Slashdot Mirror


Reiser4 File System Still In Development

An anonymous reader writes "Reiser4 still hasn't been merged into the mainline Linux kernel, but it's still being worked on by a small group of developers following Hans Reiser being convicted for murdering his wife. Reiser4 was updated in September on SourceForge to work with the Linux 3.5 kernel and has been benchmarked against EXT4, Btrfs, XFS, and ReiserFS. Reiser4 loses out in most of the Linux file-system performance tests, has much stigma due to Hans Reiser, and Btrfs is surpassing it feature-wise, so does it have any future in Linux ahead?"

317 comments

  1. Rename it by concealment · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you can find any name that's not related to murdering your wife, go for it. Bonus points if it's catchy.

    1. Re:Rename it by Tukz · · Score: 5, Funny

      BundyFs4.

      --
      - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    2. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you can find any name that's not related to murdering your wife, go for it. Bonus points if it's catchy.

      My vote for MRDRFS.

    3. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you can find any name that's not related to murdering your wife, go for it. Bonus points if it's catchy.

      Blake fs? OJfs is pretty catchy.

    4. Re:Rename it by zig43 · · Score: 1

      KillerFS has a nice ring to it.

    5. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GNU/LinusFS2

      But hey, what's in a name?

    6. Re:Rename it by Atzanteol · · Score: 2

      THIS. At least rename the project FFS. Nobody would want " Ted Kaczynski FS" on their computer.

      Call it "rfs" or something if you want to keep some tie with the original.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    7. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      General Information Management Protocol ..... oh crap!

      Why does FOSS always get the catchy acronyms first?

    8. Re:Rename it by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      SausageFS is my suggestion. Immediately gives a professional impression.

    9. Re:Rename it by MikeBabcock · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're talking to people who can't find a spouse, they're totally in another world of reality. The shock of waking up next to a living, breathing woman every day would be enough to keep them in newlywed shock for 50 years.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    10. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LINUX! At least rename the project. Nobody would want "John Operating System" on their computer.

      Call it "LUX" or something if you want to keep some tie with the original.

    11. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No point. I mean Henry Ford was an anti-Semitic Nazi sympathizer, but they didn't change the company name because of that. Need to separate the person from the product.

    12. Re:Rename it by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      At least rename the project FFS

      Catchy name...

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    13. Re:Rename it by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Hah! Didn't even realize that. "FFS" wouldn't be a bad name. :-)

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    14. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFS is the Amiga Fast File System.

      The name has been used, but one might argue that it is no longer in use.

      -JaceFuse

    15. Re:Rename it by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      The shock of waking up next to a living, breathing woman every day

      Nothing a small needle can't fix...

    16. Re:Rename it by smittyoneeach · · Score: 3

      Murder, no. Wondering how awful a future apart from her would be, yes.
      Overall, the known negatives of separation outweigh the potential positives by orders of magnitude.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    17. Re:Rename it by metamatic · · Score: 2

      How about something with a nautical theme, like Shipman?

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    18. Re:Rename it by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      I am torn between 'metzger' and 'abattoir'.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    19. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFS is a BSD filesystem

    20. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MonkFS

    21. Re:Rename it by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      If you can find any name that's not related to murdering your wife, go for it.

      Take a page out of the Android playbook only instead of naming the releases after something sweet, name them after a man convicted of murdering his wife.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    22. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If I switch my wife Ubuntu laptop's filesystems to Reiser4, will I benefit from the special feature mentioned in the far right column? If so, I'll switch tonight...

    23. Re:Rename it by tobiasly · · Score: 5, Funny

      REDRUMFS. As long as you don't use it for mirroring, no one will know.

    24. Re:Rename it by Shark · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let me guess... She reads Slashdot and you're covering your ass?

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    25. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice one. I'd use it in an instant but I don't have a FB account so that may be why I have been using ReiserFS for a while :)

    26. Re:Rename it by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nothing quite as romantic as weighing the positives and negatives of murdering your spouse.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    27. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about OjFS or OzFS? - Of course 'O' stands for open.

    28. Re:Rename it by Sulphur · · Score: 2

      No point. I mean Henry Ford was an anti-Semitic Nazi sympathizer, but they didn't change the company name because of that. Need to separate the person from the product.

      Hans is that you?

    29. Re:Rename it by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      If you can find any name that's not related to murdering your wife, go for it.

      Take a page out of the Android playbook only instead of naming the releases after something sweet, name them after a man convicted of murdering his wife.

      So is O.J. in or out?

    30. Re:Rename it by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

      Following in the tradition of Unity Desktop, it should be renamed MaritalBlissFS.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    31. Re:Rename it by idontgno · · Score: 2

      Well, it's a touch more romantic if you, as a geek, don't dwell on the pragmatic negatives, like disposing of a body or covering effectively for the absence of someone that's been there for months or years.

      "That's right, Honeybunches. I don't kill you not because it'd be impractical or messy, but because I luuuurve you!"

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    32. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CUFFS

    33. Re:Rename it by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Funny

      As a man married for 5 years now I'd have to say no, no I haven't thought about murdering my wife.

    34. Re:Rename it by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      My data doesn't feel safe with a name like that.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    35. Re:Rename it by bipbop · · Score: 2

      Yeah. Who would trust someone who called themselves Mister Doctor?

    36. Re:Rename it by kasperd · · Score: 2

      At least rename the project FFS.

      Great idea. Both Amiga OS and BSD has a Fast File System, Linux needs one as well.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    37. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Henry Ford was an anti-Semitic Nazi sympathizer

      And Volkswagen was founded by Nazi Germany. But nobody is avoiding VW cars because of that.

    38. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gnaafs

    39. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a man married for 5 years now I'd have to say no, no I haven't thought about murdering my wife.

      Don't worry, she probably have that covered for you.

    40. Re:Rename it by flowlee · · Score: 1

      DexterFS.

    41. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seek help.

    42. Re:Rename it by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Posting to undo mismoderation.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    43. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My data doesn't feel safe with a name like that.

      Yeah, MRDRFS is so incomplete it won't even lay down its own metadata. You have to have SQWG.elf run in parallel to do that.

    44. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geek points dropped if you can't separate a filesystem from the actions of it's original author. Hell if the article hadn't shouted it out, again it wouldn't have been the first thing that popped into my mind. (thanks for that).

      This far on the only people who should give a shit are the people directly affected by the crime.

      Bad things happen, move on.

    45. Re:Rename it by Mass+Overkiller · · Score: 0

      RedrumFS FTW

    46. Re:Rename it by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, man, you guys kill me!

    47. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! Didn't even realize that. "FFS" wouldn't be a bad name. :-)

      Maybe not a good choice.

    48. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MordorFS, huh?

    49. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...yet

    50. Re:Rename it by hawguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Geek points dropped if you can't separate a filesystem from the actions of it's original author. Hell if the article hadn't shouted it out, again it wouldn't have been the first thing that popped into my mind. (thanks for that).

      This far on the only people who should give a shit are the people directly affected by the crime.

      Bad things happen, move on.

      Humanity points dropped if you can completely separate a software product from the actions of its original author - why help spread ReiserFS and give him the satisfaction of seeing his filesystem grow into one of the most popular Linux filesystems? I'd rather let him watch his brainchild die.

      Why is it ok for those who were directly affected by the crime to give a shit, but those of us who were appalled at the crime but not directly affected should just pretend it never happened?

    51. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....yet.

    52. Re:Rename it by tibit · · Score: 1

      No. I only need to leave her long enough in care of our university medical center and they'd gladly do the job, and bill me for it, too (I'm serious). If you or anyone honestly thinks of wanting to murder the spouse, it's time to get a divorce. Seriously. And do some lessons learned analysis to make sure you don't make the same mistake if there is to be a second time.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    53. Re:Rename it by tibit · · Score: 1

      At least someone who gets how things are supposed to be :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    54. Re:Rename it by quenda · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you can find any name that's not related to murdering your wife, go for it. Bonus points if it's catchy.

      I though they were changing it to "Open Journaling FileSystem".

    55. Re:Rename it by tibit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Either it's a decent codebase or it isn't. If it is, there's no point in wasting all that labor just because one of the authors is a murderer. It's like if you wanted to ban every murderer's memoir from distribution. It's a silly approach IMHO. Don't anthropomorphize the code. Your admission "I'd rather let him watch his brainchild die" is not a rational response at all. Personally, I'd much rather exploit the fruits of his labor if at all possible. That's a bit more productive, don't you think?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    56. Re:Rename it by hazah · · Score: 1

      Because, believe it or not, he's not the only benefactor if this FS survives. Your mind is on revenge, and it is a fruitless endeavour.

    57. Re:Rename it by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      well, I've seen the needle and the damage done.

      (sorry, neil.)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    58. Re:Rename it by sjames · · Score: 1

      That might bring up too many memories of not being able to fit the data onto the drive you know it fits on when you try to repair it.

    59. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia ReiserFS rename YOU!

    60. Re:Rename it by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      If you wake up to the same woman for 50 years, it's not much of a shock, but if you wake up next to a 70 year old woman for the first time, lemmie tell you, IT'S A SHOCK!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    61. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's already in prison, adding unnecessary psychological torture is just being a dick.

      If ReiserFS is worth maintaining, use it, and keep the name because it was Reiser who started the project and that's what people know it as. If it's not worth maintaining, drop it and let it die.

    62. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reiser's name should be removed, as he has shamed the community. How about NinaFS

    63. Re:Rename it by flyingfsck · · Score: 0

      I am one of the few people that got your joke.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    64. Re:Rename it by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      more specifically, by the Nazi trade union Deutsche Arbeitsfron, and 80% of Volkwagons wartime labor force was slave labor.

      Ironically, right after the war the company really took off when the town was part of the British occupation zone and the British army ordered huge amounts of the vehicles.

    65. Re:Rename it by Sectoid_Dev · · Score: 1

      No, because I would be careful with placing the duct tape.

    66. Re:Rename it by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 1

      A German.

      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    67. Re:Rename it by bipbop · · Score: 1

      I am shocked! Simply shocked.

    68. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      give it time

    69. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OJFS?
      tag line : "The FS Juice is Loose!"

    70. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2xBitchHadItComingFS

    71. Re:Rename it by countach · · Score: 1

      Why, is it reflexive now?

