Sorry for being on topic. I remember discussing this on/. and I'm still kinda surprised Hans actually did it. I still think it was a bad conviction, even if it randomly happened to have turned out to be correct. Kind of like the salem witch trial convictions were wrong, even if we somehow figured out one of them was a real live magical genuine witch after the fact (however unlikely that would be).
Yeah, it was so terrible that they had evidence rather than loony conspiracy theories like Hans and his defense attorneys were throwing out. He was not some person being prosecuted for being "weird" or other such nonsense that you defenders kept claiming. He was an emotional and physical abusive asshole who murdered his wife for having the 'audacity' to leave an abusive relationship. He deserves no sympathy.
Then if he can't raise it then he has no actual chance to win. If he really did poll 7% he could easily make the $50,000 even if only a fraction of those people donated.
That's great, but there requirement just said $50,000 in donations. It neither said nor implied that he needed to take corporate money. If he can't get $50,000 from people to donate to his campaign or get more than 10% in the polls he has no chance to win.
Yeah, but it has no bearing on this. This is a roundtable debate that is part of a show that would easily fall under "bona fide news interview" exemption to that rule.
In what way does that say or imply you needed to take corporate donations? You seem to have invented that out of whole cloth. Also there other reasons aren't "trumped up". They can choose who they do or do not want in their debate and it seems perfectly reasonably to only give the limited time to candidates that have even a modicum of a chance of winning.
Well of course it wouldn't be a derivative of Wine. You didn't link to any of the Wine code. Also, there is no GPL version to compile of Wine. It is strictly LGPL.
Basically, since you can't copyright the API itself, as long as you reimplement the API yourself such that your version is not a derivative work itself there are no copyright issues. Even if it ultimately ends up running against a GPLed implementation due to binary compatibility.
Well I was being some what wishy-washy in case someone wanted to point out that X empire was formed through unicorns and bunnies rather than to gain power and subjugate others.
Or the Muslim conquests of North Africa. There is nothing new or original about conquering others and using that as a method to force your culture, laws, ideas, etc. on others. We've been doing so for the better part of many millenia.
Apparently you didn't actually understand me. I never said they couldn't have released something with a bug. I said that there whole rapid release and hide the version numbers policy effectively causes more pain to users when they do make a mistake like this. They claim that version numbers don't matter but a fuck up like this reminds us that it DOES matter (because without knowing the version number or some sort of information how do I know what to revert to?) and now they've made a system that makes reverting a total pain in the ass.
Slashdot Mirror
Forgot? That implies the editors actually have the necessary skills TO proofread the submissions. That has yet to be proven.
Maybe it's the font of the Little Mermaid?
Because he's being punished for his heinous act. Boo-fucking-hoo.
Sorry for being on topic. I remember discussing this on /. and I'm still kinda surprised Hans actually did it. I still think it was a bad conviction, even if it randomly happened to have turned out to be correct. Kind of like the salem witch trial convictions were wrong, even if we somehow figured out one of them was a real live magical genuine witch after the fact (however unlikely that would be).
Yeah, it was so terrible that they had evidence rather than loony conspiracy theories like Hans and his defense attorneys were throwing out. He was not some person being prosecuted for being "weird" or other such nonsense that you defenders kept claiming. He was an emotional and physical abusive asshole who murdered his wife for having the 'audacity' to leave an abusive relationship. He deserves no sympathy.
No it was "the best" for a small segment of benchmarks.
Guaranteed? Based on what statutes or case law?
No, it wouldn't apply. You're being absurd.
How is taking meteorites off of US government lands considered "space mining". Since, you know, that's what this ruling was actually about.
No one is making any such claim of jurisdiction. You fell for a trollbait story submission. This was about meteorites on Earth not mining asteroids.
Because this ruling has to do with meteorites on US government land not asteroids?
This is about meteorites that have fallen to Earth. It has no bearing on space mining despite Soulskill's implication.
Then if he can't raise it then he has no actual chance to win. If he really did poll 7% he could easily make the $50,000 even if only a fraction of those people donated.
If he can't get $50,000 for his campaign he's not gonna win regardless of being let into this 30 minute show.
That's great, but there requirement just said $50,000 in donations. It neither said nor implied that he needed to take corporate money. If he can't get $50,000 from people to donate to his campaign or get more than 10% in the polls he has no chance to win.
Twist the election? They guy has no chance of winning. If he did he could have easily met their requirements for being part of the roundtable debate.
Yeah, but it has no bearing on this. This is a roundtable debate that is part of a show that would easily fall under "bona fide news interview" exemption to that rule.
You say there requirement is:
*Campaign contributions of at least $50,000
In what way does that say or imply you needed to take corporate donations? You seem to have invented that out of whole cloth. Also there other reasons aren't "trumped up". They can choose who they do or do not want in their debate and it seems perfectly reasonably to only give the limited time to candidates that have even a modicum of a chance of winning.
Well of course it wouldn't be a derivative of Wine. You didn't link to any of the Wine code. Also, there is no GPL version to compile of Wine. It is strictly LGPL.
Basically, since you can't copyright the API itself, as long as you reimplement the API yourself such that your version is not a derivative work itself there are no copyright issues. Even if it ultimately ends up running against a GPLed implementation due to binary compatibility.
and then the user can install the driver and use it with the GPLed kernel without violating the GPL.
The user of the driver wouldn't be violating the GPL no matter what. The GPL comes into play upon distribution not use.
Lane copout is lame. Fine, just look at the PRC and their conquests to for e their social ideals onto other countries.
Well I was being some what wishy-washy in case someone wanted to point out that X empire was formed through unicorns and bunnies rather than to gain power and subjugate others.
Or the Muslim conquests of North Africa. There is nothing new or original about conquering others and using that as a method to force your culture, laws, ideas, etc. on others. We've been doing so for the better part of many millenia.
And a well-written UI allows you to do batch processing and automation.
Make sure your next book is published by Packt. Then you'll be guaranteed at least an 8/10 review from Michael Ross.
Apparently you didn't actually understand me. I never said they couldn't have released something with a bug. I said that there whole rapid release and hide the version numbers policy effectively causes more pain to users when they do make a mistake like this. They claim that version numbers don't matter but a fuck up like this reminds us that it DOES matter (because without knowing the version number or some sort of information how do I know what to revert to?) and now they've made a system that makes reverting a total pain in the ass.