren't bribing any more than americans.

    30. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, how cute! You defend your country's industrial espionage by linking to questionable accusations of biased sources that claim that competitors are doing something similar and that would somehow make it OK that the U.S. has been stealing European technology and gaining inside information in trade negotiations with European companies for decades. It is sad, but cute.

    31. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't the US businesses, it is the anti-US sentiment building worldwide as the Guardian keeps the US hate stoked with daily revelations.

      Yeah, those pesky messengers with their evil facts. I'd prefer some authentic U.S. government propaganda.

    32. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

      Dual post because my browser crashed.

      Don't worry, your browser is fine, it was NSA.

    33. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      I hope that when american corporations start seeing their customers scared away by this 1984 crap they'll turn their lobbying powers to reverse the trend.
        Isn't this how politics work in the US, the country that legalized bribery?

      You mean the multinational companies who base themselves wherever and no longer pay tax?

      They'll just leave the US and follow their customer base.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    34. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Would that be the same Boeing who took confidential and NDAed Airbus information off of a DoD contract negotiator and then gave her a job after she awarded the contract to Boeing? You know, the scandal that started the whole KC-135 replacement bullshit which has been ongoing for over a decade now. I seem to remember that multiple people ended up in jail over that one...

      Airbus including in a presentation slides that are marked "BOEING PROPRIETARY" means nothing - you can stamp all sorts on documents, doesn't mean shit.

    35. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by lesincompetent · · Score: 1

      Don't really care, as long as the coutry (as a whole) pays the price. Maybe that will FINALLY stir something up.
      Paradoxically enough even the big scary multinationals are somewhat the victims of this perverse system IMHO. They have been coerced into compliance.

    36. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well lets hope so, otherwise we are fucked. You think you are pissed? think about how pisse other nations are about this.

    37. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by ewibble · · Score: 1

      I didn't say why they spy, how on earth would I know? I could only take a slightly informed guess. Since the former chief deceiver of a agency specifically set up to spy (deceive) says why they are spying, it is actually less believable than some random person that probably has no vested interest protecting that agencies secrets.

      Are you denying that the US government would never spy on another country to gain an unfair market advantage? Or if they did that they wouldn't deny it?

    38. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find this sickening. We need someone with VERY deep pockets to receive a notice like this, and take it up to the Supreme Court. If a private system is designed with security in mind, the government should have no place coming in after the fact and telling them to allow tapping or go to jail. In fact, a careful reading of the LavaBit rulings showed that according to the judge in the case, if no wire tapping capability exists in a given product (either because it's not feasible, or it is designed to resist wire tapping), then the creator/operator of the product will be held in contempt if a wiretap order was ever filed.

    39. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Notice how he says the Europeans are less competitive because basically they're not so gung-ho on laissez-faire capitalism. Another way to put this is that, to level the playing field, European standards of living should be dragged down to US levels. Efficiency is always good for the productivity of an organization but often bad for the individual (it only takes some of the easiest and most natural actions in capitalism - squeezing employees' pay and externalizing costs to society). It's why it's more ethical to buy from a first-world clothing manufacturer (theoretically...not sure if such a thing exists) than a sweatshop. Yes the sweatshop is "highly efficient" and "more competitive" but there are hidden costs which you are incurring to society by supporting them.

      This situation could play out again in a couple of decades, with China taking the role of the US and the US taking the role of Europe....those statist Americans who will resort to bribery instead of "competing." China will just want to level the playing field.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  5. Playing devil's advocate... by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the public reaction would be if some pro-democracy dissident who is operating covertly in their own hostile country is murdered and the country gives a press release saying that they couldn't have found their criminal if it wasn't for the help of the NSA compromising internet security...

    Does that put the NSA/FISA on the side of dictatorships and other anti-freedom nations?

    --
    No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
    1. Re:Playing devil's advocate... by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      Since you are making up imaginary circumstances to achieve your desired outcome, how do you know the space aliens didn't intervene to help the hostile country? Does that make the hostile country just a pawn of the space aliens?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Playing devil's advocate... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      imaginary circumstances

      What imaginary circumstances? That some guy in Hong Kong might log into the NSA, download all of their back door documentation, and start using that information for their own gain?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:Playing devil's advocate... by Desler · · Score: 1

      No, it simply means they used the wrong means to get a positive end. No different than cops planting evidence and beating a suspect to catch the real criminal in a case.

    4. Re:Playing devil's advocate... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re side of dictatorships and other anti-freedom nations?
      http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2013-10-17/apologist-assassination-americans-be-named-new-homeland-security-chief
      Guess your may find out that the terms "pro-democracy", "dissident" and "internet security" means legally speaking soon :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Playing devil's advocate... by eyegone · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the public reaction would be if some pro-democracy dissident who is operating covertly in their own hostile country is murdered and the country gives a press release saying that they couldn't have found their criminal if it wasn't for the help of the NSA compromising internet security...

      It depends. Is American Idol on that night?

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    6. Re:Playing devil's advocate... by xvan · · Score: 1

      As far as we know, all the leaks have been from insiders...

      I'd expect the agency that claims to monitor the whole internet to be able to monitor their own network... But you never know...

      Ofcourse inside leaks might occur from a spy instead of an attention whore...

    7. Re:Playing devil's advocate... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well usa has already done bombing of dissidents on behalf of foreign nations. that's what the the drone strikes are, technically. the host nation doesn't want to send in cops so they can ask for them to be hellfired from the sky.

      (not pro democracy dissidents but dissidents none the less)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Playing devil's advocate... by WeeBit · · Score: 1

      "Does that put the NSA/FISA on the side of dictatorships and other anti-freedom nations?"

      No .... Liar! Liar! Pants on fire!

    9. Re:Playing devil's advocate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is already on that side. It is a government agency of one of the major anti-freedom nation that actively violates human rights.

  6. DoS? by dex22 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is to stop the NSA doing a form of DoS attack on these types of services by demanding keys, and giving the services little option but to shut down?

    The effect of this is to remove secure competitors from the market and force users onto pre-compromised services.

    1. Re:DoS? by LordLucless · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The effect of this is to remove secure competitors from the market and force users onto overseas services.

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    2. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is to stop the NSA doing a form of DoS attack on these types of services by demanding keys, and giving the services little option but to shut down?

      The effect of this is to remove secure competitors from the market and force users onto pre-compromised services.

      The free market at work.

    3. Re:DoS? by cyberjock1980 · · Score: 2

      And even if you go with Brand-X VPN service that is all over the world, what's to say that because they might have servers in the USA their key isn't already compromised? Or that someone at Brand-X wasn't paid off by the NSA for the key? Or that they obtained the key directly from the key right when it was signed?

      Let's go all out on this. I'm really curious to see what others think of these conspiracy theories. Because lately they could just as easily be believed because of some of the stuff that has come to light from Snowden.

      Is there even a design where the VPN service could be compelled to give up the keys, but still be secure? I'm thinking no, but hoping someone can validate that.

    4. Re: DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The effect will hopefully be for users to make their own damn vpn (really, it's not hard) and stop trusting third parties for things that should be confidential.

    5. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so this is a RICO case? lets look at Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act

      from the summery
      'There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business or property" can sue one or more "racketeers". The plaintiff must prove the existence of an "enterprise". The defendant(s) are not the enterprise; in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s) and the enterprise: either the defendant(s) invested the proceeds of the pattern of racketeering activity into the enterprise; or the defendant(s) acquired or maintained an interest in, or control over, the enterprise through the pattern of racketeering activity; or the defendant(s) conducted or participated in the affairs of the enterprise "through" the pattern of racketeering activity; or the defendant(s) conspired to do one of the above. In essence, the enterprise is the illegal device of the racketeers. A civil RICO action, like many lawsuits based on federal law, can be filed in state or federal court.[2]"

      IANAL but I think we have ourselves a good old fashion treble damages lawsuit brewing.

    6. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Legally? A whole lot.
      In practice, nothing. They could do it and get away with it and you'd never be able to prove it.

      Secret courts, secret budget, no real oversight. There is no record of existing oversight mechanisms ever being triggered. This means that the secret courts are essentially a rubber stamping process.

      Since this is security, and you must assume worst case, you must assume the NSA can and will do anything and everything. I do enjoy how recent revelations have spurred the crypto/sec communities in to re-evaluating assumptions about anything the NSA might have touched or might be able to do.

    7. Re:DoS? by Teckla · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The effect of this is to remove secure competitors from the market and force users onto pre-compromised services.

      I know this is going to sound mighty odd, but hear me out...

      I kind of wish the NSA sold things like consumer routers, for which they wrote all the firmware, user interface, etc.

      The NSA employs Really Ridiculously Smart People, so then I could count on my router being really, really secure against everyone and everything... except the NSA.

      Which would be an OK trade-off for me, and I think would be an OK trade-off for a lot of people...

    8. Re:DoS? by gallondr00nk · · Score: 1

      What is to stop the NSA doing a form of DoS attack on these types of services by demanding keys, and giving the services little option but to shut down?

      Nothing, seemingly. The NSA seem to act completely in secret, US citizens aren't privy to their actions or any court rulings except those disclosed months or years after the ruling. It's like playing a game where no-one but one player knows the rules, you are certain to lose.

      The choice seems to be either compromise your service, or shut down your business. I really feel for anyone who is having to give up their livlihood on account of their actions.

      One thing is certain. This is the antithesis of democracy.

    9. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The government generally isn't liable for its own actions short of giving itself liability via an act of congress. Simply put your screwed. Unless the people violently rise up (and I won't be discouraging anybody from doing that) like the 'terrorists' did/are we won't see meaningful change. We will merely be blowing away good money to fight a losing battle.

    10. Re:DoS? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      The NSA employs Really Ridiculously Smart People, so then I could count on my router being really, really secure against everyone and everything... except the NSA.

      Which would be an OK trade-off for me, and I think would be an OK trade-off for a lot of people...

      oh, totes. if the nsa gave you a router with a 100% backdoor for them, then you would be golden against all other threats. except... obv the nsa can be infiltrated cf snowden. and others could engineer your router backdoor. and if the nsa has a router backdoor they could potentially get access to your computer and all your bizness, not to mention the computers and bizness of everybody you communicate with.

      So, perhaps you would rethink your hypothetical statement?

    11. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >The effect of this is to remove secure competitors from the market and force users onto overseas services.

      Perhaps forcing all U.S. based VPN providers that won't cooperate to shut down is part of the plan. Once you are forced to start dealing with "foreign" VPN providers they will claim that they can legally spy on you.