    72. Re:Rename it by sethmeisterg · · Score: 1

      LowerHerFS

    73. Re:Rename it by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Now that is mighty clever. A bit tasteless, I suppose, but very clever.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    74. Re:Rename it by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      I suspect Volkswagen wouldn't be as popular though if it was called something like Auschwitzwagen.

      There's also a pretty big difference between the name of a company and the name of a person, at least as far as association goes.

    75. Re:Rename it by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      He's already in prison, adding unnecessary psychological torture is just being a dick.

      If ReiserFS is worth maintaining, use it, and keep the name because it was Reiser who started the project and that's what people know it as. If it's not worth maintaining, drop it and let it die.

      Rename it is a better suggestion though. Dropping the codebase is, I agree, not rational or sensible. But renaming it is - after all, you do terrible shit, lo and behold we simply choose to forget you. Seems apt.

      If ReiserFS can be a good filesystem, I'd rather see it renamed and continued in development - shedding the baggage of it's creators actions is a good idea. It also means the new filesystem can be considered on its own merits - currently a Google search for ReiserFS leads to the 3rd hit being about the murder.

    76. Re:Rename it by Teancum · · Score: 1

      The thought of changing this to "OJFS" seems to suggest another famous Californian. I just don't know how you can get away from the puns.

    77. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a man married for 10 years now I'd have to say no, no you haven't thought about murdering your wife.

    78. Re:Rename it by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      If you can find any name that's not related to murdering your wife, go for it. Bonus points if it's catchy.

      I though they were changing it to "Open Journaling FileSystem".

      Ninafs has been suggested and I for one would find that entirely appropriate.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    79. Re:Rename it by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that obscure author nobody's heard of, Stephen King.. Sure wish more people would read his books.

      (SK is my favorite author. At least once when there was a leap second added to a year, Letterman told a joke along the lines of "Just enough time for Stephen King to churn out another book.")

    80. Re:Rename it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Whoosh! You got it, but you didn't get it was a joke.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    81. Re:Rename it by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      In what morbid universe would that be at all appropriate?!

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    82. Re:Rename it by sodul · · Score: 2

      When they kill and burry the project?

    83. Re:Rename it by petman · · Score: 1

      If you wake up to the same woman for 50 years, it's not much of a shock, but if you wake up next to a 70 year old woman for the first time, lemmie tell you, IT'S A SHOCK!

      Well, if you've been married to the same woman for 40 years, waking up next to her on her 70th birthday shouldn't be that much of a shock.

    84. Re:Rename it by Tukz · · Score: 1

      If only anyone could find it...

      --
      - Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
    85. Re:Rename it by gigaherz · · Score: 1

      Better: MDRWFS

    86. Re:Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect Volkswagen wouldn't be as popular though if it was called something like Auschwitzwagen.

      Can't be that much worse that calling the company Von Adolf Gegründet (translates to "founded by Adolf"), abbreviated VAG.

    87. Re:Rename it by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      No, and maybe.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    88. Re:Rename it by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      If you go on a bender and wake up next to (fill in your fantasy) it's not a shock, bu wake up next to a stranger my age and lemme tell you, it's a shock!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    89. Re:Rename it by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      ... presumably you'd use HideTheSausageFS for encrypted partitions?

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    90. Re:Rename it by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      +1 - although I'm guessing most folks here won't get the reference...

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  2. Time to let it go... by jythie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One of the strneghts, and weaknesses, of the OSS community is trying bunches of things in parrell to see which ones pan out well. But after a point, it is probably better to just like a project die. Granted no one can tell the individual developers what is 'worth' their time since that is a personal matter, I am sure other projects could use their talents more then this one. ReiserFS is a solution looking for a problem where better solutions surpass it.

    1. Re:Time to let it go... by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's also key is that the better points of ReiserFS, such as journaling, have migrated into other file systems. The experiment wasn't a failure, it was a darn good idea that has led to an overall improvement in reliability and speed of other file systems.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Time to let it go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      One of the strneghts, and weaknesses, of the OSS community is trying bunches of things in parrell to see which ones pan out well. But after a point, it is probably better to just like a project die. Granted no one can tell the individual developers what is 'worth' their time since that is a personal matter, I am sure other projects could use their talents more then this one. ReiserFS is a solution looking for a problem where better solutions surpass it.

      Yes, let the project die. And bury it. Out in the woods somewhere. After reading a book about how to retire a project. And be sure to wash the comments out of the repository.

    3. Re:Time to let it go... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've been watching Btrfs and it feels like they're merging in most of the features Reiser had in mind without saying so explicitly. I've considered it a spiritual successor for a while now.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:Time to let it go... by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Reiser4 was supposed to give us a different way of working with file metadata by making files into directories, was supposed to allow us to set different file permissions on every line of /etc/passwd, or maybe every field. All those features were dropped though, so what's the point now when other filesystems are further ahead in other areas?

    5. Re:Time to let it go... by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

      One of the strneghts, and weaknesses, of the OSS community is trying bunches of things in parrell to see which ones pan out well. But after a point, it is probably better to just like a project die.

      ...And then take all the seats out of your car and tell the police that you haven't seen the project for months.

    6. Re:Time to let it go... by interval1066 · · Score: 2

      Protip: if you want your FOSS project to move forward and match the features of other technologies, and enrich the community AND yourself, DON'T MURDER YOUR WIFE.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    7. Re:Time to let it go... by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      Some people have different priorities.

    8. Re:Time to let it go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did we quit after the Germans bombed Perl Harbor? I don't know. But I do know that winners never quit and quitters never win.

    9. Re:Time to let it go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the strneghts, and weaknesses, of the closed source software community is trying bunches of things in parrell to see which ones pan out well. But after a point, it is probably better to just like a product die. . Granted no one can tell the individual developers what is 'worth' their time since that is a personal matter, I am sure other products could use their talents more then this one.

    10. Re:Time to let it go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ReiserFS is a solution looking for a problem where better solutions surpass it.

      One of the great things about Linux specifically, not just "OSS", is the filesystem diversity. When you start screwing around with this stuff, you quickly realize there are so many different problems to solve and values held, that there is no best filesystem. There's just a best filesystem for a particular job.

      After all these years, reiserfs3 (the old one; I still have never tried reiser4) appears to be the ass-kickinest filesystem (and by a rather wide margin) for a certain job: many small files all in one directory (maildir is the classic example of this). It's a job that comes up in real life, hardly obscure.

      Seriously: if JFS, XFS, BtrFS or ext4 were even half as fast as Reiser3 in situations-like-maildir, then I might agree with you, but it ain't the case. Nothing even comes close to ReiserFS in this situation.

      Of course, maybe that's an argument for letting Reiser4 go, but having Reiser3 be the "eternal" branch (and yes, it could use some bugfixes) that sticks around for a hundred years.

    11. Re:Time to let it go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Journaling is not the main attraction of ReiserFS. It's the validation of the million-small-file design. Why use a database? Why accumulate records in larger files? Just make every record a separate file (and Hans Reiser wanted to go even further down that path).

      Numerous software systems have employed the million-small-file approach. It is simple, natural, attractive. There are lots of handy shell utilities for ad-hoc scripts and other useful tricks.

      The ReiserFS was all about the namespace. We already have it in linux/unix. It's the file system namespace. It should be used to the fullest. Reading a small file should be as efficient as reading a line of a larger file.

      Screw SQL. All data should be amenable to grep, awk, perl, od, rm, mv, ln, sort, head, cut &co.

    12. Re:Time to let it go... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      It looks to me like the whole thing is in maintenance mode now anyways. Updates so newer kernels can access the file system are just enough so that legacy systems can be updated.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    13. Re:Time to let it go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people have different priorities.

      Hm... work on next-gen filesystem, or murder my wife... let's see... filesystem... murder wife... filesystem... murder wife... well, one's got to go if I want to get anything done around here!

    14. Re:Time to let it go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, STFU and stop with the copypasta, or at the very least run a goddamn spellchecker next time.

    15. Re:Time to let it go... by cyrano.mac · · Score: 1

      The Germans bombed Perl Harbour? Is that where are the Perl devs live? And when was this? Winners do quit. All of them. That's the one certainty we have in life. One day we quit.

    16. Re:Time to let it go... by Nelson · · Score: 1

      You mean journaling and some other features migrated to ReiserFS...

      It pushed some issues, also went about things the wrong way with the community.

      Fundamentally, and this is an issue that caused community issues with Reiser pushed on it initially, a filesystem's integrity is paramount. People trust it to safely store data. Reliability tradeoffs for performance doesn't cut it; regardless of the benchmarks. The other thing, how committed is the community to taking care of it? Last thing you want is a couple terabytes of data on a disk that you cannot read. The geek boys that want to simply run benchmarks might get a kick out of it but it's devastating when you lose data to something you trusted..

    17. Re:Time to let it go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP is wrong. The Guidos bombed Perl harbor.

    18. Re:Time to let it go... by clampolo · · Score: 1

      Very interesting. The stuff about large numbers of small files seemed silly to me until I read your post. Making the file system absorb the capabilities of a database is clever and would make a lot of things easier.

    19. Re:Time to let it go... by Quick+Reply · · Score: 1

      But after a point, it is probably better to just like a project die.

      I see what you did there.

    20. Re:Time to let it go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Japanese.

    21. Re:Time to let it go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoosh

    22. Re:Time to let it go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very interesting. The stuff about large numbers of small files seemed silly to me until I read your post. Making the file system absorb the capabilities of a database is clever and would make a lot of things easier.

      ...and slower too with very little gain.

    23. Re:Time to let it go... by tibit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Databases obviously handle it just fine, so the theoretical impossibility isn't there, and demonstrably so. The question is whether existing filesystem APIs are up for the job. I think they aren't. Passing things back and forth one file name or one file descriptor at a time is quite wasteful. Syscalls aren't free.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    24. Re:Time to let it go... by columbus · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I heard some pretty good things about UnRAID & from what I understand it's based on reiserfs
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_RAID_levels#UnRAID

      I can't say I understand how it works. UnRAID is a product of lime technologies & closed source as far as I can tell. Still sounds interesting though.

      --
      friends don't let friends teleport drunk
    25. Re:Time to let it go... by defcon-11 · · Score: 1

      For that to work, you'd have to bolt on some type of indexing system, which seems way out of scope for a standard file system.

    26. Re:Time to let it go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could make ReiserFS GPL3, so that we have at least one GPL3 based FS which can be used for GNU/Hurd whenever that's available

    27. Re:Time to let it go... by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8lT1o0sDwI

      Although just because someone said it in a movie, doesn't make it notable.

