You do realize such lawsuits will only happen if the government lets it, right? You haven't missed the last 30 years of case law regarding this, have you?
If you get paid hourly then perhaps. If it is irrefutable that its your fault/bug then you should feel obligated to fix for no extra charge/hours to them. If there is any doubt on the source of the bug (multiple developers) then you should be paid to fix it.
With very few exceptions, having your employees work for no pay is illegal in the US. And, no, fixing a bug that you created is not one of those exceptions.
Where is the service using his name? It doesn't appear on their main page or any page I've looked at on their site. The article mentions his name, but so what? You don't need permission to mention a name in an article.
Saying his name in a story is not copyright infringement. Nor is this scam service using his likeness or claiming he is a user. One can hope your simply trollbaiting and not a moron.
Nope they haven't even amassed 4 bitcoins in donation.
Tip4Commit supported 337 GitHub projects, for which 9,076 tips have been earned (a tip is earned when a pull request for a commit on a supported project is accepted), totaling about 3.34 (worth about $2,650 at today's Bitcoin exchange rate of $793.20).
This is just an advertisement for some no-name trying to ride Linus' coattails for publicity.
Not collecting sends a message to anyone who is considering to tip you that you're not interested.
And if they really aren't interested, so what? Why should anyone be obligated to care about this stupid startup? If they can't get people interested then the whole thing should simply be allowed to fail.
Last 4 are not a secret. Best buy and lots of box retailers now actually ask you for it when you check out. You have to broadcast it in the air in front of everyone in line.
Because your unable to just hand them the card to read?
What they are closing off has nothing to do with the ability of OEMs and others to make custom home screens and launchers nor are they going to block that.
Slashdot Mirror
but that doesn't excuse the /. editors for not engaging their brains.
Wouldn't they need to meet the prerequisite of having a functioning one, first?
That's funny.
First link searching "Sybase ASE Manual" on Bing: http://manuals.sybase.com/onli...
Searching for "IBM DB/2 LUW manual" yielded:
https://www-304.ibm.com/suppor...
https://www-304.ibm.com/suppor...
http://www.ibm.com/support/doc...
As the first three results.
Unless you're using a different Bing it seems what you claim is mostly bull.
You do realize such lawsuits will only happen if the government lets it, right? You haven't missed the last 30 years of case law regarding this, have you?
Care to explain the Alien and Sedition acts passed in 1798, then?
Microsoft doesn't own Nokia's handset business yet. So, no, it's not their phone.
Exactly. It was only one patient and they died.
If you get paid hourly then perhaps. If it is irrefutable that its your fault/bug then you should feel obligated to fix for no extra charge/hours to them. If there is any doubt on the source of the bug (multiple developers) then you should be paid to fix it.
With very few exceptions, having your employees work for no pay is illegal in the US. And, no, fixing a bug that you created is not one of those exceptions.
Read the terms of the sale. It is quite explicit that you only licensed it.
It refutes your point that "the EULA is shown *before* (emphasis mine) the purchase" as it changes afterwards...
In what way exactly? Steam always shows you the new EULA to accept if it's been modified.
Hey, Panasonic, what would you say about the /. Beta? Hmm??
"It looks like shit".
There is a duplicate post filter. It's just extremely easy to bypass.
Sure, freetards believe that, but their opinions hardly matter.
They're telling people "Would you like to give Linus some money? We'll do it in your behalf (while taking a % of it for ourselves)".
No they aren't. Their website says no such thing.
Where is the service using his name? It doesn't appear on their main page or any page I've looked at on their site. The article mentions his name, but so what? You don't need permission to mention a name in an article.
How would it be in conflict, exactly?
Saying his name in a story is not copyright infringement. Nor is this scam service using his likeness or claiming he is a user. One can hope your simply trollbaiting and not a moron.
Ignoring it is not the same as being able to block it, though.
Or an even simpler explanation: this is a no-name startup that next to no one has ever heard of or cares about.
Nope they haven't even amassed 4 bitcoins in donation.
Tip4Commit supported 337 GitHub projects, for which 9,076 tips have been earned (a tip is earned when a pull request for a commit on a supported project is accepted), totaling about 3.34 (worth about $2,650 at today's Bitcoin exchange rate of $793.20).
This is just an advertisement for some no-name trying to ride Linus' coattails for publicity.
Not collecting sends a message to anyone who is considering to tip you that you're not interested.
And if they really aren't interested, so what? Why should anyone be obligated to care about this stupid startup? If they can't get people interested then the whole thing should simply be allowed to fail.
Then maybe the US Government shouldn't have been doing things that would piss the world off if found out?
Last 4 are not a secret. Best buy and lots of box retailers now actually ask you for it when you check out. You have to broadcast it in the air in front of everyone in line.
Because your unable to just hand them the card to read?
For nothing? So they make no revenue from the apps they sell or the ads?
What they are closing off has nothing to do with the ability of OEMs and others to make custom home screens and launchers nor are they going to block that.
Sure that would likely thwart it. The point is that it's currently crappily implemented.