    12. Re:DoS? by PPH · · Score: 1

      That will work until the US Congress passes a law similar to FATCA which compels foreign businesses to turn over financial records involving US persons. So far, few if any foreign countries have attempted to defend their sovereignty to protect Americans. I doubt much will change when it comes to data.

      It matters very little anyway. Because the 'big money' is in corporate accounts and corporate data. You and I, as individuals, can't wave a magic legal wand and move ourselves offshore. Corporations can. And that's who the people running offshore banks or data services cater to.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    13. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone on slashdot most likely already runs their own home-made router. Something like a low powered comptuer with some network cards and OSS like OpenBSD, or Linux, or FreeBSD. Then at least you have a proper router not some POS switch with a NAT on top.

      Then again, people that use "routers" probably use NAT as a "firewall"....

    14. Re:DoS? by Teckla · · Score: 1

      oh, totes. if the nsa gave you a router with a 100% backdoor for them, then you would be golden against all other threats. except... obv the nsa can be infiltrated cf snowden. and others could engineer your router backdoor. and if the nsa has a router backdoor they could potentially get access to your computer and all your bizness, not to mention the computers and bizness of everybody you communicate with.

      I would trust the NSA's security guys to get security better than any for-profit company with strong economic incentive to cut corners.

      And I realize I'd be handing the NSA the keys to get inside my network -- that's the trade-off I think many people would find worthwhile -- giving the NSA access in exchange for them writing the most secure firmware they possibly could.

    15. Re:DoS? by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      What exactly makes you think the NSA would have any incentive to do a better job than the existing producers? My guess would be the NSA's products would be *worse*. They don't need you to trust them. They don't need to turn a profit. Things are easier for them if you shit is not secured. And they don't give a damn if anyone else reads your traffic. Exactly what incentive would they have to make things secure?

    16. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They certainly wouldn't, also this plan was already played out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip [wikipedia.org].

    17. Re:DoS? by eyegone · · Score: 1

      One thing is certain. This is the antithesis of democracy.

      Bullshit.

      It may be illiberal; it may be unconstitutional; but it is very, very democratic.

      A large majority of human beings have always been (and presumably always will be) perfectly happy to trade something as abstract as "privacy" or "liberty" for the comforting illusion of protection from the bogeyman de jour.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    18. Re:DoS? by myowntrueself · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That will work until the US Congress passes a law similar to FATCA which compels foreign businesses to turn over financial records involving US persons. So far, few if any foreign countries have attempted to defend their sovereignty to protect Americans. I doubt much will change when it comes to data.

      It matters very little anyway. Because the 'big money' is in corporate accounts and corporate data. You and I, as individuals, can't wave a magic legal wand and move ourselves offshore. Corporations can. And that's who the people running offshore banks or data services cater to.

      What FATCA is achieving is that many non-US financial institutions are turning away customers who are US citizens; they won't have their money, don't want their custom. And many of these US citizens are giving up their US citizenship because of this. There are millions of US citizens around the world who are experiencing this financial blacklisting because of FATCA, especially in the EU.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    19. Re: DoS? by inflamed · · Score: 1

      The effect will hopefully be for users to make their own damn vpn (really, it's not hard) and stop trusting third parties for things that should be confidential.

      Setting up your own VPN isn't going to fix a thing. Whether you establish your credentials in plaintext or encrypted, there is a MiTM vector for capturing those credentials - unless you're moving data by sneakernet.

    20. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly makes you think the NSA would have any incentive to do a better job than the existing producers? My guess would be the NSA's products would be *worse*. They don't need you to trust them. They don't need to turn a profit. Things are easier for them if you shit is not secured. And they don't give a damn if anyone else reads your traffic. Exactly what incentive would they have to make things secure?

      The NSA is the premiere writer of security guides for networking equipment. They give this information away for free and their work is quite thorough. These documents were (and as far as I know still are) the best of the best bar none for many years. Very impressive stuff. I recommend a look as no one else has come close to this sort of work. All the fancy postgrad papers and guides by huge international companies read like summaries of these things, never actually managing to add anything.

      One caveat though, after many revisions it appears they stopped updating it (publicly anyway) in 2005, just before the time all this domestic spying stuff really kicked off. Interesting yeah?

    21. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. They're watching anyway, so I'd agree they'd do well to license it for securing us (USA). Thing is though, I doubt they want the responsibility of botched firmware and people reverse engineering each release to find the definite backdoor.

      Of course, arguably backdoor'd firmware is, I suppose, botched from a security perspective.

      I trust THEM, just not somebody malicious who finds out what they did for their access.

    22. Re: DoS? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So, how do I make a VPN from England to the US (a common use of these is Netflix/Hulu from outside the US)? Buy a server? A server instance? And what do you recommend for a seamless SSL-web based proxy-like VPN to avoid clients and enable communication to the VPN from almost anywhere (even iDevices, or other tablets)?

      Paying someone a trivial amount of money to take care of the details and just hand off a usable service is a useful service to many.

    23. Re:DoS? by LavouraArcaica · · Score: 1

      there is a concept called 'informational asymmetry'. When you have a big IA, you cannot have well done system of agency (like the theory of agency).
      So, if you have a big gap between who votes and who gets votes, you cannot have a real democracy. That's plain and simple.

    24. Re:DoS? by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      It SHOULD force you onto servers where you alone hold the key to your data, which is the only way to do business in the first place.

    25. Re: DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was my exact thought! It's too simple a solution. We can't break legimatly hard private encrypted comm's, so well put ourselves, the NSA, above the law. Those who dare continue as a secure provider, are now in a compromised position both legally, monetarily, and technically. Only resolution? Close up shop.

      The upside for the NSA, is then more dollars for spying on foreign security company comm's, which they've essentially created for themselves.

      It's quite th self-fulfilling situation.

    26. Re: DoS? by xvan · · Score: 1

      Thats not true: diffie hellman for key generation + asymmetric encryption and TRUSTED certificates for authentication should keep you safe for typical MiTM.
      As long as P=NP isn't solved, and the is no bug in the encryption implementation, you should be fine. You can always use keys of length proportional to your information value.
      Of course the NSA leaks revealed what everybody knew: They don't need to MiTM, they just put themselves on the other side of the communication and fuck you...
      Foreign trusted servers from non NSA friendly countries should be safe (as long as you don't think that all the OS's and typical VPN implementations have NSA backdoors...)

      This type of services would be a great opportunity business for Cuba if they had the proper infrastructure. I can't think of a country less dangerous and more US unfriendly than Cuba.

    27. Re:DoS? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      parliamentary it may be.

      but democratic? the voters don't know the rules nor are the allowed to know the actions taken under those rules so how could it be democratic?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    28. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The effect of this is to remove secure competitors from the market and force users onto pre-compromised services.

      I know this is going to sound mighty odd, but hear me out...

      I kind of wish the NSA sold things like consumer routers, for which they wrote all the firmware, user interface, etc.

      The NSA employs Really Ridiculously Smart People, so then I could count on my router being really, really secure against everyone and everything... except the NSA.

      Which would be an OK trade-off for me, and I think would be an OK trade-off for a lot of people...

      Why, so it becomes the NSA buying and selling your data to the highest bidder rather than Facebook doing it?

      Oh, I'm sorry, that's right. That would never happen once a single entity controls that multi-trillion dollar database, right? I forgot, the US government is clearly flush with cash, and has no financial issues whatsoever...

    29. Re:DoS? by WeeBit · · Score: 1

      The NSA/Gov will just get them blacklisted. See the Search engines do a good job when they have too.

    30. Re:DoS? by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      A contractor with questionable work history walked off with a mountain of classified data he never should have had access to, and no one knew what was going on until the press release. Why do you trust their security so much?

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    31. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FATCA? Got a nice ring to it:

      American, FAKYA!

    32. Re:DoS? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Right. And with similar legislation, non-US ISPs will turn away US citizens. No off-shore e-mail accounts or servers. In fact, you might have trouble connecting to WiFi at a European hotel if the NSA has the power to dig through the records of anyone dealing with Americans' data.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    33. Re:DoS? by m.alessandrini · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In Italy we call that "mafia". That is, paying criminals against your will, to protect you from themselves and other bad guys.

    34. Re:DoS? by m.alessandrini · · Score: 2

      Which would be an OK trade-off for me, and I think would be an OK trade-off for a lot of people...

      Until the day you want to leave a comment on some sites criticizing your last govermnent law, or visiting an opposing political party site, or (just to be informed and not to do something wrong) searching google for security systems on planes, or lock-picking, or Hitler's book, etc, etc, etc.... Then you would feel that fuzzy feeling of someone observing you.

    35. Re:DoS? by Hypotensive · · Score: 1

      many of these US citizens are giving up their US citizenship because of this.

      That, and the fact that the IRS is attempting to tax them twice on the same income: even when they can show that they've paid income tax in the nation the income was generated, they claim that they're due income tax in the US as well due to you being an American citizen.

    36. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone on slashdot most likely already runs their own home-made router.

      Hahahahahaha. Oh boy. You really think that?

    37. Re:DoS? by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      Yes, they do employ Really Ridiculously Smart People. But unfortunately, those aren't the People In Charge.

    38. Re:DoS? by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      The NSA employs Really Ridiculously Smart People

      Don't be too sure of it. A lot of "smartness" of spies is manufactured by the media - http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/posts/BUGGER

      It doesn't take much smartness to warn people of dire consequences if they don't turn over their keys, and then spy using thus acquired keys. There might be a few smart people, but possibly no more than those working for NetGear, or Cisco. And the said smart people obviously don't call the shots - otherwise Snowden wouldn't have happened.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    39. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Il pizzo!

    40. Re:DoS? by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      I lived in Germany for a couple years around 2000 doing study abroad and later working there. I had a German Bank Account still with Deustche bank that I recently had to close. It hadn't been that active in the past few years. I had about 15,000 Euro in it back when the exchange rate was about 1 to 1 USD to EURO. I transferred most of it back when it reached 1.6 USD to Euro a few years ago but I kept a balance of between 500 - 1000 Euro in there. I had a working ATM card that I'd go to a Bank of America branch once a month and get out 100USD. Then once a year I'd wire $1,000 or if I was going over on a business trip I might wire more before hand.

      But due to FATCA they wanted me to close the account. So I had them close it and wire the remaining balance to US checking account.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    41. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would trust the NSA's security guys to get security better than any for-profit company with strong economic incentive to cut corners.