    28. Re:Time to let it go... by kenorland · · Score: 1

      But in that case... why not simply put one of the existing high performance key-value stores into the kernel?

    29. Re:Time to let it go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protip: if you want your FOSS project to move forward and match the features of other technologies, and enrich the community AND yourself, DON'T MURDER YOUR WIFE.

      Thanks. Next time I'm thinking of murdering my wife, I'll stop and ask: WWAPD (What would a professional do)?

    30. Re:Time to let it go... by jbo5112 · · Score: 1

      Named columns are very useful. Using those tools would be like going from named variables to directly using memory addresses.

      Now if you took the tools and bolted on the ability to read & use a header row, then you could be on to something. Having the ability to use sql from bash would be useful in some cases too, especially for devs and admins who use a lot of sql.

    31. Re:Time to let it go... by hardwarefreak · · Score: 1

      What's also key is that the better points of ReiserFS, such as journaling, have migrated into other file systems. The experiment wasn't a failure, it was a darn good idea that has led to an overall improvement in reliability and speed of other file systems.

      WTF have you been smoking? JFS1 and XFS predate ReiserFS by 10 and 7 years respectively. Both are journaling filesystems. There are probably mainframe journaling FSes that predate these. In short, Hans borrowed the journaling idea from others, same goes for most of his FS concepts. Hans had no original filesystem concepts of his own, none that were ever implemented or proven any good in production. Optimizing a filesystem for high performance with small files isn't a concept, but an execution and tuning detail.

      All filesystem developers borrow ideas from prior work, and Hans was no different than others in this regard. In fact there is frequent cross pollination of concepts. Proof of point: Ted Ts'o borrowed from the allocation group concept in XFS and implemented something similar in EXT4. Dave Chinner borrowed a concept from the journaling mechanism in EXT3 and implemented something similar in XFS. Note the praise Hans piles on the XFS devs for schooling him in delayed allocation, which prevents fragmentation (AIUI, Resier3 was pretty horrible about fragmenting files and free space):

      From: http://www.osnews.com/story/69
      Hans Reiser: This is an area we are still experimenting with. We currently do what ext2 does, and preallocate blocks. What XFS does is much better, they allocate blocknrs to blocks at the time they are flushed to disk, and this allows a much more efficient and optimal allocation to occur. We knew we couldn't do it the XFS way and make code freeze for 2.4, but reiser4 is being built around delayed allocation, and I'd like to thank the XFS developers for taking the time to personally explain to me why delayed allocation is the way to go.

      Hans Reiser was no visionary. Like all kernel developers, he borrowed from others' ideas, improving on some. Note that Reiser4 was to be built around delayed allocation. This interview was published in 2001. It's 11 years later and still no Reiser4. On the other hand, we've seen constant full blown development of XFS and EXTx in these 11 years, by large teams of dedicated developers. Both XFS and EXT4 steamroll the small file performance of Reiser3 by a large margin, and we've seen the introduction of a copy on write FS, BTRFS, which doesn't even use a journal. Though the true performance metrics of a mature BTRFS have yet to be realized, nor the level of fragmentation, which is sure to be an issue with COW.

    32. Re:Time to let it go... by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      Didn't Pick OS do something like that? (I never used it myself, but remember a couple of colleagues raving about it many moons ago)

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  3. lol...uh, no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope...time to say buh bye.

  4. What are we really talking about here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Would we even be bothered in following this kind of story if it weren't for the murder? If not than just let it go now.

    1. Re:What are we really talking about here? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2

      ReiserFS was the best FS out there for a while. This is the next version of it. I'm curious about it, just for that reason.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    2. Re:What are we really talking about here? by Desler · · Score: 1

      No it was "the best" for a small segment of benchmarks.

    3. Re:What are we really talking about here? by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      When you were running Linux as a Desktop, or even if you were 'playing' with it as a server (lot's of reboots) all the technical benchmarks you could quote, graph or shout about meant nothing compared to not having to wait for fsck upon bootup. Only for a computer in a production environment that never or rarely gets restarted did anything other benchmark compare in importance.

    4. Re:What are we really talking about here? by default+luser · · Score: 1

      And it was also the less stable of the two. I found this out after my guru friend told me to go with Reiser for the best performance.

      All it took for me to switch back over to EXT3 forever was coming back one day and finding my filesystem inaccessible. Years of stable operation from the same disk on EXT3 showed that is was NOT a hardware issue.

      ReiserFS was "almost" as stable as EXT3, but when we're talking about something that handles all your critical data, "almost" doesn't cut it! I suppose if you can afford a backup solution, you can take your chances with Reiser...but I have no more patience for his filesystem, regardless of his crimes.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    5. Re:What are we really talking about here? by tibit · · Score: 1

      Nobody can afford not having a backup solution, mind you.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    6. Re:What are we really talking about here? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Nobody can afford not having a backup solution, mind you.

      My data is worthless, you insensitive clod.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    7. Re:What are we really talking about here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only worthless thing here's you which therefore makes your data worthless.

    8. Re:What are we really talking about here? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Meds wearing off early this month?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    9. Re:What are we really talking about here? by tibit · · Score: 1

      My bad then, please accept sincere apologies :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    10. Re:What are we really talking about here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed your shock therapy sessions troll as well as your meds.

    11. Re:What are we really talking about here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll gmhowell and his boring tired burned out lines for comebacks. You're worthless as was said of you.

    12. Re:What are we really talking about here? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      It was the first journalled file system in the trunk of the linux kernel. That made it the best for me. It was also the default FS for many distros.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  5. Suggested name change by benjfowler · · Score: 0

    Make it more popular (or less unpopular, as it were), by giving it a name change.

    Call it 'RicerFS', and make everyone compile it from sources only (especially for Gentoo users).

    Thank you, thank you. I'm here all week.

    1. Re:Suggested name change by Atzanteol · · Score: 2

      It would need a lot more configurable flags and useless values to tweak for us Gentoo folks to take it up. :-)

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    2. Re:Suggested name change by Anrego · · Score: 1

      Kidding aside and as a fellow Gentoo user, I've actually found a lot of those use flags have gone away and been replaced with high level feature level flags. I mean there are still the classics and my package.use is fairly long.. but it's definitely improved (or gotten worse depending on your viewpoint) in the last few years..

  6. Murder joke thread! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's going to be a few off color jokes. May as well get started.

    * It's a killer filesystem.

    * My disk died. Was ReiserFS the murderer?

    * It's more cutting edge than Reiser's knife.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
    1. Re:Murder joke thread! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      * It's more cutting edge than Reiser's knife.

      You meant

      * It's even faster than Reiser's bullets.

    2. Re:Murder joke thread! by Ja'Achan · · Score: 2

      A couple celebrating their 75th anniversary was asked if they ever considered divorce. "Divorce?" said the one, "no, never. Murder, sure, but never divorce."

    3. Re:Murder joke thread! by Linzer · · Score: 1

      * It's more cutting edge than Reiser's knife.

      I think the classic phrase is, Reiser's razor.

      --
      Gravitation is a theory, not a fact.
    4. Re:Murder joke thread! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ReiserFS released... Kills it!

    5. Re:Murder joke thread! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more dead than his wife?

    6. Re:Murder joke thread! by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      its really Bleeding edged

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    7. Re:Murder joke thread! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the other FS developers with the pumped up kicks better run, better run, faster than my bullets...

    8. Re:Murder joke thread! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are at Squeezed now. Or would that be Squeezing blood.

    9. Re:Murder joke thread! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Nina should have known, never mount a corrupted filesystem maker

  7. Benchmarks don't matter by vlm · · Score: 1

    Sorry for being on topic. I remember discussing this on /. and I'm still kinda surprised Hans actually did it. I still think it was a bad conviction, even if it randomly happened to have turned out to be correct. Kind of like the salem witch trial convictions were wrong, even if we somehow figured out one of them was a real live magical genuine witch after the fact (however unlikely that would be).

    Anyway, enough dr phil and now on to IT stuff:

    1) Most benchmarks don't matter. Nobody makes money running benchmarks. Because the cost of casting up a production image is virtually (ha ha) zero because of virtualization SW and NAS stuff and puppet and some other tools, its well worth your while to spend an hour or two trying various instrumented FS to see which is fastest under your own workload, unless your workload is so stereotypical you can just rely on the hivemind opinion. Best of all if you can load balance on the FE then run multiple BE each with different FS and if applicable different FS parameters then watch how each FS actually performs under real live load. This is how REAL IT is done, as opposed to "I drunk me an energy drink and got a linux CDrom with this magazine and read me a slashdot article" style IT. I would not be surprised if somebody with some totally werido workload actually benefits off running reiserfs. Its a huge possible solution space and I'm sure it wins somewhere.

    2) Check out the contents of something like /lib/modules/"somethin"/kernel/fs. Dude, I've got a minix module which I haven't used production since 1992 ish era (running minix of course). As long as someone, somewhere, has an old disk image from some historical whatever, someone's probably going to want computer archaeologist tools to look at the innards on a modern system. Admittedly for minix and maybe soon reiserfs, they might be better served by something like "mtools for reiserfs" than a kernel module or a FUSE solution, but if someone wants to do something in free software that you don't personally like, well good luck stopping them. Whaddya gonna do, change the license to something non-free just to stop them? Good luck!

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by Desler · · Score: 2

      Sorry for being on topic. I remember discussing this on /. and I'm still kinda surprised Hans actually did it. I still think it was a bad conviction, even if it randomly happened to have turned out to be correct. Kind of like the salem witch trial convictions were wrong, even if we somehow figured out one of them was a real live magical genuine witch after the fact (however unlikely that would be).

      Yeah, it was so terrible that they had evidence rather than loony conspiracy theories like Hans and his defense attorneys were throwing out. He was not some person being prosecuted for being "weird" or other such nonsense that you defenders kept claiming. He was an emotional and physical abusive asshole who murdered his wife for having the 'audacity' to leave an abusive relationship. He deserves no sympathy.

