And yet when an attacker can recover their plaintext password is doesn't really matter how "secure" the password was. I could have the strongest, most random password possible but if an attacker can steal it from you in plaintext, so what?
And strong passwords are meaningless if the company is storing them in a really stupid way such that they can be recovered in plain text by an attacker. At that point, adobe123 is no less secure than a 64-character randomly-generated password.
How cute. Except that that credit agency will simply be ignored by the corporations who are colluding with the corrupt agency. And there will be nothing you can do to stop that. What you claim seems to come from someone completely ignorant to the history of corporations.
Slashdot Mirror
And yet when an attacker can recover their plaintext password is doesn't really matter how "secure" the password was. I could have the strongest, most random password possible but if an attacker can steal it from you in plaintext, so what?
And strong passwords are meaningless if the company is storing them in a really stupid way such that they can be recovered in plain text by an attacker. At that point, adobe123 is no less secure than a 64-character randomly-generated password.
No, it will "polymorphically" add Slashvertisements to the pages you get served.
How cute. Except that that credit agency will simply be ignored by the corporations who are colluding with the corrupt agency. And there will be nothing you can do to stop that. What you claim seems to come from someone completely ignorant to the history of corporations.
In a true free market people will choose not to do business with a company that engages in fraudulent behavior, of course.
And do what? Move to the other corporations who are colluding with the first one? Oh what grand choices!
Through what? Wishful thinking? Certainly not based on the hundreds of years of history of corporate behavior.
But knowing that would require actually having read all of what Adam Smith wrote not just the parts one likes.
Then they'll send you to a collections agent and have that appear on your credit report.
What about them? This is like asking why story about a baseball game didn't talk about the Pro Bowl.
They wrote a check to Dice?
Yeah, he rails against Internet anonymity and uses a pseudonym to post. He should make his post under his real name otherwise he's being a hypocrite.
Neo Nazis are in bread now? White, wheat or whole-wheat white?
That one was actually added by samzenpus himself.
Downloading the ads defeats the major reasons of using an adblocker which is to reduce data use and to prevent malware ads being downloaded.
Bush let them run wild, too, no matter that Obama didn't make anything better.
Why would it drive tuition down? Do you live in a fantasy world?
No how would it?
They were open with the Tor devs. Even said so explicitly in the article.
And yet Qt has language wrappers for 16 different languages. Doesn't seem to be all that hard.
A billion people not in your parents' basement?
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=138972987203440&w=2
Meaning the project won't be able to cover 20 thousand dollars in electrical expenses before being able to use money for other things.
His post is even dumber in light of there only being C++98 and C++11. No one is obligated to use C++11 either.
So doing something in Javascript is a front page story? Is the language that crappy that being able to do mundane things with it is now news?
And of course I'm referring to k6mfw. His post was just white-washed nostalgia ignoring the dozens of Constitutional abuses one could lay out.
Where did he point out "others it wasn't yet"? Direct quote, please, because what I read had no such statement or implication.