      They also have a strong economic incentive to avoid class-action lawsuits, but the NSA does not.

    42. Re:DoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I kind of wish the NSA sold things like consumer routers, for which they wrote all the firmware, user interface, etc.

      The NSA employs Really Ridiculously Smart People, so then I could count on my router being really, really secure against everyone and everything... except the NSA.

      Which would be an OK trade-off for me, and I think would be an OK trade-off for a lot of people...

      "He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither." --Benjamin Franklin

  7. Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We've got technology businesses shutting down their services because they are now afraid of (i.e.: terrorized by) their own government?
    Did the terrorists actually win this war on terror?

    1. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've got technology businesses shutting down their services because they are now afraid of (i.e.: terrorized by) their own government? Did the terrorists actually win this war on terror?

      2001 called, it wants its towers back, too.

    2. Re:Sad by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Won this war, and started this war.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    3. Re:Sad by adolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We've got technology businesses shutting down their services because they are now afraid of (i.e.: terrorized by) their own government?
      Did the terrorists actually win this war on terror?

      The terrorists won as soon as we had to take off our shoes and throw away our nail files in order to get on an airplane, starting around 12 years ago.

      It's been an easy slide down the slippery slope since then.

    4. Re:Sad by jschrod · · Score: 1

      Did the terrorists actually win this war on terror?

      Yes, for sure, in the USA they did. It was a full-fledged, all-around victory, without any substantial opposition. That the terrorist's victory also helped companies like Halliburton to enormous profits was not inconvenient, either. Haven't you left your mother's basement in the last 13 years?

      --

      Joachim

      People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

    5. Re:Sad by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      We've got technology businesses shutting down their services because they are now afraid of (i.e.: terrorized by) their own government?
      Did the terrorists actually win this war on terror?

      No. The problem is that some business what to hold themselves above the law and find that it is very expensive to attempt to do that, and almost certain to fail.

      It looks like they didn't shut down because of "terror" but because they didn't want to comply with court orders and didn't have the money to fight a losing battle.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    6. Re:Sad by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      The terrorists won as soon as we had to take off our shoes and throw away our nail files in order to get on an airplane, starting around 12 years ago.

      Did that prevent you from getting on the plane? If not, then no.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    7. Re:Sad by adolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't matter if I still fly or not.

      One used to be able to board an airplane without a pat down, porno-scan, or a strip-search. One cannot do that now, because we've been terrorized into requiring these procedures.

      That's a win.

    8. Re:Sad by Urza9814 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It looks like they didn't shut down because of "terror" but because they didn't want to comply with court orders and didn't have the money to fight a losing battle.

      It doesn't matter what Congress or the courts say; if the law violates the US Constitution, it is illegal and invalid. Which makes the agents enforcing it part of an organized criminal enterprise. An organized criminal enterprise which has just caused numerous US businesses to close their doors by using tactics intended to produce a state of fear in those businesses. Sounds like the freakin' definition of terrorism to me.

    9. Re:Sad by couchslug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Did the terrorists actually win this war on terror?"

      Yes, but there were multiple winners.

      AQ inflicted trivial numbers of casualties compared to conventional wars, did that with minimal assets and personnel, and triggered/excused the US elites doing what they'd been working at anyway. The team damaged the US + world.

      The terrorists won by getting their adversary to make toxic structural changes, and the elites won by obtaining the excuse to make those changes! The American public and other Star Trek Red Shirts of the world lost. AQ and the Elites can both claim victory BUT also claim the battle is not over. Obvious to see where this will go...

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    10. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Washington and pals beat the British the same way. It works, and eventually the terrorists become the heroes.

    11. Re:Sad by cold+fjord · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So if the courts, the executive branch, and the legislature all agree with an interpretation of the Constitution that is different than what you think it is, how do you think that is going to get resolved in your favor? And beyond that, what is it about your ideas on the Constitution that should override the views of the three branches of government, not to mention that of legal scholars in the law schools that are likely to agree? Is something tyranny just because you say so even if almost everyone else disagrees?

      So far it appears that only a couple of businesses have closed. One because it apparently made promises that it really couldn't keep legally (and toyed with the court along the way which really upped their problem) and this one that appears to have shut down because it had tiny profit margins and wanted to act in a way that would result in a big and expensive legal battle.

      If you are thinking a revolution is going to occur based on situations like this, I think you're wrong. You might be able to get the law changed, but you will have a lot of work to do.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    12. Re:Sad by jareth-0205 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The terrorists won as soon as we had to take off our shoes and throw away our nail files in order to get on an airplane, starting around 12 years ago.

      Did that prevent you from getting on the plane? If not, then no.

      Your measure for loss-of-freedom is pretty high. I mean, let's say we got to a state where there is mandatory papers checks for every citizen on their daily commute. Does that stop them from going to work... probably not. Is it a loss, obviously yes.

    13. Re:Sad by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      If the terrorists "won," then it happened decades ago, during the problems with Palestinian hijackings, and hijackings to Cuba in the 1960s and 1970s. Various security measures were put in place at that time, including metal detectors, and armed guards with machine pistols at many European airports. Then the terrorists apparently inexplicably lost, and the measures become lighter, and then heavier, and then lighter, and now heavier again.

      The current security procedures that not that onerous, and people continue to fly despite them. If you think the terrorist goal is to make everyone arrive an hour earlier at the airport and walk through a metal detector, you fundamentally misunderstand their goals. Maybe you should read this for a start:

      The Future of Terrorism: What al-Qaida Really Wants
       

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    14. Re:Sad by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      If the big loss here is that people have to get to the airport an hour earlier and walk through a metal detector, as they have had to do during many periods in the past, that isn't much of a loss. It is also unrelated to the terrorist's goals.

      The Future of Terrorism: What al-Qaida Really Wants

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    15. Re:Sad by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Oh of course I don't expect a freakin' revolution because some crypto company had to shut down. Nobody cares. Nobody will ever care. I was merely pointing out that -- despite Nixon's opinion to the contrary -- just because the government does it does not automatically make it legal.

    16. Re:Sad by Falconhell · · Score: 0

      You don't need to read the posts, just see the name cold fjord and you know it will be lies and rubbish

    17. Re:Sad by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I flew twice in 2000 and had to take my shoes off for screening both times.

    18. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if the courts, the executive branch, and the legislature all agree with an interpretation of the Constitution that is different than what you think it is

      The constitution is a plain language contract that binds citizens and the government together. It is an agreement of power that the people secede to the government in return for government services.

      The government does not get to reinterpret and change the definitions of words in the contract after it has already been signed; that requires a referendum. Strangely, I do not recall there being any referendums recently... and yet the courts somehow decided that broad obscure interpretations that increase government power instead of narrow obvious interpretations that preserve the existing level of power was the best way to approach things. This is despotism.

    19. Re:Sad by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      it prevents me from voluntarily getting on a plane, yes.

      I choose not to fly. have not flown in over 10 yrs. by choice.

      when things get better (IF they get better), I'll reconsider. otherwise, its only true emergencies that cause me to even consider buying a plane ticket.

      air travel is horrible now (by all accounts). I remember when it was at least tolerable.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    20. Re:Sad by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      keep licking those boots, fjord.

      yes, the terrorists did win. people like you keep denying it. why is that?

      you have some agenda and I'm not sure I like it, to be honest.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    21. Re:Sad by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      its FEAR. that's what is at the heart of terrorism.

      and you are put in a state of fear and kept there by the TSA. if you make a joke, they can fuck with you, in a bad way. that's fear. if you have a name collision with someone who is on a no-fly, you are also put thru a world of hurt. that's fear.

      you don't dare question the air flight attendants. that's fear.

      you follow orders and don't fight back. that's fear.

      its all terrorism and its state sponsored. US states, that is.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    22. Re:Sad by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      So if the courts, the executive branch, and the legislature all agree with an interpretation of the Constitution that is different than what you think it is, how do you think that is going to get resolved in your favor?

      a while ago, it used to be legal to own slaves.

      get my point, there, fjord, old boy?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    23. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter what Congress or the courts say; if the law violates the US Constitution, it is illegal and invalid.

      Untrue in practice and in principle. The Constitution is not there to list God-given rights. It is there to set up the government.

      The main objective of a constitution is to prevent a civil war. At that, the United States Constitution has been moderately successful.

    24. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They fondle grandmas and small kids.
      Yes, they're 'that bad'

    25. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's tyranny when enough people agree about it. The only way to make it better at that point is to actually take up arms.

    26. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current security procedures that not that onerous, and people continue to fly despite them. If you think the terrorist goal is to make everyone arrive an hour earlier at the airport and walk through a metal detector, you fundamentally misunderstand their goals.

      They've got you irradiating your people with backscatter x-ray radiation and calling it "not that onerous", and your government are allowing them too because they want to sacrifice people's rights in order to maintain and increase power. I would say only the least rational terrorist would be foolish enough to provide evidence that this is all theatre when they can sit back, relax and let your government and yourselves do their dirty work.

    27. Re:Sad by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      I thought the Supreme Court was the constitutional court in the US? It's only illegal if they say so (and they should say so if and when the constitution says so).

      Innocent until proven guilty and all that. Members of the NSA will be considered organised criminals as soon as the SC says they are. And good luck holding your breath for that one.

    28. Re:Sad by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

      I don't know your Constitution, but I guess it's written in plain and clear english, as its purpose is just to set principles to be understood clearly and without doubt.

    29. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even AC says you Sir are an IDIOT!

    30. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's legal by the virtue that the US courts have not ruled it illegal. It's assumed that all laws passed by congress are inherently legal until the people or the courts take responsibility to get the law changed or removed.

    31. Re:Sad by jittles · · Score: 1

      . If you think the terrorist goal is to make everyone arrive an hour earlier at the airport and walk through a metal detector, you fundamentally misunderstand their goals.

      They are doing a good job of getting us to destroy our own constitution. Not to mention the fact that we've spent $5B on body scanners that provide absolutely nothing but security theater. We will bankrupt our country with all this stupid crap we're doing. And our presence in Iraq and Afghanistan (plus drone strikes all over the Middle East) is not improving their opinion of us. The result is likely more radicals who hate the US while our debt increases drastically. I'd consider that a winning position for these people.

    32. Re:Sad by intermodal · · Score: 2

      The terrorists never had anything to do with it. Terrorism was just the government's excuse to do what they've always wanted to do.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    33. Re:Sad by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

      The United States is now Officially a Turd World Country being ruled by a Turd World Dictator.

