No, they were annoyed by the countless disputes they had to remedy. Those things cost their support people time and money that could be bett spent elsewhere.
Except that wasn't the problem. eBay didn't want the headache of sorting out disputes for this category of items that they apparently don't have for mainstream religious items. If the selling of holy water caused numerous disputes and caused them a lot of support time they'd ban those sales, too.
And in case you don't believe me read here. You only assume debt as a buyer if you agree to do so, it's a de facto merger, if the seller company is really just a continuation of the original company in that most of the people running it are the same or if you don't notify the sellers creditors in a reasonable time period before acquiring the assets.
and I assume that the Slashdot editors have a pretty good sense of what will be useful/interesting to their readership overall
You're joking, right? These are the same idiots who came up with turds such as Idle, Slash BI and Slashdot TV that have been almost universally hated. They haven't had a good idea in ages. Let alone the fact that they are too stupid to even properly spell check and fact check the submissions. You give them far too much credit.
The iPhone has nothing going for it anymore except that it's made by Apple and costs nearly twice as much as similar smart phones.
No, it doesn't. New iPhone models have $199 subsidized prices which is exactly the same cost as a new Galaxy S model or any comparable high-end Android phone. Even going by unsubsidized price the difference between the Galaxy S 3 and the 4S is actually $50 dollars in the 4S's favor (16 GB 4S is $649 vs Galaxy S 3 16GB at $699). Comparing against the Galaxy S 2 the price difference is $649 to $549. Last time I checked that's not twice as much but is less than 20% difference. What 'similar smart phone' are you talking about that costs half as much as the iPhone?
With MPEG4 compression that could be upped to HD quality, but you would still lose a lot of high frequency movie content (1080i =/= 2000p of today's movies).
Then encode it to a higher resolution than 1080p. Wow, that was a hard solution...
Slashdot Mirror
No, they were annoyed by the countless disputes they had to remedy. Those things cost their support people time and money that could be bett spent elsewhere.
Except that wasn't the problem. eBay didn't want the headache of sorting out disputes for this category of items that they apparently don't have for mainstream religious items. If the selling of holy water caused numerous disputes and caused them a lot of support time they'd ban those sales, too.
To clarify that is for both the debts and liabilities.
And in case you don't believe me read here. You only assume debt as a buyer if you agree to do so, it's a de facto merger, if the seller company is really just a continuation of the original company in that most of the people running it are the same or if you don't notify the sellers creditors in a reasonable time period before acquiring the assets.
Wrong. People buy just the assets of companies and leave behind the debt and liabilities all the time to the original owners.
This just in: businesses have control of what actions they will allow others to do on their property.
When it comes to hiring practices, yes. There is nothing illegal about eBay limiting what things it wants people selling on its property.
It's not just analogue audio it also carries analogue video.
Patenting of genes in the EU is already allowed.
Because someone anti-patent would be "impartial"?
With these patents, does that mean that they own certain types of cancer?
No.
Don't be so sure.
and I assume that the Slashdot editors have a pretty good sense of what will be useful/interesting to their readership overall
You're joking, right? These are the same idiots who came up with turds such as Idle, Slash BI and Slashdot TV that have been almost universally hated. They haven't had a good idea in ages. Let alone the fact that they are too stupid to even properly spell check and fact check the submissions. You give them far too much credit.
And before you try to claim the Galaxy Nexus. It cost $699 unsubsidized when it was released originally.
The iPhone has nothing going for it anymore except that it's made by Apple and costs nearly twice as much as similar smart phones.
No, it doesn't. New iPhone models have $199 subsidized prices which is exactly the same cost as a new Galaxy S model or any comparable high-end Android phone. Even going by unsubsidized price the difference between the Galaxy S 3 and the 4S is actually $50 dollars in the 4S's favor (16 GB 4S is $649 vs Galaxy S 3 16GB at $699). Comparing against the Galaxy S 2 the price difference is $649 to $549. Last time I checked that's not twice as much but is less than 20% difference. What 'similar smart phone' are you talking about that costs half as much as the iPhone?
Yes exactly as I said 3 posts above.
USB scan carry analogue signals such as the dock connector can?
It's a standard pushed by the EU not a law. Also, Apple sells a mini-USB adapter to comply with the standard.
No, it doesn't. That is a bendable cable.
Because anyone can start a company and declare themselves the CEO.
Apple was part of the group.
No they won't. They provide an adapter which complies with the rules.
Since his game looks like a generic fantasy game I doubt anyone will care about it regardless.
I really doubt anyone will care about his crappy looking game even without a Carrington event.
With MPEG4 compression that could be upped to HD quality, but you would still lose a lot of high frequency movie content (1080i =/= 2000p of today's movies).
Then encode it to a higher resolution than 1080p. Wow, that was a hard solution...