    2. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by jjohnson · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm still kinda surprised Hans actually did it

      Yeah, you shouldn't be. It was obvious to the police, and to those of us here not in love with the 'aspie geek as lovable, misunderstood misanthrope' stereotype that he did it. The minute the evidence came out, it screamed "he totally fucking killed her!" From Nina disappearing without her passport or money or cell phone, to Hans hosing out the interior of his car, to buying police procedure textbooks, all after Nina started to separate from him... Don't let Alex Belits' contortions confuse you. It was a good conviction based on straightforward evidence of first degree murder.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    3. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      I'm still kinda surprised Hans actually did it

      I had thought that anyone with the genius to make a better file system would surely find an acceptable way to solve domestic problems. Why didn't he simply get a divorce? And that's why at first I thought he didn't do it. Instead, like Lisa Nowak, he served himself up as another example that even the brightest and presumably best among us can still lose it, and kick all sense of morality and civilized behavior to the curb. Temporary insanity doesn't explain it, nor does unstable teenage emotions. It's nearly as bad as if a Nobel Peace Prize winner were to go postal. There were more problems than marital discord, but those still do not constitute acceptable excuses. Money was a big issue. One way for any one person to get that far with a file system project is to obsess over it to the point that nothing else matters, and the obsession becomes another issue. Yet there were many acceptable ways to resolve all the issues. He could have lived more modestly, to ease the money problems. That's easier than most Americans are willing to admit. Instead, they prefer to work their rear ends off, and even contemplate doing some crime, for the sake of social status.

      Assuming there's any merit in doing so, any group that wants to continue development ought to fork the project to get away from the name.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    4. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just read some of the letters filed by Hans in his civil trial and tell me that you're still surprised he did it. A real doozy is this 269 page rant. In addition to his usual blaming of Nina and insistence he had to kill her to protect his kids, he says stuff like (pg 229)

      It is something of a testimony to how doing legal work has warped my mind that I argue here that cloning Nina constitutes a morally necessary act to reduce her death to the minimum force necessary to the protection of my children from her (given her desire to harm them through proxies protected in their harming by State Actor proxies too powerful for me to timely overcome.) I knew Nina better than all but a very few, and I know that Nina would have liked to have been cloned."

      He goes off (starting on page 249) about how Einstein was wrong and Hans' new "Theory of Absolutivity" will make him trillions if he would just be allowed to conduct some experiments. Those trillions could be used to pay off the damages Hans thinks he is owed:

      • Rates Of Actual Damages and Actual Damages Before Applying Multipliers (Based On Disproof Of Relativity Being Found Valid)

      $1 trillion+ for each of myself, Rory, and Niorline for each year from Sept. 8th 2006 until our reunification and my release, as actual damages for our separation and my non-heightened aspect of my imprisonment, fractional yers prorated.

      $500 million per hour for each period of heightened imprisonment (C-Status and Ad-Seg) experienced, for actual damages.

      $250 million per hour for each period of being wrongfully placed in an environment of a higher security level prison, as actual damages.

      $500 million per day of being wrongfully kept 'Closed A', as actual damages.

      $1 billion per hour for every hour of my time consumed by overcoming interference, with my effective access to the courts, obstruction of justice, denials of due process (including within the prison grievance process), and other tortious or wrongful acts. (This is distinguished from attorney fees.)

      Hans Reiser is a sick fuck who is right where he belongs. The jury saw that very clearly during his two weeks on the stand. It's sad that he didn't end up there before he killed someone but we can all take relief in the fact that the parole board is unlikely to ever release him.

    5. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      Come on, if you are going to make a statement like that at least give some reasons.

    6. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by tibit · · Score: 1

      That's some batshit crazy stuff indeed :(

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    7. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes the brightest among us aren't the best, they're high-function psychopaths.

    8. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and he totally confessed and took them to the body!

    9. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by dbIII · · Score: 1

      There was a LOT of discussion here presuming guilt when she was missing and the car was missing long before the evidence came out.

    10. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they were right about it.

    11. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What evidence? A lot was reported on Slashdot about the case (nobody else has heard about the guy, so it's not like I could have watched it on CNN instead), but nothing about any evidence.

      It was so bad that near the end of the trial, the prosecutor was showing all his geek traits, to show how different he was. The same traits that most of us here would display if faced with a case like that.

      And then it turned out he knew where the body was, the first evidence we heard about, and yet it surfaced only after he was convicted.

    12. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the guy was nuts. That doesn't mean that he did it, though.

      However, had there been any evidence that he did it, people would be presenting that instead, to those of us who were surprised that he did it. But with no evidence, there was nothing left but convicting the loon.

      And yes, I was also one of those surprised when he took them to the body, thus proving that he was at least involved in the murder, after people like you (and the prosecutors) had spent so much time convincing us to look at the craziness, rather than presenting any evidence. And no, I never liked the guy, nor his file system. Well, his file system anyway, I didn't know the guy.

    13. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had thought that anyone with the genius to make a better file system would surely find an acceptable way to solve domestic problems.

      "Genius" does not imply "is also a nice person who can get along with others". I'm baffled that you could think otherwise.

      Consider the very thing which causes you to regard him as a genius, his filesystem. (In reality it wasn't that amazing that he should be regarded as a genius, but whatever, that's a wholly different conversation.) In his dealings with the Linux kernel community, Reiser was paranoid, egotistical, insecure, jealous, and verbally abusive. He made enemies out of virtually everyone he needed to collaborate with. It's easy to find examples of this in mailing list archives. That's not a guy whom you'd expect to be good at dealing with domestic problems.

      Especially not domestic problems which he created by being paranoid, egotistical, insecure, jealous, and abusive with his own family. Those sorts of personality traits don't tend to be limited to just one social context, and they definitely were not in this case, as you'd know had you followed the trial closely.

      Why didn't he simply get a divorce?

      Did you not pay any attention to the case? A divorce was in progress when he murdered Nina. It was Nina who filed for divorce, not Hans, and she filed because Hans was being a crazy abusive control freak. They had been separated for quite a long time by the time he murdered her.

      It's quite clear he did it out of classic abuser anger over her choice to leave him, and her attempts to gain full custody of the children. He hasn't ever put it in those terms, but it's not hard to read between the lines.

      And that's why at first I thought he didn't do it. Instead, like Lisa Nowak, he served himself up as another example that even the brightest and presumably best among us can still lose it, and kick all sense of morality and civilized behavior to the curb.

      No. Just no. Regardless of how bright Hans Reiser is or is not, he was never one of the best among us. He was and is a piece of shit. The only form of human interaction he's ever been good at is superficial charisma and self-promotion, a common trait in psychopaths and narcissists.

      I'll put it to you this way. After it was all over, Lisa Nowak seemed to realize what she did was wrong and tried to go away as quietly as she could. Reiser, on the other hand, never misses an opportunity to claim that he was unfairly persecuted by the law, or that it wasn't really wrong for him to kill Nina:

      http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/07/linux-guru-returns-to-court/

      It's nearly as bad as if a Nobel Peace Prize winner were to go postal. There were more problems than marital discord, but those still do not constitute acceptable excuses. Money was a big issue. One way for any one person to get that far with a file system project is to obsess over it to the point that nothing else matters, and the obsession becomes another issue. Yet there were many acceptable ways to resolve all the issues. He could have lived more modestly, to ease the money problems. That's easier than most Americans are willing to admit. Instead, they prefer to work their rear ends off, and even contemplate doing some crime, for the sake of social status.

      Hans Reiser's problems went far, far beyond being obsessed with a file system or money.

    14. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was plenty of evidence that he did it and the prosecution spent months presenting it, that's why the jury convicted him of first degree murder. Hans changing the visitation schedule so Nina would show up at his house when his mom was at Burning Man, Nina last seen at his house, Ninas blood in the house, the location of Nina's vehicle, the contents of the vehicle, the removed battery on her phone, Rory's testimony, Hans hosing down the driveway, Hans hosing out his car, Hans pitching the passenger seat, Hans removing much of the carpet and trim in his car, Ninas blood on items in the car, Hans sleeping at mom's and hotels and not in his car, Hans showing up at the kids school, Hans completely exhausted after spending all night burying his ex wife, Hans comparing Nina to the Nazis, Hans threatening Nina saying he's very good at combat, etc... Last in my list but not least, he got up on the stand and lied his ass off for two weeks. Stupidly, he even voluntarily admitted on the stand that he had lied about whether he habitually removes his own phone battery which highlighted the import of Nina's phone battery being removed and allowed the jury to consider any/all of his testimony to be a lie. It simply wasn't reasonable to conclude that anything happened other than Hans killed her and hid the body because he hated Nina and wanted her out of the picture so he could have full custody of his kids.

    15. Re:Benchmarks don't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you are ignorant of the evidence doesn't mean there wasn't any. Try reading Henry Lee's live blog of the trial.

  8. Double Standard...? by beaverdownunder · · Score: 0

    Einstein did invent the atomic bomb, didn't he...?

    That said, sure, strip his name from the file system to dishonour him, but at least acknowledge that we _do_ use all sorts of tech today invented by people who did some pretty bad shit...

    1. Re:Double Standard...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you're thinking of Oppenheimer:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Robert_Oppenheimer

    2. Re:Double Standard...? by vlm · · Score: 2

      Einstein did invent the atomic bomb, didn't he...?

      LOL no that's not really his thing. It was a big physics project and he was a physicist some decades before Trinity, but that's about as much connection as exists.

      Its like asking who invented the computer (or the internet), the real invention is the very twisty logic required to narrow it down to only and exactly one person.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:Double Standard...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but, this is FOSS we're talking about. Our heroes are often overweight, sexually inactive, have excessive facial hair, eat toejam, kill their spouses, or have serious mental conditions like Asperger's. We've got to sweep a few people under the rug.

    4. Re:Double Standard...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Marie Curie invented radiation.

    5. Re:Double Standard...? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Einstein did invent the atomic bomb, didn't he...?

      No. next question

    6. Re:Double Standard...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Einstein did invent the atomic bomb, didn't he...?

      Its like asking who invented the computer (or the internet), the real invention is the very twisty logic required to narrow it down to only and exactly one person.

      That would be Babbage (and Al Gore) right?

    7. Re:Double Standard...? by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      Einstein did invent the atomic bomb, didn't he...?

      No. Einstein's threory was necessary for its invention, but the primary guys were Niels Bohr and Enrico Fermi. In 1934 the idea of chain reaction via neutron was proposed by Leó Szilárd, who patented the idea of the atomic bomb (British patent 630,726). See wikipedia.