      NONE of this is legal by the highest laws of our Republic. But we aren't a Republic anymore.

      --
      Corporatism != Free Market
    34. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter what Congress or the courts say; if the law violates the US Constitution, it is illegal and invalid. Which makes the agents enforcing it part of an organized criminal enterprise. An organized criminal enterprise which has just caused numerous US businesses to close their doors by using tactics intended to produce a state of fear in those businesses. Sounds like the freakin' definition of terrorism to me.

      Ah, but the beauty is that it is paid for by the terror victims. The U.S. government is the gold standard for organized crime.

    35. Re:Sad by fnj · · Score: 1

      The constitution is not something for the elite to warp beyond recognition to further their imperial design. Unlike the manure now being produced by congress, signed by the president, and elaborately shored up by nine cloistered, aloof old men, the constitution is written in plain language, to be understood by anyone of reasonable intelligence, and appreciated by anyone of reasonably advanced devotion to liberty.

      If congress, the president, and the supreme court all agree that things which are clearly unconstitutional are just fine and cannot be contested by the people whom they serve, that says nothing whatsoever about the constitutionality of those things, and everything about the evil, tyranny, and brazen corruption of those particular mortals. Every one of them who is a party to continual and pervasive violation of the constitution is a traitor to the nation and should be dealt with decisively.

      If one believes that the constitution is dated, there has from the beginning existed a method to deal with that. It is called amendment, and has been used over the years to rectify several shortcomings, accomplish several questionable changes, and put in place at least three detestable impositions (the 16th, 17th, and 18th amendments). But those drunk on power who are openly defying the constitution every day in our time disdain this mechanism, and instead simply proclaim that the emperor is not naked, but instead is wearing a new suit of clothes that common people cannot see.

      The subject of this article is one small part of a vast conspiracy. A revolution of one sort or another may happen, but it will be based on the entire conspiracy, not merely the shutdown of a single VPN service merely for enabling privacy. In view of the stupidity of the bulk of the electorate, who are so easily manipulated and continue to elect the same old tyrants time after time, when polls demonstrate they detest the result - in view of this, I am not entirely sanguine. But on the other hand, and unlike some, I don't revel in giving up hope.

    36. Re:Sad by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      No. The problem is when the law is unethical. Do you comply and break your personal ethics, fail to comply and continue operating, opening yourself up to liability, or close?

    37. Re:Sad by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      You bet your ass they won. Bin Laden's intellect in asymmetrical warfare was the real middle-eastern WMD, and he Hiroshima'd the hell out of the US with it.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    38. Re:Sad by adolf · · Score: 1

      Wait, do you mean: The more that we piss them off by fucking with them, the more likely they are to be angry and vengeful, or do you mean that by way of our loss of freedoms that they've already won? Or both?

      In any case, PLEASE STOP MAKING SENSE.

      K, thx.

      -constituent.

  8. No, it makes you a pro-democracy dissident. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why I always clear communication with my family and the world with the NSA first.

  9. time for internet++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's time for a new internet, with strong anonymity and encryption built in at a very low level, resistant to subversion, censorship, and snooping. Identity should be disclosed only voluntarily, and not easily "leaked" by things like panotoclick attacks.

    I believe it's technically possible. The question is whether we have the will.

    1. Re:time for internet++ by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      That's existed for over a decade, but nobody wants to use it:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freenet

    2. Re:time for internet++ by kermidge · · Score: 1

      That's well and good but while it's OK to use existing infrastructure, such may not be reliable.

      Mesh takes one just so far; hopping across an ocean is non-trivial. With bulk of traffic now done via fibre, piggy-backing on satellite channels is easily noticeable for any appreciable amount of traffic as well. One is left with trying to be unnoticed over existing fibre channels and maintaining unfettered access thereto. Not saying it can't be done (I don't have the tech chops to know, either way), saying it might not be so easy.

  10. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    >NOT beat his keys out of him

    Are you telling me TV has lied to me ALL this time?

    This... this changes everything. My entire life needs to be re-evaluated.

  11. anyone anywhere by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For anyone operating a VPN mail or other communications in any country you should consider that your government can compel you to produce information.

    This intellectual exercise has been done a long time ago by those who looked a little deeper than you. It's why there were crazy ideas such as offshore data havens.

    In the end, you can't really do anything about it. The government your company is under (at the very least, maybe other entities too) can compel you. So now it's just a matter of which government you're least worried about.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:anyone anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure you can - you just need several emp devices ;-)

    2. Re:anyone anywhere by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      For anyone operating a VPN mail or other communications in any country you should consider that your government can compel you to produce information.

      True. Is anyone here old enough to remember anon.penet.fi?

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    3. Re:anyone anywhere by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      In the end, you can't really do anything about it. The government your company is under (at the very least, maybe other entities too) can compel you. So now it's just a matter of which government you're least worried about.

      In the end the problem is bigger than that. The government of the countries you do business in can tell you to do certain things too, as many Europeans are fond of pointing out to Americans.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:anyone anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Compel" just doesn't seem to adequately describe physical aggression.

    5. Re:anyone anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > True. Is anyone here old enough to remember anon.penet.fi?

      That wasn't a very good system. The mixmaster remailers that followed its shutdown were a significant improvement, but there is still the issue of traffic analysis.

      I tracked down someone who used anon.penet.fi to email a death threat because they used our mail server to send the message to one of our other users and we didn't send a lot of messages to that service, so the candidate list of suspects was very short. (The threat was just harassment, not serious threat.)

    6. Re:anyone anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA has me too scared to login and not post as AC (and mod you up), but wow...you gave me chills with that bit of nostalgia...anon.penet.fi...thank you for that memory.

    7. Re:anyone anywhere by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      they got a short circuit on their e-meter, right?

      (no, I'm not fully serious. yes, I remember that service. GOML.)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re:anyone anywhere by julf · · Score: 1

      Is anyone here old enough to remember anon.penet.fi?

      Yes :)

    9. Re:anyone anywhere by johanw · · Score: 1

      anon.penet.fi was also put affline due to American pressure: the scientology cult bribed some senator to pressure Finland into obedience.

      Of course this played in a time when anonymizing services were not as advanced as they are now, email traffic was much lower and the idea of throwaway single-use email addresses was unheard of.

    10. Re:anyone anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the end, you can't really do anything about it. The government your company is under (at the very least, maybe other entities too) can compel you. So now it's just a matter of which government you're least worried about.

      Depending on what your company does, another option is to start a Tor site and operate anonymously. Governments can't compel you if they can't find you. The Silk Road proved that while not easy (he got caught), it is possible (took 2 years). This underground economy is still in its infancy, but it's a start.

  12. Until a libertarian is in office, we may never see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until a libertarian is in office, we may never see encrypted boobies on the internet ever again. That's a real shame since seeing a libertarian in office is as likely as us going to the moon again. :(

  13. Restricting trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't free trade the mantra of our political system? Seems all this NSA information gathering is actually causing restrictions to free trade. Could be a problem for the corporate cronies in DC and then ultimately a problem for the NSA.

    1. Re:Restricting trade by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Ain't no such thing as free trade, only a set of restrictions against what is declared to be non-free, and a set of privileges for those who subscribe to a given set of rules. The original notion was not so bad - from examples back in the 1800's where countries mutually removed tariffs, for instance.

      There is no free market, likewise; a minor example being Tesla in Texas. (And when I refer to free-market I don't include such gov't regs that act to help insure a level playing field viz. monopoly or interstate trade, or restrict adulteration of food stuffs and the like. A true free market would be outlaw, as Silk Road was in a minor way, or even as some of things Heinlein referred to.)

  14. Full disclosure, or it's just an empty gesture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect that no significant change is likely to occur until many of the the recipients of the USA's totalitarianly named 'National Security Letters', instead of merely shutting down amid elliptical comments, defy their local laws and issue press releases stating clearly and in full what the government of the Land of The Free is attempting to coerce them into doing, and until they include in full the NSL and any other documents, etc., that were served upon them, in the dossier that is released to the world.

    Of course, any such heros would need to be sure there was NOTHING in their backgrounds, hard drives, or acquaintances to the n'th degree that could allow the Home of The Brave to paint them to Fox News as a paedo, druggie, terrorist, commie, and so forth; and, even then, be prepared to go through the court system the hard way for their principles.

    Shutting down small, random services that few have heard of, is little more than a real-life parody of the 'Suicide Squad' in the last scene of 'Life of Brian': "That showed 'em, eh?"

    Would the real Samuel Goldstein, please stand up.

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. Subjunctive Case by chiefloko · · Score: 1

    It seems all very fishy. Shut down your end user service, but keep corporate service going?

    Legal fees? You need not be a lawyer to write a letter (or not write a letter) or better yet, not sign for any Certified Return receipt mail.

    Most of these companies are leasing hardware...without any real office space. Let Uncle Sam do the leg work, find the data center; subpoena the data centers, so on and so forth.

    This reads to be...we aren't returning enough profit for our non-business class players, let's switch to corporate pricing and take it from there.

    It is very easy to say "No" to the government, the fight may be long and arduous but an attorney is not needed every step of the way.

    Hell, some 1 or 2L's would probably eat this sort of pro-bono work up to get written up in a law review.

    Better honey than vinegar.

    Dear NSA,

    Thank you for your correspondence. It is my understanding sitesomelegalprecident.
    If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at this email address; I do not accept US mail.

    I don't know? This all reads as profit farse.

    $.02

    1. Re:Subjunctive Case by gnoshi · · Score: 1

      I agree with the essence of what I think you are saying. Right now is an excellent time for companies in private e-mail, encryption provision, or any related area who are not seeing good returns on some part of their business to close it down (potentially without refunds, if paid), say 'Oh, I shut down because NSA', and ride a wave of good publicity.

      I'm not saying that was the case for Lavabit, or for Silent Circle Mail. Both of them are special cases, because not only did they hold the private keys but they held data at rest. Thus, getting the private key and forcing the provider to implement passphrase capture from the client was necessary to get the data that was at rest.
      This is simply not true of a VPN service. They don't have data at rest, and the NSA can (I expect...) use the current legal processes to collect the data directly from the VPN provider. They don't need the private keys of the customer to do that.

      Note: all this depends on my understanding of CryptoSeal being a VPN provider in the sense of 'VPN-from-home-to-CryptoSeal-to-Internets' rather than 'VPN-from-home-to-work-directly-using-CryptoSeal-software'. If I misunderstood that, then my argument about the NSA not needing the private keys falls apart a somewhat. (I did check their site but it seemed like a VPN-to-Internet service).

    2. Re:Subjunctive Case by chiefloko · · Score: 1

      I agree 110% with you and your eloquent statement on "Data at Rest"

      I am still not sure at the service that they offered. It reads that they did actually track usage and page visits? I wonder what big brother is doing about AnchorFree?

              When you register for CryptoSeal we ask for information such as your name, email address, billing address, credit card information. Members who sign up for the free account are not required to enter a credit card.
              CryptoSeal uses collected information for the following general purposes: products and services provision, billing, identification and authentication, services improvement, contact, and research.
              Cookies are required to use the CryptoSeal services.
              We use cookies to record current session information, but do not use permanent cookies. You are required to re-login to your CryptoSeal account after a certain period of time has elapsed to protect you against others accidentally accessing your account contents.
              CryptoSeal uses no third party vendors in the operation of its services. Datacenter partners are used for Power, HVAC, and Physical Security. Although CryptoSeal owns the code, databases, and all rights to the CryptoSeal services, you retain all rights to your data.
              CryptoSeal may disclose personally identifiable information under special circumstances, such as to comply with subpoenas or when your actions violate the Terms of Service.

    3. Re:Subjunctive Case by gnoshi · · Score: 1

      From the article at ArsTechnica:

      VPN services let consumers gain extra privacy and security while using the Internet. A user establishes an encrypted connection with a VPN service, routing all Internet traffic to the VPN before sending it on to the rest of the Internet.

      and

      "Our system does not support recording any of the information commonly requested in a pen register order, and it would be technically infeasible for us to add this in a prompt manner," CryptoSeal continued. "The consequence, being forced to turn over cryptographic keys to our entire system on the strength of a pen register order, is unreasonable in our opinion and likely unconstitutional. But until this matter is settled, we are unable to proceed with our service."

      So basically, they provide a VPN-to-Internet service, but do not record the data required for a pen register order. Based on the EFF information on pen registers, that would constitute connection data (i.e. incoming and outgoing connections - IP addressed, ports, etc, but not content of the connections).

      Without putting too fine a point on it, I'm dubious about CryptoSeal's claim that they can't do this. How would they enforce their terms of service? They may not, by default, collect this data but I would be surprised if they were not already set up to collect this data if they wanted to, for example to check if someone was abusing their service.
      Then again, I could be wrong. Still, it smells to me like a case of:
      1. Set up beta
      2. Get attention and goodwill through having free accounts, and get corporate sign-ups
      3. ?
      4. Profit!!!
      Where '?' = 'Shut down the free/low-cost service, blame the NSA, and ride the wave of solidarity and support'

    4. Re:Subjunctive Case by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      So basically, they provide a VPN-to-Internet service, but do not record the data required for a pen register order. Based on the EFF information on pen registers, that would constitute connection data (i.e. incoming and outgoing connections - IP addressed, ports, etc, but not content of the connections).

      The NSA already sees the data when it hits the internet, and the VPN "pen data" only provides some anonymity by making the NSA have to work a little to attribute the data to specific customers. Seeing how they managed to make attributions with bit-torrent, I doubt they have to work very hard.

      I agree this was more of a PR stunt than out of real concerns.

    5. Re:Subjunctive Case by gnoshi · · Score: 1

      As you say, it isn't always trivial to match VPN traffic to a user without a pen register order. Unless someone is practicing safe browsing, though, it is often trivial. If the user has logged into FB, Google and Twitter, and the traffic from the badges on what seems like half the sites on the net will identify them. Apart from that, there is also the users agent and plug-in details. Finally, there is traffic/timing correlation.

  17. NSA is tipping their hand by arthurpaliden · · Score: 2

    So the NSA is supposed to be covertly gathering intelligence. Yet they use high pressure tactics that force these sites to shut down therefore tipping off their users that something may be amiss. Leading them to change their procedures there by wasting all the time an effort the NSA put into thin initial investigation.

    1. Re:NSA is tipping their hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These sites shutting down is an unprecedented reaction.
      The NSA's not used to this at all. It's not like they could have anticipated it. Tech companies have been rolling over for decades.

  18. Re:Until a libertarian is in office, we may never by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tea Party-ers describe themselves as "libertarian".

  19. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by asmkm22 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The end result seems to be in line with general terrorism. Cause enough fear and confusion in your enemy until they change or give up.

  20. A different objective? by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe the US Government's objective here is not collect data from these types of services like LavaBit, SilentCircle or whoever else has shuttered in fears (or actual) of being tapped by the NSA.

    It's starting to feel like to me the objective isn't the data, the objective is the services. This is denial of service. Denial of crypto services by the US Govt.

    I just can't really see why they would put the pressure on so blatantly. It's like they're sending a clear message to all of us, no more crypto services, we're going to find you and tap you so you're are ineffective, or shut down.

    1. Re:A different objective? by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a side to this.. at least it tells us something...

      they can't break the crypto.

    2. Re:A different objective? by godlessgambler · · Score: 2

      Or perhaps LavaBit and this service are the rare exception and all of the others have complied. We read about the couple which make the news but how many others remain silent?

    3. Re:A different objective? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe that's exactly what they want you to think!

    4. Re:A different objective? by Jade_Wayfarer · · Score: 1

      Nope, there's a big difference between "can't" and "don't want to until there is no other option". It's just a path of the least resistance - why spend hours or even days on decrypting some messages when you can just write one letter, receive the keys and read everything anytime you want? But that doesn't mean that they don't have the means of breaking encryption if they really want to.

      --
      Absence of proof != proof of absence.
    5. Re:A different objective? by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 2

      I'm still leaning toward can't.

      I believe the very first post on this hit the nail on the head: NSA is supposed to be covertly gathering intelligence. Yes?

      And they're not doing it very covertly at all, in fact, it seems quite overt now. There must be a reason for this. I think the reason is, they cannot break the crypto. Well, better said, would be it's prohibitively costly to break the crypto, and you have to keep doing it again and again for every new key. Sooo, it's much easier to demand the keys. Leaves everyone with 3 options: Shut down, Don't comply and go to jail, or comply.

      Haven't heard of too many jailings yet over refusal to comply, so I'm assuming everyone is shutting down or complying.

      Fear is an incredibly powerful weapon and the NSA with their overtness at the moment is wielding it VERY effectively, scaring a lot of people to shut down, or get out of the US entirely. And personally.. I think that is their exact goal. Scare us, get us to abandon crypto or at least tap it all, shut down what wont be tapped.

      I wonder if the NSA has calculated the economic damaged they're inflicting on our own country with this insanity.

    6. Re:A different objective? by kermidge · · Score: 1

      "I wonder if the NSA has calculated the economic damage[d] they're inflicting on our own country with this insanity."

      Good question, leading to the first time I've ever used this: LOL.

      Unknown - in all respects. So far it's been restricted to a few small businesses shutting down, and a few contracts either canceled or under re-consideration. For all the talk and bluster going on here and overseas, there's not near enough data to go on yet. When there are lots of re-assignments of servers, hosting, contracts, then we'll have some info to work with. The multi-nationals, including most big banks and pharma, don't really have to care about any of this, they can just shuffle things around. Impact would be in aerospace, some other manufacturing, and info and consumer services that can't shift overseas.

  21. the gov't strategy is becoming clear.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    scare u.s. based companies into closing up shop or at least dropping products the gov't can't easily hack into.... which creates a void in the marketplace to be filled by overseas companies and services..... then the agencies with (u.s. granted) authorization for overseas operations can do whatever the fuck they want on foreign soil, and to those overseas companies and their services, out of the reach of the u.s. courts and scrutiny......

  22. Re:Until a libertarian is in office, we may never by Fjandr · · Score: 1

    And any of them who are socially conservative or who believe corporations have rights are not actually libertarian, much like Christians for War are not actually Christians.

  23. Blame every single NSA worker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Except Snowden - a true hero and patriot.

    Every single NSA worker has committed treason against the American people. I hope to see the day every single one of these individuals are exposed as traitors, for not only furthering a tyranny that is backed by big money , but totally subverting the constitution. Remember, your oath is to protect the constitution, not the federal government, or military industrial complex, or corporations.

    So collect your nice paycheck, but be a banker's bitch, you little little bitch. you spineless little coward bitch. I hope none of you can ever sleep at night.

    1. Re:Blame every single NSA worker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who could of ever imagined such a dark nightmare like this. Just when it couldn't possibly get worse, it does.

      What can you do??

    2. Re:Blame every single NSA worker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who could of ever imagined such a dark nightmare like this. Just when it couldn't possibly get worse, it does.

      What can you do??

      Hang the bastards? Or, barring direct access, place a .50BMG round from a Barret center-mass?

  24. Donate Here to Protect SSL Keys by Heretic2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Donate to Lavabit legal fund

    The legal briefs filed so far look like they are about to hand the government its own ass in respect to seizing SSL keys.

    1. Re:Donate Here to Protect SSL Keys by greenbird · · Score: 1

      look like they are about to hand the government its own ass in respect to seizing SSL keys.

      Never gonna happen. And neither you nor anyone else will ever know why. Cause, you know, national security all.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    2. Re:Donate Here to Protect SSL Keys by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      Donate to Lavabit legal fund

      The legal briefs filed so far look like they are about to hand the government its own ass in respect to seizing SSL keys.

      How so? The filing is only asking that the contempt charges be reversed, and the govt to turn over any SSL keys in their possession (like you trust them not to keep a copy?) They might get the contempt charge reversed, but I wouldn't expect any other sort of compensation. Setting a precedence that the original demand for the encryption keys was unlawful is about all they can hope for.

    3. Re:Donate Here to Protect SSL Keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The legal briefs filed so far look like they are about to hand the government its own ass in respect to seizing SSL keys.

      They mainly look like some people will disappear.

  25. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Old spies were Sean Connery. New spies are Daniel Craig.

  26. Re:Until a libertarian is in office, we may never by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    Tea Party-ers describe themselves as "libertarian".

    That Sarah Palin sure makes one sexy librarian though

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  27. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Back in the old spy days, the gentlemanly thing to do was crack the other guy's encryption, NOT beat his keys out of him. This is just cheating, pure and simple.

    Ah, since when is the NSA doing anything more than lifting a pen to impose a threat?