    8. Re:Double Standard...? by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Everyone else has already said no, but I would like to point out that there is a grain of truth to that statement. . . Einstein's signature on a letter to FDR was the impetus for the Manhattan Project - he was concerned that the Nazis would develop a nuke first.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93Szil%C3%A1rd_letter

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    9. Re:Double Standard...? by partyguerrilla · · Score: 2

      Einstein did invent the atomic bomb, didn't he...?

      No, no he fucking didn't.

    10. Re:Double Standard...? by kasperd · · Score: 2

      who patented the idea of the atomic bomb

      By the time you are considering using an atomic bomb, I guess being sued for patent infringement is the least of your concerns.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    11. Re:Double Standard...? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Likewise, if Reiser had killed his wife out of legitimate concern that otherwise she would kill him, he wouldn't be in jail now.

  9. state sponsored development by secondhand_Buddah · · Score: 2

    On the bight side, Hans might have a 20 year all expenses paid development cycle ahead of him. Think of the contribution he could make if allowed to.
    Talk about making productive use of prisoners time.

    --
    Participatory Governance : The only feasible option for a real democracy, where everyone really does have a say.
    1. Re:state sponsored development by jeffmeden · · Score: 2

      On the bight side, Hans might have a 20 year all expenses paid development cycle ahead of him. Think of the contribution he could make if allowed to.

        Talk about making productive use of prisoners time.

      You're right, the Core 2 Duo machine with a SATA-1 7200 rpm disk that he got when he went into the clink will run un-fucking-believably well 20 years from now. That only leaves one problem...

    2. Re:state sponsored development by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      There's no way for Hans to make meaningful progress without relatively unfettered Internet access, and there's no way any prisoner for his crime would be allowed that.

      Not to mention that allowing someone to continue on his life's work undisturbed is not exactly the point of incarceration.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    3. Re:state sponsored development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      allowing someone to continue on his life's work undisturbed is not exactly the point of incarceration.

      WTF not? As long as his life's work is not criminal? IMHO, incarceration for a crime such as this has the purpose of separating dangerous elements from society. Reiser is bottled up in prison for the same reason acid is bottled up in glass. If there's a practical way for him to contribute, I say let's have it. His only "monetary" reward might be some cigs or a little extra library privelege. The rest can go to the estate of the victim.

    4. Re:state sponsored development by jjohnson · · Score: 2

      The purpose of incarceration is more than simply separating dangerous elements from society. It's to punish as well, at least for deterrence, and it hardly punishes Reiser to give him a lifestyle allowing him a monastic devotion (and an appreciative community) to something he feels is important.

      You can disagree that punishment or deterrence should be the point of incarceration, but that's the way it is right now.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    5. Re:state sponsored development by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      You can disagree that punishment or deterrence should be the point of incarceration, but that's the way it is right now.

      I'm not sure what method you used to derive that conclusion.

      Based on the observable effects of prisons it looks like their purpose is to funnel money to contractors and prison guard unions, and to allow politicians the ability to adjust their public image favorably.

      If punishment leading to deterrence was the goal of the prison system it's hard to explain why their methods haven't changed based on the many decades of clear evidence that punishment doesn't accomplishing this goal.

    6. Re:state sponsored development by countach · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but they're supposed to keep them productively occupied, preferably for the good of society, not to mention making sure they have a future if and when they are released. Arguably letting him work on it would fulfil those goals.

    7. Re:state sponsored development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can disagree that punishment or deterrence should be the point of incarceration, but that's the way it is right now.

      I'm not sure what method you used to derive that conclusion.

      Based on the observable effects of prisons it looks like their purpose is to funnel money to contractors and prison guard unions, and to allow politicians the ability to adjust their public image favorably.

      And how is it that politicians get a favorable public image for doing this? Why, by selling voters on the idea that we need more prisons and tougher sentencing to punish the wicked and deter crime. So yes, incarceration in US society today is very much linked to punishment and deterrence.

      And no, that's not a denial that funneling money to contractors and prison guard money is an issue. Because that's certainly a factor. But that doesn't mean there are absolutely no other factors at play. Prison guard unions wouldn't get anywhere if there wasn't a large, rabidly self-righteous voting bloc in the US which laps this bullshit about punishment and deterrence up. Especially when the rhetoric and legislation uses dog-whistle racism to target groups they don't like.

      If punishment leading to deterrence was the goal of the prison system it's hard to explain why their methods haven't changed based on the many decades of clear evidence that punishment doesn't accomplishing this goal.

      We're talking about Republican politicians, here, not people who think deeply about social issues and alter their mantras when reality contradicts them. It doesn't matter at all to these assholes whether they're doing any good. They know they can reliably get votes and campaign funds by claiming any opponents who are against turning America into a collection of concentration camps are "soft on crime".

    8. Re:state sponsored development by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      That only leaves one problem...

      And that problem might turn out to be a PITA (quite literally)

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  10. Why would you even care? by rudy_wayne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    has much stigma due to Hans Reiser

    Really? You can't just judge it based on it's features and performance?

    So if Linus Torvalds ever commits a crime, you'll stop using Linux?

    1. Re:Why would you even care? by Atzanteol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's human nature. His name taints his work now. Most people don't want to look at shit while they're eating nor do they want to think of some asshole who killed his wife when formatting a file system.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    2. Re:Why would you even care? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      I don't get this either. Being a genius doesn't preclude being a tyrant of some form. Being a murdered doesn't preclude being an incredible programmer.

      I only wish we could give the guy a keyboard to bang away at in prison ...

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:Why would you even care? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2

      Being a murdered doesn't preclude being an incredible programmer.

      Actually I think that one would.

    4. Re:Why would you even care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good point.

      Maybe they should rename it to MonkFS or something.

      I never heard about any monk killing his wife...

    5. Re:Why would you even care? by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Torvalds is smarter than that; Rieser was so smart he thought he could make his issues and problems go away with the power of his mind. Its obvious he was full of himself, read about his story during the trial a few years ago. He defended himself at some point during the trial, that right there is a telling sign of how cuaght up in his own greatness he was.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    6. Re:Why would you even care? by gman003 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah, truly incredible programmers trap SIGKILL.

    7. Re:Why would you even care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's more or less why I don't use widows.

    8. Re:Why would you even care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Being a genius doesn't preclude being a tyrant of some form."

      Exactly. Look at Hitler.

    9. Re:Why would you even care? by idontgno · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And maybe that's the real damning point. Reiser was arrogant enough to murder, but not clever enough to get away with it. I'm not sure I want a system-level software product of a mentality like that. The phrase "too clever by half" comes to mind... clever enough to attempt something dangerous to my files, but not clever enough to actually make it succeed.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    10. Re:Why would you even care? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Your joke is much better than mine. :-)

    11. Re:Why would you even care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true. Look at the Penn State situation were the heinous crimes committed by one (and others may or may not have helped cover up, that hasn't been tried yet) tainted the name of the football team and school its self.

      Of course it's not very different than retail or other sales experience. If the customer hated the experience, chances are they will mouth off the loudest to their friends or anyone that will listen vs someone who had a good experience. In the case of the bad experience, they say that for every bad experience they'll tell 10 people about it. But when it comes to a good experience they *may* tell 1.

    12. Re:Why would you even care? by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Really? You can't just judge it based on it's features and performance?

      I can, but the rest of the world can't (or at least didn't). Not much point in using a filesystem that nobody else wants to support, even if their reasons aren't entirely rational.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    13. Re:Why would you even care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if Linus Torvalds ever commits a crime, you'll stop using Linux?

      Well, linus's wife is a finish national karate champion, so I think she's safe for now...

    14. Re:Why would you even care? by tibit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's demonstrably human nature to murder and rape, obviously. That's where reason comes in. If you can't reason around your instincts so to speak, you're not quite in control of your emotions, and I'd find it somewhat, uh, problematic let's say.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    15. Re:Why would you even care? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Dude, put down the pipe...

      wtfamireading.jpg

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    16. Re:Why would you even care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He let his guard down when Lt Columbo showed up with his trench coat and steno pad.

    17. Re:Why would you even care? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Well before his personal issues came to light, I wasn't that fond of ReiserFS due to the brittle way it handled problems. While the data could ultimately be recovered by DDing the volume to a larger drive, that's not very helpful when your server goes down on Saturday night.

    18. Re:Why would you even care? by tibit · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I didn't get the point across or if you're just purposely obtuse, but human "nature", as you put it, tends to be a self-fulfilling prophecy. It's up to oneself to stay rational. The "name tainting the work" may surely be how you initially feel, but man, if you don't take it past that and realize it's a somewhat childish approach, then I'm scared of you.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    19. Re:Why would you even care? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      No - your point was, shall we say, "too cleverly phrased" for me.

      Your new point is clear but wrong. Humans aren't rational creatures. We're emotional creatures as well as rational. You should interact with more of them.

      Sometimes on /. I feel like I'm explaining our species to an alien. This is one of those times. Are most nerds *actually* that as far removed from society as the media has portrayed us?

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    20. Re:Why would you even care? by Punto · · Score: 1

      Yeah like what if his runs someone over with a bus?

      --

      --
      Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

    21. Re:Why would you even care? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      yes yes, spell check ;-)

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    22. Re:Why would you even care? by hardwarefreak · · Score: 1

      has much stigma due to Hans Reiser

      Really? You can't just judge it based on it's features and performance?

      So if Linus Torvalds ever commits a crime, you'll stop using Linux?

      There was a vast treasure trove of useful human biomedical data produced by methods 100x beyond what we would call "inhumane torture" captured from both Germany and Japan at the end of WWII. Every doctor and researcher in the Western World refused to use this data, because it was so tainted by the fact our enemies produced the data, and the methods used to obtain it. I.e. infecting perfectly healthy people with things like plague, small pox, maleria, etc. Shooting, stabbing, and cleaving people at precise body locations to see how long it took for them to die of blood loss or infection. Then devising procedures and medicines their soldiers could use on the battlefield to stay alive long enough to make it to a field hostpital, etc.

      The stigma attached to the Reiser filesystems only differs to the above data obtained via atrocities by scale of the crime. Reiser killed and probably tortured one. The Nazis and the militarist Japanese killed millions. Given Reiser's personality and vindictiveness, he almost certainly tortured his wife before taking her life. Whether he commited these acts upon one victim or millions is irrevelant.

      To judge this work solely on technical merit and use it if found superior for your given workload is a purely techical decision. However, as a human being and member of society, you'd clearly have to be a sociopath to actually use it. Were the remaining devs to change the name, by forking it or whatever means, and cleansing best they can of Hans' code (rewrite/etc), it may begin to lose the stigma. But given most other Linux filesystems are now better than Reiser in every way, why bother with it?