    And it's hardly a beating when providers are throwing their gloves down and walking out before the bell rings.

    And sure it's completely illegal under the Constitution. However, it's only cheating or illegal if you've actually got the power to stop it. Otherwise, their house, their rules.

  28. FISA endorsed NSA Activity? Wrong, it's not. by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    Okay, this whole synopsis is off base here. While CryptoSeal is shutting down it's over the ramifications of the Lavabit case...

    With immediate effect as of this notice, CryptoSeal Privacy, our consumer VPN service, is terminated. All cryptographic keys used in the operation of the service have been zerofilled, and while no logs were produced (by design) during operation of the service, all records created incidental to the operation of the service have been deleted to the best of our ability.

    Essentially, the service was created and operated under a certain understanding of current US law, and that understanding may not currently be valid. As we are a US company and comply fully with US law, but wish to protect the privacy of our users, it is impossible for us to continue offering the CryptoSeal Privacy consumer VPN product.

    Specifically, the Lavabit case, with filings released by Kevin Poulsen of Wired.com (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/801182-redacted-pleadings-exhibits-1-23.html) reveals a Government theory that if a pen register order is made on a provider, and the provider's systems do not readily facilitate full monitoring of pen register information and delivery to the Government in realtime, the Government can compel production of cryptographic keys via a warrant to support a government-provided pen trap device. Our system does not support recording any of the information commonly requested in a pen register order, and it would be technically infeasible for us to add this in a prompt manner. The consequence, being forced to turn over cryptographic keys to our entire system on the strength of a pen register order, is unreasonable in our opinion, and likely unconstitutional, but until this matter is settled, we are unable to proceed with our service.

    We encourage anyone interested in this issue to support Ladar Levison and Lavabit in their ongoing legal battle. Donations can be made at https://rally.org/lavabit We believe Lavabit is an excellent test case for this issue.

    We are actively investigating alternative technical ways to provide a consumer privacy VPN service in the future, in compliance with the law (even the Government's current interpretation of pen register orders and compelled key disclosure) without compromising user privacy, but do not have an estimated release date at this time.

    To our affected users: we are sincerely sorry for any inconvenience. For any users with positive account balances at the time of this action, we will provide 1 year subscriptions to a non-US VPN service of mutual selection, as well as a refund of your service balance, and free service for 1 year if/when we relaunch a consumer privacy VPN service. Thank you for your support, and we hope this will ease the inconvenience of our service terminating.

    For anyone operating a VPN, mail, or other communications provider in the US, we believe it would be prudent to evaluate whether a pen register order could be used to compel you to divulge SSL keys protecting message contents, and if so, to take appropriate action.

    What you have is a Federal Judge, the regular unleaded variety not the leaded FISA guys ordering that since Lavabit can't give the government what they're asking for, give us your SSL keys so we can go ahead and dig however we want with whatever traffic we choose to monitor or have already stored. It's an interesting legal theory and there's probably no precedent that the judge is going on, fully expecting an appeal to the decision to be made. Now, if only Groklaw were still around maybe we could get some better insight into this, but what you have here is an over-reaching federal, non FISA judge, using the powers that have been granted to compel for whatever information, property or testimony that is necessary to conduct the business of the court. In this case, Lavabit is what Cryptoseal is pointing to, not the fact that they're in a legal situation already but they believe that th

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  29. No Matter, I have Nothing to Hide by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    Right, now just wait until as a cost saving measure the NSA starts using 'advanced' software analysis programs to not only tag but also to vet all your emails and chats instead of people and then you end up automatically being put on a watch list.

    Now try to get off of it.

    That is the problem.

    1. Re:No Matter, I have Nothing to Hide by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      No fly list: where the government punishes you without you getting a trial, or a lawyer, or seeing the evidence against you, or being told what you are charged with. Are there any sections of the US constitution still followed?

    2. Re:No Matter, I have Nothing to Hide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that all NON Americans are already on the NSA watch list. All that is happening now, is that the few million Americans are also being slowly added to the watch list. Americans should welcome their new local overlords.

  30. Re:who is getting scared off? by unrtst · · Score: 2

    Not that many customers are going to be scared off. ...
    Businesses care about competitors reading their data, not the NSA.

    So customers aren't being scared off, but this business and other vpn providers are still shuttering their shops?

    I really don't understand why any of these companies are shutting their doors. They should just release a new statement, allow current members to get a refund on their remaining subscription if they want to leave, and acknowledge what has always been in their contract - they will comply with law enforcement demands and warrents as do all companies in the US that want to stay in business.

    This really sucks, and it should be more public**, and more people need to know about it, but boycotting in this fasion isn't going to help. If anything , it reduces the amount of money going into the hands of businesses that are on our side and could lobby.

    On top of it all, while I understand there is the threat of arrest, they DO have the option of not complying and not turning over the keys. They could even make it a well known statement that, if they are asked to do so, they'll destroy the related private keys and simply tell those asking that they no longer exist. Yes, that would be in violation of what they are supposedly maybe possibly going to be asked someday, but they can cross that bridge when they come to it. It does seem like a convenient exit plan if they've wanted to get out of the VPN business and existing contracts.

    I don't know what their usage stats are, but I wouldn't be surprised if the bulk of the traffic transitting their VPN service is for streaming video from sites that detect country of origin based on IP (ex. non-UK to UK BBC, non-US to US Hulu/Netflix, other provides like HBOgo etc), and for downloading stuffs from bittorrent and friends. That's probably expensive, and probably degrades the QoS of those that really need the service. The relevence of this is that it wouldn't shock me if the opperators were just tired of running it, and this was just the straw that broke the camels back, so to speak.

    AFAICT (please correct me if I'm wrong):
    * They weren't forced to shut down.
    * They didn't shut down because of an actual incident.
    * They supposedly shut down based on the idea that they may be threatened with such a demand in the future. (and it is a threat - comply and keep your mouth shut, or we'll put you in jail... has anyone called them on it, or even had a legit reason to do so?)

    ** or much much more private, like a spy org should be, with no info getting out, not even to other law enforcement agencies, much like I imagine they were before "NSA" was a well known acronym.

  31. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

    and what happen if you don't comply with a National Security Letter? How long can you disobey and defy the government before you are curbs stomped by the swat if your lucky or feds not read your Miranda rights and marched off to gitmo for enhanced torture^H^H^H^H^H^H^H I mean interrogation techniques and accused of aiding and abating the enemy and thrown in a government holding cell and if your lucky sentenced before a secret kangaroo court without legal representations.

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  32. What about the ones that DON'T shut down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a short time frame we have seen at least 3 security oriented communication sites voluntarily shut down rather than give customer data to the NSA. These are the good guys.

    What about the ones that are still open. My bet is that a significant number decided to bend over the barrel and let NSA drive.

    There is a significant chance that posting to this Slashdot topic is noticed by some bit of NSA code or other.

  33. question by WeeBit · · Score: 1

    What countries can the NSA not order you to hand over the keys to your encrypted files or servers? Is there a list?

    Just seems you just move your content to a server not residing in North America.

    Just asking cause everyone is discussing this but no one is posting good solutions.

    1. Re:question by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

      The problem is, almost every "western" country is kind of subjugated to USA, for their military and economic influence on the world, and tolerates their injustices.

  34. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    http://xkcd.com/538/

    Only works if you actually know the password.

    Don't remember the password, use a token like a USB flash key. If they take the laptop without the key then it's useless, if you smash the key then it's also useless.

    No, this won't stop them from torturing you anyway, but on the other hand, they might pick up the wrong person who didn't actually own the laptop and torture them instead. This is the great thing about torture: it's only useful to confirm what you already know, not to extract anything new; there's no way to tell if someone is lying because you haven't broken them yet or lying because they don't know anything but really want the pain to stop.

  35. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "This is just cheating, pure and simple."

    It is illegal, pure and simple.

    Since several crypto companies have in fact closed down, affecting thousands (at least) of people, we can come to some basic conclusions.

    First, we have proof that the NSA spying has had the effect of chilling otherwise legal, free speech.

    Second: we now have thousands of people who have provable legal standing to sue the government over it.

  36. Enough is Enough by ks*nut · · Score: 2

    The NSA is operating outside of its charter and heads need to roll. What's is really embarrasing about this mess is that other countries are (properly) telling the U.S. to knock it the fuck off. We need to go back to 9/12/2001 and restore the privacy and freedom portions of The Constitution before this country evolves into the most dangerous police state ever.

  37. Can't obtain the key when signed by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    You only submit your public key to the certificate authority (CA) to be signed. Your private key, required to decode the signal, never leaves your server.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  38. there is no benefit to offset it by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 3

    You have lost, because there is no benefit whatsoever to doing all this. The terrorists still attack all over the place and all these measures taken "to guard against terrorism" have zero net results. Sure, some incidental victories have been made, but nothing structurally beneficial has been achieved. Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt have been controlling the USA and 99% of all the money and trouble they have been going through, have been wasted on chasing ghosts. It's time to stop this, accept the fact that some religious idiots will sometimes manage to kill a few people every now and then. Staying out of trouble has proven far more effective to over 90% of countries than the USA way of dealing with this, maybe the USA should try that approach for a while. It's a whole lot cheaper and it hardly can be less effective than the current policy.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:there is no benefit to offset it by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that would require a healthy dose of fact-based reality on the part of the vote-pandering corporate whores in the national legislature. Note that it doesn't take even a majority of the members to act this way - just enough to prevent sensible repeal of draconian bullshit.

      Though it be contrary to prevailing opinion, it's mine that the majority of Congress' members are fairly ordinary people having a genuine desire to "serve" caught up in a reality distanced from constituents, flavored by privilege and power, who bumble through the business of legislating issues that are filtered by staff, subject to the institution's gamesmanship, amid the vagaries of sound-bite journalism which comprises their voters' opinions. For those actually trying to do a good job of it I have no envy.

      Then there are the zealots, and their supporters, of which I think there are too many. It's not that bigotry is unknown to me, than it is I find it so mind-boggling obtuse as to be beyond even my imaging how to deal with it.

      Given the scope and intrusiveness of the security theatre bullshit I find it hard to understand why people put up with it, unless it be that it affects people in inverse proportion to their privilege and that those with least have shit for brains. The general populace has rendered itself powerless in less than a generation.

  39. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by sconeu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First Lavabit.
    Then Groklaw.
    Now CryptoSeal.

    Who's next?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  40. Too late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    #1 prison population in the world; and with a moderate population density too!