  11. my personal opinion by shentino · · Score: 2

    The murder scandal got the project waylaid long enough that everyone else moved on.

    Even if the stigma that threw banana peels in the way is gone, reiser4 is still far behind.

    If it's open source, cannibalize it and take the features.

    1. Re:my personal opinion by Atzanteol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As far as I can tell btrfs has what features would be worth taking and then some - and is under more active development. I think reiserfs is dead long-term.

      I ran reiser3 for a long time. I was happy with it. But these days I'm on ext4 (and eyeing btrfs). Wonderful thing about btrfs and the ext* FS's is that they provided a migration plan. Reiser4 (at least last I checked) could not convert an existing FS (even reiser3). btrfs can even convert ext4 and allow you *TO GO BACK* if you want. How awesome is that?

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    2. Re:my personal opinion by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      ext4 here, quite happy with it.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    3. Re:my personal opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been using JFS every since ReiserFS3. Quite happy with it. (Wished it had shrink/grow capability though.)

    4. Re:my personal opinion by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I loved Reiser3 when it came out, but it always seemed to be on the fringes of the mainline because Reiser caused a lot of friction with other kernel devs. Linus had plenty of rants about the way the driver broke stuff, used weird code conventions or made dumb self serving decisions and these seemed to increase with Reiser 4 which was ridiculously ambitious and kept out of the mainline. I think even if Reiser hadn't been murdering his wife that it would have been a long time before it would have gone into the mainline, possibly never.

      I don't run data centres or massive databases and my requirements for a fs are pretty modest. Maybe Reiser4 would have solved them in time but ext3, ext4 and btrfs more than adequately cover those bases now and I haven't felt the need to choose anything else. Basically my needs for an fs over the basic stuff run to don't fragment, don't slow down too much with large numbers of files, don't waste space, don't corrupt and don't make me wait inordinate amounts of time after unexpected power downs.

    5. Re:my personal opinion by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It was moving very slowly due to an incomplete rewrite and abandoning the previous version.

  12. What about performance? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 0

    It has killer performance.

    It kills the other filesystems in the benchmarks.

  13. Maybe this is weird sentiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But let the team try to succeed, and maybe entice another high-grade mathematician into the project to boot. Any strangeness is exterior to the project despite the name, and there are plenty of advances we embrace despite the origins. Hypothermia studies, for example (in my junior high class they asked about the ethics of retaining knowledge obtained unethically.) Or Shockley, who invented the transistor but advocated eugenics later in life.

    It's not pretty, but you cannot write off the contributions to science of someone -- or some group -- whose actions you might find abhorrent at some level. Wernher von Braun put the U.S. on the moon, like it or not. One act doesn't reduce an entire career to the trash heap.

    1. Re:Maybe this is weird sentiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (err, Shockley -helped- invent the transistor, but hopefully you see my point -- it's awkward to throw away science because you hate the discoverer.)

  14. Let Hans Reiser work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is no reason why a convict should be denied the tools and space to develop software when that software is in everyone's best interest. Even if it was some sort of nonsense app that would provide an income for a convict following release or just keep his skills up to par so that he had hope of earning a living upon release it would be in the public interest.
                    One of the main reasons for another conviction often relates to convicts being kept out of decent jobs when they are put on the streets. If people can not earn a living they don't just dry out like a worm on a sidewalk. A legal living made unavailable will steer them into crime, or cause drunken behaviors that lead to re-arrest.

    1. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He murdered his wife in cold blood and had no qualms about lying his face off to everyone about it. Executing him the same way he did his wife, so that he can't harm another human being again, that would be in the public interest. He doesn't deserve a second chance.

    2. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      This is irrational thinking. Executing him won't bring her back. Locking him up will prevent him from committing further crimes. You're engaging in a version of the sunk cost fallacy.

    3. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by turkeyfeathers · · Score: 2

      But then the entire Slashdot community would have no incentive not to commit heinous crimes. If all that happened when you got caught was 20 years of free meals, free accommodation and a PC to program all day, how does that differ from the average Slashdotter living in his parents' basement? The idea behind prison is to punish people so others will think twice before committing a crime.

    4. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by metamatic · · Score: 2

      There is no reason why a convict should be denied the tools and space to develop software when that software is in everyone's best interest.

      In general, no. However, have you seen his handwritten letters and read the text of his complaints and demands? The guy is seriously delusional and deep in denial. I don't think I'd want to trust my data to code written by a mind that unhinged.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    5. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to good old-fashioned revenge?

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    6. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by Desler · · Score: 1

      Because he's being punished for his heinous act. Boo-fucking-hoo.

    7. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Executing him will prevent him from committing further crimes.

      Locking him up does NOT prevent future crimes.

      Ways he could still commit crime.
      1. He might be released.
      2. Assault other inmates
      3. Assault guards or other staff
      4. Assault a visitor
      5. Damage property.

    8. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      I don't care about giving him a second chance. I want his slave labor more than I want his blood. But I need filesystems more often than I need license plates.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    9. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how does that differ from the average Slashdotter living in his parents' basement?

      Speak for yourself.

    10. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hans Reiser is a dangerous criminal who will never be released from prison. He has a life sentence but the parole board rarely grants parole to murderers. Especially to murderers who do not show a single shred of remorse and who continually blame everyone but themselves. California doesn't let prisoners have laptops, for good reason. Hans has plenty of paper and pencils for him to write software with. He can mail it to someone on the outside with a computer. Note that he spent the last four years sending crazed rants to the Alameda County Civil Court instead of doing anything useful.

    11. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Probably more showers... But they are less fun.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    12. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Executing him will prevent him from committing further crimes.

      Locking him up does NOT prevent future crimes.

      Ways he could still commit crime. 1. He might be released. 2. Assault other inmates 3. Assault guards or other staff 4. Assault a visitor 5. Damage property.

      However, given the nature (murder) and circumstances (murder of his wife after several years of a difficult relationship) of his crime it is very unlikely that he would do a similar thing ever again.

      Using those metrics I have easy access to atm (Germany, 2004-2007), 77% of murder convicts never again come into conflict with the law (which the German Ministry of Justice explicitly attributes to the large number of not per-meditated domestic murders), 6% of murder convicts were later convicted of another violent crime and only 0.3% (2 out of 595 convicts) did commit another murder.

      Locking him up for the rest of his life or killing him is almost certainly a waste of resources if your primary goal is to protect society (as opposed to "justice", "retribution", "vengeance", ...)

    13. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about because he would probably really enjoy himself? Why should he be allowed the same prvileges in prison that he had on the outside? If you could code in prison, lots of geeks will start murdering people just so they can code from free all day long with few distractions, not have to worry about meal times, and there's even people who will offer to help bathe you.

    14. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The public interest is best served through justice and the reduction in the costs of justice.

      Justice is served keeping this man behind bars. The cost of keeping him behind bars is lower than the cost of executing him (go ahead, look it up). Furthermore, the social cost of wrongful execution, which the US has done in the past, is the distrust of the legal system by honest individuals.

    15. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I need filesystems more often than I need license plates.

      Precisely why you shouldn't trust a convict to build them.

    16. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      This is irrational thinking. Executing him won't bring her back. Locking him up will prevent him from committing further crimes. You're engaging in a version of the sunk cost fallacy.

      Not doing executions is irrational thinking. Not doing the execution in public is irrational thinking. Have a day for executions like they used to. Construct the gallows say at the Washington Monument in DC. Hang him,hang him high! The message gets out. Now it's out of the way where nobody but a very select few can see. Repeat with the next cold blooded murderer that we know for sure really is a murderer. It works. Look at Baltimore city (doesn't have Death penalty) and Baltimore country (has DP). It's amazing the difference that political line makes. Less crime and murder in the country. Yet crazy people say it's not a deterrent. Can't explain that line either.

      Arm people too. Issue carry permits. Bring respect back.

    17. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, given the nature (murder) and circumstances (murder of his wife after several years of a difficult relationship) of his crime it is very unlikely that he would do a similar thing ever again.

      Are you fucking kidding me? You clearly have no idea what the circumstances were. The "difficult relationship" was Hans Reiser's own doing. We're talking about a dude who, during divorce court proceedings, seriously tried to claim Nina Reiser wasn't a fit parent because she was against Hans making their very young boys play extremely violent video games. See, Hans had this fucked up pet theory that exposure to violence at an early age is not merely harmless, it's absolutely essential to the proper development of masculinity. In his view, by denying this, Nina Reiser was trying to hurt them. Obviously she deserved to lose custody. And later, to lose her life.

      And no, I'm not being sarcastic with that "deserved to lose her life" comment. Reiser is on the record (post-confession!) claiming Nina literally deserved to die. And that he shouldn't be punished at all for killing her. Elsewhere in the thread, both I and another guy have posted links to Wired stories covering this.

      I should add that despite the mountains of outlandish accusations by Hans, so far as anybody can tell from objective evidence, Nina Reiser's only "crime" against Hans was deciding to stop putting up with his abuse and trying to get full custody of the kids when she filed for divorce.

      You say 77% of German murder convicts never break a law again. This particular guy is a major risk of being in the 23%. He's an abuser who not only shows no sign of remorse for murdering, he's as much as said he'd do it again. His actions and writing make it abundantly clear that he's psychopathic, narcissistic, or both.

    18. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by flyerbri · · Score: 1

      Let's follow your chain of 'rational logic'...

      So you arm people and go to public executions. At a time where America, and the world, are struggling to find an identifying belief system where we can all be in this together. So where does this take us...

      Oh yeah. The Dark Ages through to the Spanish Inquisition. So now you have those who serve a 'governing cause' who are exacting capital punishment as a deterrent for people who murder and commit grievous crime. We are, after all, allowing public dissection of human cadavers... Sooo negative + negative = HMMM..... Your rational brilliance has just sent yourself back to Spain/Rome/Europe circa 1380 /to/ 1480...

      Only this time, you are advocating a 'might makes right' Machiavellian' strategy - but he's not even come around yet (he's 1620's)!

      The things you get to look forward to... The black plague. Columbus sayin 'f this there has to be better' as he sail off into the distance and discovers the new world..Oh yeah, and the founding of the good ole U S of A....

      You, sir, are first in Darwin's Race to Lemming extinction and the endless loop of flawed logic...

      Dear sir. Have you considered reform, psychological application and understanding why these people do what they do.

      Why is it you can justify violence to beget violence? Who is the real terrorist here?

    19. Re:Let Hans Reiser work by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where to even start. Honestly, I have to ask - are you smoking something? How do you get from what I wrote to the dark ages, plague, Columbus, Machiavellian... and even Darwin? Is there some other story or something that I never wrote showing up? You may disagree, however don't do the typical liberal thing of bringing someone elses baggage. Putting words I never said into my mouth. That's not nice and could end up badly for you in certain company.

      Briefly: Read More guns, less crime. You'll understand why we need to arm people. It makes society much safer. Along that logic we need to execute people - publicly. Again, we need to be sure we have the right person. Not an eye witness. I want really good proof or a confession that we're sure wasn't coerced. I'd prefer that we didn't need to do that. However some things like patting a young child on the butt to tell them not to do something is necessary. Some people really do need to see a real execution. If that's not for you, don't come. You see it in the paper, look at something else.

      BTW - Darwin and lemmings, you do know that was a load of crap, right? Lemmings don't run off cliffs.

  15. KillerFS by Ecuador · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you can't change it, embrace it!
    People always say X is the killer FS, no Y is the killer FS. Well, this one really is.

    Dark humor aside, back in 2003-2004 in my university lab we were running a project that required processing of massive amounts of small files. I had trial runs over the linux file systems of the era and Reiser (I guess version 3 back then?) was so much faster in that context that it could actually save significant processing time. So it I always thought it a real shame that the main developer committed murder and development pretty much stopped back then. Yeah, there are now faster and better FSs, but perhaps Reiser would be a great option as well.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:KillerFS by TheLink · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, there are now faster and better FSs, but perhaps Reiser would be a great option as well.

      The problem is vendor lock-in.

      --
    2. Re:KillerFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Reiser's wife is dead. Netcraft confirms it.

    3. Re:KillerFS by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      [slow, appreciative clap]

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    4. Re:KillerFS by tokul · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Reiser would be a great option as well

      YMMV. Moved away from ReiserFS even before murder. Too many random FS corruptions on workstations needed admin intervention to boot.

    5. Re:KillerFS by phorm · · Score: 1

      Back in the day, reiser was faster. Unfortunately it also had some really nasty issues with nested filesystems and btree corruption (I believe in cases where you had a loopback/VM filesystem using reiserfs on a disk also using reiserfs).

      That was one issue among various, so speed wasn't a problem so much as integrity. Reiser's case may have spawned dark jokes about it killing your files, but when the FS ran into issues, it usually did just that.

    6. Re:KillerFS by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Regardless of what you think of Hans, technically the Reiserfs filesystem has potential and could use some more active developers to tune for modern use-cases. I used to use Reiserfs exclusively for my root filesystems (lots of small files, which benefit from the tail-packing feature in Reiserfs) and Squid filesystems.

      --Once things started going south and distros deprecated support for it in the install ISO's, I switched to JFS for everything except root (which is now ext4) and haven't looked back. But I still think the filesystem itself has technical merit, and would benefit from further development and mainline inclusion.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  16. Re:Bug fixes? by armanox · · Score: 0

    Well, it is a killer file system....

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  17. Lack of knowledge by leandrod · · Score: 1

    Lack of knowledge is so sad. One has only to have a passing understanding of data models to read Reiser’s paper and realise he
    does not understand the fundamental concepts of the field. Such a waste of time, money and talents.

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    1. Re:Lack of knowledge by Bronster · · Score: 0

      Sorry - which filesystem did you author which is significantly faster and more reliable than reiserfs thanks to your superior knowledge of the field?

    2. Re:Lack of knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christoph Hellwig, is that you?!

      http://geekz.co.uk/lovesraymond/archive/so-i-married-a-kernel-programmer

    3. Re:Lack of knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until today, heck, until this very minute, I had never noticed Andre Hedrick on Linus' shirt.

      RIP Hedrick.

  18. Data loss was the real...ahem...killer by drig · · Score: 2

    I stopped using ReiserFS long before it's namesake was arrested. It used to lose data. That's pretty much a showstopper for a filesystem who's claim to fame was reliability.

    --
    Citizens Against Plate Tectonics
    1. Re:Data loss was the real...ahem...killer by Bronster · · Score: 1

      I never saw that running on decent hardware with battery backed RAID units. I saw significant dataloss the one time I tried XFS (all of - ooh, a month ago) and had to nuke the entire server and start over.

      We run ext4 rather than reiserfs mostly now, but it served us well for very many years.

      Mind you - I did try reiser4 on my laptop for a bit back in 2004, and I had dataloss there. Never had dataloss with reiser3 though, except the really early versions. Even then it was a lot better than ext2, which was the alternative at the time.

    2. Re:Data loss was the real...ahem...killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, anyone critical of ReiserFS really needs to remember ext2fs.

    3. Re:Data loss was the real...ahem...killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last time I tried reiser4 must have been a year ago. Problem were too long filepaths when compiling a kernel... this is pretty much the same problem NTFS still has especially in combination with MS Office and their CHAR length filenames.

    4. Re:Data loss was the real...ahem...killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the general view was "really fast if you have a huge amount of small files (but it might eat your lunch)" ?

    5. Re:Data loss was the real...ahem...killer by corychristison · · Score: 1

      My preferred setup for a while now (~8 years) has been JFS for /, XFS for /Media (where I store 1.2TB of Photos, Music, Movies and TV episodes. Not to be confused with /media).

      When I first chose this setup, JFS was still considered the new kid on the block, and its reliability had yet to be proven.

      I took a risk but it seems to have worked out for me.

      Everyone seems to forget about JFS for some reason. Is there something I am missing?

    6. Re:Data loss was the real...ahem...killer by Bronster · · Score: 1

      Shit-slow unlink speed I think. My use-case is massive mail-server filesystems where there are millions of small files. The performance limiting factor is almost always unlinks with any filesystem.

    7. Re:Data loss was the real...ahem...killer by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --I really like JFS. I use it for everything except root (ext4) because it's good for running VMs off of - it doesn't use a lot of CPU. (Which I found out via a Slashdot benchmark-comparison article, a number of years ago.) And it runs well on USB/Firewire external drives.

      --However, the JFS codebase hasn't had really any updates outside of maintenance and compatibility for quite a while now, and my limited experiments revealed that ext4 was passing it for speed. So some of my USB external drives are on ext4 now.

      --I really wish something like Google Summer of Code would revisit JFS and upgrade its features/throughput for more modern hardware; but it's solid enough that I still use it for the majority of my stuff. (And FSCK on JFS doesn't take long at all.)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    8. Re:Data loss was the real...ahem...killer by corychristison · · Score: 1

      Absolutely understandable, especially in that situation.

      I built my current workstation ~5 years ago, and haven't really paid much attention to the newer filesystems. At the time JFS seemed like the best option for my use (basic workstation, some programming/compiling but nothing crazy) and because it is what I used on my previous workstation.

      Did some looking around, and EXT4 looks really nice in the benchmarks I've come across. Going to have to try it out.

  19. Release Date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be out in about 15 years - earlier with good behavior.

  20. Benchmarked on SSD? by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 4, Informative

    The bottom of the first page in Phoronix's benchmarks says "The disk drive being used for all testing was a high-end 160GB Intel SSD." Since different filesystems are optimized for different things, it seems such benchmarks could be completely irrelevant for anyone using hard drives (where seek times are very significant compared to SSD).

    1. Re:Benchmarked on SSD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phoronix is great, but they rarely have ideal testing setups...Here are the numbers* (*oops, we left the debug options on and the test system only has ATA-66)

    2. Re:Benchmarked on SSD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse than that, filing systems designed for platters can potentially cause much heavier wear on SSDs than filing systems specifically designed for flash memory.

  21. Aliens by cje · · Score: 2

    The murder of his wife was the straw that broke the camel's back, but for me, I started turning away from Reiser based on the sliminess of the Burke character he played in "Aliens". Of course, that "Mad About You" shit didn't help much, either.

    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
  22. Some action should be taken to fix this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For example developers should be jailed for being late in delivering code.

  23. Al Bundy by tepples · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will more people think of Ted Bundy, a serial killer, or Al Bundy, a character played by Ed O'Neill on the sitcom Married with Children?

    1. Re:Al Bundy by PerfectionLost · · Score: 1

      Thought of Al here. Either scenario is funny--though ones a comedy and the others a tragedy.

    2. Re:Al Bundy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't think it's appropriate to refer to serial killings as a comedy.

    3. Re:Al Bundy by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's appropriate to refer to serial killings as a comedy.

      Unless you're writing a novel in the first-person taking place in Miami. But other than that, one shouldn't make fun of someone's personal comedy...I mean, tragedy...I mean, you know what I mean, I'm not mean.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Al Bundy by sentientbeing · · Score: 1

      Unless you're a serial killer targeting the clown community.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    5. Re:Al Bundy by countach · · Score: 1

      One is a comedy from tragedy.

    6. Re:Al Bundy by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Dexter Bundy Morgan?

          Nah, that doesn't have a good ring to it. Lucky he doesn't have a middle name in the books nor on the show.

          At least Dexter knows how to get rid of a body. Putting the bloody remains of your freshly deadified wife in the front seat of your car, and having to pull the seat and carpet to get rid of the blood, really isn't good planning.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  24. Hey Beavis.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He said his package.use is long.

  25. Inventor of the atomic bomb by sourcerror · · Score: 1

    Einstein didn't even get security clearance to work on the Manhattan project because he was a pacifist.
    There were about 10 000 scientists working on the Manhattan project, but if I had to name the inventor of the atomic bomb, I would say it was Leo Szilard.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93Szil%C3%A1rd_letter

    1. Re:Inventor of the atomic bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or even Oppenheimer

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Robert_Oppenheimer

      But not Einstein

    2. Re:Inventor of the atomic bomb by Teancum · · Score: 1

      I would argue that the real 'inventor" of the atomic bomb, at least so far as to produce the scientific theory (nuclear fission) that firmly established how it could be built, was discovered by Lise Meitner. It was even more sobering that she was a prominent scientist in a university of Nazi Germany, but was kept from actually doing much with her theories because she was both a woman and a Jew. As a result, she had to flee to Sweden in what is a most amazing story worthy of an Indiana Jones movie.