    #1 military, #1 spy system (by size) and both are actively used.

    Secret tapping of citizens phones,etc with a massive cover up (seriously, does anybody believe them after all that they did when they say "it's only meta data?") Almost more surveillance than a classic police state (it's just missing your neighbors turning against you.)

    Uncivilized prison system (many but not all; but the society is taught to believe and accept the known conditions. The system keeps the public from knowing about the horrible things... such as 12 year olds in adult prison with their rapist's name carved into their skin, for example.)

    Self exempted from most international laws. Pre-emptive wars, bribing, blackmailing corrupting foreign governments...(wikileaks put that stuff on paper) Killing or arresting or persecuting anybody on earth without respect for laws / jurisdictions (doesn't matter what you do, if you go to a safe nation the idea was you were safe when sovereignty was respected... not that it was all that highly regarded; but it's just openly dismissed today.)

    Police in most schools; more coming. Children arrested and processed as criminals for being children --in school; handcuffs on 8 year olds. Teens executed as adults. Adults executed... just like in China and Iran do. Teens tweeting being prosecuted for bullying outside of school...

    People generally afraid to express a wide range of "controversial" opinions not on the unofficial acceptability list. Obama a Muslim? that is ok. Telling on the bankers? nothing, if you harm them, jail time (but perhaps a big IRS reward...for afterwards...)

    Every police state has two systems-- one to go soft on the elite and one for everybody else. We have that situation too.

    Right to Peaceable Assemble? Result? Beat downs, false incrimination and nobody really cares; you'd think nobody ever reads past "free press" and that the other one "bear arms"... whatever, pass me a beer.

    Free speech and free press? Allowed but rendered nearly ineffectual which is why those are allowed.

    1. Re:Too late. by fnj · · Score: 1

      Too late? I'm not buying into that cop out; that excuse for resignation.

      The USSR had the #1 gulag system. The USSR and East Germany had the #1 and #2 secret police systems.

      But it's not too late for them, because that got fixed. Anything can be fixed. Look, I know it's too late for me personally at my age to see this fixed, but it's never too late for the nation, no matter how deep the whole that has been dug for it.

    2. Re:Too late. by kermidge · · Score: 1

      I've long subscribed to the notion that whatever humans make they can un-make, re-make, build anew. But that requires a certain clarity of thought, desire, and will to do. I see none of those things in the present situation. I'd like to be wrong about that assessment. I might could live another five years, or thirty; with winning the lottery, perhaps much longer. But as they say, I'm not holding my breath. Yet even in the depth of late-night sad cynicism, I still hope for a pleasant surprise. Screwy, yes?

      "the whole that has been dug for it" - nice pun, no matter if unintentional

    3. Re:Too late. by fnj · · Score: 1

      Most definitely the resolution and involvement of the people is presently at an extremely low ebb. My judgement is that a reversal will most likely be a lengthy wait. But I could be wrong. Not many in 1985 foresaw that the USSR had only six years left.

    4. Re:Too late. by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Too true, on all counts.

      Funny, I figured that as I got older that I would maybe get a few things figured out, come up with some good advice for myself, but these days it mostly boils down to, "Be kind to one another."

      Meanwhile, good luck to us all.

  41. You question his judgement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I question his judgement because he talks about Europe as if it's one entity. He talks about Europe like it has a single communist government, when its member states have a large range of political leanings.

    Well, there's a bit of a conundrum right there: in a sensitive position like the top of a spy agency, you'd want a person with American values that come with an American education. How are you going to share American values if you can tell apart Newzealand and Turkey on a map of Europe?

  42. Despotism has always been the destination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Democracy always falls to Despotism. History. learn it.

  43. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by hax4bux · · Score: 1

    This is joke, right?

    Cracking is the last resort. If there is an easier method to compromise a system then that is the path to take.

    I read an interview w/the head of the GRU who flatly admitted they never cracked a high level US system. It wasn't necessary since they were able to purchase solutions.

  44. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

    And especially, it was against other countries, not against your own citizens.

  45. Don't do business with US companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We hear you loud and clear NSA, thank you.

  46. Users will start encrypt payload over open service by KlausKnegg · · Score: 1

    By using 1) open services (that are intercepted!), 2) protocols like pop/imap/smtp and 3) custom client programs - users can embed strong encrypted content as normal payload themselves, embed encrypted messages in embedded pictures etc. NSA can work as much they wish on this payload, there is no chance for them to get hold of the encryption keys users keep secret. They do not know the methods used, they do not know the keys. Sorry NSA, this is a loosing battle, you may catch a few dummies, the smart guys will always be ahead of you. Terrorist organisations that we would like to catch have resources to do this, the dummies don't. The dummies we can live with. NSA = Not Smart use of tAxpayers money? Klaus

  47. Re:who is getting scared off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * They weren't forced to shut down.
    * They didn't shut down because of an actual incident.
    * They supposedly shut down based on the idea that they may be threatened with such a demand in the future. (and it is a threat - comply and keep your mouth shut, or we'll put you in jail... has anyone called them on it, or even had a legit reason to do so?)

    That's one of the big problems. Because thay can't tell you don't know if they were served a gag order or not. If they were, their only two options are to comply or shut down. If they comply, you won't know. If they shut down, there is no way to know what reason they did it for. So it might be because of an actual incident.

  48. Wake up man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like it's high time time to start a VPN provider in SeaLand

    This, though maybe not in SeaLand.

    The first country that offers verifiably secure email and VPN services to the world will enjoy an economic boom and the love of billions. And if it's a country like Iceland, it could go a long way toward making them wealthy.

    It would go a long way into getting the country declared a terrorist state, and having it taken over by the US.

    In the case of SeaLand, they'd get boarded in the dead of night and people would be speculating for decades about whether they were taken by a rogue wave.

  49. I guess we'll have to live with that in the future by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

    But hey, then don't expect me to feel guilty if I download a movie!

  50. NSA steals data for Industrial Espionage by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 1

    That isn't really true [that data stolen by the NSA was used for commercial advantage of US companies.].

    I have noticed Cold Fjord and other related accounts jumping on this issue a few times now it must be a high priority agenda talking point: "Play down the industrial espionage implications of NSA spying scandal".

    Astroturfer Cold Fjord is well aware and has been repeatedly reminded that there is plenty of concrete examples showing that the data stolen by the NSA has, is and will be used for Industrial Espionage, it is not called USA Inc for nothing. (Here are just a few of the most well known cases). Despite this the account operator behind the Cold Fjord account continues time and again to convince us that this is not possible and ignores that these concrete examples exist. Sad really.

  51. Route around U.S.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because of the NSA, the Internet will eventually route around the U.S.A., just like freedom-loving travellers route around the U.S.A. because of Homeland Security. And business routes around the U.S.A. because of FATCA.

    Once the U.S.A. has closed down all real and virtual borders, they can enjoy their unique vision of freedom in their own Goddamn country. At least once all their drone strikes happen on U.S. soil as well.

  52. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is honorable to die for you country, even if it is in direct violation of its laws and lawmakers..

  53. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by thexfile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No internet based company should be headquartered in the US.

  54. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

    Die for your country, while fighting against your country???

  55. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

    It'll probably turn out that, with no evidence the government has stolen *your* data specifically, you have no legal standing.

  56. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by TheLink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fighting against your own government/leaders who are enemies of your country, is not the same as fighting against your country. It's still fighting for your country.

    To me it is more patriotic than killing people in some other country.

    If more people around the world did that sort of thing there would be much less need to kill people of other countries.

    That said I'm not a big fan of patriotism. Seems to cause more harm than good.

    --
  57. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by TheLink · · Score: 1

    The solution is if everyone had crypto whether they used it or not and things were set up so that you can't tell whether they used it or not. See also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/148440
    Or even better if everyone was using crypto (full disk crypto, vpns etc), but you can't tell whether they were using additional crypto- extra container file lying around by default).

    Then if those in power are still going to torture people even though there actually isn't anything (extra) to decrypt/unlock, your country is so screwed up you could be tortured for hundreds of other reasons anyway.

    --
  58. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

    That said I'm not a big fan of patriotism. Seems to cause more harm than good.

    Neither am I, because bad country rulers causing wars are never the ones risking their asses when wars start.

  59. Obvious... by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

    I really hope that people can see that some of these services were never financially stable much less solvent and that these companies are taking the NSA excuse to make a quick exit with their investor's remaining cash. Plus they get to say all that and move overseas and start the cycle of schyster business schemes with the added, "well now we have found a way to avoid the NSA..." line sold to investors.

    Seriously, they want us to believe that following all of the information dumps from Snowden et. al. that it is getting *harder* for these companies to negotiate with the NSA and *harder* to sell their services. Bullshit.

  60. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by TheLink · · Score: 1

    That's why I proposed this: http://slashdot.org/~TheLink/journal/208853

    But I know it is unlikely to happen :)

    --
  61. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

    It would be nice, but maybe a leader wanting to start a war has already won the internal war over his citizens.

  62. Re:who is getting scared off? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Since other services have shut down to prevent the NSA getting access it seems likely that in future they will try to pre-empt those attempts by going in with a requirement to keep the service running. Therefore if you run such a service and you don't want to be in a position where you are basically a slave who has to lie to your customers every day or go to jail and are not allowed to even seek your own legal advice you had better shut said service down first.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  63. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by flyneye · · Score: 1

    I still await the coming of the Uber-provider; who in a fit of patriotism, arms himself, locks himself in a building and calls the press to make a BIG public stink and flip public opinon to extreme anti-government.
    Let the revolution begin!

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  64. Do you think that subject any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or is it actually EVEN MORE braindead than subjects being in comments, which at least let you know if it's worth opening it up from the headline when browsing abbreviated comments to -1?

  65. This time, the U.S.A. is screwed for good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The internet was designed to survive a nuclear war, and the flame war going on because of the NSA surely counts as the next closest thing. Given that most of the "great" achievements of the USA were done by foreigners, I think it's time to import the next generation.

    They are already waiting in Guantanamo. Or did you think they'd come voluntarily to a country renowned for civil rights violations, racism, injustice (if you can't buy yourself a proper defense, you have to accept any "plea deal" or else), the highest absolute and relative incarceration rates in the world, and a disregard of science that culminates in pupils, teachers, and schools councils being able to claim God in his intelligent design permitted them to spit on science and spend the time earmarked for learning to diddling their rosaries?