      She should have received a Nobel Prize for her work, but the International Atomic Union gave her an honor worthy of her accomplishments: naming an element after her. She certainly ranks right with Marie Curie in terms of accomplishments.

      Interestingly, she was offered a job at Los Alamos and flat out refused to be involved because she completely understood what the implications of building such a weapons meant and what was required to get it built.

  26. I don't know about jokes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but I tried ReiserFS once and most of my files disappeared. I wish he was available to lead me out to where he hid them.

  27. Can't trust it to honor permissions by ezakimak · · Score: 1

    We know from experience that hidden files won't stay hidden for long. A little coersion and it confesses everything--all in hopes that it won't get reformatted.

  28. so a new version by nimbius · · Score: 1

    of an acclaimed FS is on the horizon and we laugh at its creator who murdered his wife. Im not sure how it works in other countries, but in America the prison system is just another device for enacting biblical retribution. Hans isnt seeing any treatment for his actions, rather hes spending 15 years to life in prison.

    Depending on your personal conviction to things like the death penalty and crime in general, you could consider the man who brought you a glorious experiment, ReiserFS, is a sick man. He's been taken to the cleaners for 60 million in a wrongful death suit, which is said to go to "the kids" but seriously sounds like it was orchestrated by their grandmother. After the trial he insisted the attorney forced him to take the stand, and afterwards served as his own attorney. Hes repeating the same delusional actions of self representation he did during the original trial, and no one considers this a manifestation of an illness.

    if none of this makes any sense and you're still subscribed to the idea that prison was the best solution for this man, then you can revel in the computer chair justice of knowing he was brutally assaulted by several prisoners in 2009. The DOJ's solution, not to rehabilitate or anything, was simply to shuffle what amounts to another cash cow to another farm. he is currently in Pleasant Valley state prison.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  29. Al Bundy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The man who only wanted to murder his wife.

  30. Trip down memory lane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have fond memories of how half of Slashdot was convinced Reiser was innocent and being prosecuted by agents of Microsoft, as a message to Linux developers. His conviction just fueled the speculations. It wasn't until he led authorities to the body that Slashdot gave up on the idea.

    1. Re:Trip down memory lane by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Until that point the evidence that had been reported to the public was very slim, and there had a lot of very strange and confusing reports due to some of the suspicious people he associated with that ultimately turned out to be irrelevant noise.

  31. Romantic by Candyban · · Score: 1

    Nothing quite as romantic ...

    Always remember: The shortest way to a woman's heart is through her ribcage

  32. Revenge is not our job by tepples · · Score: 1

    According to Paul of Tarsus, revenge is someone else's job, not ours (Romans 12:19).

    1. Re:Revenge is not our job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About six verses later he says that it's the rulers' and authorities' job. Nothing wrong with asking our rulers and authorities to do their job, is there?

  33. Kernel Merge Expected by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

    in 20 years to life.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  34. I tried ReiserFS once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it just uninstalled my car's passenger seat. Has anyone else seen this?

  35. Re:Piss off. Seriously. by hazah · · Score: 1

    You may want to tone down your sensitivity for this one, it was not serious.

  36. What sealed it by phorm · · Score: 1

    I believe what sealed it in the end was that he eventually led them to the body in return for more lenient sentence. Pretty hard to argue his innocence after that.

  37. The next big thing is... ZFS by ansible · · Score: 1

    I believe the next big thing is ZFS. My paranoid side reads these articles about how disk error rates are staying about the same, but disk capacities are going up and up. I'm thinking that ZFS and anything else that can verify the reads / writes sucess is a very good thing moving forward.

    1. Re:The next big thing is... ZFS by countach · · Score: 1

      But... they open sourced it, and nobody seems to care. I have no idea why. Even Apple, who seemed to be moving into it, now looks like they've backed away from it. There must be something wrong with it?

  38. bad FS, BAD by Eddy_D · · Score: 1

    No! don't re-integrate it, it's cursed!

    --
    - I stole your sig.
  39. Yes, Hans Reiser was convicted by KZigurs · · Score: 0

    As far as anybody should care this does not matter much - it says fairly little with regards to whether he actually did or did not kill his wife and unless there's a body and physical evidence (and as far as I know there is only circumstantial - his wife has been in his car, yeah, surprise), this will remain a not quite shut and sealed matter.

    If the filesystem is any good the issue above is moot regardless. Just stop with the cheap puns. Guilty or not, being convicted is a very shady metric to determine it reliably.

    1. Re:Yes, Hans Reiser was convicted by Alphadecay27 · · Score: 2

      I think the fact that he confessed to killing her and then proceeded to lead police to her body is a pretty good indication of his guilt: http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Reiser-confesses-to-strangling-estranged-wife-3197731.php

  40. Punishment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not about punishment; maybe to you and most American twisted fucks. Prison is to keep antisocial people away from the society they are unable to live in. If they can be productive or beneficial to society by other means then they should be. The birdman of Alcatraz helped society more than most people and he was reformed but that is another issue. If you kill people then you can't be trusted; however, if one is "fixed" then maybe they can be let out; if you can't be sure they are "fixed" then you do not take the risk and keep thin removed from society. Punishment has limited benefits and going to extremes like the USA harms society; and I suppose they deserve what they inflict upon themselves... fools eventually hurt themselves.

    For a Christian nation the USA is extremely unchristian. Vengeance is for god and blasphemers.

  41. Possibly decent but a long long way to go by dbIII · · Score: 1

    File system corruption on that system means wiping and staring again - there's no fsck to fix minor errors. The reason given for this lack was that it was a perfect system, which is no help at all if it's not running on perfect hardware.
    It's a proof of concept system that is not yet designed for use in any situation where the contents of the data stored on the file system actually matter.

    1. Re:Possibly decent but a long long way to go by tibit · · Score: 1

      I agree but the quality of the code wasn't my point. I argued that no matter what the quality of the code was, the personal troubles of the chief architect don't figure in the equation if one is to stay rational. According to you the code is essentially shit, and I'd agree there, but, again, that's beside the point entirely. The idea that filesystem data stays uncorrupted is a pipe dream of course unless you get an error correcting block driver layer. It's silly to assume such when, demonstrably, no such layer was in common use on Linux when reiser4 was being developed. Heck, no such layer is in common use on Linux even now -- lvm doesn't have such a plugin, right?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    2. Re:Possibly decent but a long long way to go by dbIII · · Score: 1

      According to you the code is essentially shit

      I never said that.
      It could be perfect for what is there but it's missing some features I consider important. The designer didn't consider it important (said it was unnecessary because file corruption would never happen using his software, and ignored that hardware isn't perfect), which was a bit much to take since even with something as paranoid as ZFS the designers do not dismiss fsck out of hand.

    3. Re:Possibly decent but a long long way to go by Wolfrider · · Score: 2

      --I call BS on this - I used Reiserfs in "production" on my systems for years. Yes, there were some problems with loopback/VM filesystems, but they fixed that bug a long time ago. There *is* a reiserfsck utility. Yes, it could use some improvements and a bit more paranoia for fixups in real-world cases, but it's not like it doesn't exist at all.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  42. Worse than that by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It doesn't even have fsck and that delay was from replaying a portion of the journal. There's nothing wrong with that, ext* does that too, but it did seem to be almost as slow doing it as ext* takes with a full fsck a couple of times a year.

    1. Re:Worse than that by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Again, I'm going to call BS on you because you obviously haven't done your research - this is from Linux Mint 11:

      $ dpkg -L reiserfsprogs /. /sbin /sbin/mkreiserfs /sbin/reiserfsck =-- Note /sbin/resize_reiserfs /sbin/debugreiserfs /sbin/reiserfstune /sbin/mkfs.reiserfs /sbin/fsck.reiserfs =-- Note

      --Please stop posting FUD and things that are obviously and verifiably untrue.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    2. Re:Worse than that by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      ...and for completeness:

      http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/reiser4progs

        The following utilities to manage Reiser4 filesystems are provided:

          - debugfs.reiser4
        *** - fsck.reiser4
          - measurefs.reiser4
          - mkfs.reiser4

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  43. Think Different! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let's name btrfs as reiser5!

  44. Re:Piss off. Seriously. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may want to tone down your sensitivity for this one, it was not serious.

    Different AC here telling you to fuck off too. Making jokes about murderous thoughts towards spouses in the context of Hans Reiser, who actually murdered his wife and was more or less proud of it (because in his mind the bitch was asking for it by defying him)? Not actually funny. "I WAS JOKING" is not a get-out-of-jail-free card. It is in fact possible to cross the line over into not-funny and just plain offensive territory, and you're totally out of line for whining about people being too "sensitive".

  45. Proof That Using Open Source Software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Encourages homicide.

    Microsoft, take note.

  46. Obvious? Not really by dbIII · · Score: 1

    OK then - instead of calling people names (ie. spreader of fear, uncertainty and doubt - think you need a different insult for the merely ignorant) for not keeping in touch with changes to what we all assumed was a dead project for the past few years how about letting us know how long ago it came in? I can't tell from that link on your other post and had incorrectly assumed that the messy dd method was still the only hope. If I mucked about with that stupid waste of time for no reason a few years back I'm going to feel very silly.

  47. Re:Obvious? Not really by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

    --Sorry bout that; it's just the way you came across. Personally, I had only a vague idea that Reiser4 was still in semi-active development until I saw this Slashdot headline.

    --I did come up with a few links, but as for when $bug was fixed in Reiserfs, you would prolly have to search the kernel mailing lists or the project's home page.

    https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Reiser4

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reiser4#History_of_Reiser4

    https://reiser4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  48. Re:Obvious? Not really by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Thanks for that. I only ever saw Reiserfs when it failed so I'd say I have a skewed impression on it. One of the more trendy than stable linux distros had Reiserfs as it's default some years ago when it was still in a state of rapid change, and a few people at my workplace put it on laptops. Combine beta software with less than perfect drives and frequent power loss (laptops running out of charge) and it's a pretty tough situation for a filesystem. The nail in the coffin was a lot of files of a size the file system couldn't handle very well at that point (I can't remember if they were multi-GB sizes files or thousands of 1k ones - R&D had situations with both), especially if the user let the thing lose power and it had to slowly replay it's journal on startup with that file size the filesystem wasn't designed to handle well at that point. We never actually lost anything worth recovering, but it was a pain at times.
    Maybe I should give it another look, but I'm one of those types that's not even going to use btrfs or a linux zfs system yet on anything where I can't tolerate losing a days worth of new files.