    Why should anybody go to the U.S., the land of unfreedom that will detain you without due process indefinitely, grope you at airports, shoot at sight, has no democratic control and is rules by secret cabals without accountability?

    1. Re:This time, the U.S.A. is screwed for good by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Why should anybody go to the U.S., the land of unfreedom that will detain you without due process indefinitely, grope you at airports, shoot at sight, has no democratic control and is rules by secret cabals without accountability?

      As much as I hate it, this should be modded +5 Insightfull.

  66. We have the power to destroy them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What we need is for everyone to email their friends and family with terrorist keywords. Every one sends messages that will raise red flags at NSA. If everyone starts doing it then everyone will all end up on a terror list and it will become ineffective. Every internet citizen has the POWER! We can short circuit the system by over loading it. Every one start sending terrorist messages!

  67. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish someone would sue the NSA and the US Government and hopefully find a judge willing to uphold the constitution. Tossing Obama in a jail cell with some Arian Brotherhood members would be no worse than Club Gitmo where he merrily ships Muslims.

  68. Obama kills another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From drone strikes to constitutional breaches the tyrant Obama runs roughshod over people and undeterred by the liberals socialists feminists and Marxists that elected him. Apparently he can do no ills in their minds.

  69. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL. A good chuckle. But until and unless I become a covert CIA agent, or start making the money which would require me to truly hold data as secret from X... I think I'd much rather memorize the password and scream it out the second they bring out the lead pipe, rather than be tortured because I deliberately didn't memorize the information being looked for.

    And, as such, I recognize that this would be a really bad time for me to be working for any provider trying to offer encrypting services that the government cannot crack through any conventional means. Especially when little things, like the ability to keep feeding my family and facing the contempt charge of secret courts, are still tolerated by society.

  70. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by TheLink · · Score: 1

    That's fine. It's still much better than if he hasn't won them over.

    The referendum will prove it and will also help make things clearer for the defenders. Their consciences will be clearer when wiping out entire cities if most people in the attacking country want a war. If the whole country votes for war then they shouldn't complain if they get war.

    Plus with my way at least the leader has proved he believes the war is worth risking his _own_ life for. If he's not willing to risk his own life for it then why should others risk their own lives to kill OTHER people for his idea?

    --
  71. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, American people are coming to realization that it doesn’t agree with its government and needs to fight it to save its’ country. Same as in Egypt, Iran, Iraq and everywhere else where revolutions are now happening. Isn’t this ironic? Now, all of those posts on Facebook that you people were making innocently, will be used against you.

  72. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    Should Groklaw be put in a separate category? I thought it shut down mainly as a protest of the NSA (and also because groklaw's original goal of exposing SCO was finished.) Not because they had to shut down to protect anyone.

  73. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by sconeu · · Score: 2

    Read PJ's final post. She shut down as a direct result of the Lavabit situation.

    She relied heavily on email for communication with sources, and because she couldn't guarantee the security of her communications with them, shut down.

    Slashdot story: http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/08/20/0750237/.

    PJ's final Groklaw post: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20130818120421175.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  74. Not only offshore by phorm · · Score: 1

    But in general boycott U.S. products/infrastructure. Much like how the U.S. is supposedly avoiding Huawei, other countries will avoid U.S. hosting, and quite possibly technical equipment as alternatives become available (not to mention, working on their own alternatives). It's probably a good push for Linux/BSD/etc adoption too.

    The big thing is, there is *NO* going back now. Even if they the NSA et al ceased all the spying and backdoor crap today, nobody would believe them due to the terrible track-record of lies and false promises.

    1. Re:Not only offshore by SpaceManFlip · · Score: 1
      It's not necessary to fully abandon US infrastructure, but it will be necessary for people/companies inside the USA to start creating more secured endpoints. For example, it's not terribly hard to build an email server with free software, and then you just need DNS + MX records that will usually cost a little bit per year.

      So just build your own stuff, and build in encryption, and build a community of folks who you (in person by hand if necessary) share keys with etc.

      If you aren't the type to build your own stuff, well hopefully you can find someone trustworthy who is the type. We just need more of these.

  75. Secret Police by phorm · · Score: 1

    I'm fairly sure those exist already. Probably a combination of Homeland Security and the divisions of the NSA.

  76. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by WCMI92 · · Score: 2

    Government is inherently incompetent and lazy. Why do work when you can force people at gunpoint to make your job easy?

    Especially when you can throw people in jail for the "crime" of revealing that they MADE YOU do this.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  77. FIS is invalid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't recognize FISA. Nothing they say or do including gunpoint or prison will change that. If they ever send me "secret" orders, etc. it will immediately be scanned into an ENCRYPTED file, then the letter will be shreded.

    I will not keep it a secret, I will not comply.

  78. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Havokmon · · Score: 1
    First Lavabit.
    no No NO!

    Lavabit received a 'typical' court order for metadata information. He refused. It escalated to PenTrap devices because the FBI, by court order, is entitled to the information from that ONE ACCOUNT and Ladar refused to provide it. He created the problem, and shut his systems down because his actions forced the escalation to a wiretap.

    Nothing to do with the NSA's overreaching monitoring.

    But if you prefer the FBI to charge you with crimes without doing a through investigation, then go ahead and believe Ladar. He got himself in over his head, blamed the NSA, and now he's milking it for all it's worth. He's a douche.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  79. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    "It'll probably turn out that, with no evidence the government has stolen *your* data specifically, you have no legal standing."

    No, you misunderstand. Thousands of people are now provably harmed, and prevented from speaking freely in the manner of their choice, by the NSA surveillance. That is all that is necessary. It's a proven fact. A done deal.

    A government agency (per many, many prior SCOTUS decisions) may not take actions that chill free speech.

  80. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    "no No NO!"

    No, no, no yourself.

    Lavabit received a FISA court order, accompanied by a gag order. This is not a "typical" court order at all. One of the things he bemoaned in his public statement about the shutdown was that he was prevented from even speaking about the details. That is anything but "normal". It's the illegal FISA court.

    Second, "pen registers" are for telephones, not emails.

  81. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Havokmon · · Score: 1

    "no No NO!"

    No, no, no yourself. Lavabit received a FISA court order, accompanied by a gag order. This is not a "typical" court order at all. One of the things he bemoaned in his public statement about the shutdown was that he was prevented from even speaking about the details. That is anything but "normal". It's the illegal FISA court. Second, "pen registers" are for telephones, not emails.

    Read the documents. The gag order was to prevent the original account holder from becoming aware of the investigation. That's nothing more than Standard Procedure..

    What FISA Court? The original request, on page 1, was from the "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA" - according to Wikipedia there are no FISA members there.

    Did I mention my post in the original thread? I am an 'insider' - of sorts - with first hand knowledge of how these things progress. I was just as suspicious, until I read the document and saw exactly what happened. Unfortunately the 'media' fans the flames by only presenting the last document "We want SSL keys", and completely avoiding the fact that Ladar ignored first document "Please provide metadata for account x".

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  82. LETS START A LIST OF PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR THE NSA by BubbaDave · · Score: 1

    You know, just in case we need it. Soon.

  83. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    "Read the documents."

    Okay, I stand corrected. But this is WHY I made the mistake in the first place: gag orders are a hallmark of the FISA court. And they ALWAYS use the excuse of "keeping the subject from knowing about the investigation" as a justification, so that isn't an argument against it.

    But I do see that you were correct.

  84. Re:who is getting scared off? by unrtst · · Score: 1

    Therefore if you run such a service and you don't want to be in a position where you are basically a slave who has to lie to your customers every day or go to jail and are not allowed to even seek your own legal advice you had better shut said service down first.

    That applies to any and all businesses.
    This isn't about an actual threat. It's the boogyman. He may be real, and it may be proven that he has come after others, and he may come after you someday. Do you run and hide before you are ever even faced with the threat? WTF? If the mere thought of maybe being threatened with jail, not actually having the threat nor is jail guaranteed, but just the looming possibility that you may receive such a threat someday is enough to make you give up your livelyhood, don't expect me to feel bad for you.
    If there was an actual order sent to the company in question, then shutting their doors would almost certainly violate it just as much as deleting their keys. Regardless, they still have the option of fighting it, even if the paper they were handed says otherwise.

  85. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Havokmon · · Score: 1
    I hear ya. It's so easy to jump on the anti-NSA bandwagon with this. I feel like I'm screaming into the wind, there's so much misinformation out there about the Lavabit case from Ladar and the media - who are just being led by the nose by Ladar.

    Those documents are linked to at the bottom of a Wired article that seemingly pits David against Goliath. How is it that they can reference a source, and still not get the story right?

    Screw the 'Faux News' complainers, there is no media outlet that is reporting the real story here.

    It's a sad sad state of affairs.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  86. Re:Until a libertarian is in office, we may never by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

    And any of them who are socially conservative or who believe corporations have rights are not actually libertarian, much like Christians for War are not actually Christians.

    You can be socially conservative without believing that force is an appropriate means to prevent social change. Moreover, while corporations as such may not have rights, the individual shareholders who make up the corporation do, which amounts to much the same thing. Neither view is incompatible with being an "actual" libertarian.

    --
    "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  87. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only works if you actually know the password.

    Or, you know, if you just check it on the laptop in front of them.

  88. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by CitizenCain · · Score: 1

    That said I'm not a big fan of patriotism. Seems to cause more harm than good.

    What "good" do you see that patriotism causes?

    As far as I can tell, patriotism does about as much good as cancer. And causes more harm. At least cancer only kills people who get cancer.

  89. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by jwhitener · · Score: 1

    https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/pages/contact-us (Look under where you are located)
    https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/blog/2013/06/prism/

    We are located in the US. Being in the US is optimal for VPN Privacy services since the US is one of the few countries that does not have a mandatory data retention policy. Countries in the EU are forced to log, even though some claim they do not.

    True?

  90. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor, dumb bastard die for his country."
    ---the film Patton.

    You don't win by being thrown into gitmo you win by throwing out the peeping toms at the NSA and the power hungry politicians that fund them and the media that spread their FUD.

    The first step is to cripple the spying capabilities of the government spooks by using encrypted, obfuscated, anonymising, decentralised, and open services, like tor freenet, i2p, retroshare, GNUnet and others.

    The next step is to vote 3rd party, libertarian, green, just not one of the big two duopoly.

    the final step is to read the news on the internet not get your news form the big TV networks. fox is a joke, msnbc is just as biased but in the other direction, cnn gets their news off of twitter, and ABC is the sock puppet of mickey mouse.